The North Face Thermoball Eco VS. Patagonia Micro Puff - Jacket Battle

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 พ.ย. 2024
  • The North Face Thermoball Eco VS. Patagonia Micro Puff gear review Jacket Battle. Bother these jackets are synthetic insolation, but what is the beet one to go with? In this video we go over the differences and the pros and cons.
    #thermoball #micropuff
    Gear Used in this Vid:
    Micropuff: bit.ly/3AaCAhp
    Thermoball Eco: bit.ly/3tCc65T
    ________________________________________________________
    Camera gear:
    Drone - amzn.to/3vk0Afd
    Phone - amzn.to/3sMvU4n
    Pocket 2 - amzn.to/32GcJ1N
    Camera: amzn.to/2UERNYv
    Sigma 16 f1.4: amzn.to/3x0pIId
    Sony 10-18 lens: amzn.to/3zoJMFH
    Tamron 17-70 lens: amzn.to/3kGBhSt
    Tamron 11-20 lens: amzn.to/3BGMb0m
    Microphone - amzn.to/3tOm03J
    Windscreen - amzn.to/3dHRNgZ
    Tripod - amzn.to/3gAv3l2
    Joby Head - amzn.to/3tQwQGc
    studio lights: amzn.to/3xYET65
    ________________________________________________________
    If you'd like to help out this channel, shop with these links below:
    Backcountry: bit.ly/3k0QOf9
    REI: bit.ly/3z21PAX
    Osprey: bit.ly/2YMp1XF
    Hyperlite Mountain Gear : bit.ly/3nn3Aqo
    Outdoor Vitals: bit.ly/3yYFsfL
    Enlightened Equipment: bit.ly/3hlkyld
    Cnoc Outdoors: bit.ly/2XibwhP
    IKamper: bit.ly/3lzB1n7
    BioLite: bit.ly/3zgSoxK
    Helinox: bit.ly/3lF21l0
    Injinji: bit.ly/3nMjWc4
    MSR: bit.ly/3CobL9X
    Therm-a-Rest: bit.ly/3AmMzAl
    Garage Grown Gear: bit.ly/3BVfv2y
    Klymit: bit.ly/3C3JTaX
    BRoadout: bit.ly/3hms7rJ
    Hydro Flask: bit.ly/3nmC2RV
    GCI Outdoors: bit.ly/393YsyN
    Black Diamond: bit.ly/3lkLpyR
    Solo Stove: bit.ly/3xW8koy
    Tread Labs: bit.ly/3BVk7po
    Feathered Friends: bit.ly/3lpoaUr
    Nomadik: bit.ly/2Xvh5cp
    Platypus: bit.ly/3km5llO
    VSSL Flashlights: bit.ly/3hL4glw
    PackTowl: bit.ly/3CsIQl5
    SealLine: bit.ly/3hGlZuD
    What's with all the links? These affiliate links are the best way for me to invest money back into this channel to purchase equipment, gear and pay for trips. By clicking on these links to do the shopping you would do regardless, I get a minimal kickback from the sale. This is the best way to support this channel without it costing you anything more than what you would already be spending. Thanks so much!

ความคิดเห็น • 63

  • @powellcpr8747
    @powellcpr8747 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great review for these jackets, I own both and agree with most of this review.
    I own more TNF jackets, packs etc and the biggest selling point for me is how all TNF jackets will zip into a shell and gives me so many options depending on the weather, I like that option to zip in a vest, fleece and thermoball jacket.
    I do like my micropuff jacket over my nanopuff jacket and I usually get the hoodie version of either.

  • @asalynskii
    @asalynskii 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Hey man! Many thanks to you and your detailed comparisons and reviews. It helped me a lot to finally choose to get Patagonia Micro Puff. And yeah, your remarks about how jacket fit and temperature you are starting getting cold are my absolute champions. 😁

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Awesome a glad it was helpful. Thanks for watching

  • @stefslyfe
    @stefslyfe ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The nano puff here is probably the better option for wearing around town but if you’re going to wear it in the wilderness I’d opt for the brighter colors of the TNF in case something happens to you (makes it easier for rescue choppers to locate you when wearing bright colors).

  • @Mangold108
    @Mangold108 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the thermoball 2.0 seems to have much less stichings squares... also the quality of the sintetic insulation is different/better? thanks

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      This is the thermoballl eco 1.0, and haven’t tried the 2.0 yet, but hopefully I can get my hands on it soon and review it

  • @MrGratis80
    @MrGratis80 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I own at least 5 puff jackets but use mostly the Micropuff since the moment I bought it, around two years now. Wouldn't trade it for anything.

  • @ramsongewargis8736
    @ramsongewargis8736 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The thermoball looks awesome! Both are great jackets!

  • @gamerwhiz6847
    @gamerwhiz6847 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    There is something so sharp looking about TNF.

  • @Antonyoma
    @Antonyoma 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    It hard to believe that the micro puff keep to warm better than thermoball, i think that the weight of the fill is critical determinant

  • @Mangold108
    @Mangold108 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    THANKS to use GRAMS in weight too! LOVE!

  • @Mangold108
    @Mangold108 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    I have both now. Micropuff and Eco 2.0, both 2024 models. The thermaball is quite warm, actually, but a little more. but the ZIPPER, even though it is made by YKK, is plasticky and gets stuck at the bottom. a pitty because it is a cool jacket, and North Face makes much better color than Patagonia!

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I do need to get the 2024 thermoball, my is several years old so I’m sure it’s under went some updates and is probably time for a updated comparison

  • @gary7vn
    @gary7vn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Where synthetics really shine vis a vis down is the fact that they will dry much much faster than down. Drying down in the field is hell.

  • @UnlikelyHiker
    @UnlikelyHiker 3 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Both great jackets. I have, and love the micro puff. It is surprisingly tough, but fails when it comes to puppy teeth 🤦🏼‍♀️
    I guess that’s why they make gear aid tape...lol

  • @Mangold108
    @Mangold108 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    the ECO is the 2.0?

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      This is eco 1.0, which is the older model of thermoball. I haven’t looked at the newer eco 2.0 yet

  • @marcb1289
    @marcb1289 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    I think, it is not a very fair comparison: Patagonia Micro Puff jacket is far more technical, and aimed at harsh mountain activities, than TNF Thermoball jacket, which is more a "sportive streetwear insulated jacket". Prices are not the same at all, and TNF Thermoball jackets are far easier to find with huge sales (i have several, with and without hoods, and have never paid more than half the regular price, even on official TNF site; with Patagonia, it is harder to have more than 30% rebate).
    Comparison between Thermoball and Nano Puff seems more balanced, but even then, I find that Patagonia Nano Puff jackets are more technical and suited to sportive activities.
    But when it is about streetwear and time to time sports activities, TNF Thermoball can push forward its sturdiness.
    About its shape, you should go a size up; that's simple.
    In fact, for streetwear, I have chosen TNF Thermoball or Patagonia Nano puff; for mountain activities, I go for Patagonia DAS Light or directly a down jacket (with down treated for water repellancy); nothing has better ratio than real down.

    • @newjumpcityjosh9333
      @newjumpcityjosh9333 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Dude I’m shopping for this TNF jacket right now LOL if you have any sites you can link with good prices that you remember I’d greatly appreciate it. The one I’m looking at on the actual TNF site is the 2 piece jacket(Men’s ThermoBall™ Eco Triclimate® Jacket) and it seems perfect for me being in NYC. Warmth for winter and a nice lil spring jacket when it warms up.

    • @newjumpcityjosh9333
      @newjumpcityjosh9333 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also, im 6ft and not very skinny but also not close to being overweight so I’m assuming a large is a good size to go for. Not too worried about layering since the jackets come as a layered combo anyway.

    • @calebmelton5989
      @calebmelton5989 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sizing up doesn't necessarily work. Sometimes it's still just not suited to one's body shape. Both of these jackets are at home on the trail or the street.

  • @chrismanuel9254
    @chrismanuel9254 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Great video and comparison

  • @michaelsw0rd
    @michaelsw0rd 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    great review!

  • @williamlay2244
    @williamlay2244 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good video unfortunately I always have to go with Patagonia or Rab for fit I'm 6'4" and 220lbs. All the other companies like TNF seems like they were modeled by kids sleeves way too short. Maybe you can do a comparison of Patagonia Nano puff or Micro vs Rab Xenon.

  • @carloss7557
    @carloss7557 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I’m 5’10. I weigh 169. What size should I get for both

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think a medium would fit well. But depends on your arm length. Probably measure to be safe. Could be a large if u want to layer under it

  • @ADyess086
    @ADyess086 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Despite already owning the nano puff, I just grabbed the thermoball eco hoody for 44.99 in a Ross: Dress for Less. #winning!

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  ปีที่แล้ว

      Great deal

    • @Fduthoy
      @Fduthoy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      which would you recommend from both, and can you share why? I'm looking to buy one for a hiking trip

    • @ADyess086
      @ADyess086 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Fduthoy for me, of the two, the thermoball seems to be the warmest. Both do well as far as synthetic insulation in regards to moisture: sweat/rain. The nano puff is more casual and I tend to wear it “out” and to work more often. I own a few jackets and honestly can’t beat a quality down jacket.

    • @Fduthoy
      @Fduthoy 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      right on boss, thanks for the quick reply
      @@ADyess086

  • @XAVargasX0206
    @XAVargasX0206 3 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Good video. I don't really care if a jacket is "eco" or not, I care about two things...how it looks and will it keep me warm

    • @serious409
      @serious409 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s because you’re a selfish American narcissist lol

    • @XAVargasX0206
      @XAVargasX0206 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@serious409 Nope. I would assume most people think the same way when buying a jacket. Whether the jacket is eco or not wouldn't be a deciding factor on my purchase on jacket....

    • @XAVargasX0206
      @XAVargasX0206 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @VD Really.....You better watch out you might die..... 🤦‍♂️

    • @calebmelton5989
      @calebmelton5989 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@vdvdvdvdvdvdvd000but it's true. Most of us are tree huggers.

  • @oscrm1760
    @oscrm1760 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What weight do you have and what size are you carrying from the micro puff?

  • @monkeyluffy3555
    @monkeyluffy3555 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    how is the sleeve length between the two? I normally find TNF sleeves to be super long.. although my thermoball jacket sleeve is just right. was wondering if the Patagonia is the same sleeve length

  • @Mangold108
    @Mangold108 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    any news or better models/improvements in 2024? thanks

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      got the new micropuff for 2024, will be doing some reviews shortly with the updates.

    • @Mangold108
      @Mangold108 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      thanks @@BackcountryRenegade

  • @fogreyiz
    @fogreyiz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thermoball is a disaster if you want to use it while weather is cold. They are no way near to a down jacket at the same price tag.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i agree, basically paying for the fashion and name at this point

  • @lexuinosirg5491
    @lexuinosirg5491 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    27 ° never !!!!! Ridiculous ✌️

  • @danchatka8613
    @danchatka8613 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Surprised you said the Micro Puff is "super durable" Most other reviews mention how non-durable the Micro Puff is. Its flimsy fabric tears and snags easily in normal use.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Well it depends on the perspective. For me I see way more jackets then the normal person does and have had many with thinner denier. And I know how to treat those. Those who are used to thicker denier likely will say it’s flimsy. But in the ultralight world this is pretty durable

    • @wasdalosdickarchen
      @wasdalosdickarchen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      you ever heard of corrupt youtubers? Micro Puff is not durable at all. It looses fill and is only 10D Nylon. Its also known that it will lose insulation with time

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@wasdalosdickarchen 😂 for one who reviews lots of jackets, and many with much less denier, from a ultralight perspective it is durable for what it is. No one is saying its 10d is a great super durable material. Ultralighhters understand, which are likely those who are considering this in the first place

    • @danchatka8613
      @danchatka8613 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BackcountryRenegade Is Thomas Muller correct about the Micro Puff fill losing its loft/insulation? I haven't heard that. In fact, I thought a benefit of synthetic fill was retaining its loft longer than feather down. I bought a Nano Puff jacket and vest for my year round digital nomad life. Hoping they're worth the price. They feel excellent to wear. I love how light they are.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@danchatka8613 what he is talking about is the insulation leaking, which since the micro uses insulation that resembles down it could leak it like down does at the seams, it looks like strands of hair, but its actually insulation when you pull it. As far as loft, down maintains its loft much longer then synthetic over time. Synthetic naturally breaks down the more it is compressed and can not regain its loft, where down you can wash it and it can regain it. Where synthetic keeps its loft is when as jacket gets wet, synthetic maintains is much better and down will crumple up

  • @the-boring-car-guy
    @the-boring-car-guy ปีที่แล้ว

    Micropuff is such a lame name for such a cool jacket

  • @jorgenolbertoochoa7888
    @jorgenolbertoochoa7888 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    De fe