I got the Mazda cause its mid trims has nice leatherette, while hondas mid trims has cloth. Stepping up to leather in the civic would have cost more than the Mazda trim that I wanted.
You are presenting an unfair comparison. FWD Mazda3 is available and would fair more favorably in the fuel economy department against the Civic. Overall, your review seems hurried, doesn’t address other important facts like trunk capacity and pure performance numbers between the two.
@@DmnkRocks yea the car will have android auto, but pjone doesnt support it so i downloaded sože version that was out 3days ago i thinl it might be the latest update
Mazda3 is less practical, less fuel efficient, less space than civic, but feels more high end and is quieter. Sounds like you just described a basic luxury car.
@@mpg65 yes, but still not the best hatchback. Ppl dont care about the "luxury " part. The Honda can do everything else better. Which car is better now? Duh. The Honda, like I just stated why
So Honda can do everything better except for style, material quality (fit and finish), smother driving and availability of AWD? How about Honda fix their 1.5 liter engines and their CVTs and issues with manual transmission with Type R. Than we can talk about Honda being better....
I've drove both, and the Mazda 3 is my winner. I was getting 40mpg highway with the Mazda 3. On paper the Mazda 3 has less space, but its more practical. Put a bicycle or a stroller inside and you'll quickly see the Civic is only bigger on paper, it's not useable space.
No it's not. The rust issue and average reliability of the Mazda 3 in between 2004 and 2009 did not help for their reputation. It takes years to build a reputation in that industry.
mazda 3 for me.. is practicality that huge of a difference? how often do they haul loads of cargo or person in a month? do they always haul Titans or just small kids?
@@dornierserctajon8094 I'm usually a Honda guy, but Mazda for me too. I think the practicality can be a huge difference depending on how someone uses their car. For me, the clean exterior design, simple and premium interior, and driver-focused cockpit sold me.
@@imtheonehero9305 the FWD costs about what the civic costs, so it is more comparable, it also drives a bit differently (more peppy, lighter steering feel).
Test drove both recently. I largely agree with autoguides conclusions here. But seriously if rear seat room and trunk space are not a top priority Mazda 3 is a much nicer ride IMO. I mean, the rear door panels are soft and leather covered! Even the Tesla model s I was in a week ago didn't have that.
Test drove both...civic felt cheap. Only thing going for civic was the 1.5L turbo engine (though heard engine issues in colder climate areas)...the new 3 looked better styling wise, more quiet inside and better fit & finish plus the AWD. I didn’t really like Civic’s CVT...Mazda wins it for me!
Logλn L, the torsion beam setup on Mazda is not that bad...doesn’t affect handling negatively. May not be the ideal setup but it is what it is...I highly doubt though that the torsion beam is a deal breaker for many buyers.
@@ztekz I can tell in the very first corner when a car has torsion beam suspension, and it never fails to sicken me. It's just so unrefined and it completely kills any potential for predictable and good handling.
Logλn L, maybe to you you’ll notice but to the ave driver and in most cases majority of drivers won’t notice or care. Heck even a lot of drivers won’t even know there’s a torsion beam setup there...Only the enthusiasts really will notice the diff and that torsion beam will make that a deal breaker. Other than the few the 3 will still sell...
I believe the Mazda 3 hatchback is built in Japan, the Civic hatch is built in England. I prefer to buy a vehicle that's built in the country it originally came from if possible. If you are getting an automatic I would pass on the CVT; the Mazda has a conventional 6-speed auto. Check out how smooth the switches move on the Mazda, you'll be impressed! Good luck!
AutoGuide.com Mazda 3 Pros over civic: Premium cabin (knobs and switches belong in German car) Refined cabin Heads up display Transmission No need for premium gasoline to get to 180+hp Mazda3 is more expensive but looks way better and gives you more refinement.
@@louislopez55 People look at me like I'm crazy when I talk about a car being built in the home country of the brand. I have 2015 Mazda 6 GT, and one of my favorite parts about it is the fact that it's built in Japan. 🇯🇵 💪
I had own Mazda and Civic also. After driving the Civic, i can say I will never be back Mazda anymore, the feeling of driving, the engine is really give me much more than what Mazda bring to me
Stanley Nguyen that’s nice to hear, I got a 1.5 Civic last week. I was going to test drive the Mazda but liked the civic so much that I just went for it.
I have a Nissan Versa, 2016. CVT transmission started failing a few months ago. Almost a $1,000 in repairs and now part of a class action lawsuit. The Mazda 3 is looking mighty good simply because it doesn't use CVT.
Lmao. No shit. That doesnt make the 3 the better cR though. How can the 3 be better when the civic beats it in everything besides the interior materials and awd?
ImtheONE best oil diluting engine. Has interior materials in most models equal or below base Mazda3 level. Has a piece of crap CVT transmission, a transmission build because most drivers are ignorant and think that gas mileage is better then longevity. Turbo is also more problematic. There a reason that neither Mazda nor Toyota put a turbo in their compacts.
Mazda interiors are better than any Acura. Lexus is better depending on the model. I test drove the Mazda 6 and if you cover the logos, most people would say it was an Audi from the inside.
The Honda Civic doesn't cost "much" less than a FWD Mazda3. By comparing it to an AWD Mazda3, you are comparing apples to oranges. I mean, if you are going to throw out the concept of comparing similar types of vehicles, why not compare the Honda to a Bugatti Veyron?
Its cause mazda rear seats are cramped with no leg room. That's a no for me. I got 2 kids and one of them still in a car seat. Honda looks doesn't compete with Mazda 3, Mazda 3 looks amazing! But for the Price of Mazda 3 with not much room in the rear seat, also not enough room in the trunk space of a hatch compared to a Civic, Civic may look ricey, but everything else from price, gas mileage, space and room of the Civic, the Civic is actually the better car IMO.
You guys are reviewing the car as if they are a family station wagon ~ Mazda 3 is off the charts superb vehicle but you favored civic even though you found many faults in design and execution.... your review is blatantly flawed
No, it's not. The only thing the Mazda does better is the material inside and the look, which is subjective. The civic is the all around better car. It doesn't everything else better.
ImtheONE this is what people misunderstand when websites keep picking the corolla and Civic over the Mazda. They don’t listen/read why they picked them. People think that they picked the Civic/corolla over the Mazda because they’re better in every single way...? No. They picked it because they’re a better over all package. The Mazda has nicer interior materials but that’s about it
@@Fadic4 Wrong. Mazdas are always critic favorites. If you take The Car Guide for example, the Mazda 3 has won best compact car of the year, 4 out of the last 6 years and the new Mazda 3, won best new car as well (Civic won once). The Mazdas are known world wide for being much more athletic and responsive while the Honda CVTs just *simulate* gear shifts but Toyotas drive like god awful spongy trash. So to say that "it is just the interior materials that are better" makes me believe you are basing your conclusion solely on the video you just saw.
GorcStew Mazda’s have the best Interiors in their class, not the best overall package. Toyota and Honda are the Kings at making well rounded vehicles. Consumer reports reviews vehicles based on what their supposed to do. They don’t review SUVs based how sporty they are.. Which Mazda won North American car of the year? Here is a few comparisons... and awards.... www.motortrend.com/news/honda-cr-v-2018-suv-of-the-year/ www.cnbc.com/2018/01/15/and-the-north-american-car-of-the-year-is.html money.cnn.com/2016/01/11/autos/honda-civic-car-of-the-year/ th-cam.com/video/UYeq5tk08tk/w-d-xo.html www.consumerreports.org/suvs/2018-honda-cr-v-vs-2018-mazda-cx-5-suv-face-off/ www.motor1.com/reviews/222843/honda-crv-mazda-cx5-comparison/ www.motortrend.com/news/honda-cr-v-2018-suv-of-the-year/
@@AutoGuide the difference in price is mainly on the AWD and BOSE.. take those away and we have a good apples to apples comparison on price.. and you can't say that interior advantage of mazda is because it costs more.. it has great interior with the same price point..
If you're buying a car to keep for 5 or 6 years I would get the Mazda. The Honda 1.5L turbo engine has problems, the CVT sucks, and wouldn't you prefer something prettier? People buying cars in this class probably aren't looking for a lot of space. Finally, the price at the dealer is always negotiable (more at Mazda than Honda).
It was an interesting comparison because never thought the Civic would win. This just proved that people tastes are really diverse. To me Civic has more power but that's all about it. Fit and finish are really dated and buttons just over the place. CVT and styling?? In Australia, Mazda 3 is best selling compact vehicle then Corolla then Hyundai i30 (Elantra) . Civic is a distant gap behind.
Idk about everyone but mazda in general is the best looking compared to its competitors, and im sure with the right engine tune that mazda 3 can be a beast
I own a mazda 3 factory new, its a great car for a casual driver, but if u like sporty this car is doing great also, best car ive had for like 6 years,
the civic is the perfect car. a lot of space, great engine, great brakes, comfort, grip and control, very good consumption and very few other civic around (in italy).
Already test drove both car, and study all details needed in term of specs, fuel consumption, MPG & KM/H. done research on trunk space, leg room, interior and exterior design, material, size of the car, reliability, technology, cvt and skyactiv. The infortainment system, and even the price. The winner goes to mazda
So fun to drive! The Honda Civic I drove was so boring. I felt unhappy and when I was ready to sit down and sign I left saying I wasn’t happy with the car and said I can find something better. Got myself a Mazda 3
Um. The Honda sport requires premium. So for all of you stick shift fans, fuel costs are a wash. Auto users? Ignore what I said. I love how responsive Mazda's are. I have a GTI and it pisses me off how slow and how not eager it is to downshift. Again, stick shift for the win. Mazda makes one of the few automatics I like. Instant response.
Everyone complains about thick C-pillar on the Mazda3, but if you look past the fake window, the "actual" C-pillar of the Civic hatch, including the frame on the hatch, is just as thick.
You guys forgot the sport transmission option which allows drivers to essentially drive stick. The CVT in Honda is a let down, hesitates on the road, and has more recalls than Mazda
Wait... why compare the AWD version of the Mazda 3 with a FWD Civic? 🤦🏻♂️ Drop the AWD model and here comes all the benefits already mentioned PLUS better MPG to match that of the Civic as well as a lower price = The Mazda 3 is again, the freakin winner here. Lol.
Forgot to mention reliability. A turbo engine won’t last as long as compared to a NA engine. You may save 3k and a couple dollars on gas but once your turbo start giving problems, that’s where all your savings will go to. It eventually irons out. Buy what you like.
xxmobstrxx 853 mazda 3 potential to be modified? Lol bro come on the civic is the pinnacle Of that shit, if ur into that ricer stuff, get a miata or brz if ur serious of modding a car and go to the track beliieve me i learned the hard way
Jesus H Medrano I just don’t like the fact that everyone and their moms have a civic. Yea the civics are being modified left and right but I feel like a Mazda speed 3 may come out for this gen.
i believe the 3000 usd difference is mainly on the AWD and bose.. if you test the closest variant FWD with regards to price, the mazda is unbeatable.. exterior, interior and driving dynamics. the 1.5L turbo has issues by the way.. Honda's turbo has issues, google it up.. reliability? you can't really say mazda is unreliable,(time will tell). the honda is perceived to be more reliable, it is more of a subjective thought nowadays that mazdas are pretty reliable as well as honda and toyota.. consumer reports(google this as well) mazda as top 3 next to toyota and lexus which is by the way under the same wing, basically mazda is top 2 right?.. forgive me for bringing this up, but i think this review is very flawed.. i'm sure i'm not the only one who disagrees with the verdict and how you came up with it. you should have put point and weight system on every category.. Exterior? civic is too futuristic and too aggressive, i'm kinda lost in the design of the civic. it is trying to be something it isn't with the fake vents.. interior? civic is just plain outdated.. who said practicality can't come with good design of interior? honda's interior is worse than toyota.. i know this is a budget segment, but budget doesn't mean cheap looking.. it doesn't have to be ugly or cheap looking if it is a budget segment.. toyota for god's sake makes the vios so cheap looking(exterior).. are they just that too lazy to come up with a better exterior design? simple because it is not a luxury or up market segment?.. honda has good looks but not so good interior.. transmission? CVT vs 6AT il leave it there.. if you give me a manual civic and a manual mazda 3 we may have an argument but if CVT vs 6AT there isn't really a case.. Power and driving dynamics? these two are made as daily drivers, not as race cars.. they both have sporty feeling and that is good enough.. i'm not a honda hater or a full pledged mazda lover, but i just think you are giving the civic too much credit for something that is not necessarily true.. it more practical because it is bigger but if you want a big sized car go for an suv.. not every person who is in the market of the civic and mazda 3 are 6 feet and above in height.. not everyone wants or needs to haul 5 persons every day.. at the end of the day, if budget wasn't a concern almost all of us would want a bugatti/lambo as cars and huracan as compact suvs, rolls royce for business matters, a wrangler for off roading, a RV bus for long recreational drives and etc.. what im trying to say is that not one car in that group is a complete package right? there is always a trade off.. what mazda has done in the compact car segment is very good.. a good looking car, an interior design that rivals base luxury cars, a good enough engine that runs well, a good enough space for most, a cargo that can't really fit a cow but still is enough for its intended purpose.. i believe the civic only have space and mileage as its clear advantage against the mazda and reliability is too subjective.. i think that advantage against the mazda is not that great that it evens out the score of mazda's advantage in exterior and interior.. can't compare price for AWD and FWD though.. your doing mazda an injustice!
Have owned 2018 SI a few months now. Love this car. Performance matters to much to me. Every Civic will out perform that Mazda. Now, counterpoint! That Mazda is gorgeous! Flat out a better looker than Civic! Inside and out. Especially inside. Still don't care though. Civic's are to much fun, at a cheaper price!
@@kylenewberry8598 Brother? I hope you're right but I know Mazda can't afford do it. If they did? It wouldn't be the brawler the last Mazdaspeed 3 was. One can always hope? But the way Mazdas been doing things the last few years, I wouldn't bet on it.
Keith Jackson it's confirmed the engine fits, and that awd can have a Manual. Would only be a matter of tuning the ecu. Or they could take the 2.5 and tune it like thru did the 2.0 in miata. They would give maybe 215/220 hp but With that linear powerband. So it would be minor $ and effort for mazda to do so. Plus they've been adding that engine to the cx5 and 6 recently.
Cvt transmissions suck, the Mazda looks better, drives better, and has awd. If interior space is what you’re looking for then the compact segment isn’t for you. It really doesn’t matter in this segment except for reviewers who claim that a couple of inches make or break a car in a review 😂. Face it for the next few years the Mazda is the best compact until the richer bigger companies can update their cars completely twice before Mazda can once. An appliance vs a niche drivers car. I know which one i’m going to choose.
I owned Toyotas and Mazdas and never had problems. I owned a Honda Civic and man that cvts is a break on the back with the cvt. It gave me engine problems and something with a gas pump leaking and some missing bolts on the bottom right side. Never buy Cvts stupid engine ideas.
Id love for Honda to expend Civic Si lineup and offer a hatchback. That would honestly be a perfect combination of practicality, driving dynamics and affordability. I like what Mazda is doing with the interior and awd option is great too, but after test driving Si I fell in love with the its crisp handling, balance and sporty interior, just can't get over sedan's styling and coupe is not a practical option for me. We may see Mazda 3 speed but I have a feeling that car is gonna be in high 20's low 30's
I did not cross shop the Mazda when I was recently shopping for a compact car because it was just coming out and not yet available, and too expensive. I did cross shop Civic and the new Corolla hatch. I ended up with the Corolla hatch for overall interior comfort, fuel economy, and price for what you get. I love my Corolla hatch. It should be noted if you get the Sport Touring coupe Civic (the one with 180HP) you are required to run premium fuel. Another reason I did not want that car.
@@AutoGuide Honestly, the way it looks. I got an XSE fully loaded in blizzard pearl. It is a great looking car, both inside and out. Aside from the looks, I'd have to say my next favorite thing is the interior comfort. I love the seats, it's a great place to spend time.
I was in the same exact position, but went with the Civic. Liked the interior and drive better, but it was a tough call. I think the Mazda 3 if out at the time would have made the decision even thougher lol
If you want gasoline mixing with your engine oil, the Honda is the car for you. How is it that a Japanese company can make an engine so bad? It's too bad that Autoguide made the Honda the recommendation in this video because now a ton of people are going to go to the Honda dealership and get screwed over with a lemon after a few years.
all DI engines get a bit of fuel in the oil it is normal, the CRV had more problems with this, i hear its rare in the civic, i live in cold weather state have a 2 mile communte and had zero issues with dillution but honda still extended my warranty for a year
I’m so torn between these 2. Leaning towards the civic, although I haven’t driven it yet. However, I have driven the Mazda and it felt a bit closed in, if that makes sense?
As an owner of a 2019 Type R, I will tell you most of these guys complaints are a joke. The civic looks very good and the angles give it some good aggression. I can easily sit behind my self and easily put my son's car seat behind with plenty of room for his feet to swing back and forth on. 16 buttons to change the radio station.....get out of here, this review is terrible. I can see why the Straight pipes are blowing up and have passed Autoguide.
Not sure ai like the new direction Mazda is going. They are going considerably more upmarket, they are leading in fuel economy and what happened to room in the backseat? And with the new turbo, compression ignition engines coming soon, I fear Mazda might lose their reputation for reliability.
Same. Before I saw it in person Civic was top on my list. But when I went to test drive, I was very disappointed. The Mazda hatch is a lot better looking in person and online! Its fun to drive and handle!
I'd go Civic with a manual and save a ton of money while getting a better driver with more practicality. The new Mazda 3 just traded too much of its soul for luxury. Way expensive now as well.
Lol so after redesigning the Mazda 3, they managed to build a more expensive, less efficient, smaller car than the segment leader. No wonder Mazda sells the least cars in this category. I would love to see a comparison between the new n old Mazda 3
That’s because they refuse to use a piece of shit CVT to get fuel mileage. So if you like fuel economy and are fine with your transmission breaking down by all means buy a CVT.
Unfair to compare a 1.5li Turbo with a 2.5li NA. Civic is bound to win in fuel economy comparison with a much larger engine. Civic is good but Mazda is better and worth it.
The way Sebastian trash talked Mazda’s driving dynamics speaks to his lack of knowledge on the engineering that went into it for the new model. It’s superior to Honda’s. They haven’t revised the civic since 2015 so it’s behind in the segment. Mazda’s driving and handling are top of the class. Honda’s car is good looking but a lack of volume knob, busy interior, and outdated look just proved the Mazda is the better choice overall.
I think the Mazda 3 could use a smaller 1.5 or 1.6L turbo to get better mileage as the Civic. AWD is a good extra to have, you don't need it all the time, but is good enough to have it
Is it just me or do Automotive journalists seem really irritating and somewhat whiny in my opinion. To be honest I prefer the Kia Forte you get just as good gas mileage the engines just Pepe enough to get you going it feels comfortable rides well handles well and does everything these other cars do for less money. In fact if you get the Forte LX Fe with the automatic you're getting 31 City 41 Highway that's a sold in my book.
The Civic needs premium for those fuel economy numbers, and you used the Mazdas AWD fuel economy figures which is horseshit. Do a real world test of FWD vs FWD on 87 for both.
I think Civic is more unique looking, cars now have that same grill styling, thats why bought a Civic, never drive a Mazda before, but I bet the experience is better than a Honda
What do you do when you can’t compete? You offer all wheel drive. Which is nice if you’re in snow but also cost of maintenance and unreliability goes up. Not to mention fuel economy gets worse. It’s hard to beat a Honda.
The dude loses all credibility when he calls the Mazda infotainment system tiny. That thing has an 8-inch display and the knob control in the center is not only way more stylish but is way more practical and safe to use while driving. Touch screen operation is table for driving.
Get the cheaper option of both, where you will still get most of the high quality materials and by far beat the Honda in price/value. Most buyers after a 20k car wont pay for the extra of the bose system and the other expensive add on you have in the ones you tested. Test the car your audience will buy.
They complain when Honda takes buttons and complain when they give them back. Another day in modern motor journalism...
Mazda, for a non luxurious car brand... it looks more luxurious than others in it’s class.
I got the Mazda cause its mid trims has nice leatherette, while hondas mid trims has cloth. Stepping up to leather in the civic would have cost more than the Mazda trim that I wanted.
As always
Hey! Let us know what you think about the new Mazda3 and the Civic Hatchback!?
Mazda 3 hands down. Better reliability, transmission, built quality and feel, cheaper fuel (reg. vs premium)
You are presenting an unfair comparison. FWD Mazda3 is available and would fair more favorably in the fuel economy department against the Civic. Overall, your review seems hurried, doesn’t address other important facts like trunk capacity and pure performance numbers between the two.
I have a 2019 Mazda 3 and the Android Auto just had an update that fills the whole screen. At first it was just a portion but now its way better!
Can u say what update it is? Cause in my country android auto isnt avaliable so i have to update manualy. Thanks
@@raginjunker the dealer has to do it
@@DmnkRocks yes but dealer has nothing to do with my android phone :D
@@raginjunker sorry - did not read the whole text ^^ - was thinking of the older models - where android auto has to be installed by the dealer ^^
@@DmnkRocks yea the car will have android auto, but pjone doesnt support it so i downloaded sože version that was out 3days ago i thinl it might be the latest update
Love the new minimalism of Mazda. Just love it
Yup yup yup
Civic looks so much more stylish
Mazda3 is less practical, less fuel efficient, less space than civic, but feels more high end and is quieter. Sounds like you just described a basic luxury car.
This is also AWD. Comparison is not good. I get his 40s in my 14GT
@@mpg65 yes, but still not the best hatchback. Ppl dont care about the "luxury " part. The Honda can do everything else better. Which car is better now? Duh. The Honda, like I just stated why
@@mpg65 it is fair. Top of the line. Dumbo.
So Honda can do everything better except for style, material quality (fit and finish), smother driving and availability of AWD? How about Honda fix their 1.5 liter engines and their CVTs and issues with manual transmission with Type R. Than we can talk about Honda being better....
I've drove both, and the Mazda 3 is my winner. I was getting 40mpg highway with the Mazda 3. On paper the Mazda 3 has less space, but its more practical. Put a bicycle or a stroller inside and you'll quickly see the Civic is only bigger on paper, it's not useable space.
Mazda is an underrated brand.
Mazda has the best racing pedigree of all car makers these days
skilleris how
@@Fadic4 rotary= skyactiv, g, x.
No it's not. The rust issue and average reliability of the Mazda 3 in between 2004 and 2009 did not help for their reputation. It takes years to build a reputation in that industry.
Sit inside the Mazda 3, cover the logo on the steering wheel, and you'd think it's a premium German car with its luxurious interior.
Everyone likes to say how it's ten thousands of dollars more than it's price. Yeah right
But then you switch it on and the illusion comes crashing down.
What about when you hit a pothole with that torsion beam? How about when that unrefined 6 speed auto starts acting weird in low speeds lol.
@@Fadic4 Not to mention what happens when a comet comes crashing through the atmosphere and lands on the car's roof!
Fadic4 and how about cvt🙊
Should have had the FWD Mazda for a better apples-to-apples comparison. Or at least used the FWD for price and fuel economy comparisons.
mazda 3 for me.. is practicality that huge of a difference? how often do they haul loads of cargo or person in a month? do they always haul Titans or just small kids?
@@dornierserctajon8094 I'm usually a Honda guy, but Mazda for me too. I think the practicality can be a huge difference depending on how someone uses their car. For me, the clean exterior design, simple and premium interior, and driver-focused cockpit sold me.
Exactly. I think mazda will drop the turbo in it. Of course though people will still complain
Awd lost. No point in using the fwd.
@@imtheonehero9305 the FWD costs about what the civic costs, so it is more comparable, it also drives a bit differently (more peppy, lighter steering feel).
These guys are light on scientific facts & heavy on impressions. They put on a show & want to be loved, that's obvious. I won't be back for 2nds.
They want to be top gear
The intro was annoying
yeah this video is full of garbage takes, I just wasted 6 minutes watching this and got nothing out of it
I own a Civic 2018 LX and upgraded it into a Mazda 3 AWD Sport hatchback. 😍
is it better than civic? How's the cargo space compares to civic with rearsseats down?
@@Cutecumball apparently it’s 8 inches less space than the regular sedan Mazda for the hatchback which doesn’t make sense.
Mazda 3!!!!!!!the best!!!!!!🔥🔥
Hands down the Mazda looks better
As if that's even a competition.
No one cares about looks. Ppl will buy the civic hatch becuz it's the better car
You keep your hands to yourself!
The hatch with no character lines or shoulder looks weird....the sedan is better looking
@@imtheonehero9305 ikr
Test drove both recently. I largely agree with autoguides conclusions here. But seriously if rear seat room and trunk space are not a top priority Mazda 3 is a much nicer ride IMO. I mean, the rear door panels are soft and leather covered! Even the Tesla model s I was in a week ago didn't have that.
i still have my 2014 mazda 3.. fun car and reliable..
I still have my 04 mazda 3 also fun and reliable
Test drove both...civic felt cheap. Only thing going for civic was the 1.5L turbo engine (though heard engine issues in colder climate areas)...the new 3 looked better styling wise, more quiet inside and better fit & finish plus the AWD. I didn’t really like Civic’s CVT...Mazda wins it for me!
Nice torsion beam.
Logλn L, the torsion beam setup on Mazda is not that bad...doesn’t affect handling negatively. May not be the ideal setup but it is what it is...I highly doubt though that the torsion beam is a deal breaker for many buyers.
@@ztekz I can tell in the very first corner when a car has torsion beam suspension, and it never fails to sicken me.
It's just so unrefined and it completely kills any potential for predictable and good handling.
Logλn L, maybe to you you’ll notice but to the ave driver and in most cases majority of drivers won’t notice or care. Heck even a lot of drivers won’t even know there’s a torsion beam setup there...Only the enthusiasts really will notice the diff and that torsion beam will make that a deal breaker. Other than the few the 3 will still sell...
Logλn L are you going to every comment thread just to talk shit about Mazda? Found the Honda spokesperson lol who hurt you?
Test driving both today to make my final decision! Leaning towards Mazda 3
Nice, let us know what you think!
I believe the Mazda 3 hatchback is built in Japan, the Civic hatch is built in England. I prefer to buy a vehicle that's built in the country it originally came from if possible. If you are getting an automatic I would pass on the CVT; the Mazda has a conventional 6-speed auto. Check out how smooth the switches move on the Mazda, you'll be impressed! Good luck!
AutoGuide.com
Mazda 3 Pros over civic:
Premium cabin (knobs and switches belong in German car)
Refined cabin
Heads up display
Transmission
No need for premium gasoline to get to 180+hp
Mazda3 is more expensive but looks way better and gives you more refinement.
@@louislopez55 People look at me like I'm crazy when I talk about a car being built in the home country of the brand. I have 2015 Mazda 6 GT, and one of my favorite parts about it is the fact that it's built in Japan. 🇯🇵 💪
I had own Mazda and Civic also. After driving the Civic, i can say I will never be back Mazda anymore, the feeling of driving, the engine is really give me much more than what Mazda bring to me
Stanley Nguyen that’s nice to hear, I got a 1.5 Civic last week. I was going to test drive the Mazda but liked the civic so much that I just went for it.
They Both look great, i would go with the Mazda just because of the CVT and Rear end of the civic .
Mazda 3 🧡
I have a CVT in my current car and I’ll never buy another car with CVT again. Hate it!
why?
I have a Nissan Versa, 2016. CVT transmission started failing a few months ago. Almost a $1,000 in repairs and now part of a class action lawsuit. The Mazda 3 is looking mighty good simply because it doesn't use CVT.
@@Nostalgic90s765 you knoe what never fails? A normal shifter.
I'll take Mazda any old day.
You're right the Civic is the "better" car but I'd still walk right past it and get the 3 lol
Lmao. No shit. That doesnt make the 3 the better cR though. How can the 3 be better when the civic beats it in everything besides the interior materials and awd?
ImtheONE best oil diluting engine. Has interior materials in most models equal or below base Mazda3 level. Has a piece of crap CVT transmission, a transmission build because most drivers are ignorant and think that gas mileage is better then longevity. Turbo is also more problematic. There a reason that neither Mazda nor Toyota put a turbo in their compacts.
It’s sad when Mazda has a better interior than Acura.
Nope.
@@MrGunzngirlz yup.
Totally agree. Acura is going nowhere. Only the RDX has a somewhat modern interior.
Forgot NSX?
@@VQ25DETT The NSX interior design looks like something you would find in a regular Honda.
Mazda interiors are better than any Acura. Lexus is better depending on the model. I test drove the Mazda 6 and if you cover the logos, most people would say it was an Audi from the inside.
do you agree on the verdict?
DangerousDan you do realize you only get this interior on the highest spec of Mazda 3
Bullshit, but ok.
Mazda circlejerk
The Mazda 6 signature was nice af. It's nicer than you think for the price.
Mazda3 hatchback all the way, just love it for whatever reason 🏎🏎🏎👍👍👍
Unless the all new Civic is release, it's not a timing for comparison. 19 Mazda3 is too irresistible for Civic to compete
The Honda Civic doesn't cost "much" less than a FWD Mazda3. By comparing it to an AWD Mazda3, you are comparing apples to oranges.
I mean, if you are going to throw out the concept of comparing similar types of vehicles, why not compare the Honda to a Bugatti Veyron?
Lol Honda would still win because its just the best option xD
I like how they compare the Mazda's rear seats to the Honda's infotainment system.
Its cause mazda rear seats are cramped with no leg room. That's a no for me. I got 2 kids and one of them still in a car seat. Honda looks doesn't compete with Mazda 3, Mazda 3 looks amazing! But for the Price of Mazda 3 with not much room in the rear seat, also not enough room in the trunk space of a hatch compared to a Civic, Civic may look ricey, but everything else from price, gas mileage, space and room of the Civic, the Civic is actually the better car IMO.
You guys are reviewing the car as if they are a family station wagon ~ Mazda 3 is off the charts superb vehicle but you favored civic even though you found many faults in design and execution.... your review is blatantly flawed
No, it's not. The only thing the Mazda does better is the material inside and the look, which is subjective. The civic is the all around better car. It doesn't everything else better.
@@imtheonehero9305but the civic is so hugly
ImtheONE this is what people misunderstand when websites keep picking the corolla and Civic over the Mazda. They don’t listen/read why they picked them. People think that they picked the Civic/corolla over the Mazda because they’re better in every single way...? No. They picked it because they’re a better over all package. The Mazda has nicer interior materials but that’s about it
@@Fadic4 Wrong. Mazdas are always critic favorites. If you take The Car Guide for example, the Mazda 3 has won best compact car of the year, 4 out of the last 6 years and the new Mazda 3, won best new car as well (Civic won once). The Mazdas are known world wide for being much more athletic and responsive while the Honda CVTs just *simulate* gear shifts but Toyotas drive like god awful spongy trash. So to say that "it is just the interior materials that are better" makes me believe you are basing your conclusion solely on the video you just saw.
GorcStew
Mazda’s have the best Interiors in their class, not the best overall package. Toyota and Honda are the Kings at making well rounded vehicles. Consumer reports reviews vehicles based on what their supposed to do. They don’t review SUVs based how sporty they are..
Which Mazda won North American car of the year?
Here is a few comparisons... and awards....
www.motortrend.com/news/honda-cr-v-2018-suv-of-the-year/
www.cnbc.com/2018/01/15/and-the-north-american-car-of-the-year-is.html
money.cnn.com/2016/01/11/autos/honda-civic-car-of-the-year/
th-cam.com/video/UYeq5tk08tk/w-d-xo.html
www.consumerreports.org/suvs/2018-honda-cr-v-vs-2018-mazda-cx-5-suv-face-off/
www.motor1.com/reviews/222843/honda-crv-mazda-cx5-comparison/
www.motortrend.com/news/honda-cr-v-2018-suv-of-the-year/
I just bought a leftover 2019 Mazda3 with $6200 off sticker!
Honestly, the Civic feels CHEAP to the Mazda3. And the rest of the segment cannot match it either.
The Mazda3 does feel more expensive than the Civic, but it does cost more, so if it felt cheaper, we would not be happy about it. Thanks for watching!
Honda is still more reliable than the mazda though.
But so does Civic right? Cheap rear torsion beam setup...
@@gigi9467 🤣😂👎🏼
@@AutoGuide the difference in price is mainly on the AWD and BOSE.. take those away and we have a good apples to apples comparison on price.. and you can't say that interior advantage of mazda is because it costs more.. it has great interior with the same price point..
If you're buying a car to keep for 5 or 6 years I would get the Mazda. The Honda 1.5L turbo engine has problems, the CVT sucks, and wouldn't you prefer something prettier? People buying cars in this class probably aren't looking for a lot of space. Finally, the price at the dealer is always negotiable (more at Mazda than Honda).
It's not a wide scale issue if it were Honda would have recalled it
Also the Mazda feels smaller than compact so the Civic is the all-around better choice
@@ALEX-sh3tx not really. Depends on what you want
@@mpg65 if you buy a compact car you should get compact car space...the Mazda 3 feels like a subcompact
@@mpg65 I would personally get the KIA Forte
Not fair, if you take the awd out the price drops and the fuel economy improves on the Mazda. Yes more space in the civic that’s it.
For more space you can get the sedan also
It was an interesting comparison because never thought the Civic would win. This just proved that people tastes are really diverse. To me Civic has more power but that's all about it. Fit and finish are really dated and buttons just over the place. CVT and styling??
In Australia, Mazda 3 is best selling compact vehicle then Corolla then Hyundai i30 (Elantra) . Civic is a distant gap behind.
I like the feeling of a 6 speed auto and not cvt
So get a manual.
Idk about everyone but mazda in general is the best looking compared to its competitors, and im sure with the right engine tune that mazda 3 can be a beast
We still hope they're gonna do a Mazdaspeed3. Please please please please do it, Mazda!
Most ppl will not deny that. But that doesnt make the Mazda the better car.
I own a mazda 3 factory new, its a great car for a casual driver, but if u like sporty this car is doing great also, best car ive had for like 6 years,
Has far as I see it the Civic lost it's crown back in 2014 when the third Gen Mazda 3 came out.
Mazda all the way
Ill take the Mazda cause of how much sexyer it is and cause it's much more luxurious and funnest car out of the two
Why not compare fwd to fwd?
Because the sky-g 2.0 is really shit.
165hp is no match to the homda 1.5 turbo 182 hp.
@@ht880910 there's no Sky-G 2.0 in the US
ht880910 the 2.0L hasn’t been around in the US for years. Every Mazda comes with 2.5L standard
@@gewdvibes what a great country.
There are no 2.5L in Taiwan ,and. 2.0L fwd sells even more expensive than 2.5L in US.
Fuxk you mazda!
ht880910 - Sky G 2.0 is a WINNER: it’s in the 2019 Miata, w 0-60 time of 5.6.
You didnt mention the civic hatch needs premium fuel for those numbers...
😐🤨
So buy premium fuel. You poor?
@@MrGunzngirlz people buying a 25k car care.. You stupid?
@@omgitsme435 Good reply man 👍
@@omgitsme435 no one cares. The civic is still cheaper. It's the better car fool
The Mazda has a standard auto, no CVT junk.
civic with the cvt with absolutely murder the mazda's auto on any kind of acceleration, which if you're buying 180+ bhp car will matter to you.
Dumkopf.
the civic is the perfect car. a lot of space, great engine, great brakes, comfort, grip and control, very good consumption and very few other civic around (in italy).
Already test drove both car, and study all details needed in term of specs, fuel consumption, MPG & KM/H. done research on trunk space, leg room, interior and exterior design, material, size of the car, reliability, technology, cvt and skyactiv. The infortainment system, and even the price. The winner goes to mazda
So fun to drive! The Honda Civic I drove was so boring. I felt unhappy and when I was ready to sit down and sign I left saying I wasn’t happy with the car and said I can find something better. Got myself a Mazda 3
Um. The Honda sport requires premium. So for all of you stick shift fans, fuel costs are a wash.
Auto users? Ignore what I said.
I love how responsive Mazda's are. I have a GTI and it pisses me off how slow and how not eager it is to downshift.
Again, stick shift for the win.
Mazda makes one of the few automatics I like. Instant response.
Still not getting used to Honda’s unibrows and overdone designs
true!@ericj305
UniBrow omg that’s spot on
@@nextleveljourney6612 And I can't unsee it now lol
Best looking car....
Everyone complains about thick C-pillar on the Mazda3, but if you look past the fake window, the "actual" C-pillar of the Civic hatch, including the frame on the hatch, is just as thick.
You guys forgot the sport transmission option which allows drivers to essentially drive stick. The CVT in Honda is a let down, hesitates on the road, and has more recalls than Mazda
Wait... why compare the AWD version of the Mazda 3 with a FWD Civic? 🤦🏻♂️
Drop the AWD model and here comes all the benefits already mentioned PLUS better MPG to match that of the Civic as well as a lower price = The Mazda 3 is again, the freakin winner here. Lol.
Civic top of compacts as far as you can remember? Must never heard of the Golf
In fact, the 3's screen is 8.8 inches, the largest in the segment.
Doesnt look that big sense it's too long
ImtheONE that’s because it’s not as distracting to use as others.
Mazda 3 100% most better car!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Civjic like toy!!!!!
Soulla Aristotelous you lied and in a straight line the civic destroys it
Ew a Mazda fan
Squid Gaming well the road is not straight most of the time so civic lose most of the time
Forgot to mention reliability. A turbo engine won’t last as long as compared to a NA engine.
You may save 3k and a couple dollars on gas but once your turbo start giving problems, that’s where all your savings will go to. It eventually irons out.
Buy what you like.
I’ll take the Mazda 3 it looks a lot better and has a lot of potencial to be modified and tuned but so does the civic.
xxmobstrxx 853 mazda 3 potential to be modified? Lol bro come on the civic is the pinnacle
Of that shit, if ur into that ricer stuff, get a miata or brz if ur serious of modding a car and go to the track beliieve me i learned the hard way
Jesus H Medrano I just don’t like the fact that everyone and their moms have a civic. Yea the civics are being modified left and right but I feel like a Mazda speed 3 may come out for this gen.
i believe the 3000 usd difference is mainly on the AWD and bose.. if you test the closest variant FWD with regards to price, the mazda is unbeatable.. exterior, interior and driving dynamics. the 1.5L turbo has issues by the way.. Honda's turbo has issues, google it up.. reliability? you can't really say mazda is unreliable,(time will tell). the honda is perceived to be more reliable, it is more of a subjective thought nowadays that mazdas are pretty reliable as well as honda and toyota.. consumer reports(google this as well) mazda as top 3 next to toyota and lexus which is by the way under the same wing, basically mazda is top 2 right?.. forgive me for bringing this up, but i think this review is very flawed.. i'm sure i'm not the only one who disagrees with the verdict and how you came up with it. you should have put point and weight system on every category.. Exterior? civic is too futuristic and too aggressive, i'm kinda lost in the design of the civic. it is trying to be something it isn't with the fake vents.. interior? civic is just plain outdated.. who said practicality can't come with good design of interior? honda's interior is worse than toyota.. i know this is a budget segment, but budget doesn't mean cheap looking.. it doesn't have to be ugly or cheap looking if it is a budget segment.. toyota for god's sake makes the vios so cheap looking(exterior).. are they just that too lazy to come up with a better exterior design? simple because it is not a luxury or up market segment?.. honda has good looks but not so good interior.. transmission? CVT vs 6AT il leave it there.. if you give me a manual civic and a manual mazda 3 we may have an argument but if CVT vs 6AT there isn't really a case.. Power and driving dynamics? these two are made as daily drivers, not as race cars.. they both have sporty feeling and that is good enough.. i'm not a honda hater or a full pledged mazda lover, but i just think you are giving the civic too much credit for something that is not necessarily true.. it more practical because it is bigger but if you want a big sized car go for an suv.. not every person who is in the market of the civic and mazda 3 are 6 feet and above in height.. not everyone wants or needs to haul 5 persons every day.. at the end of the day, if budget wasn't a concern almost all of us would want a bugatti/lambo as cars and huracan as compact suvs, rolls royce for business matters, a wrangler for off roading, a RV bus for long recreational drives and etc.. what im trying to say is that not one car in that group is a complete package right? there is always a trade off.. what mazda has done in the compact car segment is very good.. a good looking car, an interior design that rivals base luxury cars, a good enough engine that runs well, a good enough space for most, a cargo that can't really fit a cow but still is enough for its intended purpose.. i believe the civic only have space and mileage as its clear advantage against the mazda and reliability is too subjective.. i think that advantage against the mazda is not that great that it evens out the score of mazda's advantage in exterior and interior.. can't compare price for AWD and FWD though.. your doing mazda an injustice!
Have owned 2018 SI a few months now. Love this car. Performance matters to much to me. Every Civic will out perform that Mazda. Now, counterpoint! That Mazda is gorgeous! Flat out a better looker than Civic! Inside and out. Especially inside. Still don't care though. Civic's are to much fun, at a cheaper price!
Keith Jackson just wait till next year when Mazda has a AWD 2.5T 3 ;)
@@kylenewberry8598 Brother? I hope you're right but I know Mazda can't afford do it. If they did? It wouldn't be the brawler the last Mazdaspeed 3 was. One can always hope? But the way Mazdas been doing things the last few years, I wouldn't bet on it.
Keith Jackson it's confirmed the engine fits, and that awd can have a Manual. Would only be a matter of tuning the ecu. Or they could take the 2.5 and tune it like thru did the 2.0 in miata. They would give maybe 215/220 hp but With that linear powerband. So it would be minor $ and effort for mazda to do so. Plus they've been adding that engine to the cx5 and 6 recently.
Cvt transmissions suck, the Mazda looks better, drives better, and has awd. If interior space is what you’re looking for then the compact segment isn’t for you. It really doesn’t matter in this segment except for reviewers who claim that a couple of inches make or break a car in a review 😂. Face it for the next few years the Mazda is the best compact until the richer bigger companies can update their cars completely twice before Mazda can once. An appliance vs a niche drivers car. I know which one i’m going to choose.
Mazda 3 win by a mile here, I've been a civic F boy ever since but this one is no contest! Need to commend mazda for a job well done.
I owned Toyotas and Mazdas and never had problems. I owned a Honda Civic and man that cvts is a break on the back with the cvt. It gave me engine problems and something with a gas pump leaking and some missing bolts on the bottom right side. Never buy Cvts stupid engine ideas.
All these comments and according to the numbers, Honda’s killing it vs Mazda. Every forum... all talk no action.
Havent driven a Civic but knowing the Mazda 3 and its top notch steering Im really curious how honda could do it any better.
Id love for Honda to expend Civic Si lineup and offer a hatchback. That would honestly be a perfect combination of practicality, driving dynamics and affordability. I like what Mazda is doing with the interior and awd option is great too, but after test driving Si I fell in love with the its crisp handling, balance and sporty interior, just can't get over sedan's styling and coupe is not a practical option for me.
We may see Mazda 3 speed but I have a feeling that car is gonna be in high 20's low 30's
Mazda 3 definitely better than civic
Torsion beam.
@@MrGunzngirlz this generation is a nicer ridding vehicle than the previous generation with the multi link suspension setup.
Yeah, how? The civic is literally better in every way
Civic with that CVT, instant fail!!
u can get a 6 speed manual
So drive stick for instant win then.
Haha. Got anything else to back up your Mazda? Oh wait, you can't lmaooo
Who the hell wants a manual if they want auto? CVT is trash!!
"Civic hatch is ugly" ya'll be dead to me now
It is ugly.
Of course it's Ugly. The sedan is the one to go for when it comes to Civics.
Yeah they say it cuz they hate hondas
There is barely any uglier hatchback... It looks like a familial car..
I did not cross shop the Mazda when I was recently shopping for a compact car because it was just coming out and not yet available, and too expensive. I did cross shop Civic and the new Corolla hatch. I ended up with the Corolla hatch for overall interior comfort, fuel economy, and price for what you get. I love my Corolla hatch. It should be noted if you get the Sport Touring coupe Civic (the one with 180HP) you are required to run premium fuel. Another reason I did not want that car.
Craig Chevalier it is not required it is recommended. You can run regular fuel if you want.
@@NaijaBull It's true, but it's not 180HP if you don't run premium. Probably 174 like the regular 1.5T Civics.
Cool! Congrats on your new Toyota! What's your favorite thing about it?
@@AutoGuide Honestly, the way it looks. I got an XSE fully loaded in blizzard pearl. It is a great looking car, both inside and out. Aside from the looks, I'd have to say my next favorite thing is the interior comfort. I love the seats, it's a great place to spend time.
I was in the same exact position, but went with the Civic. Liked the interior and drive better, but it was a tough call. I think the Mazda 3 if out at the time would have made the decision even thougher lol
If you want gasoline mixing with your engine oil, the Honda is the car for you. How is it that a Japanese company can make an engine so bad? It's too bad that Autoguide made the Honda the recommendation in this video because now a ton of people are going to go to the Honda dealership and get screwed over with a lemon after a few years.
Old news are exciting, I got the civic 3 months ago and it doesn't have that issue
all DI engines get a bit of fuel in the oil it is normal, the CRV had more problems with this, i hear its rare in the civic, i live in cold weather state have a 2 mile communte and had zero issues with dillution but honda still extended my warranty for a year
The Mazda 3 is the winner for sure in my own personal opinion
I’m so torn between these 2. Leaning towards the civic, although I haven’t driven it yet. However, I have driven the Mazda and it felt a bit closed in, if that makes sense?
Yeah the 3 is tight inside.
Both are handsome, but I'd take Sebasti.... I mean the Honda....
😘
That's right cos your a sheep and have no opinion of your own
Consumers, don't give Honda your hard earned $ until they fix the 1.5t's fuel dilution problem.
do you own one honda civic 1.5 with fuel dilution problem??...I have one and dont have that problem.
@@IrmanSarajlija Yes, we have a 1.5t lease in the family. Yes, fuel dilution. It's a short tripper in NYC climate.
@@eric9249 ok...here in europe people dont claim about it..i dont know why...
As an owner of a 2019 Type R, I will tell you most of these guys complaints are a joke. The civic looks very good and the angles give it some good aggression. I can easily sit behind my self and easily put my son's car seat behind with plenty of room for his feet to swing back and forth on. 16 buttons to change the radio station.....get out of here, this review is terrible. I can see why the Straight pipes are blowing up and have passed Autoguide.
Not sure ai like the new direction Mazda is going. They are going considerably more upmarket, they are leading in fuel economy and what happened to room in the backseat? And with the new turbo, compression ignition engines coming soon, I fear Mazda might lose their reputation for reliability.
The Civic feels like you're sitting inside a cardboard box. I was surprised how cheap it felt inside. Absurdly cheap.
Okay? That's all you got to back up the Mazda? The Honda beats the Mazda in every category except interior materials and awd lol. Dumbass.
Look out for the butthurt Honda fanboys responding to your comment. Lol.
@@DJPleasureSeekingMissle I pay little attention to people who can't abide an opinion other than their own.
Same. Before I saw it in person Civic was top on my list. But when I went to test drive, I was very disappointed. The Mazda hatch is a lot better looking in person and online! Its fun to drive and handle!
@@imtheonehero9305 whats that every category?
If cost a significant factor then compare both with FWD!!! And the opening attempt at Throttle House “fun” just didn’t work.
Mazda wins.
The Mazda grill is just sick. I relocated my plates just for that reason.
Thank you Mazda, for the NA engine and AT transmission.
You can change the radio via left side steering control . 1 click job done civic is much better
Civic is a better car. There’s a reason it’s the number one selling car in Canada.
I'd go Civic with a manual and save a ton of money while getting a better driver with more practicality. The new Mazda 3 just traded too much of its soul for luxury. Way expensive now as well.
We kind of had that feeling too. We expected the Mazda3 to really sparkle, and it kind of fell short. As always, thanks for watching, Blake!
Lol so after redesigning the Mazda 3, they managed to build a more expensive, less efficient, smaller car than the segment leader. No wonder Mazda sells the least cars in this category. I would love to see a comparison between the new n old Mazda 3
That’s because they refuse to use a piece of shit CVT to get fuel mileage. So if you like fuel economy and are fine with your transmission breaking down by all means buy a CVT.
Mazda stepping up the non enthusiast car game
Lol. 😆 Its still a nice car
Unfair to compare a 1.5li Turbo with a 2.5li NA. Civic is bound to win in fuel economy comparison with a much larger engine. Civic is good but Mazda is better and worth it.
I loved both
As a previous owner of a 2012 Mazda 3, and current owner of a 2019 Honda Civic, I respect both cars for their handling.
The way Sebastian trash talked Mazda’s driving dynamics speaks to his lack of knowledge on the engineering that went into it for the new model. It’s superior to Honda’s. They haven’t revised the civic since 2015 so it’s behind in the segment. Mazda’s driving and handling are top of the class. Honda’s car is good looking but a lack of volume knob, busy interior, and outdated look just proved the Mazda is the better choice overall.
Has Honda fixed the oil dilution problem with their Civic and CRV engines for the 2019/2020 model?
"Don't forget to hit ring the bell" lol
I think the Mazda 3 could use a smaller 1.5 or 1.6L turbo to get better mileage as the Civic. AWD is a good extra to have, you don't need it all the time, but is good enough to have it
Hey that's a good idea! Thanks for watching!
Need to remember the Mazda tested was awd so of course the F.E. is going to be better in the Civic.
@@mpg65 AWD is something you don't need all the time, but it's good to know is there
Is it just me or do Automotive journalists seem really irritating and somewhat whiny in my opinion. To be honest I prefer the Kia Forte you get just as good gas mileage the engines just Pepe enough to get you going it feels comfortable rides well handles well and does everything these other cars do for less money. In fact if you get the Forte LX Fe with the automatic you're getting 31 City 41 Highway that's a sold in my book.
The Kia Forte is an EXCELLENT pick! We have a Civic vs Forte comparison coming soon! Thanks for watching!
The Civic needs premium for those fuel economy numbers, and you used the Mazdas AWD fuel economy figures which is horseshit. Do a real world test of FWD vs FWD on 87 for both.
I think Civic is more unique looking, cars now have that same grill styling, thats why bought a Civic, never drive a Mazda before, but I bet the experience is better than a Honda
What do you do when you can’t compete? You offer all wheel drive. Which is nice if you’re in snow but also cost of maintenance and unreliability goes up. Not to mention fuel economy gets worse. It’s hard to beat a Honda.
The dude loses all credibility when he calls the Mazda infotainment system tiny. That thing has an 8-inch display and the knob control in the center is not only way more stylish but is way more practical and safe to use while driving. Touch screen operation is table for driving.
Mike Dye He thinks it’s tiny because he plugged in an Android phone which doesn’t have support for the wide screen yet.
Get the cheaper option of both, where you will still get most of the high quality materials and by far beat the Honda in price/value. Most buyers after a 20k car wont pay for the extra of the bose system and the other expensive add on you have in the ones you tested. Test the car your audience will buy.
Honda looks outstanding... and is better car..
At night in the in Black on black...when you do not see it.
Is this a fair review? AWD compared to non-AWD????
test drove both and i picked the honda, i think its better inside and out i just dont like the mouse BS in the mazda