I think this comparo was even better than Car and Driver's. First of all, the 3 lines up with the A3 in size, not the A4. Second, I suspect Car and Driver did not actually drive the two cars at the same time because they did not do any of their usual objective scoring, nor did they pick a winner. I think they just copied and pasted two separate tests they already made for the two cars.
A corolla is marketed for masses and with its conservative looks they sell millions of them. The interior for toyotas in general is average at best. However, their engines and mechanical aspect of it is where they shine. I got my 20 corolla LE due to its multi link rear independent suspension and when I'm on highway with that suspension I feel like I'm sitting right on the ground. Whereas for this video I will pick mazda over Mercedes any day till I pass away.
Not to mention Mazda was named the most reliable car brand in the us for 2020, making Mazda the first brand to take that #1 spot from Toyota in over 30 years. All this makes me excited to see the next gen Mazda 6 rumored to be coming out as a 2023 model. from what I hear its moving away from FWD and becoming RWD/AWD with the 2.5 Turbo becoming it's base engine! the base price is going to increase because of that and top end trims is expected to cost over 45,000 but come with the new turbo inline 6 Toyota develop with BMW for the new Supra. Toyota is giving Mazda this engine because Mazda and Toyota entered a partnership a few years back, witch is why new Toyotas handle much better! Mazda is helping Toyota so their cars don't handle poorly anymore and in exchange Toyota is giving Mazda access to certain power trains including the inline 6 and the electric motors/batteries Mazda will be using in all of it's upcoming plug in options.
There is an old test report from a well-known German car newspaper. There, the Mazda mid-range model won against the Mercedes in price, performance and efficiency 😅 it was 1984 So a Mazda is always an option. It is also worth mentioning the very first victory of a Japanese car brand in the 24 Hours of Le man's in the early 90s
I know that your comment is 2 year old 😅 But the price difference is way smaller than that. If you compare the versions of both cars that are comparable (both with the turbo engine and AWD), the Mazda is only $4000 CAD cheaper, at least in Canada
I cross-shopped the Mazda3 with entry level luxury models and went with the Mazda. It gives you 95% of the driving dynamics a normal, non-car reveiwer would need and came fully loaded/AWD for 27k. It's just not worth the extra 10 grand plus for the luxury badge in a trim I would have to settle for to afford. Also, I am buying, not leasing. I'd much rather have the Mazda in 6 years than the Mercedes and others. I know exactly what I am getting in that NA 2.5 liter engine and six speed automatic. Anyway, I've had a great experience with it so far. It stands out, especially in soul red crystal. I've rarely gone more than a few weeks without catching someone admiring it. In this class, it was a no contest for me and it has been a great car.
Not just for the luxury badge, the Mazda will hold up over time far better than that crappy Benz. Not to mention the FIVE year UNLIMITED mileage powertrain warranty on Mazda is only matched by a select few competitors. Mazda #1
This test is all about pr and marketing of the people in it - the irony? is that the same perceived deficits of the Mazda 3 could’ve been found and are found in the Mazda 3 TURBO (if they would’ve done their research). Which has a tighter suspension, heavier engine, dampers, adjusted steering arms (to help cornering), heavier differential and a sport mode that is actually more in tune w the drivetrain (not just the throttle response).....oh ya, and larger tip exhausts.
I wanted cargo room incase I need to buy stuff from Home Depot for some DIY projects, so I cross shopped a Mazda3 AWD hatch and a Toyota Highlander and Honda Pilot, something big for a change after driving a e90 BMW for 12 years. I went with the Mazda. It's just so more fun to drive and it's pretty close in terms of driving characteristic as my old e90. Don't care that I'm in my early 40s still driving a hatchback. I love hatches, sadly I wanted a turbo but C19 screwed up prices and availability. I had to get a CPO 2019 with 18k miles on it, and I don't regret it one bit.
It is the options that made the merc too expensive. I just bought an A35 with 4 good options for 47k otd. It was also the cheapest 35 too lol. Most were mid 50’s, but again, it was the options.
I really like this comparison. I for one does not plan on buying the A220 in the nearest future, but the Mazda 3's overall package just perfectly serves it purpose. It even holds its own. I think what makes it striking at first glance is really the classy exterior.
That was my thought exactly. Some of the things they were discussing as plusses or minuses just don't matter to me. That's okay, because like cars, reviewers can't be all things to all people. I thought the overall analysis was fine. One thing that wasn't mentioned was the cost of maintenance/repairs. Mercedes has the reputation for being a LOT more expensive in that regard.
This review was...strange? The Mazda does have a turbo option, the trunk can be unlocked with the rest of the car (it’s an infotainment setting) and the parking brake won’t engage everytime you stop if you disengage it before you drive. Is he maybe talking about the auto hold funtion? There is a dedicated button to switch it off.
Haha, I agree. They must have been sitting on this footage for at least 6 months, which is even weirder considering they already put out a review for the Mazda 3 Turbo months ago. He mentioned the parking brake in the Turbo review too, and basically his issue is that when you turn the car off the parking brake automatically engages and "when you start back up, you have to manually release it." I found this odd when I heard him complain about that because my Mazda 3's parking brake automatically disengages as soon as I put my foot on the accelerator. It turns out that what he's experiencing is the fact that the parking brake will not automatically disengage **if you don't have your seatbelt on.** So simple fix: just wear your seatbelt like you should already be doing anyway. They also said that "the only thing sport mode does is change the throttle mapping," which is just not true. The Mazda 3 is the first car they've reviewed that I've actually owned, so seeing them say stuff like this really makes me question the credibility of all of their reviews.
Yes, parking brake engages every time to stop car. But to disable this feature (auto engage parking brake) just press and hold the parking brake button until it beeps. Then it won't auto-engage. That's different than auto-hold button which stops the car from rolling when in 'D' and foot off brake (i.e. waiting on train or traffic jam).
This test is all about pr and marketing of the people in it - the irony? is that the same perceived deficits of the Mazda 3 could’ve been found and are found in the Mazda 3 TURBO (if they would’ve done their research). Which has a tighter suspension, heavier engine, dampers, adjusted steering arms (to help cornering), heavier differential and a sport mode that is actually more in tune w the drivetrain (not just the throttle response).....oh ya, and larger tip exhausts. In conclusion, We basically wasted 20 minutes on a publicity stunt made to curtail the hosts agenda ?! Seriously
Same here, just into my 30s and damn it already looks like too much fancy new tech and not enough stuff that will actually work. If my phone or laptop breaks in 3 years, that's alright. If my damn dash display stops working while I'm 300 kilometers away from home and in some mountains, I'm not really into that thing.
however almost every Mazda 3 I see on the road is a rusty mess. Having owned both a mercedes and Japanese cars (Mazda, Acura, Honda) I can say if you live in the rust belt expect rusting prematurely with the latter
I've spent quite a bit of time in both. For a 30k car, the Mazda is built well and uses nice materials. However, the Mercedes is put together just a tiny bit better. Only piece that isnt is the climate control panel, although I think they've fixed that since the early models which I experienced.
Yep, as a fan of new technologies I must admit that these LCD panels are the ugliest thing ever. My old phone had a smaller bezel (I'm not even comparing my new one because it has none and covers like 98% of the front) and the integration of that thing is just hilariously bad.
@@adam145 exactly, for me it's the integration. I haven't seen a full digital dash display in person, so I can't really speak for its utility (don't want to). Unfortunately MB, Audi and BMW all have them now, and they seem to allow every option. but a simple, round gauge layout, but I especially hate, hate the way MB is integrating these things. I've got a BMW F30 and that non-moveable screen to my right is bad enough. I can't imagine having only that to look at facing forward. The only good thing I can say is that it's not in the middle of the car.
@@f1jones544 I know I'm in the minority, but I actually think it looks good now. In ten years it certainly won't, but almost three years in to thus geb's A Class production, I still think it looks great. To me however, the biggest thing is the actual UI, and for my personal tastes, the current MBUX is absolutely fantastic. There is no better system on the market currently in my opinion. It's incredibly intuitive, has much less black then other systems, is very customizable but also easy to save/change settings, super responsive, I just don't have enough good things to say abuut MBUX. The voice assistant is annoying but no journalists seem to realize how easy it is to disable (besides, they need it for the content). I've spent quite a bit of time using this system, Tesla, BMW iDrive 6 and 7, older MB systems, Audi MMI, etc. and I can say confidentally that this is the best UI on the market in a car currently, except for possibly the new google system in Polestar.
I figured as much too and they acknowledged that this was at least part of the difference in the video as well. Still on the stock tires on mine but am planning to change at some point.
The add ones will do that. I just picked up a ‘21 A35 for 47k otd. Only 4 options. If I got all the safety shit the price would of been mid 50’s easy. It’s all about the options on the merc.
@@mengienghinamwaami4894 not for anything more than $40k lol. At that MSRP for this tester you'd be foolish to choose this over an acura tlx or evem a base C300 tbh
@@mengienghinamwaami4894 I know it was. Thats why they should have used the turbo version of the 3 vs the N/A version for a better comparison. Of course they would like the mercedes more for the power factor when youre stuck with less than 200hp in the N/A 3.
Bought a 2020 mazda 3 sedan at a reduced price in Dec 2020 (paid around 23k euro). Best car I've ever owned and it just feels and looks luxurious. Manual gearbox as well, so the lack of a turbo doesn't personally bother me too much. (just shift with slightly higher revs)
You guys wanted more from the Mazda...because you're car guys, you're car reviewers. But the reason Mazda has made so many premium moves the past few years is because the vast majority of their customers aren't car people and don't care about the "zoom zoom" ethos. They don't even advertise that tagline anymore. Even the Miata itself is considerably more premium feeling than its direct competition. So I think you guys aren't viewing these cars from the viewpoint of the people actually buying them, and that's why they don't meet your expectations. Mazda's sales and market share are holding steady but their transaction prices and revenues have gone up so their moves are working.
And this is why I like Savagegeese for his car reviews, he offers different perspectives on the cars, not just for the people that like to tune their cars or slam the gas pedal whatever chance they get.
@@freddy7304 it's in both. the sedan is a bit cheaper because there's less material and it doesnt have as much of the body kit type stuff. Definitely a nice sleeper car.
Mercedes is very expensive to fix when it breaks and break it will. I was a kid in 1994, but that was the last year for a working man to get a quality Mercedes. After that it was all downhill. Mazda for me, thanks.
And you don't think a Mazda can break? I've had to replace the catalytic converter on my 2010 Mazda 3 with 130K miles on it. I've owned Hondas that ran for close to 200K without any problems at all with the cat. Even after replacing the cat, the engine is throwing 2 codes... and I recently replaced the fuel injectors as well. Unless their quality has gone up significantly in recent years, I would not buy another Mazda.
@@242HPyea I love both Mazda and Merc but you can’t really use ownership costs as an argument like some of these people are in the comments lol. Mazda 4cyl engines are incredibly complex for the size jam packed with a lot of easy to break tech and unique engineering approaches that can really only be well maintained by trained Mazda professionals. I’ve had many car, including two Mazdas. A simple oil change was easily in the $175-$190 range. That says something..
@@konliner9286 lol, me and my family been riding Mercs for decades and it's an insult to consumers and loyalist by mercedes to include such cheap fake exhaust. Mercs is just a rolex not patek philip dude, it ain't a Roles royce 😁.
We were surprised at his close the power was on these two. The turbo Mazda is even better - we have a link to our review of it vs the Golf R in the description. Thanks for watching.
Yes! I watched that video as well! I just subscribed to your channel. I love the analysis you guys bring to the channel. The production values are too notch as well. Great work from your newest subscriber from Canada!
@@CristianoWilliams Nice. Ya I love my Mazda and have 0 buyers remorse. Like if I could go back to November 2013 (when I bought it) and someone was like "Here is $100,000 dollars you can spend on buying a car, but just for the initial purchase. You will still be responsible for all running costs, you can't ever sell the car for money, you must own the car for a lest 20 years, and you can't own/lease any other car for those 20 years (you could rent a car on vacation though)...I would buy the EXACT same car. Same VIN and everything, same options (I got all the options except radar cruise control, which I would never use. It would also take up the spot where I have my dash cam mounted).
Only thing I hate about owning a car that someone is reviewing is I notice every little thing they get wrong...like the Sport button in the Mazda. It doesn't only change throttle mapping. It changes transmission shift up and down points and also tweaks Mazda's G-vector control for cornering. It's not the greatest Sport button around but it's not just a throttle map toggle either.
Living with the car you see more of it . You noticed more things good or bad. I do see where you are coming from. Sounds like you’re happy with your purchase and to be honest that all that really matters.😁
I honestly prefer driving in sport mode over standard even for daily commuting. The gear shifts feel more specific and it isn't trying to race to 6th gear all the time. It lets the engine breathe and rev up before moving up a gear. Feels way more responsive.
Curious if they would have been closer or different feelings if it was the turbo awd 3. Personally I think the turbo awd 3 hatch is a tempting daily if you don’t have delusions of track days or 10/10th back road shenanigans.
We are big fans of the turbo mazda 3. Our comparison with that and the golf R is linked in the description. We were surprised at how similar the power was between these two.
@@EverydayDriver I watched and enjoyed that video (I’ve been watching you guys for a long time and appreciate the content) I just picked up a low mileage mk6 GolfR with “stage2” APR tuning and such as a replacement for my cracked head 986 BoxsterS I sold out of frustration. I’ve owned two speed3’s but getting into my mid 30’s I understand and acknowledge what and why Mazda is doing with the 3.
@@XxBluerainxX Two years later and the Turbo is now available in the Mazda 3 sedan as well (Mazda puts that engine in everything except the Miata). Maybe it is time to revisit this comparison?
I’m old but here goes. I highly dislike the new tech in the cars today so many people DO want the car to think and do for them, at that point why do those people want a car? Save your money and get a bus your less likely to see my middle finger. Again kudos to Mazda for having the balls to have less tech then the other car makers. As far as Mazda losing the multi-link rear end 99.9% of drivers won’t care or notice, nor will they be pushing their cars as hard. So the point is kind of moot. Want more feel, etc? Buy a Miata. Mazda wants to broaden their market to more people. In the past most people complained about what your missing. So buy an older Mazda 3 or.......buy something else.
@@BurusutazuPersonal Yeah, I wouldn't say as much tech as the Mercedes but the tech that is there is designed to nudge the driver, not fight them and/or take over. Was part of the design decisions when they were programming all those assistants and aids.
I had an A220 as a rental in Colorado and went up Pike Peaks and was surprised by how capable it was but the transmission was such a pain like you mentioned. It did not listen to me and I figured out after a bit it just wanted to do everything itself which it wasn't horrible at. It still was annoying though. 🙄
Great review, gents. I came from an ND Miata and bought nearly the exact spec A220 you reviewed here (minus $10K). While I miss the zoom zoom, I'm tracking with you on the MB's fairly involving drive. It's held up well for two years, too.
@VinAr Run Had the '07 mazda since release and at 200k miles it still performs like brand new. Mazda is the way to go, sadly they killed Mazdaspeed tho.
In Mazda 6 GT (2018+), if you have a key fob in your pocket, you can unlock the trunk from outside by pressing the switch button underneath the rear Mazda logo.
The reason the “drive mode” resets itself is for EPA compliance. If you could permanently set a mode that gets different MPG, they’d have to EPA rate each individual mode.
Yeah, I don't think this is the case at all. I've owned both cars that keep whatever mode you set and cars that reset to a default each time. Think it's just up to manufacturer preference.
@@chrisdooley6468 I think the A220 is best for those in their 20s. I just bought one but it’s cause I wanted to test the waters with Mercedes. I’m planning on upgrading to the E or S class in 6years
They had the same thoughts when Volvo made their biggest transition.. I don’t think it’s really as big of a deal as some do. It’s just not😅 I mean Mazda has already pretty much established this philosophy for at least 2 decades now. I’m just happy to see them not being dragged down by their Ford hardships anymore and having their heritage and intentions trashed.
Pretty cool to see the Mazda punching above it's weight. This video helped me decide on the 2023 mazda fwd carbon sedan. I like it more everyday I drive it.
My friend has the A220 and I have a 2018 Mazda 3. She was so surprised when she saw my beautiful interior and the white leather...I would take mine over her’s any day. Her car did sound rough as it was driving by, too.
I have my 2019 A220 and it just hit 50k miles. I so love this car. It is so fun to drive. At first J can’t believe that this car only got 188 hp coz it’s quick. 0-60 in around 6 sec. I have never driven a small compact car like this A220. 4matic (awd) really helps this car to have a great performance.
I am driving Mazda CX-5s for a couple of years now. My first experience was that it‘s a ordinary kind of SUV esp. when we are talking about steering and behaviour driving on curved roads. But then I added a „cheap“ strut brace under the front hood and: The car changed it‘s behaviour significantly. Now with every new model of CX-5 the first thing to do is adding a strut brace and I am not disappointed. Maybe the Mazda 3 you tested is missing such a brace, too? In Germany, a strut brace is about 200$ and can be mounted very easily by the car owner itself.
Interior in the Mazda looks very nice. Mercedes interior looks awefull, maybe fancy, but zero class :( If the sport button only changes the trottle, its a very good thing, it means its one less thing that can break in 3-5 years ;) Great video!
I think you guys completely missed one of the core aspects of what the Mazda 3 is trying to do... They are not trying to make a sporty car here, everything about it is tuned for comfort. It's meant to be a really comfortable daily driver, not a sports car winding through canyons.
The A class is solely for the people who just want to say I have a Mercedes. It’s simply entry level. It’s the same with all luxury brands. It’s no surprise the Mazda is going to outshine the entry level Mercedes
Great video! I have the A220 and i really like it, everyone in the comments lean towards the Mazda.....Also you gotta be smart when you purchase, the scheduled maintenances cost a fortune....I told them, I'll buy the car but they would have to cover the costs of the maintenance and they agreed
7 min into this and I need to mention. I have the mazda and sedan. Sport mode does as they say the throttle does but also runs each gear longer than eco mode (sport off). I installed a pedal commander as well wich greatly improved throttle response. It is lacking a bit in that aspect but drive by wire will do that for mileage.
Mercedes died 20 years ago in terms of reliability. And today, I don't wanna pay $40,000 or something for visiting a dealer for repair on the regular base. Mercedes! Think about your quality, about balance in a category price-quality.
That Mercedes interior is absolutely disgusting. I cannot comprehend how people can see it as beautiful, modern and elegant. The once classy and elegant Benz turned into a stripclub looking gadget on wheels.
I just got a a220 4 matic 2019 for about 25k with 24k miles on it. My first real car and i love it. Plan on financing for 2 years then trading for an AMG
I properly enjoyed this comparison! I love seeing reviews that compare cars from slightly different segments, tired of the Mazda 3 vs Civic vs Corolla stuff (although I understand its value)
Great comparison. I like the Mercedes looks better and the short back end. I'm not sure it's worth 10 to 20k more $usd?Thanks for making the video! Love those roads you drove them on! Cheers! 👍😎👍
You guys should do a comparison with the Mazda 3 turbo. I have one of those and with 93octane fuel I’m pushing 250hp and 320lb-ft of torque. It’s an amazing feel this car gives
Im a big car lover since a was a kid, The older I get the more I get convinced that non premium brands like Mazda beats for way too far the premium brands like Mercedes in this case. Some brands are just Status anda that’s totally fine too
the mercedes appeals to people who care more about style than substance (in fact the whole fwd german car segment in the US exists because of people who care about the badge first) the Mazda is the exact opposite just notice which car annoyed the driver the most when it actually came to driving it
The Mercedes has better steering feel and handles wayyyy better, and rides better too. The Mercedes is the better car here people are just freaked out about the price lol
I had the 2014 3, how do you like yours? I ended up buying a 2018 3 Series wagon because I wanted AWD, more power engine, and a bit bigger hatch. I still like Mazdas tho. If they bring a Wagon Mazda 6, I will look into it.
@@TheRealVranesh I was coming from a 2013 Audi S6 with 500hp. The hit in power took a lot of getting used to. But the ride, handling, and interior noise is just as nice as the Audi. What I really dislike is the piano black trim around the shifter. Scratched on day one. The AWD system with tc off will let you powerslide and do donuts with ease. Sends a lot of power to the rear wheels
The prime motivators here are, which one will cost the least to own, and which one will last longer. Is the right choice becoming clear? Thanks for an “outside the box” comparo. Cheers.
Prime motivators to you, but not to the 16,000 that buy/lease these annually. I would take the Merc over the Mazda if I was in the market for a new car.
@@benjaminkohl342 I strongly encourage you to watch individual reviews on both of these cars, and will wish you the best with whichever choice you make.
@@2W3X4YZ5 I'm not disagreeing with you and saying the Mercedes is more reliable then the Mazda, I'm simply saying that reliability and long term ownership are not everyone's top priorities, including my own.
@@benjaminkohl342 No problem. We all drive what we want, after all. If this were 1990 and you were trying to get me to trade my W123 in on a Mazda, I would feel the same way. It’s a matter of knowing what you have. Cheers.
luxury brands are never good value compared to mainstream brands. Long term reliability doesn't really matter in a new car because most people that buy/lease them won't keep them for more than 3-6 years
@@kristians2704 I'm not sure if they are even to last 3-6 years without major hiccups for their owners. Check the market value of 10-year-old Lexus and Mercedes. So, it still matters, maybe not for everyone, but for a large number of owners for sure
@@topspot9417 reliability matters for the people who are buying them as used second-hand cars but not really for the first owner becuae all of them are reliable for the first 5,6 years
The parking brake in my Mazda 3 releases when I put it in drive and press on the accelerator pedal. At 2:40 you report that the car lurches against the parking brake for a second, why is your experience different? There is a guy on TH-cam with a Mazda 3 Turbo who mentions that the parking brake automatically releases when you put it in drive and apply pressure to the accelerator. Why do you make it seem like a whole ordeal?
the trunk of the merc looks like an option, like something you either tick or not when specifying the car... and i am not sure which version this is mazda looks way better
@@yvesdanjou6250 under six seconds is incorrect, the A220 does 0-60 in 7.1 seconds. It does have a lot more torque than the Mazda N/A because of the turbo. The Mercedes spec is directly from the Mercedez website. The funny thing is that the Mazda is also in the 7-second range. I think they were biased. Now, if you go price by price, the new Mazda turbo model would eat the Mercedes for breakfast. $32.600 MSRP AWD 2.5T/ 250HP/ 320 Torque
$50k fully loaded vs $30k fully loaded. Mazda did a great job, low maintenance and economics for long run instead Mercedes. i’ll stick with mazda for long run with small budget.
Interesting comparo. Well done fellas. I still think the 3 sedan looks luscious and unlike many BMW's you don't have to get black seats that burn your ass.
Comparing Mazda3 with a Mercedes itself is a win-win for Mazda. Car & Driver even compared it with a Audi A4. Cudos to Mazda.
I think this comparo was even better than Car and Driver's. First of all, the 3 lines up with the A3 in size, not the A4. Second, I suspect Car and Driver did not actually drive the two cars at the same time because they did not do any of their usual objective scoring, nor did they pick a winner. I think they just copied and pasted two separate tests they already made for the two cars.
@Ordinary Citizen C Class is not in the same class as the A class or Mazda 3. C Class is a size bigger
@Ordinary Citizen Lol Stupid Citizen spotted
@Ordinary Citizen Yes, and a fully loaded C class is similar price range to a entry E class. So everyone should buy an E class?
@@kienfung3045 Loaded E AMG cost more than a S class so might as well compare the S to the Mazda3.
When Mazda is so premium they are being compared to a luxury brand. You can't do this to a Corolla.
A corolla is marketed for masses and with its conservative looks they sell millions of them. The interior for toyotas in general is average at best. However, their engines and mechanical aspect of it is where they shine. I got my 20 corolla LE due to its multi link rear independent suspension and when I'm on highway with that suspension I feel like I'm sitting right on the ground. Whereas for this video I will pick mazda over Mercedes any day till I pass away.
Two different classes of cars , thankyou.
Or to a Civic?
Nope that's what Lexus is for
just for you sir, TOYOTA or Mazda?
I was driving Mercedes but now I am driving Madza 3 2018. I realise that really Mazda are doing a great job...People should try Mazda
Not to mention Mazda was named the most reliable car brand in the us for 2020, making Mazda the first brand to take that #1 spot from Toyota in over 30 years.
All this makes me excited to see the next gen Mazda 6 rumored to be coming out as a 2023 model. from what I hear its moving away from FWD and becoming RWD/AWD with the 2.5 Turbo becoming it's base engine! the base price is going to increase because of that and top end trims is expected to cost over 45,000 but come with the new turbo inline 6 Toyota develop with BMW for the new Supra.
Toyota is giving Mazda this engine because Mazda and Toyota entered a partnership a few years back, witch is why new Toyotas handle much better! Mazda is helping Toyota so their cars don't handle poorly anymore and in exchange Toyota is giving Mazda access to certain power trains including the inline 6 and the electric motors/batteries Mazda will be using in all of it's upcoming plug in options.
First time to try Mazda, so far im loving it
There is an old test report from a well-known German car newspaper. There, the Mazda mid-range model won against the Mercedes in price, performance and efficiency 😅 it was 1984
So a Mazda is always an option.
It is also worth mentioning the very first victory of a Japanese car brand in the 24 Hours of Le man's in the early 90s
My wife and I tried Mazda about 10 years ago. We now own three of them.
I also went from a Mercedes to Mazda, and I like the Mazda, it’s luxurious and it’s cheaper to maintain a Mazda... Mazda is a better build
so the Mazda is +/- 20.000 dollars cheaper..and still holding up. I'm honestly quite impressed
I know that your comment is 2 year old 😅 But the price difference is way smaller than that. If you compare the versions of both cars that are comparable (both with the turbo engine and AWD), the Mazda is only $4000 CAD cheaper, at least in Canada
Mazda all the way, plus after 100,000 miles it’s still amazing.
I cross-shopped the Mazda3 with entry level luxury models and went with the Mazda.
It gives you 95% of the driving dynamics a normal, non-car reveiwer would need and came fully loaded/AWD for 27k. It's just not worth the extra 10 grand plus for the luxury badge in a trim I would have to settle for to afford.
Also, I am buying, not leasing. I'd much rather have the Mazda in 6 years than the Mercedes and others. I know exactly what I am getting in that NA 2.5 liter engine and six speed automatic.
Anyway, I've had a great experience with it so far. It stands out, especially in soul red crystal. I've rarely gone more than a few weeks without catching someone admiring it. In this class, it was a no contest for me and it has been a great car.
Not just for the luxury badge, the Mazda will hold up over time far better than that crappy Benz. Not to mention the FIVE year UNLIMITED mileage powertrain warranty on Mazda is only matched by a select few competitors. Mazda #1
This test is all about pr and marketing of the people in it - the irony? is that the same perceived deficits of the Mazda 3 could’ve been found and are found in the Mazda 3 TURBO (if they would’ve done their research). Which has a tighter suspension, heavier engine, dampers, adjusted steering arms (to help cornering), heavier differential and a sport mode that is actually more in tune w the drivetrain (not just the throttle response).....oh ya, and larger tip exhausts.
I wanted cargo room incase I need to buy stuff from Home Depot for some DIY projects, so I cross shopped a Mazda3 AWD hatch and a Toyota Highlander and Honda Pilot, something big for a change after driving a e90 BMW for 12 years. I went with the Mazda. It's just so more fun to drive and it's pretty close in terms of driving characteristic as my old e90. Don't care that I'm in my early 40s still driving a hatchback. I love hatches, sadly I wanted a turbo but C19 screwed up prices and availability. I had to get a CPO 2019 with 18k miles on it, and I don't regret it one bit.
Some A or even C class models have renault engine... That's awful...
The Mazda is a $30K car with the looks of a $40K car.
The Merc is a $50K car with the looks of a $30K car.
the mercedes is a 30k car smart one+
I tried sitting in Mazda 3’s back seat and it was not pleasant, like sea-sick feeling. Mercedes A class sedan is way more comfortable.
Nah the Merc looks better, but the 3 is a good car
It is the options that made the merc too expensive. I just bought an A35 with 4 good options for 47k otd. It was also the cheapest 35 too lol. Most were mid 50’s, but again, it was the options.
@@omairsh8 Don't agree. 3 looks better.
The Mazda will hold up and last for ever the Mercedes will be very expensive to keep on the road.
Having the '07 mazda 3 at 200k miles. It's still drives like new, 0 problems.
Mazda3s are very reliable cars. Proves that reliability doesn’t have to come at the cost of blandness (*cough* Corolla)
+ cheap plastics, poor interior quality and with no history behind it (CLA sedan)
@@Nickoboss29 cheap plastics, poor interior quality and no histolry? mate, this isnt some BMW, whatever you are saying is not true.
@@unknown_4656 it's true, Mercedes has stepped down by a lot in the interior quality.
I really like this comparison. I for one does not plan on buying the A220 in the nearest future, but the Mazda 3's overall package just perfectly serves it purpose. It even holds its own. I think what makes it striking at first glance is really the classy exterior.
Let's be honest, nobody push these cars as much as you did. For the potential buyers, Mazda will do just fine without spending 50k on a small sedan!
That was my thought exactly. Some of the things they were discussing as plusses or minuses just don't matter to me. That's okay, because like cars, reviewers can't be all things to all people. I thought the overall analysis was fine. One thing that wasn't mentioned was the cost of maintenance/repairs. Mercedes has the reputation for being a LOT more expensive in that regard.
And then theres the reliability and maintenance cost.
Yeah, honesty is good...thanks for being an honest chap..lol
And the Mazda will come with a tonne more standard equipment and safety features that Mercedes will gladly ask you to get a optional “package” for.
That is the main problem of most of these channels . It is not for everyday Joe
This review was...strange? The Mazda does have a turbo option, the trunk can be unlocked with the rest of the car (it’s an infotainment setting) and the parking brake won’t engage everytime you stop if you disengage it before you drive. Is he maybe talking about the auto hold funtion? There is a dedicated button to switch it off.
Haha, I agree. They must have been sitting on this footage for at least 6 months, which is even weirder considering they already put out a review for the Mazda 3 Turbo months ago.
He mentioned the parking brake in the Turbo review too, and basically his issue is that when you turn the car off the parking brake automatically engages and "when you start back up, you have to manually release it." I found this odd when I heard him complain about that because my Mazda 3's parking brake automatically disengages as soon as I put my foot on the accelerator. It turns out that what he's experiencing is the fact that the parking brake will not automatically disengage **if you don't have your seatbelt on.** So simple fix: just wear your seatbelt like you should already be doing anyway.
They also said that "the only thing sport mode does is change the throttle mapping," which is just not true. The Mazda 3 is the first car they've reviewed that I've actually owned, so seeing them say stuff like this really makes me question the credibility of all of their reviews.
Yes, parking brake engages every time to stop car. But to disable this feature (auto engage parking brake) just press and hold the parking brake button until it beeps. Then it won't auto-engage. That's different than auto-hold button which stops the car from rolling when in 'D' and foot off brake (i.e. waiting on train or traffic jam).
Since this aired in August 2019, I'm assuming this must be for the 2019 models. They didn't have a turbo option until 2021.
This test is all about pr and marketing of the people in it - the irony? is that the same perceived deficits of the Mazda 3 could’ve been found and are found in the Mazda 3 TURBO (if they would’ve done their research). Which has a tighter suspension, heavier engine, dampers, adjusted steering arms (to help cornering), heavier differential and a sport mode that is actually more in tune w the drivetrain (not just the throttle response).....oh ya, and larger tip exhausts. In conclusion, We basically wasted 20 minutes on a publicity stunt made to curtail the hosts agenda ?! Seriously
@@GL12878 ah touche- interesting !
Mazda would be my pick. I know it will last. Too much tech in a Mercedes. Great episode 👍
You must be old. too much tech?
In my 30’s... I just like less nannies and automatic things on a vehicle. Tech usually doesn’t age very well either
@@MauriceBln1 to a point there’s too much tech. Doesn’t age as well as analog stuff
Same here, just into my 30s and damn it already looks like too much fancy new tech and not enough stuff that will actually work. If my phone or laptop breaks in 3 years, that's alright. If my damn dash display stops working while I'm 300 kilometers away from home and in some mountains, I'm not really into that thing.
@@georgetheodossopoulos7827 No car today is without a lot of technology. You can buy a Lada because it has very simple technology 😂😂😂
Thanks for this video. I think long term I'd rather have the Mazda...lease the Mercedes, buy the Mazda.
The Mazda is probably way better put together on the inside.
however almost every Mazda 3 I see on the road is a rusty mess. Having owned both a mercedes and Japanese cars (Mazda, Acura, Honda) I can say if you live in the rust belt expect rusting prematurely with the latter
I've spent quite a bit of time in both. For a 30k car, the Mazda is built well and uses nice materials. However, the Mercedes is put together just a tiny bit better. Only piece that isnt is the climate control panel, although I think they've fixed that since the early models which I experienced.
@@benjaminkohl342 Mazda is #1 in reliability. I don’t think Mercedes even makes the list.
@@kellyyyanneee Yes, the Mazda is more reliable. The Mercedes has better build quality, though.
@@benjaminkohl342 does it though? Mercedes is know for creaking interiors on BRAND NEW CARS. Even as high as the S-Class and GT.
There is a trunk button under the Mazda emblem on the trunk lid
Governments: Eyes off your phone scree while driving
Mercedes: What if we made the car the phone screen
Lol 😂
what if we made the car the entire computer
everytime you start the car it says do not let the command destract you from the road situation and you know that right?
Those Mercedes iPad dashes will not age well.
Wait, it's Thursday. They didn't.
Hahahahaha good job 👏
Yep, as a fan of new technologies I must admit that these LCD panels are the ugliest thing ever. My old phone had a smaller bezel (I'm not even comparing my new one because it has none and covers like 98% of the front) and the integration of that thing is just hilariously bad.
@@adam145 exactly, for me it's the integration. I haven't seen a full digital dash display in person, so I can't really speak for its utility (don't want to). Unfortunately MB, Audi and BMW all have them now, and they seem to allow every option. but a simple, round gauge layout, but I especially hate, hate the way MB is integrating these things. I've got a BMW F30 and that non-moveable screen to my right is bad enough. I can't imagine having only that to look at facing forward. The only good thing I can say is that it's not in the middle of the car.
@@f1jones544 I know I'm in the minority, but I actually think it looks good now. In ten years it certainly won't, but almost three years in to thus geb's A Class production, I still think it looks great. To me however, the biggest thing is the actual UI, and for my personal tastes, the current MBUX is absolutely fantastic. There is no better system on the market currently in my opinion. It's incredibly intuitive, has much less black then other systems, is very customizable but also easy to save/change settings, super responsive, I just don't have enough good things to say abuut MBUX. The voice assistant is annoying but no journalists seem to realize how easy it is to disable (besides, they need it for the content).
I've spent quite a bit of time using this system, Tesla, BMW iDrive 6 and 7, older MB systems, Audi MMI, etc. and I can say confidentally that this is the best UI on the market in a car currently, except for possibly the new google system in Polestar.
Yes it's just seems so lazy
100% right about the stock tires, put Pilot Sport A/S4's on my 3, steering is alive now. Way comfier too.
I figured as much too and they acknowledged that this was at least part of the difference in the video as well. Still on the stock tires on mine but am planning to change at some point.
That's my ONLY critique on the Mazda3 is the stock tires are bad. Upgrade them, and it's BY FAR one of the best bang for buck car you can buy!
@@ZoraPMC what tires would you recommend?
I put Pirelli P Zero AS Plus on my 2019 AWD hatch. Man it transformed the car.
@@raghav265 I put P Zero AS Plus, same as the A220 Merc. Great tire, and I got it with a $80 gift card from Pirelli.
$52k? Hell. No.
I couldn't tell someone that I spent $52k+ on a 188 HP A220 with a straight face hahaha
Yeah the price is one big oof. 50k gives you the biggest Mazda, CX-9, fully loaded with leather interior, AWD system and 2.5 turbo engine.
The add ones will do that. I just picked up a ‘21 A35 for 47k otd. Only 4 options. If I got all the safety shit the price would of been mid 50’s easy. It’s all about the options on the merc.
But the Mazda 3 has an awd/turbo option though and for everything you get would still be less than the merc.
The Mercedes has an AWD/turbo as well and it’s well worth its price
@@mengienghinamwaami4894 not for anything more than $40k lol. At that MSRP for this tester you'd be foolish to choose this over an acura tlx or evem a base C300 tbh
@@mengienghinamwaami4894 I know it was. Thats why they should have used the turbo version of the 3 vs the N/A version for a better comparison. Of course they would like the mercedes more for the power factor when youre stuck with less than 200hp in the N/A 3.
I got the top package of the turbo for less than the list on the car they tested.
no turbo in the eu
Bought a 2020 mazda 3 sedan at a reduced price in Dec 2020 (paid around 23k euro). Best car I've ever owned and it just feels and looks luxurious. Manual gearbox as well, so the lack of a turbo doesn't personally bother me too much. (just shift with slightly higher revs)
Why not compare the Mazda3 turbo vs the A class. Then u get more power and better dynamics for still roughly 17k less!
Because the Merc would look awful
@@rezhaadriantanuharja3389 Exactly
i doubt Mercedes will give them a car to review ever again if they did that lol.
This video is from 2019 as stated in the description of the video. The Mazda 3 turbo didn’t exist then.
mazda didn't pay them
Verry nice Video! My favorite is the Mazda. I like the reduced design and the clean cockpit.
Best regards from germany.
I bought the Mazda in March, I'm everyday happy to drive it, I really love it 👌🏼
You guys wanted more from the Mazda...because you're car guys, you're car reviewers. But the reason Mazda has made so many premium moves the past few years is because the vast majority of their customers aren't car people and don't care about the "zoom zoom" ethos. They don't even advertise that tagline anymore. Even the Miata itself is considerably more premium feeling than its direct competition. So I think you guys aren't viewing these cars from the viewpoint of the people actually buying them, and that's why they don't meet your expectations. Mazda's sales and market share are holding steady but their transaction prices and revenues have gone up so their moves are working.
And this is why I like Savagegeese for his car reviews, he offers different perspectives on the cars, not just for the people that like to tune their cars or slam the gas pedal whatever chance they get.
filmed before they got the turbo mazda3. what a shame
I think the turbo only comes in hatchback though right?
@@freddy7304 it's in both. the sedan is a bit cheaper because there's less material and it doesnt have as much of the body kit type stuff. Definitely a nice sleeper car.
@@granthemstreet3209 Thats good, i personally dont like the look of hatchbacks.
@@freddy7304 I think the sedan is super sleek but the uniqueness and practicality of the hatchback would make me go for it
@Just think the CX30? How come? I mean yeah it’s similar but the suspension in the mazda3 is soft enough
Mercedes is very expensive to fix when it breaks and break it will. I was a kid in 1994, but that was the last year for a working man to get a quality Mercedes. After that it was all downhill. Mazda for me, thanks.
And you don't think a Mazda can break? I've had to replace the catalytic converter on my 2010 Mazda 3 with 130K miles on it. I've owned Hondas that ran for close to 200K without any problems at all with the cat. Even after replacing the cat, the engine is throwing 2 codes... and I recently replaced the fuel injectors as well. Unless their quality has gone up significantly in recent years, I would not buy another Mazda.
@@242HPyea I love both Mazda and Merc but you can’t really use ownership costs as an argument like some of these people are in the comments lol. Mazda 4cyl engines are incredibly complex for the size jam packed with a lot of easy to break tech and unique engineering approaches that can really only be well maintained by trained Mazda professionals. I’ve had many car, including two Mazdas. A simple oil change was easily in the $175-$190 range. That says something..
They should have brought the turbo. Sure not similar hp numbers but it's the turbo that makes it more bang for your buck against the Benz.
MAZDA3 for the win... I've always loved this brand and this new generation of the Mazda3 is to die for! I wanna get the hatchback!
Mazda...No Fake exhausts, no fake air channels intake . 👍 . The Merc is like a rolex with fake plastic dial button as exhaust.
Its an insult to compare Mercedes with Rolex. Rolex is like Lexus but a bit overpriced.
@@konliner9286 lol, me and my family been riding Mercs for decades and it's an insult to consumers and loyalist by mercedes to include such cheap fake exhaust. Mercs is just a rolex not patek philip dude, it ain't a Roles royce 😁.
Mazda 3 is better buy than A220 and BMW 2 series with FWD. Mazda hatch is even sexy looking
You do the comparison with the Mazda 3 turbo and I think that makes this an even more compelling argument.
We were surprised at his close the power was on these two. The turbo Mazda is even better - we have a link to our review of it vs the Golf R in the description. Thanks for watching.
Yes! I watched that video as well! I just subscribed to your channel. I love the analysis you guys bring to the channel. The production values are too notch as well. Great work from your newest subscriber from Canada!
For the cost of the Mercedes, you could get the Mazda3 AND a used ND Miata!
When I bought my 2014 Mazda 3 GT, I was cross shopping a Mecedes CLA.
I had a CLA for 3 years and then sold it. Got a Mazda 3 now and although the CLA was better, I can't fault the Mazda for reliability and quality.
@@CristianoWilliams Nice. Ya I love my Mazda and have 0 buyers remorse.
Like if I could go back to November 2013 (when I bought it) and someone was like "Here is $100,000 dollars you can spend on buying a car, but just for the initial purchase. You will still be responsible for all running costs, you can't ever sell the car for money, you must own the car for a lest 20 years, and you can't own/lease any other car for those 20 years (you could rent a car on vacation though)...I would buy the EXACT same car. Same VIN and everything, same options (I got all the options except radar cruise control, which I would never use. It would also take up the spot where I have my dash cam mounted).
With all due respect I own a Mazda 3 2020 y none of what you said about the automatic brakes or the trunk is correct
I also own a 2019 Mazda 3,and agree with you.
They had to find bad things to say lol
Only thing I hate about owning a car that someone is reviewing is I notice every little thing they get wrong...like the Sport button in the Mazda. It doesn't only change throttle mapping. It changes transmission shift up and down points and also tweaks Mazda's G-vector control for cornering. It's not the greatest Sport button around but it's not just a throttle map toggle either.
Living with the car you see more of it . You noticed more things good or bad. I do see where you are coming from. Sounds like you’re happy with your purchase and to be honest that all that really matters.😁
Also, my trunk unlocks when I unlock the car. Lol!
I honestly prefer driving in sport mode over standard even for daily commuting. The gear shifts feel more specific and it isn't trying to race to 6th gear all the time. It lets the engine breathe and rev up before moving up a gear. Feels way more responsive.
I wanna watch this comparison of these same two cars 8 years later, and list out repair expense. ;)
Curious if they would have been closer or different feelings if it was the turbo awd 3. Personally I think the turbo awd 3 hatch is a tempting daily if you don’t have delusions of track days or 10/10th back road shenanigans.
We are big fans of the turbo mazda 3. Our comparison with that and the golf R is linked in the description.
We were surprised at how similar the power was between these two.
@@EverydayDriver I watched and enjoyed that video (I’ve been watching you guys for a long time and appreciate the content) I just picked up a low mileage mk6 GolfR with “stage2” APR tuning and such as a replacement for my cracked head 986 BoxsterS I sold out of frustration. I’ve owned two speed3’s but getting into my mid 30’s I understand and acknowledge what and why Mazda is doing with the 3.
@@EverydayDriver so I suppose the follow up question is, if it was the Mazda Turbo vs the Merc, would it have flipped places?
@@echang527 it was sedan vs sedan.
@@XxBluerainxX Two years later and the Turbo is now available in the Mazda 3 sedan as well (Mazda puts that engine in everything except the Miata).
Maybe it is time to revisit this comparison?
the mazda 3 looks better from the rear than the a class
I agree
I think from the front too. That Mazda front end is stunning……very unique!
✌🏻✌🏻
@@oceanlover3530 agreed they’re the top in Japanese cars
The Mazda looks surprisingly better than the Merc.
I’m old but here goes. I highly dislike the new tech in the cars today so many people DO want the car to think and do for them, at that point why do those people want a car? Save your money and get a bus your less likely to see my middle finger. Again kudos to Mazda for having the balls to have less tech then the other car makers.
As far as Mazda losing the multi-link rear end 99.9% of drivers won’t care or notice, nor will they be pushing their cars as hard. So the point is kind of moot. Want more feel, etc? Buy a Miata. Mazda wants to broaden their market to more people. In the past most people complained about what your missing.
So buy an older Mazda 3 or.......buy something else.
Mazda is full of tech but they let you disable all of it.
@@BurusutazuPersonal yes and no but your right they do allow you to turn them off.
@@BurusutazuPersonal Yeah, I wouldn't say as much tech as the Mercedes but the tech that is there is designed to nudge the driver, not fight them and/or take over. Was part of the design decisions when they were programming all those assistants and aids.
I had an A220 as a rental in Colorado and went up Pike Peaks and was surprised by how capable it was but the transmission was such a pain like you mentioned. It did not listen to me and I figured out after a bit it just wanted to do everything itself which it wasn't horrible at. It still was annoying though. 🙄
I admire how both of you stick to your opinions. Makes it easier for us car buying people. Keep that shit up!!!
Great review, gents. I came from an ND Miata and bought nearly the exact spec A220 you reviewed here (minus $10K). While I miss the zoom zoom, I'm tracking with you on the MB's fairly involving drive. It's held up well for two years, too.
Mazda always. + RELIABILITY THAT MAY FRIEND IS PRICELESS . Not like the Mercedes
@VinAr Run Had the '07 mazda since release and at 200k miles it still performs like brand new. Mazda is the way to go, sadly they killed Mazdaspeed tho.
The front end of that Mazda is gorgeous! Sleek, sporty aggressive. Beautiful car!
✌🏻✌🏻
In Mazda 6 GT (2018+), if you have a key fob in your pocket, you can unlock the trunk from outside by pressing the switch button underneath the rear Mazda logo.
I've got the 2020 Mazda 3, the trunk actually unlocks when you unlock the car.
Same with mazda 3 . Opens with key fob in pocket
@@robertrobert85 yep, even if the car is locked, if I have my key in pocket and walk up to the truck I can open it with the lever.
The fact they are comparing Mazda with a Mercedes is a great signal Mazda is doing a great job.
A Mazda standing up to a Merc, well done to Mazda.
The reason the “drive mode” resets itself is for EPA compliance. If you could permanently set a mode that gets different MPG, they’d have to EPA rate each individual mode.
I drive a Golf R, it starts in whatever mode I left it in when i shut it off.
Yeah, I don't think this is the case at all. I've owned both cars that keep whatever mode you set and cars that reset to a default each time. Think it's just up to manufacturer preference.
I’d buy the Mazda all day. The quality of that Mercedes is horrendous. My buddy has one and traded it in after six months for a Honda Accord Sport lol
MB is bettter.
@@MauriceBln1 then you go buy one lol. The thing is cheap and nasty inside
@@MauriceBln1 If you're not going to luxury spec it, why bother buying the luxury car?
@@chrisdooley6468 I think the A220 is best for those in their 20s. I just bought one but it’s cause I wanted to test the waters with Mercedes. I’m planning on upgrading to the E or S class in 6years
@@vassybaby16 that makes sense. Good luck
They had the same thoughts when Volvo made their biggest transition.. I don’t think it’s really as big of a deal as some do. It’s just not😅 I mean Mazda has already pretty much established this philosophy for at least 2 decades now. I’m just happy to see them not being dragged down by their Ford hardships anymore and having their heritage and intentions trashed.
About time someone is brave enough to make such a detailed side by side comparison.
We appreciate it, thank you for watching.
Pretty cool to see the Mazda punching above it's weight. This video helped me decide on the 2023 mazda fwd carbon sedan. I like it more everyday I drive it.
My friend has the A220 and I have a 2018 Mazda 3. She was so surprised when she saw my beautiful interior and the white leather...I would take mine over her’s any day. Her car did sound rough as it was driving by, too.
"It's a great looking cabin in the dark."
Yup...they sure hit that interior with the ugly-stick. Hard.
Price is most important for most of people
I have my 2019 A220 and it just hit 50k miles. I so love this car. It is so fun to drive. At first J can’t believe that this car only got 188 hp coz it’s quick. 0-60 in around 6 sec. I have never driven a small compact car like this A220. 4matic (awd) really helps this car to have a great performance.
I am driving Mazda CX-5s for a couple of years now. My first experience was that it‘s a ordinary kind of SUV esp. when we are talking about steering and behaviour driving on curved roads. But then I added a „cheap“ strut brace under the front hood and: The car changed it‘s behaviour significantly. Now with every new model of CX-5 the first thing to do is adding a strut brace and I am not disappointed.
Maybe the Mazda 3 you tested is missing such a brace, too? In Germany, a strut brace is about 200$ and can be mounted very easily by the car owner itself.
Thank for setting off everything in my apartment @ 5:17.
HAHAHAHA
Oh man, when he started saying all that I was bracing myself.....but he never said "Hey Siri" so I was safe. lol
And we all know the Mazda will be more reliable and longer lasting rust aside.
Interior in the Mazda looks very nice. Mercedes interior looks awefull, maybe fancy, but zero class :(
If the sport button only changes the trottle, its a very good thing, it means its one less thing that can break in 3-5 years ;)
Great video!
I went from my first car being a 2012 Mazda 3 to my 2018 Mazda 6 and it was such an upgrade for 6 years
the interior looks much sorted in the mazda. both look premium inside but the merc looks like a kitsch, whereas Mazda looks elegant and original.
I'd love a rematch with the turbo 3 vs the merc
This reminds me of a comparison Road & Track did in 1985(?) of the 190E versus Accord SEi.
I think you guys completely missed one of the core aspects of what the Mazda 3 is trying to do... They are not trying to make a sporty car here, everything about it is tuned for comfort. It's meant to be a really comfortable daily driver, not a sports car winding through canyons.
The A class is solely for the people who just want to say I have a Mercedes. It’s simply entry level. It’s the same with all luxury brands. It’s no surprise the Mazda is going to outshine the entry level Mercedes
The Mazda 3 Turbo would blow this A-Class out the water
Great video! I have the A220 and i really like it, everyone in the comments lean towards the Mazda.....Also you gotta be smart when you purchase, the scheduled maintenances cost a fortune....I told them, I'll buy the car but they would have to cover the costs of the maintenance and they agreed
7 min into this and I need to mention. I have the mazda and sedan. Sport mode does as they say the throttle does but also runs each gear longer than eco mode (sport off). I installed a pedal commander as well wich greatly improved throttle response. It is lacking a bit in that aspect but drive by wire will do that for mileage.
From experience with my wife's Mazda3 better tires do WONDERS for it.
51K for a class? HAHAHAHA. I won't even pay 30K for it.
Mercedes died 20 years ago in terms of reliability. And today, I don't wanna pay $40,000 or something for visiting a dealer for repair on the regular base. Mercedes! Think about your quality, about balance in a category price-quality.
That Mercedes interior is absolutely disgusting. I cannot comprehend how people can see it as beautiful, modern and elegant. The once classy and elegant Benz turned into a stripclub looking gadget on wheels.
It’s fun when your young and all your friends love the light show lol
I just got a a220 4 matic 2019 for about 25k with 24k miles on it. My first real car and i love it. Plan on financing for 2 years then trading for an AMG
I properly enjoyed this comparison! I love seeing reviews that compare cars from slightly different segments, tired of the Mazda 3 vs Civic vs Corolla stuff (although I understand its value)
Glad you enjoyed. Thank you for watching!
Great comparison. I like the Mercedes looks better and the short back end. I'm not sure it's worth 10 to 20k more $usd?Thanks for making the video! Love those roads you drove them on! Cheers! 👍😎👍
You guys should do a comparison with the Mazda 3 turbo. I have one of those and with 93octane fuel I’m pushing 250hp and 320lb-ft of torque. It’s an amazing feel this car gives
Im a big car lover since a was a kid, The older I get the more I get convinced that non premium brands like Mazda beats for way too far the premium brands like Mercedes in this case. Some brands are just Status anda that’s totally fine too
Mazda: looks better, cheaper, more reliable, cheaper repair costs
So nicely done. Huge fan - since 2011. My fav review was the 335is with the CT5 and S5... I love your channel.
Thanks for being such a long term viewer!
the mercedes appeals to people who care more about style than substance (in fact the whole fwd german car segment in the US exists because of people who care about the badge first)
the Mazda is the exact opposite
just notice which car annoyed the driver the most when it actually came to driving it
Honestly I would really enjoy my time in the Merc.
The Mercedes has better steering feel and handles wayyyy better, and rides better too. The Mercedes is the better car here people are just freaked out about the price lol
@@mengienghinamwaami4894 not significantly better than the Mazda enough to warrant its price tag and eventual worse depreciation.
@@mengienghinamwaami4894 Wished everyone had your common sense.
Sport mode on the mazda 3 also keeps lower gears aswell as throttle mapping. I own a 2019 hatch awd premium myself
I had the 2014 3, how do you like yours? I ended up buying a 2018 3 Series wagon because I wanted AWD, more power engine, and a bit bigger hatch. I still like Mazdas tho. If they bring a Wagon Mazda 6, I will look into it.
@@TheRealVranesh I was coming from a 2013 Audi S6 with 500hp. The hit in power took a lot of getting used to. But the ride, handling, and interior noise is just as nice as the Audi. What I really dislike is the piano black trim around the shifter. Scratched on day one. The AWD system with tc off will let you powerslide and do donuts with ease. Sends a lot of power to the rear wheels
The prime motivators here are, which one will cost the least to own, and which one will last longer. Is the right choice becoming clear? Thanks for an “outside the box” comparo. Cheers.
...as clear as a Mazda badge if those are the factors. :) I don't think anyone buys a modern Mercedes for the cost of ownership.
Prime motivators to you, but not to the 16,000 that buy/lease these annually. I would take the Merc over the Mazda if I was in the market for a new car.
@@benjaminkohl342 I strongly encourage you to watch individual reviews on both of these cars, and will wish you the best with whichever choice you make.
@@2W3X4YZ5 I'm not disagreeing with you and saying the Mercedes is more reliable then the Mazda, I'm simply saying that reliability and long term ownership are not everyone's top priorities, including my own.
@@benjaminkohl342 No problem. We all drive what we want, after all. If this were 1990 and you were trying to get me to trade my W123 in on a Mazda, I would feel the same way. It’s a matter of knowing what you have. Cheers.
compare the reliability of Mazda and Mercedes, the price, what can you buy for your buck and you will run away from Mercedes to Mazda once and forever
luxury brands are never good value compared to mainstream brands. Long term reliability doesn't really matter in a new car because most people that buy/lease them won't keep them for more than 3-6 years
@@kristians2704 I'm not sure if they are even to last 3-6 years without major hiccups for their owners. Check the market value of 10-year-old Lexus and Mercedes. So, it still matters, maybe not for everyone, but for a large number of owners for sure
@@topspot9417 reliability matters for the people who are buying them as used second-hand cars but not really for the first owner becuae all of them are reliable for the first 5,6 years
The parking brake in my Mazda 3 releases when I put it in drive and press on the accelerator pedal. At 2:40 you report that the car lurches against the parking brake for a second, why is your experience different? There is a guy on TH-cam with a Mazda 3 Turbo who mentions that the parking brake automatically releases when you put it in drive and apply pressure to the accelerator. Why do you make it seem like a whole ordeal?
Imo the Mazda looks better in the exterior and interior.
the trunk of the merc looks like an option, like something you either tick or not when specifying the car... and i am not sure which version this is
mazda looks way better
Technically it is. The hatch version was probably designed first and then they were like eh let's make a sedan too.
@ EverydayDriver... You need to redo this episode with the Mazda 3 turbo sedan to be a fair comparison.
I agree. Did I also hear him say that the A220 could do 0-60 in under 6 seconds with 188hp???
@@yvesdanjou6250 under six seconds is incorrect, the A220 does 0-60 in 7.1 seconds. It does have a lot more torque than the Mazda N/A because of the turbo. The Mercedes spec is directly from the Mercedez website. The funny thing is that the Mazda is also in the 7-second range. I think they were biased. Now, if you go price by price, the new Mazda turbo model would eat the Mercedes for breakfast. $32.600 MSRP AWD 2.5T/ 250HP/ 320 Torque
Mazda all day. Especially with the turbo.
$50k fully loaded vs $30k fully loaded. Mazda did a great job, low maintenance and economics for long run instead Mercedes. i’ll stick with mazda for long run with small budget.
we were looking at both of these cars, plus the Subaru legacy for this spring
Interesting comparo. Well done fellas. I still think the 3 sedan looks luscious and unlike many BMW's you don't have to get black seats that burn your ass.
It’s the Mazda that more people should buy. And they will.
I like the bobbed back end on the Benz. I think this will end up being a new trend. Short back-end and long hood.
The most advanced petrol engine tech alone is a good enough reason for me to get a Mazda.
Enough about the cars. Where were you guys driving? Beautiful mountain roads. Want to go there!
its in cali
@@petterderter6354, yes, that I can see. I live in California. But where. We are a big state.
Mazda 3 is definitely the winner here Great bang for buck
I have the Mercedes and would prefer that over a Mazda. I like the tech in it. Then again I’m in my 20s and plan on upgrading my car again in 6-8years