Quick Anneal - case length limitation

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 10 ก.พ. 2025
  • i.imgur.com/LO...
    Base to bottom of anneal mark is approximately 0.770" (19.56mm) with the height adjusted to its limits. Any cases shorter than around 0.750" to 0.770" (example, 9mm luger) will not be abled to be annealed.
    The general guideline to set the height without eyeballing or using the included height gauge plug, would require some math by subtracting 19.56 and the amount below the shoulder you want annealed (generally around 5mm which is roughly 0.20" is a good starting point) from "case base to start of shoulder" dimensions. The final number is where the scale hash mark (each hash = 1mm increment) should align with the arrow pointer.
    Example 7.62x51mm cartridge - i.imgur.com/hS...

ความคิดเห็น • 8

  • @Aldocello1
    @Aldocello1 ปีที่แล้ว

    That was my question , and amazing in 24 hours you answered , thanks for verifying

  • @andrewmack7160
    @andrewmack7160 ปีที่แล้ว

    Can I ask where are you located where you are located and how much the quick anneal was?

    • @Evintos
      @Evintos  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Midwest USA, central time zone (don't want to get too specific). It's around $995 USD shipped via FedEx and arrived in 4 days. Quick Anneal sent me an invoice via Yoco (a payment processor) for R18540 (South African Rand/ZAR) - depending on USD/RAND currency conversion rate, it may be higher or lower than $995 USD (did not have to pay US customs tax).
      Some credit cards will charge a "foreign transaction fee" so if making a payment, ensure you use a card that doesn't have one or use a card that charges the lowest amount for that fee. If your credit card also has the option of setting up a "virtual account", do so as that would provide extra added protection from fraud or data breaches.

    • @andrewmack7160
      @andrewmack7160 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thanks I’m on the west coast myself. I sent them a email and then saw your video. Figured I would ask.

    • @andrewmack7160
      @andrewmack7160 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do you have an experience with the AMP Mate Annealer? If so how would you say it compares?

    • @Evintos
      @Evintos  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@andrewmack7160
      I did use my buddy's AMP mk2 (no AMP mate) for 100 pieces of 308 brass manual feeding. The process of inserting a case in the holder and then having to remove the case out of the machine after annealing is done bugged the hell outta me which is why I went with the Quick Anneal. I can just drop a case in and it auto ejects out.
      The other thing I didn't like about the AMP was the various different pilots required for different calibers. Auto case feeder capability didn't matter to me but the both the AMP mk2 and Quick Anneal are capable of it. If you were to add a case feeder to the Quick Anneal it'd be cheaper but you'd have to play with the motor speed so it doesn't drop cases through a drop tube into the annealer too fast.
      I had a flame annealer with pressure regulator running propane prior to the Quick Anneal. In terms of doing the job of annealing, I say the results are pretty much the same between AMP, Quick Anneal and pressure regulated flame, although annealing via induction is faster by a few seconds. However, I don't have a hardness tester to prove it and only judge it by the consistency in my shoulder bump measurements and consistency in neck ID after using an expander mandrel (

    • @FrancoSteyn-d9r
      @FrancoSteyn-d9r ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@andrewmack7160 Quick Anneal is better than an amp, which is why all the Champions are running them but they keep it to them selfs to have the edge.
      Better features and adjustability to fire form etc that amp does not have