Coming from an f-body fan/owner, I LOVE my Challenger R/T. I'd choose the Challenger 392 over the Camaro SS any day of the week. My Challenger is a daily driver, and it always puts a smile on my face.
The Challenger just looks so good. It's 2023 and it still looks amazing. The lastest models still have the same shape. Yes, an enthusiast will recognize every change but it's basically looks like it did when it came back in 08. And yhat's good.
I'm a Mustang fan and I do agree that the Challenger is better as a daily, more comfortable, looks retro, better visibility and a straightup muscle car. But, After losing to a few 6th Gen SS's.. The SS has better performance no doubt about it. These guys are obviously comparing comfort over performance.. in that case, go buy a Honda Accord Sedan.
Rrd T I'm 6'02" and have a 2SS Camaro and find its very comfortable. No sight issues which I think is something that's blown way out of proportion by guys that don't own one. I think the Challenger is decent looking, but obviously I think the SS is way better looking lol. I had a Charger before and honestly it had too many problems including pulling out almost the entire interior including dash to fix some electrical gremlin. Of course once I got it back it was all creaks n groans ugh nightmare. IMO that's Dodge's biggest problem. Reliability. You hear it from guys that own em so if you wanna plop down a ton of cash that's all you lol.
Ray Rocco well, I can tell you why they choose the Charger cruisers over the Taurus it because it's bigger. I'm a cop and our agency has Taurus, Explorers and the remaining Crown Vic's. I still have a Crown Vic (thank god lol). The Taurus is ok for smaller guys, but way too small for bigger guys. Plus the trunk isn't huge and my friends that have them have trunks stuffed to near overflowing. There have been no chronic issues with them mechanically. I wish they were bigger because all striped up they look cool. For most agencies these decisions on manufacturers are made by city hall. We wanted to go with Tahoe's, but they got slightly less mpg than the Explorer (not too mention that now GM has jacked the price on them and even agencies nearby that were buying them aren't anymore). Don't think that police departments can just say this is what we are getting cuz it doesn't work that way. I still remember the Chevy Impala (the previous smaller ones) fiasco with ours where they shoved em down our throats because they got better mpg than the Crown Vic. After cycling some in it quickly became apparent that they were much too small, too slow and issues where cages weren't fitting well where you could reach an arm through them lol. So they stopped getting them and had to yank ones one the street, remove the cages and issue them to sgt's and detectives. All politics man.
Ray Rocco thank you. Like I said, I don't have a choice in what cruiser I get. Chargers aren't in widespread use in my area although the highway patrol contracted for em. I've had a Charger and a Ram truck in the last 15 years and both had lots of problems. People I know have Chargers and Challengers and they've all got their share too. My buddy has a newer Ram truck and he's not really had any issues with that. Don't get me wrong, the classic Mopars of the late 60s early 70s are my favorite classic muscle cars, but it'll be a long time til I buy a newer Dodge car that's for sure lol. A lot of 80s n 90s GMs sucked (I've had an early 80s Z28 and an early 90s Firebird that both had lots of issues), but this 17 Camaro SS I bought a few months ago is tight n right lol. The build quality honestly seems to be as good as the BMW I traded in on it.
i really want either of these 2 cars. Im waiting for the challenger T/A or Camaro SS 1LE. Camaro is a serious track performer that will run laps around a challenger any day all day. But that muscle car spirit of the challenger holds a very special place in my heart, its a straight line warrior, and its much more practical car. its gonna be hard for me to choose :(
Charger? Yea ok. The charger is a paper weight in the race world. And the interior is cheap you get about as much room in the chargers backs seats as you do in a challenger and it weighs more with the same hp which equals slow and the challenger itself is slower than the stock 455 hp Camaro. Love challengers look don't get me wrong but it's definitely the slower of mustang and Camaro. And if you getting a muscle car for looks rather then performance you're a pussy and shouldn't own either specially if you getting them for space and comfort. Their race cars not family cars. Smh
@@PsalmMiracle With that logic, people should get used Vettes (C6 Z06 and up) and call it a day. Other than the 2 small butt shelves and an extra inch or 2 of ground clearance, the performance of a 6th gen SS and a base C6 Z51 are quite similar in acceleration and cornering.
I have never heard of the clutch being "stiff" in other Camaro reviews. Also as a side note, GM made the new Camaro as a direct competitor to the M4, C63s AMG, and the RS5. All European sports cars. Don't compare the two as muscle cars, as the Camaro has left that scene and has definitely grown up.
What's funny is they both have the exact same tremec manual transmission in both of them but one shifts like butter...Lol🤣. The old man didn't like the spring on the clutch pedal it is a little stiffer than the Challenger. I got rid of my Challenger because it became rather boring after a year or two. I now own the Camaro 2SS 1LE it's not a cruiser it's a sports car and it hasn't got boring yet! I just go through tires quickly 🤣 $$😢 but so fun 👍
They should've kept it a muscle car. Imo nothing beats a chevy camaro 1967. A true old school classic of the muscle cars. I like the challenger way better because it pays homage to the classic ones.
Awesome cars. Nice to see a review based more on day to day performance instead of track or canyon carving. Those are great buy for the majority of people buying these they want to drive them often.
I also like the challenger more. Just because it's bigger. Performance wise, I would be happy with either. Unfortunately, GM refuses to offer bigger performance cars anymore. Chrysler has about 5 or more models with plenty of room and more than 400hp.
The styling of the Camaro had always been a favourite for me. The only huge downside for me is its dashboard, I just hate that the instrument panel just 'pops' up out of the dash, its just too bad. I did go and test drove a Challenger srt, and cannot wait to pick it up next week!
No comparison, I traded in my challenger srt for an SS and haven't looked back. I'm more than satisfied with my camaro. The hardest part for me is not driving it to work and piling up mileage. It's all up to the individual though, one of my partners traded his SS for a 392 ( dumb trade imo) and he loves it.
These cars are legendary! The heritage that comes with these pony cars is stuff of legends! As long as Ford, Chevy, Dodge are around, these types of monsters will keep tearing up the streets!
Is it me or is it that people forget the Corvette has been out much longer and has an extreme racing history? Did they forget the Vette b/c they don't care for it or is it b/c it is in such another class (above) that we don't bother mentioning it amongst the 3 pony/muscle cars?
I think it should have been noted that the 6.4L challenger is also available in the Scat Pack variant. The SRT is at a higher price point due to the larger piston brakes, suspension differences, wider wheels and a few more things. Its confusing when you say the challenger is $50k when you can pick up the scat pack for in the high $30k
I purchased a new Camaro SS in 2010 and it felt like I was in a submarine, it had horrible visibility. The new Camaros do not look retro enough either. I love how true the Challenger is to the 1970 model year, and it has WAY better visibility. I will say the Camaro was a thrill to drive with the six speed manual transmission, however, I got rid of it after six months because I just did not like the poor visibility...
Challenger 8-speed over the camaro and mustang manual or auto anytime. Maybe when the 10 speed is available for the other two I'll change my mind. Having driven all three the challenger is the more satisfying car.
@@richgirlappeal Not sure if my reply means anything to you anymore but I'd personally go with the Camaro. While I thinks its slightly uglier, I prefer smaller, lighter cars and I like the tighter interior of the Camaro more than the SUV-like space of the Challenger. With that said, I got a C6 Vette and the a beater hatchback as my combo. Sports car for most days and the hatchback for practicality needs and extreme percipitation
Wow that surprises me. The Mopar gets almost 4mpg more than the SS and has 30hp over it , that says a lot for the 3gen hemi mill but especially considering the wt dif. The chally is true to its muscle car roots but both the SS and GT are euro style of cars
I heard that theres a stereotype when joining the army that you buy either a camero of challenger with the bonus check that comes with an I believe 4 or 5 year contract. So naturally, im checking out my options xD
ohhhhh I love that Challenger... the 392 SRT is what I want again.... because why spend the EXTRA 20-25 GRAND for the hell cat powertrain........I miss my 2012 SRT.. but the new one.. Ugh GOD my pants are getting warm.....now.. would be nice if I could get a job like you folks have :P
I turned away from the SS because they made it a complete sports car. Almost no one will ever take their Camaro on the track. I'd like it if it was a little bit bigger.
I have a 2019 Challenger R/T. I wish I had a 392, but even the 345 is fun. Both the Camaro and the Challenger are amazing cars, and I will seriously look into the Camaro SS the next time I'm shopping for a car.
Not sure if my reply means anything to you know, but have you considered a used C6 or C7 Vette? In my opinion if you have the space, a used Vette and a beater hatchback would make a great combo all year round. A 6th gen SS is similar to a base C6 but the Vette has more trunk space and is "more special" if you care for that sort of thing
Gutsy review. I see much hate in the comment thread. On a side note: I had a choice between a Camaro and a Challenger and went with a challenger because it fits taller people better and is a more comfortable daily driver.
not hating on the dodge but if im looking at 2dr sports cars i want the feel of a sports car that aggressive attack mode feeling if i was looking for comfort then i would just look at sport suv and remember weight does play a role when it comes to racing throwing high hp numbers at a lighter car = win.
Yeah, man. I am a Chevy guy! Peeking at my dad's 69 427 Vette at 5 years old. Always loved Camaros and Firebirds. But they have no idea how to market these cars. Ford's marketing is soooooo good. From the actual advertisements, to their pricing structures, to the value proposition they put their cars together with, Ford Mustangs are always a really good package that balance livability and performance.
Ok so i was thinking about getting my first sports car. I was debating between the challenger and the camero. Im just your everyday driverthat wants something reliable. Which one should i get? Don't be bias tho
lol no the HC already comes almost fully optioned, moonroof and auto trans is the only thing i can think of. if you see one close to 80k, its a huge dealer markup.
I can appreciate that Chevy did do a good job making the Camaro look good. But to me I just couldn’t justify driving one, something about it just doesn’t let me take it seriously
Blake Swan I tested the manual and loved it, but opted for the auto. My heart wanted the stick, but I've had surgeries on both shoulders and my back from injuries and had to think that over time, or if had more problems it could be a problem driving a lot with manual. Sometimes you gotta compromise I guess. I will say that auto in the SS is a good one. Buy what you like and enjoy it.
The auto in the new SS in simply fantastic. Extremely fast, feels great using the paddles. Faster in a straight line than the manual. And the ZL1 A10 is even faster... which is crazy and awesome.
Team Camaro. I prefer smaller, lighter and better handling cars. The Challenger is attractive and sounds very good, but I like the confinement of the Camaro's interior and the overall performance better. That said, I like the Corvette miles ahead of both of them and have a beater hatchback alongside it in case of practical needs or extreme percipitation.
I rarely saw a challenger in the 70's it was always a Camaro it was really America's choice it was back then and still is today who cares about visibility reduction on the Camaro you have 2 side mirrors rear Camera assistance if you can't see with these you shouldn't be driving.
Might wanna check out for mistakes, in the vid the guy said it's a 2016 challenger. But in stats board, it says 2017. It's a small one of course :p but still for later references
A challenger is a beast as long as it's not racing a Camaro or mustang or BMW. Other than that the only thing a challenger smokes is mustang's and astronauts.
A challenger is a beast as long as it's not racing a Camaro or mustang or BMW. Other than that the only thing a challenger smokes is Honda's and astronauts.
This probably sounds weird, but I never knew American muscle was so big in the hood. I like that. I'm white as can be and have always loved Camaros, Trans Ams, and Corvettes. We gotta band together, they keep making it harder and harder for the v8 lovers out there. As TI once said, "Chevy's all colors, man."
Have a Hellcat and drove a ZL1 some, my Hellcat, in a straight line, seeing as how I have a normal job and am not a professional driver, blows the doors off the ZL1.
justin bouche exactly. Which is weird. I don't like the challenger because of its white front end and that the IHS said the car is more liable to kill you in a front end crash or rollover.
lol, i was shocked when i saw the crash tests. the camaro and mustang both did great being small cars... the challenger (this behemoth) instead crushes the legs of its occupants.
justin bouche , wrong ! Not "hands down" in acceleration numbers. There are BONE STOCK 392 SP's & 392 SRT that run 12flat 1/4 miles, & 11.7's on DR's(no tune, no Boltons, just rear tire swap) I don't car who you are, if can't respect that then something's wrong with you..the SS mostly definitely wins as a sports car especially in the handling department. The SRT is clear a True Pure Muscle Car (not a sports car)
I don’t now much about pony car do please some one help me out : im looking for a track ,drag and daily driver which would be the better option zl1 gt500 or a challenger?
Everytime I see one of these drive by I ALWAYS get mixed up and think it's the other. The overall shape is the same. I'm not a car guy btw, I can never tell the difference with these
The gen6 SS is an outstanding Sports car, & the SRT Challenger is a Drip Sexy Pure American Muscle Car..both cars are bad ass at what they do
Yep
Coming from an f-body fan/owner, I LOVE my Challenger R/T. I'd choose the Challenger 392 over the Camaro SS any day of the week. My Challenger is a daily driver, and it always puts a smile on my face.
The Challenger just looks so good. It's 2023 and it still looks amazing. The lastest models still have the same shape. Yes, an enthusiast will recognize every change but it's basically looks like it did when it came back in 08. And yhat's good.
I went with a Dodge Challenger and I don't regret it
I went with both.
Kent Payne me too
I Love The Challenger
3:12
Me too. Wouldn't trade it for any Camaro.
I'm a Mustang fan and I do agree that the Challenger is better as a daily, more comfortable, looks retro, better visibility and a straightup muscle car. But, After losing to a few 6th Gen SS's.. The SS has better performance no doubt about it. These guys are obviously comparing comfort over performance.. in that case, go buy a Honda Accord Sedan.
Rrd T I'm 6'02" and have a 2SS Camaro and find its very comfortable. No sight issues which I think is something that's blown way out of proportion by guys that don't own one. I think the Challenger is decent looking, but obviously I think the SS is way better looking lol. I had a Charger before and honestly it had too many problems including pulling out almost the entire interior including dash to fix some electrical gremlin. Of course once I got it back it was all creaks n groans ugh nightmare. IMO that's Dodge's biggest problem. Reliability. You hear it from guys that own em so if you wanna plop down a ton of cash that's all you lol.
Ray Rocco well, I can tell you why they choose the Charger cruisers over the Taurus it because it's bigger. I'm a cop and our agency has Taurus, Explorers and the remaining Crown Vic's. I still have a Crown Vic (thank god lol). The Taurus is ok for smaller guys, but way too small for bigger guys. Plus the trunk isn't huge and my friends that have them have trunks stuffed to near overflowing. There have been no chronic issues with them mechanically. I wish they were bigger because all striped up they look cool. For most agencies these decisions on manufacturers are made by city hall. We wanted to go with Tahoe's, but they got slightly less mpg than the Explorer (not too mention that now GM has jacked the price on them and even agencies nearby that were buying them aren't anymore). Don't think that police departments can just say this is what we are getting cuz it doesn't work that way. I still remember the Chevy Impala (the previous smaller ones) fiasco with ours where they shoved em down our throats because they got better mpg than the Crown Vic. After cycling some in it quickly became apparent that they were much too small, too slow and issues where cages weren't fitting well where you could reach an arm through them lol. So they stopped getting them and had to yank ones one the street, remove the cages and issue them to sgt's and detectives. All politics man.
Ray Rocco thank you. Like I said, I don't have a choice in what cruiser I get. Chargers aren't in widespread use in my area although the highway patrol contracted for em. I've had a Charger and a Ram truck in the last 15 years and both had lots of problems. People I know have Chargers and Challengers and they've all got their share too. My buddy has a newer Ram truck and he's not really had any issues with that. Don't get me wrong, the classic Mopars of the late 60s early 70s are my favorite classic muscle cars, but it'll be a long time til I buy a newer Dodge car that's for sure lol. A lot of 80s n 90s GMs sucked (I've had an early 80s Z28 and an early 90s Firebird that both had lots of issues), but this 17 Camaro SS I bought a few months ago is tight n right lol. The build quality honestly seems to be as good as the BMW I traded in on it.
Rrd T But then you would be seen driving a Honda Accord sedan...I think you miss the point entirely.
Rrd T I feel u
The camaro with magnetic ride handling package is badass but grandpa is more concerned with comfort. He needs a Toyota Camry
john adams fuckin died 😂😂😂😂
And thats why my grandpa drives a 2015 camry its fast ive driven it. I think it has like 220 horsepower
The Challenger is much more than just comfortable.
@@user-dd9qq1ru7s I've driven a Camry it has power, hell even the sienna has some kick.
I like the Camaro design.
i really want either of these 2 cars. Im waiting for the challenger T/A or Camaro SS 1LE. Camaro is a serious track performer that will run laps around a challenger any day all day.
But that muscle car spirit of the challenger holds a very special place in my heart, its a straight line warrior, and its much more practical car.
its gonna be hard for me to choose :(
peKadoDeDioZ
same. Camaro for the track Challenger for the straight. I'm Mopar to the bone, wife likes Chevy, so might get one of each.
Both cars are badass. But I prefer the challenger. Molar for life
Initially I chose a dodge challenger as my dream car just for the look, but it honestly one of the best cars
I love how the older guy says he loves raw horsepower and then a minute later talks about comfort in the Camaro with the auto😂
The challenger/charger is the last muscle cars.
392Muscle muscle is garbage now that’s why Chevy and ford went into the sport car direction
Charger? Yea ok. The charger is a paper weight in the race world. And the interior is cheap you get about as much room in the chargers backs seats as you do in a challenger and it weighs more with the same hp which equals slow and the challenger itself is slower than the stock 455 hp Camaro. Love challengers look don't get me wrong but it's definitely the slower of mustang and Camaro. And if you getting a muscle car for looks rather then performance you're a pussy and shouldn't own either specially if you getting them for space and comfort. Their race cars not family cars. Smh
@@PsalmMiracle With that logic, people should get used Vettes (C6 Z06 and up) and call it a day. Other than the 2 small butt shelves and an extra inch or 2 of ground clearance, the performance of a 6th gen SS and a base C6 Z51 are quite similar in acceleration and cornering.
I have never heard of the clutch being "stiff" in other Camaro reviews. Also as a side note, GM made the new Camaro as a direct competitor to the M4, C63s AMG, and the RS5. All European sports cars. Don't compare the two as muscle cars, as the Camaro has left that scene and has definitely grown up.
What's funny is they both have the exact same tremec manual transmission in both of them but one shifts like butter...Lol🤣. The old man didn't like the spring on the clutch pedal it is a little stiffer than the Challenger. I got rid of my Challenger because it became rather boring after a year or two. I now own the Camaro 2SS 1LE it's not a cruiser it's a sports car and it hasn't got boring yet! I just go through tires quickly 🤣 $$😢 but so fun 👍
Who the fuck is going to buy a camaro over a m4, c63 or rs5? It’s a Chevy I don’t care how good of a sports car it is
They should've kept it a muscle car.
Imo nothing beats a chevy camaro 1967. A true old school classic of the muscle cars. I like the challenger way better because it pays homage to the classic ones.
John Jones 345 if someone has the option of getting an m4, c63, or rs5 you could bet your ass the last thing they’re gonna consider is a dodge.
@@Daniel-is1gp you'd be surprised
2 beautiful cars...I love them both.
Awesome cars. Nice to see a review based more on day to day performance instead of track or canyon carving. Those are great buy for the majority of people buying these they want to drive them often.
Go for the challenger y’all, won’t be disappointed 💪🏾
Can you explain why ? Looking for a weekly rental when I go to fl.
I also like the challenger more. Just because it's bigger. Performance wise, I would be happy with either. Unfortunately, GM refuses to offer bigger performance cars anymore. Chrysler has about 5 or more models with plenty of room and more than 400hp.
Traded my 2010 ss for a 2017 RT 392. Love my new ride. Its a comfortable ride and a total beast when you step on the trottle.
Ryan Sharma You race any 6 gen SS
@@thefitnesslife4988 he'll lose lol
@@yeezus850 exactly, bc I eat up 392s every chance I get on the highway!
@Isidro Gonzalez 😂😂😂😂😂😂
The styling of the Camaro had always been a favourite for me. The only huge downside for me is its dashboard, I just hate that the instrument panel just 'pops' up out of the dash, its just too bad. I did go and test drove a Challenger srt, and cannot wait to pick it up next week!
I love the Dodge Challenger too!!
Didn't even watch the video, lmao i spent the whole 4:55 looking at comments
No comparison, I traded in my challenger srt for an SS and haven't looked back. I'm more than satisfied with my camaro. The hardest part for me is not driving it to work and piling up mileage. It's all up to the individual though, one of my partners traded his SS for a 392 ( dumb trade imo) and he loves it.
These cars are legendary! The heritage that comes with these pony cars is stuff of legends! As long as Ford, Chevy, Dodge are around, these types of monsters will keep tearing up the streets!
Is it me or is it that people forget the Corvette has been out much longer and has an extreme racing history? Did they forget the Vette b/c they don't care for it or is it b/c it is in such another class (above) that we don't bother mentioning it amongst the 3 pony/muscle cars?
Challenger looks kooler
SS is sweet....but challenger for me all day everyday!
This is how I look at it, get a Camaro if you want the best performance, get a Challenger if you go for looks and style
Great video great pick Challenger all the way looks 100 times better go Mopar!!!!!
I think it should have been noted that the 6.4L challenger is also available in the Scat Pack variant. The SRT is at a higher price point due to the larger piston brakes, suspension differences, wider wheels and a few more things. Its confusing when you say the challenger is $50k when you can pick up the scat pack for in the high $30k
I purchased a new Camaro SS in 2010 and it felt like I was in a submarine, it had horrible visibility. The new Camaros do not look retro enough either. I love how true the Challenger is to the 1970 model year, and it has WAY better visibility. I will say the Camaro was a thrill to drive with the six speed manual transmission, however, I got rid of it after six months because I just did not like the poor visibility...
IT IS NOT SPELLED CAMERO!!!!!!!
Challenger 8-speed over the camaro and mustang manual or auto anytime. Maybe when the 10 speed is available for the other two I'll change my mind. Having driven all three the challenger is the more satisfying car.
challenger way too cool and guages way better
This review is so inaccurate, they claim the Camaro is $52k. How? It's just an SS doesn't even have leather, they have the mpg's all wrong too.
Well keep in mind that's Canadian dollars so if you're watching from the US it'll be different.
the camaro only cost 35,ooo . these two guys know nothing abour cars. they just waunted to get on you tube for five minutes.
They forgot to mention How much more sexy the Challenger looks then the camaro. Camaro is nice looking but challenger is easily the Sexiest
I'm shopping for a car right now. I want a Camaro but I'm looking at Challengers too, tbh I wouldn't be mad either way.
One of these will be my next car. Very tough decision.
Couldn't of said it better
Which one did you choose?
a bunch of Chevy guys in the comments
Go back to driving your bus
Awesome. Much help for me figuring out which of these two babies to buy soon! Thanks
Dennis McLeod II so which one did you go with? Lol i’m in the same boat right now & Im stuck 😂😩
@@richgirlappeal Not sure if my reply means anything to you anymore but I'd personally go with the Camaro. While I thinks its slightly uglier, I prefer smaller, lighter cars and I like the tighter interior of the Camaro more than the SUV-like space of the Challenger. With that said, I got a C6 Vette and the a beater hatchback as my combo. Sports car for most days and the hatchback for practicality needs and extreme percipitation
Challenger all day bro !
Wow that surprises me. The Mopar gets almost 4mpg more than the SS and has 30hp over it , that says a lot for the 3gen hemi mill but especially considering the wt dif. The chally is true to its muscle car roots but both the SS and GT are euro style of cars
That's L/100km, not MPG. Like golf, a lower number is better
I heard that theres a stereotype when joining the army that you buy either a camero of challenger with the bonus check that comes with an I believe 4 or 5 year contract. So naturally, im checking out my options xD
I'd buy a Cummins ram with my bonus check tbh
I remember I wanted a camaro so bad 2013-2018 and guess what, I never got it ☹️😭
Why not?
everyone always chooses the challenger. it's more comfortable and spacious.
ohhhhh I love that Challenger... the 392 SRT is what I want again.... because why spend the EXTRA 20-25 GRAND for the hell cat powertrain........I miss my 2012 SRT.. but the new one.. Ugh GOD my pants are getting warm.....now.. would be nice if I could get a job like you folks have :P
I turned away from the SS because they made it a complete sports car. Almost no one will ever take their Camaro on the track. I'd like it if it was a little bit bigger.
Clutch pedal is heavy? Maybe because your weak?
you're*
David Delgado good boy. Keep checking spellings!
so basically when you can't win the debate, correct their grammar errors, welcome to 2016-2017
Raid lmao
Raid bruh! lol
I have a 2019 Challenger R/T. I wish I had a 392, but even the 345 is fun. Both the Camaro and the Challenger are amazing cars, and I will seriously look into the Camaro SS the next time I'm shopping for a car.
Not sure if my reply means anything to you know, but have you considered a used C6 or C7 Vette? In my opinion if you have the space, a used Vette and a beater hatchback would make a great combo all year round. A 6th gen SS is similar to a base C6 but the Vette has more trunk space and is "more special" if you care for that sort of thing
Gutsy review. I see much hate in the comment thread.
On a side note: I had a choice between a Camaro and a Challenger and went with a challenger because it fits taller people better and is a more comfortable daily driver.
so basically heavy and fast in a straight line vs light and fast no matter what. this seems like a no brainer to me..............IMO
The camaro has the lightest clutch ever. this is why your channel has only 6k subs.
I got a 2017 V6 challenger in still loves it charcoal grey paint with charcoal grey rims . 305 horse power
Challenger more bad ass than camaro and mustang.
not hating on the dodge but if im looking at 2dr sports cars i want the feel of a sports car that aggressive attack mode feeling if i was looking for comfort then i would just look at sport suv and remember weight does play a role when it comes to racing throwing high hp numbers at a lighter car = win.
But which car gives you the best race car experience though? From driving down to the driving mobility to the inside of both cars ?
52k and 62k
LOL
And they wonder why Mustang out sells them both, combined!!! 33K-40k for a GT 40k gets you every option...lol
Yeah, man. I am a Chevy guy! Peeking at my dad's 69 427 Vette at 5 years old. Always loved Camaros and Firebirds. But they have no idea how to market these cars. Ford's marketing is soooooo good. From the actual advertisements, to their pricing structures, to the value proposition they put their cars together with, Ford Mustangs are always a really good package that balance livability and performance.
An American muscle car that can fit people in the back seat and golf clubs in the trunk. Visceral and practical. Challenger does win.
Which one better the Camaro or Challenger?
You lost me when you said. "shift mechanism" @2:27 lol
The Camaro definitely more sporty than Challenger...……………..And faster too.
Muscle car look always better and more hp
Mopar or no car
No Comparison Challenger wins hands down. Like the Camaro a lot but the SRT is so much better looking and fun to drive
"It eats prius's for breakfast.."
get the fuck outta here😂😂
i love cars man
theyre amazing
i just got my learners
i drive a gmc yukon
and that car is so nice
Challenger looks so much better then then camaro.
Two thumbs up couldn't agree more
Love that SRT... The exact one I eventually want... 6.4L NA 6MT... Gorgeous!!!
comparing performance cars for anything other but their performance is ridiculous...
Not true 99% of people don't want to drive a track car day 2 day they just aren't as comfy...
I’ve owned both. Camaro if you want all out performance, challenger if you want a better daily driver which why it is my current car.
Ok so i was thinking about getting my first sports car. I was debating between the challenger and the camero. Im just your everyday driverthat wants something reliable. Which one should i get? Don't be bias tho
Wtf that young minded generation. The older guy understands the autos are faster and better now. And younger guy saying no.
Maybe manuals are more fun?
dodge challenger srt 392 true american muscle.
I have a 2018 camero 1 ss it’s amazing car never could go to another car 💯🙏🏽✅
Challenger all day
If you know how to shift every car is smooth, as long as the trans and clutch are not worn or fubar.
Camaro.. here I come... SS Paaaapa
62k srt 392
68k hellcat
who the fuck would buy the 392 over the hellcat???especially with 6k being the difference
LJ Balongue you buy the Scat pack for the 392 performance at ~40k. The SRT is a weird trim, over priced.
God Save America stupid comment but then again what do you expect from a muffstang boy
LJ Balongue the $68,000 is for the base price hellcat. fully equipped your looking at $80,00- $90,000
lol no the HC already comes almost fully optioned, moonroof and auto trans is the only thing i can think of. if you see one close to 80k, its a huge dealer markup.
Only options for the hellcat is a moonroof auto and leather seats. Everthing else is include in price.
Great Video! Mopar Or No Car!! 😎#HemiAllDay#
I can appreciate that Chevy did do a good job making the Camaro look good. But to me I just couldn’t justify driving one, something about it just doesn’t let me take it seriously
It's a serious performance machine....all of the 6th gen Camaros are serious.
I like how they get better mpg in city, these auto company's really upping their game where it counts!
It's L/100km, not MPG. A lower # is better.
Driving.ca ohh, lol being American cars I wouldn't of thought that my bad
An auto? How old is that guy?
Blake Swan I tested the manual and loved it, but opted for the auto. My heart wanted the stick, but I've had surgeries on both shoulders and my back from injuries and had to think that over time, or if had more problems it could be a problem driving a lot with manual. Sometimes you gotta compromise I guess. I will say that auto in the SS is a good one. Buy what you like and enjoy it.
The auto in the new SS in simply fantastic. Extremely fast, feels great using the paddles. Faster in a straight line than the manual. And the ZL1 A10 is even faster... which is crazy and awesome.
Respectable review!
The Camaro front end looks squished.
Roses are red, violets are blue, I’m team challenger, who are you?
Team Camaro. I prefer smaller, lighter and better handling cars. The Challenger is attractive and sounds very good, but I like the confinement of the Camaro's interior and the overall performance better. That said, I like the Corvette miles ahead of both of them and have a beater hatchback alongside it in case of practical needs or extreme percipitation.
I rarely saw a challenger in the 70's it was always a Camaro it was really America's choice it was back then and still is today who cares about visibility reduction on the Camaro you have 2 side mirrors rear Camera assistance if you can't see with these you shouldn't be driving.
“Who cares about visibility reduction” 😂😂😂 just fuck everybody else on the road huh? Who cares if I can’t see them, I look cool.... 🤡
Automatic because you have to think of comfort? It's a fire breathing 450hp sports coupe and track car.. if you want comfort buy a Cadillac CTS-V.
Craig Tschirhart for nearly 100k, I think not lol I'll just wait for the hellcat jeep for that price
My mistake, ATS-V.. similar price and horsepower to the camaro.
You can have the caddy
the specs at the beginning of the video is wrong, base 2017 Camaro SS is $37,900.00 and mpg is 19 city 28 hwy
Our fuel economy specs are in L/100km because Canada
Might wanna check out for mistakes, in the vid the guy said it's a 2016 challenger. But in stats board, it says 2017. It's a small one of course :p but still for later references
Alright I was gonna buy a camaro but this video changed my mind now I want a challenger
Challenger is where it's at
All this debating but at the end of the day nobody even notices a Camaro when there's a Challenger present.
other way around buddy
I chose a Camaro anytime over a challenger It has more style and alot sharper Ss2 is a badass car over any car Thank you
The Challenger is a beast
A challenger is a beast as long as it's not racing a Camaro or mustang or BMW. Other than that the only thing a challenger smokes is mustang's and astronauts.
A challenger is a beast as long as it's not racing a Camaro or mustang or BMW. Other than that the only thing a challenger smokes is Honda's and astronauts.
The Triple C's of the Hood = Camaros, Challengers and Chargers. An ebony king's dream.
Don't forget the Corvette. May be driven by old men but the performance is absolutely high regardless of price
This probably sounds weird, but I never knew American muscle was so big in the hood. I like that. I'm white as can be and have always loved Camaros, Trans Ams, and Corvettes. We gotta band together, they keep making it harder and harder for the v8 lovers out there.
As TI once said, "Chevy's all colors, man."
You guys have the city to highway mileage backwards in the beginning.
Have a Hellcat and drove a ZL1 some, my Hellcat, in a straight line, seeing as how I have a normal job and am not a professional driver, blows the doors off the ZL1.
i wanna save up for a nice car
either the camaro or challenger
i dont know wich one to get
can someone tell me
no comparison. the SS wins in every performance aspect hands down.
justin bouche hey bro what's good? They try to bash the Camaro so much on here.
well, i can see their position, they like the more old school not the M3 feeling sports car.
justin bouche exactly. Which is weird. I don't like the challenger because of its white front end and that the IHS said the car is more liable to kill you in a front end crash or rollover.
lol, i was shocked when i saw the crash tests. the camaro and mustang both did great being small cars... the challenger (this behemoth) instead crushes the legs of its occupants.
justin bouche , wrong ! Not "hands down" in acceleration numbers. There are BONE STOCK 392 SP's & 392 SRT that run 12flat 1/4 miles, & 11.7's on DR's(no tune, no Boltons, just rear tire swap) I don't car who you are, if can't respect that then something's wrong with you..the SS mostly definitely wins as a sports car especially in the handling department. The SRT is clear a True Pure Muscle Car (not a sports car)
Camaro can go around corners, better long term reliability.
The challenger looks better and has a usable back seat, more comfortable as a cruiser
So in other words the 6th gen is just too ahead of the challenger lmao.
Challenger
I don’t now much about pony car do please some one help me out : im looking for a track ,drag and daily driver which would be the better option zl1 gt500 or a challenger?
looking retro? nope they just didn't evolve with the design, but some like that 70's look apparently
They will Evolve in 2018--2019 !!!!! Dodge Gonna kick some Ass !!!!!
Everytime I see one of these drive by I ALWAYS get mixed up and think it's the other. The overall shape is the same. I'm not a car guy btw, I can never tell the difference with these
You're bugging bro, the challenger is a much bigger car
Even a v6 would eat a Prius for breakfast
I own a Camaro and I can approve it is NOT a good daily driver very uncomfortable after time for sure.