Amanda Knox | Teaser [HD] | Netflix
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 7 ก.ย. 2016
- Suspect her. Believe her. See the other side. Now Streaming on Netflix.
SUBSCRIBE: bit.ly/29kBByr
Twice convicted and twice acquitted by Italian courts of the brutal killing of her British roommate Meredith Kercher, Amanda Knox became the subject of global speculation as non-stop media attention fed the public's fascination through every twist and turn of the nearly decade-long case.
In a world that remains strongly divided on the legal findings, Amanda Knox goes beyond guilt or innocence to shed new light on the events and circumstances of the past nine years. Featuring unprecedented access to the key people involved and never-before-seen archival material, the film shifts between past to present, exploring the case from the inside out in exclusive interviews with Amanda Knox, her former co-defendant and ex-boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito, Italian prosecutor Giuliano Mignini and Daily Mail reporter Nick Pisa.
About Netflix:
Netflix is the world's leading internet entertainment service with 130 million memberships in over 190 countries enjoying TV series, documentaries and feature films across a wide variety of genres and languages. Members can watch as much as they want, anytime, anywhere, on any internet-connected screen. Members can play, pause and resume watching, all without adverts or commitments.
Connect with Netflix Online:
Visit Netflix WEBSITE: nflx.it/29BcWb5
Like Netflix on FACEBOOK: bit.ly/29mx00a
Follow Netflix on TWITTER: bit.ly/29lYvcs
Follow Netflix on INSTAGRAM: bit.ly/29slD8O
Follow Netflix on TUMBLR: bit.ly/29v2Z25
Amanda Knox | Teaser [HD] | Netflix
/ netflixuk - บันเทิง
![Casting JonBenet | Official Trailer [HD] | Netflix](/img/n.gif)
But why nobody care about meredith kercher?
Good point.
@GerMart No!! The Supreme Courts said she was there. Do not lie.
Who?
th-cam.com/video/4fjWlB75XQo/w-d-xo.html
@GerMart Again..you are wrong. The SC declared #amandaknox was at the murder scene...cos of evidence
I just finished watching this documentary and honestly I don't know what to believe. Because everyone story keeps changing. Oh and the reporter he's definitely an asshole doesn't lack no empathy just cares about his story getting out first. The media definitely played a terrible role in all of this. And for the victim I hope her family finds peace.
The victim's family is just as bad, ever notice anytime there is a murder the victims family want whoever the cops name to go to jail? Cops could have told the mother that the man on the moon did it and she would be asking NASA to go get him to stand trial.
I hate the media.
It's why I've decided to try and change it.
I agree with media, especially overseas. Also note that government of America play the "bad role" more than media. In any country, it's not unusual for government to defend their people. Unless the leader of country/president was like mine. President in my country is like peasants-soul so, not even dare to ask "please listen to us", let alone think to save any victims & guiltys of our people in overseas.
Mas que investigador mais delirante! Criou uma cena e torceu toda investigação pra concordar com sua alucinação.
I wish more people were interviewed including Rudy and maybe some common friends of the girls, to have a more complete picture of what happened.
Here are the witness statements themurderofmeredithkercher.com
Rudy the crazy lying killer?
crowbird213 No evidence he murdered Meredith. All evidence points to Knox & Sollecito as the 2 murderers.
Kate Sleuth Yeah that’s bullshit and you know it.
@@katesleuth1156 Actually its the complete opposite
What frustrates me in cases like this is that people focus too much on the personas of the defendants and their behaviours, instead of focusing on witness statements, and evidence. And when this happens, it's really hard to figure out the truth, due to invasion of the media and other biased sources. Without the truth, justice can't be served to Meredith and her family, the people who deserve it in this case.
The only evidence they had pointed to the black guy who was found guilty, this girl might be weird, but it was the media and a really primitive stupid cop who got her in this mess. From day ONE he said she was guilty because she wasn't crying about a girl she barely knew was dead.
"The people who deserve it" is a weird thing to say about a case where someone was wrongfully accused. It's awful that Meredith died, but Amanda spent years in prison for something she didn't do, and slandered by press. Lol you guys don't think she has some opinions on that?
@@hollytree3379 You can prove her innocence?
@@johnmonk66 Yep because they have the evidence that shows who is the killer. And it’s not Amanda. But I’m sure you have fun being a conspiracist 🥰
@@hollytree3379 You are the conspiracy nut thinking she was framed, give me the name of the killer if "THEY" have evidence of who the killer is
The only person that made me feel on edge during that documentary was that vulture journalist Nick Pisa
Mickybo92 I agree
Same
such a duesch
Was an idiot, not a jounalist as should be!
He's an awful and corrupt journalist. No regard for the poor Meredith. May she rest in peace.
Lmao, let's all talk about Amanda again, it's not like anyone actually died or anything...
She got insanely rich from all the media attention.Guilty or Not how she just whored the case to everyone and anyone is disgusting and am shocked they had some images of the victim your right the way she is neglected in the media and used for Knoxs media attention is sick.Does the family get anything out this bring brought up again
She had millions in lawyers fees to pay. How did she get "insanely rich"? you are just making thing up. She spent 4 years in prison for something she didnt do.
Her Parents paid the lawyers fees and a massive PR Campaign You think She does all these interviews and books for free?From all this she earned more than what you and I would make in a lifetime.So yeah she got Rich of it and whored it out to anyone who listain to her and has no respect for the victim.
Her parents are middle class not rich. Google Amanda Knox parents financial burden. They had to have fundrasiers. She is being accused of murder of course she is going to fight back in the media. As you or I would. How does she have not respect for the victim!?
Because she allows callous attacks on the victim and her family on her own creepy and disturbing blog, which she herself moderates, ergo approves of such comments. She also follows the worst of the attackers on twitter. She also proclaimed "Shit happens" when news of Meredith's murder became known. She's guilty and a convicted criminal and fooling nobody with half a brain.
Watching this you forget that Meredith Kutcher was brutally murdered. You don’t hear from her family or anything from their perspective nor do we even get a little understanding of Amandas and Merediths friendship roommate relationship. But what it does show is that no matter what truth is right in front of your face looking at you people will still believe whatever they want to believe regardless. It shows the fault in humanity
They had a great relationship and all evidence was on rudy
That’s true they don’t talk about there friendship or anything! But I believe it was Rudy and the media just wanted a story so they blamed Amanda too for money cause she was easy cause she was a American girl
they werent close
nothing can change the fact that she is dead. I am sorry for her, but I am more concerned about a living person who is trying so hard to prove her innocence
@@dodo-eu6oxevery guilty person will try their hardest to prove they are innocent like their life depends on it…because it does.
Half way through... My feeling is that the detective with the pipe that he thinks he is Sherlock Holmes is the one that messed the whole investigation. His arrogance is very dangerous and makes him build theories in his mind that blind him and distract from the facts. Also, when he talks about Meredith's morals vs Knox's morals ... he seems like he is completely out of touch with today's reality on how young people (especially from from UK/USA) think & live these days. He so reminds me of the other small town detective that found himself in the middle of an international case with so much media attention: the detective from the Madeleine McCann case. These people so arrogant on one hand, with mediocre skills & knowledge, with their own obsessions and on the other hand they cannot cope with the media pressure to solve a case...
Netflix PLEASE get big into making documentaries. Not particularly excited for this, will watch it, but soooooo excited to see y'all seriously entering the genre.
Took me awhile to watch Making a Murderer but now looking forward to season 2 as his saga continues....Really looking forward to this Knox one though since I've followed this case since the first wrongful conviction.
Some new articles went up about the 2 guys that made this and how it came to be, they also got Sollecitto, Mignini and some Italian journalist I've never heard of
.
Besides they've focused in a famous "adorable" killer and her process not the victim and that she was brutally murdered... So disgusting!
Pamela Hernández We don't know what they're going to say about the victim the show hasn't aired yet so why jump the gun? But let's be honest, this is probably going to be about the drama that happened to Knox and Sollecito, but I'm not gonna lie, they got Mignini and I can't wait to see what he has to say.
Sorry Karen but you are wrong again. We already know what this crap is all about:
For true crime, the Amanda Knox doc is very funny. Theatre cracked up multiple times at the sheer gall and ego on display.
twitter.com/sarrobert/status/776981101512450049
In college, our sociology professor had large manilla envelopes placed at every seat students sat at, the week before we were learning of serial killers and the impact in society, as we went to our seats, and faced the large envelope, the professor stated, "look at what a serial killer looks like", and told us to open the envelopes and remove its contents...each envelope held within it, a mirror. Does, anyone really think her choice of phrasing, "either I'm a psycopath in sheep's clothing, or. I. Am. You." was a good one, considering murderers don't look like monsters, they look like you or me.
"There are those who believe in my innocence. And there are those who believe in my guilt. There's no in between. And if I'm guilty... it means that I'm the ultimate figure to fear. Because I'm not the obvious one. But on the other hand, if I'm innocent, it means that everyone's vulnerable. And that's everyone's nightmare. Either I'm a psychopath in sheep's clothing, or I am you."
And I was trying to express, in that same narrative, statistically, murderers and serial killers look just like you and I and not what people perceive them to be.
She was definitely told to say that. I just think no innocent person would of their own volition make a statement like that. The statement highlights the possibility of guilt. Tho we know that possibility exists already,but you wanna speak more to your innocence not remind people that you just may be a cold hearted lying murderer.
I agree...100%
That was a good analogy, you can't tell someone's a killer by looking at them, sometimes with serial killers there are hints early on, Dahmer and I think Bundy tortured animals early on and a lot of killers that kill,women hate women even though they're sometimes in marriages that seem normal, that BTK killer and I think the Green River killer was married I think.
In my own opinion, she didn't do it. The detective in this case, complete narcissist who missed all the important clues and made it about her, trying to prove he's superiority. He messed it up. Wasn't even about Meredith.
No, the documentary left out so many things. Mistakes were definitely made (we don't get many murders in Italy tbh) but the documentary won't tell you everything. If you actually read about the details you'll see that they didn't simply put her in jail because of a "hunch".
absolutely.
@@annythekettle7031 LMAOOO thats LITERALLY why they did. Mignini wanted to look good in the public eye again and honed in on her to the point he repeatedly lied and broke many laws/rules.
they tried using the bra clasp as evidence once it became useless after they kicked it around the house for days hence DNA transfer, the kiIIr admitted they werent there untiI mignini offered a reduced sentence after they got the max so the kiIIr switched to bIaming knox, they told knox she couldnt have a lawyer and that they were interviewing her as a *witness*, they did it for about 4 days for hours and manipulstd her till they wore knox down into sayin what they wanted so shed be Ieft aIone, they didnt let knox contact her parents, they tried using her sexuaI past against her, mignini repeatedly switched stories on knox because each one he made up had no evidence, no polygraph used, etc. AIways th0se who d0nt know how thls stuff workz that wantz ta say sum
@@annythekettle7031 exactly
@@annythekettle7031 Anyone with any knowledge of the evidence knows that Knox had absolutely nothing to do with the murder.
I saw the documentary. The cop is scary. He came across as arrogant and his opinion is always right. His eyes are hard to describe but if they are the windows to his soul, I would never want to meet him.
Research as shown that even innocent people will confess if they are "interviewed" for hours by cops. Eventually a person can become so confused from sleep deprivation and hunger that they can even start to have false memories.
Whatever Knox's part, if any, in the murder, once the lead investigator decided she was guilty, it wouldn't have mattered who her alibi was. He thought she was a slut because she wasn't a virgin and so she had to be guilty even though at least two other people said she wasn't. After being "interviewed" for hours they all said they were confused. Getting head smacks and being told to remember over and over and being led to who was really involved is not how an "interview" is supposed to work.
Rudy, one of the one's convicted emailed a friend and told him he had been there when Meridith had been murdered. He said he was in the bathroom and heard her scream. Then he saw a man run out. Rudy went to her and saw her throat cut and got blood all over him. He wrote to his friend that Knox wasn't there. He said he was afraid he would be blamed and ran. After spending a long time being "interviewed" he also changed his story.
Sure they could have decided to come clean but at some point they all recanted and talked about the interview tactics. Knox's boyfriend at the time also said that the cops called Knox a slut and other things to him.
Of course the cops also put out that it was a sex game and Knox was a sexual deviant. Of course the media ate it up. One of the media who was interviewed, Nick didn't seem to care what was true or not, only that he was thrilled to have his name out there. He actually said it was like a sexual buzz.
With how the case was conducted, you cannot trust if the cops really found out what really happened or if they decided the "truth" and went from there.
True this is wrong and I hope Amanda gets justice for what they did to her! They interviewed her for hours! They shouldn’t done that it was wrong was all for media
the reporter they interviewed in this is the embodiment of what wrong with the media.
This video is totally one-sided story for Amanda Knox. becuase they didn't even try to ask the questions below.
1. why did she and her boyfriend turn off thier cellphone on that night? especially only on that day?
2. They said they were watching movie on boyfriend's laptop. but according to investigation, his laptop was never turned on that night.
3. why did amanda buy cleanning materials in such early morning on the day the girl was killed?
4. why was boyfriend's blooded bare footprint found on the bathroom rug?
I don't think the footprint was ever found. That's a lie media literally made out of nowhere.
I watched the recent interview of Rudy Guede and definitely you can find those answers.
You are asking those questions because you have read the file case?
@@PEPAFLACACERAMICS yes, because they had enough time to rethink the whole story!
Netflix once again biased, she is guilty 💯, just like Jerry and Kate McCann
I wonder how many innocents has this police instructor sent to prison. He doesn't care about facts, he just trusts his guts.
100% correct my friend, finally an intelligent comment on here. That cop is the most dangerous, he thinks he is smart because he read a Sherlock Holmes book.. He even has the balls to say 'a prophet is not recognized in his own country, but I am. He is a piece of shit.
you've heard of Amanda Knox, now get ready for Amanda rings the bell.
I'd watch it
But was she 'saved by the bell'?
informatist no, She was saved by a black guy... I'll stop now
Whoooooooooa!
Too much incriminating evidence is missing from this docu. It’s also very biased. It was produced by 2 ardent Knox supporters.
Kate Sleuth Do you know any other evidence? I am truly wondering
@@CarmenTomate th-cam.com/video/cBmRd-x9XyA/w-d-xo.html
here, they even said they found her bloody foot print on the toilet! How did it get there if she wasn't at the scene of the crime! And I remember watchin' the Italian news when this happened, she looks really guilty while trying so hard to not show her emotions in front of the camera while heading to the court! Another thing, when they showed her the knife, she blocked her ears with her hands, the detective said she was like trying to avoid hearing voices in her head.. a noise like her friend's screaming maybe?! Last thing, the victim was covered with a blanket after her death, only someone close the her would do such a thing to avoid seeing her dead!
Mathlouthi Nourhen True but they did mention all of that in the documentary. So I suppose those details are not the missing incriminating evidence
The French version is the most realistic
@Pin Apple She maliciously accused an innocent man, Lumumba jn the first hour.
Italians made it a competition between USA vs Italy. The detective was an unfit Sherlock Holmes wannabe with his wooden pipe. Dude thought he was in a movie lol
I really hope Meredith's poor family have given this their blessing.
Why should the Kercher family give their blessing? This has nothing to do with them, it has to do with the railroading of 2 innocent young people.
Knox and Sollecito are murderers and rapists who got away with it because of corruption and political pressure from Biongorno and the mafia.
I think there should be a documentary about and named Meredith Kercher, RIP 🙏.
And how is it possible that this journalist Nick Pisa in this documentary talks about his personal success at that time, when he wrote about the murder and how he made the front page.. and even compares the feeling of his success with s*x. Can this people really not emphasize a little bit more with Meredith Kercher and her family?
I live 7 houses away from the Kercher's house. I never spoke to any of them to get to know any of them, but Meredith and I would smile at e/o along the road very often, and we probably should've really gotten with e/o when they moved into my road, but didn't have the balls to actually talk to her and create this. Anyway, it's not looking too great for the family. Meredith's dad John Kercher died a few months ago after injuries caused by a supposed hit and run which is a little bonkers it happened. You can Google that. Also the mother Arline has now got Dementia, along with serious lung problems from smoking so much, she'll be dead soon as well I think. Meredith's sister Stephanie is going to be moving back into the house I heard from my friend, who spoke to her a couple weeks ago when she came into the shop he works at. Maybe I should try to talk to her If I see her, or maybe not. I mean what do you say?
one of the worst crime documentaries ever made...it's all about knox scolding the public for saying she is guilty and very little about what actually happened
Ok so it wasn't just me....this "documentary" was horrible. It just jumped around without explaining anything really. They went from the couple was watching a movie to they were playing a sex game, with no background or why that speculation was brought up. The boyfriend turned on her, but then they were fine and we didn't even get an explanation as to what happened. Full of holes and not enough detail given. Seems like a rushed job just to make a show. I'm sure there are Dateline episodes that give a better look into this story.
@@shiroodis @Persia there were actually yes..you can find them here on youtube and u will see hoe this joke documentary is something made by knox pr team actually
@@shiroodis What sex game? That is just bullshit the idiot cop came out with the day after the murder.
The documentary was about an innocent person being railroaded by a stupid cop and the sick media, it wasn't about the victim.
I haven't watched the docu, but watching the trailer it seems like it's all about Amanda feeling sorry for herself. Which is all that a narcissist ever can feel sorry for.
I'm British so i'm probably biased because of the coverage of this case in my country. I don't know if she did murder or was implicit with it, but the fact the her story kept changing leads me to believe that something happenend which she didn't want people to know about. The problem with programs like this is it sensationalises her story, and causes a polarisation of people who think she's Guilty or Innocent. From what I remember of the case is that evidence was mis-handled and a number of testimonies changed, leading to an even more convoluted case. At the end of the day she served four years before being acquitted by the Italian Supreme court.
One of the problems with this case was the laws the Prosecutions side broke to secure a conviction. They were legally mandated to record the interrogations yet didn't record any interrogation or interview in a murder case. Her accusation of Lumumba came about during the last interrogation and we can't be sure why it came about without listening to the interrogation but it was also against Italian law to use information garnered during unrecoded interrogations against her but yet they did. Also we know that during the Hellman appeal, the forensic specialists, Stefanoni got caught in a lie regarding her testing of bloody footprints, we also know when Knox asked about an attorney she was told it would be against her best interests, that was a violation of her civil rights, another violation was to give her a hostile interpreter that sided with the police instead on a neutral one. The police also managed to fry 3 computer hard drives in their possession which makes me wonder what THEY were trying to hide, the court also refused the defenses request to send these fried hard drives to the manufacturers to see if the information on them could be retrieved so this was not a fair/impartial trial, not by a long shot.
Police are not required to record interviews with witnesses or persons
of interests. They have to with suspects though. And they did that with paper and pencils. Recordings do NOT have to be tape recordings. Police asked Knox if she wanted an attorney, Knox refused and very naively went on to incriminate herself. Curatolo was a solid witness who helped to convict Knox and Sollecito in the initial trial. His testimony in the Hellman was voided along with the entire Hellman court proceedings. Dr. Stafanoni was never charged with perjury. Dr. Mignini never leaked any information to the press that was done by the defense team Dalla Vedova and Ghirga. It was Conti and Vechotti who lied and the police recovered the computer hard drives that Sollecito had previously destroyed. This case was run by the book except for the final illegal acquittal. Extradition would have been a slam dunk and done in six months or less with Sollecito in prison.
Yes or no - was Rudy Guede's trial "not a fair/impartial trial"? His trial was part of the case. Please answer with a simple "yes" or
"no" or STFU.
Who knows if she did it or not. What we should be focusing on is how incompetent the Italian police was throughout the whole investigation. They did Meredith's family a disservice in my opinion.
Gav McDonald The prosecution and the police in Italy is way worse than the police over in the United States. I mean any officer that engages in intimidation and forced confessions is very much. And majority of the evidence is found on items. I can find my finger prints and evidence on a kitchen knife and some burglar can use that same knife kill my roommate. It doesn’t mean I’m the killer it means I used that knife the same day my roommate was murdered. And then you have the prosecution being so certain with assumptions that they missed the compelling person. A person convicted of assault, several priors is more likely to be the killer.
@@connorearl4263 possibly due to the lack of crimes and murders in that city
his last crime was 20 years ago
the cops forgot how to investigate a murder
Okay, so I'm watching this documentary right now about 30 mins (to give some context). I just have to say, the detective guy who is going through his line of thinking that first couple of days after the murder...he has outrageously horrible investigative intuition and practically has tunnel vision almost immediately when he arrived. Like, his assumptions and "intuition" is just so....bad. For example, states "only women cover up the body", what?! Then when Amanda is having a breakdown about what had happened to her roommate and the fact it very well could have been her killed, he says she is obviously freaking out because "SHE IS HEARING THE SCREAM OF THE VICTIM IN HER HEAD" (paraphrase). WTF!? He should be embarrassed stating that so confidently. So frustrating, and I know it gets worse from there. I think he takes his admiration of Sherlock Holmes way too literally, GOLLY GEE WILIKERS!!!
He wants to be like sherlok, but sorry to say. His IQ is not enough
I HATED that guy... the way he so confidently and stupidly blamed Amanda and then was so smug about it on the documentary.
Amanda’s making lots of money out of this ,sick
She's as innocent as OJ.
David Archer a lack of evidence does not innocence prove.
David Archer "It's the prosecution's job to prove guilt". You mean like how they found OJ not guilty? At best, she's an accomplice to murder and lied to the courts about her involvement, at worst she actively took part in the killing. Which I believe she did. Her constant contradictions make a compelling case against her.
please everyone for what it's worth the dead girls family are disgusted that she is just walking free
David Archer Because no one ever lies to the police.
Proof?
"This courthouse, in 1308, housed the first faculty of law in Europe. In America in 1308, they were drawing buffaloes in caves."...fuckin savage :)))))
At least the US courts know what they’re doing lol (mostly)
But unfortunately completely irrelevant in regard to the science of DNA analysis in crime scene investigation.
Retired Italian lawmakers and police have Admitted into Reuters interview Amanda Knox was treated dramatically unfairly during her murder trial and have called for a probe of the prosecutor's office in Perugia. All the people involved believes from the beginning she had nothing to do with any assault or eventual killing of Meredith. Believing much of the evidence to be a fabrication at best But were forced by prosecutors to push on
Led by Rocco Girlanda, a group of MPs has sent a letter and petition to the Italian president casting doubt on the prosecution's case in the U.S. student's conviction.
They allege than an appeals trial currently under way in Perugia has undermined the reliability of evidence originally collected against Knox - from Seattle, Washington.
Unlike Steven Avery and Brendan Dassey... she's guilty.
Like Casey Anthony
Dassey no. Avery? Absolutely, are you kidding? He didn't kill her in the shed, prosecution cheated and lied, but he did kill her.
Harry Flashman nunununo. Remember the part where the original commenter said "she's guilty"? Yeah, that part. In that way she is similar to CA. There's no substantial evidence proving Avery killed halbach. He would have had his DNA ALL OVER her car, including hair samples, and all over her key, and he wouldn't have moved her bones to the fire pit. The guy (ex bf or bro I can't remember now) wouldn't have deleted her voice mail making that shady as fuck and he wouldn't have given the only camera to the one lady who found Teresa's car within minutes of the search. He knows something. Once again, there's no evidence.
I can't believe how arrogant the journalist is. Also, it was funny when he said he always wanted to be journalist, since he was young, but then he writes his laptop with two fingers... On the other hand, I feel sorry for Meredith Kercher and her family. Rest in peace, Meredith.
they should have named this documentary "M E R E D I T H K E R C H E R"
Although she died this documentary is not predominantly about her - more than one life was ruined through this case. Amanda Knox is a victim of the Italian justice system.
@@EllieDaisy she wasn't a victim.
@@delmanpronto9374 She was in the eyes of the court and I’m my opinion too. She had years of her life taken away when she was falsely imprisoned for a crime she did not commit. Awful blood/DNA scene contamination, a smear campaign for the media and a corrupt police leader some of the many things wrong with this investigation.
@@EllieDaisy should have had more years taken away. only victims suffer. she wasn't one.
@@delmanpronto9374 I will have to disagree in the eyes of the law and from evidence, she is not guilty. I believe you are taking a very shallow look at the case and the way you determine a victim. There’s a reason Amanda was given compensation - she is a victim too. Hopefully you are never convicted of a crime you did not commit - however it might help you to see another POV and realise a crime touches more people than the one dead etc.
I usually think everyone is guilty but I really don't think she did it. If you imagine someone who she barely even knew got murdered yeah shes going to feel weird but she likely wouldn't be grieving. Think about that when you judge her 'strange' behavior.
not maybe grieving BUT shocked? like a lot of IFs...what if i was at home amd thia will happened? what if this and that...
i would never after the murder talk to my friend about my handsome italian bf when roommate was brutally killed...
Even if she didn't stick the knife in, she knows what went down, but is keeping her mouth shut. Why blame someone else for the crime like she did? I don't believe her. Everything she says is forced and unnatural.
Are you aware the police were legally mandated to record the interrogations yet didn't? Don't you even question why? Did you read the testimony at the original trial of Rita Ficcaro? Do you even know who she is? Probably not, I can tell you're pretty clueless about this case.
***** Even Mignini now admits there was no evidence against Knox and Ficcaro is never going to admit what she did during that illegally unrecodrded interrogation, we know she's a liar if only because she tried to pass off that interrogation as a "witness statement" but Mignini has admitted Knox was a suspect from the 2nd day and Giobbi is on video calling it an interrogation.
***** Again, he's the prosecutor, IF there were evidence against her he would have had no problem stating what it was.
+Quintus Beckmesser Lies are not evidence, where are the recordings of these so called lies?
There are no recorded interrogations even though the cops were mandated by law to record them, if you were actually smart you would question why they broke so many laws to convict these young people and why the case eventually fell apart.
If you put all the puzzle pieces together amanda and raffaele were innocent and this police magistrate was the most illogical, totally irresponsible police officer I have ever heard. Not one word out of his mouth based on facts, everything speculation. It's insane.
insanity
she is working on a book titled " if i did it
atown Ish my same thoughts
Haha, I see what you did there.
Justice for meredith
she did it.period
guilty as Fuck unlike Avery
you should read how angry the dead girls family is with her . heartbreaking story all round agree with alot of what you say tbh
yeah their statements read after both trials are just harrowing
Go read the court documents and ALL the evidence. moron.
all I said was the dead girls families opinion I didn't go even in to her inconsistencies in her story
i really think since then that she didn't kill the girl. It's not even in her behavioral pattern and the evidence. I think people just wanted her to be the killer along with her boyfriend because of the drama. You all read too much James Patterson and Dan Brown.
HeadstrongHarpy Knox lied from the morning of the discovery of Meredith’s body, to the police, throughout the trial, on national tv...She has never stopped lying. What innocent person does this?
I watched it . Seems like a happy interview . I felt the victim
Meredith , was not giving a proper attention . This is a stupid documentary . Everyone’s laughing, not even serious . Seems like they loved the spot light
Names of docu has to be Meredith
She does a lot of crying, about herself. She is about convincing as artificial flowers.
And what do you want her to do? Be all smiley and dandy over her being attacked by the whole world in a foreign country, and then thrown to jail on false accounts? I want to see how you would've faced it
She’s a narcissistic personality disorder she speaks only about herself
Esther Meredith’s girlfriends, boyfriend & her roommates all testified that Amanda always wanted to be the centre of attention. She was jealous that Meredith was popular, accomplished, funny & well respected by men.
@@katesleuth1156 well.that makes her guilty, no evidence needed
@@katesleuth1156 And how is that evidence she's a murderer?
I saw your documentary on Netflix and I couldn’t just stop crying, your innocent beautiful baby smiles almost put you in prison for life... I am happy you and you ex are good friends too
This is what happened you had several cultures being entangled. You had this girl from America, a detective that seem to jump to conclusions and assumptions with evidence pointing to individuals. I mean in your house traces of dna is everywhere from the knives we use has our dna. But the cops should of realize we need to confide the evidence in the hot zones bedroom, the blood on the sink, the shit and the room Rudy entered. I just had this impression that this detective obviously liked the attention of having this American girl in jail. Even some of the attorneys insulted us because of being careful with evidence. And the cops certainly just were questionable telling her she has aids and stuff like wow.
it's quite fortunate most of us don't experience a murder of someone we're associated with
I would preferred to watch this as a series, I would have like to see the story broken up properly like making a murderer.
Making a murderer proved he went to jail when he was innocent, then it proved he murdered a girl. That is what MAKING a murderer means.
In order to believe that Knox and Sollecito are innocent, you have to overlook the following:
Knox's accusation against her employer, a claim she made after less than TWO HOURS of being interviewed (not 40, like Team Knox would have you believe - this is a proven fact) and stuck to for 3 weeks, letting her innocent boss rot in jail all the while.
The fact that Meredith Kercher’s blood was found mixed inside Knox’s fresh DNA in 5 different spots in the bathroom.
The fact the Knox was bleeding on the day of the murder, and left blood smeared in the bathroom, blood which she herself admits was not there the day before.
Sollecito’s DNA on Meredith’s bra clasp - with a 16 loci match, the probability that the DNA belongs to someone else is one in a trillion, and with only ONE other DNA trace of him in the cottage (cigarette butt) the idea of contamination is near impossible.
Knox’s DNA on the handle of the murder weapon and Meredith’s on the blade. Sollectio tried to explain this by saying he had accidentally pricked Meredith with his knife while she had been at his house. She had never been there.
The THREE sets of bloody footprints, one a match for Guede, one a match for Sollecito, and one in Knox’s size, in her own DNA, mixed with Meredith’s.
The single bloody footprint on the bathmat, which is a perfect match for Sollecito, and also, being the only bloody footprint with no others around it, is undisputed proof a clean up happened.
The blatantly staged crime scene, with glass on TOP of the clothes strewn around, a near impossible window entry point, and not a single trace of Guede anywhere in that room, not to mention the fact Knox and Sollecito ‘knew’ nothing had been taken before anyone had even looked.
The fact that Guede’s footprints lead right out Meredith’s room out the front door and he has an alibi for the rest of the night, meaning we KNOW it wasn’t Guede who returned to the scene hours later, staged a burglary, cleaned up and moved the body.
The fact that Knox’s lamp was found in Meredith’s room with no fingerprints whatsoever - more proof of a clean up.
The incredible amount of changes in her account before, during, and after she was arrested.
Total lack of alibi after multiple attempts, and then Sollecito withdrawing his alibi for her.
Her dubious account of her activity the morning after the murder, including her lies about Meredith’s locked door, her reaction to the blood, and the contradictions to this she makes in her testimony, email home, and in her book.
The fact Knox knew several details about her murder she could not possibly have known: cause of death, position of body, that there had been more than one attacker, that Meredith had been assaulted etc.
The frantic call she made to her mother in the middle of the night that she ‘forgets’ making.
The witness who saw her and Sollecito by the cottage on the murder night.
The shopkeeper who saw her when she claimed to be in her bed sleeping.
Her overall behaviour after the murder.
And I can go on, and on, and on. My point is that, whatever opinion people have as to their guilty or innocence, there is enough evidence to convict, and however many times those claims of “no evidence" are repeated, it doesn't make it true.
This should get more than 1000 upvotes. This is true!!
And why Knox freaked out when detective & team only ask her "do you notice if any of knife here missing?".
Also how can she told one other dorm mate about Meredith Suffering? Like the details in Meredith's neck??
Knox is definitely the Director here. In my personal opinion, it could be that she have mental illness that got worse with alcohol & drugs she consumed even that night. That mental illness that said someone have unstable emotions & will fired up when they see people they dislike & in a lot of denials for what happened in her life & what they did.
Not to mention she also have higher sexual desires that it could be true about four-ways-sex-game. Look how she even have boyfriend that they style is so Harry Potter that book/movie she love so much.
She said she never fight or have arguments with Meredith but their dormmates said they had arguments few times that lead to cold fight.
I hate how Solecito & Knox free after 4 years.
The media overseas & America's government really tried to save her & success, just for the sake of prestige, international relations, politics. I mean yeah it's not unusual in any country unless the leader/president have peasants-soul like president in my country, that won't even try to save the real victims of our people in any country, let alone those who guilty.
2 hours can seem like forever when being interrogated. Cross contamination explains the rest. Mistakes were made. Also just because someone is weird or odd does not make them a killer.
Just explain to us why Knox transported the knife from Raffaele's flat to the crime scene. All you gotta do.
Lol so Knox decides to move her lamp to Meredith's room and clean it of finger prints. Why would she do that lol?
@@spenser9908did you think about the possibility of it being the opposite way? That the knife was brought to His apartment After the murder so that the murder weapon wouldn’t be found so quick, or, as they could believe at that time, never?
I’m still wondering about what she said regarding the flashback, the “meredith’s screaming” statement!!! Likeeeee, THAT SHOULD BE IMPORTANT. I don’t seems she’s making that up. That’s the only genuine statement i’ve heard from her in this film
Did she say she had a flashback of Meredith screaming??
Amanda Knox and OJ Simpson should get married.
Everybody knows she's guilty!
If you dont know how any of this stuff works yea lmaoooo
I hadn't actually realised before watching this that the concrete evidence against her was quite so poor. It just feels like she knows more about what happened than she is letting on but a hunch is not enough to throw someone in prison for life. The main issue is there is no convincing narrative as to what actually happened, probably because the police were fixated on Knox.
Plenty of evidenc left out of tv fiction. themurderofmeredithkercher.com
@Alex Glasson - I’ve read hundreds of comments on this case; and they always fall into one of 3 groups:
1. “I think she’s guilty.”
2. “I think she’s innocent.”
3. “I think she knows more than she’s telling.”
Whether she’s guilty or innocent, Amanda is right about one thing: there’s no middle ground. The third statement - “she knows something” - just seems like a cop-out. What exactly do you think she doesn’t know? What exactly do you think she isn’t telling? If she wasn’t at Raffaele’s apartment, then where was she? At the house? Outside the house? Was she a witness? An accomplice? Is she covering for somebody?
You can’t just say “she knows more” and then leave it at that.
@@ipsosmaati1971 This link isn't up anymore...is the site still around?
I'm betting if you watch another documentary, you'll get all the evidence you want. This is like Making a Murderer. It's obvious who did it, but you can create a compelling "documentary" leaving out all the damning evidence to make it appear however you want.
If she were innocent then why was she not in fear for her own life? A psycho killer was on the loose. A normal reaction would be to get the hell out of Perugia, yet she isn't concerned and doesn't leave. In fact, she asks the other roomate if the living arrangements were going to be the same "after this is over."
Had she left they would have said she is fleeing the country because of guilt.
no if she left the country she would have been accused of fleeing out of guilt. infact her family wanted her to come home but she said no.
She was naïve enough to think she was in a position to help the police, she didn't think she had anything to worry about...at least as far as being a suspect in this murder but she was afraid to be alone, the police gave her a hard time for being at the police department with Sollecito when he'd been summoned but she was there because as far as she knew there was a killer on the loose and she was afraid to be left at Sollecitos apartment alone.
TSB There are killers everywhere, idiot. You can't go anywhere safe.
TSB You must have shit run over twice for brains to type that depth of stupidity
This is the problem with this generation. Everyone is ready to call someone guilty without giving them a fair trial. You are always innocent until proven guilty. She went through a trial and was found innocent. There wasn't enough evidence to say she did it. The real crime here is how incompetent the Italian police was throughout the whole investigation. At the end of the day is there something kinda off with Amanda? I think most people would say yes but that still doesn't mean she did it.
I totally agree with you. I think that's why this case is so interesting. People hating on her and blaming her just shows how people react emotionally instead of rationally, I believe you could not convince these people that she's not guilty. At the end, I believed she didn't do it, because of all the evidence, but I must admit I feel she is not that innocent, or at least that she's not telling something. I am not able to give you a straight answer because of how horrible the investigation went. At the end, they let her free so it means she's innocent, so nothing left to do.
Her behavior was totally reprehensible but being a sociopath doesnt mean she was guilty.
What behavior?
The killer that got away.
His name was Rudy.
The body was found covered with a blanket... In most cases, bodies are covered by the murderer because the victim was in close association with him/her. The murderer out of guilt and due to the shared bond of relation cannot bear to witness the dead body so he/she covers it up. Similarly, if the murderer is close to the victim, they would also use the pillow to asphyxiate the victim because they can't watch them die due to the guilt.
In this case too I'm sure the victim knew the killer.. and that it wasn't done by a random stranger/burglar.
Right. Out of shame, not only because they knew each other well. Rudy knew her longer than Knox did. ;)
Pillow was used durin the rpe, and she was kiIIed by suffocating on her blood with 7 stab woundz to the neck area in order to stop the screamin durn the rpe by rudy. But ok
Yea Rudy did it
Guilty.
And so is Sollecito. All three murderers should now be doing life without parole or looking at needles. It's too bad that Italy doesn't have the death penalty.
In the State of Washington, where Knox resides, this wouldn't have been a death penalty case.
You are really a very special kind of stupid. In Washington state this case would have involved special circumstances of sexual assault and possibly maiming. All three killers would have been tried together and convicted very quickly as there would not have been any PR campaign to save them and they would have been treated just like common scumbag murderers who they really are. Sentences would have included life without parole or needles. And they would be in the ground proper now. Amen.
Sorry but there is more evidence against Knox than Rudy Guede. You may leave now.
Les Grossman The crime scene is that tiny bedroom, please tell me what evidence in that room implicated knox.
This looks really good. Some great documentaries Netflix are releasing this month
Man, that actress playing her is really bad. I don't believe a single word that comes out of her mouth.
Arthur Wild that is her. It's the real her
Quinn Ahmed ..... i think he was joking
Quinn Ahmed r/woooooooosh
only today I watched several videos about the Meredith Kercher case and what to say is that if you committed or were complicit in that death, fate will charge you one day. If you are innocent then you have nothing to fear, but one thing is certain, there is a lot of strange things in this story. No one can keep the inner demons asleep forever. May God you did nothing that night.
“Two Wolves”: A Cherokee Legend
An old Cherokee is teaching his grandson about life. “A fight is going on inside me,” he said to the boy. “It is a terrible fight and it is between two wolves. One is evil - he is anger, envy, sorrow, regret, greed, arrogance, self-pity, guilt, resentment, inferiority, lies, false pride, superiority, and ego.” He continued, "The other is good - his is joy, peace, love, hope, serenity, humility, kindness, benevolence, empathy, generosity, truth, compassion, and faith. The same fight is going on inside you - and inside every other person, too.” The grandson thought about it for a minute and then asked his grandfather, “Which wolf will win?” The old Cherokee simply replied, “THE ONE YOU FEED.”
She did it and got away with by pleading the victim. A fucking monster.
Yes she did. Have you seen the clips of her singing here on youtube?
she's the murdered and now you're doing of her a millionaire
Very strange you would walk into a bloody bathroom and have a shower and given it wasn't just period blood wouldn't you question it a bit more and the fact that the girls door was shut? Something is still very off about the whole thing. Why blame the bar man if you were innocent anyway?
“I was extremely shocked about what happened to her” she’s a lierrrrrr!!
she looks terrible these days
I think she looks great.
Yes, I agree. She looks like a POS now.
+ajdc88 dawg this is coming from someone who looks like a black weaboo lololol
Guilty conscience is definitely not good for one's beauty. She is not even recognizable to the young women with the movie star good looks when Meredith was slaughtered.
well her life was basically taken from her By the italian government
It's so sad a girl died, but keep in mind: Amanda was 20, she just fell in love for a week and was giddy and her Roomate; Meredith, she only knew a few weeks. This was not just the murder of one girl, but two in a way and a young innocent man. The press, the police, the public, tortured and crushed the soul of an innocent girl and boy because the police had it in for them and so did the press but there was NO evidence or even motive for them to murder her yet the real killer had all the motive and evidence. Very weird story. Reminds me of the witch trials and the very ignorant and hypocritical Christians doing monstrous things through superstition of female sexuality and Independence. DonT people understand that what they did to Amanda and her boyfriend was also a grave offense to Meredith? Her actual killer got less time due to that back woods, torch and pitch fork trial. Shame in humans. All who took part in that will have lifetimes of karma to pay off for every second those two kids spent rotting in an Italian prison.
GerMart Knox & Sollecito had the choice of a fast track trial. Their parents would not allow them to plead guilty, even though their parents knew they killed Meredith. That’s what the life of one girl is worth, 0 yrs. Both murderers are free.
People underage kill...people with no clear motives kill too .We are not living in a fairy world. Wake up.
What baffles me is if they were innocent (Amanda and her Bf) why did they say lies and then change their stories during the investigation??? Dont bullshit me with the coerced confession. I think they both panicked and said shit because they were interrogated separately and they didnt know what the other told the police.. they got cold feet and tried to save their asses so they told different stories and changed it to favor them after they found out there were weak evidences against them. I think they knew more than what they were claiming for about the night meredith got killed. I think even if they werent the one that kill her at least they knew the whole story about what really happened that night....
She did it alright
There's no evidence whatsoever that she committed the murder. So why are some people so fixated on the idea that it was her?
OysterHunter
The tabloids exploited this case and promoted the witch hunt for their own profits. I guess many people in some countries actually take the tabloids seriously.
Crime with multiple victims and Knox is one of em.
She has certainly made a lot of money out of not killing somebody.
Here's what was sad about this entire story and what is still sad to this day. First, this girl is obviously not guilty in any way. Sadly the cops painted a negative picture of her which sat in the media for years and now people feel kinda iffy about her. Second, people almost forgot about Meredith and what she must've gone through, and working to find her killer. Third, they always tried to paint Amanda as some strange sex freak who did real out there acts.
In reality, and I'm sorry to say this - Most girls experiment with freaky type sex stuff. Even the most normal seeming girls and freaks and try some real out there stuff. I'm in my 40's and have had my share of the most beautiful girlfriends, really sweet and normal girls. Then I started having sex, really having sex - not just those first few years where we are trying to figure out what sex is, but really having sex and discovering what I liked. 80% of the girls I dated, including my ex-wife were into some real wild stuff, at least what society would see as wild. In reality, what people do in their bedrooms is between them and it shouldn't be judged. I can remember being in my early 20's, being at my girlfriends place, and finding with her a huge stash of really freaky porn in her father and mothers closet. We threw it on and even for us it was a little too much. I always thought her dad and mom were so "normal", and after that I was so shy around her mom because I knew what she watched.
Later as I got into my 30's I really began experimenting with sex. I dated girls who wanted to be smacked, choked, spanked, cuffed, and boy oh boy the outfits these girls enjoyed wearing. Even my ex-wife dug this stuff. So if fathers really knew what their daughters were into, they wouldn't be so quick to judge. If mothers looked at their own lives and remembered all the freaky stuff they probably did, they wouldn't be so quick to judge.
Amanda is innocent, and I feel the authorities painted a really messed up picture of her. When in reality it wasn't all that strange at all. Just another girl, who sadly got caught up in the something she had nothing to do with. That bald investigator was and is the worst, that guy is a complete retard and a dumbass. Listening to him talk is so frustrating, the man sounds like he's living some murder mystery movie, a corny one. It was because of this man that all this happened. What an idiot.
Rest in Peace Meredith and peace to her family.
I believe she’s not the killer but she’s definitely knows something! Something immensely went wrong that night. Wish there’s a cctv or something
Momsy Aziz i don t think... there is not even evidence that she was the murder... they say ah her dna is on the knife... I am sorry but the dna of my roomate is also all over my flat... because we are roomates... but italian police has always been super shit😂
Karen V Read the facts before you write false statements.
Amanda's PR propaganda got through to poor Karen.
😐 mignini was trying to look good again in the public eye so honed in on her, they tried using the bra clasp as evidence once it became useless after they kicked it around the house for days hence DNA transfer, the kiIIr admitted they werent there untiI mignini offered a reduced sentence after they got the max so the kiIIr switched to bIaming knox, they told knox she couldnt have a lawyer and that they were interviewing her as a *witness*, they did it for about 4 days for hours and manipulstd her till they wore knox down into sayin what they wanted so shed be Ieft aIone, they didnt let knox contact her parents, they tried using her sexuaI past against her, mignini repeatedly switched stories on knox because each one he made up had no evidence, no polygraph used, etc. AIways th0se who d0nt know how thls stuff workz that wantz ta say sum
Not to mention rudys criminaI hist0ry. The kiIIr was arrested and reIeased after roughly 10 yrs and knox whos innocent is the one still being slandered and questioned.
When someone is innocent, they have nothing but questions. When someone is guilty, they have nothing but answers.
What a stupid statement.
She’s guilty 100 procent sure
yo she said i am you yo that means shes guilty yo
Only with people with limited comprehension.
Nancy Parker lol got that right the Italian justice system is completely fucked up there they had the actual murderer but they wanted her they had all the evidence against him and he finally admitted then his story changed to try and point the finger at her witch was definitely cohearst
Cohearst? Did you... did you mean "coerced"? The word that actually exists?
+a7threvolution We all make spelling mistakes, why make an issue of it?
@@nancyparker1044 nancy parker phd in psychology here. She is a psychopath.
What is wrong with these investigators! Tons of evidence in that house but, let’s convict the one who acts a bit funny. These people need to be re educated! Good grief.
The entire time I was like “WHAT WAS GOING ON INSIDE GIULIANO’S HEAD!!”
Why th did he make so many assumptions, rather than trying to find solid evidence!!
Damn......just leaving a log in the toilet like that.....
PART 1 OF 3:
On the day after her murder, Meredith Kercher’s blood was found in
many places in her bedroom and on a bare right-foot print on the
bathroom floor mat. But no footprints were found in the 10-foot-plus
stretch between those two bloody locations - all hard-surface floors in
the bedroom, hallway and bathroom. In addition, after she died,
Meredith’s bra had been cut off, and her body had been moved and
repositioned - to make it appear she’d been raped, the police
speculated. Finally, her body had been covered with a comforter. No one
knew why, though various theories were offered.
This is undisputed. Although the prosecution’s “staged rape” theory
was speculation, the defense, far from challenging it, took it a step
further, arguing that Meredith indeed had been raped and then killed by
Rudy Guede, acting alone. Guede’s DNA was found in several places in
Meredith’s bedroom, including inside her body. Amanda and Raffaele could
not have been there, the defense insisted, since none of their DNA was
found in Meredith’s bedroom (other than Raffaele’s DNA found on
Meredith’s bra clasp - more on that below).
Granted, Meredith’s bedroom was right next to the bathroom. But it
would have required at least a 10-foot leap, with a 90-degree turn near
the end, to reach the bloody bath mat from the bloody areas of
Meredith’s bedroom without touching down somewhere in between. And
whoever made that 10-foot leap-and-turn obviously didn’t mind leaving a
bloody footprint on the bath mat when he landed. It doesn’t matter here
whose bloody footprint was on the bath mat. The blood in both Meredith’s
bedroom and on the bath mat indisputably was Meredith’s. That’s all
that matters here. What accounted for the blood-free 10-foot gap?
A 10-foot leap-and-turn? Or perhaps the person had a blood-free left
foot, on which he hopped to the bathroom so his bloody right foot
wouldn’t leave any footprint along the way. When he got there, despite
his careful effort to avoid leaving a bloody footprint, he stepped on
the bath mat with his bloody right foot. One can imagine other
possibilities, but only one stands out as plausible: More bloody
footprints were made on the hard-surface floors between the two bloody
locations, but those footprints were cleaned up.
In other words, there was no 10-foot leap-and-turn, no
blood-free-left-foot hopper who inexplicably changed his mind upon
arrival and left a bloody right footprint. Originally there was blood in
Meredith’s bedroom, a bloody footprint on the bath-mat, and bloody
footprints on the hard-surface floors in between. Those bloody
footprints were cleaned up. The bloody stain on the bath-mat was more
stubborn and could
only be diluted (just as Raffaele later described it).
Whoever cleaned up the bloody footprints may also have moved and
covered Meredith’s body - or at least knows who did. The question is
obvious: Who did these things, and why would that person take such a
risk?
If you came home to find a bloody murder had been committed there,
would you say: “I don’t think I’ll call the police just yet. First I’ll
clean up this bloody mess, reposition the victim’s body and make some
other changes so it appears she was raped, and then cover her up. Sure,
the police may find out about the murder from someone else, in which
case they might show up and be suspicious because I’m destroying and
altering evidence of a murder that I’ll claim to know nothing about. But
that’s a risk I’m willing to take. I just can’t stand to leave such a
mess, or to leave a dead body lying in that particular position -
uncovered, no less.”
Utterly implausible? I think so. Yet it’s all but certain
that such a clean-up and body-repositioning occurred. So, again, the
questions are: Who did these things, and why would that person take such
a risk?
Then there’s the “burglary” in Filomena’s bedroom. Both courts that convicted Amanda concluded she had staged it,
and Rudy Guede was not even charged. Amanda nevertheless insisted a
burglary actually happened and that Guede was the burglar. That is how
Guede had gotten into the house, Amanda claimed, though sometimes she
speculated instead that Meredith had invited him in (an alternate
explanation that naturally makes one wonder who the “burglar” was).
In any event, the “burglar” was not convincing. He allegedly threw a
10-pound rock through a window 13 feet above the ground (which Meredith
apparently didn’t hear), scaled a 13-foot wall in plain view from the
street, climbed through the broken window without disturbing any of the
broken glass spread across the windowsill, threw clothes out of
Filomena’s closet onto her bed but then decided not to take anything
(including jewelry, a digital camera, and a laptop in plain sight), went
to Meredith’s room and raped and killed her, and then ran out the front
door, tracking Meredith’s blood along the way. Broken window glass was
found on top of items thrown onto Filomena’s bed - on top - suggesting
her window had been broken after her room was ransacked, not before. The
“burglar” left no DNA, fingerprint, footprint, mud, grass stain, or any
other trace in Filomena’s bedroom, on the windowsill, on the outside
wall, or on the ground below. No one’s DNA was found in Filomena’s
bedroom - not even Filomena’s - except for Amanda’s DNA, mixed with
Meredith’s blood.
Once again: Who carried out this real or staged burglary, and why?
END OF PART 1 OF 3
PART 2 OF 3:
There is evidence of a great deal more than just a clean-up and body-repositioning. Just a few examples:
1. Despite the clean-up, Amanda’s DNA, mixed with Meredith’s blood,
was found in five different spots in three different locations
(bathroom, hallway, Filomena’s bedroom). Some was visible to the n@ked
eye; some was revealed by Luminol.
2. Raffaele’s DNA was found on Meredith’s bra clasp. Although this is
undisputed, defense lawyers blamed it on “contamination” (the bra clasp
had lain on the floor of Meredith’s sealed-off bedroom until six weeks
after the murder). But even if the evidence-collectors had sneezed on
the bra clasp, and 47 different men had touched it that night, and it
had been trampled by 1,000 wild horses and chewed by 98 rabid dogs in
the six weeks before it was collected, no amount of contamination could
have caused Raffaele’s DNA to materialize on Meredith’s bra clasp. Most
Knox supporters nevertheless rely on this “contamination” argument to
insist that no DNA of Amanda or Raffaele was found in Meredith’s
bedroom.
3. The prosecution also argued (and the courts that convicted Amanda
and Raffaele agreed) that the bloody bath-mat footprint was “consistent”
with Raffaele’s footprint (though it may not have been his), and could
not have been Guede’s or Amanda’s. The defense disagreed: it was
Guede’s, they said. It seems that Guede’s right shoe (but not his left
shoe) had come off during his scuffle with Meredith. Guede postponed his
escape to wash off his right foot, which was covered with blood even
though it managed to leave no footprint until Guede reached the bath
mat.
For one reason or another, Guede chose not to wash off his bloody
left shoe, which seems to have had a mind of its own. It left no
shoeprints in the bathroom while Guede was washing his right foot,
choosing instead to leave an unbroken string of bloody shoeprints in a
direct line from Meredith’s bedroom to the front door. Guede’s bloody
left shoe did pause once, however - just after leaving Meredith’s room,
so that Guede could lock Meredith’s door from the outside. He must have
done this by reaching behind his back with Meredith’s stolen room key,
since Guede’s bloody shoeprints all point toward the front door,
indicating he never turned around to face Meredith’s door after he’d
left her room. The prosecution argued, more plausibly, that it wasn’t
Guede who locked Meredith’s door - after all, he was careless enough to
leave the front door wide open. Instead, Amanda or Raffaele had locked
Meredith’s door after the murder, enabling them later to explain why
they hadn’t discovered Meredith’s body sooner.
4. Amanda’s fingerprint-free bedside lamp was found on the floor at
the foot of Meredith’s bed. Knox supporters say Meredith must have
borrowed it without asking (Amanda said that Meredith had never asked to
borrow it). Skeptics suggest the lamp was brought in to help illuminate
spots to be cleaned, and was inadvertently left there when the clean-up
was finished. All we know for sure is that Meredith’s room ended up
with extra lighting that November evening, while Amanda’s bedroom was
left with no light at all (Amanda’s room had no ceiling light - only her
bedside lamp).
5. Amanda’s “morning after” story raises eyebrows. She testified that
she came home that morning (November 2) to find her front door wide
open and blood in the bathroom that hadn’t been there before. She called
out to her roommates, but no one answered. She thereupon closed the
front door but knowingly left it unlocked, and took a shower. When she
finished, she realized she’d left her towel in her bedroom. She used the
bath mat - on which she’d just noticed a bloody footprint - to “hop,”
dripping wet and naked, back to her room to get her towel. Rather than
dry off in her room, she “hopped” back to the bathroom, still wet and
n@ked, on the same blood-stained bath mat, and dried off there. After
returning to her bedroom, now dry but still naked, Amanda dressed, and
then blow-dried her hair in the other bathroom. There she noticed an
unflushed toilet (which she left unflushed) containing what turned out
to be Rudy Guede’s f3ces. Though Amanda said all of this puzzled and
worried her, she didn’t notice that Meredith’s door was locked, and she
walked right past Filomena’s bedroom - at least four times - without
looking in and discovering the “burglary.” Filomena’s door was closed,
Amanda said, and she didn’t try to open it. Yet Raffaele said that when
he and Amanda returned to the cottage about an hour and a half later,
after breakfast, Filomena’s door was “wide open” when they walked in,
and he immediately noticed the “burglary.” Neither Raffaele nor Amanda
claimed to have wondered who had opened Filomena’s door in the meantime.
Even worse, recently Amanda made yet another change to her story:
Court testimony - June 12 2009
Amanda: “I used the mat to kind of hop over to my room and into my room,
I took my towel, and I used the mat to get back to the bathroom.”
Amanda Knox Blog:
Amanda says:
FEBRUARY 28, 2014 AT 15:15
2) “I took a shower and used the bathmat to shuffle a bit into the hall,
only to abandon that procedure part-way through because it wasn’t
accomplishing much.”
END OF PART 2 OF 3
PART 3 OF 3:
6. Amanda’s other stories were no less suspicious. The day after the
murder, she told the police she’d spent the entire evening and night at
Raffaele’s apartment and had no idea who had killed Meredith. A few days
later (under severe pressure, she insists), she told the police she’d
been home after all, had invited Patrick Lumumba in, and that Lumumba
had killed Meredith. The next day, in an entirely voluntary statement
she wrote with no one else present, Amanda said she was pretty sure
she’d been at Raffaele’s after all but nonetheless stood by her
recollection that Lumumba had killed Meredith. A few days later, Amanda
still remembered having been at Raffaele’s apartment, but now she was
certain that Lumumba had nothing to do with the murder. (How Amanda
could know anything about Lumumba’s guilt or innocence was unclear, of
course, once she’d returned to her claim that she’d been at Raffaele’s
apartment the whole time.) Unfortunately for
Lumumba, Amanda only told her mother this. Both Amanda and her mother
neglected to mention it to the authorities, even though Amanda said they
knew there was no evidence against Lumumba except Amanda’s accusation.
Lumumba languished in jail for over two weeks until he came up with an
airtight alibi. After Lumumba was released, Amanda said she felt
terrible that the police had wrongly arrested him.
********************************
The clean-up and body-move were proven beyond a reasonable doubt, and
the judges and juries that convicted Amanda also determined that she
had staged the “burglary.” Though it’s possible Amanda was not the
person who did those things (and also possible she was not the person
who locked Meredith’s door after the murderer left Meredith’s room),
inferences reasonably drawn from the clean-up and cover-up evidence,
together with the ample evidence summarized above (and other physical
evidence and testimony not mentioned here), solidly support the murder
conviction. The burden shifted to Amanda long ago to answer the tough
questions posed in this imaginary monologue:
Amanda, it’s clear that someone cleaned up after Meredith was
murdered. Someone also cut off her bra and repositioned her body - to
make it appear, we think, that she’d been raped. We think that person
also staged a burglary so it would appear the murderer hadn’t been let
in by someone who lived there. Even if a burglary actually happened, as
you insist, who in his right mind would risk drawing suspicion on
himself by cleaning up after the murder, or by moving and covering
Meredith’s body? And if he did bother to clean up, why would he ignore
his own bloody footprints? Why would he pause to lock Meredith’s door
with a key, and yet leave the front door wide open? It’s difficult to
believe you weren’t involved in the clean-up and body-moving, or why you
might have done those things for an innocent reason. The killer would
have no reason to have done them. Obviously Meredith didn’t. No one
suggests your two out-of-town roommates came back and did all this, or
that a stranger wandered in off the street and did it. Who does that
leave?
You, with or without Raffaele’s help. We found your DNA, mixed with
Meredith’s DNA, in five different places around the cottage - including
even Filomena’s bedroom, where you insist a burglary occurred. We didn’t
even find Filomena’s own DNA in her bedroom, much less any trace of a
burglar or anyone else - just your DNA, mixed with Meredith’s. You’ve
also told several different stories about where you were that night.
Sometimes you were home, sometimes you weren’t; sometimes you’re not
sure. Sometimes you invited Patrick Lumumba into your cottage and he
killed Meredith, sometimes you didn’t and Patrick had nothing to do with
the murder; sometimes you’re not sure. Sometimes you insist Guede broke
Filomena’s window and climbed in; sometimes you say Meredith must have
let him in; sometimes you’re not sure. And so on. Maybe you had nothing
to do with this gruesome murder, Amanda, but, frankly, we doubt
seriously that you’ve told us all you know about what happened that
night. Maybe it’s time you did. Better late than never.
END OF PART 3 OF 3
dude that us a lot of info in a short amount of time
That's pretty much the whole case. It's really not that complex as all the evidence points to Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito being the killers.
Just letting people know Grossman is a virulent Amanda Knox hater and will post BS here like he does at twitter. Check him out there.
I'm pissed that I can't come to a conclusion, but I lean towards guilty
Same. She has not been 100% honest from the start, and over the past decade made it all about her while the actual victim has been denied justice.
What evidence are you going on?
@@EllieDaisy They don't have evidence. They go on gut instinct like that insane cop, who thinks covering the body is a more "female" killer thing to do.
Its always funny when people who have no knowledge on this stuff wanna accuse the innocent. Hun theres a reason those Iike ya and mignini have n0 pIace ln law. 😐 mignini was trying to look good again in the public eye so honed in on her, they tried using the bra clasp as evidence once it became useless after they kicked it around the house for days hence DNA transfer, the kiIIr admitted they werent there untiI mignini offered a reduced sentence after they got the max so the kiIIr switched to bIaming knox, they told knox she couldnt have a lawyer and that they were interviewing her as a *witness*, they did it for about 4 days for hours and manipulstd her till they wore knox down into sayin what they wanted so shed be Ieft aIone, they didnt let knox contact her parents, they tried using her sexuaI past against her, mignini repeatedly switched stories on knox because each one he made up had no evidence, no polygraph used, etc. AIways th0se who d0nt know how thls stuff workz that wantz ta say sum
Must be because you're incredibly ignorant.
You have to look at the evidence for yourself and not depend on these forms of media to educate you. She and her bf are guilty. His past history is disgusting, and she found her soul mate. She knows what she did, and she's making bank off evil.
So having looked at the evidence yourself, what evidence exactly do you think supports their guilt?
What about Sollecito's past history do you think is 'disgusting'?
Making claims is easy; supporting them with evidence takes knowledge.
According to an interview with The Observer (via The Guardian) following that acquittal, Lumumba believes Knox was found not guilty because of status and appearances. “Amanda is free because she is American, but Americans are human like everybody," Lumumba said. As of last year, the 43-year-old Lumumba was living in Krakow, Poland with his wife. He has alleged that Knox's accusation and his involvement in this case lost him his business and made it impossible to find another job in Perugia. “What Amanda did I don’t know, but I think she knows why Meredith died," Lumumba told The Guardian.
Lumumba was paid 70,000 euros for an interview just after his release. Almost every single claim he made in that article he contradicted in his sworn court testimony: he did NOT fire Knox, his relationship with Knox was fine, he said the only thing he knew about the girls' relationship was that they were "friends" and never once mentioned Knox being 'jealous' of Kercher.
His dark, tiny, hole in the wall bar, Le Chic (I've been there), was not doing well financially when he hired Knox to try and get the university crowd to go there. They preferred Domus and and Red Zone. The PROSECUTOR, not Knox, kept Le Chic closed for THREE MONTHS after his release and total proof he had nothing to do with the murder. Why? First he claimed that the police beat, kicked and threatened him. Later he claimed that they treated him 'well' and he couldn't understand why Knox would say she hit. One way or the other, he was lying.
Brooo shes not guilty rudys dna was literally everywhere in that apartment
I think it's clear the first word he said she was not there períod
Italy issa mess lol poor Amanda
No. Read the evidence themurderofmeredithkercher.com
Evidence points that Amanda, her boyfriend, and Rudy were all there during the murder. Not matter if she actually committed the murder, she committed a crime and needs to let people know what really happened. She is using another girl’s story for attention and is a disgusting woman.
Supreme court said she was there...try again.
As a person can blame others without any evidence she's inocent
She didn’t do the murder but was part of it. That’s why she is wanted in Italy again. She could never come to Europe because Interpol would extradite her.
I’m watching this right now. Sometimes I wish Netflix had a comments section because I decided to take a break and come on youtube to see if anyone else was so mad about that journalist. What-the-hell??? He was talking about the murder like it was a movie. And honestly he said some offensive things about italians. Also, what the fuck is wrong with the police? They were all a joke. Like the wannabe Sherlock Holmes who said so many stupid things, and the police interviewers who acted like they are “the bad cops”, “let’s use psychological pressure to make them confess”.
I have not finished the doc yet, but it’s so annoying the way people behave so far.
yessss she did it, she killed that poor girl
@Piatequila Do you ever think for yourself?
The amount of blatant stupidity thrown around in the comment section is seriously worrisome. This is a 2 minute, 22 second trailer and people are without a doubt certain she's "GUILTY!!". Terrifying how ridiculously arrogant and proud they are for having 'figured it out so early on'. (i would laugh if it weren't so disgusting). If you actually watch the documentary and have even half a brain you'll conclude that she is in fact innocent. The unlawful contamination Italian police commit during investigations is disturbing and painful to observe even through a computer screen. The fact that some people watch the documentary from start to finish and are still confused, unsure, or even swearing she's still guilty is... confusing. Are these people trolls or high school drop outs? You decide.
that girl scare me i mean she's a bit creepy but i don't think she did it or had something to do with it she was accused so quickly seems weird
My only question is just where is her motive?? I mean yes you don’t always need one to commit a crime but like murdering your roommate in cold blood in a foreign country?? She had just gone on exchange, was in love, living the time of her life. Even if she and Meredith had opposite personalities I don’t really see this happening. Maybe she is suspicious at times and knows more of the story but I honestly don’t think she did it. I am just missing so much background information.
There was no motive as she is innocent. The prosecution gave multiple motives, none of which stood up to investigation. Rudy Guede, the convicted murderer, had motive: no job, no money and his rent was due. He had a history of burglary and being caught with stolen property.
This Mignini guy strikes me as someone who while he might be a good cop, he's infatuated with movies and got himself a sexy hollywood-esque case.
There is also something to say about a cops behaviour when they are sure of something in interrogation, you've been in that room hundreds of times and should recognize when someone is put in that position for the first time and not use it to get a case resolved quick because the world is looking at you.
HeadstrongHarpy What tactics? Mignini was exceptionally good at catching Knox in a lie or a “I don’t remember”. He could be compared to Juan Martinez, the lawyer who prosecuted Jody Arias & repeatedly caught her in her lies.
The amount of people trusting in the Italian police is ridiculous... They are as good as the Mexican police, that should tell you something.
I dont know what to think but she acting so cool or someting is still strange ...
I never believed that she did it. How do you act at that age? They had a crime scene with perfect DNA and other things. That investigator is full of crap, he’s no Sherlock Holmes, and why would you identify yourself with a character from the Victorian era?
When he said men never cover their victims I knew he was full of merda. How many other documentaries have there been over the years that disprove that point? Or maybe he should read In Cold Blood.
I’ve been a student in Italy. Law enforcement is an oxymoron.
she has a evil look in her eyes
No she doesn't - you are seeing what you want to see.
yeah she def does ive been around enough people with hiding phychotic tendecies and she has the same look now that doesnt make her guilty and i never heard her speak of any compassion towards the victim
Like the other poster said, you're seeing what you want to see. My daughter has a masters in the Mental Health Field and she's the one that got me to follow this case because she's obviously innocent, you can't diagnose someone with a mental illness with any accuracy without even meeting them.
i see thing's for what they are, i stopped seeing things for what i want them to be many years ago i have no idea if she is innocent or not but im sure many will agree with me that she has cold, souless eyes and i have street smarts wich is the ability to read people and a degree cant get you that and yes she shows no remorse towards her friend the victim she just cries about herself now i know that does not make her guilty but she def shows no compassion
atown Ish
Well, had you stuck to your education you might understand the definition of remorse, it's a deep regret for a wrong you've committed, since she didn't murder her friend, there's no reason for her to feel remorse. Did she feel sad that her friend had been murdered? Yes, and one of the boyfriends of the other roommates who was waiting in a car with her and Sollecito that more when the police were examining the crime scene, she broke down and cried several times so you're seeing just what you want to see, you haven't mentioned evidence, it's just what YOU and a few pro guilt idiots claim is something in her eyes and you're so street smart you neglected your education, good for you.
Are you familiar with Debra Milke? She was wrongfully convicted of killing her 4 yr old son without one shred of evidence, she spent 24 yrs in prison in Arizona and 22 of that was on death row. She said what happens when you are accused of a crime you are immediately put in a position where you're having to defend yourself, so all grieving is put on hold and the grieving doesn't continue until you are done fighting for yourself, so she got out of prison 2 or 3 yrs ago and realized she had never grieved for her little boy. I'm sure Knox felt terrible about Meredith, she showed it in the beginning but then she was put in a position where she was having to fight for her own life and I don't think you can really grieve and fight for your own life at the same time.....There's a lesson to be learned from others that have gone thru similar experiences as Knox did.
I truly believe that Amanda Knox is guilty.
@GerMart I know all the details, you didn''t need to write it. No matter what, because she lied the first, she lied about Patrick Lumumba. I believe Amanda is guilty, but there were not enough evidence to condamn her. It's my point of view.
@GerMart Eh va là-bas !!! Je connais les détails de l'affaire. Cette femme a menti a plusieurs reprises allant jusqu'à accuser un innocent étranger au meurtre. Elle a été acquitté parce que les preuves n'étaient pas suffisantes. Mais personne ne peut affirmer hors de tout doutes qu'elle est réellement innocente. Alors va faire un tour voir si j'y suis, petit américain de pacotille !!!
@GerMart Petit imbécile de première je suis francophone, le français c'est ma première langue alors va faire un tour, supporter d'Amanda Knox !!! Elle a menti sur Patrick Lumumba qui n'avait rien à voir dans toute l'histoire. Je me fiche de ta vie, qu'est-ce que cela peut bien me faire ?
American Crime Story: The People Vs. Amanda Knox -- Ryan Murphy make it happen!
omg that would be the best casting.
The fact that Amanda is still being attacked for this is insane. The ACTUAL rapist and murdered had irrefutable evidence. Amanda was traumatized by the BS that this case threw out her.
People forget that in Italy the legal system works differently than the USA, Police can actually employ far worse tactics than even the US; physically harming ON record interviewees and psychologically.
So how much money did Knox spend on making this Documentary trying to play a victim here??!
And how much did she spend trying to get get out of prison?!!
Amanda Knox, this female monster dares "i was a kid" but she was an ADULT and a cheap girl, narcissic, agressive and seducing, manipulating, her eyes are the devils !!! All of her tears are manipulations and nobody see it!
@@mademoiselle9492 Because you're crazy!
@@mademoiselle9492 exactly
@@horsie371close your mouth
Amanda demon RIP MEREDITH
That's so true. Why was she doing the Splits what a wierd behavior
I'm reading the book "awaiting to be heard" and it's a goddamn horror story of how you watch her good intentions turn into her condemnation it's a far more harrowing tale in her own words I wish nothing but curses on the Perugian PD how could they let that happen how dare they let this slide
She is trying so hard to mimic emotions but is in vain, you don't need a degree to observe the obvious. If you are not guilty there is no reason to lie and lie and change your story again and again. Nice try ....
@Jonathan Colatorti you think that changing the story was a response to methods used to trigger a "desired" response?
@Jonathan Colatorti I hope you are right! Thank you for commenting! But logic will not change my mind abt this case...