In todays video we test how fast this 2020 Chevrolet Silverado 5.3 compared to my 2021 Ford F150 5.0! DRAGY - amzn.to/3HitmWN PHONE MOUNT - amzn.to/3FdmnM6
I'm dying to know how quick my truck is. I have a 21' Powerboost crew cab 4x4 5.5' bed 3.73 rear w/6" lift on 35" mt's and I average 14 mpg, neighbors with same truck bone stock get 24-25 mpg. Anyone know of the best bang for buck 0-60 computer??
Man those are both not bad looking rigs considering I'm generally not a fan of the newer designs. But the blue on that Ford and the sleek body style is quite attractive.
True, however the bigger tires brings the two ratios closer together. Ford does offer a 3.31 and 3.55 as well but this one must have the towing package. Either way if you're comparing how they come from the factory this is a good test, probably near impossible to get everything totally on equal ground. You can also argue the GM gets to it's peak HP and torque quicker because it's pushrod and Ford shifts around 6k rpm which is even before it hit's it's peak.
Pushrod? Tell that to 9k rpm NASCAR engine builders. It’s the aggressive cam timing and breathing capability of larger intake and exhaust volume in the Ford.
@@cjpayne677 ford is smarter by having the gearing options they do. I thought the old z71/s have 3.73 as well but i guess the new ones are only 3.23 which is a terrible idea by gm.
@Chris Whitlow these new chevs would really benefit from 4.10's, gm hands down has the absolute worst differential gear ratio options 3.23 gears only is absolutely horrendous no matter how many gears you have you have especially if you go big tires
The new 5.3 with the ten speed is a beast compared to what they used to be! However,….. stock for stock, tune for tune, bolt-ons vs bolt-ons, built vs built, the Coyote will always stomp all over the 5.3 liter. The 5.3 needs a cam and all the works to run with a sealed block Coyote. The 6.2 is a way better matchup for the 5L.
Good job on this video. Props for changing wheels and tires. New GM, I would have to go with 6.2 liter. Not a Ford guy but those 5.0s are great. V8 or bust. Reliability, power, and the sound.
@@BC08 exactly lol while still being an old school push rod engine compared to coyotes with quadruple the cams and being also able to electronically adjust each one of those cams independently.
5.0 sounds the best, runs the best, frankly is blatantly superior to the 5.3 and it’s not close. Ford even has the 5.0 neutered with the stock tune, shifting 500+ rpm before the engine’s actual 6500 true HP peak
@@donnielovedahl1580 The Mustang is over half a ton lighter, has less drive line loss due to being shorter, and has much better aerodynamics. Sub 6 second 0-60 in a truck is hauling ass for a truck. That F150 is somewhere around 2 1/2 tons.
Nice and easy review with good details! Thanks for this! On another note, can we appreciate how fast these trucks are hauling such a big ass down the road!?
Same here brother, I have a 2011 Ford F150 with a 5.0L Coyote V8 in it with 149,000 miles on it and still going strong and its a beast and it sounds like a beast with the Borla ATAK exhaust on it.
I actually traded in my 5.3 chevy, great looking truck, never been a huge ford fan but when I hit 200k the chevy only being 5 years I knew I needed something with warranty for how much driving I do. I tried a couple new chevys and then drove the ford and I was stunned. Both the 3.5l twin turbo ecoboost and the 5.0 just blew the chevy out of the water. I had my chevy nearly fbo besides headers but even went as far as changing the throttle body and intake and tuned it as well as e85. The stock 5.0 I drove still embarrassed it. Needless to say, I drove away with the ford that day. Chose the 5.0 because they felt similar on the highway although the eco did seem a little faster from a stop. I didn't like the idea of the extra troubles past 100k.
6.8 out a 5.3? That's nuts. The 10 speed is crazy. The best you used to be able to get was low 8's. With the 6.2 running about 6.8. Just goes to show what shorter gears with better shifts does.
GM is notorious for putting highway gears in trucks. They are more concerned with fleet CAFE standards than anything else. They always leave a lot on the table concerning performance. Ford doesn’t seem to be near as lax as GM concerning performance out of the box.
Man, not saying you're wrong, by comparison the 5.3L is fairly underpowered to any other modern V8, be it 5.0L Ford, 5.7L Hemi or 6.2L GM, but what a world we live in where 355hp and 383ftlbs of torque is considered "underpowered". I grew up in the 1990s and remember when the Ford 5.8L Windsor made 210hp and 330ftlbs of torque and the GM 5.7L made 200hp and 315ftlbs of torque. We are honestly living in the glory days of the internal combustion engine when we can say 350hp+ isn't enough lol.
They both are nice trucks, I like the 5.0 myself but in this instance I’ll take the one with the cheaper payment or better yet paid for 🙌🏻. Thanks for the video!!
The Chevy's highway 3.23 ratio is a severe deterrent over the Ford's way more performance ratio of 3.73. that could be at least a .5 sec difference in the 0-60, maybe more.
The 5.0 wipes the floor with all available v8's .. Its got more hp.. better gearing in the rear and trans, and the biggest factor is the hundreds of pounds less weight the Ford has due to the aluminium body..
I'm not gonna lie. For stock for stock these are impressive 0-60 numbers. Also your video is amazing and is a true comparison video vs alot of these vids people try and compare a semi built to built truck to stock n say they're favored options
I have a 2022 with a 5.0 and and had 2019 before that. Hands down a bad ass engine. I test drove a 3.5 Ecoboost, it just sounded so awful. Could not get past it.
I was quite happy when my 2018 ram with 12.5"x35" tires bullied my little bro's brand new stock trail boss 😄 but then he bought an old 06 impala SS and that little thing blew my rams doors off lol
I've been wanting to say this for awhile reading all the comments here. My 06 Impala SS has the 5.3 with 303 HP and 323 foot lbs of torque and it runs a 9.28 1/8 mile run with 198k miles on it. Very fun for the family car.
@@lovethehuntOutdoors My brothers was an EMS chiefs car for 10 years now he drives it back and forth to work , still has the lights and everything , we have alot of fun with it !
Great video. I've been waiting for months for someone to do a straight up base level V8 comparison between Chevy & Ford. I live in Central Iowa and I bet 95% of the 1/2 tons driving around Des Moines have the 5.3L or 3.5L EcoBoost. I've always been Chevy guy but I think my next pickup will be a Ford. I'm also a traditionalist and know that a naturally aspirated V8 can stir emotions that a turbocharged v6 can only dream of so my Ford would definitely be the 5.0L V8. A big reason is the rear end choices Chevrolet gives you are so lame. I think the highest ratio you can do is a 3.42 but again, 99% of them driving down the road are the 3.23 and I know they do this for fuel efficiency but if I wanted a 3.73 or a 4.10 rear end why can't I order it? Ford's overall package on their V8 just seems like a better value.
The 5.3 is a turd when it comes to brute horsepower, but the bottom end is stout as hell, and being a pushrod V8 it is such a simple design with lots of room left in the engine bay for maintenance. My last 5.3 had 250k miles before the truck was totaled, my current 5.3 truck is at 220k. The 5.3 is also legendary in terms of holding an ungodly amount of boost.
There used to be a bit of a weight difference between these two which was probably the biggest factor outside the power numbers and gearing. My 16 Silverado was about 5,500 lbs on the dump scales and my 19 F150 is 4,900 lbs. Same layout and both middle of the road trims. Is Chevy doing aluminum bodies now? That being said I didn't have great luck with my Chevy and now have the Ford and haven't looked back
Not sure why people have such a difficult time just admitting the Ford engine runs better. The 5.0 just runs better, its a stronger engine. All this BS about power band and yeah, okay the rear makes a bit of difference but not enough. GM needs 6.2L to keep up.
5.0’s got some ass to them. My 18’ RCSB let me feel almost every bit of the 395 hp and 410 lb-ft torque, but my heart belongs to GM. In all actuality though, for the Silverado having almost 45ish hp and 30-40ish lb-ft torque less than the F150 it didn’t do too badly. I’d imagine the 6.2 would shine greatly in one of these matchups.
Definitely think the Chevy is hurt by not having better gears. 3.23 vs 3.73. Ik for sure my old Tahoe had 3.73s and it would walk any tahoe that had the 3.42 or 3.08. Something with that 3.73 and first and second gear, it was just better with the tire size and what not.
GMs torque management programming is ridiculous. It’s very aggressive. I’m not sure what has happened to GM for the last 15 years. They have gone soft with their trucks. I’ve heard aftermarket tuning makes a big difference for the 5.3 and 6.2. Not so much with horsepower gains as just getting rid of all the torque management nannies. Moving the shift points up. Guess they are worried about their drivelines not holding up. You can hear how soft the 5.3s launch is. Even with the traction control off. GM really needs to step up their truck game anyways.
Both of these trucks are real nice. I really don't care which one if faster. Both will go fast enough to get you pulled over. I enjoy driving my 2019 Chevy 5.3. Plenty of motor for me. It is smooth, powerful, and gets amazing fuel economy for a full size truck. I have owned Fords, Dodges, and Chevys. They all have their good points and bad. So drive what you like and don't be all that concerned over which one is fastest.
All those do is change the throttle map so in a race where you’re mashing the pedal to the floor it would make no difference at all in around town driving you feel a difference because the pedal may be only a quarter depressed but the throttle on the engine opens half for example
Did a 60roll with a trail boss 5.3 in my 5.0 and walked him everytime. At one point I was downshifting and he took off and got a hit on me and still I caught up walked him before I we got to 105mph cut off had 2 2.7 now got a 21 5.0 and love it. Yes I loved the turbos but having a v8 rumble is just something different.
It's really amazing that the 5.0 is punching so far above its weight. The 5.3 isn't even competition and it takes an engine 1.2L bigger from GM to be comparable. Not only that but the LT design is a lot newer too.
If you want a real test put both motors with the same horse power same torque and same gear axle ratio see which one will do better then you have a real test
@@miketibbs2619 Then that just removes the motive for these videos LOL. They are showing you what is offered as off the lot. Your comment makes aboslutely no sense.
@@87Bertha hey this guy thinks the 5.0 is punching so far above it's weight class but it takes more horse and torque to do it that's why I said make everything the same and you will see it isn't punching above it's weight class is what I was getting at he should have used a Chevy with the 3.43 rear end and it might have pulled better acceleration times seeing as the ford had the 3.73 gears which is going to give it a big advantage against a truck with 3.23 gears it's just think how much better the mustangs do when you take out the 3.26 rear end and put a 4.10 rear end in it
@@miketibbs2619 so your opinion on this video is they should've not compared vehicles from straight off the lot but un-modify a truck to be equal to the other?
@@87Bertha what I am getting at is the ford has a 3.73 gear ratio in the rear end which means it will accelerate quicker then the Chevy which has 3.23 rear end the ford has the biggest rear end ratio you can get from the factory so why not use the Chevys highest gear ratio from the factory it's still lower but it is also closer to the fords which would make the run more comparable or get a ford with the 3.55 gear ratio at the end of the day the ford should still win just based on the gear ratio of the rear end when it comes to acceleration tests
Throw some 3.73 gears in the Chevrolet and I believe it would change it up a bit, along with another 45 hp and 25 ft pounds. I have had both, at the end of the day I keep my trucks till high mileage for work usually hitting the 250k-300k mark. Both solid trucks but ford end up costing some money with cam phasers being ohc
Most of the current gen 5.3 and 6.2l GM motors don't even make it till the 1st oil change not needing head removal to change lifters and probably cam shaft. These motors wont make it past warranty and they will be in the scrap yard. If the VIN on your truck starts with a 3, made in Mexico and is junk
The engines have totally different power bands. The ford needs the lower gear to get higher in the rev range. The 5.3 makes more power down low, the higher gears benifit its engine.
They really don't. With 10 speed transmissions it's almost negligible. Look at the video of two mustangs racing. Only difference was rear end. They went back and forth on who won.
@@RealSteelStreet and 10 speed trans vs what for the GM was it the 6/8/10 speed? They were all available that year... Doesn't sound like a 10 speed to me.
Scared of what? It’s a 6,000 lb truck. It’s not that fast, you need to get into a fast car, then go back in your truck and you won’t be scared any more.
@@ShelbyvsViper Any 60s muscle car doing 5.5 sec to 60mph back in the day, sure would have been considered borderline scary back then though, I'm sure !!
Better yet, Imagine taking a 5.0 V8 single cab, Back to the Future, at Indy '72. Then run like a 13.5 @ 100+mph and tell them it's BOX STOCK ! What do you think would be going through those guys' minds ..... Alien Tech, perhaps?!
Don’t forget some of the Chevy models from 14-21 have the AFM/DFM which causes lifter failure and subsequently caused a class action lawsuit against Chevy over it.
Raised on Ford Triton V8 and original 5.0. I’ve owned a 6.2 Yukon xl denali and it made about 6 second 0-60 which I thought was fast. Moved into offroaders with two 4Runners and a 3rd Gen Tacoma that were pigs 0-60 and on gas but drove great. Now I’m running a TRX with a recorded and repeated 3.9 0-60. I think the new Raptor R will give the TRX a run for the money if it has the pumped up 5.0. Unfortunately, the Raptor R will start msrp above 100k and likely be AMR’d into entry supercar prices.
If I wanted a fast truck I would go 5.0 2 door with 3.73’s. Not sure if you need to get a king bed for that or not but I like the 2 door short beds for half tons, lots of fun.
@@alexmills1329 a deleted diesel sounds better than anything, DEEP tone that slams up against your seat off the line. I have a 2019 5.0 Mustang GT, obviously it will run off and leave all those gas trucks stock. I have a friend with a powerstoke that’s been deleted and tune, my mustang won’t touch it. From a dig he jumps out 4-5 links out of the gate and I can’t ever catch him until about 100 mph then I can pass him. No one races top end.
@@Imprisoned1995 I know guys with tuned diesels and I personally wouldn’t own one after seeing how many issues have popped up over the years with them, mostly duramax is my experience there
Yes it is. Goes to show. Smaller ford engine in heavier truck than Chevy still is faster , better stronger. Don't forget,.more reliable as well . Once again FORD makes the best truck. Ford has made the best Trucks since the 1970s. Truth hurts. Poor Chevy lovers. It's ok to love weak slow and unreliable trucks. Someone's gotta buy Chevy
It’s gears 3:23 gears are always going to be slower that 3:73 to speed. 3:23 gears are for fuel economy. You need a 3:42 or 3:73 in a gm to actually compare. The 5.0 liter is a highly tuned engine and the two actually don’t compete. the 5.3 being a actual truck engine and the 5.0 being a modified car engine.
The 5.3 is a fuel miser with capabilty. The gearing isnt really fair though but the 5.3 wont generally come with aggressive gearing for that reason. The upside, much better gas mileage than the 5.0. About 2- 4 mpg on average. That adds up at $5 a gallon.
I was so confused because you had both tests labeled as f150. I’ve never owned either of these trucks but my friend had a 5.3 and what i hated about it was how long it would take to shift down if you wanted to pass on the highway, took forever! And also the interior looked 10yrs behind
I have to say GM is trying their hardest to keep up with that 5.0. But it takes a 6.2 to even come close to out running it. No matter how hard they try they still can't keep up and this was one of their commercials!!!!
The 6.2 silverado is more gear for the 5.0 f150 The 6.2 420hp to the 5.0 and ecoboost 400hp. The updated 5.3 only has 355hp but better fuel economy and little more hp than the previous 5.3s.. so the chevrolet did not do that bad 😉
@@ProjectFairmont the 6.2 torque I would think comes on faster and probably lower in the rpm because of turbo lag but the ecoboost as long as you not in boost will be better fuel economy wise.
I looked up the specs and the torque curves for the 6.2L and for the ecoboost. The chevy 6.2 was rated at 420hp and 460lbft tq and the torque comes in at 4100rpms. The ecoboost was rated at 400hp and 500ftlbs at 3100rpms. So in actuality the ecoboost reaches peak torque a 1,000rs lower.
If you compare apples to apples the 3.5 ho would be more comparable to the 6.2. The 3.5ho comes in the powerboost, king ranch, limited, and platinum variants of the f150. It has 450hp and 510 ft/tq.
It won’t be a fair comparison the ford has a smaller engine why don’t he put fords 6.2 against Chevys 6.2 now that is a good comparison the ford will win because the 6.2 from ford has more power and the raptor is lighter then the Silverado ford all day baby
@@musicbass4469 lol no, you are talking straight out of your ass lol Chevy 6.2 makes more power then the ford 6.2 used in the older raptor and in the new f250’s too
@@eric6.2ltccsb You are correct on both accounts. Ford made the 6.2L for the Raptor truck (1st Gen) and it did well for what they needed it to do. But it had its flaws as even the 5.3 Chevy would walk it out of the box. If it were a 6.2 v 6.2 mashup between Ford v Chevy, then the Chevy would leave that dumpster fire choking on its own smoke at the start and stripe.
The modular engine design was released in 1991, making it the oldest current engine family in production. While there was compromises in terms of bore spacing to accommodate FWD applications, it’s modern OHC design has allowed it to remain relevant. With notable exceptions like the cam phasing failure prone 5.4 3v, the now current 3rd Gen Coyote is remarkably efficient and robust. I have an 11 sec Whipple 3.0 F150 5.0 daily driver tow vehicle, for a stock long block it’s something I wouldn’t have believed possible 20 years ago.
It being "modular" has absolutely zero, zilch with it being an "engine family". It is just Ford's general term for OHC V8 engines and assembly process. The new 5.0 shares absolutely nothing with the older 4.6/5.4 other than being OHC. it is no different than trying to associate a Gen II/I (LT/L98) GM smallbock to an LS/LT engine. They are clean sheet engine designs. It is not the "oldest" engine family in production. Tbh, the 1997 LS1 shares far more architecture with the newer LT1/2 than any Ford SOHC/DOHC 4.6/5.4 and today's Coyote. But, nonetheless, the 5.0, all Gens, are strong as F. They're fun to drive, for sure.
@@bricebarefoot3437 First of all it is absolutely known as the modular engine family. It’s a name used since it’s introduction and continues to be associated with this family of engines, although no longer directly as there is now only one remaining, not a variety of displacements, 2v, 3v and 4v. Although it may not share any common parts with the OG 4.6, it is certainly a derivative. From the block design, cam timing components and hydraulic finger followers. Even the oil pump was the same until only recently. What engine family is older? I stand by everything I stated. There was no hyperbole implied, and have I known these engines since the beginning.
@@ProjectFairmont It is a 100% clean sheet design. It shares nothing, no more than the fact that it is an OHC engine. Maybe some block dimensions...but that's about it. Not even the firing order. As far as "derivative"....I can say that for nearly every single engine on the market today. Like I said, a Gen III LS shares more with an Gen V LT engine than a 2v 4.6/5.4 does with a Coyote. And that is a fact. "Modular" engine was an adopted term. The manufacturing process was termed "modular"....an investment in tooling that was applicable to all engines produced by Ford. You're just flat-out being biased if you think it is the "oldest" engine family. I mean, a Gen II L98 from 1985 shares as much with a Gen V LT1/2 as the Modular family, from inception. Stand by what you said....it's a far stretch of the truth. And being the "oldest" simply isn't true. I say this and I'm a fan of the Ford's OHC engines.
@@bricebarefoot3437 dude, sorry your wrong. Believe what you want, I know for a fact it is based on the 4.6. Firing order? The current F150 Coyote firing order is different than the Mustang Gen3 Coyote. The 4.6 and 5.0 have the same rod and main bearing sizes. You can run a Coyote crank in a 4.6 block, and the heads will physically bolt on. Nothing swaps from an LS to an L98. Sorry, it’s is the oldest engine family. No bias, FACT.
To make it clear the original coyote was based of the dohc 4.6 not the sohc, but it was definitely based off the dohc 4.6 released in 1993 for the Lincoln Mark VIII
Awesome brother, that Tundra sure is one dependable beast (especially with the 5.7L I-Force V8) and it'll definitely outlast any EcoBoost engine with ease my brother.
I've driven my 2019 6.2 GMC Sierra Denali against another buddy of mine with a 5.0 2022 F150 and I leave him at the start every time. We both have exhaust done and that's about it. I'm looking forward to his next comparison to see if it isn't just me.
@@Imprisoned1995 Oh trust me, I know they haul and much more than just a trailer too. Problem is they aren't as fuel efficient for what I need nor as practical for driving a family around town. If I had a 5th wheel, I'd probably get a nice 2500 turbo diesel and clap it out a touch just for fun. But till that day comes, I'll keep having fun with my 6.2L. 😎
Agree. Results would be totally radical if the 5.3 had tight axle and comparable hp. Honestly if the 5.3 had 3.73 gears and 395 hp it would kill fords number
I have a friend that is a Chevy salesman. He told me that he wouldn’t buy a 5.3. The lifter issue is the main reason.
I appreciate the work you put in swapping those wheels out for the test 👍🏻
🔥
facts
I'm dying to know how quick my truck is. I have a 21' Powerboost crew cab 4x4 5.5' bed 3.73 rear w/6" lift on 35" mt's and I average 14 mpg, neighbors with same truck bone stock get 24-25 mpg. Anyone know of the best bang for buck 0-60 computer??
4:18 But he couldn't remove the child seat. That modification requires a 4ft beard to return back to stock.
Crazy how good a 5.0 engine sounds in those Fords. As a Ford guy I still like the Chevy a lot too.
🔥
both good.
It’s always the small channels that create the best content
Much love ❤
Man those are both not bad looking rigs considering I'm generally not a fan of the newer designs. But the blue on that Ford and the sleek body style is quite attractive.
I want to see chomper vs Larry please
Not much to compare lol
@@hazythef-1506 true but I mainly want to see the 0-60 from both of them
😂no comparison
I want Larry content in general 😂.
PLEASE
I love the 5.0 V8. I hate the cylinder deactivation on the GMs.
Since 2021, the cylinder deactivation has been applied to the 5.0L V8 and GM has discontinued that option on their 5.3L V8 due to chip shortage.
Same, traditionally a Chevy guy but it’s holding me back from a getting a newer Silverado. Might have to switch to team ford
@@gascan_productions 2019+ GM trucks are not comfortable to drive for me as well
😂
You can’t beat that coyote
Those gears in the 5.0L will make a big difference.
True, however the bigger tires brings the two ratios closer together. Ford does offer a 3.31 and 3.55 as well but this one must have the towing package. Either way if you're comparing how they come from the factory this is a good test, probably near impossible to get everything totally on equal ground. You can also argue the GM gets to it's peak HP and torque quicker because it's pushrod and Ford shifts around 6k rpm which is even before it hit's it's peak.
Pushrod? Tell that to 9k rpm NASCAR engine builders. It’s the aggressive cam timing and breathing capability of larger intake and exhaust volume in the Ford.
@@cjpayne677 ford is smarter by having the gearing options they do. I thought the old z71/s have 3.73 as well but i guess the new ones are only 3.23 which is a terrible idea by gm.
@Chris Whitlow these new chevs would really benefit from 4.10's, gm hands down has the absolute worst differential gear ratio options 3.23 gears only is absolutely horrendous no matter how many gears you have you have especially if you go big tires
Yeah that that’s why chevy has been in decline for years, they make their trucks cars basically now days
The new 5.3 with the ten speed is a beast compared to what they used to be! However,….. stock for stock, tune for tune, bolt-ons vs bolt-ons, built vs built, the Coyote will always stomp all over the 5.3 liter. The 5.3 needs a cam and all the works to run with a sealed block Coyote. The 6.2 is a way better matchup for the 5L.
That’s because Ford made that ten speed the Ford 10R80 and GM 10L80 are the same transmission
Good job on this video. Props for changing wheels and tires. New GM, I would have to go with 6.2 liter. Not a Ford guy but those 5.0s are great. V8 or bust. Reliability, power, and the sound.
I have a stock 2021 4x4 ranger 4 door that ran 8.90 1/8th mile with a tune. It still has stock exhast. Nice video
Just needed to know my 5.0 is faster than my buddies 5.3. Time for the real test tomorrow!!
3.73's are my all round, favorite gear set! I wonder what the 5.3 would do with that!
Eat it's own engine faster.
That's definitely more significant than most people realize. Gearing makes a really big difference.
I had a 99 gmc z71 with 5.3 and 3.73 gears. It would go pretty good
Ford had bigger tires and heavier wheels bringing the ratios closer but Ford probably still had slight advantage.
@@SOHCGT96 no it isn't...
Anything over EV trucks… 🤮
Sad that here in Chinada we don’t even get to put a good sounding exhaust on our V8s
I do want to see a 6.2 and the 5.0 with the way you compared this trucks tho.
Gotta give the 5.3 credit. Still does well being an old skol push rod design in such a heavy truck. Love that 5.0 too.
Not much heavier. The doors and a few other body parts are aluminum as well now...
Bow tie for life. ❤️
The Chevy is within 30 pounds of the Ford. Lmfao
@@BC08 exactly lol while still being an old school push rod engine compared to coyotes with quadruple the cams and being also able to electronically adjust each one of those cams independently.
@@fernandop937 TiVCT is nice for sure, but that huge flow right off the seat from those super sweet 4V heads is nice too.
The 5.0 sounds by far the best
I think the 5.3 sounds better
Stock ya….5.0 sounds ret@rded fully opened up
5.0 sounds the best, runs the best, frankly is blatantly superior to the 5.3 and it’s not close.
Ford even has the 5.0 neutered with the stock tune, shifting 500+ rpm before the engine’s actual 6500 true HP peak
@@campbell0162 So you think a softer, lazier, much weaker sounding engine sounds better?
😂
@@BC08 yeah no one said it wasn’t superior but it sounds like 🍑 I have one w headers and a muffler delete hate the way it sounds
at the end of the day both us ford guys and gm guys have only one thing in common ... THE V8. long live the V8
Amen Brother and not to mention that it'll outlast any EcoBoost engine anyday.
Dope video! Insane how much more hp the the stock 5.0 has then previous years
True
Wow..... didn't know stock trucks are that fast these days!!! I remember my 90 5.0 LX Stang was considered fast with a 6.2 0-60 back in the day!
Under 6 seconds to 60mph? Wow that is fast. Go Ford👍
Apparently you haven’t drove a 5.0 mustang that’s not fast lol 😂
@@donnielovedahl1580 I can imagine. The mustang is probably 1,200 lbs lighter.
@@donnielovedahl1580 it’s an effin truck my dude 🤦🏽 of course a mustang is faster
@@donnielovedahl1580 The Mustang is over half a ton lighter, has less drive line loss due to being shorter, and has much better aerodynamics. Sub 6 second 0-60 in a truck is hauling ass for a truck. That F150 is somewhere around 2 1/2 tons.
@@donnielovedahl1580 Apparently you have flew a fighter jet. Mustangs aren't fast!
Nice and easy review with good details! Thanks for this! On another note, can we appreciate how fast these trucks are hauling such a big ass down the road!?
The f150 is actually lighter than anything else..
@@PureCountryof91 7000lbs?
Good test.. Ford for life!!👍👍
I got a 2016 f150 5.0. Exhaust, intake and an e85 tune and my zero to 60s are 5 seconds flat
I like F150 with a 5.0 Coyote V8.
💪
Same here brother, I have a 2011 Ford F150 with a 5.0L Coyote V8 in it with 149,000 miles on it and still going strong and its a beast and it sounds like a beast with the Borla ATAK exhaust on it.
I actually traded in my 5.3 chevy, great looking truck, never been a huge ford fan but when I hit 200k the chevy only being 5 years I knew I needed something with warranty for how much driving I do. I tried a couple new chevys and then drove the ford and I was stunned. Both the 3.5l twin turbo ecoboost and the 5.0 just blew the chevy out of the water. I had my chevy nearly fbo besides headers but even went as far as changing the throttle body and intake and tuned it as well as e85. The stock 5.0 I drove still embarrassed it. Needless to say, I drove away with the ford that day. Chose the 5.0 because they felt similar on the highway although the eco did seem a little faster from a stop. I didn't like the idea of the extra troubles past 100k.
6.8 out a 5.3? That's nuts. The 10 speed is crazy. The best you used to be able to get was low 8's. With the 6.2 running about 6.8. Just goes to show what shorter gears with better shifts does.
6.2 is still better especially top end
What is even crazier is he filmed himself accelerating full-bore up to 80+ mph in a 45mph zone.
It doesn't matter if you win by an inch or a mile , winning is winning -
Dominick Toretto.
5.0 Forever ❤️
GM is notorious for putting highway gears in trucks. They are more concerned with fleet CAFE standards than anything else. They always leave a lot on the table concerning performance.
Ford doesn’t seem to be near as lax as GM concerning performance out of the box.
The 5.3 is so under powered. so is the 6.2. The bigger the engine the more capable of power. GM just put small cams and junk tunes in these engines.
Man, not saying you're wrong, by comparison the 5.3L is fairly underpowered to any other modern V8, be it 5.0L Ford, 5.7L Hemi or 6.2L GM, but what a world we live in where 355hp and 383ftlbs of torque is considered "underpowered". I grew up in the 1990s and remember when the Ford 5.8L Windsor made 210hp and 330ftlbs of torque and the GM 5.7L made 200hp and 315ftlbs of torque. We are honestly living in the glory days of the internal combustion engine when we can say 350hp+ isn't enough lol.
They both are nice trucks, I like the 5.0 myself but in this instance I’ll take the one with the cheaper payment or better yet paid for 🙌🏻. Thanks for the video!!
Im with you lol
The Chevy's highway 3.23 ratio is a severe deterrent over the Ford's way more performance ratio of 3.73. that could be at least a .5 sec difference in the 0-60, maybe more.
If only that held ANY truth, 😂😂😂
Coyote you sound so biased. Anyone that knows mechanics knows that 373s are a way better gear for get up and go.
I was going to say 6.8 0-60 is old school stock 5.0 Fox body Mustang Gt territory..That's impressive 👌 👏
Go Ford by the way 😊
I’m a Ford guy actually work at the F-150 plant but I can’t lie that Chevy small block with the cat back exhaust sounds like a beast
Great video! Love my 5.0. Just curious, we’re you running premium fuel in both trucks?
🔥🔥
The 5.0 wipes the floor with all available v8's .. Its got more hp.. better gearing in the rear and trans, and the biggest factor is the hundreds of pounds less weight the Ford has due to the aluminium body..
I'm not gonna lie. For stock for stock these are impressive 0-60 numbers. Also your video is amazing and is a true comparison video vs alot of these vids people try and compare a semi built to built truck to stock n say they're favored options
I have a 2022 with a 5.0 and and had 2019 before that. Hands down a bad ass engine. I test drove a 3.5 Ecoboost, it just sounded so awful. Could not get past it.
Hopefully the 6.8L will be optional in the F150 in the next couple years 🙏🏼
I'm sure it'll outlast any EcoBoost engine with ease as well.
I was quite happy when my 2018 ram with 12.5"x35" tires bullied my little bro's brand new stock trail boss 😄 but then he bought an old 06 impala SS and that little thing blew my rams doors off lol
I've been wanting to say this for awhile reading all the comments here. My 06 Impala SS has the 5.3 with 303 HP and 323 foot lbs of torque and it runs a 9.28 1/8 mile run with 198k miles on it. Very fun for the family car.
@@lovethehuntOutdoors My brothers was an EMS chiefs car for 10 years now he drives it back and forth to work , still has the lights and everything , we have alot of fun with it !
Great video. I've been waiting for months for someone to do a straight up base level V8 comparison between Chevy & Ford. I live in Central Iowa and I bet 95% of the 1/2 tons driving around Des Moines have the 5.3L or 3.5L EcoBoost. I've always been Chevy guy but I think my next pickup will be a Ford. I'm also a traditionalist and know that a naturally aspirated V8 can stir emotions that a turbocharged v6 can only dream of so my Ford would definitely be the 5.0L V8. A big reason is the rear end choices Chevrolet gives you are so lame. I think the highest ratio you can do is a 3.42 but again, 99% of them driving down the road are the 3.23 and I know they do this for fuel efficiency but if I wanted a 3.73 or a 4.10 rear end why can't I order it? Ford's overall package on their V8 just seems like a better value.
You are right sir, you are best off going with the Ford but those 3.5s are killer and just make the 5.3 and 6.2 look bad!
With $6 bucks gas next year you’ll be driving moped.
2012 F-150 5.0 here, no complaints. 315,000 on the odometer… new truck that was ordered in may should be here later this week :)
Love my little 22 5.0 rcsb !! Fast little truck for stock. The 5.0 is perfect for the 10 speed
The 5.3 is a turd when it comes to brute horsepower, but the bottom end is stout as hell, and being a pushrod V8 it is such a simple design with lots of room left in the engine bay for maintenance. My last 5.3 had 250k miles before the truck was totaled, my current 5.3 truck is at 220k. The 5.3 is also legendary in terms of holding an ungodly amount of boost.
There used to be a bit of a weight difference between these two which was probably the biggest factor outside the power numbers and gearing. My 16 Silverado was about 5,500 lbs on the dump scales and my 19 F150 is 4,900 lbs. Same layout and both middle of the road trims. Is Chevy doing aluminum bodies now? That being said I didn't have great luck with my Chevy and now have the Ford and haven't looked back
I would like to see these trucks with the same gearing! 3.23 vs 3.73 is a big difference. How can we compare when one has a big advantage?
The gears make alot of difference
😂😂😂 it is NOT that big difference you think it is....
That's right, gears make a huge difference when it comes to acceleration. That's the reason drag racers use low gears.
If you don't think it's that big of a difference then you don't know shit.
I think my old 12th gen 5.0 with more weight could get that brand new 5.3
Would love to see a ram 1500 in there with the 5.7 to see how they stack up and your reaction
I feel like the ram will beat the Chevy but more of a close race with the ford
Barely beat the 5.3 and the 5.0 smokes it lol
Everyone knows the 5.7s are ass
@@krayzie281 they are all good now only one that’s ass is your attitude 🤣
@@krayzie281 badass! Knucklehead comment Jorge.
3:23 vs 3:73 is huge advantage to Ford. GM has been missing the boat for decades despite all the potential.
So is 400hp vs 355hp !!
Not sure why people have such a difficult time just admitting the Ford engine runs better. The 5.0 just runs better, its a stronger engine. All this BS about power band and yeah, okay the rear makes a bit of difference but not enough. GM needs 6.2L to keep up.
@@lanemorrow7417 Agree 100% !!
Yeah, I’m a die hard Ford guy. My son‘s middle name is Ford you right about the gear difference GM trying to get as much fuel mileage as I can
Wow I didn’t realize the 5.0 was that fast. Would be interesting to get ahold of a 3.5 hybrid and try it out or run the 5.0 on E85 vs gas.
That 3.5 twin turbo hybrid is stupid fast!
5.0 is fun but the 3.5 powerboost is in another class of speed
My dad has a non hybrid 3.5L with the 10 speed. Sucker is shockingly fast for a pickup, easily as quick as my mid 90's Cobra.
The v6 2021/2022 I think run faster tbh
I ran 8.8 1/8 mile stock on a 2022 f150 regular cab
5.0’s got some ass to them. My 18’ RCSB let me feel almost every bit of the 395 hp and 410 lb-ft torque, but my heart belongs to GM. In all actuality though, for the Silverado having almost 45ish hp and 30-40ish lb-ft torque less than the F150 it didn’t do too badly. I’d imagine the 6.2 would shine greatly in one of these matchups.
Definitely think the Chevy is hurt by not having better gears. 3.23 vs 3.73.
Ik for sure my old Tahoe had 3.73s and it would walk any tahoe that had the 3.42 or 3.08. Something with that 3.73 and first and second gear, it was just better with the tire size and what not.
@@guntherdadson5046 these have 10 speeds aggressive gearing isn't needed nearly as much. The 10 speed trans itself is geared aggressively.
GMs torque management programming is ridiculous. It’s very aggressive. I’m not sure what has happened to GM for the last 15 years. They have gone soft with their trucks. I’ve heard aftermarket tuning makes a big difference for the 5.3 and 6.2. Not so much with horsepower gains as just getting rid of all the torque management nannies. Moving the shift points up. Guess they are worried about their drivelines not holding up. You can hear how soft the 5.3s launch is. Even with the traction control off. GM really needs to step up their truck game anyways.
@@midnight347 still the f150 has better gearing with same trans
Their 6.2 ran near the exact times as the 5.0 Ford, when they did a previous 5.3 vs 6.2 Silverado comparison !!
Both of these trucks are real nice. I really don't care which one if faster. Both will go fast enough to get you pulled over. I enjoy driving my 2019 Chevy 5.3. Plenty of motor for me. It is smooth, powerful, and gets amazing fuel economy for a full size truck. I have owned Fords, Dodges, and Chevys. They all have their good points and bad. So drive what you like and don't be all that concerned over which one is fastest.
I'd probably go 5.3 too sounds great and I don't want to race
agreed. Love my 21 Trailboss with 5.3. Enough power for me. IDC the 5.0 is faster. Chevy looks better to me and comes lifted ;)
And this is why I own a corvette… cop cars can’t go fast enough to catch me!😂🤣😂🤣
Have you considered the Banks Monster Pedal? I threw it in my 6.7 powerstroke, made the truck feel considerably faster and more responsive.
Gonna do the same for our 2016 6.7 PSD. The lag stock is horrible
All those do is change the throttle map so in a race where you’re mashing the pedal to the floor it would make no difference at all in around town driving you feel a difference because the pedal may be only a quarter depressed but the throttle on the engine opens half for example
Did a 60roll with a trail boss 5.3 in my 5.0 and walked him everytime. At one point I was downshifting and he took off and got a hit on me and still I caught up walked him before I we got to 105mph cut off had 2 2.7 now got a 21 5.0 and love it. Yes I loved the turbos but having a v8 rumble is just something different.
It's really amazing that the 5.0 is punching so far above its weight. The 5.3 isn't even competition and it takes an engine 1.2L bigger from GM to be comparable. Not only that but the LT design is a lot newer too.
If you want a real test put both motors with the same horse power same torque and same gear axle ratio see which one will do better then you have a real test
@@miketibbs2619 Then that just removes the motive for these videos LOL. They are showing you what is offered as off the lot.
Your comment makes aboslutely no sense.
@@87Bertha hey this guy thinks the 5.0 is punching so far above it's weight class but it takes more horse and torque to do it that's why I said make everything the same and you will see it isn't punching above it's weight class is what I was getting at he should have used a Chevy with the 3.43 rear end and it might have pulled better acceleration times seeing as the ford had the 3.73 gears which is going to give it a big advantage against a truck with 3.23 gears it's just think how much better the mustangs do when you take out the 3.26 rear end and put a 4.10 rear end in it
@@miketibbs2619 so your opinion on this video is they should've not compared vehicles from straight off the lot but un-modify a truck to be equal to the other?
@@87Bertha what I am getting at is the ford has a 3.73 gear ratio in the rear end which means it will accelerate quicker then the Chevy which has 3.23 rear end the ford has the biggest rear end ratio you can get from the factory so why not use the Chevys highest gear ratio from the factory it's still lower but it is also closer to the fords which would make the run more comparable or get a ford with the 3.55 gear ratio at the end of the day the ford should still win just based on the gear ratio of the rear end when it comes to acceleration tests
very cool had no clue ford was dominating like this.
Throw some 3.73 gears in the Chevrolet and I believe it would change it up a bit, along with another 45 hp and 25 ft pounds. I have had both, at the end of the day I keep my trucks till high mileage for work usually hitting the 250k-300k mark. Both solid trucks but ford end up costing some money with cam phasers being ohc
Do you think that Chevy won't cost you some money??? Haha, good one.
Most of the current gen 5.3 and 6.2l GM motors don't even make it till the 1st oil change not needing head removal to change lifters and probably cam shaft. These motors wont make it past warranty and they will be in the scrap yard. If the VIN on your truck starts with a 3, made in Mexico and is junk
Coyotes rule the roost
Them 3.73 vs 3.23. That’ll make a huge difference.
The engines have totally different power bands. The ford needs the lower gear to get higher in the rev range. The 5.3 makes more power down low, the higher gears benifit its engine.
They really don't. With 10 speed transmissions it's almost negligible. Look at the video of two mustangs racing. Only difference was rear end. They went back and forth on who won.
@@tewest86 Mustang is a pretty different tune... It definitely makes a difference.
@@ballpython365 No, no it actually does NOT...
I just bought a 5.0 2015 f150. It eats the gas but the power is great!
Not to mention that it'll definitely outlast any EcoBoost engine as well.
U need to put the graps on the stock f150 wheels. Bet it look dope
5.0 single cab lowered would be a dream truck!
3.23 vs 3.73 gears automatically makes a HUGE difference in your testing as well…
The Chevy is slower no matter what gear
@@BoostedBoyd OK fanboy, again…gears make a huge difference. Gears are a torque multiplier, ie…what gets you off the line faster 👍🏼
🤣@@RealSteelStreet ok butt hurt chevy boy.
Speed is relative. It's the amount of work that can be done in the end which really matters. 😊🌎❤️
@@RealSteelStreet and 10 speed trans vs what for the GM was it the 6/8/10 speed? They were all available that year... Doesn't sound like a 10 speed to me.
6.8 is nothing to slouch on for a big ol truck… 5.5 is just really damn fast… suprised the shit out of me when u did it
I’m scared driving my 5.0 on sport I’ll lightly hit the gas and it’s already on 3k rpm 😭 and it sounds like a stang with the windows down
Why be scared lol
Scared of what? It’s a 6,000 lb truck. It’s not that fast, you need to get into a fast car, then go back in your truck and you won’t be scared any more.
@@ShelbyvsViper Any 60s muscle car doing 5.5 sec to 60mph back in the day, sure would have been considered borderline scary back then though, I'm sure !!
Better yet, Imagine taking a 5.0 V8 single cab, Back to the Future, at Indy '72. Then run like a 13.5 @ 100+mph and tell them it's BOX STOCK ! What do you think would be going through those guys' minds ..... Alien Tech, perhaps?!
5.5 in a stock pickup is definitely carrying the mail
Not only faster,it's just better engine. Gm engine's blowing up all over the place.
Not true
Don’t forget some of the Chevy models from 14-21 have the AFM/DFM which causes lifter failure and subsequently caused a class action lawsuit against Chevy over it.
5.3l silverADO all day
Raised on Ford Triton V8 and original 5.0. I’ve owned a 6.2 Yukon xl denali and it made about 6 second 0-60 which I thought was fast. Moved into offroaders with two 4Runners and a 3rd Gen Tacoma that were pigs 0-60 and on gas but drove great. Now I’m running a TRX with a recorded and repeated 3.9 0-60.
I think the new Raptor R will give the TRX a run for the money if it has the pumped up 5.0. Unfortunately, the Raptor R will start msrp above 100k and likely be AMR’d into entry supercar prices.
Let's see some video of that 3.9 0-60...
@@02autogt th-cam.com/users/shorts_e_HuXKKtbg?feature=share
If I wanted a fast truck I would go 5.0 2 door with 3.73’s. Not sure if you need to get a king bed for that or not but I like the 2 door short beds for half tons, lots of fun.
Wouldn’t a 3.5 ecoboost be faster?
@@Imprisoned1995 probably a bit faster, but I really like the music v8’s make, and off the line either one is fast enough for me
@@alexmills1329 a deleted diesel sounds better than anything, DEEP tone that slams up against your seat off the line. I have a 2019 5.0 Mustang GT, obviously it will run off and leave all those gas trucks stock. I have a friend with a powerstoke that’s been deleted and tune, my mustang won’t touch it. From a dig he jumps out 4-5 links out of the gate and I can’t ever catch him until about 100 mph then I can pass him. No one races top end.
@@Imprisoned1995 I know guys with tuned diesels and I personally wouldn’t own one after seeing how many issues have popped up over the years with them, mostly duramax is my experience there
They are fun
Both trucks are badass, but I'm an F150 fan.
5.0 for the win! The Ford all the way around rides better, drives better, and handles better stock for stock.
The crazy part is what a tune n mustang intake does for the 5.0. I think I saw a 2+ second different from 30-110 ish
Them 373 gears in that 5.0 makes it a monster. It sounded so aggressive in 4 wheel drive. Can't go wrong with that Ford.
Yes it is. Goes to show. Smaller ford engine in heavier truck than Chevy still is faster , better stronger. Don't forget,.more reliable as well . Once again FORD makes the best truck. Ford has made the best Trucks since the 1970s. Truth hurts. Poor Chevy lovers. It's ok to love weak slow and unreliable trucks. Someone's gotta buy Chevy
It’s gears 3:23 gears are always going to be slower that 3:73 to speed. 3:23 gears are for fuel economy. You need a 3:42 or 3:73 in a gm to actually compare. The 5.0 liter is a highly tuned engine and the two actually don’t compete. the 5.3 being a actual truck engine and the 5.0 being a modified car engine.
GM forces you up the cost ladder if you want to compete with its sport truck 5.0 !!
i love both trucks wouldn't the gearing make a difference since the ford has the 373's?
Rear gears don’t make as big of a difference as you’d think with the 10 speeds
The 5.3 is a fuel miser with capabilty. The gearing isnt really fair though but the 5.3 wont generally come with aggressive gearing for that reason. The upside, much better gas mileage than the 5.0. About 2- 4 mpg on average. That adds up at $5 a gallon.
I was so confused because you had both tests labeled as f150. I’ve never owned either of these trucks but my friend had a 5.3 and what i hated about it was how long it would take to shift down if you wanted to pass on the highway, took forever! And also the interior looked 10yrs behind
You can tell which is which by the hood, light blue is the ford obviously. But yeah it took me a second to realize it was wrong in the first pulls.
Chevy has always been lackluster in their interior designs.
@@JS-nd1po Yeah you are right. Its because Chevy spends more time on designing the truck to run longer.
@@colbybryan1353 That's a lame excuse. They always suck at interior design. No matter what.
Yeah that got me too.
I have to say GM is trying their hardest to keep up with that 5.0. But it takes a 6.2 to even come close to out running it. No matter how hard they try they still can't keep up and this was one of their commercials!!!!
The 6.2 silverado is more gear for the 5.0 f150
The 6.2 420hp to the 5.0 and ecoboost 400hp.
The updated 5.3 only has 355hp but better fuel economy and little more hp than the previous 5.3s.. so the chevrolet did not do that bad 😉
The diesel like torque curve of the TT 3.5 makes it unexciting, but effortless especially for towing compared to the 6.2.
@@ProjectFairmont the 6.2 torque I would think comes on faster and probably lower in the rpm because of turbo lag but the ecoboost as long as you not in boost will be better fuel economy wise.
it's had 355 hp for like 7 years
I looked up the specs and the torque curves for the 6.2L and for the ecoboost. The chevy 6.2 was rated at 420hp and 460lbft tq and the torque comes in at 4100rpms. The ecoboost was rated at 400hp and 500ftlbs at 3100rpms. So in actuality the ecoboost reaches peak torque a 1,000rs lower.
If you compare apples to apples the 3.5 ho would be more comparable to the 6.2. The 3.5ho comes in the powerboost, king ranch, limited, and platinum variants of the f150. It has 450hp and 510 ft/tq.
5.3 is a gutless wonder. Ford is the best
Nice! Can’t wait until the 6.2 vs. the 5.0!! Get some!!!!
It won’t be a fair comparison the ford has a smaller engine why don’t he put fords 6.2 against Chevys 6.2 now that is a good comparison the ford will win because the 6.2 from ford has more power and the raptor is lighter then the Silverado ford all day baby
@@musicbass4469 lol no, you are talking straight out of your ass lol Chevy 6.2 makes more power then the ford 6.2 used in the older raptor and in the new f250’s too
@@musicbass4469 actually the 5.0 is physically a bigger engine. 4 cams compared to 1 also. Bigger physically than the 6.2 also.
And the Ford 6.2 in earlier trucks would get walked by the Chevy 5.3
@@eric6.2ltccsb You are correct on both accounts. Ford made the 6.2L for the Raptor truck (1st Gen) and it did well for what they needed it to do. But it had its flaws as even the 5.3 Chevy would walk it out of the box. If it were a 6.2 v 6.2 mashup between Ford v Chevy, then the Chevy would leave that dumpster fire choking on its own smoke at the start and stripe.
2.7 Silverado faster than them both. Drive one!
I still don’t understand why gm got rid of the 3.73 gear ratio as standard z71 package
Fuel mileage.
I don’t care if Chevy is more slow I still take a Chevy
The modular engine design was released in 1991, making it the oldest current engine family in production. While there was compromises in terms of bore spacing to accommodate FWD applications, it’s modern OHC design has allowed it to remain relevant. With notable exceptions like the cam phasing failure prone 5.4 3v, the now current 3rd Gen Coyote is remarkably efficient and robust. I have an 11 sec Whipple 3.0 F150 5.0 daily driver tow vehicle, for a stock long block it’s something I wouldn’t have believed possible 20 years ago.
It being "modular" has absolutely zero, zilch with it being an "engine family". It is just Ford's general term for OHC V8 engines and assembly process. The new 5.0 shares absolutely nothing with the older 4.6/5.4 other than being OHC. it is no different than trying to associate a Gen II/I (LT/L98) GM smallbock to an LS/LT engine. They are clean sheet engine designs. It is not the "oldest" engine family in production. Tbh, the 1997 LS1 shares far more architecture with the newer LT1/2 than any Ford SOHC/DOHC 4.6/5.4 and today's Coyote. But, nonetheless, the 5.0, all Gens, are strong as F. They're fun to drive, for sure.
@@bricebarefoot3437 First of all it is absolutely known as the modular engine family. It’s a name used since it’s introduction and continues to be associated with this family of engines, although no longer directly as there is now only one remaining, not a variety of displacements, 2v, 3v and 4v. Although it may not share any common parts with the OG 4.6, it is certainly a derivative. From the block design, cam timing components and hydraulic finger followers. Even the oil pump was the same until only recently. What engine family is older? I stand by everything I stated. There was no hyperbole implied, and have I known these engines since the beginning.
@@ProjectFairmont It is a 100% clean sheet design. It shares nothing, no more than the fact that it is an OHC engine. Maybe some block dimensions...but that's about it. Not even the firing order. As far as "derivative"....I can say that for nearly every single engine on the market today. Like I said, a Gen III LS shares more with an Gen V LT engine than a 2v 4.6/5.4 does with a Coyote. And that is a fact. "Modular" engine was an adopted term. The manufacturing process was termed "modular"....an investment in tooling that was applicable to all engines produced by Ford. You're just flat-out being biased if you think it is the "oldest" engine family. I mean, a Gen II L98 from 1985 shares as much with a Gen V LT1/2 as the Modular family, from inception. Stand by what you said....it's a far stretch of the truth. And being the "oldest" simply isn't true. I say this and I'm a fan of the Ford's OHC engines.
@@bricebarefoot3437 dude, sorry your wrong. Believe what you want, I know for a fact it is based on the 4.6. Firing order? The current F150 Coyote firing order is different than the Mustang Gen3 Coyote. The 4.6 and 5.0 have the same rod and main bearing sizes. You can run a Coyote crank in a 4.6 block, and the heads will physically bolt on. Nothing swaps from an LS to an L98. Sorry, it’s is the oldest engine family. No bias, FACT.
To make it clear the original coyote was based of the dohc 4.6 not the sohc, but it was definitely based off the dohc 4.6 released in 1993 for the Lincoln Mark VIII
The fact that GM with its simplistic OHV design is even close to a DOHC engine just shows how good GM v8 engines are.
😂
That Chevy is so much better looking than the ford. I’d buy it for that reason alone
Me too !!! ;)
Then you went to Specsavers, and finally saw just how ugly Chevy trucks are now !!
who else is annoyed we didn't get the quarter mile
Dude you’re making this GM guy have funny Ford feelings. 😂
As a Ford guy, Join ussss....Come to the dark side. lol.
Love your channel !!!!
I think the 2.7 eco is faster than the 5.0 or 5.3 😆
It’s faster than both as is GMs 2.7 4 cyl turbo as well.
@@user-tb7rn1il3q The question is will it outlast both of em?
My 11 tundra crewmax 5.7 with 178k still mauls 33" tires
Awesome brother, that Tundra sure is one dependable beast (especially with the 5.7L I-Force V8) and it'll definitely outlast any EcoBoost engine with ease my brother.
I absolutely love my 5.0! Can’t wait to see the 5.0 and the 6.2, head to head.
I've driven my 2019 6.2 GMC Sierra Denali against another buddy of mine with a 5.0 2022 F150 and I leave him at the start every time. We both have exhaust done and that's about it. I'm looking forward to his next comparison to see if it isn't just me.
@@TheWolfMatt try racing a ecoboost
@@Braydenryder09 I have, I don't beat them as bad, usually a fender or half truck ahead off the start and they stay with me the rest of the run.
@@TheWolfMatt y’all want a fast truck get a diesel and delete it, no gas burner will touch it. The right tune and it will smoke most sport cars too.
@@Imprisoned1995 Oh trust me, I know they haul and much more than just a trailer too. Problem is they aren't as fuel efficient for what I need nor as practical for driving a family around town. If I had a 5th wheel, I'd probably get a nice 2500 turbo diesel and clap it out a touch just for fun. But till that day comes, I'll keep having fun with my 6.2L. 😎
Let's see, more horsepower, more torque, 3.73 rear end vs 3.23 rear end and no surprise at these results.
Agree. Results would be totally radical if the 5.3 had tight axle and comparable hp. Honestly if the 5.3 had 3.73 gears and 395 hp it would kill fords number
@@richardoliver1621 you don't even realize how ignorant your comment is do you, save face and delete that ignorant post, 😂😂😂