£1000 Fine For Yellow Lamborghini Phone Driver - FJ19DHP
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 ก.ย. 2022
- £1000 fine and £190 costs. No points though, because the entity prosecuted was most likely a company. I'm going to assume that the driver owns the company and the company owns the car, in which case the driver would still be out £1190. Other explanations are possible, of course.
FJ19DHP
FJ19-DHP
FJ19 DHP
202011071445
#lamborghini #yellowlamborghini #yellowlambo #lamborghinilondon #londonlambo #londonlamborghini - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
The amount fined is a drop in the ocean to the company that hired this car out just to protect their elite clientele
Yep couldnt agree more, it is no deterrent
Anyone who’s entire defence to being caught doing something illegal is “you’re jealous” is a complete bellend. But then, his driving beforehand showed that already…
I’m not jealous, but am certainly concerned he thinks operating such a powerful machine without giving it proper concentration in such a busy city is acceptable!
I mean driving around in a noisy yellow Lamborghini screams bellend. I'd get a less obnoxious colour if I had the money haha.
He almost kerbs the heck out of those wheels when pulling away too 😂
Yes only a person who has some major issues would buy such a car, most likely mummy and daddy never paid him any attention 😭
He's a rich Arab, that's why. More money than sense.
@@Zerpentsa6598 Obviously not a difficult achievement in his case. Even if he only had a fiver to his name he'd have more money than sense.
£1000 for someone who owns a car like this is like spending £1. Not good enough. And no points taken off is frankly an insult to those who actually drive carefully and respect the rules.
£50*
He'll come to attention sooner or later.
Therefore he should be charged more than the legal fine? This reeks of jealousy
@@sowell7525 it’s not jealousy at all, I’m not a petrolhead and literally don’t care about cars at all 🤣 why do people have this type of mindset… I have zero interest in cars…
Its a rental
I think there should be a change in the law, in how this is dealt with. So the registered owner of the car, is asked who was driving the car, and refuses to answer. In court the registered owner gets asked to name the person who was driving
If the owner fails to explain who was driving the car, then car will be seized and sold at auction
Plus the 6 points add to the owners license.
In case of crime, yes. In case of a rules violation, car should be scrambled in front of company holder.
What of those who are unable to name a driver because some one lost a log or didn't sign for a van that day, punitive law is bad law but what ever makes you feel good
In this case the car was owned by a company, not an individual. That’s the loophole.
So instead of the individual getting points, the company gets a fine for not nominating who was driving.
@@ihadmyfill Any decently run company should be able to know which of their customers or employees is using what vehicle at any time. Especially rental companies. It's not an excuse in my opinion.
Once again, loopholes for the wealthy to allow them to get away without points or real consequences. A grand doesn't sound like a big enough fine for a Lambo owning company
Yup disgusting he didn’t get points
Not really anyone can do this I have several motorbikes registered to a company whom I then rent them from took me a couple of days research and a couple of hours to setup. Don't moan play the game use their rules against them
@@ihadmyfill
...and you posted the comment while driving one of them, I dare say. ;)
every fine you can drop the points with lawer that take 300$-400$. not such a big deal, i done it multipule times
Probably leased or on finance. The reason I say that is he seemed so quick to say you’re jealous so he was only driving that to try and look like the big I am. Truly wealthy people are so used to driving cars like this that its normal to them.
Another legal system failure. I went to court a couple of weeks ago to give evidence against a drink driver who had driven off after a serious accident. I wasn't called to give evidence as she was found not guilty. The reason? The CPS failed to forward one document to her lawyer at the right time. Result? One drink driver gets off Scot free. Disgusting.
Sorry but I would seriously hurt someone and tske the law into my own hands if they got off with it
Yes and she will go round saying "found not guilty" and people will think ah she wasn't DUI then. A bit like that social worker that got away with negligence but some sort of police procedure wasn't done correctly and she went round telling people "thrown out of court".......................
I find it strange that someone would spend £3-400k on a vehicle and then drive it in an area of the city where he is limited to travel at the same speed as a passing push bike. But then again, if he took it out on the open road, he wouldn't have his daily fix of an 'envious' audience looking at him. Narcissism at its finest !
They only drive it here to show off, they mostly rented vehicles and it's a good way to boost social media followers, it's sad but that is the reality.
There's nothing to be envied of a Lamborghini, it's just over the top Italian made garbage. Some people must look cool.
U need to get your money up Akh
And he’ll have a small penis
Your jealous 😂😂😂. What an Ego… & a pointless car.. 1st gear continuously..
no one is jealous of a middle aged man in a lamborghini I promise you
You missed , fat .
I like the way a £200 bike can easily keep up with a £200,000 supercar in London traffic - shows how pointless the car is.
The car isn’t only for speed, you dumfk
Most parts of London you could probably walk quicker than that car, Eddy.👍
Why be so sour just because you will never be able to afford a car like that?
Jealously talk
Stopped a couple of times to txt in the middle of the road that's why ! big ego though
A high performance car rushing around, undertaking and weaving in and out of traffic...and yet he still wasn't any faster than you for the distance you filmed him! And yet a common complaint from drivers is that cyclists hold up the traffic.
Lost count of how many times I've been overtaken inconsiderately or even dangerously on my bike, only to catch them up at the next set of lights. Big risk, zero gain.
@@dazediss6629 Actually yes you are correct as it's city traffic. Totally fair comment. However (and as you also correctly mentioned) he is weaving dangerously in and out of traffic, which is what I was really eluding to.
@@ibs5080 yes exactly it's called Driving without due care and attention. The phone use is the most serious here.
And it is not undertaking that's what we do if he kills someone, it is known as overtaking on the inside.
He looks down on every body else as under dogs
Yeah exactly. Why can't some people understand its single occupant cars that cause congestion and slow down traffic in cities? and bikes help to ease congestion.
I reckon he did over £1k of damage to his wheels on the kerb at the end of the video as well, just for good measure
Yeah I saw that it looked like a nice shaving off the alloys 😆
I was going to comment about this, but wasn't sure if he actually made contact. I hope so....
As always the rules are different for rich people. He'll continue driving like that as a £1000 fine is a slap on the wrist for a Lambo owner
Hi Mikey, you also missed that he wasn't wearing his seatbelt, which should have been picked up by the police from the video.
£500 banger, or £500,000 Supercar - *get off your phone when you are driving* ! Its Simple !
Pretty shocking. I mean the driver's face is in the video. Could the police not dig a little deeper and link the car to the actual driver? If the entity is work a few million then 1k is nothing much
They don't have the resources I assume.
the clothes he was wearing were probobaly worth more than that
money talks.......................
I like the way you left him to his delusion when he kept saying you're jealous. I do that myself when people can't be reasoned with, so it's good to see someone else using the "rise above it" approach too. Well done, CM. 😁👍
Keep up the good work dude..I enjoy all your videos.
Lovely catch Mikey..
These selfish clowns need shaming and even bigger fines, dangerous people!
Excellent work Mikey, your country needs you and people like you.
Nice kerbing of the alloys as he drove away added another £1000 to the bill 🤣
Much more than that; these useless "look at me" twits are all the same.
I noticed that too.
He said your jealous,what a joke he is.
Rich people never buy cars in their own personal name.
This is the probably the reason why this happened.
Jealous of what? We're all living in a country that's falling apart. There might not even be any power for him to charge his phone soon.
Don’t be silly we have enough. This is just capitalism at work, to get money from us plebs. Eventually though the rich will hoard it all, and we’ll die off.
Or for the cyclist to charge his camera.
He is driving a fast car and you on a push bike and yet you caught him up using his phone😂😂😂😂
1k fine is pointless for this muppet.
I like the term "WhatsApp gap" you see this more and more.
Fines based on a % of the value of the car might be a useful tool dealing with those that would use their wealth to evade justice
In Switzerland traffic fines are a % of one's income...
@@marinella7866 Official income is irrelevant in todays world with so many declaring zero income. Just base fines on assets.
love the narration at the end, thanks!
That's a dreadful loophole. He's a twat. You dealt with him well though. 👍
I like the way you were able to catch up with a Lambo on your bike. It shows in the city, a bike is sometimes just as fast.
i have a real problem when a company is fined but the person committing the crime gets off. people break the law and must be held accountable.
Yes, I'm not very comfortable with that either.
What kind of ridiculous loophole is that to get out of being punished with points taken off your license?
It is ridiculous, but if no-one will say who was driving, it's very difficult to actually know who should get the points. Personally I think any registered keeper who fails to nominate (or admit to being) the actual driver, should have their licence AND their car taken off them, and then have to physically watch as one is shredded and the other gets crushed into a 3' cube, respectively. After a few news stories of that nature, people might get the message.
@@eddyblackmore2834 But if the registered keeper is a company, none of that works. My theory is the guy owns his own company which itself owns the car, or leases it. So the company takes the hit and he avoids the points.
Bad driver should get more than he did,Well done Mikey keep up the great work
Why tf didn’t he get points? Is that just for poor people?
@@hanspz5505 I think likely that was a company car so they fined the company that money
That's always the smug retort of the idiot: you're just jealous. I've never driven a Lamborghini, but I did once have a ride in one and I can confirm that it was the most hideous experience I've ever had in a car. If anyone gave me that 'you're only jealous' routine, I'd tell them what for. Cheers Mikey, we appreciate all your selfless work.
Poser......I used to have a convertible but absolutely hated putting the top down. I just liked the look of the car with the canvas roof.
Just a small correction, the DVLA have a register of keepers not owners and the registration document clearly says on it that it’s not proof of ownership. The S172 of the RTA also refers to keepers and not owners.
Otherwise keep up the good work!
Haha I love that he thinks you’re jealous. Lovely stuff. Welcome to London 2022.
Could you try and contact good law project?
Obviously the law is supposed to be the same for everyone but obviously it's not as this person has evaded points and probably a massive increase on insurance by cheating the system.
The only way you can stop this is to make it not worthwhile for these companies to protect their clients. They can't identify a driver but you know damned well that they didn't rent it to someone with no ID. Super-fines required for non-compliance, and the chances of that happening with the current bunch of crooks making the laws...
@@PedroConejo1939 Get a court order, or the case into court, then it becomes contempt of court if failing to identify the law breaker. The good law project are the experts.
Great stuff! What are the straight lines on the pavement that zig zag, like along the curb?
I am more certain than not, the tint was illegal as well. That’s often a sign of someone who wishes to remain anonymous. Despite driving an overpowered banana
"You know what this is?" "Yea a camera" 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
How tall was the guy on the Cannondale beside you? That headtube was soooo long! P.S. I am jealous, both the Cannondale and your Surley/"cheap bike."
If they fail to disclose the owner of the vehicle by the time it gets to court the vehicle should be seized and storage fees accumulated until they decide to own up
the comedy of a cyclist catching up with a lambo driver is unmatched
Guessing owned by a car hire company or a lease company that offers this as a service - refuses to name you as a driver and lets you pay a fine instead.
Nice catch mikey
Very very good point about the cycling number plates
That's worth remembering next time some schlub brings it up.
Rollocks! If it works in North Korea it’s good enough us.
In various countries people recieve a percentage fine based off what they earn as opposed to just giving everyone the same fine.
It means someone earning £100,000 a year would get a fine which hurts their pocket and makes them think twice and someone who earns £20,000 a year still feels it.
As opposed to currently where it hurts people who can't afford to lose that money and just confirms to the rich that they can break the law and not feel any real impact. Why UK hasn't adopted this yet is beyond me
It is such a shame that the police cannot do more it is probably because there is too much paperwork and the courts don't hand out stronger fines but most of all keep up the good work love xxxx
Failure to nominate needs to be an immediate prosecution for the company directors
It was Your turn Mikey to say "don't you know who I am"? Hahaha
"You're just jealous of my (stupid garish yellow) toy..."
A toy whitch he doesn't own.
Imagine thinking that people would be jealous of him. I suppose you'd have to be that shallow to rent one of those in the first place.
The worst bit is he continues to fiddle with his middle region while talking… then nearly hit the kerb as he left! 🤣
£1000 not even enough for a couple of new tires on this car. Shouldn't fines be means tested and appropriate for who is paying? £1000 is lunch for some people "who probably have a great accountant so avoid paying taxes" But it could be devastating for someone else who actually does something useful for a living.
Cycling number plates is a bonkers idea.
No matter how many times I have put a number plate on the saddle of one of my bikes the result is the same, they simply will not pedal!
So I find a downhill and give 'em a little push, still no good, they just fall off.
Given up now ;-)
2:38 Did you report the cyclist in the outside lane riding one handed and hiding his phone videoing the yellow car as it drove off? 👀
report him for what exactly?
Report him for committing no offences at all?
Brain dead anti cyclist whataboutery ought to be an offence, sadly it is not!
Imagine if every employee was deducted points.Drivers will quickly be identified.
2:00 - he`s texting Lamborghini to ask why there`s no driver seatbelt fitted 🤣 Keep the good work up Mikey 👍
Standard plate = RENTAL lmao
They’ve also got to repair 2 wheels after kerbing them when he drove away. 😂😂
Sincere compliments for being faster than a Lambo in city traffic. And with less noise pollution. 😃
These videos are so funny. I know it's a serious subject. But it's funny watching these regards.
- You know what I think?
- -I DON’T CARE WHAT YOU THINK!
-You’re jealous!
Good work - Keep going Mickey.
£1000 is not enough. I believe if fines were a percentage of your earnings or in this case the companies, then people would definitely change their attitude. Have a great weekend.
in finland speeding fines are indexed to income and have been for a century.
Sometimes this leads to comical results, as when in 2015 a millionaire had to pay a fine of more than €54,000 for a speeding offense of exceeding the limit by just over 20km/h.
The absolute record is held by a motorcyclist, who had to pay €116,000 in 2002 for exceeding the speed limit by 25km/h in a city..
@@saaversteen Sounds good . Don't speed even if it's a little over . It's a limit not a target
The era of video is endlessly fascinating. For example, I watched knowing you would use your elevated perspective and capture rig to provide a very cool drone-like segment of the culprit, red-handed! The jitterbug leg action of the driver clearly displayed his discomfort- so, mission accomplished. The blatant disregard displayed, I assume because of fore-knowledge of the corporate obfuscation he had in place, was illuminating; well done, never stop!
I thought the fidgety driver was just in a hurry to go peepee
What a shame they couldn't prosecute him personally.
I’ve been saying the same things on my channel about bicycle number plates. So with number of bike thefts every day, it would be so easy to say “but i didnt know my bike was stolen”
No seatbelt either? btw, I believe this is the first time I've seen your face?. Keep up the good work.
So what would have happened if the clown driving had mowed someone down?
Massive fine. Your point about license plates is very true. You've shown it many times where companies have been able to escape a lot of punishment for the driver.
massive ? for a lambo, it's peanuts.
What does "Massive fine" mean? Do you mean "He should have had a massive fine", or "£1,000 isn't a massive fine", etc.?
0 to 12 mph in 0.5 - money well spent
Being him is probably punishiment enough
Mikey when did this go to court. When checking its reg the DVLA says it is now SORN and has no MOT details held. Other sites have it as no tax and has no MOT since 28/2/2022
I'm not exactly sure of court dates, but I think it wasn't SORNed at the time.
Did he kerb his wheels whilst pulling away from you at the end or was there a Rizzla sized gap between the kerb and wheels? If he did that would have been a more expensive mistake than the £1000 sadly.
Imagine how ignorant you have to be to think someone's jealous because they take offense to life threatening behaviour, absolutely ridiculous.
I think that the failure to identify the driver penalty should be higher, I'm not going to mention my opinion of abuse of speed roaring away. Good going, Mikey. All the best regards to you 🙏
There’s no acceleration limit 😉
Only reason I'd be in favour of bike rego's is if they are also required to have insurance. And that's the same with e-transport. I see son many people coming through hospital from being hit by scooters and the patient ends up with a huge bill.
i was shocked when i saw ur face.. thought i was watching a 25 year old East Indian Boy out doing justice!! now i understand.. 🤣😅
I wonder if the same loophole will apply when he eventually drives over a pedestrian or cyclist? If not then what's the difference?
Good catch Mikey 👍❤️🇬🇧
Sadly in the UK leople do literally get away with that.
The car is king here.
"If", he has an accident. Pedestrians are just as much in danger from cyclists.
Taking into account the vast difference in cars to bicycle ratio, range of cars etc, it's surprisingly very close.
@@ivorwindybottom7364 Considering most people are run over by cars in general and even on a pavement, more people are run over by cars than cyclists... I'd say you would be better off looking out for cars...
Your name sounds like you talk to 12 year olds on the internet
@@ivorwindybottom7364 The statistics tell a very different story, pedestrians are about 50 times more likely to be killed by motor vehicles on the pavement than by cyclists. The ratio for pedestrian fatalities generally is about 100 to 1 vehicles to cyclists. The application of a little school level Physics knowledge explains why!
Just checked the vehicle enquiry service, and it turns out that vehicle is SORN OFF ROAD.
How do you find out the outcomes of these
Might be Hertz, I think there are some luxury car rentals on / close to Edgware Road
Brother i never respected you as person until today when you said, i dont mind the noise, i like the noise. Big respect from me as a supercar driver in London. Keep up all your good work, you have no jealousy in you. God bless you, take care from me 🫡
The car at 0.43 secs looked like the driver was on the phone.
Such a shame he found the loophole to avoid the points, fines do nothing for someone with money, points do. I think he was jealous that you kept up with him on a bike :)
It's now SORN so looks like it may have had some impact.
I have a feeling the car was rented by him. Likely that money the rental company had to pay
Well they should change the law so if you fail to identify the driver and it is company owned then the director of the company should get the points.
@@LewisRawlinson30 These cars are often insured on short term polices as they are only used in season or when people are in country
Lambo's go about as fast as a pushbike round London, then.
Law doesn’t feel pity for you just because you have a $150,000 waste of trash that you drive.
“You’re just jealous” after breaking the law 3 times 🤣
I imagine people driving around in cars to the value of a 3 bed family home, aren't going to give a stuff about 'little' legal inconveniences...🤷🏼♂️
You had a great video - police should have done a visual ID and got him - keep at it Mikey
he law should change that failure to identify the driver by the registered owner of the vehicle should lead to a week in jail or a £10,000 fine.
Great work
A grand? Car worth/costs more then many of our homes. Perhaps bring in a rule for company cars....if you don't comply you get hit for a minimum 10% of value of the list price of a new model to maximum vehicle seized if its a serial law breaking vehicle ( driver). As for number plates on bikes? I don't think it'll work either, but I do think it should be law to wear a safety helmet, that goes for electric scooters too. No helmet, no using the roads/ cycle lanes. They seem to go with legislation against motor vehicles but leave other modes of transport alone
Everything you think you know about cycling helmets is wrong, btw. See my current twitter feed @mikeycycling to see a discussion on it.
2:37 - I wonder if he damaged his wheels there...
Loollll, immediately goes for the “ your jealous”
Nice one Mikey.I´m jealous that you got more hair than me.
The bike rider behind was on his phone as well. Lol.
Great work Mikey. Liking the reflections / conclusions at the end also.
You do a wonderful job. Keep it up, but perhaps you could shout at offenders such as the cyclist at 2.40 riding one-handed with his phone in front of his face. I rode round Plymouth yesterday and lost count of the one-handed or, more commonly, no-handed cyclists riding like this on the roads or in the pedestrian precint, posing a great danger to themselves and others.
95 euro spot fine if caught holding or operating phone whilst cycling in The Netherlands.
I think phone use is only illegal in motor vehicles in the UK. He’s also mentioned before about confronting 2 wheeled road users. He doesn’t confront them in case he causes them to lose balance and fall.
In the UK it is not an offence to use a mobile phone while cycling, riding with no hands is though. As for one handed, how precisely do I signal my intentions to other road users, or indeed adjust the zipper on my jacket without leaving just one hand on the handlebars?
The answer of course is that you neither know nor care, indulging in some brain dead anti cyclist whataboutery is all you are doing!
Maybe one thing should be done for hire vehicles as well as displaying registration plates, they should display a portion of the driving licence number alongside to identify the driver in case of this.