ไม่สามารถเล่นวิดีโอนี้
ขออภัยในความไม่สะดวก
10 Movie Plot Holes and Paradoxes
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 16 ส.ค. 2024
- Top 10 times film scripts introduced unclear plot points and broke the rules they had established.
Subscribe to our channel : goo.gl/ho3Hg6
When movies weave tales of government conspiracies, elaborate heists, or mind-bending time travel, audiences know that not every twist or turn will be spelled out in detail. But sometimes, a film goes too far, introducing unclear plot points, breaking the rules they themselves established, or simply hoping viewers won’t think too hard about what they’ve just seen. Here are ScreenRant's 10 Movie Plot Holes and Paradoxes.
Featuring:
Inception | 0:29
Back to the Future - Part 3 | 1:19
Ocean’s Eleven | 2:16
The Lost World: Jurassic Park | 3:04
G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra | 3:44
Transformers | 4:24
X-Men: Days of Future Past | 5:15
Pirates of the Caribbean | 6:08
Star Trek | 6:53
The Dark Knight Rises | 7:36
Our Social Media:
/ screenrant
/ screenrant
plus.google.co...
Our Website
screenrant.com/
*FLUX CAPACITOR! not flux copasitator
papakfmcnados king He even mispronounced 'flux' as 'flex'.
papakfmcnados king -.-
papakfmcnados king Yeah bruh! FLUX CAPACITOR
papakfmcnados king good ole flux taters
Tater tots*
I can easily explain the Transformers one:
To Sell Toys.
Lindsay Hands
definitely not. They were so complex compared to the success of the original 1980's Transformers that the marketing of anything for the movies was non-existant since they couldn't be made in toy form.
Aus78Formula You're kidding right? They make several lines of the same exact transformer, from the 1-step transformers for small children, to the easy transform 3-5 steps, to the grown up versions. They have multiple "battle" skins for each ones, talking variants. Every single movie this is repeated.
Not to their potential though like original 1980's range where you had the actual robot, whereas the current one's just morph digitally pretty much. So no I'm not kidding. Then again it wasn't a kids movie either, could have been named anything as had little to do with anything, just that those who watched it remembered vaguely of the original. Stupid movie!
Lindsay Hands NO. It happens in rise of the fallen when the fallen is about to activate the machine and jetscream /jetstream dies and gives his parts to optimus which enables him to fly. it is also shown in Transformers 3
abishek kalupahanage Jetfire, my friend. He tears his own spark out so no one will argue with his request to use his pieces to fix/power up optimus.
I think the reason Jack survived the sword stab is because he walked into the moonlight, so when he walked back out his body was healed, where as Barbosa was only in the shadows the entire time, causing his wound not to heal.
***** However, the moonlight also removes all that makes their bodies human, including wounds.
+Shuyin178 i think its just that the bullet hit his heart which didnt make any difference at first but when he became mortal it caused a heart malfunction. Through the same logic the other previously undead pirates died afte the ritual because of the wounds they sustained
+AOC Productions It does not health them but if you thing of it as when not in the moonlight their body can be wounded, but not be effected by it. By stepping into the moonlight then coming out it would theoretically reset the flesh back to an non-wounded state because the sword was no longer in the way for the flesh to return to normal..
+Shuyin178 i think the correct terminology to use in this case is that when they enter moonlight it shows their cursed form but when they leave they revert to how they were when they took the gold this is shown earlier in the film when they stuck 3 pirates together with a pole put a grenade into the gut of the middle one then shoved them out of the moonlight in the shade he reverted to how he was so he couldn't take the grenade out there are also scenes of cursed pirates losing limbs and not caring like they've done it before yet there are no scars to show for it yet injuries from before the gold were still present (the guy with the glass eye) if going for moonlight to shade did heal them then he could have given himself a working eye by taking a cursed eye from another pirate while under moonlight stuck it in his socket then left moonlight if it does heal them then the other pirate would have grown a new eye and he would have performed the worlds easiest eye transplant
+Shuyin178 I think the best explanation would be that after jack was stabbed, the sword was removed while he was immortal, so it healed. When Barbosa was shot, he was immortal, however, there is nothing stating that the bullet was removed. Or they just had ridiculously good timing :)
The one from pirates of the carribean is nott a plothole. The bullet is in barbossas chest when he turns mortal and wounded him immediately...
+J. Ackermann But he did not have any flesh before he turned mortal (it looks like it, but it's just an illusion: the moonlight shows their true look). So there should be no hole in his chest. It's true that the bullet might stay inside of him. But there should be no bullet hole, since there was no flesh before :)
+Sanne Madsen No, actually they do have flesh when not in the moonlight. If it were an illusion, they wouldn't have been able to trap a grenade inside one of them.
+Sanne Madsen ya, they have flesh and are fully there... notice when he eats apples in the day it does not fall out like at night? also the rum from most pirates.
+Sanne Madsen Also if they never had flesh and it is just an illusion then how could they possibly lift the curse? There would be no blood to undo the curse.
+WS BNN Nope because he had stepped into the moonlight, which healed the wound.
*Flux Capacitor. Not Flux Capacitator
Jaden Phoenix that's like a trust-breaking mistake. all integrity got washed away
Jaden Phoenix that literally made me unsubscribe this channel. That was basically blasphemy.
Jaden Phoenix dude, shut the flux up
Jaden Phoenixx I've had enough of the Fluxing crap!
THEMrPykelet Same. No more credibility. Ugh.
In Harry potter it is said that Basalisk venom is one of the few substances that can destroy a horcrux, but when Harry himself got stabbed in the arm with the tooth, the horcrux inside of him should have been destroyed.
Adrian Martinez Harry potter didn't die however, I believe tom riddle said he had a few minutes to live, then he and the horcrux would have been destroyed. luckily an phoenix came instaed
hunsler1006 no the horcrux inside Harry would have died before himself.
Adrian Martinez no, that made sense (because harry didn't die in that part of the series). What didn't make sense was... Nagini didn't die to the killing curse, because she was a horcrux. Wouldn't harry need to get stabbed by the sword to die as well??
Atomic Prodigy Because harry was killed by Voldemort himself, Dumbledore even says that it has to be Voldemort
hunsler1006 why wouldn't that apply to Nagini? Voldemort would have to kill her as well
Transformers has a plot?
+AbortedFetus CumFlaps I'm told it does. However... it's constantly shape-shifting. Transforming.
+AbortedFetus CumFlaps Nothing to see more than the Megan Fox herself...
Çağrı Utku I have produced large shits from my anus that look and act better than her
Yeah it does, its about explosions have baby explosions, many many,many explosions. Its a classic tale of explosions.
*_OOF_*
If buzz light year doesn't think he's a toy why does he freeze when he sees humans and shit
+Jacob Cale That's really true...
+Jacob Cale He accept it as part of the culture on the "foreign planet" he has crashed. When the chief is near, you don't move.
Cuz he likes boys
I think the explanation somewhere said because he’s still a toy it was some natural reflex
Each fall was to wake people up from the next dream down. The fortress was blown up to get the people out of limbo. Oh, and the jumping from the building in limbo wasn't about the fall, it was about killing themselves to escape from limbo and into the arctic dream.
There wasn't a fall on the plane in "real life" because they could use time that one perfectly so the drug ran out in time.
Inception is safe.
Approved.
i didn't know how to explain the different dream levels of inception either...but you did a wonderful job at it...thanks for setting him straight!
The00devon What I never understood was why Joseph Gordon Levitt's character didn't wake up with the first kick of the van falling off the bridge, he only woke up with the second kick when the van hit the water. Got any answers for me ?
Thatsarahgurlley Due to the intensity of the sleeping drug they were using in the main heist, the way to wake from a dream is to be killed in the dream while the dreaming self is falling. That's why they were using the song, to match up the falls and the deaths.
On the first jolt, when the van hits the bridge, JJLs character is no ready, due to the subconscious manifestations. However, using height of the bridge and the time dilation between dreams, he was able to calculate the time to the second jolt, hitting the water, and made sure that the team were killed against the side of the lift at that exact moment.
Hope that clears things up.
The00devon All I can think of is the South Park inception episode and Sharon saying "Just because it is complicated, does not mean it's cool."
"Flux Capacitator"?
UGH I caught that too
That's what I came here to comment on. Good god.
1:21 The "Flux Capaci-Tater" can be fueled by one Idaho potato. It's the future time-traveling equivalent of the potato clock.
What are you guys talking about? I'm stupid :3
ɷɷɷɷ I Have Watchedddd Thissss Movieeee Leakedddd Versionn Here : - t.co/SjZpZXw5gt
CAPTAIN Jack Sparrow
The bullet was still in Barbossa's body when he became mortal, therefore making an effect. The sword was no longer in Jack's body so therefore had no affect
Yeah but even if it was still there it wouldn't have caused a hole in his body, the bullet was already there so it therefore could not have caused that.
jack went into moonlight transforming into skeleton form, during which the blade was removed so when reformed out of the moonlight, he had no wound hole. though the wound hole on barbosa was still present withought moonlight to reset the body
exactly, this is not a plot hole
Its a bullet hole!
When the bullet went into him, he was still a skeleton, meaning when the bullet actually entered his body, it did not hurt him. When he became flesh again, the bullet was either still in his body, but not actually creating any damage, just sitting there, or already out of his body. He would not be hurt by a bullet unless it started going into him when he was flesh.
I think everyone forgot bumblebee could talk after the first movie
Moustache_Man360 In the comics they show that once again he damages his voice box
It's says in the sequels his voice box breaks again
Moustache_Man360 In the next movie Meagan Fox says that his voice still isn't working.
Th3mightyeagle Really?!?!?!? I don't think so!!! I think that has to do with lazy writing. I mean, it was already established at the end of the first film that Bumblebee actually got his vocal processor fix. Just never explained how, but hey...we all just blindly accepted it as like a hero's reward. But in the sequels, it's clearly obvious that he went back to speaking through the radio because he "did it by choice!" Seriously, that is just ridiculous. And you see why I'm still a part of the vast majority of people who always hated Revenge of the Fallen?! It's because Ehren Kruger is a F#@%'N idiot when it comes to writing screenplay for a Transformers movie.
I agree ,Lazy writing was the unofficial reason for the switch
The most obvious X men Plot hole that no one EVER talks about is not Charles somehow alive again, but how did Trask Industries capture Mystique, torture her, probably kill her and then she is alive and well for X men 1-3. There is no way this scenario would work. Trask said he needed more than blood; bone marrow, spinal fluid, brain tissue. You can't just casually remove this from a person. And even if you somehow could, do they honestly expect us to believe that Mystique not spend the rest of her life destroying Trask industries??
The Ricktator In X-Men 3, Charles is giving a lecture on morality, asking is it right or wrong to transfer the consciousness of a dying man, into the healthy body of a braindead man. In the end credits scene his voice is heard coming from a body hooked up to life support machines, (presumably on Muir Island) saying "Hello Moira" to which she replies "Charles?". The body turns out to be Charles twin brother. As for the for the rest, magic probably.
The Ricktator the after credits in X-3 explains how Xavier is alive. One problem I don't think anyone has noticed is: How was Syrin(She's one of the kids in X-2 that was captured by Stryker) born if Banshee, her father, was killed long *before* the time line was changed?
Actually in the mystic one is that she wasnt captured until wolverine changed the timeline before they only got her blood (thats why it took so long to get the sentinels working)
The Ricktator ok, but how about the fact the Charles Xavier has his powers and can still walk in X-Men Origins: Wolverine but he got injured in X-Men First Class and then in Days of Future Past he can walk with the serum or whatever but doesn't have his powers!
thats the biggest plot hole, to me at least.
josue mejia Well the serum may allow him to walk, but it also takes away his powers. And if Xavier has gotten it into his head he needs his powers to create and lead the X-men he can't be using the serum. It could also explain Hank not being furry and blue in his cameo in X2. As for Wolverine Origins I've heard numerous times it's no longer considered canon
Pirates of the Caribbean does not introduces a plot hole. Earlier scenes shows that all cuts, holes and complete rupture of the flesh of cursed pirates can be repaired by just going in and out of the moon light. Jack has his sword put out when he loses the curse, but bullet hole remains. If Barbossa had stepped into the moon light just before the curse is lifted, he could have been alive.
CAPTAIN Jack!
fanboy
What is really the biggest plothole in Back to the Future is Marty's mum
not realizing that her son looks exactly like the guy she fell in love
with when she was a teenager.
possible but unlikely.
+scott c Good question
+jowe leahy I'd have no problem recognizing my gf from 20years ago. She has gained like 300% of her weight but i'd recognize her.
+Mx6Own0r probably because she thinks that her son just looks like his dad like most people
+PvP Noob Yea but not like a clone
The HUGE plot holes opened up by expanding the Star Wars movie franchise - like how no one remembered the Jedi/Force from only 20 years earlier when it was status quo, or how Obi Wan didn't remember R2. Admittedly not a hole in a movie but, rather, a franchise - still huge.
Heather Spoonheim Or how R2 didn't remember any more that he can fly like in Attack of the Clones? That might have been handy so many times.
Jukka-Pekka Tuominen Wow, yeah - that too!
It's not that no one remembers the jedi. Remember in revenge of the sith the jedi were branded as traitors to the Republic even going as far as attempting to kill the chancellor so naturally under 20 years of imperial rule the galactic republic (now the galactic empire) would consider the jedi faith as taboo.
tatooine is not part of the Republic or the empire so they didn't really give a fuck about the jedi to begin with. It's never stated in any of the movies that people forgot about the jedi though in fact Han Solo and Jabba the hut both know about the religion.
As for obi wan not remembering R2-D2 he says "I don't remember ever owning a droid" which from a "certain point of view" is true R2 never belonged to Obi Wan he belonged to Anikin- technically R2 belonged to padme amidala so Obi Wan is right, plus he's old and probably forgot about a lot of things in his past because it would only bring him more guilt he remembers Anikin because of his drive to look after Luke.
Or how in RotJ Yoda has to tell Obi-Wan that Luke has a sister, but he was there when the two were born and helped arrange for Leia to be hidden by the Organa family. Also, how isshe a princess from a planet with no royal family?
AJ Ketchum Indeed!
In pirates of the Caribbean if the curse make you invincible and heal basically then when jack got stabbed the sword would have made whole in his body then when the sword was pulled out it was healed but when barbosa was shot the bullet didn't leave his body so the curse made it have no effect to his insides but when the curse was lifted the bullet would have been in his body still so that's why he bled and jack didn't coz the curse made them have no effect until it was lifted making the bullet kill barbosa and the sword not because it was removed and healed before.
Patrick Daley
Wouldnt it just give Barabosa a bit of metal stuck somewhere in him? At worst inside of his heath where it could had gotten stuck and stoped his hearth. but not a gun wound.
Metholus Caedes hhhmmm good point. the only explanation is that his wound didn't heal fast enough before Will lifted the curse so the whole in his chest was still there but had no effect coz the curse if you know what i mean then when it got lifted it took effect and blood came out.
Patrick Daley The whole immortal thing was not explained very much, it is my belief that when the immortals were in the moonlight they became skeletons and when they got out of the moonlight they return to their full body. Hence any wounds sustained while in full body will stay and not hurt/bleed alot or be a bother (just ugly) until the immortal is back in moonlight. When the immortal leaves the moonlight the body becomes whole again or rather the original condition it was in when the curse started (as guy with missing eyeball doesn't magically get a new one). However because Barbosa was not in moonlight between the shot and the end of the curse his wound was not made whole and he dies. The other pirates on the ship that are fighting the soldiers I think suffer the same fate whereby the ones in full moonlight were healed straight away and the ones who weren't kept their wounds and died. The time it took to heal could have also been the case. I dunno, I watched this movie for the first time when I was 8 and that is what my mind concocted to feed the 'inconsistency'. Jack was healed straight away because he pulled the sword out in the moonlight.
TheDarkAngel27 When I first watched the movie the inconsistency of that bothered me too and I actually concocted the same theory so I don't think you're too far off if you didn't hit the nail on the head with that one!
TheDarkAngel27 Thank you! Exactly what I was thinking! Although there wasn't any solid explanation, they shouldn't have brought up PotC in this list, because that point could be explained (like you just did) due to the fuzzy logic of the immortality.
"Mystique can't reproduce wolverine's claws" show clip of mystique with wolverine claws
Only cosmetic! If she can reproduce the claws she would attack with it instead of kicks and stuff.
+TheoneandonlyCrowMan That's exactly the plot hole he's talking about
+TheoneandonlyCrowMan She makes fleshy copies, but they're cut off by the real deal.
+TheoneandonlyCrowMan Only... During their fight scene, wolverine cuts off her cosmetic claws...
+TheoneandonlyCrowMan mystique can copy wolverine's claw since the claw is part of his bones ... she just can't copied the admantium version of it
Gremlins: you can't feed them after midnight. But midnight is 12am the beginning of a new day from midnight to 11:59 pm is a single day so when can you feed gremlins. Also time zones. And most of an animals body is made up of water so they are always in contact with it.
+Ryan Choate All good points. You have found a Plot Hole Gremlin and your reasoning is like sunlight.
+Ryan Choate In movies like that when they say midnight it's just a simple, less accurate way of saying "When the moon is at its highest point" Which would change based on your timezone. Not feeding a gremlin past midnight just means to feed them between the hours of when the moon reaches its highest point and the sun comes up. Once the sun is up, you can feed them all you want, until "midnight".
It's flux capacitor not flux copacitator.
+Llama films ... Thank you!
+Llama films Eat shit.
Excuse me?
+Llama films
he said "eat shit"
+Llama films also, it is explained that the dilorian runs on plutonium so a gas leak should make no difference whatsoever. that is the real plot hole there.
The Dark Knight Rises, with no money; how did bruce get from the pit to Gotham so quickly AND without being noticed. and also How did he escape the explosion within 5 seconds , he still would've got hit by it.
Stuart Gullick The 5 seconds or 5 min on the bomb, really bother me when I watched the movie, it was ridiculous...
Stuart Gullick I just thought of something..what if Bane's crew has some helicopter's or even a jet there with some crew to guard the prison and they are using the helicopter for suplying themselves and/or the prison?
Stuart Gullick I just thought of something..what if Bane's crew has some helicopter's or even a jet there with some crew to guard the prison and they are using the helicopter for suplying themselves and/or the prison?
Stuart Gullick he is Bruce Wayne, I'm sure someone owes him a few favors or he has money stashed somewhere.
You could say, Superman flew in and saved him last minute
What do you call a time traveling potato? A flux capacitator
god...
Boo you suck
Unarmed cops in Dark Knight Rises. What happened to all of Gotham PD's duty weapons, shotguns, rifles, SMGs? They were trapped with them but when they came out they were mostly unarmed and without their SWAT gear.
Goodspittin Better yet! What kind of Police Commissioner puts his *ENTIRE* force on one assignment then sends them all to the same place?!
Goodspittin Well its a movie.
Goodspittin Having seen the movie lately, they explain that a MAJORITY of them went down, but a few stayed above to keep a basic watch on the city. They reference this when the orphanage guy says to robin so keep a look out as they are hunting cops like dogs.
Its also not (completly) stupid for a majority of them to go down, the city had been in a time of peace, so nobody really was fearful of all the cops being moved underground, just confused of the reason
Still doesn't explain how they lost their weapons.
Goodspittin they ate the guns to stay alive, since they were stuck underground for so long
Pirates of the carribean: it is because barbossa was shot, and then a few seconds after Will drops the coins. If he was shot much ealier he would NOT have ben killed.
you could have made a top 10 list of plot holes just in dark knight rises - where did the motor bikes come from, when and how did bruce wayne travel around the planet, when did he have time to paint gasoline on the bridge, why didn't lucious drowned the reactor as a precaution when the city was taken, ect ect ect
+richard reeves /watch?v=WQJuGeqdbn4
thx
or how then dead Bruce Wayne goes unnoticed in a crowd? While I loved the opening, (bane's Hijacking and Wayne's hiding, the movie had a disappointing ending unlike the other 2.
how do they not sweat like a mofo in those suits, or any suits for superheroes in general. uncomfortable af
Captain Jack Sparrow*
I think the stock exchange would have been frozen if criminals had tampered with anything.
Days of Future Past they TELL Wolverine that this is their last chance to fix the past, but there's no reason for that. When they detected Sentinels on the way they could have abandoned the effort, gone two weeks back using Bishop, and started over. It's established they've been doing this repeatedly, so no reason they couldn't do it again. In fact, this means they'd have an infinite number of chances for Wolverine to succeed, so of course he'd inevitably do so and the 'future' would never exist in the first place.
WalterLiddy Also - by the time the Sentinels arrive Wolverine is no longer contributing anything in the past that his presence is needed for, so they should already have won.
WalterLiddy One of the conceits in the movie is that the actions he performs in the past do not take effect until he wakes up. Had he been killed before he awoke none of it would have actually happened. It does not make sense, but it was stated, so there is that.
WalterLiddy she says she too weak to keep doing this, so how would they have unlimited number of times. she don't get to keep recharging
The butterfly effect, son. They wouldn't be able to abandon him.
WalterLiddy Lol good point! And also why not just kill Tyrion when he is a child? And or even acculturate him to the mutant struggle as a young man? Seems to me Mystique wasn't the key at all. Tyrion was.
The GI Joe one was not correct,if you watch carefully the Ice has metal parts on them..so yes the ice will sink if it has metal on it :D
Damn, you even got the Optimus Prime one wrong too. He doesn't have jet engines attached to him the whole time, he acquires them from another character during the film.
Didn't they spend half the movie looking for that character too? Optimus only got them because the plane guy was mortally wounded and told him to take them
Actually the pirates of Caribbean makes sense because jack was in skeleton form meaning no body tissue or organs were there there and Barbarossa was fully human at that time meaning when he lived again the blood would just leak out makes sense? well that is my theory
oh well i forgot the scene fully then
+Phyrox63 The way I figure it, is that the damage done to their human form stays until they step into moonlight. After turning skeleton, any damage done is undone, which is why Jack is fine, but Barbossa dies.
+Jacob Bumpus Or maybe it takes a few minutes for damage to heal. Also, Barbarossa still had the bullet in him whereas jack's sword was removed.
If I recall correctly, as long as they are cursed, nothing hurts them. The moonlight only reveals their form rather than making them undead. They are always undead as long as they are cursed. Thus, jack is fine because he still has a piece of gold while barbarossa is not because the gold he stole was returned.
+tallanvorr It doesn't matter anyways because Barbossa lives regardless.
The optimus plothole can actullaly be explained. Neat the end of the fourth movvie e pulls out that sword from that altar in the cashed ship, when he does you see multiple parts of his body change and get new abilities, beeing able to fly is one of them.
***** hey
Actually only his wrists change into knight like armour. But in your defence we don't actually see if his feet change into thrusters, so you could be right
+Not Rainy interesting
Flux Capacitator? Honestly? One of THE most well known plot devices in movie history and you guys get it wrong? FFS...
I'd always assumed the bullet got lodged in the bones of his chest, so when the flesh suddenly appeared, there was still a bullet there
with the pirates plot hole, its because when they turn into a skeleton then go back to normal it restores them to their original health. so jack had passed through moonlight since his stabbing incident but barbosa hadn't since he got shot.
1:22, flux capacitator?!?
Points off on several sections in the Back to the Future 3 segment. Firstly, "flux capacitor" not "flux capacitator". Second, Doc did NOT instruct Marty to rescue him from 1885. In fact, Doc's message said, "Do not, I repeat, DO NOT come back here to get me." Doc was afraid further time travel would cause irreparable harm to the space time continuum. Marty was to fix the time machine, return to 1985, then destroy it. Third, when storing a vehicle for long periods of time, ie. seventy years, it is prudent to remove all liquids, including gasoline, so the buried time vehicle would not have been a solution. Hill Valley was also never stated to be near any major oil boom sites, and there's no real way of knowing without time travel ourselves if the gasoline of 1885 would have been high octane enough to jumpstart a car of the 1980's.
Also in back to the future 2 there is a plot hole AND a kind of unclear paradox (literally) when old Biff goes back to 1985. The plot hole is that how did Biff know how to use the time machine and the paradox is when he gives the almanac to young Biff, it altered the future which would have led to old Biff living a life of luxury, never see the time machine, never get the almanac and never giving himself the almanac which would mean he didn't live a life of luxury and would have done all of the above resulting in them not happening and creating an infinite loop thereby destroying all of time and space.
Like if u agree
No we learn that if the past is altered in the BTTF universe, they slide into an alternate reality. The plot hole is when old Biff gets back in the delorean and travels back to his future, he actually ends up in his future instead of the alternate future he created.
Its actually explained, sort of in a deleted scene. After BIFF returns to the future he actually disappears, meaning he didnt exist in that future.......so it tries to explain it.
World line theory explains that paradox away. The original Old Biff is on one line toward the future, when he goes back he changes the past which sends the younger Biff onto a separate future (another line) Old Biff returns to his future and young Biff stays on his line leading to fame and fortune. The instant Old Biff went back in time a separate future was created than the one he originally came from. I haven't watched the movie enough times to be certain but If I remember correctly Rich old Biff said a line something like "some old guy gave me this book and said that some day in the future some kid would try to take it from me" (Again I'm not 100%) but this would support the world line theory.
That's not to say there aren't some inconsistencies but that paradox can actually be explained properly.
Film Producer Because in the future he wouldve left and came back by then is the best answer I could come up with.
"I've got a jar of dirt!"
And guess what's inside it
ahahha
ENOUGH!
A major one is the music quicksilver is listening to since it shouldn't play at regular speed
Karen Leyva I like to think he has is on a tape and he is fast forwarding.
+Karen Leyva But it is not a plot hole, it is shust a detail
Both vary valid... lol
In Monsters Inc. Mike tells Sully that Sully had been jealous of his good looks since 3rd grade.
...but they met in Monster's University
:o
I think for the pirates of the carribean one when jack goes into the moon light and goes out it repairs his wound, and barbosa still had the hole in him and when he was mortal blood just came out of it is my guess
Doc Brown DOES NOT tell Marty to rescue from the past.
And it's a flux "capacitor" not "capacitator"
The comments are much more interesting that the video.
Than*
Victor Bizuett You can edit your comments, just so you know.
+Yaxion Whatever.
prime was not able to fly the entire time. After the third film when the government severed all ties with the autobots they stole the jet pack. then in age of extinction he couldn't fly until he touched the sword. The sword upgraded him.
1. Leo was dreaming inside the fortress, He went to limbo to rescue Scarecrow (don't remember neither actor's nor characters name) :)
Cilian Murphy
+Jayela BRZ Leo was dreaming on the fortress, but the others were "dead".
And even so they specifically said that they would "ride the kicks" all the way up through to the van, which itself should have been a kick since the van flipping through air led to a sensation of falling was strong enough to make gravity fall apart in the hotel: and moreover that was an inconsistency since if the van flipping head over heels led to gravity disappearing in the hotel, it should have disappeared inside the mountain fortress, and everyone should have floated away.
I like the movie too, but the whole final act is one huge inconsistency.
The bullet made no wound, but it was still THERE. When your heart starts beating again, the bullet bounces back and forth, tearing the heart apart. Why is this so hard for people to understand???
I don't think that was the problem. The thing is, he bleeds. He has an external entrance wound from the bullet from BEFORE he becomes mortal. Even if the bullet is sitting in his heart and kills him, there shouldn't be a hole to bleed out from.
Otherwise Jack should have a hole from the sword that had just gone through him.
the problem with the rant about optimus is that he likely hot his ability to fly from when ex-desepticon gives up his life and parts for optimus's during the rise of the fallen and it is likely that he wasn't given access to a high tech trailer until then
I always wondered what happened in The Lost World because it didn't make sense how those people died and how the cargo door ever opened, kinda dumb they kept that very much needed scene out of the movie.
I thought that when you mentioned the inaccuracy of ice sinking, you would mention the impossibility of the strength of only two men dragging a boat underwater filled with air in Pirates of the Caribbean, but your choice is a good one too.
Back to the Future 3: I think you missed the point of that movie and it's plot.
He (Doc) wasn't out of gas in the 1800's. The time circuits were fried by the lightning. Doc, in the 1800's, would never have been able to fix it. So he put the delorean in the cave, for Marty to find later, with instructions on how to fix it with 1950's tech.
Doc did not tell Marty to come back for him, he told Marty to go home (1985). Marty only went back for Doc when he found out that Doc died like 5 days after sending the letter.
When Marty went back, he ruptured the gas line and lost his gas.
People have asked why they didn't get the gas from the delorean that was native to that time, but any car person will tell you that you drain a car of ALL fluids before you store it for a long period of time. Therefore, Doc would have drained the delorean before sealing it up in the mine.
The pirates of the Caribbean one can be explained pretty well... To a point. Pistols back then weren't exactly the best. Usually they would just stay inside the person causing infection. We could say that the bullet got lodged into Barbossa's chest. Seeing they only transform into skeletons when struck by moon light, one could say the bullet was unable to leave the body before the coins hit the gold. What can't be explained is why the hole didn't close up first.
Cid The Lego Man I was about to say that. Also the sword stab to Jack was in and out, then the cursed body healed and thus nothing to "die from".
What about the plot hole in you explaining Back to the Future 2 and 3? Doc's plan was for Marty to get the car and destroy it, hence why he stashed it, and he explicitly told him not to come get him because he was fine and happy. Marty only decided to go back and get him after he saw his tombstone. The REAL plot hole was if he was remembered by his beloved Clara, why was the place still called Clayton Ravine, because Marty said he remembered the story from when he was a kid. Doc already went back and saved her, because Marty was born after 1885, so why was it STILL called that even though she didn't die? Time Travel plot holes, you can't stop them.
Tomnickles it's shown to be Eastwood Ravine after they return to the future, they pass a sign
Stephen Trotter Yes AFTER the train crash. They were calling it Clayton Ravine throughout the whole movie, till the end. His headstone said his beloved Clara, so Doc already saved her before Marty went back, so it wouldn't be Clayton Ravine anymore. In the past the locals called it Shonash Ravine. Doc saved her, Marty should of been calling it that too.
Because "time traveler" syndrome, when you're not in your own time line you still remember the events on how you would remember it and as doc and Marty were in 1955 the "present" changed around them therefore still keeping the original memories, same thing was explained for Jennifer in part 2
engelskmann2011 Close to any answer that is good. I mean TECHNICALLY Doc going back to 1885 meant the place was never called that ever.
Yeah in complete agreement with that, but still Marty still has his memories of Clayton ravine since he's still in a state of temporal flux, that's why out of all the BTTF main characters, Marty is the only one who is from the original timeline memory wise
the narrator's voice is oddly soothing
I'm surprised you missed The Dark Knight Rises's more obvious plot hole: How did Bruce get back to Gotham with no money, no passport and no way into Gotham without being seen by Bane's men?
The BttF III plot hole is not a plot hole.
They don't use the buried Delorean as that would affect the car when they uncover it in 1955 and jeopardise Marty being able to use it to get to 1885.
Also, there is no gas in the buried Delorean, a Doc even says when they uncover it to send Marty to 1885 that he had to fill it up.
Here's another plot hole that GI Joe: Rise of Cobra has. I'm sure everybody remembers the scene were The Joes stop Cobra from destroying Paris, however The Eiffel Tower is destroyed. The French being *ASSHOLES* decide to arrest The Joes & forbid them from returning to France. This is not even mention in the sequel. What happens if Cobra takes over France? Does that technically mean they screwed themselves?
French Guy: Mr. Prime Minister Cobra has taken over 90% of France, we must call GI Joe!
Prime Minister: No! The Joes are exiled! We can take care of this ourselves!
French Guy: But our police & military are no match against Cobra.
Prime Minister: The Joes must never set foot in France! Besides they destroyed The Eiffel Tower!
French Guy: Actually Mr. Prime Minister my sources confirmed that it was Cobra who destroyed The Eiffel Tower. The Joes managed to stop the destruction from spreading to across Paris, more importantly not one civilian died. The Joes only crime was not trying hard enough.
Prime Minister: It doesn't matter!
French Guy: 1st of all, it does matter. 2nd by exiling The Joes it only proves the world that we're easily surrendering stereotypes.
interestellar, all the fucking movie
+Mushrambo Kinniku lol
You are just too dumb to understand it
+Lug Lutz word
+Lug Lutz Aham, like they received instructions from misterious beings to travel through the wormhole, then it turned out it was actually them who had already traveled through the wormhole so they could send instructions to themselves to travel through the wormhole...It makes perfect sense indeed...
+Mushrambo Kinniku the movie makes sense until she starts talking about love as the only force that can cross dimensions then it just kinda spirals downwards into a cesspool of ginger kids and bullshit library dimensions
Somebody didn't pay attention to the Pirates of the Caribbean twist........
X Men, when they send wolverine black in time, they should know instantly if he has succeeded, as it would have happened already in the past.
GameFoLife Time can be rewritten
antonen2012 I wasn't trying to imply time couldn't be re-written.
I'm saying if someone could go back in time, then any changes would be felt immediately in the present. So because Wolverine had succeeded, the events should not have continued to happen in the present.
Example: You and I were sat in a room and I have a a time machine.
I used the machine to go back 1 week ago, while you stayed in that room in the present. I find you in the past, and chop off your left thumb. In theory, while sat in that room in the present, your left thumb should dissappear the moment I travel back, as it had already happened in the past.
GameFoLife Kitty pryde in the future said that when she sends wolverine back in time the past and future will exist at the same time so the stuff wolverine does would not change the future instantly
what about the fact that bruce escaped a prison in the midle of the desert and somehow managed to get to gotham the next day with nothing but his rags
Alexandre Leao uhhh, because hes batman!
Alexandre Leao There's nothing in that movie that can suggest he got there THE VERY NEXT DAY. I don't think that movies have to show every minute of the character's life in order for the plot to make sense. People seem to forget the bomb had a 5 month "timer" not a 2 hr and 15 min one (the movie's running time)
I don't think it was the exact next day. When they first introduce the bomb in the stadium, they say that they have about 5 months until it explodes. And when Bruce arrives the bomb is going to explode in a few hours.
Alexandre Leao what about the fact that a character like batman wouldn't be likely to exist in real life in the first place?
It wasn't the next day, he breaks the tv when bane announces five months, he could have climbed out with in two months, and travel batman begins style, for three months. It's not that hard to understand.
There are two problems I can see with your list.
First, Ocean's Eleven. Look at the floor in the shot where Clooney and Damon walk on. No 'B' on the floor of the vault, which is mentioned just a little while later by Andy Garcia's character as having been recently installed. Also, they hadn't broken into the actual vault, but the replica. When the Ocean's crew does enter the actual vault for the first time, it's as the SWAT crew, not as themselves. They came in empty-handed, but that was during the recording of the fake vault heist. The bags are then easily explained as not only being brought in by the rest of the Ocean's Crew, but necessary for Damon, Clooney and the rest to carry their gear in, later to be used to stash the cash.
Second, Curse of the Black Pearl. There's one key difference between Jack getting run-through, and Barbosa getting shot. Jack gets run through, steps into the moonlight, revealing he'd taken a piece of the gold, and becoming a skeleton. Then when he leaves the light, he's perfectly fine. While it's not directly established, that scene and the scene of Barbosa being shot do clearly establish that wounds DO have an effect on the Cursed people who suffer them, just that the wounds amount to very little while they're cursed. He would still have the bullet hole, and for that matter, the bullet in his chest when the coin is dropped, returning his mortality to him so he can keel over and actually suffer the fatal effects of the wound. If he'd stepped into the moonlight prior to Will returning the coin to the chest, he would've been just fine, same as Jack.
No plot holes there, guys.
I like to believe that Bruce's actions in Batman Begins and The Dark Knight set up his persona as a gallivanting playboy with little responsibilities, so that it technically might seem like he could gamble away all his money. Even if nobody really believes that, because you know, Bane and stuff, Bruce wasn't particularly liked all-around, and some people might see that as an opportunity.
The Big Bang Theory mentioned a great one with Indiana Jones but I'd say the best plot hole comes in Star Wars Episode 7 (spoiler warning obviously). Although there are a lot of plot holes in the movie (Fin's only motivation is that Rey is pretty for example) the biggest comes in the fact that Leia never mentions her force sensitivity. It was established in the original trilogy that she was told about it and though her actual training may not have happened in this continuity she should still have a force link with Luke to find him.
+Shawn McRoberts No pun intended but like Han said "That's not how the Force works."
Not really a movie, (Though it's cinematography looks like it) But Doctor Who is def the king of all paradoxes
True
The fact that X-men Days of Future Pasts exists is a paradox in itself when you realise how the other movies ran, considering that Wolverine never joined the X-men back in the bar, and how everything was changed when he met them in the 70s etc. there are so many paradoxes and holes there.
if you have watched the movie inception you would know that in the movie the more layers of dreams they go through the more synchronized kicks they have to do and they have to go back through each layer to get back to the real world
at the end of Back to the Future two doc traveled back in time after being struck by lightning however the DeLorean was not traveling 88 miles per hour
Phil V the big one is that there are two Delorians : )
+Phil V the lightning overloaded the circuits and the car did an impossible loop at immense speed. You can see the fire trail loop on itself. Can't imagine what kind of landing he had in 1885 though.
useful76 so you are saying the car went 88mph in a tight circle?
Phil V I'm saying it reached that velocity yes. so the real loophole is how did Doc not die from the gforce
useful76 I just rewatched the scene and there is a part where you don't see what happens because the camera angle is on marty, so maybe it looped around off camera.
well in star trek the spaceshuttle enterprise also exists and that one was named enterprise because of the popularity of star trek xD
About the barbossa bullet. The difference between the stabbing and shooting - is that the bullet was inside barbossa, when he turned in to mortal. The sword was not inside Jack during the turning into mortal
Marty: "Doc are you telling me this sucker's nuclear?" Doc "No no no no no, this sucker's electrical..." What gas line?
I'VE GOT A JAR OF DIRT I'VE GOT A JAR OF DIRT
+Aaron Pockett IVE GOT A JAR OF DIIIRRRTTTT
Even the Star Trek one isn't a plot hole. Or paradox. If you want to look for meaning for the song existing in the universe then why can't it? Because of the spock reference in a song that isn't in the film?! Maybe in the Trek universe Intergalactic never was released. Either way, not a plot hole or paradox.
+snoogans81 You could possibly explain it through the time travel that happens in the show, like maybe someone from the band actually did meet Spock at some point.
+Joseph Jackson But that doesn't have to do with anything since the songs from the band in these movies don't reference Spock. It's very likely that the Beastie Boys simply didn't make Intergalactic in this timeline or that they referenced another space themed show in that song. But those explanations don't need to be addressed because Sabotage doesn't reference Star Trek at all.
Great! I didn´t know about any of these, I was getting tired of seeing the same plot holes lists repeated over and over everywhere.
The inception one comes down to time doesn't it? Remember the deeper you go into the dream world the more time is warped. That's why when they're falling off the bridge they're going in slow motion. It's not just for dramatics its to represent the difference in sense of time.
why didnt superman just fly up.
Dude, it's not "capacitator", it's "capacitor". That's not even a made up word. The word you said was just silly.
Having watched the Pirates of the Caribbean movies recently, I'm under the impression that the curse does not heal bodily wounds until after the person has been made undead by moonlight. Jack walks into the moonlight immediately after being stabbed and then steps out to be healed. Barbosa, however, does not make this transition.
What I've always found hard to understand from The pirates of the Caribbean is why on earth did they need Bootstrap Tuner's blood in particular. What to did the Aztecs have to do with him? After all they were the ones who cursed the gold.
Half of these aren't actually plot holes
TheNuclearNoodle I agree there just annoying usage of dramatic license. they missed the biggest one from jurassic park 2 aswell. Ships cant sail themselves thousands of miles and hit a specific dock.
TheNuclearNoodle mostly just way too over analytical... And that's coming from a very analytical person.
Flux Capacitator? No.
In Back to the Future Part III doc Brown doesn't want Marty to get him from 1885, he wants Marty just to go back to 1985 then destroy the DeLorean.
In Back to the Future, if Doc Brown messed with the 1885 version of the DeLorian he stashed for Marty, then Marty couldn't have come back to 1885. It would be a different Marty, as they would've had to dig it back up. That would erase the 1885 Marty, and would cause a paradox in itself. Great Scott!
someone disnt have a child hood then for you would know that optitmus prime has the whole trailer of extra parts
Bryce Benson Yes that is true. Which makes it more unreasonable that he lets himself get molly whomped in fights. Like in Age of Extinction he barely comes out of that fight alive. But then when everything is over he takes the Seed and just flies off to space...what? You mean to tell me those jetpacks weren't useful ANY OTHER TIME?
You don't mess with TDKR :D
Okay so in Back to the Future Part II how did Marty get the letter? It's explained that changing the timeline creates a new one, so Marty's 1955 would've been a different one than the one affected by Emmett Brown being in 1885. The letter would've gone to someone who didn't exist in 1955.
Here's one worth mentioning, despite being very minor: in The Butterfly Effect, the last timeline before things get "fixed", Evan accidentally kills Kaleigh with a stick of dynamite. This happens when he's seven, on a trip to the Millers' house to give him some peace of mind because he's having blackouts the doctor thinks are caused by stress from not having a father. The issue here is that we see, early in the movie, Evan writing (what we can assume is) his first journal (about how he's going to go to the Millers' house), a major plot point in the movie since it jogs his memory and allows... basically the entire movie to happen. All of this is relevant because in the penultimate timeline, Evan is known to have repeatedly ask for his journals, which the doctor claims don't exist- but there was one?
In the same vein, Evan killed Kaleigh before he was supposed to meet his father. Which means the two never had that conversation, so Evan never went back in time to talk to Jason, so Jason was never prompted to kill Evan, so the orderly was never forced to kill him. As that's the only scene we see Jason in, this isn't relevant *except for* the fact that the doctor refers to Jason in the past tense.Other things could have happened, but it raises questions.
the xmen days of the future and the past mess up the whole xmen trilogy
patrick cruz cause it makes it a quadolgy ?:P trilogy means only 1-3 lol but hopefully the rogue edition will fix this error in the video
patrick cruz it doesn't really mess up the trilogy, but yea I get what you're saying. X-men 1, 2, and 3 basically never happened.
patrick cruz the original xmen trilogy was just a war between humans and mutants. those wars were prevented in xmen DOFP, thats kind of a good thing lol
The first xmen trilogy is its own set. The new ones are their own set. They don't mix. The rebooted the xmen with first class.
Xmen 1 2 and 3 are original timeline. Xmen first class and Days of future past are new alternate timeline. Xmen origin wolverine isn't consider Canon because its so Bad ...
0:13 which movie is that?
Hadmat singh Rajput X-men days of future past.
iamsofakinghigh thank you for info!!
My favorite plot hole is in the Thomas Crown Affair remake, which is excellent and otherwise generally realistic. Right after the first robbery, which uses a heater in a brief case to mess up the thermal imaging, they would have just played the security tape further back to see who left the case. We actually get to see Crown walk in to the room with the case and leave without it, so he would definitely have been recorded.
probably been mentioned but optimus can't fly until he gets the thrusters from the old spy plane dude.
flux capacitater....
ikr lol
John Wick Love your movie bro
+davidbowie1100 thanks man...kicking some Russian mafia ass is not easy tho
+davidbowie1100 BTW love your the thing pic man
John Wick Cheers man :)
As an extension to the Inception "kick" example, it is stated early in the movie that the kick is actually the sensation of falling that brings someone out of a dream. In the film's climax, it seems as though it's the impact that causes the kick instead of the falling itself.
Nobody pays attention to the transformer movies.... but if they did, they would have seen that optimus only gets the ability to fly by hijacking someone else's parts.
The only explanation I can think of for "Pirates" is that Jack's wound occurred much earlier, and thus would've given him time to heal. On the flip side, Barbossa suffered the gunshot just seconds before the coins were returned, meaning the wound was fresher and thus managed to affect him before it fully healed.
My favorite paradox is from "The Butterfly Effect" in which, the main character experiences gaps in his memory as a child. This is later explained to be due to his future self having traveled back in time to either change history or to find out what happened during those memory gaps he had as a child. The paradox comes into play once you ask yourself how he would have had those gaps in his memory if said gaps were caused by his future self having traveled back in time to find out what happened during those gaps.
THE REAL Back To the Future paradox: How was Old Biff able to travel back to "normal" 2015 after he gave himself the Sport Almanac in 1955?
+Moochachow Or - and this is more nitpicking - how could Marty and Jennifer have kids in 2015, when they vanished from the timeline in 1985?
Another huge plot hole in the transformers movies is how the U.S. military made guns with ammunition designed to melt through the transformers armor in the first movie only to use normal firearms in the sequels when they already established that those were useless.
The Pirates of the Caribbean problem actually makes sense, to me anyway. While Jack was stabbed by the sword, he had stepped in and out of moonlight, causing his skin to regenerate. However, Balbossa was shot before the coins were dropped, and exposed to no moonlight before they were dropped. Meaning his skin/insides, while useless before the coins were dropped, did not get the chance to regenerate by going in and out of the moonlight.