Bishop Robert Barron: 2022 Cardinal O'Connor Conference Keynote Adress
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 22 ม.ค. 2022
- The Cardinal O'Connor Conference on Life is the largest student-run pro-life conference in the US. Each year, the Cardinal O’Connor Conference on Life strives to promote intellectually rigorous discourse on the sanctity of human life as well as build a culture of life both within and beyond the Georgetown community. www.oconnorconference.com/
The 2022 Conference Keynote Address was given by Bishop Robert Barron, founder of Word on Fire Catholic Ministries and Auxiliary Bishop of the Archdiocese of Los Angeles. He is also the host of CATHOLICISM, a groundbreaking, award-winning documentary about the Catholic Faith, which aired on PBS.
Bishop Barron is a #1 Amazon bestselling author and has published numerous books, essays, and articles on theology and the spiritual life. He is a religion correspondent for NBC and has also appeared on FOX News, CNN, and EWTN. Bishop Barron’s website, WordOnFire.org, reaches millions of people each year, and he is one of the world’s most followed Catholics on social media. His regular TH-cam videos have been viewed over 50 million times and he has over 3 million followers on Facebook.
Bishop Barron has been invited to speak about religion at the headquarters of Facebook, Google, and Amazon. He has keynoted many conferences and events all over the world, including the World Youth Day in Kraków and the World Meeting of Families in Philadelphia, which marked Pope Francis’ historic visit to the United States.
He has shared dialogue with Dr. Jordan Peterson, Dave Rubin, Ben Shapiro, and William Lane Craig, among other influencers and thought leaders.Bishop Barron’s recent film series, CATHOLICISM: The Pivotal Players, has been syndicated for national television and nominated for an Emmy award.
May The Holy Spirit convict our hearts and lead us in the fight against the horrors of abortion. The you Bishop Barron. God bless you and your ministry always 🙏.
Wow Bishop Barron really nailed it on this one.
Thank you Bishop Baron for your very enlightening talk. God bless!
Thank you Bishop Barron.
Words fail me. This address should be printed in our leading publications. Bishop Barron, thank you for your courage and inspired rhetoric,
bearing difficult truths with grace. 🙏
to user-pc8..., it is "prudence ... setting rule and measure" (Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1806) for "courage and inspired rhetoric" that bears "difficult truths with grace".
Bishop Barron lacked exercise of "prudence" in allowing himself to be groomed by diseased family member 'familyists' with the occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate, non-economic, false status inducement that consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ is a "higher way of love" (Bishop Barron, interview by Lex Fridman, mid-2022, "Christianity and the Catholic Church" at time c.46:35) than consecrated male female marriage vowed to God for economic advantage of these groomers' families by tax-exemption embezzlement and lower insurance costs by fraud.
Thank you for your amazing talk. It is so logical and truthful in the world that is surrounded by relativism.
Education! as acquired and strived-for.
"as the sense of God is lost, so the sense of objective moral value is lost." A powerful statement that captures the root of so much of what is currently going wrong in the United States.
to derweb1972, Bishop Barron as not consecrated as joined in a celibate vowed to man in Christ or male female vowed to God marriage does not, as he cannot, keep or allow in uncertainty of belief the inseparability and qualitative equality of the objective value of doing role and the subjective value of identity being.
Bishop Barron you are a voice of truth...thank you
Brandon, if you purport to know in stating "you are" that "Bishop Barron is "a voice of truth", you are a groomed victim of diseased family member 'familyists' with Bishop Barron of purporting presuming consecrated celibate marriage is a "higher way of love" (Bishop Barron) than consecrated male female marriage.
No, he is not admirable in any way. His personal life could be called a sewer.
He is an active homosexual and lives with a bunch of other bodybuilders. He was defrauded the government regarding pandemic funds being distributed to small businesses.
@@maryshanley329 Did you mean: "...has defrauded ..." or "was defrauded by ..."?
@@oliverclark5604 Sorry.
Has.
My Mom DELIGHTED in it.
Nothing pains my heart more than the killing of a innocent child in the Womb, I love your address Bishop Barron, and all your youtube videos that you do, thanks for doing them and also this one.
Wayne Simpson, what grieves me infinitely more is the killing by "spiritual death" (Catechism of the Catholic Church, n. 2284) such as is at risk Bishop Barron in his complicity in been groomed by diseased family member 'familyists' with an inducement that consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ is a "higher way of love" (Bishop Barron) than consecrated male female marriage vowed to God.
Thanks you for speaking God's truth. May we have ears to hear it and a heart with the love of our Creator 🙏
Lily, do you have the "eyes to see" Bishop Barron's objectively utilitarian ethical selectivity on abortion and roman catholic role group clerical sexual abuse?
Selah
th-cam.com/video/FJb1x3BoOvY/w-d-xo.html
to Lily Feagin, I believe, in uncertainty, that Bishop Barron lacks both the conceptions and capabilities to keep or allow the inseparability of "ears" (that is, of the "mind" as in NIV Acts 4:32 or of the "soul" as in the RSV) and "heart" (Acts 4:32).
This is because he has allowed himself to be groomed with the occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate, non-economic, false status inducement of consecrated celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ being "a higher way of love" (his interview by Lex Fridman in mid-2022, "Christianity and the Catholic Church". TH-cam podcast time c.46:35) or "higher vocation" than consecrated male female marriage vowed to God for economic advantage of the families of these groomers as diseased family member 'familyists' by tax exemption embezzlement and lower insurance costs by fraud.
Thank you!
th-cam.com/video/FJb1x3BoOvY/w-d-xo.html
You are a beloved treasure.
Thank you for assembling this comprehensive setting of the how and why of abortion in America, the Land of the Free.
Peace.
Barbara
WOF Institute
Pittsburgh 40 Days for Life/365
Bishop Barron's thinking and having faith are I believe in uncertainty at odds by his free association with the roman catholic role groups who represent a valid and proper vow to Man in Christ by consecrated celibates and a vow to God by male-female couples in valid and proper marriage as that of these consecrated celibates as "higher vocation" (TTMHS, PCF, 1995, 35; cf. SV, 1954, 24; Vat 2: OT, 1965, 10; FC, 1981, 16) compared with male-female couple marriage hence cannot have their inseparability and qualitative equality kept or allowed by consecrated celibates as belief in uncertainty. The remedy is more valid and proper members of families of valid and proper marriages in the "worldwide catastrophe" (Pope Francis, letter to Cardinal Reinhard Marx released 10 June 2021) caused by that "the great majority of marriages are invalid" (Pope Francis, 2015).
Does "WOF Institute" listen to Pope Francis, say, starting with his reference to "entrust" in his homily a few days after his election on the Sunday Mass for the Feast of St Joseph, 19 March 2013 and then repeated affirmations that custody of vulnerable persons, children and adults, is entrusted to their families, not to "those others ...[by] parents" (Vatican Council 2: "Declaration on Christian Education", GE, 1965, 3)?
Oliver Clark, for the family member trustees in their identities in need of union of the Job's Trust Disability Trust, Brisbane, Australia keeping unity with me in my role as an anglo-catholic accredited catechist of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Brisbane procreation gift helper of families within the family role group, Australia: oliver_clark5@telstra.com
God bless you, Mr. Clark.
WOF shares beauty. They put it where ordinary people can find it.
40 Days for Life shares beauty and puts it where ordinary people can find it.
Your comment is passionate and detailed, always a good thing..
A useful next step for you could be your showing up on the sidewalk of a nearby 40 Days for Life campaign.
The spring campaign is under way.
Let God put you on the rock you cannot reach!
Peace,
Barbara
@@barbaralewis6766 God bless you, Mrs/Miss Lewis.
WOF I believe in uncertainty shares beauty of reasoned thinking out of balance with having faith.
I already did more than show up on the sidewalk outside of a Melbourne, Australia abortion clinic but entered and sat across the internal steps to be able to encourage persons seeking an abortion to not do so.
My wife and I took a young pregnant woman without other support into our home.
I prudently considered the roman catholic role groups' Catechism of the Catholic Church on "Scandal", n.2284 about the person who gives "grave ... scandal" "may even draw his brother into spiritual death" and especially n.2285 about "a great millstone" and "those who by nature or office are obliged to teach and educate others." and "wolves in sheep's clothing".
As an anglo-catholic accredited in the Catholic Archdiocese of Brisbane, Australia catechist of roman catholic role group religion, I obeyed written direction I had sought in writing of of my roman catholic role group superiors on the issue I raised of abuse of roman catholic discipline on reception by non-roman catholics, who included me, of roman catholic eucharist as "my body is food indeed" and "my blood is drink indeed" (RSV John 6:55).
I concluded, as directed by my roman catholic role group superior in writing: "... it is your own responsibility to now reach your own conclusions", that the roman catholic role group was drawing my "brother into spiritual death" whereas abortion only kills the body.
On this priority, I visited the Pope's Vatican role group departments (Bookshop, Councils, Congregations and Rota Tribunal) on five occasions from 1977-2008.
It became clear to me from the responses or advices of these departments, including in a book from the Vatican bookshop) that the great majority of these roman catholic role group personnel had been successfully groomed by diseased familyist family persons with a hidden, as occult, incest connected, as substitute mate, largely non-economic status inducement of "higher vocation" of consecrated celibacy to marriage for tax and insurance advantages of the families of these familyist groomers. This was "grave ... scandal" (CCC, n.2285). I then realised that the evil of abortion could not be treated by these roman catholic role groups until they were freed from the harm done by this grave scandal that was clearly a major contributor to the "worldwide catastrophe" of tax embezzlement and insurance fraud that from his election in March 2013 Pope France in his actions and reported statements and de facto change to canon law was addressing.
I do not see Word on Fire giving explicit support to Pope Francis in this work, instead I see WOF diverting from the priority of risk of "spiritual death" (CCC 2284) and particularly by Bishop Barron's imbalance not keeping inseparability and qualitative equality, as Pope Francis does keep, of helpers of the family procreation thinking gift role within the family and family member marriages having faith in meeting of their identities need of union.
@@oliverclark5604 Mr. Clark, you are God’s treasure. Conversation with you is one of God’s favorite things. You write like a man who already knows that. Thank you. Peace.
Youre being charitable as you should.
Right conscience beautifully explained.
to Mr Jorge mpp, "Right conscience" keeps or allows inseparability and qualitative quality of the subjective 'be-ing' and the objective 'do-ing' for which Bishop Barron as not joined in a consecrated marriage either male female vowed to God or celibate vowed to man in Christ lacks both conceptions and capabilities, instead allowing himself to be groomed by diseased family member 'familyists' with an occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate, non-economic status inducement of "a higher way of love" (Bishop Barron, interview with Lex Fridman, mid-2022, "Christianity and the Catholic Church, TH-cam podcast time c.46.35) of consecrated celibate marriage to consecrated male female marriage for economic advantage of the families of these groomers by tax-exemption embezzlement and lower insurance costs by fraud.
Thank you Bishop Barron for speaking so eloquently on how we got here, why it is so clearly a tragedy for our society, and what we all can do to create a culture of life. Let me also add that in addition to prayer, argument and more visceral education, whatever can be done to change the desperate situations many women find themselves in, which then drive them to make these tragic decisions, can only help.
I heard the call to action at the conclusion.
Thanks Bishop!
Some things " work" better than others.
Amen
Thank you, Your Eminence, for speaking about abortion!
A catholic Church Bishop is addressed formally as My Lord. A Cardinal is addressed as Your Eminence
th-cam.com/video/rByyjlgFwqo/w-d-xo.html
@@oliverclark5604 Or Your Excellency, or Your Grace: th-cam.com/video/rByyjlgFwqo/w-d-xo.html
@@oliverclark5604 I only have one Lord and is no one other than the Lord Jesus Christ ; to address a bishop as my lord is wrong and should be dropped.
I heard a priest once call a bishop as my lord and I nearly fell of my chair with shock that any christian would dare to take that title .
@@peterj6740
Peter J., Our human "Lordship" over creation by love given by God has a geometric progression of keeping or allowing covenant, non-presumed reciprocity of do-ing role and status be-ing identity; that is, inseparability and qualitative equality, as at the multiplication of the loaves and fishes reported at John 6:11-13.
Bishop Barron purports in public address to support pro-life but in practice associates with an anti-life denial of "qualitative equality" of marriage in Christ of consecrated celibates and marriage in God of male-female couples with their valid and proper children.
This inequality is evident from St Paul in 1 Cor 7:25-34, through the C16th AD "Spiritual Exercises of St Ignatius of Loyola", n.356 up to Pope Pius X11 in SV, 1954, 24; Vatican Council 2: OT, 1965, 10: "greater excellence" and GE, 1965, 3: "parents entrust" and Pope St John Paul 11 in FC, 1981, 16: "superiority" and his Council for the Family teaching document: TTMHS, 1995, 35: "higher vocation", echoed in his successor, Pope Benedict XV1s evasions of its long-term consequences by asserting "recently" on 3 February 2011 in his Introduction to the Youth Catechism of the Catholic Church released by Vatican Radio.
How does Pope Francis correct this error continuous in the roman catholic role group since St Paul?
This "How ...?" is evident in Pope Francis' first Sunday Mass homily after his election for the Feast of helper of the holy family, St Joseph, on 19 March 2013 and continually subsequentially on "custody" entrusted by the helpers to the family up to 10 June 2021 when authorising simultaneously qualitatively equal applications by his Vatican State Secretariat of State in criminal inditements of Cardinal Angelo Becciu and nine others and a diplomatic protest note to the Italian State.
Pope Francis has authorised with 100% accuracy since simultaneous (cf. Higgs Boson sub-atomic particle discovery, 4 July 2012) applications of observation measurement terms of embezzlement of helpers of the family charity donations (cf. "loaves and fishes" in John 6) and fraud on religious liberty of valid and proper family members of valid and proper marriages ("multiply, and fill the earth" in Genesis 1:28) whether in Christ (consecrated celibates) or in God (male-female couples).
Peter J, Are you watching this case so relevant to your objection to status titles for roman catholic role group officials? (see recent report by "Crux" and other Vatican news outlets)
Mu mother said that about the Sistine Chapel. ( Amazing she was so UNimpressed)
Back to the TEN COMMANDMENTS.
Justification for POLITICAL action as to ANY argument.
Hallelujah! Thanks be to God Almighty manifested in three persons, He is everything to us!!!
Thank you Bishop Barron for your words, analysis, ministry! May the Heavens hear you!
While attending College generally called Cégep at Montréal Canada and that is years back, I personally think that I flunked one of my Philosophy classes because my view point on Nietzsche was too religiously defined, sigh 😔. Despite this unfortunate situation, I never stopped believing in God and in his magnificence. My heart and soul will always be amazed before my Almighty God and therefore always desirous of his words, presence and the fulfilment of his will.
Whether at Church, home, or in my car, I usually pray in a confined place with in mind worries, needs, petitions and also thanksgivings but yesterday I prayed while taking a walk in my neighborhood looking up at the sun, sky, trees and suddenly my prayer took a turn; I felt something powerful! Certainly, I was no longer praying my usual way, meaning from my usual formula, but I was praying outward - linking my prayers to the infinite, to the absolute, to the Supreme Good that God is and I felt part of something magnificent; I said to myself as I am stepping the ground and thinking : if I was on the opposite side of the world, I would be upside down right now and yet, would not fall into space! My Hope I find it in Him our Creator God and I wish for you too to find your Hope in Him : the God of Israel who manifested Himself in three persons as Father, Son, and Holy Spirit 🙏.
Who groomed Nietzsche as also psychiatrically and/or emotionally vulnerable family members for tax and insurance advantages with a "will to power" inducement of "higher vocation" of consecrated celibacy to marriage?
Further, who groomed Pope St Paul V1 not to include "qualitatively equal" with "inseparable" of "union and procreation" in marriage? How and when did Pope Francis add "qualitatively equal"? What is Bishop Barron evading? I was with Elizabeth Anscombe (my childhood Clark family neighbour in the 1950's in Oxford UK) at the 10th Anniversary of HV Conference in Melbourne in 1979. She asked my prayer for her son, John, my childhood playmate who had defected from catholic role group belief. Why was Anscombe with so many other good ethicists unable to 'bite the bullet' on "higher vocation" of consecrated celibacy to marriage? Why did Anscombe with her coining and explaining the term "consequentialism" not take a step further to consider "duopsony" coined and explained in the early 1930's by her Cambridge University colleague, Marxist economist, Joan Robinson?
Bishop Barron, please clarify this "manifested Himself in three persons ..."
@@oliverclark5604, your writings are mostly jargon to me but at this question you've asked Bishop Barron, I would say to you not only to open your eyes to see but to open as well your ears to hear, to open your mind to comprehend, and last but not least to open your heart to let the Grace and power of God Almighty flow through and out of you. Once you are willing to do that, then the manifestation of God in three persons will be clarify to you.
@@Bamboula016 Anonymous you do not open your identity nor your role for others to see.
agreed.
And to his very SELF
And we both knew it.
Talking people into a particular viewpoint.
Where. You. Going? 🛐🗽🇺🇸🙏🏼👍
100% Bishop. May we not be privately opposed but absolutely real both private and public. If we can't give the very least respect to life at the beginning than how can we expect or claim a right at all? Every time we erode another person no matter their 'age' we in fact erode ourselves too. If a single person is disposable and it's okay....then there is no logical point feeling chilled at nazi camps. Thank God for loving us so much!
That's NAKED " killing."
Bishop Barron’s thoughts on Cardinal Hollerich’s pronouncement on homosexuality, the Pope’s invitation of non-Catholics to his synod on synodality, and the motu proprio Traditonis Custodes?
@MichaelKnowles Not sure if youve watch this keynote but it brings to light many points you were trying to articulate over the noise of the other guests on the whatever podcast, just some more fuel for you and your team in articulating the Truth everyone you are also reaching needs to hear
But i knew it first. As usual; i knew he never would.
Which IMPLODES necessarily as any political philosophy.
Kennedy speech in Texas. Pre-elec
Sounds like Cardinal McCarick to John-Paul II.
Authoritative reference?
Aristotle's POLITICAL ANIMAL
Based
'Biased'?
Prints!
Kennedy; in the First instance. Yes.
Or prints?
Cardinal Richilieu?
Did MARIO seek out assistance in his "anguish?"
Father Hesburgh(?)
WHY , did he say that?
Leading down the road to nowhere
"A politician's right to beca polemicist/rhetorician (?)
The UBER-mensch > ELIT'E ( who refers to what " object-subject". )
WHOM knows what " it" is ?
"scandal" (CCC 2284) clerical sexual abuse "spiritual death" - abortion physical death. "reference point, through both advice and example" (TTMHS, PCF, 110).
THATS who's left.
Changed-times?
"anguish"= " conscience". ??
He didnt like me : I didnt like him.
Does the general public know why the church is opposed to abortion?
Dear Bishop God Bless you
Is there no mercy for a woman who had 6 Abortions during her darkness years. The woman suffers from Mental Illness. She has cried for 50 yrs. Asking God every day for Mercy and Forgiveness. Will you not talk about the women who are suffering this Sin😥
What about capital punishment? I am pro-life. I am against it. Should everyone who supports it be voted out of office?
Maxmillion Kolbe?!
WAR = POLITICS by other means.
how would you defend the Pope's solution of the state legislating homosexuality as being ok whilst its still a sin?
ive never seen a man for all seasons
NOT-the-conscience?
Vito Corleone
I think Thomas Jefferson is a Freemason and got that principle from Freemasonry. It’s time I guess to revisit our evaluation of Freemasonry.
MY MOM' S VIEW.
A conscious REJECTION of the ALL-MIGHTY.
Or "A CON-science" ?
Priests and saints with sad faces pile up, perform miracles, cast out demons. But Jesus said, The tree is known by its fruit.
THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO MATTHEW
7: 21-23:
21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and did many miracles in your name?' 23 Then will I tell them plainly that I did not know you at all. Come to me, you workers of iniquity.
Matthew 7: 15-20
15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 By their fruits ye shall know them. Do they gather grapes from thorns or figs from thistles? 17 So every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; and an evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Ye shall know them by their fruits.
A. LETTER TO TIMOTHY 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus!
Mattew 24:36
36 “Concerning that day and hour nobody knows,neither the angels of the heavens nor the Son, but only the Father.
Mattew 23:8-10
8 But be not ye called teachers. for one is your Teacher, even Christ. 9 You are all brothers. And call no man father (Spiritual)upon the earth. for one is Father, which is in heaven.10 And be not ye called masters. for one is your Master, even Christ....
“YOU must not let people call you ‘leaders’-you have only one leader, Christ!” (Matthew 23:10, The New Testament) With these words, Jesus made it plain to his followers that no man on earth would be their leader. Their one Leader would be heavenly-Jesus Christ himself. Jesus holds this position by divine appointment..
Jehovah “raised him up from the dead and . . . made him head over all things to the congregation, which is his body.”-Ephesians 1:20-23.
2 Since Christ is “head over all things” with regard to the Christian congregation, he exercises his authority over all that takes place within the congregation. Nothing that occurs within the congregation escapes his notice. He closely observes the spiritual condition of each group of Christians, or congregation. This is clearly apparent in the revelation given to the apostle John at the end of the first century C.E. To seven congregations, Jesus stated five times that he knew their deeds, their strong points, and their weaknesses, and he gave counsel and encouragement accordingly. (Revelation 2:2, 9, 13, 19; 3:1,8,15,17) There is every reason to believe that Christ was equally familiar with the spiritual condition of other congregations in Asia Minor, Palestine, Syria, Babylonia, Greece, Italy, and elsewhere. (Acts 1:8) What of today?
th-cam.com/video/Oo9ytCWBYSw/w-d-xo.html
th-cam.com/video/K98ziVX7AHo/w-d-xo.html
Will vs. Intelligence > UBERmensch!
That's the UBERMENSCH.
Bishop Barron, do you hold with Pope Benedict XV1 on Youth: "... you all know how the community of believers has recently been wounded by the attacks of evil, by the penetration of sin inside, even into the heart of the Church." (Introduction to the "Youth Catechism of the Catholic Church", released by Vatican Radio on 2 February 2011). Oliver Clark trustee of the Job's Trust Disability Trust (cf. Job 42:3)
"Incoherent" (?)
Robert Barron’s purported presumed thinking about evangelisation (his mandate on his bishops’ conference) lacks keeping inseparability and qualitative equality of thinking and having faith as belief in uncertainty.
This as I believe defective thinking dabbles in consequentialism: “care for myself for the sake of my mission”, encouraging as I believe duopsony of “God uses persons and things for our salvation”, which “salvation” I believe he fails to see is economic advantage of tax and insurance concessions for families of the familyist family person groomers of him with a non-economic status inducement.
Oliver Clark, trustee of the Job's Trust Disability Trust for victims of this occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate grooming scandal, accredited by Pope St John Paul 11's Council for the Laity (letter 28/9/94) and the exorcist, Fr Gregory Jordan sj (d. 2017), for the Catholic Archdiocese of Brisbane, Australia
Um…what?
@@BishopBarron Um ... I try to see the "what" as an outsider believing I am an insider while keeping inseparability and qualitative equality of my procreation gift within the family and my need of union of identities in my family. Got it?
Do you 'get it' if in a role as an outsider to consecrated religious life celibacy you believed you have identity as a consecrated celibate while not knowing this role as yours and this identity as yours while keeping or allowing their covenant, non-presumed reciprocity?
@@oliverclark5604 Friend, I'd respond if I had the foggiest idea what you're talking about...
@@BishopBarron Bishop Barron, to your face, Newman with the great majority joined in invalid marriages as non-consecrated, including Anscombe, Von Hildebrand and Christopher Butler, purported presumed convert with Newman from Church of England to roman catholic identity unlike me in my maintaining my role as anglo-catholic, owe to the consecrated members of the family of the consecrated male female marriage of my father, Colin Clark, vowed to God in return for our example of keeping or allowing in uncertainty of belief of the inseparability and qualitative equality of subjective and objective.
This was our conclusion in our testing from 1946 in successive valid consecrated firstly male female then celibate marriages the multiplier in economics on the reference point of Mary of her keeping or allowing this inseparability and qualitative equality of her identities and roles in her successive consecrated marriages - celibate as mother of Jesus (Luke 1:38) and male female as Mother of God (Matthew 1:24).
This keeping or allowing by Jesus of the inseparability and qualitative equality of the subjective be-ing: “My God, my God why have you forsaken me?”, and the objective do-ing: “Father, into your hands I commit my spirit.”, in uncertainty of his and his mother’s belief receives objective and subjective, in his keeping or allowing their inseparability and qualitative equality, social confirmation in his resurrection.
In uncertainty, I believe that you are not joined in a consecrated marriage, or if so then without a reference point, nor in your acting and being do you/are you in uncertainty of belief as the keeping of the inseparability and qualitative equality of thinking and having faith. Hence you cannot have “the foggiest idea”.
Pope Francis on whose exercise of his absolute power of his simultaneous authorisations depends your ministry as ordained successively deacon, priest and Bishop does not exercise this absolute power of his authorisations of your ministry on 10 June 2021 in his giving example on my family’s reference point.
This example was given by Pope Francis in the cases of the Vatican state ten citizens/employees, including Cardinal Angelo Becciu, alleged embezzlement of his ensuring procreation role gift as a helper of his family within his family charity donations and the Italian state Parliament “Zan” anti-homophobia bill as an unacceptable risk of fraud on his identity as a consecrated celibate married by vows to man in Christ but when becoming “weary” (Exodus 17:12) purports to presume to do so as in/of a “higher vocation” (TTMHS, PCF, 1995, 35) on 15 March 2023 in his General Audience, or as you put it: “a higher way of life” at time 26:35 of TH-cam podcast of your interview by Lex Fridman: “Christianity and the Catholic Church”.
Firstly by “to his face” withstanding extreme tensions caused by the great majority not keeping or allowing inseparability and qualitative equality of eucharist do-ing and marriage be-ing , then before one or two, then before the whole community was counselled of me by exorcist, Fr Gregory Jordan sj, as his letters report of my withstanding as firstly to the face of Fr Ronald McKeirnan, Faith Education Coordinator of the roman catholic church role group Archdiocese of Brisbane, Australia, then before him, then before the whole community on the immediate reference point of my father, Colin Clark, simultaneously in 1964 before the UNO Food and Agriculture Organisation (eucharist) and the Vatican Council 2 Commission on Population (marriage).
The Community of the worldwide population is of family members in their identities and do-ing roles with a very few of them as their own helpers in do-ing roles since the great majority suffer grooming by their family member ‘familyists’ to purport to presume inversion of do-ing role and be-ing identity in purported presumed consecrated both celibate and male female marriage for non-economic advantages of purporting presuming “higher vocation” of consecrated celibate marriage causing the “worldwide catastrophe [of] the great majority of sacramental marriages are invalid” (Pope Francis, 10 June 2021, 16 June 2016) as they are occult as hidden, incest connected as substitute mate sexual abuse as then infecting their psychologically and or emotionally vulnerable family members only out occulted by consecrated marriage in uncertainty of belief withstanding the extreme tensions of uncontrollable:
“… oscillation between persistent forms of regressive “familyism” on the one hand and an affirmation of radical individualism on the other that, in destroying the family reverses the progress of humanisation, heedless of the long-term consequences of so doing.” (warning by Pope Francis’ delegate, Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia, as President of his Council for the Family in his address at the UNO on 15 May 2014, the UNO “The International Day of the Family”).
This address followed:
1. my not accepting been groomed with this purported presumed inversion in August 2010 as a family member beneficiary of the estate of my mother,
2. the Higgs Boson sub-atomic particle discovery on 4 July 2011 at the Geneva Hydron Collider,
3. the resignation of Pope Benedict on 4 March 2013 after his in error purporting presuming both:
(a) that the sexual abuse catastrophe was “recent” when it continued in the roman catholic church role group at least from St Paul’s “opinion” given at 1Cor7:25-34 of the superiority of consecrated celibate marriage to consecrated male female marriage,
(b) had entered the Church when having its genesis within the Church,
in his Introduction to the “Youth Catechism of the Catholic Church” on 2 February 2011,
4. from Pope Francis’ inaugural homily as Pope for the Mass on 19 March 2013 in his addresses correcting the direction of the entrusting of “some share in their duty to educate” their children” (GE, Vatican Council 2, 1965, 3) as not by parents to their helpers but by helpers of the family to the family.
@@BishopBarron Let me clear up what is not even “the foggiest idea” for you as to the relationship between your conceptions of your being in your family member identity in need of union and your capabilities for doing in your role as a procreation gift as a family member within the family. Rather you "can and must" (CL, 1988, 40) rely on the, in uncertainty, believing of those joined in consecrated marriages on the reference point of the two marriages of Mary as mother of Jesus and Mother of God.
It is not for you in your Bishop’s role to have an “idea” even a foggy idea about family members in their identities insuring against risk of your conduct to the safety of vulnerable family members by your role.
Your role is groomed by "the great majority" (Pope Francis, 16 June 2016) of family members such as me until I ceased my grooming of roles of helpers of my family on 25 February 1991.
From this date my "reference point" (TTMHS, PCF, 1995, 110) was my father, Colin Clark, commended with a papal medallion from Pope St Paul V1 for in his identity as a consecrated family member and his role as an economist and statistician commended by Keynes by keeping their inseparability and qualitative equality providing in 1964 measurements simultaneously for both this insuring and this ensuring finding them “inseparable” as reported by Pope Paul V1 in Humanae Vitae, 1968, 12.
That they were also ‘qualitatively equal’ was missed by my father and hence by Pope St Paul V1 but not by me and Pope Francis because our standpoint for comprehension of this keeping or allowing was in uncertainty of belief both Pope Francis and I believing our standpoint was in our identities when it was in our roles.
As hidden to us, our real standpoint in our in uncertainty believing out occulted the hidden or occulted standpoint purporting presuming “higher vocation” of celibate marriage vowed to man in Christ to male female marriage vowed to God such as is your standpoint.
This grooming of you causes you to purport to presume as you do to "know..." (Genesis 3:5) “a higher way of love” (your interview with Lex Fridman: “Christianity and the Catholic Church” at time c. 46:35 of the TH-cam podcast) or “higher vocation” of celibate marriage to male female marriage as both consecrated.
This inducement that you report of “a higher way of love” is occult as hidden and incest connected as substitute mate.
It is not possible for you to withstand this inducement by your doing role ‘idea” or your being identity but only in your role identity if of a consecrated marriage either male female or celibate and if on the reference point of the two marriages of Mary: one joined as consecrated male female with St Joseph as Mother of God and the other joined as consecrated celibate as mother of Jesus.
The insuring of identity in need of union as well as ensuring procreation role gift is the task of family members in keeping the inseparability and qualitative equality of their roles and identities which keeping or allowing is in uncertainty belief.
In my family member identity and role in my exercise of an absolute power of my simultaneous authorisations of my ensuring my procreation role gift and my insuring my need of union of my identity in my been joined in a consecrated marriage, I do this by requiring as I do now before all as my third step in my ministry of exorcism of diseased roman catholic church roles, on the reference point of what Mary as reported by her cousin, Elizabeth, in uncertainty (cf. Luke 1: 29, 34) "believed" (Luke 1:45) in her willing "let it be to me" (Luke1:38) in the two marriages of Mary, that you disclose to me this insurance cover for you against this risk and any tax exemption you have on your earnings or earnings of roles associated with you including as an ordained deacon and priest and then as a Bishop either as an Auxiliary as previously or as now an Ordinary.
Weak-ness-exploitation and tooling?