Thoughts on the Tudor Black Bay 58
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 5 ส.ค. 2024
- #tudorblackbay58 #bluebay58
Great watch no doubt... but does it get over-hyped? Is it a submariner substitute? Is it the best diver to by at around $4,000? Do you have the frame to comfortably enjoy the watch? What is the future of the BB? I share my thoughts here. I'd love to hear yours!
*I filmed this a couple weeks before Watches & Wonders. There is now a GMT iteration in this case diameter called the Black Bay Pro.*
Thanks John for the assist in lending me your 58. Follow him on IG @watchsalis
My recommended Tudor AD-
Brent Miller Jewelers
717-712-8954 (Brad's cell)
brad@brentlmiller.com
Join my Patreon and Discord:
/ brucewilliams - บันเทิง
It was about time someone talked about the BB58.
🤣🤣🤣
Lol!
Been a long time coming.
😉
You win the comments section!
The BB58 is for those who love the look and feel of the 5513 Submariner or vintage Tudor Submariner. I love vintage dive watches, but want a modern watch I can wear everyday and in every situation. The BB58 seems to fit that criteria.
I’m a pretty big guy; 6’3, 260, 7 3/4” wrists. I find my bb 58 plenty satisfying. My other daily wear is a 42mm Speedy but the 3mm size difference is really noticeable. The proportions of this watch are perfect. Btw, I have the og with the guilt dial.
To me the BB58 is so much better looking than a sub. I just wish they made a date version.
The BB58 blue is my favourite watch in my collection faux rivets and all.
The 58 is hyped because there aren’t many luxury divers under 40mm. If your wrist is bigger, you have a TON of options at any price point. But if you have a wrist under 7 inches and want a really nice luxury diver, the 58 is really it. For under $4k for Rolex level quality, really great in house movement and wears much better than any modern Sub, the 58 really is the perfect choice. The 58 is not over hyped, it’s hyped to the perfect amount because of the fact there aren’t any other real options and the watch is under priced.
Clearly not everyone fully understand the true appeal. 58 offers. It is like you said. Perfect in size, respectful brand and make and movement. The no interesting dial. Comment from Bruce is very subjective
I have a 7.75 inch wrist and love how the BB 58 wears. I wear watches that range from 44mm to 35mm. Love them all.
Certina DS Action Diver 38mm is a great option, if the budget doesn't allow the BB. Not comparing them of course, but the Certina is pretty awesome and well under 1k. ISO rated to 300m,80h of Power Reserve, sapphire with AR coating, diver's extension, etc...from a brand with 100+ years of history and within the Swatch Group.
I love the BB58 and I totally get the appeal. It's a watch I definitely want to get in the near future. BUT the truth is that at over 3k one should expect a ceramic bezel and on the fly adjustments on the clasp. At least I do - even if it is a vintage inspired piece and a rare sub 40mm watch.
Don't like the aluminum bezel
@@bryanryan4504 it’s a design choice to feel more vintage. Everyone has their preferences.
A stellar watch and I 'm fortunate to own both the steel Black/Gilt and the Navy blue versions on the bracelet. They share wrist time with my immaculate Rolex Sub Date 16610 which I've cherished for 20 years now. The BB58s more closely resemble the elegance of this era of Submariners rather than the latest and larger ceramic Subs. Probably why I love them so much - but with the added benefit of a modern in-house COSC movement and 70-hr power reserve.
As I mentioned to you on Thursday, I've become a real Tudor fanboy. My BB925, is beautiful in its simplicity, as is the reference you reviewed here. The whole BB line gives everyone a choice, and at prices easier to swallow than some others. Of course, it's all relative - several thousand dollars is still VERY expensive!
Poor man's rolex still though
Still inferior to Rolex.
@@MrLoughneagh and Rolex is poor man’s PP or ALS
Tudor is where it’s at. Im a big fan
Big fan of my Gilt dial BlackBay 58. 70 hours of power reserve almost give it a quartz like « grab and go » capability when all watches in the box have died the previous day.
Only real improvement much needed on this version, is a feature you find now in sub $1k micro brands, is obviously the on-the-fly bracelet adjustment and it would be 95% perfect.
And I understand Tudor cannot step on its big brother’s toes, but a rose gold BlackBay 58 on solid rose gold bracelet would be a fantastic watch for the successful entrepreneur wanting something safe and different at the same time.
Seems like I'm in the minority here but I actually like the rivets. I mean, the idea of them is silly -- faking a manufacturing process for aesthetics, especially on a tool watch -- but I think the rivets look good and give the Tudors a distinctive style. I really wish we could have a quick adjust system though. I had to take my GMT off today because it got too tight and I'm on the the last micro-adjust hole.
Yeah I like the rivets as well. They're not obnoxious yet they make the bracelet more interesting than if they weren't there
The rivets don't bother me. I own the 41BB in black. You don't even notice them.
Like others have said, when you don’t like them (like me), you don’t notice them at all while wearing the watch
The rivets are embarrassing Tudor should make a real riveted bracelet if they love that look so much. Who wants something to look like something that it isn't and yes it isn't something your notice but just knowing they are fake would drive me nuts. It reminds me of something that would be on a cheap fashion watch or toy. A real deal diver should not have a useless decoration
BB58 Blue is the best looking, highest quality, and most comfortable wearing watch in history regardless of price point. Try it on a Vanguard rubber strap.
I and bunch others like gilt more
I love the BB, its design is more classic inspired than other modern divers, but most importantly it is less shiny/blingy
I have yet to own a Tudor, but I will at some point. Thank you for the video!
I own a new Sub date and a BB58. The Sub gets left in the box almost every time. The 58 just wears better. As far as quality, I really can’t say the Rolex feels far superior.
I wouldn’t mind taking that Sub off you.
I've had the same opinion. Now full disclosure, I do not own a Sub...but have handled many and I honestly do not see a 5-6 thousand dollar difference in quality.
I am a tudor guy bought a few now love them my girls have them to and they love them too try them and you will never look back
I love mine, like others have said, it’s the current day vintage sub
Love the bb58 , have it the original black and the more recent Silver, but, sold the blue for a Sinn R500 which gives me great pleasure.
Love mine. I rock it on a blue MN strap. Tough, simple, legible. The shade of blue is perfect. Given what I do for a living, my watches need to be able to withstand a lot of abuse. The BB58 absolutely aces it, and it looks great while doing the job.
Happy Easter 🐰God Bless 🙏
The top three watches in my collection are a Grand Seiko 44GS Spring Drive (SBGA373), Rolex Explorer, and Tudor BB58. The BB58 is the black version, on a supreme Bond NATO, and it is my most casual watch. The Explorer remains on the bracelet and the GS on leather, each a step up in formality.
Bruce - great review! Wear it on an Everest black strap and it's the type of watch that gets time out of the watch box daily. Thanks for the content.
I wanted a sub (no date) but got fed up of the game playing/waiting needed to get one. The sub would have likely been a “one and done” as I doubt they’d be many occasions I’d have taken it off, but I chose a med. JLC Reverso duoface instead which I absolutely love. The Reverso is great but leaves a space for a daily/beater type dive watch and I think the smaller size makes the bb58 the prime candidate for me - as it won’t make the Reverso feel tiny when I go back to it (which happened when I tried the mm300). It’s a watch that will only look better the more you wear it, some watches you wince every time you notice a scratch/ding but I think the bb58 will look great and will age well.
Diminutive because it's 1mm smaller than your hulk? LOL okay. I'm a big guy and love the 58 but I guess I also don't want a dinner plate on my wrist. And give me a break already with the rivets. One, they don't look that bad. Two, you don't even notice them. The only substitute for a submariner is a Pagani Design or some other homage watch. Tudor's black bay is it's own thing. At the end of the day, most dive watches will look similar anyway due to the functionality of the design.
Apart from the aesthetics of the rivets, I think it’s an over the top faux vintage attempt. It’s just a bit unnecessary, to me. But hey, I don’t like it, so I won’t buy it, doesn’t mean others can’t enjoy it! God bless ya.
Bruce, we need you to use your skills as the Tudor Whisperer to get them to standardize the T-Fit clasp across all models!
I bought my BB58 just before Christmas. It’s an overhyped watch so i let the hype die down before I could be objective. Hands down it’s one of the best bang for buck watches out there. Is it as good as the Sub? Hell no! Is it as good as a pre ceramic sub? Quite possibly! It sits nicely just below the SMP300 in the pecking order. Great watch for the price
i really like the blue hope to add one to the collection soon
I think you are making sense in regarding the size of the BB58, I got the BB 41mm and I feel it is the right size for me, I don’t think the 39mm would feel good on me. I know the BB58 it s very popular but as you said I don’t like to get things where all the people is looking at, some people like to turn to the places where not everyone is going so crazy before then it becomes boring.
I’ve personally had both the original black/gilt and the blue dial BB58s and while I did love both watches, I got the white dial/black bezel Omega Seamaster Professional and it’s just a better watch for the money in my opinion.
I loved the BB58s don’t get me wrong. I have a skinner wrist so the 39mm case was perfect for me, but both BBs I had the chapter rings were misaligned. I took it back to the AD for them to send to Tudor on the blue bezel and it was 8 weeks and they still hadn’t even looked at it yet so I just had my AD ask for it back and I just dealt with it.
My SMP has been absolutely perfect for me. It doesn’t wear too big and having the date and the on the fly micro adjustment were the most important features for me. I use a date complication too much to not have that and my wrist size fluctuates a lot during the day living here in Oklahoma so having the on the fly adjustment was a HUGE benefit.
I like the BB58's as a bracelet wear. What I like most is the dimensions and thickness. I have 19 cm wrists but I like a sleek tapered piece on a bracelet, one of the main reasons I don't like the SMP300 on a bracelet but love it on the rubber strap. The first 2 Black Bays never did it for me, something was "missing" or just a lil bit too plain. The Bronze though fixes a lot of this and this is the one i'm going for short of Tudor being able to make a 58 GMT with a 12mm thickness.
Is this a safe piece, Bruce? Just wondering lol awesome video sir this is one of my grails..
I think the size looks perfect on your wrist.
I agree with a lot of what you said. I have a BB58 in blue and its quite nice! It’s definitely not a sub replacement. But its nice in and of itself. I’m really not a fan of the bracelet (not cus of the rivets), but just because it does not fit my 16.5cm wrist well. I cant seem to get the adjustment right. Barring that, its great. It wears well, feels good on the wrist, is not at all in your face and I like it. I actually like the BB Pro as well (the thickness isnt actually that bad irl). But i dont think im going to get another Tudor anytime soon. So many more brands to wear and explore!
U can source half link from. Aftermarket
What I want is BB58 in titanium with 3-6-9 blue dial and red triangle pip on the bezel.
Guys, im looking to buy a tudor bb58 blue complete set, someone is offering me 2200 usd, is that a good deal??
I have an 8 inch wrist, whats agood watch forme?
I'll cry one last time that there isn't a 58 red with that gorgeous coffee and gilt dial and perfectly red in aluminum bezel. Leave the ceramic.. . That's the best looking diver in my mind. This is nice but the black serves the 58s design in intention better in my view. The bronze is tasty!
Was considering a bb58. I own a bb36. It’s a solid daily wearer. But the bb58 in the end, was kind of a substitute for a sub 14060, so I bite the boulet, and went and bought a 14060m. Don’t look back.
Hoping for the t fit bracelet on the 58. Then I'll consider buying
i allways thought the same ...it is to small but to be honest that BB58 looks perfect on your wrist!
looks nice
I just got one of these, and absolutely love it!
I got one about a week ago. Let me ask you, what's the accuracy been like for you? Mine gains 4 - 5 seconds a day when I wear it all day, but it's ±0 seconds per day if I leave it on the table all day
@@derekwalter4238 I’ve been wearing mine everyday and I’ve observed it to be running at -0.7s per day.
@thetrentmeister damn.. well, congrats, brother. I guess I just got a bad movement. Good thing it's got that 5 year warranty lol
@@derekwalter4238 I feel your discomfort. I imagine they can probably regulate it for you. Tudor may see the performance as okay though as it is running within COSC.
@@derekwalter4238 does it gain that time while on the wrist from when you put it on until you take it off? You could try setting it down at night in different positions. Perhaps positional variance might make up for it.
Tudor have really hit the nail on the head with the BB58 in just about every aspect. Amongst a number of other divers, I own a Seamaster 300M and a Submariner.....but I would most certainly enjoy and wear one of these. There really isn't anything I don't like about it. If I had this amount of money to spend on one diver, I'd have to say that this would likely be it. For a tad more however there is the Seiko MarineMaster 300 which, if you've not held one in the flesh, is pretty bad-ass, not mention an unusual/interesting choice. A tad heavy that said.
For bigger guys I really recommend a gevril wall street. You can pick one up for a mere 500 dollars. The fit n finish is similar to rolex and it is absolutely stunning. 43mm.
I slept on this watch for 2 years, 4 if you count the black BB58, purely because I was waiting for the hype to die down. No such luck and I'm picking one up at the end of the month. I actually prefer the BB58 to the Sub for looks and dimensions. I mean, if I could get a Sub at retail, I'd get it first, because, duh, profit. But all things being equal, I'd get the BB58 because I don't want an investment, I want a cool, old-school looking, modern wearing, dive watch. I love that there's no gold and no fauxtina. This is not a try-hard watch. It just does what it does elegantly and effortlessly (cept for those faux rivets).
My BB 41 no date ...is perfect!
Great video. I prefer the Pelagos.
Will come to date version?💙
Bought 1 last week. And stopped wearing all the rest! Hahaha. * the length of the clasp is long and inarticulatelinks, just in case if you have a narrow wrist.
I have both(BB 58 and Ceramic sub date). Gotta say, I enjoy the BB 58 better. Reminds me of my 16600 sea dweller.
I think they have a ceramic version available. However, just in black.
I would love a BB58 in blue but it looks almost comicaly small on my 8in wrists. I'm stuck with the Black Bay 41 unfortunately
And how do you like it so far? I have almost a year in debate with myself which one to choose - 58 or 41, and I have similar sized wrists as Bruce and I am also a bigger dude.. I even tried them both at the dealer, and while 41 looks more suited for my wrist, I am not sure about its height. Is that something you used to?
I agree BB58 works better for smaller wrists. I did a BB58 bronze vs BB58 black comparison on my channel if you are interested Bruce. Thanks!
Omega Seamaster white dial, black bezel and steel bracelet is a beautiful spec there. How does it compare to Rolex Sub quality?
You hit the nail on the head about size. I went into my AD thinking I wanted a 58 and with my 7.5 wrist it just looked too small. I walked out with the OG 41mm Black Bay and I couldn't be happier with it. I've had it for about a year and it is great. I've become a big fan of Tudor and what they are doing. Thinking about adding that 1926 some time in the future. Also, the rivets on the side...doesn't bother me in the least. Maybe because I'm an aircraft mechanic and I see rivets all day long. You don't even notice them.
The rivets are not a big deal, it’s just watch snobs who split the hair in more pieces
The 58 only looks good on the skinniest guys. The rivets are too much homage watch territory.
That’s why they make basically the same watch in a bigger size as well. Big and small size wrists can enjoy it.
The BB is definitely on my list. But in talking about sub $5,000 luxury watches, I think Ball are very underrated. I have a Fireman Enterprise and the quality is exceptional. It also, like the BB, can be classed as a EDC workhorse, being noted for it's anti-magnetism and shockproof. If you watch the second hand track around the dial, you'll note how smooth it sweeps. All this costs around $1,000
Good video, but the content is already a bit outdated while we already know that Tudor released Black Bay 58 Pro, a Black Bay 58 GMT. So that was their vision of the next BB58, not for example a ceramic one.
Bruce I agree with you about the rivited bracelet. I suppose that may be a reason to get the bronze or silver versions.
I’m not sure it’s sensible to compare them to subs, they are different watches appealing to different people. I’ve always liked the look of the black bay 58 but it’s never hit the sweet spot for me. They are all beautiful but the black/gilt dial is too showy, the blue is blue, the 925 has a great dial but I don’t want a watch that tarnishes, I love the 3,6,9 dial on the bronze but it’s made out off bronze. To be honest I’m not sure I could buy one as I like a daily watch to have a date.
Finally with the pro they hit on something I really like, so much so that I’m currently wearing mine. I don’t care that it’s a gmt, I love the dial and it’s got that all important date and I love the fact that it does not look like it’s trying to hard. I have a 7inch wrist and I think it’s a great size for me.
Love the faux rivets
I'm wearing my black BB58 on my 7.5" wrist as I type. I guess my wrist shape is rounder than yours, as it wears perfectly...
Mabe if you had a 6.5 inch wrist your opinion might be very different.
It’s actually 1954 Tudor Submarine the 1st one and not 1958. The 1954 Tudor Submariner had Rolex Crown, Case back stamped Rolex, Rolex Hour, Minute and Second Hands. Though it was not a Chronometer. It had the Tudor Rose Logo on the Dial and it was 100mm. The New Tudor BB58 with Black Dial & Gold Indices, Gold Hour, Minute and Second Hands, it actually looks like the 1954 Rolex/Tudor Submariner.. Look it up… But the 2018-2023 BB58 is built with modern materials and is more accurate than the old Rolex/Tudor Submariner and it’s CHRONOMETER CERTIFIED with a in-house movement compared to the old Rolex/Tudor Submariner that used a secondary movement. It was actually called Tudor Oyster Prince 7924. I like how Tudor separated itself from Rolex and did its own thing, I think that Tudor is well on it’s way than it’s Big Brother and have reached out to different audiences $$$. The New Rolex Subs have gotten a little bigger in size compared to the old Nostalgic Subs at 37mm. That’s why I think Tudor hit it right in the spot with the BB58 from 41mm, 39mm and now the BB54 right at 37mm. With its small size and using their in-house movement and 70 hour reserve, I think it’s amazing !! I think I prefer this STEAK (Tudor) because it’s Better than a PIZZA.. It’s not a Rolex and I wouldn’t want it to be.
I have a 6.5 inch wrist so my options are already limited lol
There is a ceramic one... And it's a Master Chronometer.
Really a great watch for the money . I will say that I'm more partial to my 79220N smiley face on bracelet. thinner than either the BB Heritage or the BB 58 . And a nicer , cleaner bracket without the rivets . I do have a BB GMT on bracelet so have the rivet braclet as well and in truth , I don't care about the rivets being there . The BB 58 is a nice peice to be sure b I t I like the Heritage better , as it looks better on my 7 3/4" wrist .
The only things with it are the rivets and I the square markers go so much better with the Snowflake hands
Heritage 41 is the way to go
I am in 100% agreement with those that say the BB58 is nearly identical to the pre-bling or pre-2008 Subs. Slightly different bezel teeth and that is about it. Actually, the BB has better Lume and clasp than those.
I bought a new 2006 Sea-Dweller and wore it for 6 years near daily. So I do have some experience in the Sub line-up of that era. The BB 58 is the no date Sub of pre-2008.
I just bought a blue 58. I almost chose something else because it was too identical to earlier Subs. I was down to a Grand Seiko GMT and a blue Aqua Terra. The 58 is just more me.
It is not a current sub, but is nearly identical in all aspects to a pre-2008. It is also running somewhere between perfect to an imperceptible 1/4 second per day. Apples and oranges to the Sub it is not.
I have just hit my 50’s and was fortunate to get my first new Rolex sports line watch when I was 17- I am a long time watch nerd and the BB 58 is a pre-bling Sub.
Forgot, clearly a different crown as well.
Well said
The sub is not very different quality wise. Have owned both.
That watch definitely doesn't look too small for you.
Black reflects the warmth and 1950's vibe better which was the original intention of this series. Submariner is over hyped. BB58 is value for money and will become even popular after 20 years because this watch is classic, has the right proportions with a solid movement.
Bruce we got the same wrist size but after trying on the BB58 my wife said it looked too small. Maybe I had it on with the nato strap instead of the metal one. Somehow the BB GMT I find fits much better
Just sold mine. You can for sure say it's a perfect 1-watch collection which is sort of like the spare tire in your car's trunk for the enthusiast who has 4-6 watches they really love.
I’d love a BB 50d8te. But honestly, Tudor’s are as thick as Omega’s if they have a date
But the Hair!!
All that said, the important takeaway is that steak (fillet) is better than pizza though
Lol
As I don't like the Submariner, I don't see any watch as being a "substitute". I think that is generally a bad way to look at watches, not just because Rolex does not need or deserve to be on a pedestal, but because one can never truly escape desire for what they really want. If for whatever reason, you've always wanted a sub, any related watch is only temporary relief to that itch.
With regards to the BB, I like it. But I won't buy one. It's like a....almost perfect car. It looks good, drives well, etc. But, it's a bit boring. I prefer the more unique elements of the Seamaster or Superocean. That being said, I love the 925.
IMO, doesn't look too small on you :D
Fantastic review, Bruce. You said a lot of things that frankly just needed to be said. Cool watch, would look fantastic at the pool, but it's boring. There's no doubt... it's attractive, well made, but straight up boring. Which is probably why they are selling on ebay for 2900 right now.
I picked one of these up a few months ago......I love the blue BUT now wish I got the black face but NOW i may sell it to buy the BB pro
I have a new blue one on a bracelet available
I really like the bb58 but I think the aquis 400 is a better offering.
The OG Gilt is a strap monster, as well as the 925.
That Bond strap looks like ass on the Blue58. The Blue is too limiting imo. I'm only into strap monsters. And even though I wear a lot of blue, it doesn't pair with everything. They do have a warmth in low light, but in bright light, it's just blue and white. The white is almost too white.
Has nothing to do with '1958', They should have called it a BB73 or whatever year that came out, and given it the square plops like the Pelagos.
I don't care how many variations of the 58 they release. There is only one that has any real association to the year and its namesake.
Blue58 are already flooding the markets as they don't have that timeless staying power and people are getting quickly bored with them. The OG Gilt58 will never age as it's already effectively 60 years old and has an established timeless desirable warmth.
Tudor is a pure tool watch. I like it a lot more Panerai watches. Panerai is so ugly to me. I know Tudor is owned by Rolex, but I like Tudor a lot more than Rolex. I don’t like Rolex sale tactics. I will not own or want to own a Rolex. It is overpriced and overhyped. The quality at par of watches half or even a quarter of its price.
This comment is more about how much you hate Rolex and nothing about BB58.. it’s hilarious!
@@omarion07 To be fair, he compare the Rolex sub with the Tudor black bay. It is a weird to say, but I’m a Tudor guy more than a Rolex guy. I’m actually eyeing the Pelagos.
Like the Black bay 58 isn't part of the hype because it is
I like it but it's a little small, but otherwise beautiful.
I had it around my wrist a couple of times. It truly underwhelmed me. No doubt a fantastic watch, but not something for me.
You're very right about this piece Bruce. I found it very very dull and boring to be honest. I can only really afford one luxury watch, so I'm saving for a Rolex Oyster Perpetual 36mm.. much more beautiful in my opinion. I tried on the Tudor.... it's too flat if that makes sense
Edit - it needs a micro adjust system too.. and the hands - not a fan of the snowflake.... for a diver, I'd rather have an Omega Seamaster 300 (if it was slim), or that Rolex I'm looking for
Im a fan of both bb58 and OP. Im not saying an OP is dull or boring but maybe the model that is the most plain and simple of all rolex models currently available? Imo it is quite boring actually but still simple and classic and thats What makes it beautiful. So I dont fully understand your point here to be honest.
@@tobejas94 I see what you mean. I guess the OP just appealed to me more. And the classic look is more neat than the Tudor. And also the indices are more intricate and reflect light beautifully, which gives it more of a shine... just personal opinion isn't it. Sometimes hard to explain why one watch speaks more to you than another
The Explorer 1 is my favorite watch I own it just wears so well and it's not thick at all. Your gonna love it. I can't get into Black bays at all. Only Tudor I like is the Pelagos either version
@@lonewolfemcquade8133 Explorer 1 is my grail!
@@lonewolfemcquade8133 same here. Its not a snobbish thing or anything like that. I'd love to live Tudor, as they're available and a great price...but I just can't get into them for some reason....I love Omega (I've had a first gen Aqua Terra and a Speedy but sold them), my G shock is great too... I did love the Explorer for years and was on a waiting list, but after managing to finally try one on (the two tone) and an OP 36.... the OP just worked better. Less sporty and there was just something I liked about it... both are great watches though and the Explorer is class 👏
I own this watch, it is nice however, it is blah. I think you have to really like vintage watches. I have the Breitling superocean heritage 42 in black ceramic, this is my preference of the 2 watches.
I have the white SOH II but with a white/silver dial and indeed it is a stunner! And I do not dislike the guilt BB58, I absolutely love it, but as you say, one should have some appeal for vintage to be happy with the BB58
i sold mine! for a op36 ‚ much nicer‘ my daily beater is omega smp300m diver❤️
Pizza is us for poor folk and steak isn't. So no sub and dow. Vote. Better luck next time. I mean
.. Pizza vs steak... Cmon!
The bezel is never alligned on the bb58. It would really annoy me, and it seems to be a problem on all of them unfortunately
Steak or pizza....how about steak ON pizza? Problem solved. :)
It's a nice watch, but absolutely over-hyped. Tudor has a poor price to QC issue ratio which is something often left unspoken by reviews and influencers alike.
I think BB58 is a great watch for starting out with a watch collection. While you are waiting for the Rolex it will please you in every possible way. I didn’t even bother purchasing a care plan for my BB58 because I want to use it until it is being destroyed. That’s sth you wouldn’t plan for a Rolex.
Sus
Phirst
When are u going to show us your watches
@@tangsou6373 I have, but I set my videos to private
@@damachine3 how do I get on tour private
Cool piece, too simple for me.
If bb58’s are boring, then that makes the submariner equally as boring. Not sure how one is more boring then the other when they’re literally from the same heritage 😂
I get bored with the design of the BB58. I have to remind myself occasionally of how good the quality is for the price to make up for the lack of visual excitement.