How much power can turbos and intercooler gain on an Ecoboost F-150?

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ส.ค. 2020
  • In this one, we swap out the factory turbos and intercooler on an 3.5 Ecoboost F-150 for better, more efficient ones! The new turbos are the same size as factory but they have upgraded internals. The new intercooler which is almost twice the size of factory, fits in like a glove to help those new turbos breathe! This job only requires basic work, but yields a pretty fair horsepower gain in return.
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 349

  • @sunroofsimon
    @sunroofsimon 3 ปีที่แล้ว +16

    My buddy just purchased one yesterday! I got my 2020 GT500 9 months ago. Just started a page myself. I admire the work you guys do. Keep it up👍

    • @Thalor
      @Thalor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You got insta bro

    • @sunroofsimon
      @sunroofsimon 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Thalor yes sir @1crazysnake

    • @Memo_0215
      @Memo_0215 ปีที่แล้ว

      Jesus look at that beauty😍blessings brother

  • @tokeypokey
    @tokeypokey 3 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Traded my powerstroke in on a 3.5 Ecoboost and i regret nothing really. Its as fast with $1000 worth of mods as my truck was with $5000 worth of work. Still tows my trailer well and isn't a fucking timebomb

    • @joshuamorris9050
      @joshuamorris9050 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      People just don’t like the way they sound….too stuck in their ways

    • @hidros1461
      @hidros1461 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ecoboost are time bombs as well. Pistons are not forged like they should be. One of my pistons cracked the other day.

    • @brianparker6294
      @brianparker6294 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hidros1461 what year

    • @JesusGarcia98.F
      @JesusGarcia98.F 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@hidros1461 well I’m 110,000 miles in after 3 years and it’s still holding up strong

  • @calvinevans8305
    @calvinevans8305 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    There is never enough room to work on these new vehicles, they package things well, but still those turbos are jammed in there.

    • @Stickerslapper
      @Stickerslapper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It's not terrible
      I just pulled my blown motor and replaced it with a fresh unit, really not bad at all.
      There are a few engineering fork ups, but not too many.

  • @JKZ103
    @JKZ103 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    With a proper tune that thing will be in the mid 400's... I have a gen 2 platinum and did everything but turbos and its a monster. Turbos are next when these crap out! Love the truck stuff!

    • @rrichiie
      @rrichiie ปีที่แล้ว

      What all have you done? I also have a gen 2 and I’m looking for a good place to start for power

    • @tatersguntate2021
      @tatersguntate2021 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@rrichiieget tunes and a tuner from 5 star tuning, they have dyno graphs on their site and my 18 lariat with the 3.5 EcoBoost makes 500whp and 500wtq just with a k&n cold air intake and mbrp 4” installer series exhaust it’s a whole different beast 😎

    • @DameonSellsRealEstate
      @DameonSellsRealEstate 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@tatersguntate2021it’s been a long time since this comment but I have the same set up and I cannot stand how bad the drone is in the cab. Is yours bad too?

  • @johnhoward6551
    @johnhoward6551 ปีที่แล้ว

    I have an 18 3.5 felt 4x4 crew cab.all live done is add the bully dog extreme programer and a Borla cat attack exhaust.I don't know what I have at the back tires but up front looks like about 500 up and 700 ft ponds of torque. Don't know for sure but it is a flat a. Screamer!

  • @tomroe7715
    @tomroe7715 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Got a buddy with a 2014 sho, he dynoed 981 hp. There is a lot more room with the combo installed, it's all about the tune now. Oh I'm svt master cert for 2 decades now. Been around em.

    • @slowfudgeballs9517
      @slowfudgeballs9517 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Turbo's and supers are basically just a proper dyno away from unlimited power. So long as the forced induction components can handle the insane air throughput, it's changing the displacement without increasing the volume of the cylinder. All the while keeping the v6 gas mileage in the low demand scenarios.

  • @stbgn
    @stbgn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I wonder if the factory turbos waste gate was rattling and that's what prompted the owner to upgrade. Im thinking about upgrading both turbos to stop the horrible rattling noise.

    • @raymccurry5556
      @raymccurry5556 ปีที่แล้ว

      If your gonna replace them get upgraded ones.

  • @Wootangtw
    @Wootangtw 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I seen on one video where they were getting 630 hp and 630 torque to the ground on a 3.5 ecoboost with turbo changed and a tune.... thanks for your videos buddy....

    • @mrgcav
      @mrgcav 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Please give mea link to that video.

    • @Wootangtw
      @Wootangtw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrgcav th-cam.com/video/XZeRPe2IOCA/w-d-xo.html

    • @Wootangtw
      @Wootangtw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrgcav th-cam.com/video/XZeRPe2IOCA/w-d-xo.html

    • @Wootangtw
      @Wootangtw 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrgcav did you get that video link of that f150 eccboost

    • @mrgcav
      @mrgcav 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Wootangtw Thanks !

  • @trent1234108
    @trent1234108 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Are these factory High Output parts for the new raptor and limited's 450hp version?

  • @MrCarnutbill67
    @MrCarnutbill67 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Check out Bill Lutz F150 on here. Stock 2019 V8 with twins made over 900 at the tire. Yes, the same Bill Lutz that races Drag radial and no prep.

    • @mrgcav
      @mrgcav 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Please provide a link.

    • @MrCarnutbill67
      @MrCarnutbill67 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@mrgcav
      th-cam.com/video/2Cm5ScVIj6U/w-d-xo.html

    • @mrgcav
      @mrgcav 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrCarnutbill67 Thanks!

  • @r.dfordtech5996
    @r.dfordtech5996 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Love the way he just sent the bolt on the intercooler lol

    • @sama1741
      @sama1741 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Aldo the apache is fearless!😂

  • @tkostang
    @tkostang 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What intercooler? JUST LOOKED SO SINPLE. Ran a Cobb on my 17’ raptor.... major PITA but made a huge difference on high speed WOT

  • @colecampbell1906
    @colecampbell1906 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Should really have it tuned first to see the true potential, should be getting over 400 with some solid turbos and intercooler

    • @Stickerslapper
      @Stickerslapper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That set up- with e30/e50 is good for over 500whp.
      It's ALL in the tuning .

    • @colecampbell1906
      @colecampbell1906 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Stickerslapper yea potentially, I'm just saying there's no reason it should be under 400, even if it's not the best tune.

    • @Stickerslapper
      @Stickerslapper 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@colecampbell1906 you are correct it should be well over 400whp
      Those numbers seem way off.
      I have a heavily modified 2012 f150 that I just finished installing new motor + big turbos. Allready had a ton of other supporting mods from the previous motor/ turbo combo. I'm Currently in the tuning process, logging /reflashing, rinse repeat. I pointed out that it's all in the tuning from experience of going through the tuning process on the 3.5tt motors Many times over the last few yrs. A bone stock 2nd gen with an e50 tune ONLY can see close to 550whp and over 600wtq.
      My set with a laundry list of mods can do about the same. 2nd gens are highly tunable and can see massive power with the right tuner.

  • @PoEncimaTV
    @PoEncimaTV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Tune on these truck is key, I went from 360whp to 511whp on E50 and tune only!

    • @Smallvet
      @Smallvet 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      What tune did you use?

    • @PoEncimaTV
      @PoEncimaTV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@Smallvet 5 star tuning 🔥

    • @Smallvet
      @Smallvet 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@PoEncimaTV any specific one? Or recommend. I have a spd turbo adapters spd catted downpipe and just ordered CR performance exhaust manifolds

    • @PoEncimaTV
      @PoEncimaTV 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@Smallvet I run E50 tune and you most do the revisions I noticed huge improvement after 4th revision. Hopefully soon Ill be upgrading to full E85

    • @Smallvet
      @Smallvet 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@PoEncimaTV nice man thanks a lot

  • @mikeperez6080
    @mikeperez6080 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Damn he made that look easy! I have wanted to do a inter-cooler upgrade for a while now! I have even considered removing my licence plate so the cooler could breath a little easier!

    • @Bsims50
      @Bsims50 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It is crazy simple and easy! Took me only 20min by myself! I also removed my liscens plate and disconnected my baffles so it breathes better.

    • @slowfudgeballs9517
      @slowfudgeballs9517 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      If you plan on stressing the engine at all then that is a must do. It blocks a significant amount of cooling capacity.

    • @jeremydean6210
      @jeremydean6210 ปีที่แล้ว

      Absolutely worth it

  • @hairpinperformance3926
    @hairpinperformance3926 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Missed opportunity to delete the intercooler shutters. other than that great job!

    • @joegrimes8293
      @joegrimes8293 ปีที่แล้ว

      Would it be beneficial to remove the shutters on a stock 3.5 eco

  • @Captain-Awesome
    @Captain-Awesome 2 ปีที่แล้ว +15

    I am really surprised that it didn’t have bigger power gains. A mild tune will add 100hp, this was way way more than just a tune. Maybe I am missing something I know LMR is a great shop.

    • @Kevin_Knox
      @Kevin_Knox 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Could be the type of dyno they're using, could be the gear they're doing the pulls in, pulls in different gears will drastically change torque figures on paper. Who knows this might be on 87 octane. One bug no no I noticed, was they didn't have any fans on the front of the truck, that seems a bit reckless to me. I would at the very least be concerned about cooling.

    • @keepnitsharp
      @keepnitsharp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      He says at 10:50 he did the pull in 4th gear.

    • @Captain-Awesome
      @Captain-Awesome 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@keepnitsharp Gotcha! Thank you!

    • @randyschmidt19
      @randyschmidt19 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@keepnitsharp also clearly shows ME for 5th gear on the last in pulls

    • @robsp32
      @robsp32 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      They are the same size as the factory turbos, but with different internals. Usually when you do this internal upgrade on the CHRA you are just changing the style of the wheels, not the size. Even on the best of turbos that is only good for about a 10% improvement over the stock turbo design. So this actually isnt bad for just that swap and an intercooler upgrade, but its ALOT of work for such a small gain. This IMO would be only something you do after youve blown the factory turbos and exhausted all your other mods.

  • @theashs4137
    @theashs4137 ปีที่แล้ว

    i have F-150 Ecoboost i always thought that i cant upgrade my turbos, is there way to know what i can upgrade on my truck ?

  • @brandonmiller5469
    @brandonmiller5469 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anybody know What exhaust set up is on this truck, im not a fan of the ecoboost sound, but this one sounded pretty decent

  • @843cuh9
    @843cuh9 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What stage turbos ? Thinking about getting stage 3

  • @pasolesoup7430
    @pasolesoup7430 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do turbos get blown out if people don’t put bovs on their f150’s? Also why isn’t there much aftermarket turbo systems for 2018 f150’s?

    • @xxdemonshitxx
      @xxdemonshitxx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      A little late here but I'll try to answer these questions. If the newer F150's were MAF-based, then you'd want to stick with the recirculating system that comes stock. But since it's a MAP-only truck, you can go with either recirc or VTA and you won't lose power or air efficiency. The only way to blow out the turbos is by not having either system in place causing the built up air pressure to flow back to the turbo inlets which it then would make a noticeable fluttering noise. Some people do this on purpose "because it sounds cool", but once you understand the damage it causes to the blades it'll just make you cringe. As far as the aftermarket turbos go, I believe it mostly has to do with the electronic wastegates on the Gen2 3.5 turbos. CRPerformance was the first to come up with a solution, as you may know, which involved machining stock turbos so they could add bigger compressor wheels...otherwise the turbos would have to be redesigned from the ground up and last I checked 6 months ago, only one company (Garrett) took the risk and did just that.

  • @xforce687
    @xforce687 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The tailgate said limited. I thought the limited only came with the Ecoboost HO, the same in the raptor?

    • @Viages
      @Viages 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      2017-2018 came with the same 3.5L 365 HP , 19-20 have the HO

    • @RadDadisRad
      @RadDadisRad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Only 19 and newer has the HO

    • @RadDadisRad
      @RadDadisRad 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      This truck has the 3.5HO

    • @xforce687
      @xforce687 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Viages Gotcha! I didn't see the year posted in the description. 😐

  • @traekiser213
    @traekiser213 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    It’s a shame to have those turbos off and not upgrade the manifolds lol

    • @xxdemonshitxx
      @xxdemonshitxx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah I thought the same thing when buying the Garretts. I ran into a fitment issue, though, because CRP released their manifolds before the Garretts came out and weren't shaped to accommodate the beefier compressor housing. I had to grind some material off the manifolds to get the turbos to fit. I was worried about the manifolds cracking during the constant heat cycling, but fortunately after 6 months so far so good.

  • @matthewrandall915
    @matthewrandall915 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    I couldn’t find anything other than ported upgraded turbos for my 14 sho. Hard to come by mods

    • @kruek24
      @kruek24 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      GEARHEAD makes a big intercooler for it, I got one for my SHO and Flex but they are on back order now. Maybe just keep and eye out for when they are in stock.

  • @elplevonrooo395
    @elplevonrooo395 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Can you do that to an expedition and get the same power gains?

    • @PettyKing713
      @PettyKing713 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It’s the exact same motor, only issue would just be the weight on the power loss through the driveline. But even then, you could still make it just as wild.

    • @ferasalbinmohamed1029
      @ferasalbinmohamed1029 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      How many HPs will get you

    • @Chamacurmom
      @Chamacurmom 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Five star did a 2019 expedition with downpipes, intercooler and intake and after tune made 650hp crank they said $3k in mods and were running 4.5src 0-60 and beat a mustang gt in 1/4 mile. They have a video on their page.

  • @youravc12351
    @youravc12351 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I don’t pretend to know or understand the variables involved with all the different Dyno’s but I’m with several people that have commented on here. I’ve seen several times personally between my own or several friends over the years including 2020 3.5 and have seen bone stock rear wheel numbers consistently north of 310 WHP.
    After watching this video and reading the numbers and the comments I googled and TH-camd ‘stock 3.5 dyno test’ and the 3-4 I watched were all over 315 - 333 WHP.
    So I am also confused with what reality actually is and why these numbers vary so much.
    Im about to get my 2021 3.5 dyno so I have a base line before I start adding stuff. Im told to expect around 340 ish

    • @garydryden9574
      @garydryden9574 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I think ford just does that to mess with us numbers vary I had a 07 freestar that we got brand new and they said it only had 256hp to the wheels and I thought the hp numbers were suspicious because I did a 0-60 5.6sec and was like huh so had my buddie throw in on his dyno and thing made 301hp

  • @drewdalesandro672
    @drewdalesandro672 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    With Aldo there you can get the Ford market to follow! He is a great Ford Guy! And has the race credit to follow!

  • @chopper8511
    @chopper8511 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do the 3.5 have the same turbo size as the 2.7 ecos???

    • @843cuh9
      @843cuh9 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No

  • @Aventuras_en_Moto_Hn
    @Aventuras_en_Moto_Hn 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    11:30 turbo gauge its crazy up to 20 and down to 0?????

  • @lazydud048
    @lazydud048 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What turbos are these?

  • @Logan0o
    @Logan0o ปีที่แล้ว

    how much reliable power can those stock internals hold on the 3.5s?

    • @michealgray533
      @michealgray533 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      from what ive seen 700-750 is where the 3.5 starts getting dicey

  • @medic2834
    @medic2834 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I didn't see any cooling fan being used on that truck while on the dyno? Whats the sense of testing a intercooler upgrade with no fan support?? Running that engine hard like that with no external cooling, glad it wasn't my truck.

  • @clintonlewis8760
    @clintonlewis8760 3 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    All that and your using cheap worm drive clamps? Those things will blow off. Use some t- bolt clamps.

    • @sdqdfyl
      @sdqdfyl 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Check out breeze clamps. Used on modified turbo cars. People run 30psi. Never had any issue.

    • @_willalexander.88
      @_willalexander.88 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      First thing I did is swap all the clamps to t- bolt on my FBO ecoboost. It was an upgrade on its own. Highly recommend to get the proper torque.

    • @stephenpourciau8155
      @stephenpourciau8155 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      OEM clamps are worm drive. Even running 22 to 23 lbs of boost on my truck they have never ever blown off.

    • @juan_f150
      @juan_f150 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@_willalexander.88 did you notice a difference ?

  • @macanthony206
    @macanthony206 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    my 14 is putting down 365hp with 420 torque, are you sure you are working on a 3.5? seems more like a 2.7

    • @rjsanders1981
      @rjsanders1981 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      It's a Limited model, they only came in a 3.5l.

  • @michaelphillips9870
    @michaelphillips9870 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    If that was my truck and I only made 68hp more from a tune, turbos, and an IC I would be pissed! Numbers seem pretty weak

    • @petemolnar6073
      @petemolnar6073 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Should be minimum 200hp wit all those mods. Just the Tune with ic upgrade should easily be 80-100hp.

  • @willfelix4655
    @willfelix4655 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ppl say my 14 ecoboost has 51mm turbos stock is that true?

  • @PhillyDee215
    @PhillyDee215 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice 👌

  • @Nextup24
    @Nextup24 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    My 2019 2.7 eco makes 325hp and a little over 400lb stock.

    • @bherron34
      @bherron34 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Would an upgraded intercooler make my 2019 F150 2.7 a little quicker in a quarter mile run due to air intake temperatures not increasing? Thanks

  • @mikewilt5779
    @mikewilt5779 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I want all the turbos on my EcoBoost

  • @nickolasviel3577
    @nickolasviel3577 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you fully disable the traction control to dyno it? Even after holding for 5 seconds and it saying advance trac off, my traction control still kicks in.

    • @matthewroper7214
      @matthewroper7214 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Most cars typically have a fuse to pull, each car is different obviously but typically it’s like a stabilitrak fuse.

    • @oceanwaves83
      @oceanwaves83 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ABS fuse?

    • @jchigginbottom
      @jchigginbottom 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I turned mine off with Forscan on my laptop. Forscan does a lot of good stuff. Need to check it out. You can get a free two month trail and get and extended two month trail after that. Turned off my traction control and Tire pressure monitor system because it kept acting up.

  • @sock979
    @sock979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I don't have the three five EcoBoost so I don't know but those power numbers before and after seem really low because I thought from the factory the crank rating was 365 horsepower 400 torque and so that's a really low or I guess high percentage drop of power through the drivetrain I saw vids of stock 3.5 ecobooats making over 300 to the wheels and I know that altitude temperature and things can end the dyno can affect how much it reads but that still seems really low I had a 2011 mustang v6 3.7 l naturally aspirated stock and it made 260 horsepower and 240 foot pounds of torque and it was rated 305 horsepower and 280 torque from the factory and after I made my own vortex supercharger kit I was pushing over 400 horsepower the rear wheels off I think 10 PSI if I remember right so those numbers just seem crazy low

  • @thebionichandman8967
    @thebionichandman8967 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    where in texas yall at?

  • @sakshamtiwari8611
    @sakshamtiwari8611 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    what about streetspeed 717 corvette c6 zr1 have u delivered it

  • @kevinwiltshire2217
    @kevinwiltshire2217 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Someone needs to make an intake manifold for these eco boost the stock one looks horrible

    • @tokeypokey
      @tokeypokey 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Need one with a holley top hat

    • @sock979
      @sock979 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No they need one that actually has some decent runner length and then they could have both port and direct fuel injection like on the Ford GT 3.5 v6 and put some goddamn bigger turbos on those things I know that on my EcoBoost it like stops making power after 5,000 RPMs it it needs a bigger exhaust on those turbos at least

  • @stout7668
    @stout7668 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Why do those numbers seem terribly low. I have seen stock ones at 340 rwhp and nothing done 🤔

    • @bradenjones2825
      @bradenjones2825 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I bet it’s the 2.7! I was wondering that as well

    • @angelorg1001
      @angelorg1001 ปีที่แล้ว

      In the video description it says it is 3.5

    • @tagle2818
      @tagle2818 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

      Prob. Different type of dyno

  • @nathanielpatrick610
    @nathanielpatrick610 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What exhaust are you running?

  • @pmrichets
    @pmrichets 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I thought these were 2.7 L numbers until I saw it was a Limited.

    • @paulli1874
      @paulli1874 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Makes no sense at all

    • @NiqqaJim
      @NiqqaJim 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      They even have the high output eco boost

    • @charlesshackify
      @charlesshackify 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Think they piece together the truck...they even had roush on the side never seen solid black interior for a limited

  • @saturdaysnowz
    @saturdaysnowz 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice rice tuner truck

  • @lawrenceyoung9669
    @lawrenceyoung9669 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have 2021 3.5 and its 400hp stock something wrong here

  • @fread51
    @fread51 ปีที่แล้ว

    Damn I didn't know aldo use to work for you guys

  • @joseperez3788
    @joseperez3788 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What is Aldo welds doing at LMR???

    • @LateModelRacecraft
      @LateModelRacecraft  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Been working here full time for long a time now...👍

    • @motortrend07
      @motortrend07 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Same i thought he was at the other shop

  • @SHOOTSHOW00
    @SHOOTSHOW00 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Aldo Welds works at LMR?

    • @LateModelRacecraft
      @LateModelRacecraft  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes sir

    • @SHOOTSHOW00
      @SHOOTSHOW00 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@LateModelRacecraft You guys doing coyote turbo kits now? I heard Aldo might know his way around a coyote.

  • @mrgcav
    @mrgcav 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about a list of parts you used and links ? 11875 W Little York Rd Suite 805, Houston, TX 77041

  • @charliegillingham8961
    @charliegillingham8961 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have a 2020 2.7L f150. With mbrp exhaust and K&N intake, I hit 320 hp. I'm sure that 3.5L can handle loads more power

  • @JayRSwan
    @JayRSwan ปีที่แล้ว

    This has to be a 2.7?

  • @RealMrNails
    @RealMrNails 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good video, but can you post music credits? Thanks!

  • @Shyamiiii
    @Shyamiiii 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Doesnt it come stock with 325hp? 🤷🏽‍♂️ u bumped it up 3hp?

    • @bryandepiazzy8679
      @bryandepiazzy8679 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      325 is crank HP ford advertises. These numbers they ran are to the wheels.

    • @joshuamorris9050
      @joshuamorris9050 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Should get a hell of a lot more

  • @chrisholland2016
    @chrisholland2016 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    There's my Limited. ❤️

  • @thegonz7833
    @thegonz7833 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Should have ran it against employees 19+Silverado,before and after,thats the vis we want t see.

    • @ScabFarmer
      @ScabFarmer 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ecoboost would walk a 5.3

    • @thegonz7833
      @thegonz7833 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ScabFarmer I know but would like to see the gain of the mods

    • @samduran5180
      @samduran5180 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@ScabFarmer A twin turbo 5.3 would be the ticket though.

    • @02hreblue30
      @02hreblue30 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      still faster stock than even the 6.2. I have had both. Torque under the curve and weight make it faster

  • @jaysontyler4468
    @jaysontyler4468 ปีที่แล้ว

    How much would that cost me

  • @twoserve2449
    @twoserve2449 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Its very confusing!!, my 2017 lariat with the 3.5 puts out 375hp stock!! 🤔

    • @NiqqaJim
      @NiqqaJim 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yeah I’m confused

    • @bryandepiazzy8679
      @bryandepiazzy8679 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      375 to the crank. These are wheel HP numbers. They should have been doing pulls in 7th gear 1:1 ratio

    • @twoserve2449
      @twoserve2449 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@bryandepiazzy8679 , you have a good point! 👍

  • @stephenpourciau8155
    @stephenpourciau8155 3 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    Was this on 87 octane?
    Because these numbers are EXTREMELY unimpressive. STOCK should make around 300-320 whp on 93 octane.
    And i have yet to see a single 2018+ 3.5 ecoboost even on bone stock turbos to not make at least 420-450 whp.

    • @slvrlightning00
      @slvrlightning00 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I was a bit baffled myself. Is it really a 2.7l? I don't know what the hp difference is

    • @AustinK95
      @AustinK95 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yeah im confused my 2011 3.5 before sending it to livernois in Detriot was making roughly 310 whp at 100k miles. After intercooler upgrades, turbo internal upgrades and better hot and cold side with catless exhaust plus some better plugs wires and injectors on 93 tune was making roughly 450 whp with 510 torq( and can go more now that I've got there meth set up). I will say ive never seen a stock 3.5 no matter what year make 450 whp, only raptors and GTs have i seen with those numbers from Ford with no mods

    • @stephenpourciau8155
      @stephenpourciau8155 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@AustinK95 gen2 17+ 3.5's make it easy man. Very different turbos and better exhaust manifolds.

    • @mmholling87
      @mmholling87 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stephenpourciau8155 what's your opinion on upgrading the intercooler on a 19' 3.5 EB? I'm all stock and only run 93. The truck runs much better on cold days vs hot...I'm thinking the bigger intercooler might help with heat soak and lower egts.

    • @stephenpourciau8155
      @stephenpourciau8155 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mmholling87 should be your first mod.

  • @boxerdog5979
    @boxerdog5979 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Who is the band playing? Love it.

  • @jacklaughlin5782
    @jacklaughlin5782 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I dont understand this at all. I can tune my 2012 3.5l and make nearly 400whp on 93 octane. You must have something messed up bad. You have exhaust intake upgraded turbos upgraded intercooler. What motor is this?! Stock 2.7l makes like 325hp or something...

    • @mhmetts3
      @mhmetts3 ปีที่แล้ว

      My stock 2017 3.5 eco (2nd gen) laid down 300whp and 400wtq bone stock. They did something veryyyyyy wrong here lol

  • @foxxrider250r
    @foxxrider250r 3 ปีที่แล้ว +45

    Aren't there plenty of stock turbo 3.5s out there putting down mid 400s with over 500 torque? This is confusing

    • @AllendeNL
      @AllendeNL 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      It’s wasn’t tuned, they just did the upgrades

    • @foxxrider250r
      @foxxrider250r 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@AllendeNL oh okay I see. Hopefully some e85 and tune with spice things up

    • @Shawn-ne6ld
      @Shawn-ne6ld 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They showed wheel HP not crank HP. Crank is what the factory reports. Wheel you lose around 15% or more through the drivetrain.

    • @JaegerWrenching
      @JaegerWrenching 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yeah could have just tuned a stock turbo truck and made more than that. Maybe this is in preparation for someone else to tune it.

    • @foxxrider250r
      @foxxrider250r 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@JaegerWrenching I am guessing close to 500 wheel with a good e85. Would be a badass truck at that point

  • @fmangua
    @fmangua 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With a right tune for big turbo, intercooler. Reach easy the 410 whp

  • @brandenhall8051
    @brandenhall8051 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Maybe use a torque wrench for those critical parts bud!

  • @aaronkowalewski659
    @aaronkowalewski659 ปีที่แล้ว

    I thought that the 3.5l ecoboost would have more power than the base numbers showed. It's lost 200ftlb of torque and 100 hp? I'm not familiar with this platform so forgive me for not knowing these things with this platform

  • @sdqdfyl
    @sdqdfyl 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I thought stock makes 470 ftlb torque. Drivetrain lost 200 ftlb to the wheels???

    • @homerog4920
      @homerog4920 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      I know lol,something is wrong with their dyno or software only stupid dyno numbers ive seen for these trucks are these. They are very low even for 1st gens. I guess they dont know how to tune either...

    • @CajunRulez
      @CajunRulez 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@homerog4920 The 470 lb. feet of torque is the flywheel, or crank rating. He's posting the real world power to the rear wheel that you get on a dyno. The manufacturer never advertises those numbers b/c that wouldn't be as impressive. There's always about a 30% loss of power through the drive train, but with that said his rear wheel numbers here seem pretty low.

  • @paulli1874
    @paulli1874 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I think on the Dino run you should be in 7 gear and those numbers are really low . I watched stock 3.5 make those numbers. Makes no sense

    • @paulli1874
      @paulli1874 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      th-cam.com/video/uPMOlhkIg9c/w-d-xo.html
      This will tell you real numbers dynoed at wheels for all f150 engines

  • @arbiter1
    @arbiter1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    @10:10 a Sound i will never like, v6 sound in a pickup. Never sound like a v8 rumble.

    • @RadDadisRad
      @RadDadisRad 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      The ecoboost v6 is a particularly awful sounding v6. Lots of other v6 engines sound better.

    • @mattgmattg83
      @mattgmattg83 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No way i could own a full size truck that sounds like that

    • @ther.6107
      @ther.6107 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Yeah I hear you then you get passed by the V6.

    • @spencerchristie4000
      @spencerchristie4000 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@RadDadisRad resonator delete, corsa exhuast, sounds like a damn 7.3. People don't know how yo set these things up right. But go ahead, throw the $500 ebay exhaust on and complain about the noise.

    • @mattgmattg83
      @mattgmattg83 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@ther.6107 I didnt buy a truck to make it fast I bought truck to use as a truck

  • @RaddestDad
    @RaddestDad 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    370whp on a limited with turbo upgrades???? I mean my stock turbo SHO made those numbers with a tune.

  • @aaronkowalewski659
    @aaronkowalewski659 ปีที่แล้ว

    Geez, you can get a lot more power than that with just the 93 tune from MPT. And save the money spent on the turbos. Doesn't seem like itd be worthwhile to go this route at all

  • @yzth3ory630
    @yzth3ory630 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ummmm not talking shit but is there a post tune video? Because this was clearly an installation video only

  • @jeremyleis5415
    @jeremyleis5415 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dang guys, something is seriously wrong with that truck. Stock those engines normally dyno out just under or right at 300hp. MPT is making over 400hp at the wheels with only a tune. Get that thing figured out. Something is very wrong.

  • @bobdingle2539
    @bobdingle2539 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Please, for the love of God, tune your truck.

    • @spke532
      @spke532 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      ikr those numbers suck!!!!!

  • @adwenb
    @adwenb 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    My ‘17 Sport is rated at 345 hp but I believe that is end of crank hp not wheel hp. Auto 4 wheel drive and you loose a bunch of hp. Probably no more than 250 wheel, most likely less.

  • @arse0822
    @arse0822 ปีที่แล้ว

    They left it worse than it was

  • @jacobshort5378
    @jacobshort5378 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ohhhh I have the 2.0 escape. I need new turbo and intercooler!

  • @02hreblue30
    @02hreblue30 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    105HP driveline loss? Nearly 30%. Something is awry stock. Were you running Premium gas on the base dyno? Something just isn't right about stock HP.

    • @pascalolesen5187
      @pascalolesen5187 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      No that is what they put out in 90 degree days with no breeze into the cooler and he has cats that are holding that thing back and that shitty lazy stock tune

    • @stephenpourciau8155
      @stephenpourciau8155 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pascalolesen5187 No it isn't lol.

    • @pascalolesen5187
      @pascalolesen5187 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@stephenpourciau8155 I had one and it was very slow and over rated

    • @pascalolesen5187
      @pascalolesen5187 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Eco Puke

    • @stephenpourciau8155
      @stephenpourciau8155 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@pascalolesen5187 cool mine ran 11.2 @ 121 mph. Look at my channel

  • @leetrick6202
    @leetrick6202 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Tune only trucks are making more than that….

  • @Sergeantgrunt
    @Sergeantgrunt 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Y'all better show some respect! That's a Roush F150! Says so ALL over the truck. Putting an exhaust on a truck doesn't make it a real Roush product.

    • @Bsims50
      @Bsims50 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Isnt a roush just a package with roush products on it? Stage 1 roush is only an exhaust and CAI. This package they are installing is a stage 2 roush package for the EcoBoosts, so yes it is a roush.

  • @burgbuilt
    @burgbuilt 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Everything about this install looked like a head ache

  • @matthewpate154
    @matthewpate154 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    How do you upgrade a truck and lose power lmfao? They make 475 tq stock

    • @CajunRulez
      @CajunRulez 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      The 470 lb. feet of torque is the flywheel, or crank rating. He's posting the real world power to the rear wheel that you get on a dyno. The manufacturer never advertises those numbers b/c that wouldn't be as impressive. There's always about a 30% loss of power through the drive train, but with that said his rear wheel numbers here seem pretty low.

  • @jakecristo
    @jakecristo 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Bro my 2016 2.7 made 375hp whit just a cut exhaust 😂

  • @911g1
    @911g1 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You should keep mading ford half of the mark is ford good look and keep the good work 👍

  • @MikeF055
    @MikeF055 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Those aren't 3.5 numbers. This is a 2.7.

  • @superdutyfan
    @superdutyfan 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Seems really low for all the mods that were put on it.

  • @Upracefan
    @Upracefan 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Dyno pulls in that should be 7th gear. You can gain more power and torque with just a tuner. What a waste of time.

    • @chrishamilton4501
      @chrishamilton4501 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s what I’m saying! Something is way off I feel

    • @kevinskonieczny7708
      @kevinskonieczny7708 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Factory 2.7's are seeing 300-310 or more at the wheels. Yeah something is off. To my knowledge, 5th is the gear on these 10r80 trucks.

  • @omahasho4658
    @omahasho4658 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Yo guys go check out powernations video about the viper truck vs a f150 they killed it not in a good way the f150 with upgraded turbos, intercooler, and injectors only make 415 wheel 🤣 it’s embarrassing why cux I have a sho with stock turbos, stock intercooler with downpipe and fuel pump upgrade and make 420+

  • @scotthill1278
    @scotthill1278 ปีที่แล้ว

    All that money in mods, an a jiffy lube oil filter........wow.

  • @sleary123
    @sleary123 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Those #'s are way off...

  • @tomrados7512
    @tomrados7512 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Damn it, my phone said How much power do turbos make. Was going to throw my two cents regarding how fat is your wallet and it's a damn v6. Now I have to throw the two cents in another direction. Buick had the Grand National back in the 80s. Nothing new about a turbo v6. One thing that hasn't changed, they still sound like crap.

    • @alexdiaz2398
      @alexdiaz2398 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I don’t know man the Nissan GT-R sounds pretty good to me

  • @natloz17
    @natloz17 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Umm, so is this just the gain from the bolt ons without tuning?? Because if it's tuned, you need to go back to school...

  • @jragz_1759
    @jragz_1759 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The numbers dont make sense.

  • @mattbopp6006
    @mattbopp6006 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    This video makes no sense. You can get those gains with a tune on a 3.5. Also, turn the freaking speed limiter off and rev it out. I think thats half the problem. This tune is way off.

  • @The1sRos
    @The1sRos 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    those numbers dont even make sense

  • @forrestfuller6359
    @forrestfuller6359 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    It's got to be a 2.7 even the exhaust sounds like a 2.7 my 2016 limited sounds deeper than this and it's stock. My truck throws down way better numbers than that.

    • @DontBeSoft247
      @DontBeSoft247 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No it doesnt

    • @rjsanders1981
      @rjsanders1981 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That truck is a Limited model, they only came in a 3.5L. 2019+ Limited years have the same turbos and engine internals as the Raptor.

  • @mrgcav
    @mrgcav 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    A narration rather than annoying music would be MUCH more helpful.

  • @crakkajakka15
    @crakkajakka15 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    sounds like hot garbage...there I said it

    • @johnclark3067
      @johnclark3067 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Never could understand how they can sell so many of these. I don't care if it makes 1000 horsepower if it sounds like that! Embarrassing.

    • @oceanwaves83
      @oceanwaves83 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      True