Best BUDGET TELEPHOTO Lens for Sony APSC | Tamron 70-300MM
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ต.ค. 2022
- My camera: Sony a6500
amzn.to/3TdwNCa (UK)
amzn.to/3jiygZN (US)
My telephoto lens: Tamron 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3
amzn.to/3v7qicj (UK)
amzn.to/4a38u0P (US)
street photography, pov street photography, pov photography street, pov night photography, pov photography new york , pov new york , new york pov photography, pov street photography new york, new york street photography,STREET PHOTOGRAPHY,SONY APSC,STREET PHOTOGRAPHY - SONY APSC ,STREET PHOTOGRAPHY SONY APSC, POV STREET PHOTOGRAPHY,OPTICALWANDER,OPTICAL WANDER,PIERRE LAMBERT,north borders,peter mckinnon
This video deserves way more like, lot of bangers pics, you made my mind on this lens 👌
thank you!! ❤️
Thank you very much for this video! You take incredible photos, I have been interested in this lens for a long time but very few videos put evidence of how it really works, thanks to you I have had it clearer, I love your photos! Greetings and thanks again from Colombia
thanks a lot! glad it was helpful :)
Great video and photos Jimmy! I recently bought this lens for my Sony ZV E10 based off this video as I’m going to NYC in November so watching this has got me excited 💪🏽
Hi, how do you find the lens so far?
I'm also planning to get this lens for my zve10 mainly for street and wildlife. Would love to hear how the lens is holding up for you as of now. Thanks!
Those chopper photos were stunning!! But the photo at 16:35 has to be my favourite though, not sure why. It was wild how the traffic appeared to be so close in the photo but then you looked up and we could sort of see all that clogged traffic in the far distance as a speck on the sceen while the road below you was nearly as empty as could be 😂 I look forward to seeing what else you might shoot with this crazy zoom lens!
thank you! yea that photo isnliterally one of the main reasons I wamted a telephoto haha. I saw some awesome shots in Japan someone took with a telephoto and the compression makes it look almost impossibly busy
Great POV and shots 👌 Looks like a great experience.
thank you!
This was an incredible video. Subbed, based on just this video. I picked up the Tamron lens the other day, cant wait to shoot on it. I had a Tamron 70-300 for my older Nikon, it was so much fun to shoot with
thank you! glad you liked the vid!
The Sony 70-350mm is a beast and razor sharp
You just helped me a lot with your video, I was wondering if the lens was worth it or not.... and if you know your craft, any tool is good to get the shot (I'm beginner and hobby photographer but want to do it as best as I can get it)
You really deserve my subscription haha
Keep going dude, your work is really good, see you in a next opportunity :)
thanks a lot! absolutely id say the lens was worth it, it has quickly become one of my favourites :)
best tool "to get the shot"? probably just practise
The photo of the Jewish guy walking out of the what-a-bargain had me so weak 😂🤦🏼♂️
Got this lens recently for the a6600 and it's a great. I wouldn't mind some extra VC/OSS as it gets a bit shaky on the far end, but then it wouldn't be sold for this price.
Great images from the helicopter!
thanks man! yea espesh given the price i think it's such a solid option
How bad is shooting video with this lens on a6600?
@@somnayak1 You mean in terms of stabilisation?
Handheld is not great. a6600 stabilisation is poor. But at this focal range, you can't get super steady videos with better stabilised body either.
For video, I'd suggest looking for 'VC' (Vibration Compensation) on Tamron lenses and 'OSS' (Optical Steady Shot) on Sony lenses.
These are stabilised lenses and will work great on a6600 for video.
@sleepless51 my sony a6400 don't has image stabilisation. But I don't want to shoot videos. How hard is it to take normal photos without any stabilisation on longe range?
@@ircdelacium2619 Not that hard. Just need to keep in mind the small shakes while holding the camera and keep the shutter speed slightly higher. That might need some compromise with the ISO depending on the lighting conditions.
Between this and the 17-70 or the Tamron 28-200, which to do you consider best for traveling with family and daily usage? Which is the more usable and still get great results? I love your videos!
Thanks! For my style of photos I definitely use the 17-70 most of the time, I’m not familiar with the 28-200 but it’s definitely a great zoom range! If it’s F2.8 it may be a killer option thought I would also consider adding the Samyang 12mm F2 or another wide angle for all the cool buildings you see when travelling
i absolutely love the photos. Can you suggest between this lens and Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS. I am using a sony 5100. I am also interested to know the post processing or the color grading you did to the photos.
i assume the sony lens is a lot cheaper? If it isn't cheaper I'd consider Tamron as it has 90mm more focal range
But do make sure to check compatibility with a5100 as I'm not familar with that line
Grading wise I used lightroom :)
I have both lenses and would recommend the Tamron over the Sony definitely but I am using it on an A6500 which has inbuilt stabilization.
Can you make please a edit tutorial?
i love your vibe! 🙏🙏 realy liked those colors where amazing.😍
Thanks! I got some on my channel but also have my presets on my website if you want the quickest shortcut to my editing style!
Hey loved the vid.Just wanted to know were these pics of the streets edited, could you please tell me the preset that you used?
thanks! glad you liked the vid - I am actually launching my own presets by the end of the year (which are the ones I used) so watch this space! ;)
What do you suggest this lens or Sony 70-350mm G? Sony one has 50mm more focal length and OSS also. At my place (India), the price difference is 20k Rupees (due to some discount on Sony lens), which is roughly 250 USD.
depends if you need that extra 50mm - check some images online comparing 300mm and 350mm and see if you need it - I personally went w the cheaper option cause I didnt meed the extra reach
@@JimmyShixin Thanks, I bought Sony one, because many people said OSS is important in such longer focal lengths, and as I had A6400, it didn't had IBIS.
why didn't you use the viewfinder to compose your shots while in the helicopter? having your arms pressed against your body would offer a lot more stabilization, plus you wouldn't have to worry about the screen glare
good point! I didn’t struggle that much with shakiness because I could use high shutter speeds during the day so didn’t need to worry about blurry shots that much - but mostly it’s because I actually never use the viewfinder. At first it was because using the screen was better for POV style videos for the viewers and over time I just got used to not using the EVF so I turned it off
Great vid, but the thumbnail says it’s a 17-300mm :D
ahh im dumb good spot! gotta change that later
Why not the Tamron 18-300?😊
Good Q - I did consider it but ended up deciding against it cause I already have the Tamron 17-70 F2.8 and the 70-300 is a bit cheaper and lighter than the 18-300
@@JimmyShixin
My plan is the same, but first I need the samyang 35mm f/1.4 FullFrame lens this being the nifty 50 for my current apsc and gonna be useful in future when I upgrade to Fullframe
So the Tamron 17-70 f/2.8 has unique focal lengths and better than their FE lens so .....
Does this work in a Sony zv e-10
so the lens is technically a full frame lens (for Sony A7iii for example) but I'm using it on an APSC here
Given the zve10 is also an APSC camera I think you should be able to use it. The tamron would become a 105-450MM equivalent (1.5x crop factor) but definitely double check as I'm not 100% sure about the zve10 compatibility
@@JimmyShixin just used it a a basketball game on my zv e-10 and I honestly thought it was great
@@andrewm1556 hey! I've just got a zve10 & am looking at this lens. Are you still happy with it? :)
@@badgalgamer8589 for sure I’m still using it
Great! That's good to hear! Thank you :)
Do you think this lens works well with nature/bird photography?
Yes but not a very low aperture, for nature you’ll need high shutter speeds so your camera won’t let as much light in
Better would be a telephoto with a lower min. Aperture like F2.8 but those cost £££
Bro dont get me wrong but you can doo that helicopter think whit a drone too
probs but being in a helicopter is sick af
Another point though - in many cities flying drones is illegal as it’s not safe w airplanes etc
Also camera quality is always much higher than drones
Having said that though drone is obvs a more affordable alternative to a helicopter haha so fair point!
@@JimmyShixin ofcourse mannn
@@JimmyShixin I live in Germany, there is the same problem here. Flying a drone is prohibited in most places. Also, I never thought about it like you said, thank you for informing me.
@@Demir_ile_Almanya sometimes i swear there are lile drone jammers as well, think that's how I lost my drone in Hamburg lol (it crashed near the Elbphilarmonie)
This lens is absolute garbage
What makes you say that a bit of editing and the picture would come out great
@@AssetoJay No. I owned this piece of garbage. I hated this piece of garbage. Bad Fstop range made it impossible to use, boring images with flat lifeless colors, chromatic abbreviations everywhere. It sucked
@@idkanymore3382 I agree with the f stop pretty high but as shown in the video images looked pretty good obviously most where edited but they seemed solid even the one at night on top of World Trade Center which lens you rocking with now
@@AssetoJay I dont own any telephoto right now, I felt id wait until I have the money for a real telephoto with at least 2.8 stops. The issue here is that you are viewing a youtube video with compression and not seeing the raws. Its pretty bad when it comes to true color rendition. I just found it boring. I only own Zeiss/GMasters now