The BEST Camera EVER!
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 พ.ค. 2024
- Go to squarespace.com/Chelsea & save 10% off your first website or domain with code “Chelsea"
Check out our #1 PHOTOGRAPHY BOOK on Amazon: help.tc/s
OUR STORE: sdp.io/sdpbook
Use our 10% off coupon 'TH-cam'
The OLYMPICS are comong in the summer of 2024 and that means we're going to get new camera gear. The Canon R1 might make an appearance in time to show off on the sidelines. Sony is due to put out two new cameras, which one will they decide to show off at the big event? Can Nikon put out a new update or camera in time for the games? Tony and Chelsea make their predictions and wishes based on rumors and their camera desires! - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
Go to squarespace.com/Chelsea & save 10% off your first website or domain with code “Chelsea"
Best camera ( and best camera ) :
Megapixels: how much does it matter if the camera has 24 or 30 megapixels, because it doesn't automatically make the camera better if it has more resolution.
I don't know why photo cameras have video, and there's always something wrong with them :
In focus, colors, coding ... ( -> boring ) .
They are not like film cameras, news cameras.
I didn't get anything out of this program.
And I don't know what you were trying to say ( what camera is the best 2023 ? ).
Although I have noticed for a long time that you are exceptional people who follow what is happening in the camera world.
I don't have the same enthusiasm myself, but sometimes I can still watch your program.
Good luck and winter 👍☺👋👋👋
At 23:55 Tony says the Z9 sync speed is only 1/160s but according to the manual (and my use) it is 1/200s. I'd love to see it increased to 1/400s (without using HSS ) though.
I have the Z8 you’re right it is 1/200 th !
Image stabilization when shooting video on the Nikon Z9 and Z8, even with a long lens, is amazingly steady, maybe the best of the bunch. Also, you CAN currently transfer your images directly from a Nikon camera to your computer using Nikon’s Wireless Transmitter Utility that is a free download. I’ve used it and it works. It’s still not going to be anywhere as fast as transferring directly from a CFexpress B card using a fast reader as it will be limited to the speed of your local wireless network and the 5G that is built into the camera so it isn’t the way to go with a large number of RAW files but JPEG’s can be moved fairly quick.
i am like they never shot sports , because you dont really need 30,50,60fps raw etc... . Sport photographers send jpg-s , because everyone want to be the first that post the photo , no one have time really for a lot of editing . And why they have problem with electronic shutter , when you shot like at least 1/400 to 1/2000 in most of the sports ?
Olympus Pro Capture is amazing. Ya’ll don’t give them the credit they deserve. I use pro capture all of the time to capture birds in flight. It’s funny how it’s taken other camera manufacturers so long to compete with pro capture, live comp, starry sky AF etc… Regardless of the MFT format and light gathering issues, you cannot deny how innovative they have been. I hope they launch a full frame system with the same features. They will dominate!
As a Sony APS-C shooter, I am disappointed with their A6700, so I'm waiting patiently for their stacked sensor camera. In the meantime, I'm keeping one eye open for the OM-1 II and OM 100-400mm II.
Let them bring that tech to the L-Mount Alliance and see what happens!
And maybe more streamlined menus too would be nice XD
MFT has potential that is not being developed, think about it, if you can do it in full frame then you can do it 4x faster in MFT. I use MFT in Lumix and Oly and where they shine is in durability/resistance to the elements; I have taken both out into hurricanes and it was I that got drenched to the core, not my camera's.
Lumix full frame cameras have some of the functions. Not all together in 1 body yet, but that’s a matter of time.
No need, because it is Olympus and M43.
I would love to see astrophotography features on cameras. Specifically smart stacking with options to either include or remove moving objects like satellites, meteors, planes, etc., and Star trails. It seems to me that these features could be added to a camera’s intelligent processing.
Pentax K1 had a good ability for astrophotography. I tried it a few times and it was pretty good out of the box for a guy that never tried it before. You'd think a new version would do well with that but Pentax is dead in the water.
Traditionally--before you guys were born, news agencies like AP and UPI issued their photographers not bigger and better cameras for these events, but smaller and easier cameras to keep in their pockets to capture the unexpected candid moments in side events or parties or crowds. The little Olympus cameras come to mind in this regard. Pro journalism photographers all got the newest issue of this level camera, and as a retailer 30 some odd years ago, I sold a ton of these as a result. Everyone wanted the nifty professional pocket camera that reporters felt was good enough for magazines of the time like Life and Newsweek etc. So, given the new small, full frame cameras that have come out for influencers who will no doubt be at all the sporting events, what super compact full frame auto pocket cameras are going to surprise us and what would be their features and price--particularly given the marvelous retro Nikon Zf which I just bought for its amazing black and white features, focus and just all around cool vibe. Will something like that in a pocket Olympus style cool be arriving???
I just bought an immaculate Canon 1D Mkii (for $220). That was THE camera of the 2004 Athens Olympics. 220 dollars!!!
Yes, it's 8Mp and can't do high iso, but it's a beautiful tank of a camera. I virtually never use it, and maybe never will, but I just love owning it, knowing it was the best camera on the planet at one time.
I may buy an R1 in 2044 ($200??) but realistically I'll wait to see what the R5 Mkii offers. I think it may be all the camera I ever need in my lifetime.
Thanks guys for the video. As a can R5 user I have been really pleased with the camera and still bought it when everyone was ganging up on it after its launch. It still stands up today and in the real world the pictures count and this camera with RF glass is very impressive indeed. There is a but though, I'm not interested in the numbers now as they are pretty meaningless to all but a small percentage of actual buyers. What's important to me and many others I know for mu next purchase, is all the other stuff like reliability, durability, software updates to keep our investment current, internal storage, offloading images quicker, camera's being able to be online and transfer images in real time so when I get home my images are ready on my screen to edit or someone else can be doing it as the action happens. Improved dynamic range, user interface and of course AI technology which we all can't seem to get away from and is here whether we like it or not. These things are now much more important and I think the spec number war will still go on, but buyers will wake up and realised none of these things make much of a difference to the quality of our work anymore. The new R1 might give us a glimpse of some of these things, I can only dream! 🙂
I enjoy watching your videos and learning new things. I have been using a Nikon D610 and D750. The results I'm getting are excellent in my opinion. The newer cameras are more expensive, but the picture quality isn't significantly better.
The selling features of the new sports cameras are autofocus and frame-rate. IQ comes from the lens.
I really find it so cute that you are all about a pre capture thingy and sell it as the latest greatest which Olympus had it for ages and even better implemented. Just a note….
I'd like the Z9 to do pre-capture in RAW, even if it's only low FPS.
How can it do pre-capture in RAW, if it cannot even save its settings in body (memory), but can only do it to card slot [1]!
On my wishlist for the : Sony A7iv + 200-600mm : ✓Animal eye tracking in video ✓Beter stabilisation in video and photo ✓ That the info you see on the lcd+viewfinder automatically rotates as you turn the camera vertical. So the info is at the bottom of your screen again and not on the left or right side.
My Z8 will do me for this lifetime!!!!
I don't believe it will do you for a lifetime. You will succump to the marketing hype and upgrade then sell your Z8 online. It happened to me with one of my Sony's I said I would keep forever . But the marketing hype got me.
@@MrLensheadalways happens
Would love to know where you think the OM-1 fits in for Wildlife. I am really attracted to their lower weight, pre-capture, their 150-400 lens, as well as their built-in extender and ND filters.
Remember when photography vlogs talked about, you know, photos? Despite years of GAS, most photographers are not exploiting the full potential of their gear, which saddens me 😢
I know. Talking about gear pays the bills though, and everyone wants to talk gear... These fast paced YT videos almost force it
@@nafnaf0 I think you've hit the nail on the head, confirmed by even a casual scan of viewership figures. Though personally, I still prefer a more photo-oriented approach, since there really are many topics of general interest that would improve the way we use our gear e.g. locations, composition, lighting. Unless these are mastered first, the gear won't be used to its full potential. And since few of us upgrade our systems every few months, the new gear videos are of dubious utility. For this reason, I tend to confine my views to vlogs that include actual example of the craft, even if in the context of new gear.
@@wellingtoncrescent2480 well put
I really want to see a new Sony A1ii because I want to see the price drop on the current A1 😁 I have to admit that my A7R3 does everything I need, but I really like the specs on the current A1.
Why would anyone build the best camera ever? If manufacturers did that, they would go out of business. They need to amaze us with new products every couple of years.
They wouldn't (build the best). That's why it´s called marketing.
Exactly. It's called planned obsolescence
Simple answer: They build the best ever camera now. Then, in a couple of years, they build another camera that is even better. The best camera now becomes a pretty good camera, but not the best. In other words, progress continues. Just because something is the best thing ever right now doesn’t mean that all further development and efforts at improvement must come to a halt.
They build the best camera that the current technology allows at the time.
Well, for us “amateurs”, IMHO, the Nikon Z8 is a pretty damn good camera for most anything I need…especially as firmware updates make it even better. And “20 FPS Raw/130 FPS JPG limiting”?? I think not, as I’m not a “spray & pray” kinda guy!
Yeah you can brute force the auto focus by having a faster processor or have a smaller area on the sensor(apsc).
This is a very nice info in case i would need a very stick autofocus on my z9 on video. I just go apsc
I agree Chelsea the A1ii should have better connectivity and an updated screen like the 7R5!
I have a 3'x2' print from my 6MP Pentax K100d Super still hanging as crisp as anything from a 1' viewing distance. It has been diminishing returns ever since. I hope these camera companies can adopt a more sustainable business model since it would be great to have them around to support their gear in future.
The best camera in the world is one that is modular to one's needs. Plain and simple.
I want a Z9 body, but with the sensor of the Zf for example since I don't need high MP and the recording media would the UHS-II standard (or CFExpress). Make it custom at the consumer's price point, might have to wait extra time to build it, but it'll be what the consumer wants.
That's how you make be the best camera in the world. At the behest of the consumer's desires and price point.
I have been considering upgrading to the z8 (currently shoot with a d850) but I'm on the fence still. You guys are teaching me a lot! Thanks!
Z9 flash sync is 1/200 and not 1/160 as stated. Slight difference.
From a Sony shooter. Both of your predictions of A9III before the A1 II was dead on. Sony gave a big surprise at 120 fps at 24MP but also a big surprise with the price tag. Tony's pre-capture prediction was also on the money. The A9 III seems to be an all-in camera for sports shooters. We're wildlife shooters primarily. I'm not sure what the A9 III has to offer wildlife shooters that would be consider an upgrade from the A1. The A1's 50 MP image allows for much better cropping. Combined with 30 fps, we're killing enough hard drive space as it is. Also, as of now, it doesn't appear that Sony has allowed any field testing with a 600 4.0, 400 2.8 or anything that would give wildlife shooters an idea of how the A 9 III performs under real-life conditions. What the A1 II might offer is baffling to many of us. I think the pre-capture feature is a given. Probably a similarly configured tilt screen, as well. 40 fps? 100 MP? As mentioned, we're killing enough hard drive space with the A1's current capabilities. When we bought our A1's, we said that this REALLY was the last camera we'd ever own. Until Sony comes up with a camera with the A1's capabilities that also sees in the dark, we think we'll stick to that pledge. 😊
How about in-body file/folder management, so that any HDR / Focus Bracketed / Exposure Bracketed shots go into user defined folders on the storage card automatically, without the photographer needing to go into the Yellow menu to hop backwards and forwards to select the active folder to use?
Based on Tony's commentary at 12:30 Man how cool would it be to have professional camera, that takes a M.2 2230 NVME drive that you can self upgrade and then backup shoot to a V90+ memory card as well.
The R5 is all I need! Anything above $4,000 for a camera body is unattainable for me.
Maybe when the used R1 cameras drop by half will I consider one.
Maybe you need a second hog
You never have to wait until the new, top of the line camera, drops to half as there are already old, top of the line cameras, that have dropped by half.
Waiting for R3 used prices to drop when the R1 comes out.
Why does the sidebar for guesses about the R1 say “A1 spec guesses?” It seems a bit late to be guessing what the a1 specs will be.
Well yea I know I'm going to get it but , I've had the nikon 800e and 600 for awhile, a few years ago ( don't hurt me ) I switched it all out for MFT. PANASONIC G9 and Olympus em-1 mark ii. I'm having a blast. Hope it all works out, and comments on MFT. No, it not going anywhere so leave that one out.Haha thank you for ALL your videos so informative.
"We lose the joy of what we have by always wanting more". I find I'm enjoying my M8 and M9 more than the much more advanced Q2 and SLS that have recently been acquired.
I think either one of them will sport a global shutter soon thus getting rid of the mechanical shutter completely = less dynamic range but not a problem for sports shooters. Plus professional video cameras have huge sensors with global shutters already (and big dynamic range). And since all the other stuff seems to have already been developed, thus RnD is already paying off, a global shutter would be the way to go imho.
First off let me say this. All three of the big companies Canon Sony and Nikon are all very good. I will admit I am biased because I am a lifetime Canon shooter. I use my R3 for sports only and I pair it with the RF 1200mm and my EF 400mm f/2.8 along with my EF 70-200mm f/2.8 everything you've talked about sounds pretty good. The only last thing I will still purchase for my arsenal will be the RF 100-300mm F/2.8. If Canon were to make a new lens I wish it would be a (100-400mm F/2.8) that would be the GODZILLA of all sports lenses. And as far as the R1 goes I will purchase one. But of course I will wait for the reviews. And even though I shoot Sports on a regular basis throughout the summer and return to the studio to do other shooting during the winter months, if the R1 is more than what I truly need. I'll consider not buying it. Or at the very least wait to the price comes down. Because honestly the Canon R3 is quite capable of doing everything and more than I need right now. 24 megapixels does great for when my photos are converted to posters and if there's not enough pixel per square inch I just go into Photoshop and adjust that. Because remember sometimes you could be a great photographer with a subpar camera and still get a great shot. Or you could be a crappy photographer with the best equipment and get a crappy shot. And one last thing I'm holding on to my EF 70-200mm F/2.8 and the reason is is because I will prefer a 70-200 with internal zoom. Because my current EF glass works just fine. The only people who pixel peep are other photographers so it's hard for me to buy into the RF system as a whole right now.
for you yes. For wildlife photographers, the R3 is lacking.
Or you can be a great photographer with the best equipment.
Would love for you guys to review the Pixii Rangefinder camera, it's a pricey one but I've been on the edge of my seat thinking about purchasing one.
Great video 🙏 Psyched about the Sony 300mm 2.8 G Master you mentioned, heard it'll be as light as their GM 70-200 ii 2.8 (under 3lbs). Perfect for 🦉at night. $7k 😭 but that's better than $12k for the GM 400mm 2.8 which weighs over 6lbs. Will be perfect w/my A7iv but ideally would get A7Siii for video.🦉🌛 a girl can dream.
The faster the shutter or the sensor scan the more banding you will get not less. Photograph a monitor to replicate what I mean. With led lights shooting events I got banding on the D3s and the Z9 going over 1/640.
Sony and their CFexpress type A... I think they will stick to it, not only because its smaller which goes well with their small camera bodies, they are also important for enthusiasts as it shares interface with SD cards. And with decent buffer even SD card is enought for most people (meaning more potential customers for them,)
Not everyone is willing or able to spend 2000$ (or more) on two memory cards. At least in my country its really just on the 80-160GB cards that type A is significantly more expensive (higher capacity is just around 10-15% more for type A card of same capacity from same manufacturer here, low capacity can be easily double the price) and if you buy those low capacity, you might almost run out of space on them sooner than you run out of buffer with SD V60 card.
By being able to use both CFExpress and SD in a same slot, unlike many other cameras, they can also have both slots supporting same cards even outside flagship (they dont do it, did on A7RV and hopefully this will become standard in a future). You loose advantage of super fast CFExpress B if you use second card as a backup and it happens to be SD card anyway.
And as for the speed, when PCI-e 4.0 (or 5.0 which is already present in computers, including PCI-e 5.0 SSDs) at last comes to mirrorless world (btw that would be an improvement I would love to see in A9 III or A1 II) you wont have any problems or limitations with speed on type A either
Great video... but there is no way Nikon names their flagship the Z1. 😁 Just doesn't make sense with their current nomenclature. I think it will be something new like they did with the ZF. Maybe the ZP for "Pro"
PRO CAPURE. Already have it. And, you can select how many pre and post frames you want (with good limits, not like the Nikon).
The best camera...until the next one....and then the next one. You can take portraits with a Canon EOS R or 5D MK IV for the next decade and no one will know. No one prints things larger than 8x10 anymore. It is all on their social media. Sports can all be done with the R6. Yes there are higher resolution cameras that offer 6K etc. but who actually uses it outside a small, small handful? If you know what you are doing you can create magic with a 10+ year old camera.
sure it can be done on an r6, but it is much more professionally efficient to use better cameras, so you dont miss as many shots
@@johannvantassel4604 I've used, as a professional, two R6 cameras for sports and portrait work and in that time I have not missed many shots and those that I have were on me for not paying attention. You can jam as many things as you want into new camera but there's no need for more than 20 pixels or 4k 60 video unless you are making movies for Hollywood and even then it is only for specialized shots where you need better than 4k 60.
As for "professional work"...what does that mean? I can roll up on a job with my old 5d IV and make just as much money as with my R6...and I make good $$$ doing what I do and many I know who make more use that same combo.
Just look at the continued deterioration of the SLR market...there is nothing coming out that is an absolute "must have." We've pretty much reached the pinnacle.
@@johannvantassel4604 also...the real problem isn't missing shots it's 1) having too many good ones to choose from when 99% are sharp and in focus now and 2) competing with the iPhone crowd who are happy with "good enough" for their Instagram with the push of one button.
Agree and disagree.
It depends what you want to achieve. For portrait or inside a studio, I totally agree with your comment. An old DSLR will do the job perfectly. But I went for a safari recently and used the R5 which I compared with my 5D Mark IV, just the autofocus is a game changer for fast moving subjects. So once again, it depends what you want to achieve. Of course you can still use the R6 which is cheaper but the higher resolution on new models makes it easier to crop. Overall agree with your comments, a lot of new camera bring new things that we don’t always need (like shooting 8K video when you are a still photographer or just make 4k video is enough). I do believe that some models can make a big difference though (personally I’m waiting for the R5 Mark II to see how it is).
Q passed 📸👍✅
Why doesn’t Olympus have a full frame sensor? They did on the film OM-1 & 2!
I hope the R1 implements wifi 7. This will allow near gigabit up/download speeds without being tethered.
Releasing a Z1 makes no sense. A Z9 Mark II makes more sense and sort of goes along with what the Z6/Z7 at least have been doing. A "Z1" would indicate a rather limited camera, something of "lessor" specs than even the Z5..... Or if Nikon is to release it and call it the "Z One" (not use the numeral one, but the world "One"). However z9 mark II sort of fits what you are suggesting the next high-end camera from Nikon might be. But I'm also thinking the other way, like the Z6 III and Z7 III (perhaps those will come first, and then the "Z1" or Z9 Mark II will be the end of next year... But this all being said , I won't bother myself. I just picked up the z8 a few months ago and that's more than enough camera for me. I wouldn't really benefit any from a z9 (or a Z1) or any other high-end pro body since I personally don't shoot much paid work (and this is more or less a hobby, the only paid jobs I do are odd headshot and group shot jobs here and there but those basically just pay for the hobby). I'd rather take the extra money and go on a vacation to be honest, or invest in lenses if I need any.
Ehh... Both Sony and Canon have bodies with lower numbers that are more capable than cameras with higher numbers, and Sony even has the A9 which is more capable than the A7 series but less capable than the A1.
@@sasca854 Yes true, but in the case of Canon, they designed their numbering scheme to be that way. And the A1 is in a separate class (Sony treated the A1 as a new breed of camera and the others the A9 and A7 are not of the same "breed" as the A1 basically). Nikon's numbering works the other way of Canon's (larger numbers = more power cameras, whereas Canon is lower numbers = more power cameras). In reality I think that everything in the Nikon line-up should have been shifted down two numbers (so a Z5 would be a Z3, a Z6 is a Z4, etc) to leave room a true Z9 or have a Z8 and Z9 which woulid have been true pro-bodies (the current z8 would thus have been a Z7). Because on the low-end I don't know what Nikon would have done wit ha Z1 - Z4 to be honest... mabe an EVFless version of the Z30 but FF, and maybe a range finder style FF body like the Fuji X-E series... but that's two of the four slots that would be filled. However it does make sense that for Sony an A9 III would be coming, as the A1 is more of a long-term camera (per Sony I believe). Anyways they're just names. I'm more interested in the specs....
Did you guys shot this in 8K? looks spectacular! First time I see this insane quality on your posts! cheers! ;)
Thanks for these good scoop. I remembered paying 12K(CDN) for a 1DC back in 2013! R1 may be priced between 8.5 to 9.5K(USD). Would like to see : Global Shutter / SDI In-Out / Timecode / 1500 to 2000 nits screen / Dual CFX / Dual ISO and more. They should come out with the R1 and a R1C. I would by the R1C.
I wonder how long it will take for someone to create an AI model that removes flicker banding 🤔. Should be very easy to train, just take a photo without it, artificially add in some bands, then train it on with vs without.
didn't know you watch photography content. Do you have a camera and if so which one(s)? also what lenses?
The new sony that just released will have no banding!
time caught up with this rapidly
What about an R3 Mk2 Just turning up the wick on 20-30MP camera very specifically for sports with blazing speed and built in 4/5G upload, still keeping the R1 branding back until they can do it justice with high res and high speed and quad pixel.
For the Olympics, a R3 Mark II would probably make more sense from purely rational and practical point of view. But that's not how marketing works, unfortunately. So there is more likely going to be a R1 trying to be the best for everything which is never really the case.
Pro-capture has been on Olympus cameras since forever.
I think, with such expensive and bulky cameras, sim card tray would be a good option. An SSD memory on board for super fast shooting.
I do a lot of studio photography and I cannot see where the Z9 is limited to 1/60th sync speed. In the studio I mostly shoot at 1/160th and 1/200th of a second with flash and it works perfectly fine. And with modern flashes like Profotos B10, A2 or A10 you can easily use HSS up to 1/xxxx of a second. Your statement about the 1/60th sync speed is misleading at least...
They should also think for the cricket world cup.. They need to bring out their equipment for this major world event too.. they should have brought out these earlier for this cricket world cup..
Unless you're with Getty Images, "no agencies" at the Olympics anymore. Same with the Tokyo Games a few years ago. International news-wire services (such as the Associated Press, Reuters, Agence France Presse, etc) are still in, but that's about it. If you're a contributing shooter for a picture library agency, no go... and freelance sports shooting generally doesn't pay much unless you can achieve better-than-normal editorial rates for the use of your images. Traditional shoot/sell methods aren't working the way they used to for independent (freelance) photographers, although this has been the case for a number of years. "The freelancer will die", as a colleague has been known to say. The same for freelance writing.
Ich habe immer noch eine Sony Alpha 7R 2 😅Aber die funktioniert hervorragend und 45 MP in RAW sehen gut aus plus Sigma und Gmaster Objektive ❤
I hope Sony a7c series can get a full mechanical shutter and Sony add in-camera raw conversion in their bodies.
I know it’s not a sports camera, but the A7siii would be in line for an update before the A1, and after the A9ii.
Plus, to not piss off their A1 owners, they will get a little more life out of it before the upgrade. The issue is, the A9iii maybe be a better camera than the A1. I guess we’ll soon see!
Don't forget the other big white lenses for anyone shooting broadcast or video- Fuji and their industry standard astronomically expensive broadcast zooms. Okay, they're technically pearl and green not white and red, but still.
I'm waiting and hoping for a mirror less d500 replacement. All their latest cameras have been full frame ! Do you think we will see one anytime soon?
Look at an OM-1 you might be surprised
Panasonic had "pre-release" long ago. Was basically 6k video broken into a group of individual files for each video frame
I would love to see you guys in France, I'll make you visit ! ;)
I don't get it. What's the big difference between 1/60th strobe sync vs 1/100th? Is it really worth it for Nikon or the consumers to get a mechanical shutter? It's fair enough if YOU know why, I just feel like you left out the reason for it. The R&D involved with re-implementing a mechanical shutter into a system that's now non-mechanical shutter is gonna ruin the business case.
1/100th? I think you misheard. They said the Sony has 1/400th sync speed. My R5 has 1/200th and my 5DMIV has 1/250th. Using flash you typically want to lesson or eliminate the effect of dailight on your exposure. If you can't use a shutterspeed quicker than 1/60, you would have to use a crazy high f-stop or a dark grad filter.
@@jimgsewellit's 1/160
@@amermeleitor Nikon lists it at 1/200 - 1/250 depending on the strobe.
@@jimgsewell Whatever it is, they don't really explain what the problem is
@@jimgsewell For me the lack of shutter is a plus, given the stacked sensor. I hope a camera without a shutter may live forever and I can still use it when I am 150 years old.
Would love to see a Pentax K-O, sport-centric DSLR. 😆
Viewfinder and display needs to be OLED/ High dynamic range.
What camera did you use to record this video? great work from you. thanks
Global shutter would also be the holy grail of video cameras. And readout speeds is going to be where the game will be changed.
I agree with Chelsea, I want my cameras to be easy to connect to WiFi & Bluetooth and work easily with the cloud and phones. They really need to do something to streamline workflow.
You make valid points on today's challenges of connectivity but things evolve and I think solutions will be found that will allow a more seamless workflow with cameras. What I do know is that the current camera workflow sucks in comparison with phone workflow. The apps for a camera are so clumsy and frustrating to use that I don't even bother to try anymore. Getting a single picture from my camera to my phone or the cloud should be as easy as a press of a button. Photographer's expectations evolve and push the envelope of what can be done; the manufacturers that fulfil those expectations will survive.
What camera was used for this video? The video is 1080P but looks like its 4K WOW
Nikon hasn't had a #1 name on their camera since the D1 and then went up to the D6 from there for their flagships. I doubt the z9 is the equivalent of what Sony has with the A9 so I really think the Z9 is the flagship that Nikon poured all their resources into as hail Mary to win back their audiences and they did that well, but it certainly is their flagship. I don't see a Z1 anywhere in the horizon and I think we will see a Z9 mark 2 o probably before that. I'm interested to see what canon does here with the R1. I'm an R3 and R6 owner and I'm definitely looking to update the R6 and I'm not sure if it will be the R1 or the R5 mark 2 at this point. Either way I'm excited.
I’m thinking a Z9S
Cameras should have mvme ssds in them and there processors should have the pcie channels at least 8 lanes
CFExpress is basically ssd. B type has a converter you can plug a 2280 ssd into the slot with.A type needs a cable based adapter
Nobody makes a 500 f4 or 200-400 f4 with built in tc! Strange. Would love to see Canon come out with some newer lenses with DO optics. LOVE what Nikon is doing in the wildlife space. All that PF tech is fantastic. Sony needs to update their 200-600 with a better AF motor and better IS (see Canon's 100-500), Canon needs a 600mm variable aperture zoom to compete with Nikon & Sony. Nobody has a 300 f4 prime yet either. Love that Canon took a risk on the 1200mm, I'd love to see more manufacturers take risks like that.
200-600 2.8-4😅
The R7 and some other bodies already have a precapture option, I cant see them releasing an R1 or anR5ii without it now
I just bought a new a6700 . First I set it to 10bit, XAVC S 5K, 60P. The videos didn't play on my computer. Then I brought down the bit rate 8. Now it plays on my computer but not on my TV. What is the solution?
Loved the camera confab. Great to watch. 👍😊🇮🇪🇺🇸
I think is time to give us a 100mp camera. A R1s or something that replace my 5ds and I know the r5 is kind of there, but I still get better results in studio with my 5ds. Anyway, a high end MP body with sport features to shoots fast etc. I would pay $8k for it. But, they could take out the video fancy specs to make it a more photo camera for the same price of the R3.
Is there any Canon high end camera that does not have an overheating & Auto Focusing issues?
How about moving the focus button to the back?
Love my Nikon Z8!
Just some nitpicking feedback here: The white slider at the right is getting in and out too fast and/or too often. I can't read it if it's moving that fast, and because you also move your face which is very distracting. I rather see you put your face at the left and THEN move in the slider (without moving your face) so i can continue to look at the video without having to track your face.
Or just put the specs as an overlay at the bottom.
I somehow think, there will be a Z9II and it is their flagship and I would be fine with that. Then again I have never used it. But I will soon be switching from R5 to the Z8 :-)
Before waiting for at least the R5 Mark II? That'll come out before the R1. I would compare them first before switching.
Oh my. The current mainstream cameras are already ridiculously effective. My a7r4 is just spectacular. Yes, some things could be better. The r5 might be in my future. But as I don’t work for Sports Illustrated, who needs this? Having been shooting for 50 years, we are already in nerd heaven.
Lol, the way she says ship with the flag. 😂😂😂
I want to see a surprise release from Fuji GFX with telescopic zoom lenses and new body with lower MPs.
stacked sensor 50MP at 50fps would make the r1 a big hit. anything less not interesting. r6ii can do 40fps and its not stacked so not as fast readout, so i dont see why a faster readout camera cant do 50fps
@jmventertainment7component shutter would be better
The electronic shutter of the R6II has a bit of distortion at certain angles. The balls instead of being round are slightly oblong. I rather have a higher mechanical frame rate to avoid distortion. Unless the R1 could solve the distortion problem with the electronic shutter.
@jmventertainment7 I like the idea, but can it be realistic for a sports photographer with 50MP? Will they be able to create enough though put for fast fps?
Great video Guys! Thanks. I think your predictions are pretty much right on. What’s kind of frustrating with Nikon right now is they can’t even get some of their products in stock. The 400/f2.8 is like Bigfoot… widely talked about, but rarely seen. It’s been backordered for months and months.
Sony is apparently developing a camera with an Android based OS, which if successful might help neutralize the complaint about that company’s lack of firmware updates.
Olympus came out with pre release capture before nikon
Olympus? Bahaha 😂
That’s like saying that Yugo’s had the first air bags.
@@bngr_bngrLOL. You could carry an inflated or two balloons in the back of the Yugo.
@@bngr_bngr That's why I always chose Ladas
if you don't try, you'll never know
get ready everyone, one of these companies is going to pay these two a lot of money. They are going to tell you all about how great this camera is.
I can't imagine any event on earth that I couldn't successfully cover with my 1991 M6.
would love to see pre- and post- capture.
Look at an OM-1 and see how much the ProCap feature can be tailored
@@kenwiberg6517yeah, really do love how the om-1 handles it. I hope canon copies it, heh
What about a z500 to replace d500 consumer affordable sports camera advertised at the Olympics and hinted at that it’s used at 2024?
Action cameras are nice. How's the landscape ? Portraits ? Macro ? Low Light ? Is L series lens the answer ? More light bigger aperture ?
How about a control dial with automatic settings that actually work so well that professional photographers prefer it over manual settings?
Love your videos long time. But, what about my Olympus. I have the M1 III, they have the OM-1, I won't upgrade till I hear about an OM-1 Mark II.
What's the benefit of a flagship to a retired photographer, advanced amateur, serious user, that costs $5,000+. Tell me about a ML camera that has the speed, features, weight, costs, dual hi speed memory cards, good VF and LCD, etc., that my Olympus has. 32mp is fine, but maybe 35mp is better.
Also, as I have mentioned before, each company needs to have an APSC body with the same features as their advanced amateur bodies. The R7 comes close, but no cigar. APSC mode on a large mp, 45+ camera.
FPS, you are discussing. Olympus already has 60 and 120 FPS max.
Any Pentax Full Frame news? 👀
Eye autofocus and quad pixel AF are technologies that Canon has been working on for a long time. Couple that with stacked sensor speed and pro capture and you have just about everything you need for sports photography. Very tough to implement though and I think Canon is holding off because they have not perfected these technologies well enough to warrant the moniker of R1.
The Olympics (Winter/Summer)come along every few years & get heavy media coverage.
I have a difficult time thinking any major camera mfr can miss introducing a new flagship body. Especially Canon as they're already lagging Sony.
I haven't really been keeping up really, but what about the A7S IV? Is that a thing or has it been announced already?
"A1 spec guesses" shows on your list of guesses when talking about... R1 !! 😉
Do you think there will be a time when they could speak to their editors on the camera?
Nikon should produce the Z9. With a 100 maga pixel sensor. Which would wipe the floor with Hasselblad. The full frame achieves a better depth of field. Much faster lenses. They can use higher ISO levels. Even before a grain texture starts to become visible. Increased number of frames per second. Video capability. Etcetera and so on.
Its actually going to be the R0 global shutter and global sensor.
Lol man...as a cinematographer/videographer who dabbles in most types of still photography, my expectations are always fairly ridiculous.
I want a mirrorless body but tons of buttons, big bright screen, global shutter, 12K RAW video (even if only downsampled 4K ProRes 4:4:4:4 internally), 15+ stops of usable video dynamic range, and 40+mp stills. Full frame would be nice, ofc, but for decent stabilization and frame rates over 25p, I'm ok with a 1.6x crop in 6K. 120 fps is more than enough. 30fps still bursts is fine, if 5/6 are in focus, and there's a prerelease option 😁
Lol. OH! And, reliable human-eye-tracking autofocus, obvi. So basically an upgraded FX9 with no loss to image quality in a cutting edge mirrorless body lol.
I'm only half-joking, here, tbh. The tech is getting there...
I currently use the XH2s as my mirrorless cine/vid/stills cam, and I rent the FX9 a lot, and the combo is making it tough for me to get excited for new mirrorless releases.