10 Amazing Scenes That Almost Saved These Movies
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 13 ก.ค. 2024
- Top 10 Movie Scenes That Couldn't Save The Movies They Were In! Spider-Man 3, Fantastic Four, The Matrix Reloaded and more!
Subscribe to our channel : goo.gl/ho3Hg6
Check Out These Other Amazing Videos:
10 Hidden Details In Superhero Movies • 10 Hidden Details In S...
10 TV Shows Cancelled After One Episode • 10 TV Shows Cancelled ...
Nobody sets out to make a bad movie, but it does happen from time to time. Still, these awful flicks are still made by professionals, meaning every now and then, they’ll be able to craft a standout scene or two. Some of them are so great in terms of character and story development that we wonder how the rest of the film went wrong. Here are Screen Rant’s 10 Amazing Scenes That Almost Saved These Movies.
Voice Over by: Rob Flis @Rob_Flis
Featuring:
Star Wars: Attack of the Clones | 0:30
Superman Returns | 1:10
X-Men: The Last Stand | 1:50
Die Another Day | 2:28
The Matrix Reloaded | 3:00
Spider-Man 3 | 3:35
Fantastic Four | 4:23
X-Men Origins: Wolverine | 5:03
Doom | 5:43
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey | 6:23
Our Social Media:
/ screenrant
/ screenrant
plus.google.com/+ScreenRant
Our Website
screenrant.com/
Screen Rant, All Your TV and Movie News In List Video Form! Movie Secrets, Hidden Clues, Superheroes, Movie Mistakes, Car Chases, Deleted Scenes, Plot Holes, Unscripted Scenes, Hidden Messages And Much More!
Just because the hobbit wasn't amazing doesn't make it terrible
+SpinKing69 It was amazing
+SpinKing69 The hobbit was bad, but I agree with you, it's far from terrible. Also, cause I read the book, I must say my expectations were up high and my judgement might not be the best, but definitely not terrible.
the first one in itself isn't terrible, but it was dragged down by 2 and 3
+SpinKing69 agreed, its not close to LOTR but its still good
+RazmOnnen i liked how it had a different tone to it then the other, i just wish it had a bit more adventure feel to it tho
I thought the prequels were alright, sue me
+R2green3 see you in court!
Naw I like the last one.
Episode 3 was good because its about how darth vader was made
+R2green3 they're entertaining at least, but the problem is their main draw comes from their gimmicks: lightsaber fights and visual effects. in terms of quality they're dog shit compared to the original trilogy. screen writing is absolutely horrendous, badly developed characters, and bad pacing.
not trying to be cool by hating on the prequels. just saying there's a reason why the originals have loads more oscar nominations. well at least i just saw VII and fortunately it looks as though the series is going back in the direction of good writing and acting.
+R2green3 i still doesnt like it, isnt there the down button exactly for this function you model ?
+R2green3 first one was average. second one was pretty good and third one was also good. althought there were alot of flaws. they werent bad movies
The Star wars prequels were by no means terrible movies. They were actually fantastic. I don't know why everyone hates them...
They were not fantastic at all but they were not terrible, nobody seems to be fair and honest when it comes to these movies. The prequels were average to above average at best, by no means were they terrible or fantastic.
Kitty Kat And guess what? that is your opinion. Dont act like you're say is more important than everyone else. Personally I think people who say it is terrible are Nostalgia fags, but it is still their opinion. Bruh dont act like YOUR say trumps everyone elses.
+Mario Spice They are by film standards objectively bad movies
Gustav Luhr could you name some of these standards? or are you just saying what your little mind has heard on the internet?
Mario Spice Already resorting to personal insults are we? Mature.
It was a while ago since I watched them, but I can still recall a brief overview of them. It is poorly written and poorly acted/poor line execution. The shots are also bad, the scenes where they talk a lot specifically (hello walk up to couch sit down stand up and walk up to window).
The first one is is especially bad with it's lack of plot main character and even likable characters in general. Pair that with one of the most universally hated characters ever and the fact that it doesn't in any way at all contribute to any of the star wars saga since everything introduced in it either dies or is never reffered to again. Now this is partly subjective, but you get the idea.
The second one is just as bad just less memorable, and the third one is just average, but shiens by comparison.
Please. The ending fight between Obi-Wan, Qui-Gon Jinn, and Darth Maul had more intense action and more emotion than the rest of the movie.
That's because it was apparently added in order to wake up parents whom had fallen asleep during the two hour toy and video game commercial aimed at their kids. :)
That's because it was apparently added in order to wake up parents whom had fallen asleep during the two hour toy and video game commercial aimed at their kids. :)
Yup very true.
Plus it features "duel of the fates" one of the best movie soundtracks of all time witch was perfectly tied with the action.
Star Wars episode 3 is not terrible...
your right up ep 3 is awesome
It's episode 2
Yea, episode 3 was the best star wars movie in my opinion
+LoN3wOlF5tudi0s ok well they were talking about episode 2 ,so....
+LoN3wOlF5tudi0s Yes it was but it's not featured here. The 'good' scene is from the worst of the prequels.
How's the Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey a terrible movie though?
Crawster its like 3 hours long.
PastaThe EpicGamer // PastaTurkey There's so little going on in 3 hours. I only like it because of my nostalgia towards LOTR (all the small references, like Sting(his sword)). And compared to LOTR, which had storytelling throughout its even longer span(3hours+), the Hobbit simply falls short with scenes like the barrel ride and countless of other scenes. It needs more meat to keep people interested instead of relying on silly CGI effects and the CGI was mediocre, nothing impressive, but not the worst I'd ever seen. I think screenrant should do a "top ten blockbuster with worst CGI, as in $200m+ movies with bad CGI".
Realcfx I taught the CGI was on point, didn't see really any flaws to be honest. Yeah I agree the barrel scene is a complete mess, I skip it every time I watch the movie. But other than that I taught the movie on it's own and not being compared to any other movies was good. Oh and the barrel scene wasn't even in this movie so how could that scene effect this movie?
Crawster What did you think about the talking trolls? I personally thought they were horrible!
Crawster An Unexpected Journey was my favorite out of the three Hobbit films, it goes a bit long and not a good movie to watch when you got guest over because of the length, but I still love it
It's not Haydens fault that anakin was the way he was. it was George Lucas's. His writing was so bad and awkward for anakin. Christianson did the best he could with what terrible lines he was given
"Love won't save you Padme. Only my new powers can do that" I just can't blame the guy for his portrayal. He did his best
Honestly i like the prequel trilogy as much as the original trilogy,
WTF????????????????
True this
No he didn't. His voice was extremely cringey the entire time
So many people say the star wars prequels are bad, but I loved them.
+Thomas Kite Thank you, someone with common sense.
+Thomas Kite I think it's ok to like movies because you like them, even if they are bad. I can recognize the flaws but just let them slip, sometimes because I grew up with a movie or because there are scenes and mythology I like. I personally do think the prequels are bad, but I can see why people would like them, and that's ok.
I kinda agree. The _places_ in particular were amazing. The lava-world, Coruscant and the Senate, Naboo and tons of other locations. Not only were the places varied, but they were also interesting - an entire planet covered in buildings 100s of stories tall or a water-world where clones are created on vast futuristic platforms, as opposed to just a desert planet or a forest planet or an icy planet...etc.
The prequel triology gets some stick for too much CGI but the world-building alone made it memorable to me.
fuckin oath
Merry Machiavelli Mustafar is one of my favourite star wars planets.
revenge of the sith is my favorite star wars movie.
+The Last Phoenix most criticisms make sense, but it doesn't ruin the movie
Lol mine too, cuz it's the only Star Wars I've seen..
+ZombryaTheDark me too
Empire strikes back is better. Sith has some awful script in it.
But is no where near a terrible movie
Why does everyone hate on Star Wars III? I actually liked it a lot!
Keith K. i like it but i watched it when i was 6-8
Keith K. I thought the scene was from EPII.
Keith K. It's not terrible. It has some good sequences, but is marred by a few very bodged moments. A 6.5/10 movie.
Keith K. It has a ot of the flaws that the prequels are known for. But, its the best of the the three movies.
Keith K. its more of the other other two movies, the 3rd was good, but one and two just sucked
I know the hobbit has its problems but its by no means a bad movie.
it really is though
it is rubbish
complete bollocks
The actor they chose for Bilbo was horrible.
Very true. Martin Freeman was severely lacking as Bilbo. He definitely plays a good Hobbit, but seems more like he should have been a supporting cast. They already changed the books enough, why not add Bilbo's gay lover as Martin Freeman, something to show that Bilbo isn't as opposed to adventure as most hobbits. XD
why is the hobbit on this list lmfao
Though they weren't that great I think the title of this video was a bit harsh, these movies weren't terrible at all.
The Hobbit had it's problems but they are above average.
+Kitty Kat That's slightly too kind. I'd say they are average at best. 4-5/10
MrKosobi Some average, some slightly above and some slightly below, most were average.
+PartyPoison1009 Yeah and the first one was actually the best of the three. The problem with the hobbit was that the stretched it out like butter over too much bread, otherwise it would have been amazing.
i admit they stretched out the movies too much considering the hobbit is a rlly short childrens book and they made 9 hrs of film out of it, but they werent terrible
How about in dragonball evolution, i liked that part where the credits started rolling. That part was amazing
+Derek Furst rofl
+Derek Furst Zing.
+Derek Furst I agree, best part of the movie.
+Derek Furst Same could be said for avatar (by m night shamalamadingdongalin)
Lmao! Ay least you made it to the credits hahah. I walked out as soon as he started flying towards Piccalo with the Kamehameha Wave
this should be renamed 10 amazing scenes in disappointing movies. if you label these movies as terrible, you are saying that they are just as bad as The Last Airbender
MonthyPyton Yep i agree with you!
Agreed
But that's not clickbaity enough..
MonthyPyton lol.
Pretty sure there isn't a movie based on the cartoon.
(I am denying the movie's existence.)
I was expecting some bad movies. This channel always disappoints me.
Should i unsubscribe?
yes
Yeah I don't know why I keep watching these either. I liked all of these movie, they were obviously not without flaws but still, ...
just because u like a movie doesn't mean they should opinions differ
In the opinions of critics and audiences alike, those movies are terrible. The only ones who liked them are the ones we call "fanboys."
But yes, if this channel disappoints you often, you should fucking unsubscribe.
Bernard Soul someone sounds like a lil "fanboy" of screenrant 😂 you're lame dude
They should really rethink their opinion of a "bad movie"
You care to defend any of the movies shown?
The Hobbit was alright.
I've read all of Tolkien's Middle Earth related works. I love them. Hobbit is my favourite for a few personal reasons. I feel like it was fucked up. Too much action. The third was just action after action for no reason at all.
Boring.
Well that is sort of the point of 5 armies fighting, but I agree that it wasn't good compared to the others in the series.
WHAT! The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey isn't terrible. It's flawed, but it's by far the best in the trilogy and I think it's fantastic.
houstonproductions1 I only really liked the second one. The first felt like a trailer for the second one and nothing too interesting happened in it for me.
The films for hobbit and lotr follow the same mould. 1= intro, lots of story, adventure and battle at end. 2= lots of adventure and dialogue, big battle at end. 3= many battles through out, lots of story. I love those films because off that mould and it makes the story more simple. The hobbit and star wars and the matrix one, are not terrible and are good, but flawed. I wonder if this video will get more dislikes than likes.
Best in the trilogy doesn't amount to much when the trilogy is 3 three hour movies when it could have been 2 two hour movies.
+houstonproductions1 Seriously, the Hobbit not even close to "terrible". It's even fresh on rotten tomatoes ffs (not saying that automatically makes a movie good, but it certainly means you have to make a compelling case for why you think it's absolutely terrible).
+houstonproductions1 Exactly what I think! I loved the first one, i tolerated the second, and I absolutely did not care for the third one.
Was An Unexpected Journey really that bad? I loved it...
+Naykid Snaek stick to what you feel is right, cause that is the only thing you can be 100% sure of.
+Naykid Snaek I like your name Snaek. I loved your performance in Snack Eater.
+Its Matthue Thanks for getting the reference!
Naykid Snaek haha no problem
+Naykid Snaek Should have been shorter. The movie was pretty long, and a decent chunk of the runtime is just reaction sequences to stuff that really isn't all that interesting. At the least, the reaction sequences should have been trimmed down a bit.
I unironically like the prequels
I also like the prequels
I like the prequels they were fun they just weren't great Star Wars movies
I love the prequels. but when I was a kid I always skipped the pod racing 0=)
Where's Plinkett when you need him...?
Me too, but I wish Lukas had the guts to reveal Jar Jar as the sith.
How is Anakin Killing a Few Tuskan Raiders "AN AMAZING SCENE" wtf?
Movies aren't all action
+DornmilkHD It's not about the action, it's about the emotions and character development.
im not talking about action, the scene is still not an AMAZING SCENE!!! Its not a bad scene but there are WAY BETTTER SCENES IN THAT MOVIE.
DornmilkHD
Which ones are you referring to, then?
+DornmilkHD i agree they should've done the moment when anakin and padme come out of the tunnel.
"nobody sets out to make a terrible movies" tell that to Adam Sandler
YES YES YES YES
MasterZoyer Tell that to Uwe Boll !!!!
MasterZoyer adam sandler doesn't he sets out to make a profit which he always does the only person who makes bad movies for bad movies sake is the guy who made all though video game movies
si2foo
As i said: Uwe Boll
yesss
The Hobbit? Really?
***** Yes, really.
Only Kind of Media Well it's bullshit.
Terrible movies are movies like Avatar the Last Airbender, Dragonball Evolution and Batman & Robin. Not this.
It has it's flaws yes, but it's far from terrible.
***** Avatar the Last Airbender was definitely a terrible movie, but did it have any amazing scenes? I think not. That's probably why it wasn't included in this video.
***** Yes, but they don't fit the point of this video. Those movies were bad and had NO good scenes despite their badness.
Imo The Hobbit doesn't fit the point of this video either. It had amazing scenes, it just wasn't terrible. A movie needs to be a lot worse before I consider it 'terrible'.
the hobbit is actually a good movie i dont see why they said it was bad :T
a) read the book
b) notice how much good stuff is left out, and how much stupid stuff is made up. Although showing Gandalf's trip to Dol Goldor was cool.
That makes it a bad adaptation, not a bad movie. Try to watch movies for what they are next time.
Roman Kutsovol Ok, can I say that it was long, drawn out, full unnecessary scenes, and overall, boring but for the few scenes of interest.
Well, I don´t know, if U R on drugs or smthing... After seeing this vid, immediatelly came on my mind: "Good scenes in terrible movies -> scene from Hobbit"... What? And seems like I am far not the only one... O_o ;)
Kim Probable would be legit complaint, if we didn't already know that you're biased.
Who else loved most of these movies? Because I did!
Actually, I loved all of them except, Doom, Wolverine, and Die Another Day, which I haven't seen, yet.
Wolverine is also an awesome movie
+Sean Bean I liked all of the movies on the list (barring die another day since i didnt like brosnan as bond) but i can easily admit that they arent good movies. Attack of the clones (as much as i LOVE it) had poor acting, WAY to much CGI (it was made when cgi was just becoming mainstream), and was a huge deviation from what you would expect from a star wars movie with to much political dialogue.
+Sean Bean Me!
you hate Die Another Day because you are Sean Bean and you are jealous.
the hobbit and the star wars films shouldn't be here to be honest they r brilliant films
I was livid.
dont know why
+MajorEazy1996 ahahhaha no. The hobbit was a book, shorter than any of the lotr books, STRETCHED INTO 3 FUCKING MOVIES. It completely loses the feel of the lord of the rings world, as they try to make it a kids movie...
And the star wars prequels... oh god... they make me fall asleep whenever i watch them. so fucking boring
but the hobbit is a kids book so yh i think the salt took over m8 try again after u have calmed down a bit
MajorEazy1996 ye sure it was a kids book but they still showed multiple decapitations... peter jackson got confused as fuck
4:43 Just when I thought I couldn't hate Andrea from the Walking Dead any worse...
Cinemasins much
I was wondering if anyone would get it. You caught me officer... But it still couldn't be more true.
:D
Cassius Coleman I like Andrea and the casting is cooler than you think.
The character played by the Thing and Andrea also had a pairing in "The Shield" so it was cool to see them together again.
+Cassius Coleman You are so right. Glad I'm not the only one
The hobbit isn't a terrible movie
+zteevy dood opinions.....
+christian reyes The people that made this video made it sound as if everyone had the same opinion as theirs.
+zteevy dood kind of is.
agreed!
+Emmy CG I quiet enjoyed the movie. even thought I did think it would have been better as one. BUT if you go into movies expecting the book you will always be disapointed.
If you watch the extras that come bundled with Attack of the Clones, you'll realize that none of it was Christianson's fault. You'll see him read a line really well, and then watch George critique him and tell him to do it differently. Lucas drove those movies into the ground like railroad spikes.
Am I the only one that liked attack of the clones
I hope so
No
***** I don't love it, and I don't hate it, so I guess like would be applicable. It has less Jar Jar.
Twilight_Realm less jar jar but more whiny teen angst
***** nope, you and 5 other people apparently
Am I the only one that actually like X-Men Origins: Wolverine?
no I actually really liked it and I think 25 percent of the people who dont like it r just saying it because everyone else says so. and a lot of other people dont like it because of deadpool. but putting aside how deadpool wasnt like the comics it was action packed
TheGamingChristian Not the only one, mate! I love that movie!
TheGamingChristian Loved that movie and most of the other movies on this list lol
TheGamingChristian I wouldn't say the only one, but you are in the minority, it's a guilty pleasure of mine.
nathan mullally Yeah me too how the hell do some people think these are terrible?
Uhm. The hobbit trilogy was great. Yeah, it was longer than the books, but how in the actual fuck does that matter when it's still amazingly entertaining?
The Hobbit Trilogy was shit on a stick.
desolation of smaug was fantastic. The rest was dogass
the one with the ridiculous non-fight sequence with the dwarves and the dragon (like 30 mins long) just so they could smelt and build that stupid statue, just so Smaug could fly through it on his way out..... that was friggin dumb.
So was the bullshit romance between the dwarf and the lady elf.
And if I recall (I only sat through it once), the crap in town had some ignorant parts in it too.
it would've been better as just 2 movies
The romance between Tauriel and Kili was just as powerful as, if not moreso than, that of Aragorn and Arwen. I prefer LOTR, but I felt a familiar magic with a love that transcended races. It's also powerful for not being a romance focused on two main characters.
Rather than Attack of the Clones, you should have gone with Revenge of the Sith. Two scenes; when Anakin and Padmé are looking out the window, and when Vader killed the separatists.
RotS is legitimately a good movie though
Absolutely not. It was the best of the prequels, but it had good moments and that's it. It was a horrible movie.
Matthew Cooper I disagree.
Well that's your opinion.
If I would have to chose a scene from ROTS, I would go with Obi Wan and Anakin circeling each other ob Mustafar right before the duel. Ewan McGregor managed to give the Charakter of Obi Wan such a powerful aura in this scene.
seriously...??!!! you call them all terrible movies...??? u need some therapy...
There are all terrible no doubt
+CN TheBlueJay (Ryan Prince) How dare you to put Tommy Wieso into this, hes an artist and ''the Room'' is such a masterpiece of him, favorite after Birdemic.
That Superman Movie wasn't the greatest tho
old Fantastic4 still a lot better then the new crap :P
Gunnar Eli Sigurjonsson 100x better
i agree :)
ya it least they tried
yeah you can call it that :P haha :P no no it wasn't crap as such .. but i thought a bit more silly and to cramped .. but yeah :)
And the new crap is a lot better than the 1994's one...
I came to see some good moments in bad movies and all I saw was good moments in mediocre movies
Justin Cowley
I just meant movies that are ok. Shit I thought I could've had a good point here, but NO I had to use a fancy word that I didn't understand! Goddamit XD
superman returns was horrible
Matrix 2 is not terrible.
+sam stone Hobbit also.
+sam stone You know instead of replying to yourself to correct your comment you could of just edited it.
Syndct M I know that. But who cares, as long as you can read both messages :)
+sam stone sure buddy
I was totally disappointed by this top. All the movies you mentioned were just not as good as audience expected, not terrible
Wasn't a top 10, just a 10...
Петр Зайцев Attack of the Clones? That movie was horrible.
+madmoblin not really
madmoblin That's subjective, good sir.
madmoblin only for fans of the franchise. It's not as bad as batman and robin for example
I believe that Hayden portrayed Anakin in a way that would honestly show how Vader was in the past. How everything that happened to him made him into the Sith Lord we have come to know. He lost his Mother and that was basically the turning point for him. It sucks to see people butchers these prequels. I liked them a lot. I grew up with Star Wars and this shit was fucking awesome.
+JimboMauiDownhill First of all, Hayden just said the lines the way he was directed too, except he was fucking whiny and so annoying. I would've preferred someone else but he was okay.
I agree. The character anakin is supposed to be an emotional mess from the beginning. He was a slave for 9 years! Yeah he's whinny, but that's because he was taken from his mother, had terrible nightmares, found out that his mother was being tortured, and watched her die. He shouldn't be happy and energetic an exciting. I never thought he did a bad job. Maybe someone who showed a little more emotion would of been better.
Lillian Mae You can be emotionally distressed and not be whiny. Darth Vader didn't have the voice of a 9 year old did he? No, he did get angry but it was never whiny
+BloodGamingChannel and kylo ren is a whiney bitch... point being every dark side user is a whiney bitch
+BloodGamingChannel being whiney is what should he had no self control, he reacted like a toddler in his decisions and betrayed mace only because he didn't like the idea of bending the rules and not making a sith lord stand trial. showing he has a very narrow mindset and is used to being that slave who obeys the rules. He was a slave the moment he was born until the end.
if you think these movies are bad you haven't seen a lot of movies
***** no these movies aren't 'good' but they aren't terrible what so ever
+MadShyPie There is any terrible things about a lot of these movies.
+Braden Condray
Well, I guess you could argue that, but you'd be wrong. See, there are some amazing movies, and most of the movies on this list aren't among them (I'd personally put all three Hobbit movies among them, but whatever). However, there are so incredibly many truly terrible movies that most of the movies in this list are well above average. MadShyPie has it right. If you think these movies are bad then you can't've seen many movies.
*****
I may have been a bit blunt in my statements, but I mostly stand by it. The point I've been trying to make is that movies can be rated more or less objectively according to technical excellence, critical reception, and/or popular reception. A movie that does well in all three cannot be called bad, precisely because it performed well at the box office (great popular reception), received good ratings (great critical reception), and was a technical masterpiece. The Hobbit is one example. Avatar is another.
I'm not mad. If anything I was annoyed at how amazingly stupid you seemed to be in your previous comment. I'm going to assume by your last comment that this is not the case. I've grown to expect amazing stupidity from TH-cam comments.
+MadShyPie I would say a more appropriate word would be "disappointing" instead of bad.
Damn! Yeah, Sabertooth and Wolverine fighting side by side down through the ages of various American wars for 90 minutes! Where the Hell was that movie?!
Screen Rant is literally the only person I know who doesn't like the Hobbit movies.
Edit: Ok guys, I get it, you don't like them either.
Ultimarad meh...
Swickful Thank you for your valuable contribution to this discussion.
dont mention it, pal
Ultimarad You must live in New Zealand.
Let Us Scotland actually, if you must know.
So am I the only one that likes the Wolverine origins
Jim Brandon Tapia The wretched deadpool is why I hate the movie. Otherwise, it would have been decent for me.
Jim Brandon Tapia i like it thats why i scrolled the comments some of these movies ARE GOOD
I didn't hate it like most people but it's not my favorite x-men movie
Jim Brandon Tapia Yes.
Jim Brandon Tapia yes
How is the Hobbit a bad movie? It has an overall rating of 8,3.. So all of it was amazing.
+CutiesNepXNoire imdb ratings as your standard... I bet you think the Shawshank Redemption is the best movie ever made.
And what if he/she did? What would that take from you?
stfu
Because it's a trilogy. It could have (and has) told the book in one movie, but they had to add in stuff like the stupid Legolas-girl elf-Kili triangle. One thing that was cool was Gandalf's trip to Dol Goldur, but they didn't need that as it is part of another Tolkien book, not The Hobbit. All in all it dragged, with few interesting moments.
+pubup I don't use IMDb as my standard but The Shawshank Redemption is amazing.
The Last Airbender:
when the credits started rolling.
X-men origins wolverine was not a terrible movie.
yes it was
+Matthew Morris No it wasn't ;_;
Telgat777 shhhh... just accept the truth.
+Matthew Morris Did you see what they did to Deadpool?
FabDino im saying it was awful, hes saying it was not. And that was not deadpool in the movie, I refuse to believe it.
I've got to say, THE HOBBIT MOVIES WERE GOOD. Just because there was three movies for one book does not mean the franchise was bad. The movies actual had detail. I will tell you right now, anyone going to a movie based on a book they've read will want detail. If there is any fantasy movie based on a book that you need to just kill (even more then it was) then pick on the Eragon movie! Seriously.
Making the hobbit into three films was absolutely criminal and don't fool yourself into thinking it was due to fans wanting detail, it was due to the studio wanting to extract as much money as physically possible out of it and it really was as is that simple... And it's left us with a horribly dragged out and boring version of a fantastic story with virtually no excitement. It was also unforgivably cheesy and without such a strong cast would have a hell of a lot more to answer to. The cast saved that film. How can anyone who has read the books justify one very small book getting as much screen time as three larger books? Solely a money making decision.
I did not say that they weren't trying to squeeze money out of it (because they obviously were) I'm saying that just because there was three movies does not mean it was bad. I like the movies and I understand that some people don't because of various reasons. But I've got to say that they really weren't that bad.
Heath Dan It was so slow and they put in scenes that were never in the book to get some filler and more run time. What a bunch of pigs.
Mikey Roguish OK THEN YOU MAKE A BETTER ONE
Dain II Ironfoot King under the Mountain That's basically saying I have to be a chef in order to criticize food. I can tell when food is shit even if I'm not a chef.
That Star Wars scene kicked me right out of the movie over how bad it was. All I could think was "yeah, she died because you *moved* her and exacerbated her injuries!".
Oh my gosh StarWars episode 1, 2, and 3 aren't that bad I love them!
Matrix Reloaded was not bad, revolutions was aweful.
Agree
+DarknessXER Super tengen toppa gurren Nep.....you have my full respect
+DarknessXER I personally liked all three of the movies. There were a few sense that were reminiscent of horror movies, but that doesn't bother me.
Sean Bean I'd say the tracking device insect and the not being able to speak part were freaky as heck when i was a little kid. Yup
+DarknessXER What about the weird dance orgy scene that lasted forever!!?
I personally love every Star Wars film. The prequels were needed and necessary and Revenge of the Sith was a beast of a film with the most gut wrenching, beautifully choreographed lightsaber duel in the whole saga. The prequel hate is becoming incredibly tiresome and I'm sick of being made to feel like a bad Star Wars fan for loving both the originals and prequels. That just doesn't make sense. The prequels were there from the point that A New Hope was announced as episode 4, like them or not they are a huge part of Star Wars and what Star Wars is.
Guess some people respect and welcome what others enjoy and love, while others constantly need to boost their own ego by insulting the mental age of others they know nothing about, based on trivial factors :)
The prequels were not necessary at all. It would've been way better if it was left to imagination.
I do respect your opinion though.
Michael Townley I believe they were necessary as they were part of the full story Lucas intended, he couldn't have exactly decided against them once he'd started from episode 4, and while it's always enjoyable to imagine I feel they give the Originals a nice platform to stand on. I understand people's dislike for them and they follow a very different mood to the originals and do contain many flaws, however with Star Wars being ingrained in me from a young age I can't help but love them as part of the story. As a huge Star Wars fan I'm happy they're there as it's always interesting to discover the backstory a writer intended for their character. My main issue is it's bothersome to be insulted for liking the whole of something rather than just the bit that's deemed as "the good" by most, especially as they do make up just under half of the saga and that's how the saga was intended whether wanted or not. Thank you for respecting my opinion also :)
+Lizborn Ep 4 was called "Star Wars" when it was released.
The key lesson here is "good scenes don't make good movies." Seems obvious, but writers and directors make that mistake all the time. They have ideas for good scenes, but don't understand that a good story is more than just good moments strung together.
the piece of shit called the amazing spiderman should be here, the part where the credits started rolling xD
Haha so original and funny -_-
Why does everybody hate the Star Wars prequels, they weren't that bad. Revenge of the Sith was epic in my opinon.
Ace the Armadillo I think episode 2 wasn't that bad and 3 was good, but The Phantom Menace was really bad.... Every time I try to see it, I skip all the movie until the fight between Obi Wan-Qui Gon vs Darth Maul, the only part I like xD
+Marco Calrissian I agree but I love the giant battle scene between the droids and gungans and the podraser race along with the battle between qui gon jin and Darth maul
didn't like that much the battle on naboo, but yeah, the pod race was good, I forgot about that. Next time I'll see the movie I'll watch that part too :D
Ace the Armadillo Poorly thought out and rushed scripts, bland plots without tension, shallow settings and themes, very little continuity between films, no character depth whatsoever, uninspired cinematography, dull and emotionless dialogue, overuse of CGI. They are horrible movies from a critical standpoint, but they are at least entertaining in the turn-your-brain-off-and-watch-the-flashy-lights sort of way. People hate them so much because the original trilogy had none of these problems.
They're popular for a reason...
Episode 3 was great !
Brian Portillo no, it had redeemable qualities
Brian Portillo i liked the movie a lot and its my favorite prequel but even i can't say that it was perfect
Brian Portillo no, it wasn't.
m8 everybody knows the phantom menace was the best one. r8 8/8 m8
***** I actually consider Episode 3 to be way better than for example episode 6 because of its dramatic moments an especially the fight between Obi Wan and Anakin which was perfectly staged an very emotional
Someone explain to me why they feel The Hobbit was a bad film. I thought it was amazing.
Everyone is complaining that the hobbit didn't deserve to be here. I have no complaints on this score, since in my opinion if I can't sit through the movie than it's not a movie I would call good.
However, I dissagree with Wolverine:Orgins. Though it had it's weaknesses, I overall liked the movie a lot.
Attack of the clones is not a terrible movie for god's sake. whats wrong with you people??? Hobbit too... How dare you call these movies terrible when there are other monstrosities out there!?!?!?
They should have put disappointing films instead of terrible, Attack of the clones was supposed to be the movie to overshadow Phantom Menace, but it wasnt better, it has more BAD cgi, same Lazy George Lucas, and same weird unstar wars like acting, and Hobbit isn't disappointing or terrible, its more unwanted than anything else.
Attack of clones is my fav pre. The phantom was rubish.
sry but...how can it be your favourite pre when imo revenge of the sith was the best of all star wars :P (im gonna get a lot of hate now)
lambulis Completely agree...
Great movies, favorites of mine... (talking about Star Wars and Hobbit)
It seems they are hated by blindless sheeps whom haven't bothered to actually watch them...
Plus if you watch the Clone Wars animated series, it makes the prequels better than they already are...
Also Superman Returns and Spiderman 3, may get it's hate, deserved to a certain degree, but at least both have more depth, plot and character, than any of the (mostly) stupid kiddie Marvel Disney films, both Avengers films suck (even X-men 3 with all it's terrible flaws has more depth)...
lambulis The prequels are terrible. Deal with it.
Die Another Day, Fantastic Four and Doom are the only terrible films in this lot; the rest are average to above average.
joydivsion77 Edit: Attack of the Clones was pretty bad.
joydivsion77 Matrix: Reloaded was average when you think about it... it's just dragged down by how terrible Matrix Revolutions was. In hindsight, it makes perfect sense to me to conclude that the sequels added nothing much except for that one incredible sequence described here. Oh, and Superman Returns was 99% full of fail.
Michael Richardson I kinda liked Superman Returns and Matrix: Reloaded. You're right, though; Reloaded and Revolutions added nothing to the series. There should've never been a sequel; Neo was God at the end of the first one.
joydivsion77 All three Star Wars prequels are absolutely atrocious. The only not appalling thing about them was the John Williams score which was the only thing not 100% controlled by George Lucas.
+Only Kind of Media hell yeah! The prequels fucking suck. Today I just watched "a new hope" it was exiting and even though I knew what happend at the end. The part where the X wings are trying to destroy the Death Star got my heart racing.
23K likes vs 17K dislikes
Ouch
WHY THE F*CK DOES EVERYONE SAYS PREQUELS ARE F*CKED UP!!??? STAR WARS EPISODE I,II AND III WEREN'T F*CKED UP, BUT WHAT DID OU DO? "AMAZING SCENES IN TERRIBLE MOVIES" WHAT THE F*CK!!!!!
Big Boss I liked it
Emo Imo At least I have no retarded name, and that's something people crae more than face, OOOHHHH #REKT
... Wow.
You really are just that dumb.
It's hard to believe.
Emo Imo "It's hard to believe" you said it, you just said people take a long time knowing that I'm stupid, I'm good in what I do ;\
supernelvs I never said it was good, I said I liked it
What about the death of gwen stacy in the amazing spider-man 2
George Aigner See, now THAT is a choice that belongs in here.
or Dr Manhattan's origin in Watchmen
Adrian Gonzalez No because Watchmen was great
Adrian Gonzalez
Watchmen is a good movie, though.
Jason Brown watchmen was a good movie, I'm just going with his the logic and general consensus is from this channel...
Who's watching in 2016?? ._.
possibly
hmmmm bby
+Patrick Star happy new year bro :3
YASSSS
+Patrick Star you mean 2019
Unexpected Journey wasn't terrible at all! It may have been a little slow but it had more than a few awesome scenes that made it a damn good movie
According to the screenshot, Revenge of the Sith was going to be included on this list. Anakin's spiral into the Dark Side and slaughter of Jedi is a dark and well-done sequence.
Marvel needs to buy the rights for Spider-Man and x men...
They bought the rights to Spider-Man already. About 9 months ago.
They agreed to collaborate
Hector Garza Why? As many film industry people have pointed out. Marvel doesn't need them, they are doing fine without them. They created a giant franchise without them. They only have this agreement with Sony using Spider-Man because Sony gave up. And as of X-Men First Class and Days of Future Past, Fox knows what at least to do with X-Men with Bryan Singer around.
Moonlight150 I agree, they don't NEED Spider-Man nor x men but I would just like to see how marvel would combine it all together...
Hector Garza But then Marvel would probably never use them. It's too late. Now if your'e saying wishing they never sold them off thats another story. But if Marvel were to regain full control of Spidey, X-Men, FF, Namor and all those other guys that are currently at other studios tomorrow. They wouldn't use them. We might get some brief appearances by a new Wolverine and Mr Fantastic or something. But they have their blueprint for their movies and they don't want to change that plan I'm sure.
The only reason we are getting another new Spider-Man movie in 2017 is because Spidey is one of the biggest names in comics. If he was any less popular he would be in Civil War and nothing else but cameos.
The ONE good thing about other companies making Marvel movies is that we get to see them get made. Remember last year when we were all excited that we had Amazing Spider-Man 2, Days of Future Past AND Winter Solider in the same year? (forgetting that not many people like Amazing Spider Man 2) we would not get schedules like that if everything was owned by Marvel, they would still stick to their 2 movies a year quota.
Honestly I do like at least half the movies on this list.
Superman Returns was a brilliant tribute film made for the lovers of the Christopher Reeve Superman movies. It is a sequel to Superman The Movie and a spiritual sequel to Superman II. Its not a reboot, and it sure as hell wasn't made for adrenaline junkies expecting exactly what Man of Steel turned out to be.
I personally love the film.
You guys missed it, the scene that almost saved Spider-man 3 was his little emo dancing scene.
The Star Wars prequels aren't terrible, I even prefer them then the original trilogy, which was kinda boring sometimes for me.
Spider-Man 3 isn't terrible too, it was awesome.
+Sebulba2000 You must be a child.
BloodGamingChannel And what does that matter? It's just an opinion which has nothing to do with my age. I'm 15 if you want to know it.
***** It means you weren't exposed to good movies back then, to the new technology that was revolutionary to that time.
BloodGamingChannel I've watched some good movies then on the internet, I rarely went to a cinema.
+Sebulba2000 I'm 14 and i think Spiderman 3 is shit, that one dance scene was so bad!
i'll defend whole matrix trilogy to death
Alright. Why do Tom and trinity have no chemistry? Why are they talking about the philosophical justifications of cake? Why does everyone always have a speech shoved down their throat? What the hell is the architect saying? Why does it take 4 minutes for trinity to die? Why is the whole franchise basically filler?
+Marvel fan Somebody saw Nostalgia Critic's reviews.
Because the matrix?
Marvel fan
1. They do.
2. The cake was to prove that the world they are in is a ruse and can be changed at a whim by those who understand how it all works. A cake can taste like a cake, but change some of the coding and you have a woman who has an orgasm instead.
3. So they can let it out at the appropriate moment in the movie.
4. The architect is saying that the human condition is too difficult to formulate into a single balanced equation, that there is a variable that the machines cannot account for. Therefore, the introduction of "The One" is to balance the equation for this indeterminate variable. He is basically saying that Agent Smith is the Devil (the evil side of the equation) and that "The One" is Jesus or God (the good side of the equation). If both do not exist then there can be no balance.
5. I'll refrain from answering a question designed to try and illicit an angry response.
Also, answering these from my memories of the movie since the last time I watched them... like 3-4 years ago.
But the two movies basically are filler. In the second one they have side quest after side quest, and in the third one the limbo scene is entirely pointless and just there to drag out the movies. And there's no reason for everyone to have a philosophical speech very ten minutes. Again, filler. And Tom and trinity's chemistry consists of them making out a lot. This brings up something I forgot to mention, everyone is blander than bread.
For me, the best scene in "X-Men Origins: Wolverine" is the introduction of Gambit. I love that character (he, Banshee and Nightcrawler are my favorite X-Men), and the scene did not disappoint. I did wish it would show more of the snarky animosity between the two we see in the comics, but that is likely a relationship that would have to be built up over time. Sadly, the franchise doesn't seem to be interested in giving us that opportunity.
Most of these(save for F4 and SM3) weren't as bad as people say they are, it just wasn't a commercial success. The funniest part was where it was "too epic" or words similar in meaning. A story, and by extension a movie, is an inner creativity brought forth by the author and illustrator. Unless there are actual deaths or really crossing moral lines(ex: Spliced, don't watch it.), nothing is too much.
how does the hobbit fit in this list?!?!?!?!
Because they are racist against hobbits
Like your life unfortunately for you freak that goes squeak lol
I don't think any of these movies are that bad, I was expecting some Shyamalan or something obviously terrible, not the Hobbit, geez...
Darth Maul vs obi-wan and qui gon in the phantom menace
also racing scene and all scenes with no jar jar are awesome too
Not really, it was poorly paced and over choreographed. The random energy doors did it no favors either. Pile on a not very fulfilling conclusion and we're left with a pretty disappointing fight.
+delbomb3131 you're just wrong mate
Louis Brennan well considering that good and bad is totally subjective it's completely fine that we disagree. I'm not "wrong", it's how I feel about the fight. I seen the movie on opening night (stood in line for 3 days) and thought it was a major let down. So did many other people. The majority of people see the fight as a let down. It's alright if you like it though, as I said subjective. Was Darth Maul a cool looking character with a cool looking weapon and a shit ton of potential? Fuck yeah! Damn that fight was a major let down though.
+delbomb3131 fair enough mr long paragraph
4:13 - Film logic: If a bad guy shows emotion we can relate to, the bad guy is not really a good guy.
Lol what a world we live in that the hobbit is considered a TERRIBLE movie. More spoiled than that you cannot be.
Basically it is a terrible movie for anyone who liked the book.
It may be different from the book but that doesn't make it terrible
Get real... The hobbit was about making money over story telling and character development... Otherwise it would be one... Not three movies. It was completely unnecessary to have sooooooooo many scenes and I found it earth shatteringly boring.
Christian T i love the book and i liked the movie
"Spider-Man 3 having too many characters."
Are you for fucking real?!
+Simon Martin Exactly right.
+Xalted118 Having 3 villains with 3 entirely different arcs that need to be fleshed out in less than 139 minutes is a recipe for disaster and Spider-man 3 proved that pretty well.
+Simon Martin I thought it had 2 villains and 2 heroes.
That Sandman scene was hauntingly beautiful and you could tell Sam had a great love for the character. It was, of course, completely countered by the musical number, but that goes without saying.
Gwen Stacy's Death in The Amazing Spider-Man 2.
ProDEEDgious true
Wtf dude, EVERY Spiderman film was great! When they began the "Amazing Spiderman" Series, it started to suck. But the first 3 were awesome and great!
Cytrem 3 wasn't great.
It was an "ok" watch.
I've watched it twice and will never watch it again. They put too much shit in one film. (Which was Sony's fault)
Even the director who made it was unhappy
Cytrem but the amazing movies are the good movies
Sam Michael im serious too haha
No the first spider man series sucked really badly. The amazing spider was better, not true to the comics but better.
I think Star Wars 3 is good , the other prequels are just meh.
Victor = Sabretooth. No.
Some of these movies are good.
I liked attack of the clones and revenge of the sith but not the phantom menace
+Fried Chickeneesha attack of the clones is also shit
billy snap Opinions opinions
+Fried Chickeneesha
Facts, Facts.
Bonkobonko OK then
Well done, I really enjoyed it.
If u had watched star wars the clone wars you would not think that the prequels suck
no they still suck, but the cartoon was pretty good acutally.
Prequels dont suck
+Artic Wolf the prequels meaning those three movie clone wars did happen between attack th clones and revenge of the sith but people mean they hate those three movies
The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones came before the Clone Wars. they sucked before the cartoon was created. and even if the Clone Wars was the greatest cartoon ever it couldn't save the movies. Does the Batman Animated Series redeem Batman and Robin? No it does not.
Clone troops and the idea iself is cool. Aswell as the cartoon you mentioned. I grew up watching the prequels and I did like some of the scenes as a child. However, none of this change the fact that they are fucking horrible. The script, the cgi... everything in prequels are the reason we had to wait until now to get more Star Wars movies.
An Unexpected Journey was not a terrible movie. IT is just that the whole trilogy should have been two well balanced movies rather than three with the first being slow paced, second being perfect and third being to fast and action packed. But as a whole trilogy I thought it to be brilliant in linking itself with the Lord of The Rings trilogy.
Ok call me nuts but I enjoyed most of these "bad films"
Attack of the clones wasn't terrible, Xmen 3 and Origins Wolverine were entertaining for a one time watch, fantastic 4 and Spiderman 3 could have been much worse, and frankly I kind of liked Doom and I definitely liked Hobbit: Unexpected Journey. I can't speak for the other movies in this list.
you got superman returns wrong, its technically a reboot, but it isn't, its a true sequel to superman II. I actually liked some of these movies on this list (like Hobbit, Superman and XMEN 3) but its an opinion.
Since when The Hobbit is a bad movie ?
***** Look, I read the hobbit and I can agree with the people who say that the movie was way too long and also it added a lot of useless stuff.
But the movie was far from terrible !
+Ofer Amdur exactly what i said the hobbit was a good movie, albeit too long, but still a great movie
CaptainZapperz Nice to see that someone else agrees this me :)
WTF is his problem?
Most of the movies in this Video are no terrible.
i really like both the star wars prequels and the hobbit trilogy xD
Click. where Adam Sandler's dad wanted to do a magic trick, and Adam told him to leave because he was too busy with work.. gets me every time
Give me a break. Hobbit wasn't terrible.
+Marcus “DeadPunisherCZ” Punisher I know, right. Just the next two were sh*t
Ironically, this video was terribly edited.
What about when Chewie ignores Leia as they get back from the mission where Han Solo died? Ya think they would have a sentimental moment at the loss of their friend, nice going Jar Jar Abhrams.....
HOW THE FUCK IS the MATRIX RELOADED ON THIS LIST?????!!!!
These are not bad movies... theses are great movies.
Hobbit a horrible movie? Well thats a little harsh.
You can't talk shit about the prequels and then ignore how great the entire Mustafar scene was tbh.
the hobbit was pretty good