If you live in America they might even be “budget”, but in my country my xt-200 costs 6k of our currency. What a budget!! The minimum wage here is 1,2k 😐
One thing I just noticed about you that I am very impressed with, is that you don't talk to the camera as if it's a big group of people. So many TH-camrs and television personalities use the words "you guys" all the time, and that is one of the biggest No no's in broadcasting. And you don't do that. Very impressive.
From my research FujiFilm and personal opinion (without actually trying or owning any of these cameras) Fuji is the best camera for stills. Fujifilm’s lower end cams are even amazing for photography considering their price. Sony is definitely the all around camera, but considering psychology and since I’m coming from a street wear background. People choose Sony & Canon partially because of their name. Sony is a perfect blend of smooth and sharp, canon nails the color grade and diversity (M50). FujiFilm has IMO the best color science and just the way their photos look are cinematic. I’m not much into specs, but FujiFilm has imo the greatest photography cameras at the price points. The extra features in cameras (for both stills and video) are just so they can continually make new cameras without having certain features. Basically it’s a money scheme to try and put out the “perfect” camera so they can continue the demand of cameras instead of making one great “perfect” camera with a reasonable price range
@@iblameabel... Makes a lot sense Yeshua, and that is pretty much how I feel as well. As a beginner mainly still photographer I chose Fuji for those reasons. I did find the perfect camera for me at a price point that I thought was reasonable. Thank you for your input, much appreicated. :)
I like how you presented this. I just recently got a brand new xt200. It really depends on the lens for fuji on some usage and scenes. Kinda excited to get my first XF lenses by the weekend.
@@DA-fl5em It's more than what I could hope for. It really depends on what style of shooting you do. For burst shots, most of the time I don't drain the battery for 6hrs. While shooting 4k video most of the time gives me around 2 to 3 hrs since I don't shoot 4k straight all the time as I have my osmo action to assist me with it too. Overall, it's great. You also have an option to choose a high power output usage than standard. I suggest go for the high usage since it's a powerful camera.
@@johnsosito8340 I've been researching for about a week on what budget friendly camera should I purchase, and I think I am now 70% of choosing the X-T200 more than the Canon M50. Just to let you know that M50 was part of my option. By the way, may I ask how was the weather resistant/adaptability of X-T200? Because my country is always summer which is hot so I'm kinda worry also if it could affect the camera.
@@DA-fl5em hmmm, I'm from the Philippines and the weather is crazy as well. It's either hot or cold, I haven't experienced overheating issues so far you can also check my FB Page that I recently made for cycling photography which is John Sosito as well. It gets a bit hot when doing 4k vid, but I haven't experienced overheating. You may want to ask your local store for warranty regarding the overheating issue on some units. My unit is also brandnew and I have contacted fujifilm Philippines regarding the overheating issue, they're quite nice and accommodating that they'll be able to replace and repair for free within the warranty period.
Fuji wins when it comes to the entry level head to head. X-T4 also beats the A6600 In most aspects. Yes it cost a little more but its comparing flagships.
So I got the xt200 on sale with kit lens for 500 . Now I am going to sale the kit lens for 150-200. So I got the camera for 300$ . For 300$ the value on this camera is crazy 4k digital stabilize film scenes easy menus touch screen 👌. Wow I am impressed back when I was in college 2015 something like this would of cost 1500-2000
The record limit is just crippling :( - I have an X-T3 and the only way to record say an interview is to record the HDMI output, which is a massive extra cost.
1. Unlimited Video Recording at 4K 2. IBIS (Shitty but helps) 3. Sigma Toneh 1.4 Trio 4. Color Profiles 5. Bigger Battery 6. Dat sweet Eye Detect Autofocus in video 7. No Overheating 8........ I Will edit if I find more reasons.
I think the jumping exposure problem can be solved when Fuji releases new updates. I don't often record videos and even though I don't record in 4k. So I don't worry about the one-time video shooting time.
Great video, as always! I enjoy the comparisons, and have personally enjoyed working with both Sony and Fuji, and for very different reasons. But with the a6600 listed as your main camera and the a7iii as your secondary.. I'm now curious about a camera you haven't mentioned in a couple months.. did you decide not to keep your s1h?!
Get the Sony if you're that type of vlogger who shoots long video with "one take" only BUT if you're that type of vlogger who shoots multiple short clips to combine them later on, Fujifilm is best to pick.
Great video brother as always. As a fellow content creator I can get past that 15 min time on the Fuji. Damn shame because the quality looks good especially for the price.
It's possible to record for an unlimited time though you would need an external recorder which can cost a pretty penny. One main thing about the time limits though is that it will over heat.
A6600 is designed to be a 2nd "b-roll" camera for people who already owned a Sony full frame with all the ecosystem goodies such as sharing the same type of batteries, lenses, etc. If you aren't already a sony full frame owner with existing sony lenses and whatnot, I don't see why anyone should get a A6600 period. So many other good options out there.
Why pay more for even Fuji? Get Sony A6000. It’s enough for most people out there. I used to have XT-2 when I switched from Sony A6000. After 6 months I sold the Fuji XT-2 to get back into Sony again. Fuji is good but I just like Sony AF better. I bought Fuji because of their lens review and their outstanding color. But after a while I don’t see any advantage in Fuji system. Sigma 16 or 30 on Sony A6000 is just great if not better than any lens on Fuji XT-2. I also actually like the color on Sony better and still wonder what everybody was talking about when they said Fuji color is great. The Sony auto WB also did a better job than Fuji. I can pretty much can leave Sony on Auto WB 95% of the time while Fuji I had to adjust every time lighting situation change especially indoor pictures. If I’m going to spend that much on Fuji body like XT-4 again..I would rather spend money on A7 iii.
I have a question your video didn't answer. What size sd card did you use in the cameras? I'm asking this because they have previously removed the 4gb chunk if you use an sd card that is 64gb or larger.
I want to start vollging so which camera should I consider? M50 or xt-200?? Orr something else?? Laptop won't be able to handle 4K editing so focus on 1080p and also I am tight in budget.
jumping exposure in video of fujifilm camera can be fix by using fix aperture and auto iso, instead of auto aperture, the problem is caused by the fuji lens aperture blades are moving in steps instead of smooth movement.
For video isn't it always best to set the shutter speed? I thought you should never leave it in auto? Does the XT200 allow you to bypass the record limits by recording externally?
Can you please make review videos for the Fuji X-4 & the Fuji XS-10!? I want to see if I should get a Sony Apsc or one of those instead. Your camera reviews are the best on TH-cam
Can you please make a video on fujifilm xt-200 with a lens adapter attached to sigma 16mm f.14 sony e-mount and shoot videos in both 4k and 1080p plz if you can make a video on it
15 minute 4k record limit, no eterna profile, 8 bit video (although they both have that). If I had to get any APS-C I'd probably get the xt3 or wait for the xt4. By biggest conundrum is get the canon eos R, wait for the R5/6 get the A7iii or wait forever for the A7s iii? Or go straight in and get a blackmagic 4k. As a side question why does in body stabilization matter so much to you? The reason I ask is apart from when you're doing a vlog test on cameras 90% of your footage is in the studio.
Why go for full frame unless you really have to? They are heavy (especially the lenses) and expensive. I also find the 4K hype extremely over rated. 1080p is better for editing and its hard to see the difference. Whats more important is color, exposure, stable and sharp focus and good IBIS/digital stabilization AND great sound. I am very frustrated because there is no “perfect “ hybrid camera for photo and video. But I am very impressed by the Panasonic GH5(except AF) and the Fuji xt-4 seems promising. I currently own a Nikon D5600 which is a great photo camera but with terrible video AF. And I have a Ricoh GR3(love it), GoPro7 black.
TotalDiscussed when he reviews cameras he’s trying to review from a vlogger/content created perspective. Usually vloggers walk with a camera on a tripod body facing them and some form of stabilization is nice
what about the 1080p, and the 1080p 120fps (I heard that Sony 1080p is really bad, and soft)? I know that the preamp on the Fuji are terrible, producing a terrible audio hiss :(
About the stabilisation, none of the cameras have in body stabilisation. The stabilisation of the image happens in specifically made lenses. You can buy a lense for the Sony camera with built in stabilisastion.
Question? I know you like the Panasonic G85. I'm considering that camera vs the Fuji XT200. They are basically the same price (G85) marginally dearer. I want to use them for Vlogging and capturing Hiking trips and Adventure riding. Which do you think is the best? I have a Panasonic TZ80, which I will probably keep instead of buying a Telephoto - So I'm leaning towards the G85 (I like the pics the TZ80 creates). For the price difference I could put a cheap shotgun mike on the XT200. The Panasonic has better image stab... Also weather protection would be nice... Anyway be good to hear your thoughts. I was looking for a comparo between the XT200 and G85 but can't find one, which is kind of surprising.
Cool comparison of the real world differences between cameras. I always come to your videos, because the Ease of Use section is the most important to me. I would love for you to mention in future Fuji reviews that most of their lenses work like crap for video, because their focusing motor was not designed for it. So if you care about video, the apparent advantage of Fuji lenses dissapears. Any lens older than the 35 f2 will probably autofocus like a jittery mess.
I will say - Sony a6100 (for the AF) - Fuji XT-200 - Canon M50 But it depends on what you need, for example. You don't need 4K if your computer can't handle it or if you don't have that much space
The correct answer is to wait for the m50 mark 2. Canon is basically letting sony and fuji invent all the new stuff, and then stealing it for their own cameras. I mean think about it, if you don't need 4k, the m50 is one of the best cameras out there and it's like $500 right now because it's old. All canon needs to do is upgrade the m50 to have 60p 4k with less crop and the dual pixel autofocus in at least a few points on screen when filming and it's back on top. Maybe throw in a usb-c. Sony has the best autofocus, and... Well that's it. Get one with log profiles because you're going to need to fix the colors. That said, it gets the shot. I can fix colors, I can't fix focus. Fuji has antique looking plastic bodies with no grip and knobs in weird places. But the colors are fantastic... sometimes. It's a sensor made by sony, so IDK why it can't do sony's focus. But it's not amazing. Nikon came out with a brilliant apsc z50. But it only has 2 mediocre lenses and that's it. If they had made it an F mount lens which works with all the old lenses it would have been incredible. But as it stands you might as well buy a bridge camera if there's no lenses to swap to. I just want nikon's ergonomics, fuji's lenses and maybe their colors, sony autofocus, and canon menus with olympus ibis. All the tech we want already exists. But they want to slowly drain your wallet every year trickling out a bit more tech. A couple more megapixels. A flippy screen but no log format. Then a log format, but in an unusable frame rate. and just keep getting slightly more useable until they go out of business because cell phones have been filming network TV commercials for 5 generations now. There's not a long future in independent cameras except for maybe professional sports shooters.
Bad news mate, the canon m50 mark II is just a firmware update and the Fuji XT-200 is 500 dollars right now (I think it is on sale) that's a very good price! And better than the M50.
@@ronaldbenz_ I have the xa7 which is essentially the same thing. It does have good IQ and specs. Paid 500 for it too. Should have waited for the t200 lol. That is bad news. I had high hopes for the mkii. It just had to improve a little bit. 60fps and good af 4k. That's pretty much it. The biggest problem with the fuji is the feel. The ergonomics are poorly thought out, and the materials feel fake. It doesn't feel like a camera, it feels like it should have tic-tacs in it. Or avon aftershave. The m50 has some metal. It feels like something a professional would take on vacation. And to be fair it is fantastic for 1080. And stills. And it's frequently on sale for 500 as well. I prefer fuji, but that m50 is a pretty sweet little deal. Also the canon works with everything. My fuji looks horrible in lightroom, dxomark can't even get it setup and they are professional camera testers. Darktable won't load the images. I had some success with rawtherapee. Canon just works. That can be a big thing for people who are buying entry-level gear.
i'd like to see a comparison between canon m50 and x-t200 😀 i'm a fan of the flip out screen going towards the side rather than on top to make sure i can use the mount for mic 😄
Hey man , i have to buy my first camera should i go for fuji x t 200 or canon m 50 because they are offered at same price in india and i mostly gonna use it for videos/vlogs/B roll.
nice video.. would you recommend this xt 200 over a6100? xt200 on sale $500 now at bestbuy, but I rather spend more if needed for long-term investment.
Those recording time limits are a shame. It's a deal breaker on what is otherwise probably the best value in cameras. No one has a screen as good as the Panasonic S1 though, I tried one out at a local shop and being able to tilt up without folding out to the side is great for when you're not in the shot.
Great comparisson and thanks for fighting back bias as much as you did. Coming from Camp 6600, it matches my philosophy; make that one (or two) lenses work for as much of my needs as possible. I love the Sony image with the Sigma primes on board so I'm set. O tried my wife's XT-3, great image, but a little short on battery life for the run and gun that I want to do.
When you're showing the comparison, you should shoot the same subject using both the cameras under comparison, but that doesn't seem to be the case in this video.
Few more reasons to choose Sony, Sony has far more third party lenses which are amazing and affordable, Fuji not so much. a6600 has a much better battery life then the Fuji camera, I believe only the X-T4 will not come with a bigger battery.
theoretically, the best budget apsc camera will be the xt40 whenever its announced. As the x 10 series is always not as good as the xt flagship, but usually almost just as good... (the big difference almost always just being not dual card slots and not weather resistant) For example what one can currently get in a xt30 is just insane. No dual card slots and no shooting in the rain like the xt3 or the xt4 but it has 95% of what the xt3 has. For a long time it was even better autofocus wise and xt3 users had to wait forever for firmware updates to catch up to the xt30. (although even on release the xt3 was infinitely better AF wise than a xt2 or xh1)
I still like Sony more, side screen is distracting for me. I had Nikon d5600 and did not like eye shifting to side screen. Having a6600 ibis with oss lense does improve in any way? I currently have a6400 10-18 f4 oss.
Mene yh Camara liya or 7 days me Dad ho gya Mene sirf 1 day use kya aap log yh camera lene ki soch rhe ho to please Mt Lena Mujhe Iska Mumbai me service Center se bhi Achha response nhi mila mene inse request ki aap log camara Riplace bhi nhi kr rhe hai Service center se 2 baar Camara Repair hua lekin mera baar baar yhi problem aa rha hai
Hi from the UK. In the vlogging test you did, the Sony has noticeable blue fringing in the trees and sky in the background. Why is that? I have an A7R3 which does the same hence looking for the xt200 for my vlog camera, well that and the stabilisation whilst walking.
Does the A6600 have the harsh auto ISO stepping of the X-T200 as seen in your other video? Your comparison on that subject was a bit short. Great video otherwise!
I also doubt that many users need to record more than 15 minutes of continuous 4K footage in one go generally. I certainly don't anyway which is why I bought an X-T200 recently as my first APS-C camera. To answer your 4K video file size question, the X-T200 doesn't create one big 15 minute file. Instead, in common with many other cameras, it saves the footage as 3 separate files which add up to about 10.5gb. Recording @30fps, the first two files are always 4gb in size, each one giving you around 5 minutes 45 seconds of footage. The 3rd file is 2.5gb and makes up the remaining 3.5 minutes of the total 15 minutes footage.
@@DeepakSharma-ng9yh I considered all those cameras myself. They all take excellent photos but I decided on mirrorless with their lower weight, which ruled out the Canon 200D MKII. I also compared the spec of the X-T200 against the 2-year older Canon M50 and the X-T200's bigger, higher resolution LCD screen, greater flash range, non-cropped oversampled 4K video and classy retro-style looks swung it for me. Battery life between charges could be better but I have always carried a spare battery with me with every camera I have ever owned so it is not an issue. I am very happy with my choice anyway.
@@moody_blue682 Thanks for the response and help one more thing, most of the reviewers talk abt overheating issues in Fujifilm XT200 is that really an issue ?
@@DeepakSharma-ng9yh Never had that problem myself but then I am not a vlogger and rarely need to shoot video for long continuous periods which is the most likely cause of overheating with any camera. As a test when I first got the X-T200, I did try shooting 15 minutes of continuous 4K @ 30FPS video indoors using regular pan and zoom while shooting to see if the camera around the battery compartment got hot but it was fine and when I took the battery out, it was only warm to the touch. Exactly what I would expect really. The battery was certainly not hot by any means. However, I live in the temperate UK. If I lived in a hot country and was shooting outdoors in the hot sun, it might have made a difference. Generally though, it is always a good idea to pull the LCD screen away from the camera while shooting long continuous video as it will allow air to circulate around the camera better and keep it cooler.
I was planning to buy Fuji camera after all that praises across the Internet but no one told me the most imp DEAL BREAKER.. Fuji can record for only 15 mins what ? Really ? I am not going to Fuji anymore ,,
It frustrates me that these cameras' category is called "budget" and they cost all the money I was able to save for the past year.
😂🙌🏻 You're not alone!
So true bro that hurts
I smell w2
😂😂
If you live in America they might even be “budget”, but in my country my xt-200 costs 6k of our currency. What a budget!! The minimum wage here is 1,2k 😐
You’re officially one of my most trusted camera youtubers right now. Really good advice!
Same with me
It cool how helpful u are even during this corona period
I gotta be me 🤣
With the X-T200 now on sale for $499 with the kit lens, I think it's too good a deal at this price point to pass up! Very helpful review as always!
@ 499 it's beats the 6100/6400
It's an absolute steal the fact that the Canon m50 is priced higher in my country just makes it so worth
One thing I just noticed about you that I am very impressed with, is that you don't talk to the camera as if it's a big group of people. So many TH-camrs and television personalities use the words "you guys" all the time, and that is one of the biggest No no's in broadcasting. And you don't do that. Very impressive.
Buck Wilde I’ve been vlogging wrong. I will take note of your comment to improve my videos. Thank you!
What do you say as an alternative?
@@Princeton_James Speak like your talking to an individual. Just say "you" instead of "you guys".
never thought about that!
Does anybody review the "photo' end of a camera anymore? Good review on the video aspects of the camera but I was looking for photo specs.
Same here, everyone wants to be a youtuber, lol
@@k_8609 yes no one talking about photo quality ..camera was made for that
From my research FujiFilm and personal opinion (without actually trying or owning any of these cameras) Fuji is the best camera for stills. Fujifilm’s lower end cams are even amazing for photography considering their price. Sony is definitely the all around camera, but considering psychology and since I’m coming from a street wear background. People choose Sony & Canon partially because of their name. Sony is a perfect blend of smooth and sharp, canon nails the color grade and diversity (M50). FujiFilm has IMO the best color science and just the way their photos look are cinematic. I’m not much into specs, but FujiFilm has imo the greatest photography cameras at the price points. The extra features in cameras (for both stills and video) are just so they can continually make new cameras without having certain features. Basically it’s a money scheme to try and put out the “perfect” camera so they can continue the demand of cameras instead of making one great “perfect” camera with a reasonable price range
@@iblameabel... Makes a lot sense Yeshua, and that is pretty much how I feel as well. As a beginner mainly still photographer I chose Fuji for those reasons. I did find the perfect camera for me at a price point that I thought was reasonable. Thank you for your input, much appreicated. :)
Great comparison! Did an unboxing video on the fujifilm x t-200 yesterday and I'm really impressed with it so far
I like how you presented this. I just recently got a brand new xt200. It really depends on the lens for fuji on some usage and scenes. Kinda excited to get my first XF lenses by the weekend.
May I ask, how was the battery capacity of your X-T200? How long does it last?
@@DA-fl5em It's more than what I could hope for. It really depends on what style of shooting you do. For burst shots, most of the time I don't drain the battery for 6hrs. While shooting 4k video most of the time gives me around 2 to 3 hrs since I don't shoot 4k straight all the time as I have my osmo action to assist me with it too. Overall, it's great. You also have an option to choose a high power output usage than standard. I suggest go for the high usage since it's a powerful camera.
@@johnsosito8340 I've been researching for about a week on what budget friendly camera should I purchase, and I think I am now 70% of choosing the X-T200 more than the Canon M50. Just to let you know that M50 was part of my option.
By the way, may I ask how was the weather resistant/adaptability of X-T200? Because my country is always summer which is hot so I'm kinda worry also if it could affect the camera.
@@DA-fl5em hmmm, I'm from the Philippines and the weather is crazy as well. It's either hot or cold, I haven't experienced overheating issues so far you can also check my FB Page that I recently made for cycling photography which is John Sosito as well. It gets a bit hot when doing 4k vid, but I haven't experienced overheating. You may want to ask your local store for warranty regarding the overheating issue on some units. My unit is also brandnew and I have contacted fujifilm Philippines regarding the overheating issue, they're quite nice and accommodating that they'll be able to replace and repair for free within the warranty period.
@@johnsosito8340 Oh wow that's great! Thanks for the info.
Fuji wins when it comes to the entry level head to head. X-T4 also beats the A6600 In most aspects. Yes it cost a little more but its comparing flagships.
I think they are both totally different ballparks..
Greattt review!!! Its decided...xt-200 it is...the only thing i am hesitant about, is the recording time limit😭
How do you like your camera ,cuz im planning to buy one and im hesitant about that too.
Excellent video as usual! One of the best channels for camera real-life usage!
So I got the xt200 on sale with kit lens for 500 . Now I am going to sale the kit lens for 150-200. So I got the camera for 300$ . For 300$ the value on this camera is crazy 4k digital stabilize film scenes easy menus touch screen 👌. Wow I am impressed back when I was in college 2015 something like this would of cost 1500-2000
The record limit is just crippling :( - I have an X-T3 and the only way to record say an interview is to record the HDMI output, which is a massive extra cost.
As a former Fuji user their autofocus is maddeningly frustrating. Everything else is lovely.
1. Unlimited Video Recording at 4K
2. IBIS (Shitty but helps)
3. Sigma Toneh 1.4 Trio
4. Color Profiles
5. Bigger Battery
6. Dat sweet Eye Detect Autofocus in video
7. No Overheating
8........
I Will edit if I find more reasons.
No thermal problems like fuji
Sifat Rabby don’t forget “Rolling Shutter.” I returned my a6400 ASAP horrible rolling shutter with any slight movement
i experienced that rolling shutter with the 6400 and 6100
Fuji xt200 should have battle with a6100... at least they have similar price
@@Ekyllier how do you find your xt200. Which lens do you use?
Hi dad, Which do think is better the sony a6600 or the lumix g95? Can you do the comparison about this two cameras? Thanks
Hi, which one would you pick between fuji xt200 and sony zve10 for casual cityscape/night photography and video making ??
Fujifilm Is Photography Focused, While ZV-E10 Is The Opposite.
12:45 hey thats me.
I'd love to be a fly on the wall watching them design flip up screens for invisible microphones.
I think the jumping exposure problem can be solved when Fuji releases new updates.
I don't often record videos and even though I don't record in 4k. So I don't worry about the one-time video shooting time.
Great video, as always! I enjoy the comparisons, and have personally enjoyed working with both Sony and Fuji, and for very different reasons. But with the a6600 listed as your main camera and the a7iii as your secondary.. I'm now curious about a camera you haven't mentioned in a couple months.. did you decide not to keep your s1h?!
Get the Sony if you're that type of vlogger who shoots long video with "one take" only BUT if you're that type of vlogger who shoots multiple short clips to combine them later on, Fujifilm is best to pick.
Great video brother as always. As a fellow content creator I can get past that 15 min time on the Fuji. Damn shame because the quality looks good especially for the price.
Yeah I wish they’d either let us choose to let it record until it overheats or figure out their thermal processes in the camera.
@@TheEverydayDad agree. Charge an extra 100 bucks and make it happen. Would still be a great price.
It's possible to record for an unlimited time though you would need an external recorder which can cost a pretty penny. One main thing about the time limits though is that it will over heat.
A6600 is designed to be a 2nd "b-roll" camera for people who already owned a Sony full frame with all the ecosystem goodies such as sharing the same type of batteries, lenses, etc. If you aren't already a sony full frame owner with existing sony lenses and whatnot, I don't see why anyone should get a A6600 period. So many other good options out there.
People are saying 1080p on xt200 isn’t good
Who
Where you at bro? The views are amazing!
sir a small advice which is best sony a6400 or fuji xt30 for vlogging and photography at travelling
Xt-200 good for photography?
Yes super
Why pay more for even Fuji? Get Sony A6000. It’s enough for most people out there. I used to have XT-2 when I switched from Sony A6000. After 6 months I sold the Fuji XT-2 to get back into Sony again. Fuji is good but I just like Sony AF better. I bought Fuji because of their lens review and their outstanding color. But after a while I don’t see any advantage in Fuji system. Sigma 16 or 30 on Sony A6000 is just great if not better than any lens on Fuji XT-2. I also actually like the color on Sony better and still wonder what everybody was talking about when they said Fuji color is great. The Sony auto WB also did a better job than Fuji. I can pretty much can leave Sony on Auto WB 95% of the time while Fuji I had to adjust every time lighting situation change especially indoor pictures. If I’m going to spend that much on Fuji body like XT-4 again..I would rather spend money on A7 iii.
I have a question your video didn't answer. What size sd card did you use in the cameras? I'm asking this because they have previously removed the 4gb chunk if you use an sd card that is 64gb or larger.
Do you think sony will send a firmware update to fix the ibis issue on a6600?
I want to start vollging so which camera should I consider? M50 or xt-200?? Orr something else?? Laptop won't be able to handle 4K editing so focus on 1080p and also I am tight in budget.
I just got xt200 today, it's on sale right now and I think it's best bang for buck at the moment.
How bad is the auto-exposure jumping in video on the Fuji? Is there a workaround to get better auto-exposure in video?
jumping exposure in video of fujifilm camera can be fix by using fix aperture and auto iso, instead of auto aperture, the problem is caused by the fuji lens aperture blades are moving in steps instead of smooth movement.
For video isn't it always best to set the shutter speed? I thought you should never leave it in auto? Does the XT200 allow you to bypass the record limits by recording externally?
Great video. Worth the effort
Can you please make review videos for the Fuji X-4 & the Fuji XS-10!? I want to see if I should get a Sony Apsc or one of those instead. Your camera reviews are the best on TH-cam
Can you please make a video on fujifilm xt-200 with a lens adapter attached to sigma 16mm f.14 sony e-mount and shoot videos in both 4k and 1080p
plz if you can make a video on it
15 minute 4k record limit, no eterna profile, 8 bit video (although they both have that). If I had to get any APS-C I'd probably get the xt3 or wait for the xt4. By biggest conundrum is get the canon eos R, wait for the R5/6 get the A7iii or wait forever for the A7s iii? Or go straight in and get a blackmagic 4k. As a side question why does in body stabilization matter so much to you? The reason I ask is apart from when you're doing a vlog test on cameras 90% of your footage is in the studio.
Why go for full frame unless you really have to? They are heavy (especially the lenses) and expensive. I also find the 4K hype extremely over rated. 1080p is better for editing and its hard to see the difference. Whats more important is color, exposure, stable and sharp focus and good IBIS/digital stabilization AND great sound. I am very frustrated because there is no “perfect “ hybrid camera for photo and video. But I am very impressed by the Panasonic GH5(except AF) and the Fuji xt-4 seems promising. I currently own a Nikon D5600 which is a great photo camera but with terrible video AF. And I have a Ricoh GR3(love it), GoPro7 black.
TotalDiscussed when he reviews cameras he’s trying to review from a vlogger/content created perspective. Usually vloggers walk with a camera on a tripod body facing them and some form of stabilization is nice
what about the 1080p, and the 1080p 120fps (I heard that Sony 1080p is really bad, and soft)? I know that the preamp on the Fuji are terrible, producing a terrible audio hiss :(
About the stabilisation, none of the cameras have in body stabilisation. The stabilisation of the image happens in specifically made lenses. You can buy a lense for the Sony camera with built in stabilisastion.
Does anybody know why this is the last camera review that the everyday Dad has made?
hi, which camera colour is more closer to real life in auto mode?
I want to buy a camera in 70k, mainly for videography. Please suggest its urgent.
potato jet tried shooting ling periods with the a6600 and it stops at 13hours. but who does film straight more then 13 hours lol
mikel magdadaro a 24 hours timelapse 😅
Can u use the usb c on the xt200 to charge it even when it's on?
One thing I noticed in the comparison the rolling shutter is much less noticeable on the fuji film camera.
Is the stabilisation on the xt 200 as good as the gopro hero 8? I'd like a camera for low light
Heck no.
Question? I know you like the Panasonic G85. I'm considering that camera vs the Fuji XT200. They are basically the same price (G85) marginally dearer. I want to use them for Vlogging and capturing Hiking trips and Adventure riding. Which do you think is the best? I have a Panasonic TZ80, which I will probably keep instead of buying a Telephoto - So I'm leaning towards the G85 (I like the pics the TZ80 creates). For the price difference I could put a cheap shotgun mike on the XT200. The Panasonic has better image stab... Also weather protection would be nice... Anyway be good to hear your thoughts. I was looking for a comparo between the XT200 and G85 but can't find one, which is kind of surprising.
Great audio - what do you use?
Cool comparison of the real world differences between cameras. I always come to your videos, because the Ease of Use section is the most important to me. I would love for you to mention in future Fuji reviews that most of their lenses work like crap for video, because their focusing motor was not designed for it. So if you care about video, the apparent advantage of Fuji lenses dissapears. Any lens older than the 35 f2 will probably autofocus like a jittery mess.
Sony 6100 vs M50 vs Xt200? Which one is your advise ?
Watch DPReview
I will say
- Sony a6100 (for the AF)
- Fuji XT-200
- Canon M50
But it depends on what you need, for example. You don't need 4K if your computer can't handle it or if you don't have that much space
I suggest getting a camcorder for vlogging.. for the same price range, the sony AX43 has a built-in gimbal
The correct answer is to wait for the m50 mark 2. Canon is basically letting sony and fuji invent all the new stuff, and then stealing it for their own cameras. I mean think about it, if you don't need 4k, the m50 is one of the best cameras out there and it's like $500 right now because it's old. All canon needs to do is upgrade the m50 to have 60p 4k with less crop and the dual pixel autofocus in at least a few points on screen when filming and it's back on top. Maybe throw in a usb-c.
Sony has the best autofocus, and... Well that's it. Get one with log profiles because you're going to need to fix the colors. That said, it gets the shot. I can fix colors, I can't fix focus.
Fuji has antique looking plastic bodies with no grip and knobs in weird places. But the colors are fantastic... sometimes. It's a sensor made by sony, so IDK why it can't do sony's focus. But it's not amazing.
Nikon came out with a brilliant apsc z50. But it only has 2 mediocre lenses and that's it. If they had made it an F mount lens which works with all the old lenses it would have been incredible. But as it stands you might as well buy a bridge camera if there's no lenses to swap to.
I just want nikon's ergonomics, fuji's lenses and maybe their colors, sony autofocus, and canon menus with olympus ibis. All the tech we want already exists. But they want to slowly drain your wallet every year trickling out a bit more tech. A couple more megapixels. A flippy screen but no log format. Then a log format, but in an unusable frame rate. and just keep getting slightly more useable until they go out of business because cell phones have been filming network TV commercials for 5 generations now. There's not a long future in independent cameras except for maybe professional sports shooters.
Bad news mate, the canon m50 mark II is just a firmware update and the Fuji XT-200 is 500 dollars right now (I think it is on sale) that's a very good price! And better than the M50.
@@ronaldbenz_ I have the xa7 which is essentially the same thing. It does have good IQ and specs. Paid 500 for it too. Should have waited for the t200 lol. That is bad news.
I had high hopes for the mkii. It just had to improve a little bit. 60fps and good af 4k. That's pretty much it.
The biggest problem with the fuji is the feel. The ergonomics are poorly thought out, and the materials feel fake. It doesn't feel like a camera, it feels like it should have tic-tacs in it. Or avon aftershave.
The m50 has some metal. It feels like something a professional would take on vacation. And to be fair it is fantastic for 1080. And stills. And it's frequently on sale for 500 as well.
I prefer fuji, but that m50 is a pretty sweet little deal.
Also the canon works with everything. My fuji looks horrible in lightroom, dxomark can't even get it setup and they are professional camera testers. Darktable won't load the images. I had some success with rawtherapee. Canon just works. That can be a big thing for people who are buying entry-level gear.
i'd like to see a comparison between canon m50 and x-t200 😀 i'm a fan of the flip out screen going towards the side rather than on top to make sure i can use the mount for mic 😄
The Only TH-cam CAMERA SHOW that i LOVE❤️
Hey man , i have to buy my first camera should i go for fuji x t 200 or canon m 50 because they are offered at same price in india and i mostly gonna use it for videos/vlogs/B roll.
Same country , same question buddy .
Same here - do you have the answer by now ??
just got my first camera in 30 years and got the x-t200. Great deal right now at B&H camera.
I was wondering to get a6100
But after this deal definitely I will get the xt200
how's the photo quality of it?
@@soorajsnair1224 photo quality of xt200 is awesome
nice video.. would you recommend this xt 200 over a6100? xt200 on sale $500 now at bestbuy, but I rather spend more if needed for long-term investment.
Those recording time limits are a shame. It's a deal breaker on what is otherwise probably the best value in cameras. No one has a screen as good as the Panasonic S1 though, I tried one out at a local shop and being able to tilt up without folding out to the side is great for when you're not in the shot.
Love your vids.
Definitely getting the a6600. Wondering if I should get JUST the body so I may get different lenses...
Just wondering how long the Fuji T200 can record in 1080, is it unlimited?
30 mins, from a comment in other xt200 review video
I remember when you reviewed cameras. Those were the days.
HE shifted to other stuff because he got more views in it..
Which camera is good for photography
New xt200 or Used a7 for photography? Thanks
A7
Is this a fair comparison since the a6600 offers the color profiles and the xt200 does not? A6100 would be the equivalent comparison, no?
But still a great video! Thanks for the content.
Definitely getting the A6600 soon
Great comparison 👌
Great comparisson and thanks for fighting back bias as much as you did. Coming from Camp 6600, it matches my philosophy; make that one (or two) lenses work for as much of my needs as possible. I love the Sony image with the Sigma primes on board so I'm set. O tried my wife's XT-3, great image, but a little short on battery life for the run and gun that I want to do.
Does the Fuji have that thermal limitation if you record in 1080?
what do you recomend me? Fujifilm xt30 or xt200 help
Xt30
When you're showing the comparison, you should shoot the same subject using both the cameras under comparison, but that doesn't seem to be the case in this video.
Is B&H still delivering these cameras to other countries?
I don’t know, I’d shoot them an email 👍
is there some music playing veeeeery low in the background ?
Few more reasons to choose Sony, Sony has far more third party lenses which are amazing and affordable, Fuji not so much. a6600 has a much better battery life then the Fuji camera, I believe only the X-T4 will not come with a bigger battery.
Which one is better xt200 or xt30
Can you do a fuji xt200 and sony a6100 comparison?
Stay Safe from Global Pandemic
Love from Philippines
Keep making awesome videos. Stay safe!
dynamic range in the fuji is very good imho
theoretically, the best budget apsc camera will be the xt40 whenever its announced. As the x 10 series is always not as good as the xt flagship, but usually almost just as good... (the big difference almost always just being not dual card slots and not weather resistant)
For example what one can currently get in a xt30 is just insane. No dual card slots and no shooting in the rain like the xt3 or the xt4 but it has 95% of what the xt3 has. For a long time it was even better autofocus wise and xt3 users had to wait forever for firmware updates to catch up to the xt30. (although even on release the xt3 was infinitely better AF wise than a xt2 or xh1)
Ryan Allison I'm hoping the X-T40 has the same screen as the xt200!
Does the xt200 have an overheating issue?
Yes it has
If i dis not have 3 panasonic cams inwould buy fuji 200 and xt4 but i am happy with my gh5 family
Canon m50 FTW! Going to wait till the a6600 goes on sale.
I still like Sony more, side screen is distracting for me. I had Nikon d5600 and did not like eye shifting to side screen. Having a6600 ibis with oss lense does improve in any way? I currently have a6400 10-18 f4 oss.
Not really I wish the Sony cameras had better ibis 😭
The Everyday Dad thanks, just saved $1200 + tax lol 😆
@@100x35Vlogs bought my a6600 for around $900 on B&H. Student discount 👍🏽
@@JoseTorres17 for real? That's a steal!
I've watched your review. Now, i know that you're 100% Sony Fanboy
Mene yh Camara liya or 7 days me Dad ho gya
Mene sirf 1 day use kya aap log yh camera lene ki soch rhe ho to please Mt Lena Mujhe Iska Mumbai me service Center se bhi Achha response nhi mila mene inse request ki aap log camara Riplace bhi nhi kr rhe hai Service center se 2 baar Camara Repair hua lekin mera baar baar yhi problem aa rha hai
how much bits is the Fuji?
I wanna know how long it took you to edit this video!
Panasonic G85 as my first camera in 2020? Yay or nay?
how can the Sony be budget camera I don't have 1K to spend on a camera
now the Fujifilm x-t200 is a budget camera
Great video - thank you
you sure about the 10bit external?
Which camera?
Plz sir make a video on fujifilm X A7 vs SONY A6400
Hi from the UK.
In the vlogging test you did, the Sony has noticeable blue fringing in the trees and sky in the background.
Why is that?
I have an A7R3 which does the same hence looking for the xt200 for my vlog camera, well that and the stabilisation whilst walking.
The Sony does actually have a limit. It's 30 hours LOL. But still It IS a limit.
Imagine that Sony recording for years.
@@ronaldbenz_ there's one guy who has recorded for a year but time-lapse
Except the Sony would be toast long before it could ever reach that anyway.
Does the A6600 have the harsh auto ISO stepping of the X-T200 as seen in your other video?
Your comparison on that subject was a bit short. Great video otherwise!
who is recorded at 4 k for more than 15 min file how big is a 4k file for 15 min of video?
I also doubt that many users need to record more than 15 minutes of continuous 4K footage in one go generally. I certainly don't anyway which is why I bought an X-T200 recently as my first APS-C camera.
To answer your 4K video file size question, the X-T200 doesn't create one big 15 minute file. Instead, in common with many other cameras, it saves the footage as 3 separate files which add up to about 10.5gb. Recording @30fps, the first two files are always 4gb in size, each one giving you around 5 minutes 45 seconds of footage. The 3rd file is 2.5gb and makes up the remaining 3.5 minutes of the total 15 minutes footage.
@@moody_blue682 am confused among Canon M50, 200D Mark ll and XT200, which one would you suggest dear. Please advise
@@DeepakSharma-ng9yh I considered all those cameras myself. They all take excellent photos but I decided on mirrorless with their lower weight, which ruled out the Canon 200D MKII. I also compared the spec of the X-T200 against the 2-year older Canon M50 and the X-T200's bigger, higher resolution LCD screen, greater flash range, non-cropped oversampled 4K video and classy retro-style looks swung it for me. Battery life between charges could be better but I have always carried a spare battery with me with every camera I have ever owned so it is not an issue. I am very happy with my choice anyway.
@@moody_blue682 Thanks for the response and help one more thing, most of the reviewers talk abt overheating issues in Fujifilm XT200 is that really an issue ?
@@DeepakSharma-ng9yh Never had that problem myself but then I am not a vlogger and rarely need to shoot video for long continuous periods which is the most likely cause of overheating with any camera. As a test when I first got the X-T200, I did try shooting 15 minutes of continuous 4K @ 30FPS video indoors using regular pan and zoom while shooting to see if the camera around the battery compartment got hot but it was fine and when I took the battery out, it was only warm to the touch. Exactly what I would expect really. The battery was certainly not hot by any means. However, I live in the temperate UK. If I lived in a hot country and was shooting outdoors in the hot sun, it might have made a difference. Generally though, it is always a good idea to pull the LCD screen away from the camera while shooting long continuous video as it will allow air to circulate around the camera better and keep it cooler.
I was planning to buy Fuji camera after all that praises across the Internet but no one told me the most imp DEAL BREAKER.. Fuji can record for only 15 mins what ? Really ? I am not going to Fuji anymore ,,
Buy it nice or buy it twice 👍
That’s very true 🤣
I'm sorry whats this supposed to mean? (im small brain)
@@triliner254 buy a good camera on the first try
@@moenlighted7681 Oh ok. I already figured it out months ago LOL. But thanks anyways.
@@triliner254 you still have the small brain?