Lucid Air Pure AWD - Real World Range Test - 2023

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 28 ก.ค. 2023
  • Real world range test for the Lucid Air Pure All Wheel Drive (AWD). Using real world conditions, hot weather, stops, overnight stay, climate control, and Texas speeds!
    Use my referral link to buy a Lucid and get up to $1,250 vehicle discount or rebate. This was provided to me as a Lucid owner.
    lucidmotors.com/configure?ref...
  • ยานยนต์และพาหนะ

ความคิดเห็น • 103

  • @CookandBakewithSamer
    @CookandBakewithSamer 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Thank you for sharing real world driving range. Definitely the 75 MPH and the overnight played a good role in reducing the range. It was hot too. Also, good start on the subscriptions. I’ve recently started a cooking channel. Thinking to add some life experiences with my current GLC since I enjoy cars and cooking. Keep up the good work. Looking forward to more reports.

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Thanks for watching! Cooking with Cars!!! Sounds like you already have the perfect theme for a new channel! It has been fun doing these! Always something to learn along the way!

    • @CookandBakewithSamer
      @CookandBakewithSamer 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@EV-365 Definitely. Always learning new things. Thank you as well.

  • @abhisheksitar
    @abhisheksitar 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Great videos! I have been watching many of yours as I am planning on getting a Pure dual motor

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  4 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Thanks for watching!!! It really was a great car. The drive was fantastic!

  • @aaronsenechal2307
    @aaronsenechal2307 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    EPA range is a mix of highway and city driving. No car will obtain the EPA estimate range with highway speeds.

    • @Jojo-yz4we
      @Jojo-yz4we 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      But considering outside temperature of 100 degrees and full AC. 330 miles is incredible compared to the 410 listed, and you have to remember the 410 is rwd and this car is awd and obviously not as erficient

  • @srt4baby24
    @srt4baby24 6 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Its been noted by multiple owners that the car's range gets even better over time. Would love to see an update at 1000 miles and 5k

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Interesting! I am at about 800. I may just have to make that video!

  • @DoomSlayer-ow4jq
    @DoomSlayer-ow4jq 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Hello from Dallas, TX.

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thanks for checking in!!!

  • @davidbattaglia2336
    @davidbattaglia2336 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I would love to point out a few things. Lucid uses the EPA 5 cycle test (as do Tesla, Audi, Polestar, and Rivian). Historically, this gives higher EPA numbers that most people won't be able to obtain. I think Lucid went with this test for marketing reasons. Tesla used it and could "advertise" their vehicles having 400 miles range. My opinion - Lucid wanted to show it was a better ranged vehicle than Tesla, so it used the same 5 cycle test so that Tesla wouldn't have an unfair advantage when it came to EPA reported range.
    Anyhow, given the 5 cycle test......most would not hit the target EPA range.
    Second, and as pointed out by others - speed kills efficiency. Driving at 83 mph (your reported avg speed from below) and getting 3.5 - 3.6 miles per kwh is fantastic! If you were to have slowed down to 55, your efficiency would have improved by ~30% (google search shows 55 vs 80 mph is a 28% decrease in fuel efficiency). Thus 3.6 miles/kwh would have improved to 4.7 miles/kwh which is right about where the EPA would have you.
    Would you want to drive 55 mph? Highly likely not and that's TOTALLY fine. It's just managing expectations as to what the car CAN do vs what it DOES do based on driving speeds, styles, environmental conditions (wind, temperature, elevation changes, etc).
    Thanks for posting up your video!

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Great detailed information! Thanks for sharing!!!

  • @Miata822
    @Miata822 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Good video. I hope to see more from you.
    It is important to realize that EPA range numbers are a blend of hypothetical city and highway driving (highway at 70mph). In my Air GT I have a lifetime average of 3.2 m/kWhr based on mostly Texas freeway miles at between 80-90mph. Speed really crushes range but the Lucid's aerodynamic efficiency makes that less painful than in other cars.
    Lucid, at least with the big batteries, allows you to use almost all of the capacity. It is not advisable to push the limit either to the top or bottom, but at least 100% and 0% mean exactly what they say on the display. I appreciate Lucid treating us like adults and letting us make our own choices.
    It would be interesting to see how quickly the Pure adds charge. I would imagine that your charging stop in (Hillsboro?) only took about 15 minutes to get what you needed to get home. Let us know.

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You nailed it with everything you said! Yes, the Hillsboro charge was about 15-20 minutes and that because we spent a little more time in the Wal-mart buying some dipping dots! The charger didn't quite give us it's full charging speed, but was still more than enough! I put out a charging curve video that goes into a little more detail on the charging! Thanks for watching!

    • @sujaynis3905
      @sujaynis3905 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      We met in one video and had confronting views

  • @zuodi3613
    @zuodi3613 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    Great testing video! Maybe Lucid Air fits the driving mode in East-Asia area like Japan, Taiwan etc. We usually not drive over 40miles expect the weekends and it might be easy to get consumption >4.0miles/kWh.

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      At 40 miles a day, you all will have a lot of great EV options, especially if you have home/work charging! Even our MINI would be great for that! Thanks for watching!!!

    • @zuodi3613
      @zuodi3613 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@EV-365 Thank you for your advice and I am sorry I wrote the wrong info in last time. It should be 40miles/hr, not 40miles a day so that’s why I expect it could achieve >4.0miles/kWh in here. Any way I will keep waiting the day that A-GT comes to Taiwan😁.

  • @cyco1978
    @cyco1978 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    Dam that was pretty dam good, to bad they’re just lowing the price i would of probably gotten it over the R1T, well to late now love my truck

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Looks like we have the same tastes! I looooove the R1T. The Lucid has been great, but I'll be driving the R1T for a long time. Lucid of course is much better with efficiency, but the Rivian just checks so many other boxes that most EV's out there at the moment can't!

  • @BrianCorish
    @BrianCorish 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Hi what size wheels were you on? trying to figure out whether I can get away with a Pure or a Grand Touring!

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      We have the 19" Aero Wheels. Let me know if you have any other questions! Check our detailed walk around video for more info on our spec. th-cam.com/video/BSufhwewPKo/w-d-xo.htmlsi=YHixXnYZE_PgekvN

    • @BrianCorish
      @BrianCorish 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thank you!@@EV-365

  • @terrytexas8257
    @terrytexas8257 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    I may have the service techs check my system on my Air GT, it seems to loose about 6 miles a night even in sleep mode...Considering it has two 12v batteries, it shouldn't lose power from the drive batteries while maintaining systems.

    • @USNEM
      @USNEM 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Maybe your phone keeps triggering it if it's close to you

    • @terrytexas8257
      @terrytexas8257 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@USNEMNope...my office is right next to my garage, so I turned that feature off.

    • @Miata822
      @Miata822 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The "miles" number is a calculated figure based on who-knows-what. Check to see it the charge % changes.

    • @terrytexas8257
      @terrytexas8257 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@Miata822 I have already reported the issue. Since the car has two 12v batteries for everything other than the drive batteries, then the car should be pulling from those batteries instead of the drive battery. The 2012 Leaf I had was charged via solar panel on the back of the car to maintain systems completely seperate from the Drive battery. Now I can see it pulling from the drive battery "if and when it needs it", but to pull from it right after a charge makes not sense. IMO there is some odd BMS programming happening with their system.

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      6% seems excessive, especially with the phone wake off. 0% also surprised me on my overnight. Not sure how I got that. I would imagine somewhere in the middle is more reasonable.

  • @Drbeto209
    @Drbeto209 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    Also having more people in the car drains the battery faster

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  10 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      Yup! That and luggage! Though we did pack light for one night. I think this was a good worst case range test with all the factors, particularly that July heat and Texas speeds!

    • @Drbeto209
      @Drbeto209 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

      @@EV-365 Yup that’s the bad thing about EV’s. Driving 64 mph helps with the range but it sucks if you like to speed which I do :(.

    • @faithosadebe5293
      @faithosadebe5293 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Well, the car is design to carry folks and luggage.. Not you carrying the car

    • @cbatiau2528
      @cbatiau2528 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      But that’s a more realistic range test for road trips … then there’s the range test for local stop-and-go local commuting with only the driver … both range figures are important to know

    • @ExclamationMarx
      @ExclamationMarx 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@Drbeto209To be fair driving slower helps with the range of any car whether it's using electric motors or a piston engine

  • @ericladror14
    @ericladror14 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    You do not condition the battery for a drive, you condition it for a fast charge.. conditioning the battery drains a lot of range, but allows for a faster charge.
    Lucid's estimated range is based on the unrealistic EPA estimate, not on your actual mileage. And yes, it's not very smart.😢

  • @mikeovanes
    @mikeovanes 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

    how much does the distance drop as the speed goes to 100 mph? does it drop to half total range 200 miles? thank you...

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  7 หลายเดือนก่อน

      I am not sure exactly, but every 10 miles over 70, in any EV, drops that range down. I averaged about 83 mph on this drive.

    • @michaelhopwood1179
      @michaelhopwood1179 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@EV-365wow - 83 is hauling on a range test with 3.6. nice job

  • @srqcrna
    @srqcrna 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What’s the speed of charge on a Tesla Supercharger?

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Most of the Tesla units should be able to give you up to 250 kw. Was not able to take the Lucid to one, but did take the Rivian to one with a Magic Dock and it was not coming close to the 220 kw the Rivian was capable. Tesla Charging units are typically more reliable, but even they do not seem to always perform their best.

  • @samikamal1
    @samikamal1 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    LET'S GOOOOOOOOOO LUCID✨️ FAMILY 🙋‍♂️❤️🥳🥳🥳🥳🎉🎉🎉🕺🕺🕺😁👍KEEP ADDING ON TO YOUR POSITIONS EVERYONE STAY FOCUSED AND DISCIPLINE HARD WORK DEDICATION TOGETHER AS ONE LUCID FAMILY. GOONIES NEVER SAY DIE!🙋‍♂️✌️😉👍

    • @BioniqBob
      @BioniqBob 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      No coffee for you

    • @samikamal1
      @samikamal1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@BioniqBob 😁😉👍👏👏🙋‍♂️❤️🥳🥳🥳LET'S GOOOOOOOOOO BOBBYBEAR TOGETHER AS ONE LUCID✨️ FAMILY ❤️

    • @BioniqBob
      @BioniqBob 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@samikamal1 Stop huffing gas fumes.

    • @samikamal1
      @samikamal1 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@BioniqBob PATIENCE IS KEY BOBBY

    • @BioniqBob
      @BioniqBob 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@samikamal1 I must say you are loud if nothing else.

  • @KyleHubb
    @KyleHubb 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    The Pure is a 92 kWh pack.

  • @niradgupta4075
    @niradgupta4075 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    100 degrees makes a huge difference. Could be ~20% loss.

    • @zlonewolf
      @zlonewolf 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      100 degrees is normal that Tesla can achieve normal and losing 0% loss. Sounds like Lucid is full of "lucid air".

    • @Miata822
      @Miata822 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Not that much loss in a Lucid. Some years ago in my 2011 LEAF that was true, but not today. Arctic weather is another story.

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The heat definitely makes a difference, but the bigger indirect impact of the heat is more so because the AC is cranking. Also, every little bit over 70 mph is the real drain!

  • @djrednitro4116
    @djrednitro4116 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    problem with EV is that the range is not linear. If you drive slowly a distance of 30 miles you will be using way less battery that if you drive the same distance of 30 miles super fast

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes, that is definitely the case. I would imagine, ICE vehicles are the same if you have a heavy foot. Perhaps not as drastic though!

  • @esotericlifestyle5548
    @esotericlifestyle5548 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    average speed 83mph?

    • @Miata822
      @Miata822 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Texas, Baby. He was going slow 😉

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Ha! So true. People were passing me up!

  • @StealthAZ
    @StealthAZ 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I have to wrap my head around waiting 20 to 30 minutes stopping to charge and not be in/out for gas. Could make road trips extra long

    • @Miata822
      @Miata822 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Not as much as you think. Notice he didn't need to stop on the way to Dallas. The Lucid's 900V battery charges very quickly on a CCS charger. When I drive from Dallas to Little Rock regularly I stop to charge in Hope Arkansas. Not because I need the charge, but for a restroom break and maybe to grab lunch. 15 minutes every 2-3 hours is not an issue.

    • @BioniqBob
      @BioniqBob 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Maybe with less gas fumes you could.

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It is definitely a different way to think about fueling your car. The key thing here, is it will only be on longer road trips. You save so much time day to day by being able to charge from home and never having to go to a gas station for daily purposes. That more than makes up for the occasional road trip time loss. Even on road trips, it kind of is nice to stop, take a break, meet some people, and get back on the road refreshed (the girls got dipping dots on this stop). From Austin, I can get to San Antonio (round trip), Houston, and Dallas all on single charge. If I were not filming the video, I would have charged at the place I stayed because they have charging, or went to a fast charger in the morning while the fam was getting ready, and would not have to have made that stop. It really is not bad!

    • @BioniqBob
      @BioniqBob 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@EV-365 You can tell the naysayers that have never driven an EV.

  • @BioniqBob
    @BioniqBob 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    3 Weeks and 133 Thumbs up. Next.

  • @klediluzha2869
    @klediluzha2869 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

    “Y’all” that was enough to only stop this video at 5 seconds. Have a great day

  • @mikeggg1979
    @mikeggg1979 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    EV’a are cool but gas is better. These things are hard to charge, you can find a gas station everywhere you can’t find a charging station. How long does a charge take?

    • @Cruor34
      @Cruor34 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It depends on what you do and your situation. I would never have considered an EV even 3 years ago, but I moved to CA for my job. There are charging stations everywhere, and free charging at my apartment complex. Work round trip is about 30 miles, so I can just charge at the end of the day. Now if you are in say, Arkansas (my last job site) and travel a lot, then yes, an EV would suck. In a nutshell I'd say if you live in a place you don't need to drive a lot and has EV charging, an EV is awesome, saves money and is insanely quick. If you drive a lot and do long distances, then yes stay gas, we aren't there yet. As for charging, the free apt charger gives about 7-8%/hour to my Tesla Model 3 Performance. That sounds crappy but remember, 2-3 hours charges my days travels, and I'm in my apt playing computer games or watching movies or cooking, stuff I'd do anyway. A Tesla Superchager will take me from 20-80 in about 30 minutes.

    • @dclassics831
      @dclassics831 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      It’s extremely easy to charge and charging stations are everywhere. You never notice it until you have an ev. This is coming from someone with two Teslas. Charging at home will get me a full charge overnight and if I do go to a supercharge station from let’s say 10% to 80% will take roughly 20 min. Enough time to use the bathroom, get something to drink, bite to eat, or just watch an episode of something in the car.

    • @Miata822
      @Miata822 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I guess if you like slow cars and don't mind going to gas stations, well, good for you.

    • @BioniqBob
      @BioniqBob 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Enjoy our forests!

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      It is definitely a different way to think about fueling your car. The key thing here, is it will only be on longer road trips. You save so much time day to day by being able to charge from home and never having to go to a gas station for daily purposes. That more than makes up for the occasional road trip time loss. Even on road trips, it kind of is nice to stop, take a break, meet some people, and get back on the road refreshed (the girls got dipping dots on this stop). From Austin, I can get to San Antonio (round trip), Houston, and Dallas all on single charge. If I were not filming the video, I would have charged at the place I stayed because they have charging, or went to a fast charger in the morning while the fam was getting ready, and would not have to have made that stop. It really is not bad!

  • @nordlandak6853
    @nordlandak6853 6 หลายเดือนก่อน

    If u drive like a normal human then your range will suck. On top of that if you ask the car to do car stuff like run ac it will suck

  • @MAGApepe
    @MAGApepe 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    nice,, ya no car meets the range they post on paper,,, its all just bs to sell cars lol

  • @dc_model3
    @dc_model3 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    The primary factors that affected your range is the AC running full blast and avg speed if 75+, those 2 factors alone negatively affected u

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      100%!!! Especially those Texas speeds!

    • @getawaydreamer2724
      @getawaydreamer2724 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Thats normal driving

  • @faithosadebe5293
    @faithosadebe5293 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

    With this silly range.. They are asking for Exorbitant price.. ($80k).. If am not for this pure, the RWD

    • @Cruor34
      @Cruor34 10 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      I agree LUCID is overpriced but to most people the range doesn't matter. All I do is go to work and back or maybe to the next town over for a restaurant we don't have here. If you are a long commuter then yes, all EVs suck but to a normal person who doesn't road trip all the time 200 miles of range is more than enough. I do like 50 miles a day max, that's work and back and driving into a town and back for my lunch break. Then I can charge when I get home.

    • @zlonewolf
      @zlonewolf 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@user-number-the-one Tesla S can do 400 miles and go over 100 miles/hour

    • @ExclamationMarx
      @ExclamationMarx 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      I've seen a Model S Plaid range test that only did 300 miles & that's a much more expensive car. So it's still pretty alright value

    • @EV-365
      @EV-365  8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      100%. 200-250 miles of range is the sweet spot and hopefully people will understand that will meet almost all of their use cases other than the occasional long road trip. And if you have home charging, it is such a time, money, and hassle saver. Also at that range, less batteries are being used up, the weight of the vehicle is less, efficiency goes up, price goes down.

    • @davidbattaglia2336
      @davidbattaglia2336 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Would you also say paying $80k, for a Ford F-150 Limited is exorbitant? How about $80K for a Mercedes Benz? BMW? Jaguar? Porsche?
      Lucid is marketing themselves as a Luxury Car....a competitor to Mercedes Benz. The reality is that they have to compete with the elephant in the room (Tesla) too.
      So what can they offer better than a Tesla Model S (the obvious comparison car). Both Tesla (model S long range) and Lucid (air) offer a vehicle with 400 miles range, at similar costs. Tesla offers a supercharger network. Lucid offers a more high scale interior (design and materials) and much better fit/finish (Tesla is notoriously horrible for this). So, you have to choose between the supercharger network (best for road trips and inability to charge at home) vs a much nicer cabin to live in while driving.
      As far as Mercedes, they are offering similar luxury interiors, but improved range and a lower cost.