Patagonia Micro Puff VS Nano Puff: Synthetic Jacket Showdown

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 188

  • @25chadwick
    @25chadwick 4 ปีที่แล้ว +227

    Good video but the music is a little distracting… I’d recommend going without it or at least lowering the volume of it

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  4 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Thanks for the feedback

    • @DogWalksMe
      @DogWalksMe 3 ปีที่แล้ว +18

      Agreed. It’s way too loud

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      @@DogWalksMe it will be lower in my next jackets reviews. have a few coming soon

    • @thanosgatos
      @thanosgatos 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I totally agree. Great info, but difficult to follow. Since the music issue was already addressed, I'll make another recommendation: looking at the jackets only the whole time you're talking makes it difficult to follow along. Consider talking to the camera, and either picking up and showing the item you're talking about when necessary or adding some B-roll with it. Graphics with all the numbers you mention would really help, too. Keep it up and thank you for the effort!

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thanosgatos thanks for this. im posting a new jacket review today, and this suggestion played a roll. Always looking to progress, let me know what you think of it.

  • @krikitarmy
    @krikitarmy 4 ปีที่แล้ว +21

    Great video! You describe some important minor details that larger channels skipped over. You really helped me feel confident that I'll prefer the Micro over the Nano.

  • @nerigarcia7116
    @nerigarcia7116 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I went with the Nano because it was a little thinner, slimmer, and less puffy. Weight is marginal but I liked that it was thin yet warm and I also like the brick pattern stitching just because it's different from the rest. Plus, I got mine for just over $100 on sale so it was even a better bargain.

  • @johncappiello2747
    @johncappiello2747 3 ปีที่แล้ว +26

    I decided to go with the Nano Puff. I like the features better. The fabric being a little heavier weight in my opinion offers more abrasion protection. It's also extremely environmentally friendly.

    • @mikebuchholz347
      @mikebuchholz347 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i went nano puff hoodie

    • @dougieranger
      @dougieranger 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I ordered a Nano Puff Hoody an hour ago, how’re you guys getting on with it? Cheers.

    • @mikebuchholz347
      @mikebuchholz347 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@dougieranger outstanding!

  • @mamamacgyver
    @mamamacgyver 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I have the nano and after watching the video, I’m still ok with the nano. Thx for sharing this.

  • @Bouwentjes
    @Bouwentjes 3 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Nano for me, only because the more robust fabric.
    When the fabric was the same, I would go for the micro.
    Thanks for the review
    Helped me deciding

  • @02Lewist
    @02Lewist 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    Great review. For the use I will be looking at weight is not critical so will probably go for the Nano. Both appear to be great jackets but the Nano being more environmental friendly is a big plus.

  • @allencrider
    @allencrider 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I got a new synthetic jacket last year and settled for an Enlightened Equipment Torrid APEX. 7.75 oz. and has that 10D nylon shell. Doesn't have quilting. Not a fashion statement but was perfect for me on the PCT last summer. The Micro Puff's fill seems so much like real down that I thought it might lose it's insulating ability if it gets wet.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      I have it as well, and it’s going to be up in a video against the micro puff soon! It is warm, but I agree not a fashion statement

    • @captaincoyote1792
      @captaincoyote1792 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      That’s interesting, Reverend! I wasn’t aware that EE made a synthetic jacket! I know I’ve been ecstatically pleased with my Enlightened Equipment 20degree quilt (in fact, I’m in the process of ordering a 0degree one, as well). I may just have to look into the Torrid. Especially, as it proved itself on the PCT for you! Any idea of lowest temp you endured comfortably in the Torrid?

  • @michaelc.9200
    @michaelc.9200 3 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I have both, theyre both very nice jackets, micro puff is lighter and much warmer but when I hold the jacket to light source I can literally see light coming through the stitching, it will definitely rip very easily. I’ve been wearing nano puff at work for years and it is very durable. Don’t forget Patagonia will do repairs on these items in efforts to reduce carbon footprint of fashion industry.

  • @francisbombus3949
    @francisbombus3949 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Love both Jackets. For daily commuting, I use the Nano Puff Jacket because here the weight is not so important. It is also a bit more breathable. For longer bikepacking tours I prefer to take the Micro Puff Jacket.

  • @duckiekun9532
    @duckiekun9532 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Thank god I watch this video when I did. Manage to snag the Nano puff hoodless on sale for 100 on rei. Good video

  • @aminedirare3010
    @aminedirare3010 3 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Thank you! Very helpful.... please don’t pay attention to the people making a big deal about the background music. I enjoyed it. Thanks again 🙏

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Glad it was helpful! yep already made the change in lowering it in newer vids

  • @hammokkihermanni550
    @hammokkihermanni550 4 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    Cool review! I believe the pockets in Micro Puff are higher so they're not blocked by your backpack's hipbelt.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That makes a lot of sense. Thanks!

    • @VeggieHeather
      @VeggieHeather 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Its also a helpful feature for rock climbers. That way you can wear a harness while climbing and your pockets/stuff in those pockets don't get in the way 👌

    • @thelifeofjools8384
      @thelifeofjools8384 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ah.... that's a great help thanks ! Quite important too... 👍👍👍

  • @VeggieHeather
    @VeggieHeather 4 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I have both jackets in hooded versions and I love them both. I want to try the Macro puff as well 😄. But I live in Texas and rarely get outside Texas for any hiking. So the micro puff works very well for hiking trips, whereas the nano puff works better for city wear or at work. I love the range of motion in the micro.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Heather W. Nice! Yeah the macro looks interesting. Have yet to try it.

  • @artiecisneros4691
    @artiecisneros4691 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I've had the Nano Puff for a few years and have been really happy with it. I tried the Micro Puff and didn't like the way it fit. I have the old version of Micro Puff (2012) and prefer it over the new one.

  • @lifewithyo3143
    @lifewithyo3143 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great detailed video as I am about to decide which one I should purchase on this Cyber Monday. I echo other posters to lower the music a bit. Thanks so much!

  • @davenayak9592
    @davenayak9592 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Great product explanation and video demo. Super helpful comparison between Nano & Micro. Great job!

  • @martinbeno7
    @martinbeno7 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Went with micropuff hoody version, tried them both on and off several times, and must say micropuff is more comfortable, has bigger inner pockets and it looks better imho. Both of these jackets are great thogh and you made a great comparison!

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Great! And thanks for the kind words. Will be comparing more jackets in similar fashion

  • @rickyholloway8220
    @rickyholloway8220 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I like both. I just bought the Nano. I may get the 3 in one parka. I live in Texas so I am not sure how much I would be using it.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      sounds good. nano is a good option. 3 in one is worthy to consider if you see yourself using it in the snow

  • @TheBtotheetothen
    @TheBtotheetothen ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I have both. It really depends on your temperature preferences and how hot/cold you tend to run.
    Nano puff is my daily go to and perfect for that transitional weather. Also not bad for a ski trip to add an extra layer of warmth. While this is a nice tech layer - it does at a certain point meet its limits and get damn cold… so don’t expect a miracle here. Below freezing you will need to layer or get a warmer jacket.
    Micro puff is warmer in my opinion and it also packs down a great deal more. If I could pick one travel be all end all knowing I was going somewhere with variable weather it would likely be the micro puff. I’d probably also grab a shell for good measure and those two together would have you pretty toasty.
    I recommend both!

  • @Raevenswood
    @Raevenswood 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I love the Nano puff because I had one for the last 9 years and it just finally got to the point that it needs to be replaced. A little heavier but 9 years of use out of a jacket is amazing. It is made with sustainable materials and its longevity is also sustainable. I’m sure the micro puff is also durable because Patagonia makes quality products but a few ounces wasn’t enough to make me give up on picking up another nano puff. The nano is comfortable and it becomes more comfortable with time. I recommend it

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nano is a excellent choice. Enjoy

    • @Raevenswood
      @Raevenswood 3 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BackcountryRenegade I lied I have a disease and I bought a micro puff too lol

  • @scottyp3956
    @scottyp3956 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Nano puff is the best jacket on the market hands down

  • @BubbafromSapperton
    @BubbafromSapperton 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just got my Nano today, haven't even opened the package yet! I prefer low hand pockets and a zippered chest pocket so the Micro wasn't an option for me. Also have a Down Sweater Hoody which is very similar to the Nano... 🤗

  • @seanwalker6894
    @seanwalker6894 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Definitely the micro puff, but if I was in a store and there were 2 jackets Pink and grey, I'm going with the grey.

  • @Ninfreddo
    @Ninfreddo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Ok, a 2 y/o video and I didn‘t find anyone replying on the pocket placement?
    It‘s for better accessability when u r wesring a climbing harness or your backpack hip belt. So it‘s a feature for alpinist and hikers.
    When you tell me you prefer the lower pockets I assume u r mostly using it casually what is ok, but for someone looking for an insulating layer climbing outdoors or mountaineering I guess this would be a very helpful information about a helpful feature.
    Also everyone who said the micro seemes a bit burly of material, its for alpine use made from ripstop. Also patagonia has a lifetime warranty on their products. So if u r bot so unlucky to get stuck on a tree while jumping off of it and rip your jacket (which was a patagonia air hoody) it will be fine.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not really only for casual, These are higher then typical climbing jacket that still have raised pocket to make room for a harness like the proton. It just feels more unnatural, but it is good for what it does. Yes it has a life time warranty , but when your on a through hike you don’t have the luxury of an exchange to wait on which is why it needs to be mentioned, to be extra delicate. Anyways micro puff is a great jacket for what it is

  • @fernandogonzalezortiz1082
    @fernandogonzalezortiz1082 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Genial video!
    Me ayudo a entender las diferencias y yo elegí el nano puff
    Saludos desde México.

  • @adeelnissar5965
    @adeelnissar5965 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Love the review! Settled on the nano but don’t know if I should go for Medium, or Small like yours. What was your approximate height and weight in this video?

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      nano is still a great jacket. Im 5'7, 140 lbs. got the small

  • @manuel_winde
    @manuel_winde 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    4:32 in and I just paused it to buy the micro puff 😂 I got a nanopuff in the sale and love it but it’s a orange/gold colour and I just want a navy one that I can wear as a go to jacket this winter (I live in London so have bigger coats but for quick journeys to the shop or taking my daughter to school this will be fine.
    Thanks for the great video, really helpful

  • @popo7718
    @popo7718 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Nano puff just picked up one

  • @RosserRuns
    @RosserRuns 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I Just found and subbed. I look forward to supporting your content.

  • @captaincoyote1792
    @captaincoyote1792 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I own the following synthetics: Patagonia Micro Puff Hoody, the Rab Xenon X Hoody, and the Arcteryx Atom LT. Of the three, the Rab has been my “go to” for hiking/backpacking/bikepacking…. when wet and/or freezing wet conditions are forecast. The Atom? I use it only for active day hikes when temps are forecast for the high 30s to low 40s.. The MicroPuff? Nice jacket, but it just hasn’t passed merit in really cold AND wet conditions. Also, I wish that the MicroPuff had waist cinching. I really had high hopes for the Micro Puff, and while purchasing was an expensive lesson….I never, ever, NEVER pay full price for outdoor clothing. I buy everything post-season. Yep. It means weird colors, sometimes, maybe lack of correct sizing, but let’s face it: outdoor activities aren’t about catalog posing! This was a great review, as I’ve often wondered why Patty makes both!

  • @dutchbachelor
    @dutchbachelor 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hi there! First time viewer and I concur with some of the comments regarding music. You might want to check out a feature of your video editing software called "Auto ducking". And no, it doesn't quack... ;-)
    Otherwise great review!

  • @thdjjfsfh
    @thdjjfsfh ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Fantastic review, I went with the Micro because I already have something similar to the Nano. You're doing a great job comparing many jacket combinations that many of us have to choose between.

  • @2h145
    @2h145 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Awesome! Just wonder what size are you wearing in these? thanks

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      both of these are a size small men's

    • @tstark05
      @tstark05 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BackcountryRenegade what is your height/chest/waist dimensions if you don’t mind..? I’m on the threshold of 37” chest and 5’11” but so I’m thinking small. I really like how the Micro fits you!

  • @johncappiello2747
    @johncappiello2747 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I also own a Tres 3 in 1. It would be nice to see a review on that. It as well is an awesome jacket.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks! Yeah I’ll see if I can get my hands on one

  • @jimhenderson387
    @jimhenderson387 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Thanks for the useful information comparing the 2 jackets. Excellent job. I do have one suggestion, though. Ditch the music. It serves no purpose and I found it irritating. Of course, someone else might love the music. Such is life.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the feedback. Already made the changes in newer vids

  • @kgilliagorilla2761
    @kgilliagorilla2761 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My brain hurts now. Great review. Thanks.

  • @Bk6346
    @Bk6346 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I purchased the nano puff and it is surprisingly thin. For below freezing temperatures you will probably need an extra layer of clothing to stay warm.

  • @gary7vn
    @gary7vn 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cinch cords are great as the bellows effect is a thing, but most of them tend to hang down and get in the way. Elastic just might be a better solution.

  • @tcgregory7693
    @tcgregory7693 3 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The higher placed pockets are to accommodate a climbing harness. They also better accommodate a backpacking belt...

  • @Errcyco
    @Errcyco 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    I wish the face fabric on all these was atleast a 40D cause a rarely wear them with a shell over or get to hot. Having that 10D Pertex makes packing easier but you catch a bramble you’re donzo.
    With all that said though, I prefer the nano puff. Just seems to be more versatile in terms of use cases for me.. but that’s all subjective. I recommend going to an REI or EMS to try them on ahead of buying. Sizing is different than most brands and you’re definitely going to prefer one over the other in person.

  • @pio7763
    @pio7763 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Nano win in everyday use. I have it for 8years and still works. Mmicro is less durable. If you use it only for special occasion its ok.

  • @RosMyster
    @RosMyster 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Great quality review!

  • @JorgeOlivares23
    @JorgeOlivares23 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What size is your micro puff jacket? And how tall are you if you don’t mind me asking???

  • @LostBoy1026
    @LostBoy1026 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Micro puff is by far my favorite. Great video. Definitely made my choice through this video and all of the information and details you put into the video. Thank you

  • @AbstractMan23
    @AbstractMan23 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good, helpful review but you didn't say which one is warmer?

  • @greggfairfield2570
    @greggfairfield2570 4 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    I initially ordered the micro but returned it for a nano due to pocket placement. The pockets on the micro are oddly high and awkward. The micro also seemed a bit too fragile for me, but was a beautiful jacket nonetheless.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  4 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah, i thought they were a bit high too, but something i decided to deal with given the weight savings. I also thought that a bit fragile with the 10D, but has held up to anything ive thrown at it so far, i just try to be careful.

    • @Ninfreddo
      @Ninfreddo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The pockets are for use with a climbing harness or backpack hip belt. That way the pockets arent blocked.
      Also Patagonia gives lifetime wareanty on their products so I guess they are confident in the materials. If you use both jackets accordingly and with the respect their earn they both should last you a reasonable time of use

    • @MrAndrewClaycomb
      @MrAndrewClaycomb 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I own a lot of Patagonia gear and like what the company is doing, but it’s not really a lifetime warranty. Per their website “damage due to wear and tear will be repaired at a reasonable cost.”

  • @iTzShakenJoE
    @iTzShakenJoE 3 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I just purchased a micro puff. II destroyed my nano puff Spelunking/caving last year.. I ruined my Nice new jacket, and I destroyed my new Apple Watch.. never wear a nice watch and nice jacket in a cave.. lol

  • @proofpositive2379
    @proofpositive2379 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    i buy whatever is on sale. I don't care about the color way. I know i will wear it into the ground and love doing it.

  • @Shoreline.
    @Shoreline. 3 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    I got both I like the Nano better because the Micro makes me look fat

  • @UniteChopRise
    @UniteChopRise 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    If you could pick between micro puff , macro puff or Arcteryx Atom LT what would you pick for warmth during backpacking camping etc ?

  • @jasonnowwhat5041
    @jasonnowwhat5041 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The elastic on the bottom of the Micro just sucks for me. Much prefer the sinch cord setup of the Nano

  • @einfach_rausfahren
    @einfach_rausfahren ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Hi, is it possible that Patagonia added also a cord on the bottom of the micro puff recently?

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      SO i am happy to report in the newest version of the micro puff they finally added a hem cinch cord. I have both new versions of the micro and nano so I will be doing a updated video comparing the two soon

  • @freddynetwerk
    @freddynetwerk 3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Do you know if Patagonia are still producing the nano puff in hammonds gold? i cant find one anywhere i'm in the Uk thanks.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      i havent seen it available recently in that color, ive only seen the down sweater with it.

  • @JustinHEMI05
    @JustinHEMI05 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Patagonia has a couple colors on sale for 125 bucks shipped! Just snagged one in blue, which is my favorite color so score! (micro puff jacket, that is).

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      excellent deal

    • @ayamaikarim
      @ayamaikarim 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Thank you for the tip, I got the same jacket since it was the only color on sale.

    • @normhanson981
      @normhanson981 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      That’s a great deal , just paid £195 , $275 for a hooded nano , damn.

  • @ayamaikarim
    @ayamaikarim 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Do you only buy a jacket without hoodie & do you hike in all 4 season, what are your recommendations for cloths for day hike for someone who lives in the Pacific Northwest.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      For my 3 season jackets I like to have them hood less like these. And if I plan to use it as a layer I prefer hoodless as well plus it saves a few extra ounces not getting the hood . For my bigger winter jackets where it will get below 30 I’ll sometimes do a hood. For my winter mountaineering out for I use the north face summit L3 down jacket and it has a hood, since I had that I didn’t want another hooded jacket. Hope that helps.

  • @jeffreyrule8143
    @jeffreyrule8143 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you. Great video.

  • @crucibleknight6371
    @crucibleknight6371 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Both jackets are sweet

  • @abdullahmahmoud1845
    @abdullahmahmoud1845 3 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    What size are you wearing for the nano jacket and what’s your measurements if possible?!

  • @drewstoica3537
    @drewstoica3537 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey boss good video! Quick question, I live in Lake Tahoe where it snows quite often. I was torn between these 2 or the Fitz Roy down hoody. Any suggestions?

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      thanks, either would be a good option. it would come down to how you plan to use it. the difference in them all would be durability. the fitz roy will be the most durable, but also the heavier of the 3

    • @drewstoica3537
      @drewstoica3537 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BackcountryRenegade You’re a legend, thank you for the quick response. Will be watching more of your videos

  • @MrRaychard123
    @MrRaychard123 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What's the fill power on these jacket? Im planning to get a lite winter jacket, eying on the arctyrx cerenium LT hoodie at $349 with 850 fill power. A bit pricey wonder if the nano or micro puff from patagonia can match it

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Since it is synthetic it won’t be the same category of fill power as down. However, the micro puff best mimics down and is most similar and in my estimation will be a close comparison to 800 down fill power

    • @lpeters2777
      @lpeters2777 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I think you'd find the Arctyrx to be warmer than either of these, depends on your needs, level of activity, etc. I have looked at both of the Patagonia jackets and have their hooded Down Sweater, which is very similar to the Cerenium. I think the Sweater is likely warmer than these options, especially the Nano. The Nano is pretty light, Micro is said to be a little warmer.
      I ended up with the hooded Arctyrx Atom LT for my mid-weight instead of either of these due in part to fit. I find it warmer than anticipated, very comfortable, great fit and range of motion, but not at the warmth level of the Down Sweater, which was the plan.

  • @dtaboso
    @dtaboso 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    What would be the equivalent to a 800 cuins jacket with patagonia nano puff

  • @mikeroy6713
    @mikeroy6713 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    One of the more comprehensive reviews I’ve seen on these two but that music was too loud and distracting.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks for the feedback. Already made the change on newer vids

  • @eduardosilva1645
    @eduardosilva1645 ปีที่แล้ว

    Olá tudo bem ? Onde encontrar p comprar pois , gostei muito é bonita.

  • @danabella6540
    @danabella6540 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The downside of micro is the hem - its not adjustable. I went to nano.

  • @Mangold108
    @Mangold108 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I like the design of Nano but micro have a lot of pros

  • @Th3SundanceKid
    @Th3SundanceKid 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Arcteryx Nuclei FL won for me - thanks for the review though ;)

  • @Lemurs
    @Lemurs 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I’m 5’4 120 lbs Male, Should I go for a XS ?

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      It would be best to measure your arm length and compare it to the xs vs the small. I think the small would work but xs has shorter arms and smaller circumference around the chest. If you go with ads, I would get it from somewhere where if it is too small you can exchange it for a small just I case.

    • @Lemurs
      @Lemurs 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BackcountryRenegade I’ve had my micro puff for a year now and i can say i absolutely love it! And i went with the small, the fit is perfect! ❤️🙏

  • @alexduii
    @alexduii 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    After evaluating all aspects, still what's your choice on versatility? Thank you.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Personally it depends what your wanting it for. If it’s for strictly backpacking the micro puff is the better option. Ultralight and warm but not something I’d wear around town. But for multipurpose use in town and occasionally hiking, the nano is excellent, just weighs a tad more and is the cheaper option.

  • @alanrobinson2229
    @alanrobinson2229 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi
    I want to get one of these jackets,but can't try one on.
    Iam 6ft,medium build,what size should I go for online?

    • @wasdalosdickarchen
      @wasdalosdickarchen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      on their website you will find detailed size finder

  • @oscrm1760
    @oscrm1760 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Cual de los 2 protege mas del frio

    • @matts4852
      @matts4852 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Micro puff

  • @danielbrooks3452
    @danielbrooks3452 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is the name of the song in the video please

  • @Sain065
    @Sain065 4 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I like the micro more

  • @captainj7844
    @captainj7844 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Good Review - get rid of the background music

  • @gary7vn
    @gary7vn 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    "Water resistant" (they all say this) is an almost meaningless marketing term. In any event, don't even think about using a "water resistant" garment in, you know, the rain. You'll get wet. Other than that quibble, this was an excellent review.

  • @Whillie_Whonka1
    @Whillie_Whonka1 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Nano puff was a weird fit for me, micro puff a much better fit.

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I agree, nano is a bit boxier and tighter in the chest for me too for some reason

  • @arti1115
    @arti1115 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The music is really annoying, at least lower the volume of it :(

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  ปีที่แล้ว

      Yeah this was a old vid. Check for a updated one coming soon

  • @dinodini547
    @dinodini547 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    WICH size Do U HAve?

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Both are size small

    • @dinodini547
      @dinodini547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@BackcountryRenegade May i Ask your size? I m 172 cm x 72 kg.... Size m o s for me? Grazie from Italy

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dinodini547 I’m 173 cm and 64kg

    • @dinodini547
      @dinodini547 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BackcountryRenegade o, so maybe i Need medium? I m warry about the lenght

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@dinodini547 id recommend med for you

  • @vincbike9279
    @vincbike9279 ปีที่แล้ว

    Went Nano bc of durability

  • @anthonyshuey8351
    @anthonyshuey8351 ปีที่แล้ว

    "both excellent to use on a layering system" just say when you're layering 😂

  • @10ozGold
    @10ozGold ปีที่แล้ว

    That background music! Louder than the presenter. Why???

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol its a 2 yr old vid. Changes have been made. Look at my newer vids. Ill be redoing this in the next month or two

  • @datinsky69
    @datinsky69 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What is with that music??

  • @jurgschupbach3059
    @jurgschupbach3059 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mega Puff

  • @alexanderfriis1
    @alexanderfriis1 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Bagground music. Turn It down. Good video

  • @gummybear41283
    @gummybear41283 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    the background music is too loud!

  • @ipedros7
    @ipedros7 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Its beyond my understanding to add background music on videos like this? Its muddles the speech and its distracting. Especially as it added to the echo due to the audio quality. So unfortunately I didn't take anything from this and gave up within a minute. Anyhow, ATB.

  • @Mangold108
    @Mangold108 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    nice red color. I wish they make it on 2024...the color of 2024 season are horrible!

  • @bbanko3188
    @bbanko3188 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    You’re really nitpicking over 3oz? 😂

  • @timjones8837
    @timjones8837 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The music is deeply irritating and almost drowned the narrative on occasions. Detailed review, nevertheless.

  • @alphazerotactical1518
    @alphazerotactical1518 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dude your music is way too loud

  • @tobiasparal1919
    @tobiasparal1919 3 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Bruh the music is so annoying

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  3 ปีที่แล้ว

      yeah this was on of the originals, been fixed in newer vids

  • @hedefter
    @hedefter 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    please turn off this music. cant hear your voice

  • @MikaelHindsberg
    @MikaelHindsberg 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    How can micro be lighter than nano? Silly American company…

  • @jessek437
    @jessek437 ปีที่แล้ว

    This music is awful but great video regardless

  • @marcomolini9338
    @marcomolini9338 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Obnoxious background music

    • @BackcountryRenegade
      @BackcountryRenegade  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      lol thanks for the feedback, im well aware and this was a early vid. live and learn. new vids show the change. anyway, ill be recording this again soon, so check for that

  • @YazMH
    @YazMH 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Haha who gives a damn if its "eco friendly" or not.... Besides that remark, great video my friend, am planning to buy one Micro Puff from Ebay and send it to me here in México.. Northern México is a frigid place lately.

  • @christopherirwin3837
    @christopherirwin3837 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Anything but Patagonia,

  • @jeffpallister8651
    @jeffpallister8651 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    Get rid of the music very distracting