AI vs art: Can the machine be creative? | Ahmed Elgammal | TEDxBratislava
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 1 พ.ย. 2018
- Ahmed will present to us the algorithm that can define the creativity level in art works. As well, he will also try to answer the question whether AI can replace the artist in the future.
Ahmed nám predstaví algoritmus, ktorý dokáže určiť mieru kreativity v umeleckých dielach. Taktiež sa pokúsi zodpovedať otázku, či môže v budúcnosti umelá inteligencia nahradiť umelca. Dr. Ahmed Elgammal is a professor at the Department of Computer Science and Executive Council Faculty at the Center for Cognitive Science at Rutgers University. He is the founder and director of the Art and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory at Rutgers. Dr. Elgammal is also the founder and CEO of Artrendex, a startup that builds innovative AI technology for the creative domain. Prof. Elgammal published over 160 peer-reviewed papers, book chapters, and books in the fields of computer vision, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. His research on knowledge discovery in art history and AI art generation, received wide international media attention, including reports on the Washington Post, New York Times, NBC News, the Daily Telegraph, Science News, New Scientist, and many others. In 2017, an Artsy editorial acclaimed his work on AI generated art as “the biggest artistic achievement of the year”. In 2016, a TV segment about his research, produced for PBS, has won an Emmy award. He received the National Science Foundation CAREER Award in 2006. Dr. Elgammal received his M.Sc. and Ph.D. degrees in computer science from the University of Maryland, College Park, in 2000 and 2002, respectively.
Dr. Ahmed Elgammal je profesorom na Katedre informatiky a fakulte Výkonnej rady v Centre pre kognitívne vedy na Rutgers University. Je zakladateľom a riaditeľom laboratória pre umenie a umelú inteligenciu na univerzite Rutgers. Dr. Elgammal je zakladateľom a súčasne generálnym riaditeľom spoločnosti Artrendex, čo je start-up, ktorý vytvára inovatívnu technológiu AI pre kreatívnu oblasť. Profesor Elgammal publikoval viac ako 160 recenzovaných článkov, kapitol kníh a samotné knihy v oblastiach počítačového videnia, učenia strojov a umelej inteligencie. Jeho výskum o objavovaní vedomostí v dejinách umenia a generoví umenia umelou inteligenciou získal širokú pozornosť medzinárodných médií vrátane Washington Post, New York Times, NBC News, Daily Telegraph, Science News, New Scientist a mnohých ďalších. V roku 2017 deklarovalo vydavateľstvo Artsy jeho prácu o dielach generovaných umelou inteligenciou ako “najväčší umelecký úspech roka”. V roku 2016 získal televízny segment o jeho výskume, produkovaný pre PBS, ocenenie Emmy. V roku 2006 získal Cenu National Science Foundation CAREER. Dr Elgammal získal titul M.Sc. a Ph.D. stupňa v informatike z University of Maryland, College Park, v roku 2000 a 2002, v uvedenom poradí. This talk was given at a TEDx event using the TED conference format but independently organized by a local community. Learn more at www.ted.com/tedx
![[TH] VCT Masters Shanghai Playoffs DAY 6 // G2 vs GEN | 100T vs TH](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/M6jxF80AajI/mqdefault.jpg)
Creativity includes originality and influence. New inventions have a great influence on future. Moreover, it’s important to be innovative , but not too innovative. Machines try to emulate art and they break styles. Their works are very interesting, because robots mix warm colors with cold and so on. All in all , machines can create new amazing works of art.
Nataly Kolosova Well, you’ve got a point, but, do you really think that computers can supplant human’s brain? Personally, I think, even in the future it will not happen.
All art must have originality and influence. In their research, they forced machines to create works based on world paintings created by man. Mashies combined works of several styles together, but it was still very similar. During the experiment it turned out that the machine can calculate how much this work was creative and how the population would react to it in other years.
Well, I have to say that it's quite interesting and I think that reseachers will succeed and the computer will be improved
Julia Kuryanova
Well, you’ve got a good point here, but I think that art should only be created by a human. Each person has their own unique thing that cannot be the same as others. I personally think we should get rid of these computers. They shouldn’t decide what is creative and what is not.
Yes , but on the other hand computers surpass the possibilities and replace the human brain
The speaker tells us about how the creativity,that includes originality and influence, establishes between people and the machine. Machine can create some art on base of some pieces of art,that people have ever created. By this way the machine makes a novel art,which is different from the works of humans. So,basically.machine can create,but only with human’s help.
As I see it, you are absolutely right. But on the other hand, computers develop extremely fast and people can't control it sometimes. So, in the nearest future they will be able to create their own works of art
@@user-ou8xx2lv9nhi on what grounds do you think that people can’t control the machine in the future?
But people want to create art because creating art gives them joy. What is the sense of having someone else take away the activity that gives you joy in life? Doing art gives people rewards, pleasure. It is not a job. You play the piano and what you feel cannot be described. Emotions that you feel.
Yes
What problem they are solving
Machines can be creative, there are a lot of reasons why. First of all, what is the creativity? It's about something new, that hadn't done before. And now it's available for AI to create that by analysing other artists' works. Machines can invent something opposite, and of course it will be creative, because it's different from all that you have seen before.
Well, you've got a point, but i think that artificial creativity will never match the one of a human's. From my point of view, AI doesn't really come up with new ideas, it generates them from something that already exists. As i see it, AI still need a lot of time to advance to a level of imagination that we have.
Ankh You were wrong and AI just made a breakthrough in that field....after 10 months before u commented
@@ksr3535 I am writing a paper on this matter. Could you tell me more about this breakthrough? Would be very interesting to know. Thanks.
@@TK-hw3bc I wouldn’t be a good choice in explaining the breakthrough..but I would suggest you to watch Two Minute papers channel who talks about everything related to AI or like that. Two Minute papers is a YT channel...You can check him out!
@@ksr3535 I will do that. Thanks a lot :)
Terrible description of creativity. It says nothing of utility, transformation of society through usefulness, or truth and beauty. As a painter it’s difficult to listen to people compare Andy Warhol to Leonardo da Vinci or Picasso to Caravaggio. Classical art isn’t simply a style, it’s a fundamentally different conception of man. Classical art does not view beauty and truth as independent of each other, but rather as that which is the illumination of what is true. It if you don’t believe in epistemological truth, apart from mathematics you will never understand creativity. And most people talking about artificial intelligence have no idea of virtue, truth or the sublime. Just stop ✋