As a user of fl studio for 20 years and a user for studio one for 10 i honestly couldn't imagine using one for everything (recording, production, mixing, mastering). Studio one strengths are fl studio weaknesses in my option and vice versa.
Would u recommend FL for someone like me that just wants to record lyrics on beats i buy with standard wav leases to build a playlist and put on platforms?
@@frankblack1014 while you can use either for both things, my recording bias is studio one. You can get the artist version with any presonus or black lion audio interface which is more than enough for what you are stating. If you are going to get into having someone mix your songs I would recommend recording into pro tools. If you was looking at making beats at some point I would buy a presonus interface and buy fl studio which gives you both software options and a good interface for under 400 dollars
@@Rphillips1402 Man I ended up just buying FL for the free updates for life but regardless I'm not tech savvy it's never been my thing. I found a guy that is familiar with FL and he will show me how to use it. I of course gotta pay him for his time but atm I gotta buy the leases to all the beats before I record professionally. Meanwhile I've done a few demos on Bandlab since the interface is so easy
I used to use Fl studio but i could never get around the routing. Now i use Studio one and i absolutely love it ,also Joe and Gregor is always there to help if im stuck also hotkeys are so powerful
Fl is the best for sequencing and even create MIDI orchestrations, is my perfect DAW for that. But S1 is superior for recording. In S1 you can record, produce, mix and master a piece that has multiple BPM changes. In Fl Studio I always had headaches when I had to change the tempo and there was audio and recording involved. In S1 the management of VST plugins is fast and intuitive, while in FL you have to do a lot more. However, FL's Stock plugins are infinitely the best of ANY DAW, both its synthesizers and effects. Piano Roll = FL Studio Recording = Studio One Mixing = Studio One Stock Plugins = Fl Studio forever Mastering = Studio One (even has a independent instance for that). Composing = Fl Studio (electronic or MIDI/Kontakt/etc...) Studio One is good too, but Fl Studio's piano roll is always superior. Producing = Both are great Buy = Fl Studio / updates for life. Learning curve = Studio One (Fl Studio is one of the most complex daws I've ever used, i don't know why people says is for beginners). Quality = Your hardware. Vsti management = Studio One With FL Studio you can't have complex hardware setups, BUT you can have complex MIDI setups.
each DAW has some positives and I use three DAWs - Acoustica Mixcraft, FL Studio and above all Studio One - in each of these DAWs I do different elements of music production and I'm glad that they complement each other, and give me satisfaction and joy from production music
@@trollingisasport Personally, it doesn't bother me. It is certainly a different workflow, but I have adapted to it. It does offer certain advantages such as being able to route more than one pattern to the same track to share processing.
@@TonyThomas10000 My main contention is that samples in the playlist don't get access to the same tools as in the channel. It seems like it would be an easy fix but who knows.
@@trollingisasport Not sure what you mean. Audio in the playlist is quite different from MIDI info. If you want MIDI control over samples, better to use the sampler or the slicing tools.
@@TonyThomas10000 I mean if I put the exact same drum sample in the playlist versus the channel, I will get different options in the system menu such as shaping out the attack release etc. There are work around for everything of course but I'd rather that aspect be consistent.
Started with fruity loops and switched to studion one 3...and now so6...juat a big fan and i love the mastering suite inside. They all get whatever your needs are done. Just different. Im a big presonus fan because of their support and how they listen to their fan base for the most part
hmmm. im a S1 User. You forget the easiest way to create routing, bussing, fx-channeling just w drag n drop. And the fader flip function in this context is awesome in great sessions. For example, when you select many channels and set an SEND to a fx, s1 will create a new channelstrip with that FX and route all selected channels automatically to that FX-Channel. Awesome feature. But...the best DAW is the DAW that fits to your workflow.
8:07 the best way to make that more intuitive is by color coding everything.That really helps. It's a bit of a pain to set up but once you start doing that you'll never go back.
I've aactually downloaded the FL Studio trial and installed the DAW. Maybe I'm just too impatient, but I gave up quickly. Having worked with Cakewalk, Sonar, Reaper and the like, Studio One's workflow suits me better. I will have to make some time and give FL Studio a serious try at some point, though. Out of fairness. Anyway, great job, guys!
Coming from a background of using Pro Tools, Cubase, and FL Studio...I look at Studio One as a hybrid of Cubase and FL Studio.. I currently have Studio One 5 and its my go to DAW for audio recording /post production. I use FL Studio as a vst in Studio One
ive used fruity loops for years and years, loved it! Then I went to Logic Pro. Logic is a lot more user friendly and does the same if not more than FL studio. Studio One reminds me of Logic, im thinking of moving to Studio One because Macs are becoming outrageously expensive to upgrade every 5 or so years. You can't change a thing in a Mac vs a PC and im kind of over that. Thanks for the video!!
Fl Studio still lacks many main Features that other Daws like Cubase Pro and Studio One have a decades ago. Like MPE Support and ARA Support. Ontime Playlist Pitch editor like cubase pro has vari audio. I still need those main features in FL . And the Development of FL is still very Slow. But Lifetime free Updates have made me stay with FL till now as my main Daw.
Welp....... great video. I use both FL and Studio One. I use FL for creating patterns and Studio One for recording, mixing and mastering. They both are 100% useful to me.
Studio One Crew ! For me it’s gotta be chopping sample to Impact XT ❤just like slicing to midi for Ableton live or slicing using Edison in FL. Later Days😉
As a person who knows FL Studio for 10 years, and Studio One for 3 years and love both of them, I should say that the FL part was so weak, and he literally said nothing about the FL Studio. I mean among all the good things, you talk about the fader?! I believe you can make way better videos on this topic.
I knew he fumbled the bag when he started talking about all the most universal basic stuff in FL that all daws have. Like the controls in the piano roll, fades and the EQ lol.
Yeah, I agree. I think he should prepare himself better to show Fl Studio, since he talked nothing but the common stuff you can find in every daw on the planet, and the whole point is showing what makes it unique.
Yeah I agree. I have both and even tho I'm not all that familiar with FL Studio, I know that the piano roll and its functions are the best of any daw. Wich is HUGE for those who work with midi like I do. I'm still learning FL, but Studio one is superior for recording and editing audio. I also use Reaper(wich I'm most familiar with and been using longest), and for mixing its the goat. Its pretty great for audio too...but it kinda sucks for working with midi. You can do it...but it's not fun at all.
Everything he said about Fl was wrong at 7:00 you can set in settings to Detach or to open multiple channels at same times, at 7:37 you can already do That, all you have to do is drag the sample on a track playlist and select audio or instrument track, same with instrument, drag it from browser or Right click on a playlist track then Track mode > Instrument track> and select your Instrument and you pretty much have a linear workflow like S1 and other DAWS
Great info and comparison. I'm sure each DAW choice has things unique that makes that one the best choice. Myself, I like Studio One. It's working well with what I want and need. Bottom line is choose what's best for you. PS there's that analog couch again.
Should we still do such comparisons while we all know it is all an individuals choice and preference? To me the best DAW is the one that one is most comfortably with. When it comes to this the best example I like to give is an off-topic example. I am working with Photoshop since 1999, version 5.5. when it comes to editing pictures I can still use that version and do anything that the latest 2023 version can do. Or my most comfortable DAW for beat production is still Orion 8.6.2. Even though it is no longer in production. Occasionally I do use studio one. For me when it comes to step sequencing Orion is my King. Voice recording, mixing and mastering for that I prefer Studio One since it's very first release 2009. I love to master the in and outs of a software instead of following the hype. I did of cause tried old schools like Reason, Cubase, Cakewalk, Protols, FL formally Fruity loops etc and I can work with all of the. As for the perfect DAW there is none but with Orion and Studio One I have found my musical home.
ISAGE BEATS @ 8:23 select all sounds on the channel rack the "green vertical icons to the right of each inserted sample/plugins " then go to mixer right click mixer channel 1 and select channel routing then route selected channels staring from this track in fl studio
Great video. I was personally using FL before and then I switched to Reaper and sometimes I use S1, they are all amazing DAWs. I personally think S1 is far more producer focused than Reaper and even the tools and workflows are setup very much to make producing fast and intuitive with some very innovative tools whereas Reaper really excels at mixing with very powerful routing capabilities. But I do have some complaints for S1. I do think the design for S1 is a bit lack luster and by design I mean the fundamentals of the program and how it works. it seems like they are adding tools to compensate for a less flexible design instead of rewriting how fundamentally the program works. For example with the cord track, in Reaper you can pretty much emulate a lot of features of the chord track without moving your audio around too much. Since in Reaper, you can have audio, midi, stereo, mono, video all in the same track, you can very easily convert audio to midi and midi to audio in Reaper and detect the chords without moving around the audio too much. But in S1, I think a better design would've if you can turn any track into a chord track by just selecting a section of an audio and then S1 shows the chords of that selected section and then quickly right click to turn it into a midi event but I suppose to be able to have feature set like that, they would have to recode and redo the core functionality of S1. Same goes for multi-instruments in S, In Reaper you can just chain bunch of VSTi plugins in the FX chain but for that you'd need the multi-instruments in S1 but that has some dope features like being able to limit certain part of the keys to be played by one VSTi and changing pitches of each without changing the notes etc. There are also many other examples of stuff like this in S1.
I made this comment 8 months ago and after that I used S1, Ableton, FL, Bitwig, Cubase and Reason and I decided to permanently shift to Reaper while keeping Bitwig as my 2nd DAW.
I use both DAWS, What I like about FL is that you can detect the tempo of any sample, you don't have to tap the tempo to find it, Studio one does have the option where it automatically tries to match it but its not accurate every time and sometimes it dosen't even work, another thing I like is that if you don;t have a midi keyboard with you, you can use pretty much use all notes on PC/laptop keyboard and also select from what note it starts, for example Q can start from C note or F note if I want to write in F minor for ex. Another thing FL is good at are the stock synths, they are a little bit more complicated to learn but more powerfull than any stock synths and they don't use that much CPU, another good plugin is the stock Frequency splitter, you can split in 3 bands and route each band to different mixer/fx, you can achieve similar in S1with Splitter but it dosen't have the Linear Phase mode and it gets more confusing after you add more plugins on each band + you have to open it everytime, the Patcher in FL is also crazy good, you can do crazy chains with instruments and FX, all in one instance, smthing similar is Bitwig grid but not quite, its different What I like more about Studio one is the Event FX, ChordTracker/Melodyne/Layers/, a different workflow that's a little bit better in some cases, the stretching algorithm is better than FL, and the audio editing is faster, it also has a video track which Fl dosen't. Edit: Another thing about Fl, if you load an analazyer like Voxengo SPAN or an EQ on "Current mixer" you can analyze separtely every mixer channel with just one instance of SPAN/EQ, I don't think that's possible in Studio One or mby I don't know how to do it. Another thing you can do with "Current mixer" is load any plugin like a distortion/reverb then select different channels in the mixer and see how those mixer chanels would sound if they had that distortion plugin. In Fl you can also use any mixer as a send while in S1 you need a bus or fx, which kinda sux, not only that but in FL you can use a sender before some plugins are applied, mby you have some distortion for example but you want to send clean sound to Reverb FX.
I really like the concept behind this video series, however, I feel that this one lacks depth and the title is somewhat misleading as it primarily compares some random nice features of S1 and FL. I have been using Cubase for several years now and the only DAW that I regularly consider switching back to from time to time is FL. (I also really like S1 btw because it feels like a modernized version of Cubase, but it also lacks some of my favorite features from Cubase). While I liked the way in which ISAGE BEATS presented the things he likes about FL, they really lacked substance. With regards to the piano roll alone, there is so much more to talk about. In short, the piano roll is just a joy to work with due to its ease of use and numerous great tools. Some examples of what I love about the piano roll: - Left click: add, Right click delete (wish all DAWs had this) - “Saves” length of last midi note - All the great tools and how nicely they are implemented (brush, paint, cut, etc…). - Chopper, Randomizer, Strum-Tool, Arpeggiator, riff machine - Intelligent Duplicating (with space left at the end etc) - Stretching, Flipping/Mirroring Midi-Notes - The infamous glide notes (i think ableton does midi glides the best by now, but FL is second imho) - Ghost Notes What makes the piano roll in FL special to me is not just its list of features, but also its USABILITY. For example, while the Piano Roll in Cubase and S1 may have many or even more features, using it is just not as enjoyable as it is in FL due to small differences that add up. For instance, Cubase has ghost notes, but they are not practical for me as clicking on one also always selects it. Or, while I can randomize MIDI in Cubase with an MIDI effect or macro, it is not as effortless and fun as within the randomizer in FL. The list goes on... In conclusion, if I were to spend most of my time in the piano roll, I would still be using FL. However, since working with audio files in the playlist is still challenging in FL, I eventually switched to the DAW that (some years ago) had the second best piano roll, great audio editing, and excellent mixing features. To me, using Cubase is not the best of both worlds, but the best compromise for now. If you are really interested in what makes FL Studio (21) great, I can highly recommend some Videos on Benn Jordans Channel.
Been using Cockos REAPER since it's 1st version and haven't had a reason to change yet. However, I recently got Studio One 6 Professional for free with a new interface I bought. After seeing this video might have to give it a try now since it seems to be very similar to REAPER which I love. Also those Presonus stock plugins came in very highly recommended by many of my friends as well. The only thing that has me on the fence is that this is yet another DAW that is CPU/resource heavy. It's one of the main reason I have stuck with REAPER since it's inception. There is just no reason for DAWs to be so resource heavy with modern day tech. Still will be giving it a try none the less.
Thank you. I use studio one artist but was considering fl studio. I make video game music so 90% of the time, i will be using midi. Having good control of the piano role would be great. plus it sucks that S1 doesn't have middle mouse panning
personally i never got the fl studio ui then i got used to garage band which which helped me swich to logic and now m switching to studio 1⃣ which is easy and similar to use but has way more relevent fetures❤
after using FL studio for over 10years, i made the change to studio one 6 and im very impressed. studio one is all round better, the new stock plug ins blow all the FL studio ones out the park, if your someone who uses alot of analog hardware and plays live, studio one is the one for you. FL is amazing also but way more user friendly for a someone starting out. it also crashes alot, persoanlly if you want to produce more like a pro out the box i would steer clear of FL studio. but for a bedroom producer its great.
hi Isage Beats,i own fl studio and studio one,for me,each DAW is optimised for different music genre's,fl studio for making beats,studio one for making orchestral scores,btw, fl studio is not a linear DAW,so like you've mentioned you can place everything averywhere and you're right,if you have a big template you will get confused as to where everything is,however there's a minimallistic solution when you right click on a track you can enable "lock to content" so this instrument cant be moved to another track bummer is that you'll have to do this with all new instrument tracks,there is no global lock to content for all tracks pfff 😁 maybe something to ask the good people at image line to include that in a next update,cheers mate
"btw, fl studio is not a linear DAW,so like you've mentioned you can place everything averywhere and you're right,if you have a big template you will get confused as to where everything" That's wrong, you can use FL as a linear DAW but beatmakers don't know about it lol, instead of adding instrument from channel rack you can drag it from browser into a Track playlist, or you can right click on a Track playlist Track mode > Instrument track > and select your instrument, that way it automatically routes it to a mixer/auto names it, every automation you do for that sound will automatically be grouped, its basically same workflow as a Linear daw. And you do same with samples, instead of putting them in channel rack or randomly in playlist you put them on a Track Playlist and select audio track if you want waveform or Insturment track if you want to make it in a midi pattern.
Dude! I'm new to FL Studio and that comment about playlist not automatically matching up with a track number on the mixer drives me nuts. Tony Thomas in comment below says that it happens automatically when you drop an instrument into a playlist track but I'm NOT seeing that. I do have the latest FL Studio version and it seems like you have to recreate what's on the playlist again on the mixer.
In my own opinion I wouldn't use anything but studio one. I have been with it since it premiered at the tape op convention in sxsw forever ago.... I'm a presonus fan period! Their tube pres armed with an assortment of tubes are my all time favorite... upgrade the tube and it competes with any others and often tops higend preamps.. I appreciate your channel homie. Your efforts and manor of delivery. Beats listening to all the arrogant pekerheds who deliver in their typical cocky influencer methods or whatever their true objectives are... most offer nothin more than "hey look at me, I know what you don't" haha.. Good shiit bro...
Ayyyy thank you. I don’t know everything. I’m not trying to help everyone. I do know one thing. Studio One and how to make music with it 😂 and I just share it here. Thank you again.
I've never had that routing issue with S1 so I am confused why you to. All my tracks are always automatically assigned and routed properly until I change them making buses or VCAs etc. (Not a full S1 user. Ableton Gang all day. I use it mainly for recording and sometimes mixing)
I have both & they are both awesome in thier own ways. If S1 had a better piano roll that was more like FL...look the f out it'd be the 🐐! I would love to see better integration with Maschine...in all the daws. Also, S1 gives me a lot of grief while I'm trying to work in the timeline. Locating and staying located on a specific area of a track is a pain. Does anyone else have this problem? I'm used to and have more experience with Reaper, and it's just way easier to work the timeline.
Just set a time loop at the location and there are many other ways to do this within Studio One. And since version 6.5 it now has Dolby Atmos,' for those of you who are interested. I actually don't know of many DAWs that actually do have it.
In fl studio, in the arrangement area, you know, we can arrange a kick as a wav track with one click, and then we can delete the wav we put with one click again by clicking on it. can you do the same feature in studio one?
Curiosly the parametric Eq is less transparent Parametric Eq of Any Stock DAW xD. Some Engeniers know when something comes from FL when they mix it with this plugin XD
FL studio is a complete Musicians Software, but Studio One has more hand in Audio Recording/Editing/Mastering and Video production. (from my experience)
Maybe you know how to make same size of notes for all tracks in S1. Every time when I open midi editor I need to adjust size of notes)) I hate this in S1))
FL is not in a conversation, special for the 3 most important thinks for producers, mixing, mastering and production! 1) Ableton Live 2) Protools 3) Cubase 4) Studio One 5)Logic Pro 6) Fl 7) Garage Band
Friend, I need your help. Do you know how I can duplicate midi notes to the left instead of right in studio one? Because if I click on the D key, it duplicates the midi notes only to the right on the piano roll.
User preference i guess. Started with Logic, tried FL and didn't care for it. Went to Cubase and used that DAW for several years until i tried Studio one. Studio one is now my preference for the past couple of years.
I am confused because FL Studio is weird because it doesn’t select and create notes the same way other DAW’s work! It does thing’s differently which is not intuitive to those who have used other DAW’s prior to using FL Studio! I don’t enjoy the FL Studio Workflow I haven’t got use to it yet maybe I will feel differently when it clicks with me! But it seems to have a completely different workflow that is confusing to start with but if I started with this workflow it would probably be easier! But coming from other DAW’s it makes no sense to begin with & feels alien but those who started in FL Studio will say it is the most intuitive! But I started in Cubase Years ago then Logic Pro to Ableton Live going back to Cubase just have to relearn that Program again because it’s been so long! Studio One is good but need to learn it as well! Ableton Live is the Most easiest once it clicks because to start with it is confusing too because it looks totally different to other DAW’s like FL STUDIO is totally different from other DAW’s once it clicks then the appreciation comes into effect until then they are confusing!
@@ProducingInTheBoxat 10:56 you show how the audio recognizes and converts it to chords but I have tried and no chords appear, what am I missing? It doesn't work for me, do you know what it could be?
I'm sorry but you picked the wrong user to represent FL Studio, imho atleast. FL have extremely complex and creative features that most of those 'beatmakers' don't know about. Anddd parametric EQ2 is sooo out of date, nowhere near to other DAWs main stock EQ. No M/S or seperate L/R feature, no dynamic EQing feature etc. FL shines with its stock instrument plugins, like FLEX for example. The updated playlist also gives you an option to lay down your tracks in a more traditional way now. Some complex/advanced routing can also be extremely helpful while doing hybrid mixing.
You really needed to compare apples to apples. The midi section and piano roll is very powerful and can do most of FL studios piano roll plus a few things easier to do against fl.
@@danielpassmore5026 Let me guess . Youve been on a cracked version of FL and never took the time to learn many other piano rolls on different DAWS .. LOL. s1 paino roll is very VERY capable dude .
I *strongly* prefer Studio One over FL Studio, especially because of the general workflow. My main issue is with its stability and bugginess. I don't know how it is for FL Studio, but S1 just crashes way too often for me. And yes, I know it's usually the plugin's fault, but at the end of the day, I don't care who it was. My session crashed, my flow is ruined and that's what counts. I wish they had sandboxing for third party plugins. Also, the internal routing becomes buggy regularly, with pretty much the same effect. If it weren't for those two issues, S1 would remain my favorite DAW. But lately, I find myself using Bitwig more and more, even though I find S1 more capable and better workflow wise. For example, I miss the whole arranger track functionality soooo much! That's maybe my favorite thing about S1. How they solved a ton of workflow issues with consistent concepts. And the arranger track in specific (but also the other ones). The lyrics track is brilliant imho.
Почему никто не говорит про действительно плохую сторону fl studio? У кого не спрошу, у всех она плохо дружит с vst плагинами, то должно грузит, то процессор нагружает, одним словом : плохо оптимизирована. Я очень люблю fl , но из-за плохой оптимизации иногда не возможно работать. В s1 все плагины и банки контакта грузятся очень быстро, буквально 1-2 секунды, сколько плагинов не включай - все работает ровно и быстро, чего до сих пор нет в fl. Зато fade in fade out на сэмплы на дорожке добавили!😂😂😂 Буду разбираться в первой студии, потом может окончательно перейду на неё.
Let's begin FL studio Painting tool while making or arranging your patterns is the most unique, used feature for FL studio Cooking your arrangements as easy as that Patcher is the ultimate. Holy grail Stock plugins default preset is almist the most lovely of all DAW'S Midi-out as a plugin is a killer feature Keeping a tasty one for itself like Soundgoodizer Just through it on, it will sound good! The best customized ASIO Driver even better than the original universal one itself! Saved me a lot, still The fastest ever to open The best DAW to rewire with studio one even better than Abelton live Badzzz:- Where is where , routingzzzz Intimidating even still after a while Its work flow still baaaad like avid Studio one My sweet heart one The ever best friendly looking one The best in work flow Macro feature ARA, melodyne communication is wow Drag, drop everything, presets Chord track Multi instruments in a single track Splitter as a plugin is the killing feature for studio one Key shortcuts, but for easier workflow you need to make more of your own the way you like Badzzz:- Bad in its own company instrument support! Just those instruments only?! Look at Reason, Abelton, Fl studio Please make more of your own Almost all of us has jumped to another do just for a plugin or instrument there! The best of all time is Reason The most ever generous ones to make all their effects, instruments as a plugin for other Daw's That helped the heck me a lot Ofcourse Abelton live M4L comunity is galaxy in itself but MACRO feature in studio one opened a new level even it's still way behind Logic pro sampler, Abelton Simpler is much above both DAW'S sampler Abelton has 2 views built-in, ready for you is a good feature this will help more FL studio but still good addition to studio one No Midi-out in instrument track in studio one is a shame No customized ASIO Driver for studio one Buit in presets for its instruments is not that good , you need to buy a better ones or become a sound designer, make yours No updates for its sampler for years especially the start, end markers of the loop range automation feature , graining, binding a built-in LFO to its knobs
People use FL because it's cheaper. FL is a pain in the ass compared to Studio One. S1 is light years ahead of FL when it comes to ease of use. I was using FL since 4. To this day with ver. 21 picking plugins and setting up instruments is still a visual mess and just plain SUCKS. FL STILL to this day can't size plugins right. The FL mixer is still the most illogical thing I've come across. Image Line needs to take lessons from Presonus on how things should be set up and they might survive. - S1 is so organized and simple drag and drop and your ready to go instantly with just about everything. No thought required and the damn plugins fantastically organized, are sized properly and easy to see. I'll never use FL again. S1 is way worth the price.
Very bad experience with studio one. Always faced high cpu usage even using stock plugins. It could not be able to play their demo project without crackling sound.
The only time i had a cpu problem with S1 was using very cpu hungry plugin in a slow cpu PC ( 1.7 GHz). Once I switched to a normal cpu (2.5 GHz) the same plugin run's ok. Other perfomance problems were solved once I learned how to configure basic parameters like the buffer size. Today My only concern is with memory cause i have only 8 GB.
I bothered to watch this video cause I was curious to hear what he has to say bout FL Studio. In Studio One you can do preaty much the same in the piano roll as in FL, in many cases much easier. The stuck plugins in Studio One are way much advanced. The parametric EQ in FL is one million light-years far away to be something like the Pro EQ3 in S1.
Fl stock plugins are better then studio one, that where studio one lacks, stock stuff, but if studio one team up with some plugins company imagine... haha...fabfilter or something like that :P
![SAFEPLANET - ดาวเคราะห์ [ THE PLANET ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4X1XL3I_k3c/mqdefault.jpg)
Want to learn the 3 secrets to mixing vocals? Watch my free workshop below 👇
www.producinginthebox.com/workshop
I love FL Studio but I switched to Studio One ten years ago. At first I missed the FL Studio piano roll but PreSonus has played catch up quite well.
As a user of fl studio for 20 years and a user for studio one for 10 i honestly couldn't imagine using one for everything (recording, production, mixing, mastering). Studio one strengths are fl studio weaknesses in my option and vice versa.
Would u recommend FL for someone like me that just wants to record lyrics on beats i buy with standard wav leases to build a playlist and put on platforms?
@@frankblack1014 while you can use either for both things, my recording bias is studio one. You can get the artist version with any presonus or black lion audio interface which is more than enough for what you are stating. If you are going to get into having someone mix your songs I would recommend recording into pro tools. If you was looking at making beats at some point I would buy a presonus interface and buy fl studio which gives you both software options and a good interface for under 400 dollars
@@frankblack1014recording into studio one is much better than fl studio
@@Rphillips1402 Man I ended up just buying FL for the free updates for life but regardless I'm not tech savvy it's never been my thing. I found a guy that is familiar with FL and he will show me how to use it. I of course gotta pay him for his time but atm I gotta buy the leases to all the beats before I record professionally. Meanwhile I've done a few demos on Bandlab since the interface is so easy
I used to use Fl studio but i could never get around the routing. Now i use Studio one and i absolutely love it ,also Joe and Gregor is always there to help if im stuck also hotkeys are so powerful
I love both. Do all the writing in FL, all mixing and editing in S1
This is the way.
Fl is the best for sequencing and even create MIDI orchestrations, is my perfect DAW for that. But S1 is superior for recording. In S1 you can record, produce, mix and master a piece that has multiple BPM changes. In Fl Studio I always had headaches when I had to change the tempo and there was audio and recording involved.
In S1 the management of VST plugins is fast and intuitive, while in FL you have to do a lot more.
However, FL's Stock plugins are infinitely the best of ANY DAW, both its synthesizers and effects.
Piano Roll = FL Studio
Recording = Studio One
Mixing = Studio One
Stock Plugins = Fl Studio forever
Mastering = Studio One (even has a independent instance for that).
Composing = Fl Studio (electronic or MIDI/Kontakt/etc...) Studio One is good too, but Fl Studio's piano roll is always superior.
Producing = Both are great
Buy = Fl Studio / updates for life.
Learning curve = Studio One (Fl Studio is one of the most complex daws I've ever used, i don't know why people says is for beginners).
Quality = Your hardware.
Vsti management = Studio One
With FL Studio you can't have complex hardware setups, BUT you can have complex MIDI setups.
each DAW has some positives and I use three DAWs - Acoustica Mixcraft, FL Studio and above all Studio One - in each of these DAWs I do different elements of music production and I'm glad that they complement each other, and give me satisfaction and joy from production music
Please make another video. With someone who know the DAW.
😂😂
When he right clicked on FL to reset knobs and to open the piano roll 💀
LMFAO
Just call Alex Moukala the man himself 🗿
Since FL 20, you can drag and drop an instrument to a playlist track and it auto assigns it to a mixer track and the channel rack. Very easy to do!
There's still a lot of features that require going back to the channel rack though. I wish they could get rid of that but so many people rely on it.
@@trollingisasport Personally, it doesn't bother me. It is certainly a different workflow, but I have adapted to it. It does offer certain advantages such as being able to route more than one pattern to the same track to share processing.
@@TonyThomas10000 My main contention is that samples in the playlist don't get access to the same tools as in the channel. It seems like it would be an easy fix but who knows.
@@trollingisasport Not sure what you mean. Audio in the playlist is quite different from MIDI info. If you want MIDI control over samples, better to use the sampler or the slicing tools.
@@TonyThomas10000 I mean if I put the exact same drum sample in the playlist versus the channel, I will get different options in the system menu such as shaping out the attack release etc. There are work around for everything of course but I'd rather that aspect be consistent.
Started with fruity loops and switched to studion one 3...and now so6...juat a big fan and i love the mastering suite inside. They all get whatever your needs are done. Just different. Im a big presonus fan because of their support and how they listen to their fan base for the most part
hmmm. im a S1 User. You forget the easiest way to create routing, bussing, fx-channeling just w drag n drop. And the fader flip function in this context is awesome in great sessions. For example, when you select many channels and set an SEND to a fx, s1 will create a new channelstrip with that FX and route all selected channels automatically to that FX-Channel. Awesome feature.
But...the best DAW is the DAW that fits to your workflow.
8:07 the best way to make that more intuitive is by color coding everything.That really helps. It's a bit of a pain to set up but once you start doing that you'll never go back.
FL Studio performance mode is super powerful. Even more powerful than Ableton the way you can sync and launch clips and trigger automation separately.
Studio one is Powerful💪 and simple😊 DAW. I like it ❤
I've aactually downloaded the FL Studio trial and installed the DAW. Maybe I'm just too impatient, but I gave up quickly. Having worked with Cakewalk, Sonar, Reaper and the like, Studio One's workflow suits me better. I will have to make some time and give FL Studio a serious try at some point, though. Out of fairness. Anyway, great job, guys!
Dude, the separation between tracks and channels is a pro in my book! Also, as of Studio One 6.5, Dolby Atmos support is here!
Was about to say the same thing I feel like both of them never googled some of this stuff before making a video 😂
Coming from a background of using Pro Tools, Cubase, and FL Studio...I look at Studio One as a hybrid of Cubase and FL Studio.. I currently have Studio One 5 and its my go to DAW for audio recording /post production. I use FL Studio as a vst in Studio One
How to use that?
ive used fruity loops for years and years, loved it! Then I went to Logic Pro. Logic is a lot more user friendly and does the same if not more than FL studio. Studio One reminds me of Logic, im thinking of moving to Studio One because Macs are becoming outrageously expensive to upgrade every 5 or so years. You can't change a thing in a Mac vs a PC and im kind of over that. Thanks for the video!!
Fl Studio still lacks many main Features that other Daws like Cubase Pro and Studio One have a decades ago. Like MPE Support and ARA Support. Ontime Playlist Pitch editor like cubase pro has vari audio. I still need those main features in FL . And the Development of FL is still very Slow. But Lifetime free Updates have made me stay with FL till now as my main Daw.
i use both daws fl and studio one . I ain't gonna lie both are great in my opinion
Welp....... great video. I use both FL and Studio One. I use FL for creating patterns and Studio One for recording, mixing and mastering. They both are 100% useful to me.
Studio One Crew ! For me it’s gotta be chopping sample to Impact XT ❤just like slicing to midi for Ableton live or slicing using Edison in FL. Later Days😉
As a person who knows FL Studio for 10 years, and Studio One for 3 years and love both of them, I should say that the FL part was so weak, and he literally said nothing about the FL Studio. I mean among all the good things, you talk about the fader?! I believe you can make way better videos on this topic.
I knew he fumbled the bag when he started talking about all the most universal basic stuff in FL that all daws have. Like the controls in the piano roll, fades and the EQ lol.
Yeah, I agree. I think he should prepare himself better to show Fl Studio, since he talked nothing but the common stuff you can find in every daw on the planet, and the whole point is showing what makes it unique.
Yeah I agree. I have both and even tho I'm not all that familiar with FL Studio, I know that the piano roll and its functions are the best of any daw. Wich is HUGE for those who work with midi like I do.
I'm still learning FL, but Studio one is superior for recording and editing audio.
I also use Reaper(wich I'm most familiar with and been using longest), and for mixing its the goat. Its pretty great for audio too...but it kinda sucks for working with midi. You can do it...but it's not fun at all.
Everything he said about Fl was wrong at 7:00 you can set in settings to Detach or to open multiple channels at same times, at 7:37 you can already do That, all you have to do is drag the sample on a track playlist and select audio or instrument track, same with instrument, drag it from browser or Right click on a playlist track then Track mode > Instrument track> and select your Instrument and you pretty much have a linear workflow like S1 and other DAWS
Facts
Great info and comparison.
I'm sure each DAW choice has things unique that makes that one the best choice. Myself, I like Studio One. It's working well with what I want and need. Bottom line is choose what's best for you.
PS there's that analog couch again.
Or is it analog? 🤔 😂
Should we still do such comparisons while we all know it is all an individuals choice and preference? To me the best DAW is the one that one is most comfortably with. When it comes to this the best example I like to give is an off-topic example. I am working with Photoshop since 1999, version 5.5. when it comes to editing pictures I can still use that version and do anything that the latest 2023 version can do. Or my most comfortable DAW for beat production is still Orion 8.6.2. Even though it is no longer in production. Occasionally I do use studio one. For me when it comes to step sequencing Orion is my King. Voice recording, mixing and mastering for that I prefer Studio One since it's very first release 2009. I love to master the in and outs of a software instead of following the hype. I did of cause tried old schools like Reason, Cubase, Cakewalk, Protols, FL formally Fruity loops etc and I can work with all of the. As for the perfect DAW there is none but with Orion and Studio One I have found my musical home.
ISAGE BEATS @ 8:23 select all sounds on the channel rack the "green vertical icons to the right of each inserted sample/plugins " then go to mixer right click mixer channel 1 and select channel routing then route selected channels staring from this track in fl studio
Great video. I was personally using FL before and then I switched to Reaper and sometimes I use S1, they are all amazing DAWs. I personally think S1 is far more producer focused than Reaper and even the tools and workflows are setup very much to make producing fast and intuitive with some very innovative tools whereas Reaper really excels at mixing with very powerful routing capabilities.
But I do have some complaints for S1. I do think the design for S1 is a bit lack luster and by design I mean the fundamentals of the program and how it works. it seems like they are adding tools to compensate for a less flexible design instead of rewriting how fundamentally the program works.
For example with the cord track, in Reaper you can pretty much emulate a lot of features of the chord track without moving your audio around too much. Since in Reaper, you can have audio, midi, stereo, mono, video all in the same track, you can very easily convert audio to midi and midi to audio in Reaper and detect the chords without moving around the audio too much. But in S1, I think a better design would've if you can turn any track into a chord track by just selecting a section of an audio and then S1 shows the chords of that selected section and then quickly right click to turn it into a midi event but I suppose to be able to have feature set like that, they would have to recode and redo the core functionality of S1.
Same goes for multi-instruments in S, In Reaper you can just chain bunch of VSTi plugins in the FX chain but for that you'd need the multi-instruments in S1 but that has some dope features like being able to limit certain part of the keys to be played by one VSTi and changing pitches of each without changing the notes etc. There are also many other examples of stuff like this in S1.
I made this comment 8 months ago and after that I used S1, Ableton, FL, Bitwig, Cubase and Reason and I decided to permanently shift to Reaper while keeping Bitwig as my 2nd DAW.
Learn both! Fun video,thanks
Both of these daws I love ❤️
Studio One forever ❤
The majority will choose studio one because its simply the best
studio one best daw
6:54 - Just use the General settings - Miscellaneous - Detach all plugins, or TAB to switch the opened windows.
I use both DAWS, What I like about FL is that you can detect the tempo of any sample, you don't have to tap the tempo to find it, Studio one does have the option where it automatically tries to match it but its not accurate every time and sometimes it dosen't even work, another thing I like is that if you don;t have a midi keyboard with you, you can use pretty much use all notes on PC/laptop keyboard and also select from what note it starts, for example Q can start from C note or F note if I want to write in F minor for ex. Another thing FL is good at are the stock synths, they are a little bit more complicated to learn but more powerfull than any stock synths and they don't use that much CPU, another good plugin is the stock Frequency splitter, you can split in 3 bands and route each band to different mixer/fx, you can achieve similar in S1with Splitter but it dosen't have the Linear Phase mode and it gets more confusing after you add more plugins on each band + you have to open it everytime, the Patcher in FL is also crazy good, you can do crazy chains with instruments and FX, all in one instance, smthing similar is Bitwig grid but not quite, its different
What I like more about Studio one is the Event FX, ChordTracker/Melodyne/Layers/, a different workflow that's a little bit better in some cases, the stretching algorithm is better than FL, and the audio editing is faster, it also has a video track which Fl dosen't.
Edit: Another thing about Fl, if you load an analazyer like Voxengo SPAN or an EQ on "Current mixer" you can analyze separtely every mixer channel with just one instance of SPAN/EQ, I don't think that's possible in Studio One or mby I don't know how to do it. Another thing you can do with "Current mixer" is load any plugin like a distortion/reverb then select different channels in the mixer and see how those mixer chanels would sound if they had that distortion plugin.
In Fl you can also use any mixer as a send while in S1 you need a bus or fx, which kinda sux, not only that but in FL you can use a sender before some plugins are applied, mby you have some distortion for example but you want to send clean sound to Reverb FX.
If you enjoyed the video, would you mind leaving a like? 👍 It helps us out a ton! Thanks in advance! 😊
I really like the concept behind this video series, however, I feel that this one lacks depth and the title is somewhat misleading as it primarily compares some random nice features of S1 and FL.
I have been using Cubase for several years now and the only DAW that I regularly consider switching back to from time to time is FL. (I also really like S1 btw because it feels like a modernized version of Cubase, but it also lacks some of my favorite features from Cubase).
While I liked the way in which ISAGE BEATS presented the things he likes about FL, they really lacked substance. With regards to the piano roll alone, there is so much more to talk about. In short, the piano roll is just a joy to work with due to its ease of use and numerous great tools. Some examples of what I love about the piano roll:
- Left click: add, Right click delete (wish all DAWs had this)
- “Saves” length of last midi note
- All the great tools and how nicely they are implemented (brush, paint, cut, etc…).
- Chopper, Randomizer, Strum-Tool, Arpeggiator, riff machine
- Intelligent Duplicating (with space left at the end etc)
- Stretching, Flipping/Mirroring Midi-Notes
- The infamous glide notes (i think ableton does midi glides the best by now, but FL is second imho)
- Ghost Notes
What makes the piano roll in FL special to me is not just its list of features, but also its USABILITY.
For example, while the Piano Roll in Cubase and S1 may have many or even more features, using it is just not as enjoyable as it is in FL due to small differences that add up. For instance, Cubase has ghost notes, but they are not practical for me as clicking on one also always selects it. Or, while I can randomize MIDI in Cubase with an MIDI effect or macro, it is not as effortless and fun as within the randomizer in FL. The list goes on...
In conclusion, if I were to spend most of my time in the piano roll, I would still be using FL. However, since working with audio files in the playlist is still challenging in FL, I eventually switched to the DAW that (some years ago) had the second best piano roll, great audio editing, and excellent mixing features. To me, using Cubase is not the best of both worlds, but the best compromise for now.
If you are really interested in what makes FL Studio (21) great, I can highly recommend some Videos on Benn Jordans Channel.
Been using Cockos REAPER since it's 1st version and haven't had a reason to change yet. However, I recently got Studio One 6 Professional for free with a new interface I bought. After seeing this video might have to give it a try now since it seems to be very similar to REAPER which I love. Also those Presonus stock plugins came in very highly recommended by many of my friends as well. The only thing that has me on the fence is that this is yet another DAW that is CPU/resource heavy. It's one of the main reason I have stuck with REAPER since it's inception. There is just no reason for DAWs to be so resource heavy with modern day tech. Still will be giving it a try none the less.
Switched to Studio One years ago...no regrets.
I use FL Studio a lot but you seem to have convinced me to consider switching to Studio One.
Thank you. I use studio one artist but was considering fl studio. I make video game music so 90% of the time, i will be using midi. Having good control of the piano role would be great. plus it sucks that S1 doesn't have middle mouse panning
Both are different and i preffer 100% studio One. Isrhe best DAW😊
personally i never got the fl studio ui then i got used to garage band which which helped me swich to logic and now m switching to studio 1⃣ which is easy and similar to use but has way more relevent fetures❤
after using FL studio for over 10years, i made the change to studio one 6 and im very impressed. studio one is all round better, the new stock plug ins blow all the FL studio ones out the park, if your someone who uses alot of analog hardware and plays live, studio one is the one for you. FL is amazing also but way more user friendly for a someone starting out. it also crashes alot, persoanlly if you want to produce more like a pro out the box i would steer clear of FL studio. but for a bedroom producer its great.
hi Isage Beats,i own fl studio and studio one,for me,each DAW is optimised for different music genre's,fl studio for making beats,studio one for making orchestral scores,btw, fl studio is not a linear DAW,so like you've mentioned you can place everything averywhere
and you're right,if you have a big template you will get confused as to where everything is,however there's a minimallistic solution
when you right click on a track you can enable "lock to content" so this instrument cant be moved to another track
bummer is that you'll have to do this with all new instrument tracks,there is no global lock to content for all tracks pfff 😁
maybe something to ask the good people at image line to include that in a next update,cheers mate
"btw, fl studio is not a linear DAW,so like you've mentioned you can place everything averywhere and you're right,if you have a big template you will get confused as to where everything"
That's wrong, you can use FL as a linear DAW but beatmakers don't know about it lol, instead of adding instrument from channel rack you can drag it from browser into a Track playlist, or you can right click on a Track playlist Track mode > Instrument track > and select your instrument, that way it automatically routes it to a mixer/auto names it, every automation you do for that sound will automatically be grouped, its basically same workflow as a Linear daw. And you do same with samples, instead of putting them in channel rack or randomly in playlist you put them on a Track Playlist and select audio track if you want waveform or Insturment track if you want to make it in a midi pattern.
@@stizan9185oh so it's not a linear DAW.🤦
I just started studio one. I been trying to make Memphis phonk beats, but, it seems as though it's easier to make those beats in FL Studio.
I am three minutes in and so far we have talked about piano rolls. When does the Fl Studio Studio One comparison start?
Dude! I'm new to FL Studio and that comment about playlist not automatically matching up with a track number on the mixer drives me nuts. Tony Thomas in comment below says that it happens automatically when you drop an instrument into a playlist track but I'm NOT seeing that. I do have the latest FL Studio version and it seems like you have to recreate what's on the playlist again on the mixer.
You can link those tracks manually but would be nice if the tracks were already linked
I have both Daws so I'm good!
if you used to use Logic or Cubase you are already familiar with Studio One they are very similar to each other
In my own opinion I wouldn't use anything but studio one. I have been with it since it premiered at the tape op convention in sxsw forever ago.... I'm a presonus fan period! Their tube pres armed with an assortment of tubes are my all time favorite... upgrade the tube and it competes with any others and often tops higend preamps..
I appreciate your channel homie. Your efforts and manor of delivery.
Beats listening to all the arrogant pekerheds who deliver in their typical cocky influencer methods or whatever their true objectives are... most offer nothin more than "hey look at me, I know what you don't" haha..
Good shiit bro...
Ayyyy thank you. I don’t know everything. I’m not trying to help everyone. I do know one thing. Studio One and how to make music with it 😂 and I just share it here. Thank you again.
@@ProducingInTheBox you alright dude.. I like that I can see a sense of courtesy and respect in you man.. shits getting rare bro.. for real...
I've never had that routing issue with S1 so I am confused why you to. All my tracks are always automatically assigned and routed properly until I change them making buses or VCAs etc. (Not a full S1 user. Ableton Gang all day. I use it mainly for recording and sometimes mixing)
I have both & they are both awesome in thier own ways. If S1 had a better piano roll that was more like FL...look the f out it'd be the 🐐! I would love to see better integration with Maschine...in all the daws.
Also, S1 gives me a lot of grief while I'm trying to work in the timeline. Locating and staying located on a specific area of a track is a pain. Does anyone else have this problem? I'm used to and have more experience with Reaper, and it's just way easier to work the timeline.
Just set a time loop at the location and there are many other ways to do this within Studio One. And since version 6.5 it now has Dolby Atmos,' for those of you who are interested. I actually don't know of many DAWs that actually do have it.
How do you assign an insument to a specific channel? Im having the same problem you mentioned in where I cant hear what I'm playing. Great video btw!
No se pueden comparar. FL está diseñado para niños y amateurs y Studio One para productores profesionales. Yo uso FL.
S1 still King. FL missing some key basics and way too much clicking to get simple things done. #S1Gang
In fl studio, in the arrangement area, you know, we can arrange a kick as a wav track with one click, and then we can delete the wav we put with one click again by clicking on it. can you do the same feature in studio one?
Curiosly the parametric Eq is less transparent Parametric Eq of Any Stock DAW xD. Some Engeniers know when something comes from FL when they mix it with this plugin XD
FL studio is a complete Musicians Software, but Studio One has more hand in Audio Recording/Editing/Mastering and Video production. (from my experience)
Maybe you know how to make same size of notes for all tracks in S1. Every time when I open midi editor I need to adjust size of notes)) I hate this in S1))
FL is not in a conversation, special for the 3 most important thinks for producers, mixing, mastering and production!
1) Ableton Live
2) Protools
3) Cubase
4) Studio One
5)Logic Pro
6) Fl
7) Garage Band
Hey bro where did you get that macro from Ivan ? Mind sharing the link ?
🔥🔥
Just re-download studio one from watching this video now it's #FLSTUDIOONEGANG 💪🏾💯🔥
FL is so popular, FL Gang are so proud of it
Friend, I need your help. Do you know how I can duplicate midi notes to the left instead of right in studio one? Because if I click on the D key, it duplicates the midi notes only to the right on the piano roll.
User preference i guess. Started with Logic, tried FL and didn't care for it. Went to Cubase and used that DAW for several years until i tried Studio one. Studio one is now my preference for the past couple of years.
Cubase is one of my favorites. If I wasn’t using Studio One, I’d be using Cubase
I am confused because FL Studio is weird because it doesn’t select and create notes the same way other DAW’s work!
It does thing’s differently which is not intuitive to those who have used other DAW’s prior to using FL Studio!
I don’t enjoy the FL Studio Workflow I haven’t got use to it yet maybe I will feel differently when it clicks with me!
But it seems to have a completely different workflow that is confusing to start with but if I started with this workflow it would probably be easier!
But coming from other DAW’s it makes no sense to begin with & feels alien but those who started in FL Studio will say it is the most intuitive!
But I started in Cubase Years ago then Logic Pro to Ableton Live going back to Cubase just have to relearn that Program again because it’s been so long!
Studio One is good but need to learn it as well! Ableton Live is the Most easiest once it clicks because to start with it is confusing too because it looks totally different to other DAW’s like FL STUDIO is totally different from other DAW’s once it clicks then the appreciation comes into effect until then they are confusing!
is there a "dump score" option in studio one and how to get to it?
What's version includes the chord/audio to MIDI function? the v5 ?
Yes! V5 has this feature
@@ProducingInTheBoxat 10:56 you show how the audio recognizes and converts it to chords but I have tried and no chords appear, what am I missing? It doesn't work for me, do you know what it could be?
so, which one would you recommend to a beginner?
Studio One 6.5
It takes me 1 month to create in cubase and 1 days in fl studio. BTW studio one is the best for mastering
For me, Fl Studio is the best :>
I'm sorry but you picked the wrong user to represent FL Studio, imho atleast.
FL have extremely complex and creative features that most of those 'beatmakers' don't know about.
Anddd parametric EQ2 is sooo out of date, nowhere near to other DAWs main stock EQ. No M/S or seperate L/R feature, no dynamic EQing feature etc. FL shines with its stock instrument plugins, like FLEX for example.
The updated playlist also gives you an option to lay down your tracks in a more traditional way now.
Some complex/advanced routing can also be extremely helpful while doing hybrid mixing.
FL all day
I agree with the loveable features.
I agree with the 1st dislike, but the rest, I ain't got no problem
You really needed to compare apples to apples. The midi section and piano roll is very powerful and can do most of FL studios piano roll plus a few things easier to do against fl.
FL piano roll is so much better than Studio ones. Studio ones is the worst I have used honestly
@@danielpassmore5026 Let me guess . Youve been on a cracked version of FL and never took the time to learn many other piano rolls on different DAWS .. LOL. s1 paino roll is very VERY capable dude .
Nice hair Cut
Ayyyyyyy thanks for noticing
I *strongly* prefer Studio One over FL Studio, especially because of the general workflow. My main issue is with its stability and bugginess. I don't know how it is for FL Studio, but S1 just crashes way too often for me. And yes, I know it's usually the plugin's fault, but at the end of the day, I don't care who it was. My session crashed, my flow is ruined and that's what counts. I wish they had sandboxing for third party plugins. Also, the internal routing becomes buggy regularly, with pretty much the same effect. If it weren't for those two issues, S1 would remain my favorite DAW.
But lately, I find myself using Bitwig more and more, even though I find S1 more capable and better workflow wise. For example, I miss the whole arranger track functionality soooo much! That's maybe my favorite thing about S1. How they solved a ton of workflow issues with consistent concepts. And the arranger track in specific (but also the other ones). The lyrics track is brilliant imho.
Is studio one free. Is there a trial
@@arkimwilliamson4429 there is a free version! It’s called Studio One Prime
Почему никто не говорит про действительно плохую сторону fl studio? У кого не спрошу, у всех она плохо дружит с vst плагинами, то должно грузит, то процессор нагружает, одним словом : плохо оптимизирована. Я очень люблю fl , но из-за плохой оптимизации иногда не возможно работать. В s1 все плагины и банки контакта грузятся очень быстро, буквально 1-2 секунды, сколько плагинов не включай - все работает ровно и быстро, чего до сих пор нет в fl. Зато fade in fade out на сэмплы на дорожке добавили!😂😂😂
Буду разбираться в первой студии, потом может окончательно перейду на неё.
studio one 5 to 6 was not a big update. The Midi could be better in Studio One.
Same im a mainly fl user tried ableton and didnt like it
No comparison, S1 is superior, primarily the workflow just allows me to flow.
After using FL for 15 years I can confirm FL is often confusing to use . Studio one is more intuitive
I just bought S1. Been using FL, but S1 has better MIDI and can separate drum kit MIDI's.
10 mins of FL nonsense and 5 mins of Studio One greatness.
Studio one better
The Studio One emulations aren't that great IMO. Enough to get started though.
I use both Daws so no comments
it is cubase 2
Let's begin
FL studio
Painting tool while making or arranging your patterns is the most unique, used feature for FL studio
Cooking your arrangements as easy as that
Patcher is the ultimate. Holy grail
Stock plugins default preset is almist the most lovely of all DAW'S
Midi-out as a plugin is a killer feature
Keeping a tasty one for itself like
Soundgoodizer
Just through it on, it will sound good!
The best customized ASIO Driver even better than the original universal one itself!
Saved me a lot, still
The fastest ever to open
The best DAW to rewire with studio one even better than Abelton live
Badzzz:-
Where is where , routingzzzz
Intimidating even still after a while
Its work flow still baaaad like avid
Studio one
My sweet heart one
The ever best friendly looking one
The best in work flow
Macro feature
ARA, melodyne communication is wow
Drag, drop everything, presets
Chord track
Multi instruments in a single track
Splitter as a plugin is the killing feature for studio one
Key shortcuts, but for easier workflow you need to make more of your own the way you like
Badzzz:-
Bad in its own company instrument support! Just those instruments only?! Look at Reason, Abelton, Fl studio
Please make more of your own
Almost all of us has jumped to another do just for a plugin or instrument there!
The best of all time is Reason
The most ever generous ones to make all their effects, instruments as a plugin for other Daw's
That helped the heck me a lot
Ofcourse Abelton live M4L comunity is galaxy in itself but MACRO feature in studio one opened a new level even it's still way behind
Logic pro sampler, Abelton Simpler is much above both DAW'S sampler
Abelton has 2 views built-in, ready for you is a good feature this will help more FL studio but still good addition to studio one
No Midi-out in instrument track in studio one is a shame
No customized ASIO Driver for studio one
Buit in presets for its instruments is not that good , you need to buy a better ones or become a sound designer, make yours
No updates for its sampler for years especially the start, end markers of the loop range automation feature
, graining, binding a built-in LFO to its knobs
Fl more better..very easy for design sound.. in s1 we havn't more modulate tool
i feel like a yo yo cus i wont leave pro tools for s1
People use FL because it's cheaper. FL is a pain in the ass compared to Studio One. S1 is light years ahead of FL when it comes to ease of use. I was using FL since 4. To this day with ver. 21 picking plugins and setting up instruments is still a visual mess and just plain SUCKS. FL STILL to this day can't size plugins right. The FL mixer is still the most illogical thing I've come across. Image Line needs to take lessons from Presonus on how things should be set up and they might survive. - S1 is so organized and simple drag and drop and your ready to go instantly with just about everything. No thought required and the damn plugins fantastically organized, are sized properly and easy to see. I'll never use FL again. S1 is way worth the price.
Very bad experience with studio one. Always faced high cpu usage even using stock plugins.
It could not be able to play their demo project without crackling sound.
thats bizarre, there must be something with your computerspecs
Go cubase
The only time i had a cpu problem with S1 was using very cpu hungry plugin in a slow cpu PC ( 1.7 GHz). Once I switched to a normal cpu (2.5 GHz) the same plugin run's ok. Other perfomance problems were solved once I learned how to configure basic parameters like the buffer size. Today My only concern is with memory cause i have only 8 GB.
You need to check your settings, the settings has alot to do with cpu usage, recording settings has to be different from mixing settings
I bothered to watch this video cause I was curious to hear what he has to say bout FL Studio. In Studio One you can do preaty much the same in the piano roll as in FL, in many cases much easier. The stuck plugins in Studio One are way much advanced. The parametric EQ in FL is one million light-years far away to be something like the Pro EQ3 in S1.
Fl stock plugins are better then studio one, that where studio one lacks, stock stuff, but if studio one team up with some plugins company imagine... haha...fabfilter or something like that :P
Cuantos tragos tomaste antes de escribir eso😅?!! Me has hecho reir man. Ta bueno el chiste ese😂😂😂😅😅!!
@@grandrmusic4691 dj aligator from peru lima
I'm a s1 user
FL is for beat makers. Studio One Pro is for producers that actually play keys. A beat maker is not a producer.
I love S1, because it's cheap.
idk man for me Fl studio all Plugin edition
still fl studio is the best dont mind that drunk man saying about the plugin minimizing its a normal way