I love my 50mm for concert photography. It gets right up in the performers face; however I’m purchasing the 35mm next to be able to capture more of the performer and to be more versatile with my street photography.
I’d also suggest taking a look at the sigma 16mm for concert photography. You could get in the face of a singer and possible get the band in too for a unique look! Thanks for checking the video out Brittany!
Thank you for actually showing examples of what the pictures look like vs talk for an hour and never actually show side by side comparisons. This video is exactly what I was looking for.
Almost two years later and this info is still very useful! For engagement reference, I basically just came to this video to see the visual comparison of the photos. It's great that you did an indoor/close up shot and an outdoor/portrait shot. I'm looking at these for food photography and videography.
My 50mm came with a hood, which is about twice as deep as the screw on one you had. I’m sure I read somewhere years ago that often hood shapes/sizes are specific to the lens due the way light might be reflected, so the other style may not work on the 50mm.
@@FAHAMNI Go ahead get the Sony 1.8 if u you want to! It's great. I still use it A LOT. Or if you have a bigger budget I'd look at Sigmas 58mm 1.4 contemporary. It's quite heavy and huge tho.
@@SideshowBob44 the point is that the hood protects the lens from scratches when not using the hood for sun etc. What evidence suggests it’s pointless?
Top 5 must have apsc Sony lens (starter) Sony 50MM f/1.8 oss Sony 35MM f/1.8 oss Sony 10-18MM f4 oss Sony 55-210MM f4.5 oss Sony g 90 2.8MM f2.8 oss These 5 lens will hold down any apsc user at any focal length until they are ready for gm lens. Tamron 17-70MM f2.8 vc us the must have upgrade to the kit lens for any apsc user as well. Awesome video
Comparing apples and oranges. The lenses belong to two different categories. The 50 is a tele photo lens so the right thing to do would to compare it to other tele photo lenses. While you could use the 35 as your sole lens, that is not possible with the 50. It has nothing to do with being a beginner or not. First one needs a wide angle lens. The classic accompanying lens to a moderate wide is a moderate tele, in full format 35mm and a 85mm. For some people perhaps 28 / 50 (full format) is better. It’s a matter of taste.
But if I'm right (correct me if I'm wrong) that 50mm lens on crop sensor camera (a6000) is like 75mm on full frame? So you need around 32mm on crop if you want same results as 50mm on full?
My only question is if the photos at same settings are the samw bright or if 35mm is brighter. (Both at F1.8) I am just watching the video so I dom't know yet if it gets covered.
I hope you can help me out with this question. I’m just getting into photography and I’m debating whether to buy the Sony A6000, Nikon d5600 or the Canon T7. What do you recommend for a beginner? I want to use it for TH-cam videos and taking pictures of my daughters dance recitals. Please help, thank you.
I don’t like DSLR’s at this point anymore, so I’d recommend the Sony a6000. But for TH-cam it has quirks. No microphone input, and it overheats when doing more than 20 min of video. The a6000 is the only mirrorless you mention, and mirrorless are smaller, lighter, and have electronic viewfinders. An electronic viewfinder is where you look I. The viewfinder and it’s just like a screen, much like a phone, and you can change settings and see. The changes. On a DSLR you cannot see changes or even how a photo looks until you take it and then review it on the back screen. DSLR’s May have better battery life than the a6000, and a swivel screen, but they’re slower in shooting speed, heavier, and being phased out. Doesn’t mean a DSLR isn’t the camera for you. I work with canon t7’s at my job and they work fine, they do take good images, but I myself prefer a smaller, lighter, and better featured camera in the a6000. I film all my TH-cam videos with the a6000 but I use an external mic, and I stop recording at 15ish minutes and restart because I know the camera overheats around 20 min. Hopefully some of this helps!
I think it all comes down to the types of photographs you like taking. I think that for portraits the 50 mm is a really good lens. You get great shots without having to either crop them afterwards or being so close that your sitter may feel uncomfortable. For general photography, I think the 35 mm is probably better; I don’t own and probably won’t buy it as I have the 50 mm and the 30 mm f3.5 macro.
Really late here. But I just got the camera with both lenses used on eBay. Absolute beginner and very excited. Great video. Helped me to figure out what they can do. Thanks a lot.
I have both and like both - just use them in different circumstances. I wish Sony would release a comparably priced, sized and quality APS-C 23mm f1.8 with OSS to complement these 2 lenses.
@@IRFAN-po5sz they are both good. Which is better for you depends on which camera you have and what conditions you shoot in. The 50mm has stabilization (OSS) so it's good if your camera does not have in body stabilization and you shoot hand held. If you use a tripod, shoot in dark conditions, have IBIS in your camera or really want shallow depth of field then the 56mm Sigma would be better for you.
@@gabithemagyar Thanks for your comprehensive answer. Actually i have Sony A6400 and i never use tripod. So Sony 50mm oss will better for as you said. One thing i observed that many A6400 owners getting Sigma 56mm instead of 50mm they claim that higher shutter speed is alternative of IBIS . Is it true ?Why everybody (a6400) owner praising Sigma even without tripod usage. ?
The 35 is good enough for me for street photography. I tried the 50, it was too cramped and difficult to compose a photo. But really depends on what genre you're doing.
Late to the party but here goes. I have a sony a6300 with 85mm 1.8 fe and sigma 30mm 1.4 (love them both). I am considering replacing them with sony 18-105 f4 and 50mm 1.8 (for a more versatile and oss combo). Will I miss my primes? Hard decision :) What do you think?
Primes do offer typically a better sharpness at their fixed focal length, compared to a zoom, but zooms offer a wide array of possibilities. It really depends on your style. I will say I love the Sony 50mm f1.8.
Hi nice video! Do you also use clear image zoom? I have a new a6400 and 35 1.8 and I was thinking about either buying the 50 1.8 or just use the clear image zoom with the 35... Do you think is there a loss in the final quality? I shoot mainly videos. Thanks!
There isn’t much loss in good light. However the 50 is a fantastic lens and really sharp. For video I would try clear image zoom first, and if it doesn’t meet your standards look into the 50mm.
Both of these lenses one year later are about $100 more in price, than your state in your video. I am new to photography and am not familiar with how the "market" works, so to speak. Is it normal for lenses to go up in price in such an extreme amount?
Fluctuations of $50 is pretty normal for a lens. If it’s on Amazon prices can vary from week to week to month to month. Like right now the Canon M50 is $150 off it’s normal price on Amazon. I always suggest checking the used section on amazon - the link below the item details! When researching you’ll kind of gauge the full price and then keep an eye on it from there. I use the honey add on for certain stuff I don’t wanna miss out on.
Missed your videos! I have the 50mm and absolutely love it but I do wish it wasn’t so zoomed in at times. Definitely want to get the 35mm next! Thanks for comparing the two!! Very informative!
Not to contradict anything Kyle said, but check out the Sigma 30mm. If you look at comparison stuff on youtube most everyone I have found likes the Sigma better. Just letting you know so you can compare yourself.
Interesting. Not sure. I think it fluctuates for that lens honestly. I typically see it at $300 or sometimes lower somehow. It’s an awesome lens though.
I love my Sigma 30mm 1.4 it's a little bit wider than the 35mm which really helps for general purpose or indoor shots, it's cheaper faster and sharper than the 35..
I am looking for a good lens to take pictures of my dog. A friend of mine has an 85mm for her full frame camera and makes the most beautiful pictures. So I guess the 50mm is great?
Sounds like you might prefer the 35mm focal length. It is more convenient for a lot of things - especially indoors (the 50mm is often too close). Have you tried the 28mm f/2 or the 30mm signma against the 35mm? Or tried using the 35mm using the in-camera zoom mode to give you a similar view as the 50mm?
I do prefer the 35, but I used the 50 a little more after this video and man...it’s really sharp! Overall though, I’d take the 35. I don’t use clear image zoom really anymore since I love RAW photos vs jpeg. Also I really want to do a video comparing the Sigma 30mm.
It may be in another video, one of the tips and tricks. However I can tell you what I have later. The main ones I use all the time is focus area, face detection, jpg/raw, and focus mode. Those come to mind immediately.
That's a great video. I have a Sony A6100 with the kit lens and wanna buy the Sony lens for more bokeh and sharp pictures. But, also I wanna keep it as an investment. Which one should I take? Any suggestion? TIA
If you want more bokeh, and sharpness. I think the 50mm is better in both aspects, but it’s a little less useful for me, as I’m inside a lot and maybe don’t have room to step back.
@@kyletaggart thank you. But I found out on TH-cam that people recommend 35mm instead of 50mm.. In Indonesia, the price is $60 different. Please help me to choose.. :D
It's a superior lens yes, in sharpness and IQ, however if you need the range of 16-50, then the kit lens is better. It's all about what you want to shoot and what lens would fit that need!
Hi Kyle! Good stuff! I’m still torn between which one to buy first. Sorry for being OCD but you could add this video to your “Lens Comparison” playlist? Thank you kindly!
Is the 35mm not recommended for cityscape? If not, what do you recommend? My budget is $450 😕. I have a great amount of followers, but I'm using the kit lens, so I believe my followers deserve sharper photos. I wouldn't mind something versatile for a portrait as well.
The Sigma 16mm is regarded as a sharp lens, and it’s a great lens. I’ve done a review on it. If you want cheaper, you can look at Rokinon and Samyang 12mm. It was on sale Black Friday with a 64gb memory card for free.
You are correct and it didn't come with a lens hood when I bought it. I got that one off amazon I believe. While I like that it is metal, I don't like that it screws in vs attaching like the petal one you have cause you can't put the lens cap on it with that hood on it. Takes great pics though. Your reasons for it not being a great lens is the same reasons I have. For what I mainly shoot, which is car photography, I got the amazing Sigma 30mm 1.4. From the reviews I have seen it is even a better lens than your Sony 35mm. Glad I you liked using it and I could help you out with seeing how it does.
Ok so I can’t find someone asking this question anywhere but I have a sigma 35 1.4 and when I upload on Instagram I always have to crop losing the integrity of my photo and gaining the ugly borders...will a 50mm correct this issue?
No, it's the aspect ratio. When you post a landscape (horizontal) photo, it's fine, instagram doesn't crop a landscape photo (only on the grid). However when you post a portrait (vertical) photo instagram has a max aspect ratio of 4:5. In instagram the square is a 1:1 ratio, but then the max is 4:5 when you hit the expand option on a photo. Your entire portrait style photo will not fit that though. You can insert your photo into other apps that apply a border and preserve the aspect ratio and the entire photo, but when uploading directly into instagram your photo is going to be cropped to 4:5. Hope this helps! Usually when I know I want a photo for instagram, I typically step back slightly bc I know it will be cropped later on.
Hi i have 55mm 210 lens and a kit lens for my Sony a6000....i need a portrait lens which could also be used for various purposes....should i choose 50mm 1.8 or sigma 30mm 1.4 as i have limited budget
Great video on the 35mm and 50mm. I always liked the 50mm for portraits because it has a specific look. I went back and forth for a couple months between the two at one point. Thank you for the detailed video. Nice photos with the 35mm by the way
I just bought a Sony a6000 I want it to take good pictures of my car, what lens do you think will be the best one for my under $100 y now I’m asking for too much but if I have to buy an adapter mount to fit it is fine please let me know and if used is fine
1 year ago, i liked 35mm, but i have 1 year with 18-105 f4 so i think i need a lens that is so different because 18-105 mm is a multi-use lens so i will take 50mm
The advantage of a screw-in lens hood is that you can screw a CPL filter onto the lens and the hood into the front threads of the filter. Then to rotate the filter all you need to do is twist the hood...
yeah saw that recently. Think that's it's full retail price, but for a long time it was $250. Was looking last night and Amazon actually has it for $305 if you go to used. I think they sell certified renewed versions for $50 off. The Sony 35mm f1.8 also went back to full price recently as well.
Just bought my 50mm last week for my a6000 and can’t wait to try it out! Was considering my next lens to be the sigma 30mm 1.4 a little cheaper then the Sony 35mm and it’s almost the same focal length
18-105 f4. Thats the most versatile option. The other two sigma contemporary lenses are phenomenal choices too. No OSS, but they are great. Signs 16mm f1.4 and 30mm f1.4.
Yes I would. The advancements in the a6100 are great, but the a6000 for photography is a nice camera - if you find it used in good condition, you should be able to get a great price. The 35mm f1.8 is still great, mo question there. 👍🏻
Hey Kyle. Great content as always. I only have the kit lens and I'm only happy with the image quality when there's plenty of light. I've tried the 35mm but still not very excited with the quality. What's your opinion between sel35f18, sel50f18, sigma 30mm 1.4 and sigma 16mm f1.4. I mostly use the camera for family photos, portraits and a bit of landscape with people. Could you make a recommendation because I'm basically a beginner but I want that sharpness in my photos.
Thanks! If you’re not seeing great sharpness with the Sony 35mm f1.8, then I’m not sure what your opinion would be on the other lenses. I love that lens and it’s sharp in my opinion. If you’re doing family shots, and landscape the 50mm would no doubt be too tight for that use. It sounds like the Sigma 16mm is a good lens for you. Remember, lenses may not be the sharpest they can be wide open.
They’re the same in regards to low light, both have the same largest aperture of 1.8. The bokeh being “better” on the 50mm is due to the focal length and the lens compression.
I haven’t used the 30mm, but you can’t go wrong with either. Depends if you want slightly wider and better lowlight (30mm) or Sony brand, slightly more reach, OSS, and probably slightly faster focus with the Sony 35mm.
Ok question for ya. I have owned a Sony A7 and the 50mm lens for a while. I just received the 35mm in the mail and did the ‘same picture from the same spot’ test…. Pictures look identical. Any idea how this could be?!
The APS-C 35mm f1.8 has a full frame equivalent field of view of 52.5mm. It’s possible you didn’t get the FE (full frame 35mm f1.8.). The FE version doesn’t have OSS. If your lens has Optical Steady Shot labeled on it, then you got the APS-C version.
2.8 vs 1.8 is definitely a discernible difference, but it’s not worlds different. Hard to explain I guess. I haven’t used a 50mm f2.8, is this a full frame lens you’re referencing?
@@kyletaggart the Sony 50mm macro is technically full frame but fits the APS-C like a 70mm. Crazy good macro but for low light it’s terrible. I’m looking to get either the 35mm or 50mm 1.8 oss. The 35 is more versatile but the 50 just makes the subjects “pop” more IMO.
The 50mm does make subjects pop more, it’s actually a lens I don’t own, I was lent it, and I think about it all the time. I own the 35mm and will never sell it or get rid of it, I just enjoy it that much. I think they’re two lenses worth having for a Sony APSC shooter who does portrait and street.
Honestly, the lens you have now is the better video lens. Prime lenses are a little more niche for filming. A zoom gives you much more flexibility. Plus that zoom lens has the power zoom.
hikyletaggart Thanks for reply. I’m thinking about “bokeh” but my lens gives me f4. So I’m thinking about 35mm 1.8. Should I buy? Or it’s not necessary?
For video if you’re filming at f1.8 it’s going to be a shallow focus plane. You never know until you try though! There are a bunch of manual lenses at 35mm f1.7/1.8 on Amazon. Maybe try one of those out first. The 35mm f1.8 is a great lens, and it has OSS.
I’ve got the 50mm and cause of the whole crop sensor thing and the situations I’ve been in, I’ve found myself needing space more often. unless I’m doing a photo shoot then the 50mm seems better. Thank you for posting this video!
Thankyou for helping me to buy my first camera sony a6000 I have doubt though, there is a lag in focusing time and sometimes the camera does not focus anything when it is attached to 55-210 mm kit lens What should i do?
Lag in focus time? Not sure what that means, but! I’d try different focus modes. Wide, center, zone, and flex spot. See what works best for your type of photography.
It’s because the camera is having trouble focusing because there isn’t enough light. With the 55-210 it can only go so low with its aperture. The lower the aperture number the more light that gets let in. So, you have to either shoot at a slower shutter speed or higher ISO to bring in more light and to allow the camera to see/focus better.
Plz plz help me! I am thinking of buying a A6000. In Holland the kit come with 16-50mm lens. I am thinking of buying a 1.8 50mm lens to. Is this een good camera to shoot nu daughter at her gymnastics games? Plz help me
It certainly can be, it can shoot 11 frames per second and you can grab the moment. However not sure that would be enough reach to get the moments. If you get the kit lens it goes to 50mm, so you can see if that will be good enough, then get the 50mm f1.8 for better quality shots. ✌🏻
Good review. It’s so funny I saw your other video of the 35mm f/1.8 and it was awesome! Loved the comparison. I decided to go with 35mm f/1.8 because it wasn’t too tight and wasn’t too close. The 50mm is just “too close” and it is not meant for some types of photography, especially street photography. I’d recommend the kit lens to 35mm for street photos. I can’t wait to upgrade my camera to the Full Frame one day. Oh Sony, if you weren’t so expensive.
@@kyletaggart Yeah, outdoors you might get lucky with the kit but you don't use it anymore either. It was just my mistake and I hope others don't make the same mistake.
Just buy some quality glass for your Sony Apsc camera, the Sony FF cameras are mega expensive and their native glass is also mega pricey...Sigma, even in the FF area offers a quality and cheaper choice, but Sony FF cameras and lens put photography out of the financial reach of many, many people. IMHO, the A9 is priced for pros only.
Sir pls tell which lens is best for cinematography 16mm vs 35mm vs 50mm in a6400. And also which lens is best for all purpose work like portrait, landscape.. pls tell......👍🙏🙏. I want to buy a single lens from this options to fulfill all this work.. so pls tell. But my Orginal work are cinematography and portrait.
hikyletaggart okay, my only thing about the kit lens is after I transferred the videos over to my computer I seem to loose some of the quality of the video. The video doesn't look as HD/ clear on my computer as it did on my camera. Do you have any ideas on how I can improve the video quality? And thank you so so much for responding back to me
Just gonna be resolution. When looking at things on a larger screen (higher resolution) it still has the same quality but you can see it more clearly if that makes sense. For video the XAVCS is the best codec to use, 1080p.
The kit lens isn’t the sharpest lens in the world. So other lenses would provide sharper results. There is the 10-18 f4, but I’m in the fence on that lens. The sigma 16mm is awesome, but it’s not ideal for walk around type videos, but sit down videos it’s perfect.
Which do you prefer? Honestly after making this video I realized how sharp and awesome the 50mm is, BUT , I still prefer the 35mm. Two awesome lenses!
I love the 35mm f1.8 since it is more versatile as you said 👍👍 we only need one or two lenses that serve many purposes 😂.. Nice Video Kyle
Still loving my 35mm f1.8 ❤
My 35mm never takes a bad shot
I love my 50mm for concert photography. It gets right up in the performers face; however I’m purchasing the 35mm next to be able to capture more of the performer and to be more versatile with my street photography.
I’d also suggest taking a look at the sigma 16mm for concert photography. You could get in the face of a singer and possible get the band in too for a unique look! Thanks for checking the video out Brittany!
Thank you for actually showing examples of what the pictures look like vs talk for an hour and never actually show side by side comparisons. This video is exactly what I was looking for.
Boom! Thanks for watching
I've used the 35mm for about a year. Takes fantastic photos. I believe that the 35 is more flexible unless you want the 50mm for portrait shots only.
Almost two years later and this info is still very useful!
For engagement reference, I basically just came to this video to see the visual comparison of the photos. It's great that you did an indoor/close up shot and an outdoor/portrait shot. I'm looking at these for food photography and videography.
Better depth of field with the 50mm. However the 35mm can be used in more situations. 👍🏻
I just double check, it does come with a hood. The hood does not the use 49mm thread. Hood is a alc-sh116.
I have no wife to control my spending
Charles Wendt amen brother
@@evrenozcan I would give away all my stuff to get Mary back, the Lord let me share her life for over 33 years before she passed.
Charles Wendt Someone who loves us, will miss us.
I am a beginner. I watched lot of reviews on TH-cam. They all recommended 35mm. And why I bought it few weeks ago. Thx
My 50mm came with a hood, which is about twice as deep as the screw on one you had. I’m sure I read somewhere years ago that often hood shapes/sizes are specific to the lens due the way light might be reflected, so the other style may not work on the 50mm.
Ryan Prince I can confirm this. I use the 50mm on my A6000, beautiful lense by the way. And it did indeed come with a lensehood.
@@TuenStudios hi man i consedring to buy thé 50 mm what you advice me
@@FAHAMNI Go ahead get the Sony 1.8 if u you want to! It's great. I still use it A LOT. Or if you have a bigger budget I'd look at Sigmas 58mm 1.4 contemporary. It's quite heavy and huge tho.
@@TuenStudios that is the problème thé budget and which caméra you use
Glad there are still people like you who do this kind of stuff! Big help!
Thanks! More to come!!
2:38 It does come with a lens hood which is about 60% the size of the lens. I wear mine upside down on the lens and it protects it from scratches.
That's pointless, it's supposed to shade the lens element.
I reverse the hood when not using it as well. I love the design. Versatile!
@@SideshowBob44 the point is that the hood protects the lens from scratches when not using the hood for sun etc. What evidence suggests it’s pointless?
Top 5 must have apsc Sony lens (starter)
Sony 50MM f/1.8 oss
Sony 35MM f/1.8 oss
Sony 10-18MM f4 oss
Sony 55-210MM f4.5 oss
Sony g 90 2.8MM f2.8 oss
These 5 lens will hold down any apsc user at any focal length until they are ready for gm lens.
Tamron 17-70MM f2.8 vc us the must have upgrade to the kit lens for any apsc user as well.
Awesome video
Comparing apples and oranges. The lenses belong to two different categories. The 50 is a tele photo lens so the right thing to do would to compare it to other tele photo lenses. While you could use the 35 as your sole lens, that is not possible with the 50. It has nothing to do with being a beginner or not. First one needs a wide angle lens. The classic accompanying lens to a moderate wide is a moderate tele, in full format 35mm and a 85mm. For some people perhaps 28 / 50 (full format) is better. It’s a matter of taste.
hi just bought f1.8 50mm and it comes with a small hood, thank for you videos, your help has been great
at 8:31 the 50mm looks sharper where they at the same aperture, did you notice that ?
The 50 is sharper for sure actually.
But if I'm right (correct me if I'm wrong) that 50mm lens on crop sensor camera (a6000) is like 75mm on full frame? So you need around 32mm on crop if you want same results as 50mm on full?
Yo man, just found out about ur channel and it’s awesome, love the camera content, I also love it as a hobby just as you do! Keep it up!
Thanks man! Appreciate it very much Alex.
My only question is if the photos at same settings are the samw bright or if 35mm is brighter. (Both at F1.8)
I am just watching the video so I dom't know yet if it gets covered.
Yo dude.. name and lent u use on those video?
Sigma 16mm f1.4 is why I film all my TH-cam videos with. I use the Sony 35mm f1.8 for b roll mostly.
Thanks for the video! I will be saving up for 35mm. You really helped me to decide which is the best option for me.
Awesome!
I bought the 50mm at best buy for $199.99. great video
Nice deal!
Me too
Good timing, been considering the 35mm for ages + pay day yesterday!
Sickkkkk. Go for it!
I hope you can help me out with this question. I’m just getting into photography and I’m debating whether to buy the Sony A6000, Nikon d5600 or the Canon T7. What do you recommend for a beginner? I want to use it for TH-cam videos and taking pictures of my daughters dance recitals. Please help, thank you.
I don’t like DSLR’s at this point anymore, so I’d recommend the Sony a6000. But for TH-cam it has quirks. No microphone input, and it overheats when doing more than 20 min of video. The a6000 is the only mirrorless you mention, and mirrorless are smaller, lighter, and have electronic viewfinders. An electronic viewfinder is where you look I. The viewfinder and it’s just like a screen, much like a phone, and you can change settings and see. The changes. On a DSLR you cannot see changes or even how a photo looks until you take it and then review it on the back screen. DSLR’s May have better battery life than the a6000, and a swivel screen, but they’re slower in shooting speed, heavier, and being phased out. Doesn’t mean a DSLR isn’t the camera for you. I work with canon t7’s at my job and they work fine, they do take good images, but I myself prefer a smaller, lighter, and better featured camera in the a6000. I film all my TH-cam videos with the a6000 but I use an external mic, and I stop recording at 15ish minutes and restart because I know the camera overheats around 20 min. Hopefully some of this helps!
I think it all comes down to the types of photographs you like taking. I think that for portraits the 50 mm is a really good lens. You get great shots without having to either crop them afterwards or being so close that your sitter may feel uncomfortable. For general photography, I think the 35 mm is probably better; I don’t own and probably won’t buy it as I have the 50 mm and the 30 mm f3.5 macro.
Agreed about spacing, forgot to mention that. Good point!
I'm considering that 35mm. Thanks for the info.
Checkout my review on it as well. Such an awesome lens!
I have both of these lenses, and my 50mm is my go-to lens almost always.
Really late here. But I just got the camera with both lenses used on eBay. Absolute beginner and very excited. Great video. Helped me to figure out what they can do. Thanks a lot.
Lots more vids! Any questions, just comment. I try and respond to most comments. 😊👍🏻
I'm Thai and know not much about lens , but you make this video clearly thank you 3 time.
Awesome!!
if i photograph my dog and stuff and sometimes street photography would the 50mm be good for it?
Yes, but a 35mm might be better. 50mm can be quite zoomed in for indoor pet photos.
I have both and like both - just use them in different circumstances. I wish Sony would release a comparably priced, sized and quality APS-C 23mm f1.8 with OSS to complement these 2 lenses.
i have 35mm and confused in between sony 50mm and Sigma 56mm. so help me please ?
@@IRFAN-po5sz they are both good. Which is better for you depends on which camera you have and what conditions you shoot in. The 50mm has stabilization (OSS) so it's good if your camera does not have in body stabilization and you shoot hand held. If you use a tripod, shoot in dark conditions, have IBIS in your camera or really want shallow depth of field then the 56mm Sigma would be better for you.
Well said!!
@@gabithemagyar Thanks for your comprehensive answer. Actually i have Sony A6400 and i never use tripod. So Sony 50mm oss will better for as you said. One thing i observed that many A6400 owners getting Sigma 56mm instead of 50mm they claim that higher shutter speed is alternative of IBIS . Is it true ?Why everybody (a6400) owner praising Sigma even without tripod usage. ?
The 35 is good enough for me for street photography. I tried the 50, it was too cramped and difficult to compose a photo. But really depends on what genre you're doing.
Agreed! I was shocked by the quality it produces, but yeah, sometimes you don’t have the space to step back!
hikyletaggart yes that happened once to me ,The space was the problem
I shoot cars what do you think
7:22 is what you came for
Thanks for the video, I had the 50mm it was really zoomed in so I sold it for the 35mm, this definitely is the right focal length.
Nice! Sometimes ya just gotta try it out!
@@kyletaggart I know but it was just too zoomed in almost unusable at home!
Late to the party but here goes.
I have a sony a6300 with 85mm 1.8 fe and sigma 30mm 1.4 (love them both). I am considering replacing them with sony 18-105 f4 and 50mm 1.8 (for a more versatile and oss combo). Will I miss my primes? Hard decision :)
What do you think?
Primes do offer typically a better sharpness at their fixed focal length, compared to a zoom, but zooms offer a wide array of possibilities. It really depends on your style. I will say I love the Sony 50mm f1.8.
So long not to see you here. It's a great to see you sharing this great video. Thanks bro!
Life’s been hectic, but BIG stuff coming!
Hi nice video! Do you also use clear image zoom? I have a new a6400 and 35 1.8 and I was thinking about either buying the 50 1.8 or just use the clear image zoom with the 35... Do you think is there a loss in the final quality? I shoot mainly videos. Thanks!
There isn’t much loss in good light. However the 50 is a fantastic lens and really sharp. For video I would try clear image zoom first, and if it doesn’t meet your standards look into the 50mm.
Both of these lenses one year later are about $100 more in price, than your state in your video. I am new to photography and am not familiar with how the "market" works, so to speak. Is it normal for lenses to go up in price in such an extreme amount?
Fluctuations of $50 is pretty normal for a lens. If it’s on Amazon prices can vary from week to week to month to month. Like right now the Canon M50 is $150 off it’s normal price on Amazon. I always suggest checking the used section on amazon - the link below the item details! When researching you’ll kind of gauge the full price and then keep an eye on it from there. I use the honey add on for certain stuff I don’t wanna miss out on.
@@kyletaggart thanks for your response. Just bought the a6000 recently and have been watching a lot of your videos. Great content. Cheers!
Thanks Scott! Happy to help 😎
Missed your videos! I have the 50mm and absolutely love it but I do wish it wasn’t so zoomed in at times. Definitely want to get the 35mm next! Thanks for comparing the two!! Very informative!
Hey there! I’m back in action. Thanks for sticking with me and I’m glad you liked it!
Not to contradict anything Kyle said, but check out the Sigma 30mm. If you look at comparison stuff on youtube most everyone I have found likes the Sigma better. Just letting you know so you can compare yourself.
travis branum always open to any recommendations! I’ll definitely compare the two! Thanks! :)
You will be well served by both the 35 1.8 and 50 1.8.
Hi! Im first time watching your video! Cause today i got a 35mm f1.8 lens🎉 So i need some tutorial reviews. Thank you so much for shared and compared👍
Anytime! Thanks for the support
Not really I have used 50mm for the past 2 years for everything and it’s super useful. But got the sigma 30mm and I’m in love with both
Might be a dumb question.... but are the 35 mm and 50 mm considered prime lenses? New to photography and trying to learn all the terms ;)
Yup! Any lens that is a fixed focal length, it’s a considered a “prime” lens. 👍🏻
I have the 50mm 1.8OSS, now I would like to buy the 35mm to use it on gimbal, does it make sense?
suppose if you want a little bit wider, sure. All about what you need to get the shots you want!
@@kyletaggart ok, thanks
the 50mm 1.8 is $350 right now on amazon. Why did the price go up??
Interesting. Not sure. I think it fluctuates for that lens honestly. I typically see it at $300 or sometimes lower somehow. It’s an awesome lens though.
@@kyletaggart I just picked it up used in excellent condition for $220. Im in love with it!
I love my Sigma 30mm 1.4 it's a little bit wider than the 35mm which really helps for general purpose or indoor shots, it's cheaper faster and sharper than the 35..
But it has worse autofocus and no OSS.
@@drummerdude100 true. what you choose depends on your priorities
Wich one would you recommend for street photography ? I already have a 85mm
The 35mm f1.8.
I am looking for a good lens to take pictures of my dog. A friend of mine has an 85mm for her full frame camera and makes the most beautiful pictures. So I guess the 50mm is great?
Sounds like you might prefer the 35mm focal length. It is more convenient for a lot of things - especially indoors (the 50mm is often too close). Have you tried the 28mm f/2 or the 30mm signma against the 35mm? Or tried using the 35mm using the in-camera zoom mode to give you a similar view as the 50mm?
I do prefer the 35, but I used the 50 a little more after this video and man...it’s really sharp! Overall though, I’d take the 35. I don’t use clear image zoom really anymore since I love RAW photos vs jpeg. Also I really want to do a video comparing the Sigma 30mm.
Are you interested in buying any new primes? I heard of the 28mm f2 and I’m curious on how good it is.
Do you have a video showing what you have on your upper and lower row on your function button
It may be in another video, one of the tips and tricks. However I can tell you what I have later. The main ones I use all the time is focus area, face detection, jpg/raw, and focus mode. Those come to mind immediately.
Cheers
That's a great video. I have a Sony A6100 with the kit lens and wanna buy the Sony lens for more bokeh and sharp pictures. But, also I wanna keep it as an investment. Which one should I take? Any suggestion? TIA
If you want more bokeh, and sharpness. I think the 50mm is better in both aspects, but it’s a little less useful for me, as I’m inside a lot and maybe don’t have room to step back.
@@kyletaggart thank you. But I found out on TH-cam that people recommend 35mm instead of 50mm.. In Indonesia, the price is $60 different. Please help me to choose.. :D
@@ciciliajuliyanti5968 portraits, go with the 50mm, everything else, go with the 35mm. :)
@@kyletaggart I think I will take 35mm. Thanks for your help.
Bam! Just ordered the 35mm using your link. Thanks Kyle for the time and effort you put into the videos.
Wow thank you so much! Enjoy that beast and hope you enjoy it!
hikyletaggart enjoy enjoying that beast, enjoy using that joy of a lens! Enjoy!
Does it has crop factor from 35mm to 52,5mm?
Great video man. Is sony 35mm f1.8 OSS much more superior in video than kit lens? I'm 50/50 on taking photos and videos. Thank you
It's a superior lens yes, in sharpness and IQ, however if you need the range of 16-50, then the kit lens is better. It's all about what you want to shoot and what lens would fit that need!
@@kyletaggart Thanks a lot for super fast reply. Have a good day man.
Anytime. 👍🏻
Hi Kyle! Good stuff! I’m still torn between which one to buy first.
Sorry for being OCD but you could add this video to your “Lens Comparison” playlist? Thank you kindly!
Haha for sure! Thanks for the catch.
Is the 35mm not recommended for cityscape? If not, what do you recommend? My budget is $450 😕. I have a great amount of followers, but I'm using the kit lens, so I believe my followers deserve sharper photos. I wouldn't mind something versatile for a portrait as well.
The Sigma 16mm is regarded as a sharp lens, and it’s a great lens. I’ve done a review on it. If you want cheaper, you can look at Rokinon and Samyang 12mm. It was on sale Black Friday with a 64gb memory card for free.
@@kyletaggart done! I'm buying it right now on Amazon!
@@jr-uu8eg if you use a link from my video that'd be dope! if not no worries at all.
I love the way you made the comparison!
Thanks!’
You are correct and it didn't come with a lens hood when I bought it. I got that one off amazon I believe. While I like that it is metal, I don't like that it screws in vs attaching like the petal one you have cause you can't put the lens cap on it with that hood on it. Takes great pics though. Your reasons for it not being a great lens is the same reasons I have. For what I mainly shoot, which is car photography, I got the amazing Sigma 30mm 1.4. From the reviews I have seen it is even a better lens than your Sony 35mm. Glad I you liked using it and I could help you out with seeing how it does.
Thanks man, it’s been fun using it and I’m quite stunned by the sharpness and quality.
Is the 35mm also good for astrophotography and vlogging?
It’s a little too zoomed in/tight for both. However you could use it for Astro. Vlogging it would be tough. You’d need a selfie stick or short tripod.
Ok so I can’t find someone asking this question anywhere but I have a sigma 35 1.4 and when I upload on Instagram I always have to crop losing the integrity of my photo and gaining the ugly borders...will a 50mm correct this issue?
No, it's the aspect ratio. When you post a landscape (horizontal) photo, it's fine, instagram doesn't crop a landscape photo (only on the grid). However when you post a portrait (vertical) photo instagram has a max aspect ratio of 4:5. In instagram the square is a 1:1 ratio, but then the max is 4:5 when you hit the expand option on a photo. Your entire portrait style photo will not fit that though. You can insert your photo into other apps that apply a border and preserve the aspect ratio and the entire photo, but when uploading directly into instagram your photo is going to be cropped to 4:5. Hope this helps! Usually when I know I want a photo for instagram, I typically step back slightly bc I know it will be cropped later on.
Thank you!
Hi i have 55mm 210 lens and a kit lens for my Sony a6000....i need a portrait lens which could also be used for various purposes....should i choose 50mm 1.8 or sigma 30mm 1.4 as i have limited budget
The better portrait lens is the Sony 50mm f1.8, but the better overall lens would be the sigma 30mm f1.4.
Finally bought the 50mm!!! So happy
Congrats!
Great video on the 35mm and 50mm. I always liked the 50mm for portraits because it has a specific look. I went back and forth for a couple months between the two at one point. Thank you for the detailed video. Nice photos with the 35mm by the way
Thanks so much!
I just bought a Sony a6000 I want it to take good pictures of my car, what lens do you think will be the best one for my under $100 y now I’m asking for too much but if I have to buy an adapter mount to fit it is fine please let me know and if used is fine
Checkout my manual lens video $(all under 100)
If I have the 50mm... should I consider buying the 35mm? The 50 is often too cropped
100%. I also did a dedicated review on the 35mm :)
hikyletaggart so should I sell my 50mm then? Or hold both?
Thanks!
1 year ago, i liked 35mm, but i have 1 year with 18-105 f4 so i think i need a lens that is so different because 18-105 mm is a multi-use lens so i will take 50mm
The advantage of a screw-in lens hood is that you can screw a CPL filter onto the lens and the hood into the front threads of the filter. Then to rotate the filter all you need to do is twist the hood...
What’s up with the price jump on the 50mm, now they are $348 from your link.
yeah saw that recently. Think that's it's full retail price, but for a long time it was $250. Was looking last night and Amazon actually has it for $305 if you go to used. I think they sell certified renewed versions for $50 off. The Sony 35mm f1.8 also went back to full price recently as well.
I missed out. I was ready to pull the trigger after watching your video and then was bummed to see that price jump. I’ll hunt around. Thanks man.
I see it on eBay for $219 ish. I’m thinking about it as well as I had that one for the video lent to me.
Considering the price I’ll go for Sigma 30mm 1.4 and Sony 50mm 1.8
Not a bad duo!!
That's what I have and both are great choices. The 30mm stays on my camera 90 percent of the time as it really is a great all around lens.
Video starts at 7:23 thank me later
Thanks so much omg!! 🤣
@@kyletaggart lol no problem xD
Just bought my 50mm last week for my a6000 and can’t wait to try it out! Was considering my next lens to be the sigma 30mm 1.4 a little cheaper then the Sony 35mm and it’s almost the same focal length
Yes! Great alternative! Also I’m shocked by the 50mm honestly. It’s awesome.
The 30mm is an amazing lens and the best all around, on the go lens in my opinion.
i have sony a6400 and sigma 56mm 1.4 but i need one video lens which one should I buy please give me your suggestion?
18-105 f4. Thats the most versatile option. The other two sigma contemporary lenses are phenomenal choices too. No OSS, but they are great. Signs 16mm f1.4 and 30mm f1.4.
Can you list all the Settings with each lens that you use please. Like 35 Aperture mode 1.8 ISO…. So on
In 2021 would you still recommend this camera and 35mm?
Yes I would. The advancements in the a6100 are great, but the a6000 for photography is a nice camera - if you find it used in good condition, you should be able to get a great price. The 35mm f1.8 is still great, mo question there. 👍🏻
Great side-by-side photo comparison!
thanks! :D
Hey Kyle. Great content as always. I only have the kit lens and I'm only happy with the image quality when there's plenty of light. I've tried the 35mm but still not very excited with the quality. What's your opinion between sel35f18, sel50f18, sigma 30mm 1.4 and sigma 16mm f1.4. I mostly use the camera for family photos, portraits and a bit of landscape with people. Could you make a recommendation because I'm basically a beginner but I want that sharpness in my photos.
Thanks! If you’re not seeing great sharpness with the Sony 35mm f1.8, then I’m not sure what your opinion would be on the other lenses. I love that lens and it’s sharp in my opinion. If you’re doing family shots, and landscape the 50mm would no doubt be too tight for that use. It sounds like the Sigma 16mm is a good lens for you. Remember, lenses may not be the sharpest they can be wide open.
Helpful man♥️ lots of love keep going all the best😍👏
Thanks! So happy to help
@@kyletaggart really crystal clear explanation u did brother thnq once again
Since the bokeh is better in the 50mm, in low light it will be extremely more useful in those scenario?
They’re the same in regards to low light, both have the same largest aperture of 1.8. The bokeh being “better” on the 50mm is due to the focal length and the lens compression.
@@kyletaggart Yes it's due to the focal length. Thank you.
Really good comparison, the 35mm looks great! Now to work out how to afford it...
I’d check camera shops. Sometimes you can find great deals there, and checkout used stuff in your hands instead of reading an online description.
I've bought 16mm f1.4. And I'm planning to get one of these but I'm confuse which one will I buy. I nese your help!
Need to know your questions! I made the video to help’
@@kyletaggart Which one should I purchase first, 18-105mm or 35mm/50mm?
@@vicentebuslon8921 I would always buy ths 18-105 first.
Which version the 50mm lens is? Full frame or APSC?
For a6000 series cameras, I highly suggest the APSC version. It’s smaller, quicker auto focus, and better suited for the cameras
Thanks for your reply!! 😁
I’m using a6000 can the 50mm give large images is what I’m looking for
Large images? Not sure what that means. It’s an Awesome lens but it’s not very wide. You have to step back a few feet in most situations.
then I go for the 50mm and step back because I love big images
@@atafit4913 do you mean wide not big?
Sony 35mm 1.8 or sigma 30mm 1.4. Which one is better for everything.
I haven’t used the 30mm, but you can’t go wrong with either. Depends if you want slightly wider and better lowlight (30mm) or Sony brand, slightly more reach, OSS, and probably slightly faster focus with the Sony 35mm.
Ok question for ya. I have owned a Sony A7 and the 50mm lens for a while. I just received the 35mm in the mail and did the ‘same picture from the same spot’ test…. Pictures look identical. Any idea how this could be?!
The APS-C 35mm f1.8 has a full frame equivalent field of view of 52.5mm. It’s possible you didn’t get the FE (full frame 35mm f1.8.). The FE version doesn’t have OSS. If your lens has Optical Steady Shot labeled on it, then you got the APS-C version.
The price is also much different between the APSC and full frame 35mm.
How similar is the 50mm 1.8 oss to the 50mm 2.8 macro lens on an aps-c? Do those 2 stops DOF make that much of a difference?
2.8 vs 1.8 is definitely a discernible difference, but it’s not worlds different. Hard to explain I guess. I haven’t used a 50mm f2.8, is this a full frame lens you’re referencing?
@@kyletaggart the Sony 50mm macro is technically full frame but fits the APS-C like a 70mm. Crazy good macro but for low light it’s terrible. I’m looking to get either the 35mm or 50mm 1.8 oss. The 35 is more versatile but the 50 just makes the subjects “pop” more IMO.
The 50mm does make subjects pop more, it’s actually a lens I don’t own, I was lent it, and I think about it all the time. I own the 35mm and will never sell it or get rid of it, I just enjoy it that much. I think they’re two lenses worth having for a Sony APSC shooter who does portrait and street.
@@kyletaggart thanks for the tips. I’m definitely gonna buy both in the near future. Probably the 35mm first.
What would you say about the Sony 50mm f/1.8 vs the Sigma 56mm f/1.4 as far as shooting in that focal range?
I’d go with the sigma, I’d love to try it out! More bokeh and I’ve heard it’s sharp as heck.
But sigma doesn't have OSS, a super effective function for both stills and videos
Hello, thanks for the great video! I've got 18-105 f4 on a6500. But for the cinematic videos, 35mm 1.8 or 50mm 1.8? Thanks again!
Honestly, the lens you have now is the better video lens. Prime lenses are a little more niche for filming. A zoom gives you much more flexibility. Plus that zoom lens has the power zoom.
hikyletaggart Thanks for reply. I’m thinking about “bokeh” but my lens gives me f4. So I’m thinking about 35mm 1.8. Should I buy? Or it’s not necessary?
For video if you’re filming at f1.8 it’s going to be a shallow focus plane. You never know until you try though! There are a bunch of manual lenses at 35mm f1.7/1.8 on Amazon. Maybe try one of those out first. The 35mm f1.8 is a great lens, and it has OSS.
hikyletaggart Thank you very much! I’ve got low budget. I think I can move on with my lens as you said. Maybe later I can buy one 1.8-1.7 lens :)
Actually this is what I was looking for.. thnxxxxx
Happy to help!
I’ve got the 50mm and cause of the whole crop sensor thing and the situations I’ve been in, I’ve found myself needing space more often. unless I’m doing a photo shoot then the 50mm seems better. Thank you for posting this video!
35 is better same problem i had
So which is good for video can you please suggest me one??? Thank you
35 is less zoomed in, I’d say that, or get the 18-105mm f4 G lens.
Thankyou for helping me to buy my first camera sony a6000
I have doubt though, there is a lag in focusing time and sometimes the camera does not focus anything when it is attached to 55-210 mm kit lens
What should i do?
Lag in focus time? Not sure what that means, but! I’d try different focus modes. Wide, center, zone, and flex spot. See what works best for your type of photography.
In low light conditions the camera takes a lot of time to focus even in zone and center mode.. Is it ok? Or an issue with the new camera?
It’s because the camera is having trouble focusing because there isn’t enough light. With the 55-210 it can only go so low with its aperture. The lower the aperture number the more light that gets let in. So, you have to either shoot at a slower shutter speed or higher ISO to bring in more light and to allow the camera to see/focus better.
Ok.. Thanks!!!
What’s the 50mm like on an APS-C sensor, as it’s a full frame lens.
This is an APSC 50mm f1.8. Sony makes an FE version too.
@@kyletaggart really? That looks like the full frame version of the lens
@@scvgoalkeeping Nope, this is the APS-C, 100%.
Hey. Have you had a play with the samyang 45mm 1.8f? Wonder how that compares?
I have not, but I’d love to try it out.
Plz plz help me! I am thinking of buying a A6000. In Holland the kit come with 16-50mm lens. I am thinking of buying a 1.8 50mm lens to. Is this een good camera to shoot nu daughter at her gymnastics games?
Plz help me
It certainly can be, it can shoot 11 frames per second and you can grab the moment. However not sure that would be enough reach to get the moments. If you get the kit lens it goes to 50mm, so you can see if that will be good enough, then get the 50mm f1.8 for better quality shots. ✌🏻
@@kyletaggart omg thank you so so much.
Why did the price for both of these lens shoot up...
What’s a good lens for vlogging on the Sony A6400 ? Please help
Kit lens is decent 16-50 and has stabilization. Ultimate is probably the 10-18 f4.
I sold the 35mm and wish I kept it!! Grabs focus better in darker conditions... Feels way more versatile then the 50mm
Can always grab another!
hi, I've just bought my Sony 50mm f1.8 lens. just wanna ask if is it normal that the zoom of it does not work. thanks
It’s not a zoom lens. It’s a fixed focal length of 50mm.
Would be cool to see you compare the sigma 30 1.4 to the Sony 35 1.8
I wish but I don’t have the sigma. Look up Arthur R’s video on it, he did a nice job.
Hey no problem! This vid was a big help!
Good review. It’s so funny I saw your other video of the 35mm f/1.8 and it was awesome! Loved the comparison. I decided to go with 35mm f/1.8 because it wasn’t too tight and wasn’t too close. The 50mm is just “too close” and it is not meant for some types of photography, especially street photography. I’d recommend the kit lens to 35mm for street photos. I can’t wait to upgrade my camera to the Full Frame one day. Oh Sony, if you weren’t so expensive.
Thanks for checking out my stuff! Appreciate it!!
The kit lens is garbage and I may as well pull out my phone. I wish I didn't buy it. 35mm owner here!
I’ve taken some amazing kit lens shots, but mainly landscape. I think it’s with an extra $50
@@kyletaggart Yeah, outdoors you might get lucky with the kit but you don't use it anymore either. It was just my mistake and I hope others don't make the same mistake.
Just buy some quality glass for your Sony Apsc camera, the Sony FF cameras are mega expensive and their native glass is also mega pricey...Sigma, even in the FF area offers a quality and cheaper choice, but Sony FF cameras and lens put photography out of the financial reach of many, many people. IMHO, the A9 is priced for pros only.
Sir pls tell which lens is best for cinematography 16mm vs 35mm vs 50mm in a6400. And also which lens is best for all purpose work like portrait, landscape.. pls tell......👍🙏🙏. I want to buy a single lens from this options to fulfill all this work.. so pls tell. But my Orginal work are cinematography and portrait.
Both are great, the 16mm might be a little more versatile.
Thanks sir 👍👌 lots of love from India and also from me...
Thanks again Kyle!! Great vid!
No thank YOU!
What's a good lens for vlogging with the a6000?
Walk around vlogging? The kit lens! It can zoom out to 16mm and has OSS. For sit down vlogs I’d say the one I use, the Sigma 16mm f1.4.
hikyletaggart okay, my only thing about the kit lens is after I transferred the videos over to my computer I seem to loose some of the quality of the video. The video doesn't look as HD/ clear on my computer as it did on my camera. Do you have any ideas on how I can improve the video quality? And thank you so so much for responding back to me
Just gonna be resolution. When looking at things on a larger screen (higher resolution) it still has the same quality but you can see it more clearly if that makes sense. For video the XAVCS is the best codec to use, 1080p.
The kit lens isn’t the sharpest lens in the world. So other lenses would provide sharper results. There is the 10-18 f4, but I’m in the fence on that lens. The sigma 16mm is awesome, but it’s not ideal for walk around type videos, but sit down videos it’s perfect.
hikyletaggart awesome thank you so so much!!