100%. In this youtube video (with all the caveats that entails) the sharpness and the color is much better with the a6400 video. Not sure why he didn't do more subjective color correction to remove the unnatural green haze on the Red image. Softness and unnatural color is certainly a common choice for movie production but not good for youtube comparison showing real world images that we expect to look real and be sharp.
@@curtisbme exactly. i remember when i watched this video a year ago i also prefered the a6400. when you get more into cameras you begin to like unnatural color, because there's more "details" in the highlight and shadows. most people would prefer the a6400 in this video. but camera geeks would prefer the RED camera.
Whenever a new camera comes out I'm always waiting for gene's comparison with the red. He's 100% going to make one with the blackmagic pocket cinema camera 6k😂
That's because you see a lot of screens everyday around you and in a way it forms your taste, because due to lower power consumption human brain likes what it's already familiar with. Since 6400 picture is basically a cellphone picture, it will appeal to wide audience nowadays. Nothing wrong with it. Blackmagic also went this road in Pocket 4K, it's more like GH5 now picture-wise, rather than movie-like like original Pocket Camera or Production camera from Blackmagic. I for one love Fujifilm X-T30 with old Soviet lenses because it's an anti-cellphone picture Color-wise, but my taste in matter is in minority crowd for sure.
I could identify the camera instantly on the first shot, however, after luts applied and color corrected I can say that the difference is not a lot under my perspective. You do have to take care about the shots, I don't know a lot about the technical differences between the two but OOTB the sony seems more red and has a synthetic sharpening. The good thing is that this differences can be corrected in post, create a preset and your are mostly done. Thank you for your review, not very informative but you can make your own judgement on the looks.
@@waynelast1685 well..standards, details, file formats, reliability ecc...by the way i bought a sony a6400 recently with a sigma 30mm f 1.4 lens. I LOVE IT.
@@waynelast1685 People making videos notice it. If you are a film maker, then you won't be able to produce something that looks digitally enhanced, and synthetic. Movie audiences are really so stupid, they don't deserve the level of detail and the cinematic beauty of movies. Thank god that we still have beautiful art. Never ask "why" something should be beautiful. Never take beautiful art for granted. Consider ourselves lucky that beautiful art still exists.
No lie, I've had the a6400 for almost a month and I am beyond impressed with the quality! This thing is absolutely PERFECT for TH-camrs. Only downside in my opinion is the weak battery life. But with the ability to use the camera while plugged in and with some extra batteries, not even noticeable. Also the lack of IBIS is not even as big a deal as most people are making it out to be. LOVE this camera. Nice video!
Solid comparison as always bro! For me, with all these awesome cameras, I've found that I need to work on my story telling more than anything. The camera is becoming inconsequential for basic online content, but when you're spending a ton of cash on a shot or explosions, being able to push color or half a stop of DR makes sense in the pro world.
Every time Panasonic release something blackmagic make it obsolete (hello gh5s). Nobody will buy their overpriced ff cameras now. They should've gone the apsc route like bm.
Both are cameras are very iconic, and while one may seem to have the upper hand, they both preformed to such an outstanding degree in regards to quality, and features. Great Video!😀
4:39 I keep trying to justify getting maybe a BMPC4k or even go futher and get a Red Komodo to replace my A6400 as im SORTA starting to notice my limitations with it (really when it comes down to only being able to shoot 8-bit), but i honestly dont think im THAT experienced yet where ive hit that point where i feel completely limited to what i get out of my A6400. I did a shoot yesterday out on a boat and I was shooting in SLOG-2 the entire day. My autofocus even with NON sony lenses (used the Tamron 16-70 F2.8) was just spot the heck on. It was so amazing. Ofcouirse I had those shots for creative purposes I needed to go manual focus but when i was in autofocus? It was spot in, super fast, just love Sony auto-focus. Id like to see a video where you see the drawbacks in the autofocus. I WILL ADMIT in a bit LOWER light situations? Yea the autofocus struggles a tiny bit, but i mean a "tiny" bit. Nothing that makes me rage over
These “Which camera is which” opening poles aren’t fun for me anymore... Mr. Jet has taught me enough that i always get it right. Also, blah blah blah, green tint.... no ones mentioning highlight roll off. That was the give away right away for me.
Hey potato! I actually learned from your comparison videos about the green tint of cinema cameras. I tried pushing some greens into the shadows of my sony camera and it worked pretty nicely! Thanks for the content as always!
Searched the whole internet for a simple and clear explanation of HLG vs. SLOG, and yet none of everything I watched was as clear and straight to the point as the Potato Jet's video.
Yeah it was hard but you can generally tell a film camera from a pro-sumer camera because the film cameras seem to have less contrast or something which gives you room to color grade later
0:39 the right side is definitely RED Camera... I type as I saw the video, don't judge me hard The context: Before I watch Potato Jet, I literally don't know anything about camera especially videography. Now I get the conclusion: everything with less vibrant is professional camera, so you can color calibrate it with ease. While commoner camera already post processed some of the images to make it appear more "appealing" to most of people. edit: Yay... I am right... give me the certificate :P
Yes! Especially the LENS! DOF has a big impact on image perception, lens color rendition based on coatings and quality of optical elements probably has an even bigger impact!
Man i'm watching you since you had like less than a 1000 subscribers and i always knew you'll grow really fast on this platform. Look at you now at 381K subscribers, really impressive!
It's not that the RED is green, the Sony just isn't properly capturing and rendering green in the image, making it too magenta or too blue in certain shots.
@@jozosaravanja1626 Go look at it compared to Arri, RED more yellow and Arri is more red. When you compare cinema cameras to consumer cameras it's almost always the green that gives it away.
It’s super funny how, next to the a6400 with its oversharpening and apparently pink tint, the red looks green and darn near out of focus. If you saw it on its own, you probably wouldn’t think that, but the side by side messes with you.
When I first started watched this channel I could never tell the difference but my eye has become more "trained" and now I can tell the cinema camera next the the consumer camera instantly
What you get as advantage with profiles and bit rate, bit depth, you lose on auto focus that can't be used reliably for continues video work and you have much worse low light performance. So its a trade of. If you can control the light and have focus puller, GH5 makes more sense. For youtube run and gun stuff, or simple vlogging a6400 makes perfect sense.
@@hoangvunguyen9311 Sure. In your original post you mentioned GH5 not GH5s, so yes that would be close in low light performance to large sensor camera like APS-C. As for autofocus, yeah if you don't need it that is great. If you are solo operator and doing gimble work, auto focus is indispensable for vlogging or run and gun work where you want shallow depth of field. There is a tool for each job. and today we have more choices than ever and new ones are on the way, so we can't complain much. :) Cheers!
@@KrunoslavStifter the gh5 also has the amazing ibis which would be key for vlogging for me... the gh5 autofocus actually got much better with latest updates, works fine now not as good as a6400 ofc but still fine. And yeah lowlight isn't good, but there are low aperture lenses or the speedboosters of af doesn't matter, the a6400 also doesn't have great low light
looking after the using lust its quite close.... may be after that you said which is red or Sony than i might have selected Sony for red..for the price of screen.
So, basically, if I take my Sony, defocus it a bit, then slide the whole color pallette to toward green and desaturate it some, I don't need to buy a Red? Good to know.
Most have no idea what shooting back in the 35mm film days was. I used to shoot with a Pentax-K, all manual even the focus. Now I have the Sony a6400 which has the best AF to date.
Just bought the LUT pack, I plan on getting an a6400 as a 2nd cam for wedding shoots. My main cam is an FS5II. The a6400, a7III, and FS5ii all use the same "Venice" color profile. You may want to relabel the LUT pack to Sony Venice LUT pack as it will be great for matching grades between all the new Sony cams with the Venice profiles. Sure I will get a little more contrast on my FS5 but thats something I can tweak after. May increase sales especially when the A7SIII comes out.
Am I the only one holding my breath every time the potato is back on the skateboard? Considering pity-buying the LUTs just so you can beef up that insurance.
Yes. Because because different camera have different Bayer Filter(leads to different colour science) and different camera brands have different colour or picture profile and hence good LUTS have to be made specifically for a very niche settings.
Great video! Do you have this Luts for the Sony A7 iii? If so would it work for Final Cut Pro X ? Really like your videos bringing friendship atmosphere !
That was so easy. The one one the right just has that movie feel to it for some reason. While the Sony seemed to have a sharper image, it also looks like a home video.
You have this unusual cadence when you speak, that is kinda, mesmerizing. I can see you taking over those David Attenborough nature docs! Great videos Gene.
Right one is red and left one is A6400. Reason being that in right one you can see more details on close white and black backgrounds. In 0:50 car reflection of sun, 0:53 white car behind, 0:55 under the table at the black area, 0:59 nostrils, 1:04 chest area. If I'm wrong then I'll buy the A6400
I've been tweaking my own LUTs for the Sony mirrorless cameras over the last two years, only to have them change the colour on me lol. I can't say I've been inclined to check out anyone else's Sony LUTs until you put these out. Good work! It was very cool seeing an episode of you here with your partner in crime visiting Matti. Your collaborations with him are something I always look forward to. Nice people coming together to do what they enjoy makes for fun watching!
$4k camera can do the same of what red can do.. but when you are producing movie with hundreds of millions budget, you don't bother throwing 80k or more at it.. and I don't mind using red for movies cuz they have to keep lot details for edit and for 8k resolution. But I don't get the fukin point in marques and linus using several of red cameras.
All cameras are amazing now. We can nitpick little details, but jeez, any camera in 2019 would’ve blown my 12 year old 8mm Handycam-using mind back in ‘99.
Dynamic range and highlight roloff is a super quick giveaway always in these comparisons, then color differentiation, but overall the differences are subtle.
Just bought the LUTs. Can't wait to upload them. Thanks. I shoot outdoors at a pistol range and often run into a lot of sunny shots and this should help fix it for me. Thanks! Also subbed too!
I like how you did this, a real Jedi mind trick. I watched the video for the comparison and left wanting to buy your LUT pack. Bravo my friend...Bravo.
The a6400 with color grading just, just blew my mind off, the results Sony can achieve with such a tiny camera is just out of this world.
I was asking why is quality of video so poor on both cameras.
In the end of the video I realised I was watching in 360p
It's easy to know which one is the RED because it always has that greenish look to it
Simarjit Singh that green looks nasty
Could always change the tint to the other side a bit
Particularly in skin tones, where you really, really don't want a greenish tint!
the skins doesn't looks green, it looks more natural, plus RED's footage are meant to be color graded,
Yeah honestly i don't like that green tint
I’m clearly clueless. Thought the one on the left was preferable. Great video.
same :P
100%. In this youtube video (with all the caveats that entails) the sharpness and the color is much better with the a6400 video. Not sure why he didn't do more subjective color correction to remove the unnatural green haze on the Red image. Softness and unnatural color is certainly a common choice for movie production but not good for youtube comparison showing real world images that we expect to look real and be sharp.
@@curtisbme exactly. i remember when i watched this video a year ago i also prefered the a6400. when you get more into cameras you begin to like unnatural color, because there's more "details" in the highlight and shadows. most people would prefer the a6400 in this video. but camera geeks would prefer the RED camera.
Because of the overall clarity. The Red is smoother and not quite as 'bright', but far more accurate colors and lighting.
Same lol
Whenever a new camera comes out I'm always waiting for gene's comparison with the red. He's 100% going to make one with the blackmagic pocket cinema camera 6k😂
Absolutely!
@@PotatoJet I'm really waiting to see that. It's definitely going to be gory...
I guessed )
Potato Jet
Do you happen to be giving away a Blackmagic Pocket Cinema Camera 4k any time soon? Hmmm...?
@@PotatoJet Hi, I got a 6400. How can I build the Cinema JETPACK LUT? Can you give me the entire setting? Thanks
Left Sony, Right RED.
The colors had it fairly obvious (green-ish) at first, but the lighting really made it clear
yep
honestly i liked the a6400 in some situation more than the red. its a bad feeling but its true xD
just Tom you're not alone
So did I and I was directing a pro shoot today with a red!
Me too! Wild!
That's because you see a lot of screens everyday around you and in a way it forms your taste, because due to lower power consumption human brain likes what it's already familiar with. Since 6400 picture is basically a cellphone picture, it will appeal to wide audience nowadays. Nothing wrong with it. Blackmagic also went this road in Pocket 4K, it's more like GH5 now picture-wise, rather than movie-like like original Pocket Camera or Production camera from Blackmagic. I for one love Fujifilm X-T30 with old Soviet lenses because it's an anti-cellphone picture Color-wise, but my taste in matter is in minority crowd for sure.
@@vladimirtomin8223 bruh "cellphone picture"... What are you on about😂
Toyota Vs Ferrari
Toyota supra*
@@Atheefff yes 😳😳😳😳
I could identify the camera instantly on the first shot, however, after luts applied and color corrected I can say that the difference is not a lot under my perspective. You do have to take care about the shots, I don't know a lot about the technical differences between the two but OOTB the sony seems more red and has a synthetic sharpening. The good thing is that this differences can be corrected in post, create a preset and your are mostly done. Thank you for your review, not very informative but you can make your own judgement on the looks.
you mean, the difference is not a LUT under your perspective.....haha...ha.....
you could even just lower the sharpening in the profile to get rid of that synthetic sharpening
99% of people won’t notice a difference so why spend thousands more? I’m sure there must be some reasons.
@@waynelast1685 well..standards, details, file formats, reliability ecc...by the way i bought a sony a6400 recently with a sigma 30mm f 1.4 lens. I LOVE IT.
@@waynelast1685 People making videos notice it. If you are a film maker, then you won't be able to produce something that looks digitally enhanced, and synthetic. Movie audiences are really so stupid, they don't deserve the level of detail and the cinematic beauty of movies. Thank god that we still have beautiful art. Never ask "why" something should be beautiful. Never take beautiful art for granted. Consider ourselves lucky that beautiful art still exists.
No lie, I've had the a6400 for almost a month and I am beyond impressed with the quality! This thing is absolutely PERFECT for TH-camrs. Only downside in my opinion is the weak battery life. But with the ability to use the camera while plugged in and with some extra batteries, not even noticeable. Also the lack of IBIS is not even as big a deal as most people are making it out to be. LOVE this camera. Nice video!
your color grading always givesaway which one is red
always more greenish than other camera
Hmm I would say it always has a yellowish tint too
so true!
I agree haha
Yeah, it always makes me feel like I have cataracts and I hate it.
I can always tell Red and ARRI from the softer image. The smaller cameras definately do more sharpening
Solid comparison as always bro! For me, with all these awesome cameras, I've found that I need to work on my story telling more than anything. The camera is becoming inconsequential for basic online content, but when you're spending a ton of cash on a shot or explosions, being able to push color or half a stop of DR makes sense in the pro world.
Black magic pocket cinema camera 6K is relesed with super 35
RIP to all other indie video cameras
Nah I think many indie films will still go for UMP 4.6k. Better dynamic range and better support for larger crews
Every time Panasonic release something blackmagic make it obsolete (hello gh5s). Nobody will buy their overpriced ff cameras now. They should've gone the apsc route like bm.
they're making everyone else look silly at the moment
Just need about 100 gigs for like 5 minutes of footage.
The a6400 has this magenta love thing going, so your LUT turns reds into orange to make skin tones more natural. (See neon sign at 8:09)
You are right
Wait I definately got this one...
LEFT: -Red Cinema- *A6400*
RIGHT: -A6400- *Red Cinema*
I''m watching this on a 4k tv.. and i really do prefer the footage from the a6400.. i didn't see that coming!
Same 🫣
Both are cameras are very iconic, and while one may seem to have the upper hand, they both preformed to such an outstanding degree in regards to quality, and features. Great Video!😀
4:39 I keep trying to justify getting maybe a BMPC4k or even go futher and get a Red Komodo to replace my A6400 as im SORTA starting to notice my limitations with it (really when it comes down to only being able to shoot 8-bit), but i honestly dont think im THAT experienced yet where ive hit that point where i feel completely limited to what i get out of my A6400. I did a shoot yesterday out on a boat and I was shooting in SLOG-2 the entire day. My autofocus even with NON sony lenses (used the Tamron 16-70 F2.8) was just spot the heck on. It was so amazing. Ofcouirse I had those shots for creative purposes I needed to go manual focus but when i was in autofocus? It was spot in, super fast, just love Sony auto-focus. Id like to see a video where you see the drawbacks in the autofocus. I WILL ADMIT in a bit LOWER light situations? Yea the autofocus struggles a tiny bit, but i mean a "tiny" bit. Nothing that makes me rage over
These “Which camera is which” opening poles aren’t fun for me anymore... Mr. Jet has taught me enough that i always get it right.
Also, blah blah blah, green tint.... no ones mentioning highlight roll off. That was the give away right away for me.
“Hey mom, just so you know I’m bringing my $25,000 camera to the cookout. Yeah, it’s for another TH-cam video. Love you too mom, see you soon, bye.”
Hey potato! I actually learned from your comparison videos about the green tint of cinema cameras. I tried pushing some greens into the shadows of my sony camera and it worked pretty nicely! Thanks for the content as always!
How did you do this?
Searched the whole internet for a simple and clear explanation of HLG vs. SLOG, and yet none of everything I watched was as clear and straight to the point as the Potato Jet's video.
Maybe i could tell a difference if you didn’t make a cut to an other scene every millisecond 😛
That did make it pretty difficult. I do the same thing in my edits anytime I have a GoPro shot. lol
lmao I could tell the different in less than a third of a second on the first example.
Yeah it was hard but you can generally tell a film camera from a pro-sumer camera because the film cameras seem to have less contrast or something which gives you room to color grade later
0:39 the right side is definitely RED Camera...
I type as I saw the video, don't judge me hard
The context: Before I watch Potato Jet, I literally don't know anything about camera especially videography.
Now I get the conclusion: everything with less vibrant is professional camera, so you can color calibrate it with ease.
While commoner camera already post processed some of the images to make it appear more "appealing" to most of people.
edit:
Yay... I am right... give me the certificate :P
and we never saw the luts again
A6400 after the HLG applied blew my mind trully. It looks almost like proper film.
I think the sony looked better
jes 👌🏽👌🏽
me too!!
same!!
100% thought the left was the red camera it looked 10/10
it's because the red was badly color graded
I’m trying to buy your Sony luts for so long that I made my own lol
Instant purchase! Thanks 4 LUT pack! Thumb UP :)
Yes. I’m buying your LUTS! 😳🙌🏽 the footage you took looks like a movie I’d watch over and over
1. You should use the same lens on both.
2. Use PP6(or S-log) and correc it to green RED cololor profile.
Yes! Especially the LENS! DOF has a big impact on image perception, lens color rendition based on coatings and quality of optical elements probably has an even bigger impact!
Man i'm watching you since you had like less than a 1000 subscribers and i always knew you'll grow really fast on this platform. Look at you now at 381K subscribers, really impressive!
You can always spot this greenish color of red.
It's not that the RED is green, the Sony just isn't properly capturing and rendering green in the image, making it too magenta or too blue in certain shots.
@@TechnoBabble In every comparison red had greenish tint. It's not just sony comparison.
@@jozosaravanja1626 Go look at it compared to Arri, RED more yellow and Arri is more red. When you compare cinema cameras to consumer cameras it's almost always the green that gives it away.
Just bought a6400 LUT. I was waiting for this. Can't wait to use it.
You already making too much RED comparison videos, that i already know the colors of RED cameras.
It’s super funny how, next to the a6400 with its oversharpening and apparently pink tint, the red looks green and darn near out of focus. If you saw it on its own, you probably wouldn’t think that, but the side by side messes with you.
You gotta do the xt-30 vs the a6400 they seem like such perfect competitors
When I first started watched this channel I could never tell the difference but my eye has become more "trained" and now I can tell the cinema camera next the the consumer camera instantly
Why not try the GH5 in its full max settings? C4K 10bit 422 Prores HQ
I tried to color graded with my GH5 footage and It looked pretty close to RED camera.
What you get as advantage with profiles and bit rate, bit depth, you lose on auto focus that can't be used reliably for continues video work and you have much worse low light performance. So its a trade of. If you can control the light and have focus puller, GH5 makes more sense. For youtube run and gun stuff, or simple vlogging a6400 makes perfect sense.
Krunoslav Stifter I never use auto focus while filming. Gh5 low light performance is a bit off but still work for me.
@@hoangvunguyen9311 Sure. In your original post you mentioned GH5 not GH5s, so yes that would be close in low light performance to large sensor camera like APS-C. As for autofocus, yeah if you don't need it that is great. If you are solo operator and doing gimble work, auto focus is indispensable for vlogging or run and gun work where you want shallow depth of field. There is a tool for each job. and today we have more choices than ever and new ones are on the way, so we can't complain much. :)
Cheers!
@@KrunoslavStifter the gh5 also has the amazing ibis which would be key for vlogging for me... the gh5 autofocus actually got much better with latest updates, works fine now not as good as a6400 ofc but still fine. And yeah lowlight isn't good, but there are low aperture lenses or the speedboosters of af doesn't matter, the a6400 also doesn't have great low light
Thanks for labeling left and right. Probably would have thought the left side was right and vice verse without that. Lifesaver!
looking after the using lust its quite close.... may be after that you said which is red or Sony than i might have selected Sony for red..for the price of screen.
Hey, I designed the Gordon Parks banner at 5:35! And also, nice video.
So, basically, if I take my Sony, defocus it a bit, then slide the whole color pallette to toward green and desaturate it some, I don't need to buy a Red? Good to know.
Kind of. The dynamic range is the main differences. Other than that, we can adjust the a6400 and make it as close as it can to RED.
@@hanscfs That comment was (MOSTLY) tongue-in-cheek. ;-)
is it just me or is the 6400 way more clear too ?
You kids are soo lucky with the kind of camera you have today, I'm still using my Ricoh xr500 which is a slr and uses film btw
Most have no idea what shooting back in the 35mm film days was. I used to shoot with a Pentax-K, all manual even the focus. Now I have the Sony a6400 which has the best AF to date.
@@Vince1648 btw I NEVER used a slr
a6400 SOOC footage looks so much better than the RED. The magenta tint can be dialed down in camera.
Just bought the LUT pack, I plan on getting an a6400 as a 2nd cam for wedding shoots. My main cam is an FS5II. The a6400, a7III, and FS5ii all use the same "Venice" color profile. You may want to relabel the LUT pack to Sony Venice LUT pack as it will be great for matching grades between all the new Sony cams with the Venice profiles. Sure I will get a little more contrast on my FS5 but thats something I can tweak after. May increase sales especially when the A7SIII comes out.
Could you make a review-fieldtest of the video-dslr Nikon D7000 ?
Crazy how close the comparison is getting between these consumer friendly cameras and big cinema cameras.
I actually prefer sony a6400 after grading with ur luts💖💖💖
Am I the only one holding my breath every time the potato is back on the skateboard? Considering pity-buying the LUTs just so you can beef up that insurance.
I have question, is LUT has to be specific to camera and color profile ???
Yes. Because because different camera have different Bayer Filter(leads to different colour science) and different camera brands have different colour or picture profile and hence good LUTS have to be made specifically for a very niche settings.
Ryan Thor Thanks Ryan for clarification.
Just did a collab with another TH-camr with this camera and the Tamron 17-28mm. Wow that AF tracking is just amazing!
why there's no link on the red camera?!
Always look forward to your gear comparison videos. You make them so enjoyable to watch.
Great video! Do you have this Luts for the Sony A7 iii? If so would it work for Final Cut Pro X ? Really like your videos bringing friendship atmosphere !
You could color grade it to look the same..and soften up the image a bit with a Canon lens etc..basically not big difference..
No one:...
Imo-san: *”GO BUY MY LUT”*
WOW! With your custom profile and grade it looks amazingly close to the RED!
noone:
absolutely NOBODY:
Potatoe Jet: RED VS *insert popular camera here*
LMFAO...
Canada: Please walk on the grass!!
America:Please get off the grass, we sprayed chemicals in it!!
I might not be first, but I'm here regardless 😁👍!
That was so easy. The one one the right just has that movie feel to it for some reason. While the Sony seemed to have a sharper image, it also looks like a home video.
You have this unusual cadence when you speak, that is kinda, mesmerizing. I can see you taking over those David Attenborough nature docs! Great videos Gene.
Oh no, a man fan
No he sounds like an pretentious douch but I really like his videos he makes it work.
the blown sky gave it away, you can tell the dynamic range has left the room
I’m still trynna figure out how Potato Jet got that girl 😅
Get a sense of humour and a career and it'll do the trick
Right one is red and left one is A6400. Reason being that in right one you can see more details on close white and black backgrounds. In 0:50 car reflection of sun, 0:53 white car behind, 0:55 under the table at the black area, 0:59 nostrils, 1:04 chest area.
If I'm wrong then I'll buy the A6400
The red footage now looks more like arri when compared to the sony
Your so good to to watch ......Your informative with a great sense of humor Jean ...............
Everything looks good on a phone
How about 50" tv
I've been tweaking my own LUTs for the Sony mirrorless cameras over the last two years, only to have them change the colour on me lol. I can't say I've been inclined to check out anyone else's Sony LUTs until you put these out. Good work! It was very cool seeing an episode of you here with your partner in crime visiting Matti. Your collaborations with him are something I always look forward to. Nice people coming together to do what they enjoy makes for fun watching!
$4k camera can do the same of what red can do.. but when you are producing movie with hundreds of millions budget, you don't bother throwing 80k or more at it.. and I don't mind using red for movies cuz they have to keep lot details for edit and for 8k resolution. But I don't get the fukin point in marques and linus using several of red cameras.
Arri cameras are much cheaper and far better for TH-cam too.
I haven’t even watched the video yet and I’m already going to say great video. Can’t wait.
"THORONO...."
Was my pronounciation correct?
Dude! Your LUT pack is awesome! I am thinking of grabbing the a6400 so I'm going to have to grab those LUTs too.
If there's RED in the title, I click.
Now I want a red camera. My sony will never feel the same
Random comment: what do you think of the film "Free Solo"?
Great doc I loved it saw it in IMAX
You look like one of those commercials from insurance companies at 7:40 - 8:03
Sony looks way better. Red looks like hot garbage!
Lol
do you know anything about cameras lol
"Hey hey guys look I have a big expensive camera! Look at me guys!"
All cameras are amazing now. We can nitpick little details, but jeez, any camera in 2019 would’ve blown my 12 year old 8mm Handycam-using mind back in ‘99.
Being colourblind makes the comparison videos extra fun 🤔
Dynamic range and highlight roloff is a super quick giveaway always in these comparisons, then color differentiation, but overall the differences are subtle.
You finally got me to buy a LUT pack. Keep making great content.
man sonys with HLG look really good! great video!
I love your laid back and jovial style.
Just bought the LUTs. Can't wait to upload them. Thanks. I shoot outdoors at a pistol range and often run into a lot of sunny shots and this should help fix it for me. Thanks! Also subbed too!
Can this LUT use with Sonya6600 ?
Thx ✌️
I've never been a Sony shooter, but I can admit the A6400 has me tempted to try it out.
thanks much for the review potato jet. I'm actually getting one tomorrow (08.10.2019). it really help me a lot to decide of getting the sony a6400
I like how you did this, a real Jedi mind trick. I watched the video for the comparison and left wanting to buy your LUT pack. Bravo my friend...Bravo.
Watching your priceless videos confirms the saying “ it’s never about the type of camera..”
so F** EOS R I’m going with the M50 for a starter
Find but should compare against a similarly priced camera. Not just pro gear!
Not only the color but also DR also gave it out from the first shots
As with every project, it's the right tool for the job. Great stuff, as always, Gene! Keep. It. Up.
Your luts are nuts !!
If you wanna catch cinematic ambiance, there are effects. You can do that, with effects. In my perspective, little one's enough.
Good comparison and demo 👍
Having just bought an A6400 I was more of a fan of the left shot so I’m pretty happy about this lol
me too.....
You should do a comparison with the A7SII and a RED