Actual MPG of my 2024 Tacoma

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 12 ม.ค. 2025

ความคิดเห็น • 61

  • @mattheinbaugh46
    @mattheinbaugh46 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    The truck can vary obviously depending on how you drive. On back roads in normal being a leisurely driver I’ve gotten 23. Usually get 18-21. On a road trip I got 24-26 in eco mostly highway. I’ve also gotten 14 on a short “fun” trip. Truck is awesome. If you want good gas mileage you can get it. If you want to play with it…you most certainly can. Fast and torquey.

  • @RicardoZ590
    @RicardoZ590 2 วันที่ผ่านมา

    Wow-on my first tank of gas on my 2024 TRD sport 4x4, I used eco mode the whole time and my truck says 16.5 mpg. Getting ready to top it off and reset the trip meter, really hope things get better quickly

  • @randomfootages9120
    @randomfootages9120 7 วันที่ผ่านมา

    I loved your MPG test with the 2024 Tacoma-seriously impressive! Want to take those numbers even higher? Try Pennzoil Ultra Platinum SAE 0W-20 Full Synthetic Motor Oil! It’s built to reduce friction and optimize engine performance, which could give you a real MPG boost, especially in the mix of traffic and highways you tested.
    As a Tacoma owner, you want top performance whether you’re off-roading or cruising. Pennzoil Ultra Platinum doesn’t just clean; it protects under stress, handles extreme temps, and keeps your engine running like new. That means less wear, more power, and potentially even better fuel efficiency!
    With your off-road adventures, this oil’s advanced protection is exactly what your engine needs to keep performing at its best, mile after mile. Imagine smoother rides, longer engine life, and yes-better MPG!
    How about testing it out in your next video? A fresh oil change and measuring the MPG difference could be a game-changer, and your viewers would love to see the results!
    Let’s see if Pennzoil takes your Tacoma to the next level!

  • @tomsabo6739
    @tomsabo6739 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Interesting. I put 34" tiles on my 2024 trd offroad and struggle to get 15 mpg combined. And I baby it when driving.

    • @trdtakeover
      @trdtakeover  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Tires definitely have a big effect. If I put bigger tires on I'll do a comparison video.

    • @gilflores1032
      @gilflores1032 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I installed 285/70/17 and I can see the difference in mpg. I went from avg 23 mpg down to 19 mpg. It’s still not too bad, but I bought the truck for off road and camping.

  • @donays8241
    @donays8241 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Testing in streets is good information, because mosley TH-camrs tests in hwy.
    Tacoma did very well this time.

  • @mikesawyer1336
    @mikesawyer1336 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Oh wow. That's better than the last gen! Great, I will add though that It's not shocking to me - My 23 Frontier with NA 3.8 gets 20.3 mpg overall and 25 MPG on the highway ( i'm a slow driver )

    • @beexiong2995
      @beexiong2995 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You should do a calculated test. The frontier computer is known to over estimate its mpg by like 2

  • @danwarren8010
    @danwarren8010 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Good test course but needs to be 250 to 300 miles long, short drives have to large of % error.

  • @chapmanbmw054
    @chapmanbmw054 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    anyone notice the jdm
    lc100 vx at 8:08

  • @mohmdaged1697
    @mohmdaged1697 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great video

  • @rlnaughton
    @rlnaughton 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Your MID is displaying 264 miles range on a full tank. If you got 23.5mpg, that would mean you can expect as much as 427.7 miles range on a full 18.2 gallon tank. Goes to show that Toyota has it set to keep a few gallons in the tank even though it says empty, in your case, you would have about 163 miles of range left when it says empty. I have the exact same Tacoma as you do and my range has always displayed way less than what it actually gets.

    • @trdtakeover
      @trdtakeover  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Absolutely. I haven't checked the owners manual for this, but when I owned a RAV4 (which has a smaller tank) it had a 2.2 gallon buffer stated in the manual.

  • @2wind2000
    @2wind2000 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    $4.15 a gal? Forgot what that was like! With the cost of these new pickups, every mile counts. 23mpg combined isnt too bad! I just cant justify the OTD cost of these trucks though.

  • @Dayota___
    @Dayota___ 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Once you modify putting like lift kits, bigger tires, do overlanding with all of those weights. Your mpg will absolutely going down! I bet it is still much better than the fully decked out overlanding 3rd gen Taco mpg!

  • @jasonfreeman6551
    @jasonfreeman6551 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I have never seen over 18 on mine

    • @trdtakeover
      @trdtakeover  หลายเดือนก่อน

      What type of driving do you do primarily? Also, do you have any non-stock items on your truck?

  • @JohnandKelbi
    @JohnandKelbi 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Is this the hybrid? What tires are on the truck?

    • @trdtakeover
      @trdtakeover  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      No, not the hybrid. 265/70/17 BF Goodrich Trail Terrain T/A.

  • @terrypitzer8678
    @terrypitzer8678 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Do that test again, 350 miles and tell me what you get.

    • @trdtakeover
      @trdtakeover  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      72 miles is more than sufficient to get an average. All EPA tests are less than 11 miles each.

  • @wilyceyote
    @wilyceyote 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    It gets good mpg’s now, but wait until you fully loaded with gear are other things in Tacoma then tested again see what the gas mileage is then

    • @trdtakeover
      @trdtakeover  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Well, EPA estimates are not calculated with a load like that, so it's still impressive that we exceeded expectations with the test.

    • @beexiong2995
      @beexiong2995 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Safe to say the 4th gen is more efficient than the 3rd.

    • @trdtakeover
      @trdtakeover  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@beexiong2995 absolutely

    • @wilyceyote
      @wilyceyote 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@beexiong2995 Until you, load it down with gear, then it gets about the same or worse gas, mileage try again

    • @noxnyc23
      @noxnyc23 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@wilyceyoteyes I’m gna mount a 50 mil gun then lets talk gas consumption.. people who can afford these trucks not that they are hard to attain arnt buying it for mpg.. what your seeing here is a single person driving the truck will be 80 percent of the time this truck will be driven. So yeah don’t hate that it is better than the v6 third gen. It’s just facts.. I’ve own a 3rd gen and now own a 24. It’s better all around. Can’t really even say what I miss about the 3rd gen. It’s a great truck but the 4th gen just really is that yeah better..

  • @magickaldood
    @magickaldood 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Dynamometer

  • @eddieBoxer
    @eddieBoxer หลายเดือนก่อน

    I get 24.9 MPG.

    • @trdtakeover
      @trdtakeover  หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for sharing. Is your Taco all stock?

  • @xedniw23
    @xedniw23 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    said the same things about the 3rd gens, and thats what i got too. with the tire choice/tire size/weight of usual tacoma ownership you will see this drop 5-6 mpg. id hope that the 4cyl is better on fuel than its 6cyl predecessor, id hope that it would be even better actually. with issues modifying the 4th gens, extortionate markups its not justifiable to me to even consider a new when 25 - 30k i can buy someones used and already setup 3rd gen or spend similar on a full SAS gen1 with a v8 swap.... not impressed

    • @beexiong2995
      @beexiong2995 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Trd jon has 35s I think on his 2024 trd and is gettin 18 mpg hwy. Just for comparison

  • @maxmorrison9195
    @maxmorrison9195 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Kills my tundra….

  • @joseg.5937
    @joseg.5937 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +7

    I have a 2016 Sprinter cargo van with a 2.1 L4 cylinder diesel and I get 24 miles per gallon driving like I stole it and the cargo full of tool boxes, Toyota can do better

    • @trdtakeover
      @trdtakeover  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      It's mostly because you're using diesel, which is 25-30% more efficient in MPG than gas.

    • @beexiong2995
      @beexiong2995 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      ​@@trdtakeover right on. Dont know why people think diesel and gas are equal

    • @onesiktaco
      @onesiktaco 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not a fair comparison my friend! Plus your mpg is not that great for a diesel! Had a 99 f350 dually with the 7.3l power stroke and got 18 mpg pulling a 4 horse trailer loaded!

    • @slothypunk
      @slothypunk 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ok, you got 24 mpg on diesel though, you pay more for the same mpg with gasoline!

  • @Voodoo452
    @Voodoo452 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Spoiler Alert, it doesnt get what it claims...

  • @spiderbitedml385
    @spiderbitedml385 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    This is sad the 23s are way better then this 24 I can get 26 miles to the gallon in my Tacoma but I don't have any lights here just stop and yeios signs

    • @trdtakeover
      @trdtakeover  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I've never had anywhere close to 26 mpg in a 3rd gen Tacoma.

    • @michael184272
      @michael184272 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Last of the V6 engines

    • @hulsey19750
      @hulsey19750 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Gen3 is a gutless gas hog. I know I got a 23 I hate the motor I wish I had this one with the 8 speed

    • @alexsmba
      @alexsmba 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The 3.5 Atkinson cycle engine is a gutless piece of shit.

  • @onlineslacker101
    @onlineslacker101 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    My 2020 Mustang GT gets way better highway MPG.

    • @trdtakeover
      @trdtakeover  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      That's not surprising. Cars are much more aerodynamic and that's 25% lighter than the Tacoma's weight.

    • @XploreAz
      @XploreAz 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Are you really comparing a car to a truck? 😂🤣

  • @RayBan-x8u
    @RayBan-x8u 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    The new Tacoma lacks quality. After much research and hands on, test drive I decided on a 2024 TRD off road premium 4runner for a little more than a stock sr5 4x4 Tacoma.

    • @trdtakeover
      @trdtakeover  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      What types of quality issues? I haven't had any quality issues. No issues with plastic rattling, plastics feel good, etc.

    • @RayBan-x8u
      @RayBan-x8u 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@trdtakeover driver's side interior door handle slight separation. When you close the door. Mickey mouse plastic mudflaps. Too much hard plastic interior parts. Put together in Mexico.

    • @michael184272
      @michael184272 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Last of the V6 engines

    • @nightwing8666
      @nightwing8666 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@RayBan-x8u3rd gen is also put together in mexico bruh