Jimmy Mulville Not So Funny Now - LJ11GJK Aston Martin Rapide
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 พ.ค. 2023
- This one was in the papers. James Mulville was convicted at City of London Magistrates court on 25/05/2023, of an endorseable mobile phone driving offence, and was given 6 penalty points on his licence, bringing his current total to 9 points. Fine was £1,000, costs of £625, and surcharge of £400. Funnily enough, I caught this exact car/plate in January 2019, and the driver then took an FPN for 6 points and £200. I will never know who that driver was, but it turns out that Jimmy Mulville was disqualified in 2020. I can't help thinking it was him I caught in 2019 also, but it may well be a different driver. There was at least one V5C logbook change according to the DVLA record.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_M...
Well, James Mulville, now you're just 3 points from another disqualification. That's a single speeding or red light jump offence, or another mobile phone offence. There are thousands of people with cameras in London, so the chances of being caught again are more substantial than many drivers imagine. I don't want you punished, I only want behaviour change and better driving from you. It seems to me that in your case even punishment is not making the necessary difference in your driving. Nevertheless, I hold out hope that you might change and improve.
I was coming back from Lavender Hill Magistrates court for this case: • "I Thought You Were Th...
On this same journey I caught two more drivers:
LV21SYJ • On The Way Back From C...
LD63ZMY • On The Way Back From C...
For whatever reason, sunny days like this seem to make for an explosion of bad driving and phone use in my experience.
=====================================================================
These are affiliate links - I earn a small amount of referral money if you click on these links and buy anything. It doesn't cost you any more, and it helps to support my road safety work.
GoPro Hero 11 Black, the latest version - amzn.to/3gqURSn
My camera: GoPro Hero 10 Black - amzn.to/3zARTPk
GoPro Hero 9 Black - amzn.to/39oZFBw
The GoPro headstrap I mount the camera to: amzn.to/2PyVrjI
A good quality MicroSD card that is fast enough for this 4K camera: amzn.to/31qhf3G
Spare GoPro Hero 9/10 original batteries - amzn.to/3CFbZtz
(clone batteries are cheaper, but perhaps less reliable)
GoPro Hero 7 battery and charger: amzn.to/3lQ4vgr
I also use:
An Insta360 Go 2 microcamera: amzn.to/3e9Jz13
An Insta360 One R 360 degree camera: amzn.to/3eaMshX
Rode Wireless Go II Dual channel wireless microphones: amzn.to/3BphpYM
If you'd like to support me by buying me a ko-fi, here's the link: ko-fi.com/cyclingmikey
=====================================================================
LJ11GJK
LJ11-GJK
LJ11 GJK
202207291125 - ยานยนต์และพาหนะ
I always love it when, in towns or cities, a bloke on a bike is just as fast if not faster than a bloke in a 190mph car.
Me too, although I also like his car. :)
What i always find amazing is the fact that those people have expensive cars but never buy a cheap bluetooth receiver or car phone holder.
I even think this car has a bluetooth radio. So what is the problem?
@@meneertjehetheertjeyou can't read or send Emails with a Bluetooth receiver. There probably that addicted to there phones, they'll be detoxing the moment they put it down.
@@coolguy1538you can technically - my old iphone will happily read out loud texts and emails and i can tell siri to reply and dictate what to say. So it is possible. Nobody should do it while driving though as it would be such a huge distraction. People should just put it on silent and sling it in the glove box then catch up when they arrive where they need to be. There is no need to communicate by phone while driving. None. Not voice, typed or dictated. Driving requires full attention.
@@coolguy1538 I mean it’s 2023 😂 you can if you know how to use android or iOS you can use the digital assistant
I wrote a whole entire essay on my iPad without touching it
I wonder how he’d feel if the next family emergency was some phone user ploughing into a family member’s car.
Yes: and I wonder if his barrister provided evidence of the emergency?
he is clearly somebody who cares about no-one, including his own family
If they made the penalty an immediate 12 month ban, the fine equal to the value of the car, and the car seized and crushed, you watch the phone use stop. The trouble, as with most crimes in the UK, is that the punishment is too lenient.
I'm with you on that. When a motorist has clocked up 12 points and is facing a ban, the courts look at the "hardship factor" as in will the person be able to get to work, elderly relatives, all the sob story stuff. Anyone with 9 points needs to take a serious look at their driving and immediate bans should be introduced. Actions have consequences.
@@geoffpoole483 The "hardship factor" isn't greeted so warmly these days. A lot of judges aren't persuaded in that regard and quite rightly take the posiion of (paraphrased) "You should have thought of all of that before you deliberately drove like a total pillock". Quite right too.
I also think that totting up should be considered over a cumulative lifetime, rather than active points. Someone can get 3 points here, 6 points there, it all expires, another 6 points, those expire, 3 points somewhere else, those expire... and it goes on forever. They're allowed to continue driving because they never hit the threshold of currently active points to trigger a ban. I think that is something worth looking at also.
@@halfbakedproductions7887 judges may be getting marginally better, but the law is still about five million times too lenient
I agree it would reduce the usage of phones but it wouldn’t stamp it out. People just don’t give a fk. And what’s on peoples phones is far more important than the collateral damage they cause when they have an accident.
A perfect example of someone who is so full of themselves because they have been on TV and has a few quid. I’m delighted that the entitled stroppy fool got found guilty (I have no idea who he is anyway😀). The arrogance of thinking that hiring a lawyer could get him off this offence when he was 100% caught with his pants down. Thank you Mikey.
Jimmy Saville also hired lawyers, didn't he?
@@Zerpentsa6598 But he had maggie thatcher refusing to hear anything bad about him aswell, plus prince charles asking him for advice on speech writing.
And Keir Starmer not prosecuting him.
I have never heard of him either.
@@terryboland3816 That’s been debunked so often even the Tories don’t bother to mention it any more😂
In 'Old Harry's Game', he played an arrogant prick who killed another driver by crashing his Porsche into him.
Ha! I did not know that.
Thomas Crimp!
The irony!
@@archivist17 That's him!
When art becomes reality
So he has been basically breaking the law for a few years, doesn’t seem to care, drives rather erratically and in an unsafe manner, can’t show his face in court but can give you the finger for addressing his unsafe driving skills. A true gentleman 😂😂😂 #jimmymulville.
Just wondering why it would make a difference whether he was using messages or email? Use of a handheld phone behind the wheel is illegal, why even deliberate such a stupid point as a defence lawyer?
I think the defence wanted to angle it that way as a plea in mitigation in that he was apparently dealing with a family emergency, if I understood correctly. Doesn't look anything like that to me.
@@CyclingMikey shocking that a barrister thought that they could argue a family emergency qualifies as the emergency use exception. Similar to the arguement the lad in his works van tried to pull a few videos back (he claimed to be responding to an emergency text from work, and was then shocked when he found out that he had
admitted guilt and that was the end of his trial).
My understanding is that the emergency use was well established as meaning use to contact the emergency services; and regardless, the wording was clear that even that would be an unacceptable excuse if it was reasonable to stop to make that contact. So IF that barrister was going to attempt to argue that there was a family emergency and it would have been unreasonable for the driver to stop in order to deal with it, he really should hang his head in shame.
@@CyclingMikey "dealing with a family emergency" That old chestnut.
@@CyclingMikey Am I correct in thinking that still isn't a valid 'get-out' for dangerous driving? Call 999 if there is an emergency. Otherwise you just add to the danger. I would suggest that, if it's something serious enough to warrant reading a text and replying while driving, it is worrying enough that it would distract you even more than the actual message. He'd be so worried about his family... And he wouldn't need to reply by text. He could call hands-free and say "message received, on my way, call 999" etc.
But it doesn't add up. Why would you delay driving home for this emergency, sitting stationary on a road, messaging, while your family was in desperate need of you? I can't see any scenario where you'd be required to solve an emergency by text and it couldn't wait. Worst case scenario - say your toddler is calling because your wife has stopped breathing - engine off, hazard lights on, get out of the car and take the call. There is no scenario where it's ok to text, veer from side-to-side, and then zoom off at speed. I'm glad they didn't accept that nonsense.
I'm also curious; if the court had entertained that defence "I was texting in an emergency", surely the defendant has to BE THERE to say that? They need to be available to be questioned about the emergency and all of the details. It just sounds like an exercise in time-wasting. Maybe they were hoping you'd be incoherent and flustered or angry. But even then your camera caught that behaviour and it was clearly not influenced by you. It's there for the court to see and there is no justification. Ramble over. Lol.
Sounds like a variant of 'The Chewbacca defense' (Southpark reference) where the defense just tries to construct something to misdirect the case.
There is absolutely no excuse to be using a handheld phone, but there is always some arrogant ,big head, who thinks the law does not apply to them. Well done Mikey 👍 another one bites the dust😂
He's been done twice now
I'm pretty sure you can sync your phone with the car especially a poxy Aston Martin and if you can't why not Aston Martin?
I never heard of the guy. He’s now best known as the TV boss who swore at cyclist as he used a phone in his Aston Martin, while speeding away in slow traffic.
I've no idea who he is either, but he doesn't seem a pleasant chap.
Down with this sort of thing
He was funny I the 1980s
I remember him from the show "Who Dares Wins..." He's a very funny comedian in front of the camera.
@@DoctorX2 Rory McGrath disagrees
Thanks Mikey. And it's important to reinforce that it's not a victory, it's tragic that the behaviour takes place. I hope Mr Mulville will now change his behaviour.
I'm pretty sure if my Kia has built in hands free, his Aston Martin will have.
Yep, I had a 2011 Renault Kangoo that had hands-free. No way that thing doesn't.
Odd he hasn't learnt from the previous times he was caught. Next time we might see the barrister argue deminished responsibility but not sure if being a slow learner is a valud excuse?
Kia -v - Aston Martin 😂😂 🔥🔥
From comedy to personal courtroom drama. A creative career can take many paths!
So often the case with Slebs.
I was wondering seeing that it was his second offence for using a mobile device whilst in control of a vehicle. How much was he fined ? Seeing how he was making a habit of doing so
Not a great comedian either not in ricky Gervais level or Peter Kay
@mrichards55 Looks like something out of the game The Sims 4 😀
Thank you Mikey - you spend a lot of your time in court making sure these dreadful drivers are dealt with. Much appreciated from those of us who value safety.
He does a valuable job; however, I suspect that 400 years ago he would have been out daily looking for witches.
@@yacsem that's because you're a nincompoop.
Well said brother, well said.
He's just an arrogant SOAB - if he had already been recently banned and then couldn't be bothered to learn and get a mount after that he clearly just doesn't care.
The higher power the car, more chance of a accident when not paying attention, the most important thing is not what you drive but how you behave when driving.
Always doing a good job, well done Mickey 👍
I never understand why such cars are even allowed on the roads. I believe engine power should be restricted for public roads.
@Ngamer834
The higher the price of a vehicle the more monies goes to the government, in more ways than one. The bigger the litre The better
@@Ngamer834 An Aston Martin would be great to drive on a motorway but not in London.
@@andymcnab2.0 Better for the environment? More money for the Government to squander...
@@Ngamer834yep such a powerful car was the real issue here a traffic jam 🙄
If one person on a bicycle can catch this many idiots, imagine if we had a group of people doing it, perhaps in some sort of uniform…..we could call them police 🤔
There's only one thing worse for a celebrity than being caught out - not being recognised.
Keep up the good work Mikey, but be careful about someone wantng revenge!
His insurance will now cost more than my car!
There's a chance it won't... He may self insure.
@@damionlee7658 It will still cost him a lot of money. The deposited amount to self-insure is now £500,000. What would be the compound interest on that over, say, 10 years?
He has more than plenty.
@@damionlee7658i don't think thats legal on UK roads?
@@chrispop99 @Damion Lee
You can't self-insure, not for £500K or at all. That option was removed by The Motor Vehicles (Compulsory Insurance) (Miscellaneous Amendments) Regulations 2019. Since then, third party insurance has been compulsory.
I read he got a 1k fine, 625 costs, 400 court costs and 6pts. Good job.
Makes his money slagging off the establishment then becomes the entitled establishment he vilified. Hypocrite.
Who does, the bellend in the jaaaaag
Poor driving throughout from him, likes his speeding as well
This would make a great story for 'Have I got news for you'.
"My client was using his phone whilst driving BUT your honour was only using it repeatedly for messaging purely because he was driving an expensive car AND he was NOT using his email....."
That's one hell of a defense team isnt it?
Whats next..." he only stabbed her to death with a knife your honour because he has 3 Mercedes' and his chosen murder weapon of a massive pair of scissors were in the other room..."
Mikey, when they all ask whether you targeted the expensive car, or whether you are a vigilante or whether this or that, what is their point they're trying to make? If you did target expensive cars, or celebrities and you were some dude trying to get people in trouble, it doesn't change the crime so what are they trying to achieve?
I thought this. He couldn't even argue that he was being pursued and that caused his driving to be that way.
@@JHJHJHJHJH ah is that something they try? I guess it could potentially defend the "driving badly after being caught" but the mobile offence is the instant fine, yeah I really don't know why they try. Mikey isn't famous so it's not exactly ruining his character
Is it something like a bias? Maybe ?? I dunno but I thought the same. Crime is crime wether you actively go out to catch a set person committing or just happen across it.
Mikey is a very level headed guy straight and fair wish more people were like him it would be a safer world stay safe my friend
Well done Mikey. His name didn't ring any bells and then I did a you tube search. This video is his most viewed ever, and he only get's a mention for being a crap driver. His interview video has less views than an old video of my dog that I recorded with a Nokia.
😆
and it was of the dogs a**e
Lol
Looks like I've been hacked. I didn't write this comment.
What a pain our legal system is that you have to waste your time in court addressing this. An unsettling (and unsurprising) that the press would try to get you doing a thumbs up
To be fair, everyone should be entitled to defend themselves. I think this was a singularly pointless defence, but if you take away that right, it affects us all negatively. Shortest deliberation I've ever seen by magistrates.
Waste of resources. Anybody, with 6 mins training could tell he was guilty. They sure know how to waste tax here.
@@andrewnorris5415 The person wasting taxes was the defendant who chose to plead not guilty, and then didn't even have the balls to turn up.
Phone use, swerving, excessive acceleration/speed - a Hat Trick
Some people don't deserve nice things like that Aston Martin, money can't buy class
Buys plenty of Cocaine tho in his case i reckon!
How can famous people just not show up? Isn't justice meant to be seen to be done?
Nobody has to turn up , famous or not. As long as their legal representative does its all good.
The weird thing is, the guy wanted to take it to court. He could have just taken the initial points and fine. I suspect the fine is higher if it goes to court and you're found guilty. Going to court is not a punishment so justice was done in that he was fined and given points.
Sadly he didn’t learn his last 6 points loss so thoroughly deserved to get caught again. I doubt it will hurt him financially but the insurance for that motor will see an increase. Well done as usual, great work.
You see
when you pull these drivers up for being stupid but because you haven't got a badge of authority on you are then spoke to like a piece of s***
but if it was a copper it would be a different story
keep up the good work Mikey . I pulled a driver up once before for talking on his mobile phone while driving and I got foul abuse of him what the hell has it got to do with you . I said lucky it wasn't my brother who is a police officer
Because they think they are entitled! Such unintelligent people who can’t fix hands free up on their cars when any 12yr old could sort it for them.
Well done Mikey, doing a great job!!
Good work Mickey. Stay safe👍🏻🏴
Well done sir. Personally if I lived in London i just wouldn't see the point in having a car like that. The bike seems equally as fast in most areas.
It sure is
Although that has as much to do with the excess of cars on the road and poor quality of the public transport as it does the efficiency of cycling
In central London an ebike is probably the fastest method of transport because you can thread through gaps even motorcycles and scooters can't. Thank goodness I don't live in London though.
“This was entirely out of character for him”, said Mr Thomas defending. 🤣 Sure it was, he only got caught twice by one man! You couldn't make it up!
Very nicely documented case.
Fully noted that you only Target 🎯 the behaviour as opposed to a specific individual.
Great job! Thanks for watching out!
Revving the engine behind you and trying to intimidate you is disgraceful behaviour. His sense of entitlement when his barrister suggested that you targeted him because he was driving an Aston Martin! As a pedestrian in Hong Kong I agree that stationary drivers are not fully aware of their surroundings, even when a pedestrian is on a crossing. Mikey we need you in Hong Kong:)
Looks like he never learns
See you in 2025 for you next CyclingMikey shaming
PUT THE PHONE DOWN JIMMY, SET THE EXAMPLE !
He was for the most part, driving like a di€k. I was waiting to spot the flashy car as you rode along. As soon as the Aston came into shot, boom… it was obvious it would be that car. Since watching your videos I have also noticed the same thing, the flashy cars are defiantly more likely to be the ones on their phones
I realised in my 40's that i couldnt do better. My concentration was bad. I was easily distracted. I had tired of driving and the rules of the road. I sold my car and havent driven since. I walk or use trains. Saved lotsa money and i'm saving the planet now too. 😊
Sadly people with that level of maturity and introspection are very rare
well done on helping to keep people safer
I truly appreciate your work. Please keep roads safe for all of us
You look exactly how I expected.
“A totterupper” 😂 I like that
Keep up the fantastic and honest work Mikey. It's about making the roads safe, and not necessarily shaming anyone like how the reporters wanted your thumbs up picture so they could run a story on the guilty celebrity. You're a class act Mikey!
WELL DONE! Good for you, you might well have saved someone from harm when exposing a clearly dangerous driver!
Most of the drivers you catch are not displaying especially poor driving - other than illegally using the phone of course - but his driving was clearly noticeable, even at the low speeds of the traffic. Good catch.
Most drivers caught drunk-driving aren't a second away from ploughing into a pedestrian. But it's best to catch them doing the thing that causes the bad stuff *before* they do the bad stuff. People using phones aren't aware and are driving poorly by definition. Swerving all over the road is an extreme example but many of the people in these videos are completely oblivious that Mikey is even there. A lack of awareness, 100% distraction interspersed with small bursts of movement without checking their surroundings - that's dangerous, poor driving.
@@JHJHJHJHJH I'm not criticising Mikey or defending illegally using a phone in stationary traffic - just pointing out that this bloke is a perfect demonstration of how, even in slow traffic, it's a stupid and potentially dangerous thing to do.
@@PedroConejo1939 I suspect JH only read your first few words before the Pavlovian urge kicked in!
But you're both on the same page, so it's all good! 😄
@@cargy930 Yeah. It happens. I'm always misunderstanding what people wrote. Dammit, I can't even understand what I write sometimes.
Well done for the no thumbs up. well done for the work you do.
3 points now another 6 points so presumably a Hat-Trick will mean a ban?
(Cough)
Clearly this driver intends to keep using a hand-held device behind the wheel.
Keep up the good work Mikey!
Great work Mikey i had a very good laugh at him so he must be funny .......
These fines are just a little extra tax to these people. They don't care.
Good work, Mikey. Your tenacity is inspirational.
Laws are for plebs like us, not mega stars like him don't you know this? Great work Mikey thanks again.
The way he pulled off was like -Hey look at me in my fancy car- and thanks to you mikey everyone got to see it.😂
Does seem dangerous having a powerful car accelerating like that, after not paying attention to the road. For someone that had been banned and then got more points, I wonder what it would take for them to get it? Maybe the press attention will make it sink in that doing this isn't a good idea?
People don’t really have an argument in regards to stationary drivers using phones. A line needs to be drawn somewhere so that the law is 100% clear to everybody.
If it was Ok to use a phone in stationary traffic, they would then say “well it’s ok to use it and edge forward….it’s ok to use it if moving slowly” and it would keep going like that etc.
Clearly this first ban did nothing to change his behaviour so what the justice system thinks some extra points on his licence will do now is anyone's guess. Being caught for the same offence so soon after the first ban should be an instant second ban, but significantly longer.
Also a disgrace he didn't turn up himself. Shouldn't be allowed to get away with that either. Thinks his time is more valuable than everyone else's.
What a horrible person all round.
No loophole to get you off. Well caught
Funnily enough his barrister was from Freeman & Co, aka Mr Loophole. Fail. It was an unwinnable case IMO, from their perspective.
Ive added his driving offenses to his Wikipedia page. The page mostly reads like its been written by his PR people. Hopefully all the bad publicity will make him think twice about his poor driving
6:15 oh, he's someone famous in the uk? I've never heard of him. Good work, sir!
Isn't it amazing how when someone is caught breaking the law using a mobile phone they they show utter contempt.
He should have been given another three points for the finger gesture.
Something tells me that this won't stop him. He doesn't care about the law or people's safety.
I know who Jimmy Mulville is. He was a tv comic and then a successful producer. All very good stuff, too. Disappointed to see how he is in real life.
It makes laugh, all these modern cars isn't hands free.
What Don's they are.
Well done Mikey..
I was just on the way to collect my hands-free kit, but now I cannot afford it, m'lud.
More power to your elbow, Mikey.
For those that don't know Jimmy Mulvile, he's friends with Ronnie Pickering
Call Graham Linehan as a character witness...
Looked like a hat trick of offences. Why do so many people in big/flash cars come across as entitled. Looks so much more better when they are driven properly.
You are keeping our roads a safer place. Thank you
Being stationary in traffic is not a good excuse to use your phone. Today, on a main road in traffic there was a guy on his phone in traffic. His concentration was such that he rolled about 2 metres before he realised. Luckily he didn’t make contact with the car behind.
My mum taught him in Liverpool …. The way he’s dealt with Father Ted is not so good 😢
he has changed a lot from when he was singing in the communards
Good catch, Mikey. And good call moving over later. I wouldn't want to be on a road with him. That initial move would have taken you out if you'd been on his left and then taken out a motorbike passing on the right as he corrected at speed. I'm glad he received some consequences, and I feel you're right that the publicity might finally start to give the guy a message.
I've seen things in the press lately where people are complaining that other people's behaviour has caused damage to their reputation... As if the person who reported a crime or deception was at fault, rather than the criminal/liar. If showing the truth of how someone behaves causes others to have a bad opinion of them, the behaviour was wrong, not the reporting of the behaviour. Some people just refuse to take responsibility for their own behaviour or the consequences of it. This sort of result goes some way to fixing that as it's the only language some people understand.
Thanks, Mikey.
Never heard of him. Glad he got what he deserved. You might see him on a bike now Mikey 😂😂😂😂
A lot, not all, but, a lot of these people think that they can "wealth" themselves above the law!
The very fact that you can see them, turn around, look in their window and them being completely unaware shows how distracted driver are when on the phone.
You may not feel good about it but I do! Keep up the great work......
When Jimmy Mulville told everyone he was going to be a comedian as a child they laughed at him.
Well they're not laughing now.
😆 ,,,class
Good. Some people never learn - and if that’s the case they should be banned from driving. Keep up the brave work
True definition of impartially. And I have to say,him giving the “finger” really tells you a lot about the kind of guy he is. Hope I never have the opportunity to work with him.
Another arrogant figure from the TV industry who thinks his money can get him off the hook. It's disgusting, really, that his barrister tried to discredit you and obviously felt this would hold sway with the magistrates. Even if you had recognised him, or even "targeted" him, so what? Your motives are irrelevant to the offence that he'd already committed.
I think he was on "who's line is it anyway" or something like that and is now worth millions.
Success (Depending on how you define it) + money = arrogance. What a surprise. Pleased you caught him.
If he'd been disqualified recently it obviously shows an incredibly poor attitude to driving to get caught for the same thing again so soon after a disqualification had ended. Repeat offences like this really need to come with another longer disqualification before someone gets hurt.
I wish the police cared as much as you do!
They received the evidence, processed it and prosecuted the case, so it seems they do care.
@@JHJHJHJHJH you're too charitable to them. Plenty of us have had clear-cut cases ignored or dismissed by lazy coppers to know the score. It's a job for them, they don't care and they don't have to care. Actually they don't even have to do a GOOD job.
Another great catch. Well done mate
Looking well and good sir! Great job done as always. Love the videos. Offending seems to be on the increase where I live. Young woman was recently killed at a stop light when hit from behind by a distracted driver. 😢
keep up the good work all equal before the law alledgedly
Its clearly ingrained behaviour by the chap in question... the speeding is also a big issue with guy... borderling dangerous driving given the time of day...... he'll end up killing someone before he learns the lesson.
I think Mikey should be on an honours list soon.
👍🏽
The state of the car says it all about his mind
And there is no way that he was driving at 20 mph in between stops. At one point he got way ahead before Mikey caught up.
He thinks the law doesn't apply to him.
He will never learn should have got a speeding ticket as well
Thanks mikey keep safe
I'm a cyclist and a motorcyclist..........idiot drivers using their phones are a major problem.......the penalties are too soft.......1st offences need to include a 28 day impound of the vehicle in question.....irrespective of who owns or leases it........keep up the good work mate.
You're more of a celebrity than he he is - his friends are probably fed with him going on about it. ;)
Great work Mikey
Let us hope that Jimmy Mulville is close to losing his licence again, because it is obvious he has no regards for the law nor his road safety when driving. If you’re going to use your mobile phone, park up, not in traffic. Drivers have got to accept this and you can see that JM was not in safe control of his vehicle!!! Well done Mikey 👍👍👍
He has 9 points, so one more offence and he'll lose his licence again. You would imagine that that would be enough to inspire someone to drive more carefully. That's supposed to be the point.
We love you, Mikey, from SC, USA!!! Keep up tour wonderful passion! You are making a difference ❤
This case clearly shows the hazards of stationary phone use.
Moreover, I think the pass at about 4:55 was a bit too close, what do you think?
At least it looks like that on camera...
Yeah, it was a bit close, but I expected it and held left. It's a location I'm expecting such driving and it wasn't quite reportable. If the lane was a fraction narrower, I'd have held the lane through the junction and prevented it.