They both have a place. For every day riding I’d prefer a four stroke. Slow technical stuff two stroke, fast trails I can keep a lot of momentum? Two stroke. Motocross track? Both
4 stroke Benefits : Better Traction at speed. Can sustain being reved high. Generally have a higher top speed, Power on Tap at low revs. Engine braking, Better fuel economy ... Hence why they are used in Motocross, Supercross. 2 Stroke benefits: Much more Torque, much quicker acceleration in the Mid to High revs, much lighter feel, more power per CC, cheaper and easier maintainance ... Hence why 2 strokes have dominated the Hard Enduro Scene and still make regular appearances at Enduro GP events depending on the location and course layout. Overall there is no real 2t vs 4t debate. Its literally different strokes for different folks. Go with what makes you happy and what you prefer for the type of riding you do.
Good comparison exept one thing: I always hear that maintainance argument but it confuses me a lot. Of course if something happens it'll be much more expensive on the four stroke but in my experience 4 Strokes generally last forever without any maintenance. My Dual Sport Bike is 25 years old and has around 24855 Miles on it. Nothing has ever happened to the engine and except for an Oil change every 6k Miles no Maintanance was required. If it was a 2 Stroke it would have probably required a new Piston / Top End Rebuild by now also much more Oil changes.
@@michaelnutzel2226 a full on competition enduro or MX four stroke would need a lot more maintenance than that. Mine needed a new piston at 185 hours and the valves needed adjustment at 140. 2 strokes generally need maintenance slightly more often but are easier and cheaper to sort when they do. Easier to diagnose a two stroke problem too, generally speaking.
@@Mockle07 I know competition Bikes need more maintenance and that 2 strokes are easier to repair. But in my experience 2 strokes just need so much more that I'm wondering if it's actually cheaper.
@@michaelnutzel2226 I agree, I think ultimately over time it’s much the same. I think it depends on whether you do your own maintenance or not; the average bone head level mechanic (me) would be able to do the vast majority of 2t engine maintenance but would take a 4t to a shop for most engine work. Ultimately though I think you’re right, 4t engines are way more reliable and easier to work on than the old grenade days. I race (badly) and know very few people who have any major issues with recent 4t engines.
Enjoy the video once again. Although. A 250 2t puts out far more power per CC than a 4 stroke. Its anywhere from 30 to 50% nore depending on the era of bikes. Remember that 250 2t competed against the 450 4t before 4t motors took over most racing.
The real facts is that, a 250 2 stroke should race against a 400cc 4 stroke. Thats the closest to the real deal you can get. But now when i think about it. A Honda Cr500r has 56,25 rear wheel horsepower. 2021 Honda crf450r has 55 rear wheel horsepower.. And there you have it, Facts.
@@noidontthinksolol Look it up yourself if you don't trust me. Search on youtube - 2021 Honda CRF450R Dyno Test The video is by ''Dirt Rider'' You're stuck in the 90's dude when it comes to 4 strokes. I dare you to look it up and then come back with a comment ;)
@@noidontthinksolol You're full of shit, Like Kaplan says. Kaplan does dynos also and he did one on a Cr500. 53,7 rear wheel horsepower. Idk about your 2 stroke fanboy feelings, I go by facts. Wake up buddy.
@@noidontthinksolol I didn't find anything on encyclopedia (google). Did you read anything that i wrote? ''SEARCH ON TH-cam'' Dirt rider, 2021 Honda CRF450R Dyno Test. Kaplan Cr500 dyno! Nothing that i said is on google IT'S ON TH-cam! Videos for you to see the truth! Now stop sneaking around with comments that makes no sence and just admit it. You're full of shit. I got strait ((facts)) against you and you just blindly ignored them. You're done. Rekt
Personally I’d take the 2 stroke over the 4 stroke with the same CC. But with how good the 4 strokes have gotten but the biggest issue is flame outs at low speeds dam annoying. I do hope KTM comes out with a 350cc 2 stroke and be allowed to compete with 450 4 strokes competition wise.
Get in some real tight technical woods.... Big 4 strokes without a Rekluse are easy to flame out unless you are all over the clutch, or are a true A-AA rider @@chrispewkreme
i ride supermoto and since i only have the license for 125s i prefer the two stroke because you can get close to 40hp and with 4 strokes like 12-16hp so theres a quite big difference
@@mfnspirdoo Wel that’s a bad comparison, we all know 2 strokes produce more power per cc but we go with 125 two stroke with 250 4 stroke and 250 2atroke with 450 4 stroke. No one compares it like you for obvious reasons
Everyone knows their both great bikes and it depends on what kind of riding your gonna do. But now that you don’t have to mix fuels anymore in 2 strokes I’d take a 2 stroker myself. But that’s why we have choices…👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
I remember when Yamaha released the 426 and they we're still racing two strokes. They allowed them to race in the 250 because they were about on par power wise and with the 125 class it was the 250 four stroke up until they got rid of two racing all together. When you race the same cc in a two stroke vs four stroke overall the two stroke will win.
Everyone in my family has always ridden 70s-80s bikes. I was just a kid when the YZ426F came out, but we went riding with a guy who had one, and he was very confident in having the best bike in camp. My dad was riding a 1978 Maico 440, and my uncle was on a 1981 Husqvarna 430XC, both air-cooled 2-strokes. Those old guys ran the YZF ragged. His power was almost a match for the Husky, but the Husky had a 6th gear that ended the conversation. The Maico simply had more horsepower than any other machine in attendance, and did serious damage through any kind of corners.
The husky seems to be catching the yammi even with slower starts. I'm impressed that the 4 stroke is so evenly matched to be honest because the 125 two stroke was really what the 250 4 stroke would have be matched against in the early years. Still gotta go with the two stroke but it's probably more my age and I have a soft spot for them because that was the thing when I was a teenager.
@@NathanRoberts-d4o Not quite twice as powerful as there is loses in the cycle beyond what a 4-stroke experiences. The less efficient charge exchange and the reduced rpm combine to limit 2-stroke to like 25% more per displacement. The other advantage of a 2-stroke is they tend to be lighter.
Never understood the division between the two. I love both engines for different reasons and at the end of the day its just fun to go riding. That being said I never raced or competed in enduro events it was all the the fun. But what I can say is I will never forget going from a 125kx to a 250kx for the first time, my friend was about 100lbs heavier than me and made it look easy to rip. I nearly ended up in thorn bushes.
Well, defintley the 2stroke is faster when compared to 4stroke engine that has a similar displacement. I would prefer a 2stroke offroad motorcycle because you do not feel the engine moving parts inertia in corners on the motocross track or in the rough technical enduro sections.
@@noidontthinksolol its not bs its very simple lol, a 250f is never ever keeping up with a 250 2t, a 250 2t is in the racing class open with 450s where as a 250f is with 125 2t in the lites class
@@noidontthinksolol a disadvantage of four strokes is compression stalling. If you stall the engine with the back brake, a 2 stroke will almost always restart when you let off the brake, as long as you're still moving. A four stroke will stay stalled.
Well, there's no 2 stroke on the market now that's going to beat a 450F. I definitely enjoy riding 2 strokes more though, because that's what I'm used to.
@@Tybren A 25 (or around there) year old 500 two stroke just won a race and destroyed every single 450 racing in the field and those 450's were newer bikes. There are old 125's and 250 two strokes beating newer 450's, so let them build brand new 2 strokes, and they would have to change the rules again. Make a new 450 two stroke and let it race a 450 four stroke and it wouldn't even be close with both operators being on the same level of skill.
@@ProphetsAmongUs I could see the 500 beating the 450 on top speed, not acceleration. And a 125 outrunning a 450? There's no way. Please provide a source..
@@Tybren The old 500 was killing the 450's at acceleration as well, he passed by all the 450's to take first place at the event against professional racers who were riding new 450 four strokes. Just search on TH-cam that's where i saw the races. I've ridden both 4 strokes and 2 strokes in my life and there was just no comparison, 2 strokes were just better all the way around for me accept for the 4 stroke engines seamed to last longer.
Even in the outboard motor world, 2strokes are far torquier and stronger than 4strokes. However, few manufacturers are making them anymore and 4 strokers are more fuel efficient.
Spent many hours and years on a Husky 250 CR, lots of mountains and mud and everything in between, including slow crawl trials-type stuff over dead falls etc. through tangled forests with no trails. Loved it! Steep mountains were fun and tough, and when you’re young it’s all good. In my mid 50’s rode a Christini 450 4s with 2 wheel drive and a recluse clutch. Steep climbs that I’d have to think long and hard about if on my Husky were a breeze with that Christini, just point it up hill and go. The extra torque at low rpms from the 450 combined with the front wheel pulling as well, I could play around all I wanted, not having to worry about the power curve on the 2s, or keeping the front wheel down by laying on the handle bars while trying to keep the rear from spinning by out finessing the throttle. Need to stop for some reason? That recluse clutch let the engine keep running. No trying to start the bike while holding the brake and giving it gas at the same time, all while fighting gravity and slippery slopes. Although I didn’t get to try it in the deep mud, I bet it would’ve been just as impressive. Granted, it could be argued that the Christini took all of the fun out of riding, but at my age it allowed me to go places and do things that I would’ve been hard pressed to do otherwise.
This video was interesting for the first couple of minutes. But I was much more interested to see which one would perform best up in the hills and trails over yonder. I'll be waiting for you ;-)
With 4-Stroke closing in on 2-Stroke performance, I think 4-Stroke is the future, just because of emission compliance. 4-Cycle engines burn cleaner, and are more lending to catalytic converters and oxygen sensors, which makes them cleaner and more fuel efficient. On a different subject, most outboard boat engines used to be 2-Stroke, but now, they've given way to 4-Stroke for the same reasons. Both motorcycles and outboard boat engines are considered "high performance", because of their high horsepower to weight ratio. 4-Stroke engines are also much more forgiving to prolonged engine braking down hills, because they have oil in the crank case. With 2-Stroke, letting off the throttle also cuts off oil supply, which can cause damage if done for prolonged periods of time. That's why virtually every street bike is 4-Stroke. (besides emissions)
It's pretty easy to oil them. I've been waiting for sled tech to catch on. My rmk has an oil pump that lubes the bottom bearing directly without injecting oil into the intake. A properly running 2t should be maintaining an oil bath in the bottom end, which is only lost when you go upside down or drain the case. Big reason they want a super high oil to fuel ratio on a fresh rebuild.
I ask this with my Father "which is better 2 stroke vs 4 stroke?" he said to "We don't compare something that is different but something similar. 2 stroke and 4 stroke are two different engines both in performance and characteristics we compare to find difference not highlight them" then began to nag me about my life hahahaha.
There's no comparison! A 2 stroke fires twice as much as a 4 stroke so obviously the 2 stroke will always have more power! (naturally aspirated of course)
Correct to an extent. Compare a 250/300 2 stroke with a 450 4 stroke and the results will be similar. Comparing a 250 2 stroke with with 250 4 stroke is not even a competition. 2 stokes put out more power per CC
@@vaughanhodgson the 300 will put out about 3hp less than the 450. Even the best riders in the world can't put that much power down on the track lap after lap.
When changing the muffler on the WR250F to an after market muffler, the engine will feel much stronger. the stock one is pretty much restricted. On dirt rider TH-cam channel, dyno test of stock WR250F and stock YZ250FX is about 3HP difference, both bikes are basically the same engine with different mapping , muffler and flywheel.
@@elonmust7470 hahaha well known by who, youtube comments experts?! 🤦🏼♂️😂 A stock 4 stroke MX bike will make around 40 bhp, so you think a 250 2 stroke makes 80bhp?! 👀😂 You might get 50bhp from a stock 250 2t, so like I said, nowhere near twice as much. Go and do some reading before replying 👍🏻
The WR is a tuned down 250 4 stroke. The Husky it putting out over double the HP and 30% more torque. Even compared to the super hot YZ250f, any 2 stroke 250 will destroy it, from any brand.
most will know this but a 2 stroke's piston is being fired twice as fast compared to a 4 stroke that's why there so peppy . drag races are a 2 strokes bread and butter .
If you are a good enough rider the 250 two stroke will smoke the four stroke 250. The reason such a topic even comes up is that there are very few riders that are good enough to make the superior two stroke work. So if you're a novice or intermediate, a 250 four stroke or 125 two stroke is the way to go. If you're an expert rider you can make a 250 two stroke work wonders for you. As for 450 four strokes, have you seen what Ryan Hughes has said about them?
Idk where the question is tho! The husky looked faster every time. The wr took it off the start, than the husky blew past, if you where on pavement the wr would than again pull past in the end
You think? i dont think because at the end is when the 2 stroke is in his powerband and makes more hp than the wr. The WR has more of an bottom end advantage
@@yannhayon2796 the husky maxes out at around 8600rpm or less where as the Yamaha revs to Close to 14k rpm. Nearly double. The husky is maxed out and having to slow down while the Yamaha is just getting warmed up. Both fairly equal playing fields, they just both excel in different places. The Yamaha doesn’t have the bottom end torque that the husky has. The husky makes more hp but it’s narrow and short lived where as Yamaha makes significantly less hp. Around 8-10hp less but the thing Revs to the moon and makes power the whole time. These modern four stroke 250s ride much more like an old 2 stroke than a modern counterbalanced two stroke does. His yz250 “Ktm killer” would blow both of these bikes out of the water in a drag race. But it would only win in a drag race or real motocross style race. On the road, Supermoto, harescramble, enduro the ktms besting it and so is the wr
@@superwilcox9026 I’ve owned and currently own both. I own a 2017 crf450r 2021 kx250 and 1998 kx250. The modern 250fs rev well beyond that of most or really any two stroke does and makes power almost to the very top of that. They ride very similar to older two strokes. Just smoother and more predictable. You have to rev the piss out of them and stay in the upper rpms to get any power out of them which is the same as a 2 stroke
2 strokes are fun to race (power) 4 strokes are fun for trails (comfortable) my 2 stroke race bike has short gears, so its great on tracks but now i want a 4 stroke to ride trails, because the gearing on my yz has a low top speed with too much shifting
Twenty pounds more of rider weight makes a huge difference. It is interesting that the 4 stroke did as well as it did, but the engine probably costed twice the money to manufacture, as the 2 stroke, if not more than that. There were too many variables, drag racing on a grassy, rough, slightly wet surface, like this. Tires the same on both bikes and dragging on a paved surface, would be much more telling, and accurate. I prefer a 4 stroke for traveling or joy riding with a lady friend on the buddy seat. I prefer a 2 stroke for playing around in the dirt, or woods. Keep the residual exhaust out of the combustion chamber on the power stroke, and back pressure out of the intake stroke, of a 2 stroke engine, and it would be back to the drawing board to get a 4 stroke to keep up with it. It would be difficult to beat a power stroke on every crank shaft revolution.
Depends on gearing I have a 5 valve wr 2004 with the typical tricks and pipe rejetted carb. Took away some of the hit or wheel spin put 1 tooth larger countershaft sproket bike is absolutely a blast hauls ass ride in Dez in so cal. Bike did 93 on Gps. By comparison my wr 500 2t with 16 44 gearing topped out at 108. It only spins 6800.
@@gorybonghit3211 yes but its comparing a 250cc 2 stroke to a 250cc 4 stroke. normally i believe its 150cc 2 stroke too 250cc 4 storke as a 2 stroke gets more power per cc
I have no idea why you guys choose the surface you did here, its slick as hell and requires too much fineness to hook up. I would like to see them both race on a hard dirt surface and I can almost guarantee the 4 stroker will get smoked every time. Also they need to have identical tires, gearing is subject to personal preference but does play a huge roll in the outcome.
As an old two stroke guy let me say that the two stroke walking away from the four stroke doesn't surprise me one bit as a two stroke makes power twice as often as a four stroke. HOWEVER, when the terrain is more than just a plush grassy field (like say a motocross track) a four stroke is more tractable than a two stroke, which will usually equate to a quicker lap time. The explosiveness of a two stroke's power makes finding traction much harder, which begins to affect everything else from the choice of lines around the track to a rider's fatigue level. The big problem I have with the new four strokes is the cost of maintenance. Compared to a two stroke it can be a problem for many new riders and racers. For instance, a KX450 Kawasaki calls for valve replacement every 25 hours - if memory serves - and they are NOT cheap. You could rebuild the top end of a typical two stroke at least twice for what the valves cost! Give me a two stroke!
It takes a 450 4 stroke to compete with a 250 2 stroke.and compare the price difference in a top end rebuild. I've owned both,and i.m.o. 4 strokes absolutely suck.
I did run a hare scramble a great rider had a Trials tire in back on a 300 KTM XCW . I asked his friend why and " He said don't question him he's taking this race " . He did . I ran a trials tire on the rear of a 74 Rickman 125 Zundapp six day and loved it. Still have the Rickman . My father in law always tractor pulled with worn tires and that worked great. Tires matter. 😎
Ahhh...the old 2 stroke vs 4 stroke.....Imagine having to rebuild a 4 stroke at the end of every race without a Factory team of mechanics ? F8#$k that !! Some people like doing that, I know. Also, I understand that with current tech (ie fuel injection, computer controlling and stuff) a two stroke can be made quite efficient (take THAT Euro Greenies)
The right way to look at it is this: they stopped developing the 2T so they could make you spend more money on the 4T so they had to make the 4T as fast as the old 2T. They did. So let's not pretend that the 4T is superior because it isn't. It is much harder to repair and more expensive to repair and maintain.
And not to mention 4ts are over engineered like crazy. They are hand grenades on two wheels, just so they can make a little bit more power than a 25 year old 2 stroke. I'll take the 2 stroke anyday. Low maintenance, I can get hundreds and hundreds of hours out of a motor and not need a rebuild or needing valves shimmed, nothing. Just maintain the 2 stroke and it'll start up first kick everytime. Plus it won't leave me stranded in the woods and I know that.
On a four wheeler, I have ran a 250 2t against 400 4t and did well against them. When they went to 250 2t against 450 4t, I could run with them. If they had the 4t built, they had more power.
My question is, if the four stroke seems equal on a course then why didn’t the FIM/AMA allow 2-stroke 250’s to compete with 4-stroke 250’s? We all know the answer.
With a two stroke, every stroke is a power stroke. That is why Detroit Diesel was so prominent in genset applications, the recovery time for heavy loads was very good with a two cycle engine.
250 4 stroke is equal to 125 2 stroke 450 4 stroke is equal to 250 2 stroke and has always been that way when did they start comparing them like this. Do people even know how the 2 bikes work? The 250 2 stroke is going to beat the 4 stroke every time
I started on two strokes then I got into four strokes now I'm back into two stroke. I have the new KTM 300 XC TPI I will never go back into four stroke this bike kicks ass! Two strokes are easier and cheaper to work on as well! I raced my buddies 450 and beat his ass two stroke all the way!
My two favorite dirt-bikes in the whole entire 🌏world🌎... lol Seriously, I ride a Husky TE250 because 90% of what I ride is hilly, tight, rocky terrain with plenty of water, mud and obstacles.... A modern 2 stroke engine is just better suited for this stuff. But believe me, I gave serious consideration to a WR250F... if the terrain I have was a little more open and faster I'd probably be on a WR.
2 stroke all the way, sounds better, lighter, better acceleration, way easier and cheaper to fix, easier to tune (Vs) 4 stroke's slightly better traction?
I only drove 2 stroke 50cc in the 1980's. But I'm not a grease monkey, I only drove them, did take 'm apart to clean and put back together with help from dad (else I'd have a hand full of nuts, not knowing which I had missed) One of the bikes, Yamaha FS1, had a weird thing about it, normal top speed was about 65 KPH, driving for long enough to warm up, close the throttle, immediately pull full open, I'd hear and feel a 'KNOCK' and suddenly that same bike did over 100 KPH. I never figured out what that was or why it happened. I know the frame wasn't built for those kind of speeds, but at 16 years old, you don't give such things a second thought, the faster the better, right ...
I'm too old to ride anymore but still have my CR500 2 stroke to fill my garage with that beautiful smoke and sound. Sounds way better than a flat 4 stroke fart sound.
I’ve got the 2023 fully unrestricted with the competition ECU and the CCU with the handlebar switch this new wr is a beast so forgiving in mistakes I’ve learned Turing the idle up a bit and keeping the rpm’s a little higher helps with the stalling and clutch lots of clutch in the technical shit
High quality video but a 250 2 stroke should kill a 250 4 stroke. You're comparing 2 completely different bikes as well. I'm a 2 stroke guy but I've had a KXF 250 and I have a 400 EX quad. The KXF 250 (yes it was the 1st year Kawasaki made it so it had some bugs) broke down so much I went right back to 2 strokes. The 400 EX is basically an XR 400 engine so it's bullet proof and not as high performance as a mx bike. I actually have a lot of respect for the Yamaha WR 250 and would like to own one some day soon. Let's say you compared a YZF 250 and YZ 250 the YZ would kill it the drag race.
We already have know the answer to this for a long time... per displacement 2 strokes make more power than 4 strokes. But the 4 strokes are preferred in motorcross because they allow 250cc 4 strokes to race against 125cc 2 strokes and 450cc 4 strokes to compete against 250cc 2 strokes. Those rules greatly favor 4 strokes so that's why everyone moved to racing 4 strokes.
Drag racing the 2 stroke should always win. Hard enduro the 2 stroke wins because it's lighter and doesn't overheat going really slow. The 4 stroke is faster around a track because it has such a wide powerband. The 2 strokes have a very narrow powerband and it takes a lot of skill to keep them at full power when you are constantly changing speeds. The 4 stroke vibrates less and is more planted riding on a trail. You can hold a 4 stroke wide open, like on a fireroad, all day long. Try that on a racing 2 stroke and it will blow up in about 30 minutes. Here's the 250's I have owned: '75 Yamaha MX250, "76 YZ250, '77 YZ250 (Red Bud winner), '97 YZ250, '00 YZ250, '01 YZ250, '02 YZ250, '04 YZ250F, '09 WR250F, Current bike '17 WR250F. I prefer 4 strokes. They are easier to ride fast on varied terrain. I live in Utah.
Well from a riding stand point being a younger guy i absolutely loveee the 2t 250 its lighter very easy to wip around amazing for trails and there very easy to do maintenance on and a lot cheaper 4t 250 its fun it just doesnt have all theeat and potatoes that most want out of a bike its too smooth to be honest its fun but after a whilr the 4t just gets boring both fun bikes and you definitely have to have more respect with a 2t cause you actually have to ride the bike u cant just twist the throttle and put around like you can on a 4t
@@Mockle07 He compared a 250 vs 250. The right comparison is 450 4 stroke vs 250 2 stroke. Or compare a 125 2 stroke vs 250 4 stroke. His comparison wasn’t valid.
That comparison started years ago with the Japanese bike companies heavily influencing the AMA to create the double displacement rules. It was stupid then and it’s stupid now. Race equal displacement.
should've been a wr450f for an equal displacement test against a 250 2t, 2t has double displacement to 4t, hence why 125 2t race 250f and 250 2t races 450f on amateur circuits
Im a better technical rider on these newer 2strokes, but faster on the 4 strokes and generally get better results racing cause I do less shifting and they seem a little more Stabil as the speeds go up. although a little heavier, they wear me out less. On knarly terrain, ktm/husky 2t get awesome traction at really low rpm where as 4t typically wont even stay running with much less than idle rpm.
The gulf between two and four stroke off-road bikes has narrowed considerably since the 1970s when 2t meant narrow power and lightness and 4t meant heavy and big capacity. Now weight differences are marginal and power has really blossomed for small 4ts. All I can say is that for those tarmac stretches 4ts are happier with constant throttle than 2ts and 2ts just have that response. But if you like engine braking 4t is king. Spoilt for choice then?
Which do you guys prefer, 2 stroke or 4 stroke? Also, would anyone like to see more of this? Maybe next time we could do a handling test 🏁
2 stroke
2 stroke
2 stroke
S strock
They both have a place. For every day riding I’d prefer a four stroke. Slow technical stuff two stroke, fast trails I can keep a lot of momentum? Two stroke. Motocross track? Both
4 stroke Benefits : Better Traction at speed. Can sustain being reved high. Generally have a higher top speed, Power on Tap at low revs. Engine braking, Better fuel economy ... Hence why they are used in Motocross, Supercross.
2 Stroke benefits: Much more Torque, much quicker acceleration in the Mid to High revs, much lighter feel, more power per CC, cheaper and easier maintainance ... Hence why 2 strokes have dominated the Hard Enduro Scene and still make regular appearances at Enduro GP events depending on the location and course layout.
Overall there is no real 2t vs 4t debate.
Its literally different strokes for different folks. Go with what makes you happy and what you prefer for the type of riding you do.
Good comparison exept one thing: I always hear that maintainance argument but it confuses me a lot. Of course if something happens it'll be much more expensive on the four stroke but in my experience 4 Strokes generally last forever without any maintenance. My Dual Sport Bike is 25 years old and has around 24855 Miles on it. Nothing has ever happened to the engine and except for an Oil change every 6k Miles no Maintanance was required. If it was a 2 Stroke it would have probably required a new Piston / Top End Rebuild by now also much more Oil changes.
Forgot to mention the sound for 2 strokes
@@michaelnutzel2226 a full on competition enduro or MX four stroke would need a lot more maintenance than that. Mine needed a new piston at 185 hours and the valves needed adjustment at 140. 2 strokes generally need maintenance slightly more often but are easier and cheaper to sort when they do. Easier to diagnose a two stroke problem too, generally speaking.
@@Mockle07 I know competition Bikes need more maintenance and that 2 strokes are easier to repair. But in my experience 2 strokes just need so much more that I'm wondering if it's actually cheaper.
@@michaelnutzel2226 I agree, I think ultimately over time it’s much the same. I think it depends on whether you do your own maintenance or not; the average bone head level mechanic (me) would be able to do the vast majority of 2t engine maintenance but would take a 4t to a shop for most engine work.
Ultimately though I think you’re right, 4t engines are way more reliable and easier to work on than the old grenade days. I race (badly) and know very few people who have any major issues with recent 4t engines.
I’m old school. I totally dig 2-strokes over 4’s. I wouldn’t mind a 4-stroker for a dual sport or a street bike but that’s about it for me.
2stroke just so much work
@@waydeyoung2748 if you take care of them they last a long time just like anything else.
@@waydeyoung2748 3 moving part’s. I think not
@@waydeyoung2748 mixing gas and replacing a piston each season? Go buy a 4 stroke and letme know how much work bud.
Yeah 4 stroke for the street/dual sport. 2 stroke for enduro.
Enjoy the video once again. Although. A 250 2t puts out far more power per CC than a 4 stroke. Its anywhere from 30 to 50% nore depending on the era of bikes. Remember that 250 2t competed against the 450 4t before 4t motors took over most racing.
I think its 250 2t vs 350 4t demanding on power
The real facts is that, a 250 2 stroke should race against a 400cc 4 stroke.
Thats the closest to the real deal you can get.
But now when i think about it. A Honda Cr500r has 56,25 rear wheel horsepower.
2021 Honda crf450r has 55 rear wheel horsepower..
And there you have it, Facts.
@@noidontthinksolol Look it up yourself if you don't trust me. Search on youtube - 2021 Honda CRF450R Dyno Test
The video is by ''Dirt Rider''
You're stuck in the 90's dude when it comes to 4 strokes.
I dare you to look it up and then come back with a comment ;)
@@noidontthinksolol You're full of shit, Like Kaplan says.
Kaplan does dynos also and he did one on a Cr500. 53,7 rear wheel horsepower.
Idk about your 2 stroke fanboy feelings, I go by facts.
Wake up buddy.
@@noidontthinksolol I didn't find anything on encyclopedia (google). Did you read anything that i wrote? ''SEARCH ON TH-cam'' Dirt rider, 2021 Honda CRF450R Dyno Test.
Kaplan Cr500 dyno! Nothing that i said is on google IT'S ON TH-cam! Videos for you to see the truth!
Now stop sneaking around with comments that makes no sence and just admit it. You're full of shit. I got strait ((facts)) against you and you just blindly ignored them.
You're done. Rekt
Personally I’d take the 2 stroke over the 4 stroke with the same CC. But with how good the 4 strokes have gotten but the biggest issue is flame outs at low speeds dam annoying. I do hope KTM comes out with a 350cc 2 stroke and be allowed to compete with 450 4 strokes competition wise.
I’ve got a WR250R and it’s never flamed out. My buddy has aCRF450 and it hasn’t flamed out. For whatever that’s worth.
@@chrispewkreme Try getting off the fire roads bud
Get in some real tight technical woods.... Big 4 strokes without a Rekluse are easy to flame out unless you are all over the clutch, or are a true A-AA rider @@chrispewkreme
Your channel is super underrated, I believe it will grow substantially this year!
🤞
i ride supermoto and since i only have the license for 125s i prefer the two stroke because you can get close to 40hp and with 4 strokes like 12-16hp so theres a quite big difference
Are u comparing a 125 2 stroke with a 125 4 stroke?
@@bruhroyale12123 yes because both can be ridden with a a1 licence
@@mfnspirdoo Wel that’s a bad comparison, we all know 2 strokes produce more power per cc but we go with 125 two stroke with 250 4 stroke and 250 2atroke with 450 4 stroke.
No one compares it like you for obvious reasons
@@bruhroyale12123 quite a lot of people in the eu do for quite obv reasons: you can ride them on street at 16yrs old
@@mfnspirdoo really? Isn’t there a power to weight ratio restriction aswell? Not just the cc’s?
Everyone knows their both great bikes and it depends on what kind of riding your gonna do. But now that you don’t have to mix fuels anymore in 2 strokes I’d take a 2 stroker myself. But that’s why we have choices…👍🏼👍🏼👍🏼
I had a CR 250 and that was the fastest bike I've ever rode. I bought it brand new. 2 stroke is faster than the 4 stroke all day long
I remember when Yamaha released the 426 and they we're still racing two strokes. They allowed them to race in the 250 because they were about on par power wise and with the 125 class it was the 250 four stroke up until they got rid of two racing all together. When you race the same cc in a two stroke vs four stroke overall the two stroke will win.
That bike Yamaha wanted in with the 4 strokes back in 1996 also cost Yamaha about $500,000.
Everyone in my family has always ridden 70s-80s bikes. I was just a kid when the YZ426F came out, but we went riding with a guy who had one, and he was very confident in having the best bike in camp. My dad was riding a 1978 Maico 440, and my uncle was on a 1981 Husqvarna 430XC, both air-cooled 2-strokes. Those old guys ran the YZF ragged. His power was almost a match for the Husky, but the Husky had a 6th gear that ended the conversation. The Maico simply had more horsepower than any other machine in attendance, and did serious damage through any kind of corners.
The husky seems to be catching the yammi even with slower starts. I'm impressed that the 4 stroke is so evenly matched to be honest because the 125 two stroke was really what the 250 4 stroke would have be matched against in the early years. Still gotta go with the two stroke but it's probably more my age and I have a soft spot for them because that was the thing when I was a teenager.
On equal displacement the 2-stroke is going to have a significant advantage, not 2X but more like 25%.
2 years late, they are twice as powerful but none of them rev as high, same rpm, there twice as powerful
@@NathanRoberts-d4o Not quite twice as powerful as there is loses in the cycle beyond what a 4-stroke experiences. The less efficient charge exchange and the reduced rpm combine to limit 2-stroke to like 25% more per displacement. The other advantage of a 2-stroke is they tend to be lighter.
Never understood the division between the two. I love both engines for different reasons and at the end of the day its just fun to go riding. That being said I never raced or competed in enduro events it was all the the fun. But what I can say is I will never forget going from a 125kx to a 250kx for the first time, my friend was about 100lbs heavier than me and made it look easy to rip. I nearly ended up in thorn bushes.
Love the way you guys interact with each other, not bashing just having good fun
Well, defintley the 2stroke is faster when compared to 4stroke engine that has a similar displacement.
I would prefer a 2stroke offroad motorcycle because you do not feel the engine moving parts inertia in corners on the motocross track or in the rough technical enduro sections.
@@noidontthinksolol its not bs its very simple lol, a 250f is never ever keeping up with a 250 2t, a 250 2t is in the racing class open with 450s where as a 250f is with 125 2t in the lites class
@@noidontthinksolol hahahahah you have no idea
@@noidontthinksolol a disadvantage of four strokes is compression stalling. If you stall the engine with the back brake, a 2 stroke will almost always restart when you let off the brake, as long as you're still moving. A four stroke will stay stalled.
The difference is I can tear down that 2T engine replaced piston, rings, gaskets and put it back together for about $200
I have a yz490 and an ossa 250 trials bike………love them both, had them since the early 80’s……….well maintained and still ride them both
Cool video, great racing!! Wish I had a runway like that to race in my videos.
Thanks for posting, you're awesome!
2 Strokes are definitely better and faster to me.
Well, there's no 2 stroke on the market now that's going to beat a 450F. I definitely enjoy riding 2 strokes more though, because that's what I'm used to.
i like the 4 strokes better because of the sound but i like to ride 2 strokes better
@@Tybren A 25 (or around there) year old 500 two stroke just won a race and destroyed every single 450 racing in the field and those 450's were newer bikes. There are old 125's and 250 two strokes beating newer 450's, so let them build brand new 2 strokes, and they would have to change the rules again. Make a new 450 two stroke and let it race a 450 four stroke and it wouldn't even be close with both operators being on the same level of skill.
@@ProphetsAmongUs I could see the 500 beating the 450 on top speed, not acceleration. And a 125 outrunning a 450? There's no way. Please provide a source..
@@Tybren The old 500 was killing the 450's at acceleration as well, he passed by all the 450's to take first place at the event against professional racers who were riding new 450 four strokes. Just search on TH-cam that's where i saw the races. I've ridden both 4 strokes and 2 strokes in my life and there was just no comparison, 2 strokes were just better all the way around for me accept for the 4 stroke engines seamed to last longer.
Even in the outboard motor world, 2strokes are far torquier and stronger than 4strokes. However, few manufacturers are making them anymore and 4 strokers are more fuel efficient.
Spent many hours and years on a Husky 250 CR, lots of mountains and mud and everything in between, including slow crawl trials-type stuff over dead falls etc. through tangled forests with no trails. Loved it! Steep mountains were fun and tough, and when you’re young it’s all good. In my mid 50’s rode a Christini 450 4s with 2 wheel drive and a recluse clutch. Steep climbs that I’d have to think long and hard about if on my Husky were a breeze with that Christini, just point it up hill and go. The extra torque at low rpms from the 450 combined with the front wheel pulling as well, I could play around all I wanted, not having to worry about the power curve on the 2s, or keeping the front wheel down by laying on the handle bars while trying to keep the rear from spinning by out finessing the throttle. Need to stop for some reason? That recluse clutch let the engine keep running. No trying to start the bike while holding the brake and giving it gas at the same time, all while fighting gravity and slippery slopes. Although I didn’t get to try it in the deep mud, I bet it would’ve been just as impressive. Granted, it could be argued that the Christini took all of the fun out of riding, but at my age it allowed me to go places and do things that I would’ve been hard pressed to do otherwise.
Really appreciate the time money and effort put into these videos cuz ! Definitely prefer the shorter action packed style of filming !
This video was interesting for the first couple of minutes. But I was much more interested to see which one would perform best up in the hills and trails over yonder. I'll be waiting for you ;-)
Anybody who knows bikes knew what was gonna happen, but that was still really entertaining. Cheers!
With 4-Stroke closing in on 2-Stroke performance, I think 4-Stroke is the future, just because of emission compliance. 4-Cycle engines burn cleaner, and are more lending to catalytic converters and oxygen sensors, which makes them cleaner and more fuel efficient. On a different subject, most outboard boat engines used to be 2-Stroke, but now, they've given way to 4-Stroke for the same reasons. Both motorcycles and outboard boat engines are considered "high performance", because of their high horsepower to weight ratio. 4-Stroke engines are also much more forgiving to prolonged engine braking down hills, because they have oil in the crank case. With 2-Stroke, letting off the throttle also cuts off oil supply, which can cause damage if done for prolonged periods of time. That's why virtually every street bike is 4-Stroke. (besides emissions)
It's pretty easy to oil them. I've been waiting for sled tech to catch on. My rmk has an oil pump that lubes the bottom bearing directly without injecting oil into the intake. A properly running 2t should be maintaining an oil bath in the bottom end, which is only lost when you go upside down or drain the case. Big reason they want a super high oil to fuel ratio on a fresh rebuild.
I ask this with my Father "which is better 2 stroke vs 4 stroke?"
he said to "We don't compare something that is different but something similar. 2 stroke and 4 stroke are two different engines both in performance and characteristics we compare to find difference not highlight them" then began to nag me about my life hahahaha.
There's no comparison!
A 2 stroke fires twice as much as a 4 stroke so obviously the 2 stroke will always have more power! (naturally aspirated of course)
Correct to an extent. Compare a 250/300 2 stroke with a 450 4 stroke and the results will be similar. Comparing a 250 2 stroke with with 250 4 stroke is not even a competition. 2 stokes put out more power per CC
@@braidenhills2417 they will not be similar a 450 puts out near 60 hp the 250 2t puts out low 40s
@@vaughanhodgson the 300 will put out about 3hp less than the 450.
Even the best riders in the world can't put that much power down on the track lap after lap.
@@vaughanhodgsonlow 40’s? Dog your high. That’s a 125 with a high compression head
@@vaughanhodgson250 2 strokes make low 50s 300’s make mid 50’s 450’s make 55 to 60
When changing the muffler on the WR250F to an after market muffler, the engine will feel much stronger. the stock one is pretty much restricted. On dirt rider TH-cam channel, dyno test of stock WR250F and stock YZ250FX is about 3HP difference, both bikes are basically the same engine with different mapping , muffler and flywheel.
Depends on where you live. The UK WR is fully uncorked from the showroom, in the USA for example, it is not.
lol, the 2 stroke is capable of making twice the power of the 4...
@@elonmust7470 😂 no it is not! 🤦🏼♂️😂 not even close to twice the power!
@@Mockle07 It's well known fact that a 2 stroke makes roughly double the power of a 4 of the same displacement........
@@elonmust7470 hahaha well known by who, youtube comments experts?! 🤦🏼♂️😂
A stock 4 stroke MX bike will make around 40 bhp, so you think a 250 2 stroke makes 80bhp?! 👀😂
You might get 50bhp from a stock 250 2t, so like I said, nowhere near twice as much. Go and do some reading before replying 👍🏻
The WR is a tuned down 250 4 stroke. The Husky it putting out over double the HP and 30% more torque. Even compared to the super hot YZ250f, any 2 stroke 250 will destroy it, from any brand.
It didn't.
most will know this but a 2 stroke's piston is being fired twice as fast compared to a 4 stroke that's why there so peppy . drag races are a 2 strokes bread and butter .
2T off road 4T on road that's my personal choice.
If you are a good enough rider the 250 two stroke will smoke the four stroke 250. The reason such a topic even comes up is that there are very few riders that are good enough to make the superior two stroke work. So if you're a novice or intermediate, a 250 four stroke or 125 two stroke is the way to go. If you're an expert rider you can make a 250 two stroke work wonders for you. As for 450 four strokes, have you seen what Ryan Hughes has said about them?
Idk where the question is tho! The husky looked faster every time. The wr took it off the start, than the husky blew past, if you where on pavement the wr would than again pull past in the end
You think? i dont think because at the end is when the 2 stroke is in his powerband and makes more hp than the wr. The WR has more of an bottom end advantage
@@yannhayon2796 the husky maxes out at around 8600rpm or less where as the Yamaha revs to Close to 14k rpm. Nearly double. The husky is maxed out and having to slow down while the Yamaha is just getting warmed up. Both fairly equal playing fields, they just both excel in different places. The Yamaha doesn’t have the bottom end torque that the husky has. The husky makes more hp but it’s narrow and short lived where as Yamaha makes significantly less hp. Around 8-10hp less but the thing Revs to the moon and makes power the whole time. These modern four stroke 250s ride much more like an old 2 stroke than a modern counterbalanced two stroke does. His yz250 “Ktm killer” would blow both of these bikes out of the water in a drag race. But it would only win in a drag race or real motocross style race. On the road, Supermoto, harescramble, enduro the ktms besting it and so is the wr
If you ever owned and rode both 250s its not even close. 2t will spank it all day every day
@@superwilcox9026 I’ve owned and currently own both. I own a 2017 crf450r 2021 kx250 and 1998 kx250. The modern 250fs rev well beyond that of most or really any two stroke does and makes power almost to the very top of that. They ride very similar to older two strokes. Just smoother and more predictable. You have to rev the piss out of them and stay in the upper rpms to get any power out of them which is the same as a 2 stroke
2 strokes are fun to race (power)
4 strokes are fun for trails (comfortable)
my 2 stroke race bike has short gears, so its great on tracks
but now i want a 4 stroke to ride trails, because the gearing on my yz has a low top speed with too much shifting
Exactly, my wr is perfect for light hearted trail rides
Absolutely no comparison 2 stroke always wins.
Twenty pounds more of rider weight makes a huge difference. It is interesting that the 4 stroke did as well as it did, but the engine probably costed twice the money to manufacture, as the 2 stroke, if not more than that. There were too many variables, drag racing on a grassy, rough, slightly wet surface, like this. Tires the same on both bikes and dragging on a paved surface, would be much more telling, and accurate. I prefer a 4 stroke for traveling or joy riding with a lady friend on the buddy seat. I prefer a 2 stroke for playing around in the dirt, or woods. Keep the residual exhaust out of the combustion chamber on the power stroke, and back pressure out of the intake stroke, of a 2 stroke engine, and it would be back to the drawing board to get a 4 stroke to keep up with it. It would be difficult to beat a power stroke on every crank shaft revolution.
Too bad in my country, motorcycle manufacturers stopped making two strokes because of the air pollution it makes 🥲
Love the new channel icon pick man👌 jus as good as the content
Every time I race my 2003 yz85 against my friends crf100 Klx140 and honda 250 sport quad I always come out on top
Four stroke is like a race car that lost two wheels.
Two stroke is like climbing on a bottle rocket and lighting the fuse.
Two strokes dont brake stall or get the shudders if you drop off the power band.
Drag race the old yz250 against that wr and see what happens lol it’ll blow its doors off
It would beat it by a little bit but a mint yz250 would smoke it
They aren’t comparing motocross bikes
Depends on gearing I have a 5 valve wr 2004 with the typical tricks and pipe rejetted carb. Took away some of the hit or wheel spin put 1 tooth larger countershaft sproket bike is absolutely a blast hauls ass ride in Dez in so cal. Bike did 93 on Gps. By comparison my wr 500 2t with 16 44 gearing topped out at 108. It only spins 6800.
Bunch of excuses from the dude on the blue
a good video however i would say that this is an unfair test as 2 strokes produce much more power compared to a 4 stroke of equal displacement.
How is it unfair? This is a comparison between 2 and 4 stroke.
@@gorybonghit3211 yes but its comparing a 250cc 2 stroke to a 250cc 4 stroke. normally i believe its 150cc 2 stroke too 250cc 4 storke as a 2 stroke gets more power per cc
I'd rather have the two stroke when that timing chain breaks and destroys the engine. Can't hurt that 2 stroke.
Save everyone some time, get the 2 stroke, it's way more fun.
Thank you
I have no idea why you guys choose the surface you did here, its slick as hell and requires too much fineness to hook up. I would like to see them both race on a hard dirt surface and I can almost guarantee the 4 stroker will get smoked every time. Also they need to have identical tires, gearing is subject to personal preference but does play a huge roll in the outcome.
This is the real world. Not every test needs to benefit the side you like.
@@Bigbossman126244 stroke guys. They'd rather see a 450 vs 250 2 stroke.
@@mikieemiike3979 don’t really care about dirt bikes just annoying when people “well der grass is sliper on da dirtbike tires”
2t 2nd gear launch is where its at lads I get the hole shots all day long.
“There is only the race, everything before and after is just waiting.” Steve McQueen.
As an old two stroke guy let me say that the two stroke walking away from the four stroke doesn't surprise me one bit as a two stroke makes power twice as often as a four stroke. HOWEVER, when the terrain is more than just a plush grassy field (like say a motocross track) a four stroke is more tractable than a two stroke, which will usually equate to a quicker lap time. The explosiveness of a two stroke's power makes finding traction much harder, which begins to affect everything else from the choice of lines around the track to a rider's fatigue level. The big problem I have with the new four strokes is the cost of maintenance. Compared to a two stroke it can be a problem for many new riders and racers. For instance, a KX450 Kawasaki calls for valve replacement every 25 hours - if memory serves - and they are NOT cheap. You could rebuild the top end of a typical two stroke at least twice for what the valves cost! Give me a two stroke!
It takes a 450 4 stroke to compete with a 250 2 stroke.and compare the price difference in a top end rebuild. I've owned both,and i.m.o. 4 strokes absolutely suck.
This only proved that the Yama is an excellent 4t for keeping up with a bike that revs pretty much twice as much.
4 stroke bikes rev higher than 2 stroke. 15k vs 10k
I did run a hare scramble a great rider had a Trials tire in back on a 300 KTM XCW . I asked his friend why and " He said don't question him he's taking this race " . He did . I ran a trials tire on the rear of a 74 Rickman 125 Zundapp six day and loved it. Still have the Rickman . My father in law always tractor pulled with worn tires and that worked great. Tires matter. 😎
When Yamaha first built these bikes they built 400 to compete in 250 class doesn't look like much has changed
Ahhh...the old 2 stroke vs 4 stroke.....Imagine having to rebuild a 4 stroke at the end of every race without a Factory team of mechanics ?
F8#$k that !! Some people like doing that, I know.
Also, I understand that with current tech (ie fuel injection, computer controlling and stuff) a two stroke can be made quite efficient (take THAT Euro Greenies)
The two stroke will win every time
The right way to look at it is this: they stopped developing the 2T so they could make you spend more money on the 4T so they had to make the 4T as fast as the old 2T. They did. So let's not pretend that the 4T is superior because it isn't. It is much harder to repair and more expensive to repair and maintain.
And not to mention 4ts are over engineered like crazy. They are hand grenades on two wheels, just so they can make a little bit more power than a 25 year old 2 stroke. I'll take the 2 stroke anyday. Low maintenance, I can get hundreds and hundreds of hours out of a motor and not need a rebuild or needing valves shimmed, nothing. Just maintain the 2 stroke and it'll start up first kick everytime. Plus it won't leave me stranded in the woods and I know that.
On a four wheeler, I have ran a 250 2t against 400 4t and did well against them. When they went to 250 2t against 450 4t, I could run with them. If they had the 4t built, they had more power.
This was not a balanced duel, 250 2t is stronger but the video was interesting and well shot and both bikes have their charms.
a good rider will always win on a two stroke ...if he knows what he is doing, and keep it in the meat of it's power band!
250 cc 2 stroke can cope 400cc 4 Stroke engine in drag race
Yamaha wr never lets you down
My question is, if the four stroke seems equal on a course then why didn’t the FIM/AMA allow 2-stroke 250’s to compete with 4-stroke 250’s? We all know the answer.
With a two stroke, every stroke is a power stroke. That is why Detroit Diesel was so prominent in genset applications, the recovery time for heavy loads was very good with a two cycle engine.
250 4 stroke is equal to 125 2 stroke
450 4 stroke is equal to 250 2 stroke and has always been that way when did they start comparing them like this. Do people even know how the 2 bikes work? The 250 2 stroke is going to beat the 4 stroke every time
2- stroke for life! 4- strokes are great, until you have to pay the price of a rebuild!!
goes to show either can be tuned to do what the other is "supposed" to be good at. good video
I started on two strokes then I got into four strokes now I'm back into two stroke. I have the new KTM 300 XC TPI I will never go back into four stroke this bike kicks ass! Two strokes are easier and cheaper to work on as well! I raced my buddies 450 and beat his ass two stroke all the way!
My two favorite dirt-bikes in the whole entire 🌏world🌎... lol Seriously, I ride a Husky TE250 because 90% of what I ride is hilly, tight, rocky terrain with plenty of water, mud and obstacles.... A modern 2 stroke engine is just better suited for this stuff. But believe me, I gave serious consideration to a WR250F... if the terrain I have was a little more open and faster I'd probably be on a WR.
2 stroke all the way, sounds better, lighter, better acceleration, way easier and cheaper to fix, easier to tune (Vs) 4 stroke's slightly better traction?
I'm a kart racer... it'll always be two stroke for me... not to mention the smell of R30 :)
Next time try a sandy uphill, the 2-stroke will shine because of 30% more torque.
I only drove 2 stroke 50cc in the 1980's.
But I'm not a grease monkey, I only drove them, did take 'm apart to clean and put back together with help from dad (else I'd have a hand full of nuts, not knowing which I had missed)
One of the bikes, Yamaha FS1, had a weird thing about it, normal top speed was about 65 KPH, driving for long enough to warm up, close the throttle, immediately pull full open, I'd hear and feel a 'KNOCK' and suddenly that same bike did over 100 KPH.
I never figured out what that was or why it happened.
I know the frame wasn't built for those kind of speeds, but at 16 years old, you don't give such things a second thought, the faster the better, right ...
Tested and proven even in dragrace in underbone same CC 2stroke always win
Honda, Kawasaki and Suzuki are missing out on a lot of sales and profit. Yamaha and KTMs cleaning up!
I'm too old to ride anymore but still have my CR500 2 stroke to fill my garage with that beautiful smoke and sound. Sounds way better than a flat 4 stroke fart sound.
Well obviously... a 4 stroke needs almost twice the displacement to produce the same HP as a 2 stroke...
Two stroke all the way! All of my motocross bikes are two strokes.
I’ve got the 2023 fully unrestricted with the competition ECU and the CCU with the handlebar switch this new wr is a beast so forgiving in mistakes I’ve learned Turing the idle up a bit and keeping the rpm’s a little higher helps with the stalling and clutch lots of clutch in the technical shit
High quality video but a 250 2 stroke should kill a 250 4 stroke. You're comparing 2 completely different bikes as well. I'm a 2 stroke guy but I've had a KXF 250 and I have a 400 EX quad. The KXF 250 (yes it was the 1st year Kawasaki made it so it had some bugs) broke down so much I went right back to 2 strokes. The 400 EX is basically an XR 400 engine so it's bullet proof and not as high performance as a mx bike. I actually have a lot of respect for the Yamaha WR 250 and would like to own one some day soon. Let's say you compared a YZF 250 and YZ 250 the YZ would kill it the drag race.
Damn that 2 stroke is quick!!!!
I was raised on a 2 stroke and little has changed for me!
However they do make some nice 4 strokes now.
This was like an episode of Flight of the Conchords. Ridiculous, but worth it.
I think the biggest diff is that one of the riders is better :)
We already have know the answer to this for a long time... per displacement 2 strokes make more power than 4 strokes. But the 4 strokes are preferred in motorcross because they allow 250cc 4 strokes to race against 125cc 2 strokes and 450cc 4 strokes to compete against 250cc 2 strokes. Those rules greatly favor 4 strokes so that's why everyone moved to racing 4 strokes.
That’s completely false but ok 👌🏻
Drag racing the 2 stroke should always win. Hard enduro the 2 stroke wins because it's lighter and doesn't overheat going really slow. The 4 stroke is faster around a track because it has such a wide powerband. The 2 strokes have a very narrow powerband and it takes a lot of skill to keep them at full power when you are constantly changing speeds. The 4 stroke vibrates less and is more planted riding on a trail. You can hold a 4 stroke wide open, like on a fireroad, all day long. Try that on a racing 2 stroke and it will blow up in about 30 minutes. Here's the 250's I have owned: '75 Yamaha MX250, "76 YZ250, '77 YZ250 (Red Bud winner), '97 YZ250, '00 YZ250, '01 YZ250, '02 YZ250, '04 YZ250F, '09 WR250F, Current bike '17 WR250F. I prefer 4 strokes. They are easier to ride fast on varied terrain. I live in Utah.
Not true. I always try to ride at WOT on any 2 cycle.
Well from a riding stand point being a younger guy i absolutely loveee the 2t 250 its lighter very easy to wip around amazing for trails and there very easy to do maintenance on and a lot cheaper 4t 250 its fun it just doesnt have all theeat and potatoes that most want out of a bike its too smooth to be honest its fun but after a whilr the 4t just gets boring both fun bikes and you definitely have to have more respect with a 2t cause you actually have to ride the bike u cant just twist the throttle and put around like you can on a 4t
Take the test between a YZ125 2T and a 125YZF 4T...
There you will see how a 2T atomizes a 4T!
I grew up with a CR250 , and RM250 when mono shock first came on to scene. Two strokes were the best.
We need ktm killer ep 4!!!
I thought I was common knowledge to compare 250 2strokes to 450 4 strokes becuase of the power
Well they don’t in enduro racing... in Enduro GP 250 4 and 2 strokes compete against each other directly and the results are always very close.
@@Mockle07 He compared a 250 vs 250. The right comparison is 450 4 stroke vs 250 2 stroke. Or compare a 125 2 stroke vs 250 4 stroke. His comparison wasn’t valid.
@@stuntroll5363 read my comment again, then explain why the comparison is not valid.
That comparison started years ago with the Japanese bike companies heavily influencing the AMA to create the double displacement rules. It was stupid then and it’s stupid now. Race equal displacement.
Both insanely fast loved the video
should've been a wr450f for an equal displacement test against a 250 2t, 2t has double displacement to 4t, hence why 125 2t race 250f and 250 2t races 450f on amateur circuits
Why? 250cc each.
@@charalamboscharalambous8846 google it
I'm surprised the WR did as well as it did against the 2 stroke.
On dirt, it's as much about traction as it is about power. But you could see the two stroke was much faster later in the runs, where power mattered.
Back in 1982 my buddy had a Yamama 250 2 stroke, I had a Honda 250 4 stroke. He was quicker when he kept it running.
Im a better technical rider on these newer 2strokes, but faster on the 4 strokes and generally get better results racing cause I do less shifting and they seem a little more Stabil as the speeds go up. although a little heavier, they wear me out less. On knarly terrain, ktm/husky 2t get awesome traction at really low rpm where as 4t typically wont even stay running with much less than idle rpm.
2 strokes for life!🤘🏻
The gulf between two and four stroke off-road bikes has narrowed considerably since the 1970s when 2t meant narrow power and lightness and 4t meant heavy and big capacity. Now weight differences are marginal and power has really blossomed for small 4ts. All I can say is that for those tarmac stretches 4ts are happier with constant throttle than 2ts and 2ts just have that response. But if you like engine braking 4t is king. Spoilt for choice then?
2 stroke sound all the way!
Put a carb YZ smoker up against it and I bet it beats the 4 stroke every time.