@@dylans0630 Vernacularly, yes; English will split into a series of different languages based on the common dialect of the people, but unlike Latin the English language as it is now will be known by everyone in the Anglospheric world due to universal education. Basically, every English speaker becomes bilingual with both Standard English and their new local vernacular English.
@@Blabimir cool! So modern English becomes “Formal” English. With numerous informal vernacular languages. I also imagine a form of “High” English, used by the governments of Earth, Mars, etc.
@@dylans0630 Pretty much. It's very difficult to eradicate such a profusely documented language as Modern English, which has endless numbers of dictionaries and thesauruses, both physical and digital. Another benefit that Modern English has over Latin is that English has central regulatory bodies that can control what is and what is not part of the English language, while Latin only really had the Catholic Church, which didn't really have much control of the language itself, nor did it really strive to disseminate it in its original form.
Watch "The Expanse", the first season will show you that no matter how "Advanced" humanity is, there will still be losers and winners in both capitalism and anarchism.
While a harmless joke today, yeah, I imagine when a national identity develops around the place, they might want to change it a bit, lol. It is also a little closer to how it was originally pronunced in Greek. Ouranos or Ooranos are even closer, but I just like Oranos better, and it is plausible.
@@Neatling I always imagined it would be changed to Caelus, the Roman equivalent of Uranus. This would fit in with the rest of the planets being named after Roman gods instead of Greek.
I think you should talk about how economics would work at this point as rare earth metals would be used in a special alloy and maybe each coin (in space) with its own registry chip for authenticity? I would love to see such a video.
@@MBT-BMP Yeah I think writing a series of novels based off this time period would be amazing like a massive solar system wide war between all the planet's how religion has developed, the growing threat of self thinking robots it just seems like an era ripe for story telling my immediate though is that everything in this world is too peaceful to be true lol.
A regime change in China at least seems timely as communist china that is already seeing internal pressures today would doubtfully maintain itself judging off of thousands of years of Chinese history, a new “dynasty” would emerge, I find this idea very interesting and probably more plausible I mean throughout most of Chinese history a civil war creates a new better suited regime that does well until its political system becomes too corrupt or obsolete due to changing circumstances, the CCP did an amazing job industrializing (with many Chinese citizens paying the price) but its economic system is not as conducive to services and high end manufacturing, so it is a fair assumption to say that things will change for the better with less autocratic rule or the worse with a more authoritarian government to stop the unhappy populace no longer experiencing the same level financial growth but still with limited rights
I feel like they’re under evaluated but they would probably suffer from the same problem as most current structures. There would be a lot of issues with stability, transportation would require more effort if it was under water, and depending on the materials used on the structure itself would wear down from ocean interaction faster than being on land or underground.
@@arthurbriand2175 I don't even want to watch that guy honestly, he's just a little too biased towards his favourite countries and pretty much makes any Muslim country or community either leave at once or just get assimilated and brought to the forgiveness of Christ Also his videos are highly unrealistic, sometimes it's entertaining to be honest but most of the time it's just me trying to swallow a tough pill I watched the video of him about them and honestly it's just a "what if everything went perfect for eastern rome" the difference between him and possible history is that possible history is realistic. Yes he is giving perfect conditions to a country but he at least say it out loud and add the realism elements to it. The guy is overall adviced to watch only if you're greek/Italian
@@JcoleMc if you didn't know, Muslims defeated the Byzantines and Sassanids from literally nothing. They started in the middle of the desert. Muslims took the Levant and Egypt from Byzantine in a battle in the holy land which had 300k Byzantium troops going up against 20k arabs
Personally i think Pakistan would have collapsed and most of it's territory would have been absorbed by India by the 2300s, but good scenario btw.* Also Nigeria 🇳🇬 should probably be split up into three parts by this time period.
From a sustainability standpoint, it's less suitable. You have to import all construction materials, and a floating city that can never land would require pretty high maintenance. Ealier on that is, super advanced material science allows for surface mining in the 2300s in my scenario, which will make Venus more competitive in the long run. But that is a recent development. On mercury, on the other hand, you could easily mine everything locally from the get-go. It even has water ice. Travel cost is what kept Mercury down. Its habitability is similar to that of the moon in that you need pressurized habitats, but all the resources are there. So I think it makes sense for Venus to have fewer settlers. Importing metals and sillicates from Luna is expensive.
Just a genuine mistake, this was a big project, I'm sure I've missed more errors. Originally, it was a part of the Middle Eastern administrative zone, so Beirut is a leftover from that.
3:47 Canada’s population may grow, but not due to climate change. The Canadian Shield is the reason why so few people live in areas far from the border. This area has frozen soil because of thousands of years of permafrost and cold conditions, and I don’t think that could change in only a few hundred years.
It's true for much of Canada, especially in northern Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec. But out west the Canadian shield doesn't extend as far south, there climate (the cold) is to my understanding a big factor in its low population. Regardless, having lots of arable land is no longer a factor in my scenario, with food being cultivated in super efficient factories. That, alongside warmer temperatures, makes large parts of Canada all the more habitable So I'm not saying the Canadian shield goes anywhere. Just that warmer temperatures (making life more comfortable), and the ability to grow food anywhere makes Canada a way more habitable place.
A very interesting and quite realistic view of the future of humanity and the solar system in 300 years. I must say that as with the previous video, this new sequel continues to inspire me in the writing and world building of my science fiction universe. Greetings!
Cheap antimatter production would enable relativistic interstellar travel and revolutionize in system travel time, enabling greater connectivity - Solar Union. Just thoughts for later videos. :)
You would be surprised at how fast humanity can progress, especially in a multi-polar world like the one Neatling is describing. I'll admit hundreds of millions of people on the Jovian system is ridiculous, but you could expect tens of millions at the least. I'd say the stuff described in the video is about 2400~ish rather than 2300.
@@JcoleMc It depends on how much A.I will help us develop further. And if we live 100 or 200 years longer, the probability that such population numbers will occur is higher.
@@Aleks96 and right now A.I keeps jumping to a whole nother plane of intelligence, talant and 'hard work', each season, like compare the first version of ai generataed art and the art now, such a huge sifference, especially if you train the ai model. but that's just 'art' and some artists consider it stealing, and can be controversal, but what i said is just a rate of how ai is getting better. of course since it's growing at this rate people has concern that ai can take over them and that ai can be against them like in the movies. except if we can find something so ai won't even do this and ensure they won't be against us atleast.
please do a video on what if the Semitic-speaking peoples and Semitic Languages never existed at all? alternate history plus what if Africa wasn't colonized?
It will be interesting to add biological aspect to the humans of different planets, because people living with different gravity and atmosphere will for sure affect their appearance
As Hryun Morzhov said: "Well, Nostradamus sintyaponov sang. Some people here don't remember what happened yesterday, but he wants to know what will happen the day after tomorrow. Look how smart they are. (Ps show "Put out the lights")
rarely drop a like on anything but the sequel for the space colonization series is well deserved. Would love to get a final part to make it a trilogy, theorizing about how interstellar human civilization might interact. Hard to do without invoking ftl, but maybe through a combination of generation ships as well as the anti aging medicine discussed in this video it would be possible to colonize and then have limited long distance interactions and politics between systems. Since people live for longer, an action taken 20 light years away might still impact them even if say an invasion fleet is traveling at 20% FTL and takes 80 years to arrive on a relative timescale that may be comparable to a colonial oceanic voyage in standard human lifetimes.
This is waaaay too ambitious. But a great video :) The great acceleration were driven by very specific factors in the west. Without those cogs, such as a growing young population, technological advance will slow. We probably won’t see this Solar System until the 2700s, and even that feels ambitious. It took 500 years from Columbus until a nation of the new world was truly relevant to the politics of the old. Space is a whole another ballgame. Europeans could live in the Americans. Humans cannot live on Mars, and without genetic engineering, it’s going to take a looong time before they’re close to comfortable doing so. Humanity refuses to live in Antarctica, which is far more plausible than space. If mutually assured destruction persists in this manner, humanity simply won’t make it to this reality in the video. When nuclear weapons’ use are within living memory, and only the great powers have them, it’s a stableish system. But there will always be Mormons, and ISIS, and everything else. It’s not stable at that point, with old grudges eternally brought up.
Why is natural gravity favored in these scenarios? Spin forces can make life in the vacuum as possible as other psuedo-arctic locations, limited mostly by startup import costs. The relative abundance from long supply lines by your timeline 2200s make "land" near-Earth very affordable. And near-Earth, especially low-Earth if not the surface, can be connected by a lot of criss-crossing tethers and linearly-accelerated trains that distribute force far better than our early space elevator concepts. I doubt near Earth is less populated than the Lunar surface. While I think most of us like gravity wells and stone more than vacuum, space habitats are too practical to not heavily build up. "Very high" quality of life requires synthetic nature regardless of the integrated greenery of cities; us baseline humans are a nomadic distance-runner species. Natural rocks and nature preserves are already starting to strain under mostly upper-middle-class foot traffic, and farms returned to nature also allow uniquely Earth surface unobstructed migration routes. Since I have high optimism for space settlements and layered transit systems to higher-QOL surface cities, I think the vast majority of livable surfaces orbiting Earth will be scenic nature that's easier to reach than natural wonders today. Though artificial kelp, coral, and deep peizoelectric (new!) parks are better in actual oceans like around Earth and any uninhabited ice shell moons. If we allow animal suffering in the wild, most regions will recognize Earth surface is uniquely useful as wilds. Until Venus can support buoyant continents at least. I'm also glad you gave a lot of locations their due, especially Africa. Maybe a bit low pop depending on AI and standard of 2050 living.
I imagine a lot of people live in orbital habitats. Their populations would just be included in their corrosponding state. I imagine hundreds if not thousands of giant rotating habitats orbit near earth or at the lagrange points. As for why so many still live on the celestial objects themselves, I imagined this would be the case because that's where the resources are. Yes, giant rotating habitats are affordable and make economic sense. But it's more expensive to construct one in orbit around, say Ceres, than just digging a big hole and constructing it there, in the surface. An advantage of living in/on celestial objects is also the natural radiation protection simply burying your habitat offers. Those are far from insurmountable barriers for free floating artificial habitats. It's just why i decided to have most people live on celestial objects. It has nothing to do with a preference for natural gravity, in fact many habitats dug into the surface of these objects utilize rotation to provide artificial gravity.
While I do like this video overall, and also like the previous video of the series, I think this videos point at around 9:30 is the weakest. It heavily oversimplifies the complexity of active combat operations and ignores the dangers of having warfare be like this, like conflict becoming more common because people aren’t risking their lives. And the fact that images from horizon zero dawn are being used in the background is confusing, because that game makes it very clear why having autonomous self replicating war machines is a very bad idea.
As an bhartiya Indian (planing for akhanda bharat or United bharat with taking back our land that's was divided by britsh its now in motion)seeing our own moom colonization and mining we can can say in future we not gona live our territories on planets and moon lole borders on Earth we will have borders with other on every planets and moon Bharat India will fight wars in that planets and moon and as an aspiring leader I will write down that BHARAT India should have minimum of 1000 habitable planets and as Many others moon and asteroid captial will be bharat India and rest of outer planets moon asteroid will be states of Bharat india with governer of central government with States or planets moon and systems will elect there own leadership as chief minister with multiparty system with policing and economy power but great power will be with BHARAT Central government of Bharat india Seats has to bee won in this planets moon asteroid to form an majority to form an government on Bharat Like we have now but more refined An parliamentary system spaning multipal planet moon and systems O man I created a universe What you say should i make this universe close to realistic as many others are ? Seeing that countries of earth will be ruling installer empires with there own systems and planets
the problem with indian motivation is that it's heavily rely on religious sentiment, this is not sustainable way of control in the future, just like nazi germany and israel who gaining power and try to build empire from the same exclusive sense of superiority in the end of the day it's just short term strategy and will backfire to any country who using it
Yes, there are on almost all major celestial bodies. But no permanent settlements. Most infrastructure on Europa is automated, doesn't have any humans. Living there is just too expensive with too little benefit, why move there when much less hazardous Callisto is right nearby. Burying your habitats deeply is a solution to the radiation problem, but the problem is you also have to get there, and Jupiter's radiation belt is no joke. So your ship also has to be heavily shielded. Not being able to visit the surface at all is also a big negative in terms of people settling there. Those are just the reasons in my scenario, of course. It's not impossible to visit, just expensive.
Oranos ain't a bad alt name ngl. No more butt jokes at long last. At least they didn't rename it Urectum... One of the cities being named Miyamoto cracked me up and gave me interesting visuals to put it lightly.
13:43 what would the spacesuit and walking around getting out/in of buildings look like, and everyday life be? Very interesting to have like a earth day just with a suit on out all day. Could you make a video about that?
I would have to do a lot of research to give you details on how the suits would look and function. But they would have to be well insulated, and provide oxygen, they just don't need to be pressurized relative to the outside as space suits made for vacuum. Titans' atmospheric pressure is perfect, just a little higher than Earth's, but it's not breathable and insanely cold. It's so cold you can't really handle any exposure to it. But the air pressure being just right does make some things easier. Your suit or habitat wouldn't rapidly decompress and lose air if you poked a big hole in it like in a vacuum, you would just lose heat more quickly. For safety and to minimize cost, air locks would be preferred. But there wouldn't be nearly as strict requirements, they wouldn't have to be 100% air tight. The biggest perk though is radiation protection. Even far from the sun on Pluto, you need to deal with cosmic rays. Not on Titan. The atmospheric pressure combined with the Luna-like gravity could make moving around very fun. Flapping your arms would be enough to keep you in the air for at least a little bit. A pair of wings attached to your arms, and you could probably fly around like a bird.
Love this video. Of course it’s near future, by 200 years to achieve this is, aggressive hahaha. Hopefully we make a moon base to survive the cyclical catastrophes within the seasons of the great year, but this video would be around the timeline of the 3000s maybe. I’m taking this too seriously but whatever. Would also love to see a timeline to somehow activate the core of mars, so we can get the electromagnetic field back, and we can terraform the planet. Prob around 6K AD lol. We’d prob have to move one of the exoplanets in the asteroid belt to become mars’ main moon, something big enough to keep the core/gravitational effects active, so we can maintain the magnetic field. Humanity has amazing things ahead of us. But we gotta go to the moon now.
Outside of earth, because they're not that big, all things considered, 1 government makes sense on Titan or Mars. Keep in mind, though, that they have smaller states within them, which also hold some power. It's complicated. For Earth, in reality, there are many governments as I show in my video. The UN also exists in real life. It just has more power in the future in my video. But countries like China or the US still exist and have their own governments.
I don't really agree with this as it implies the prospect of nation states still remains and there is no way that could really be done. Even if we allow confederations, federations and unitary states to exist as provinces of the world, they will ultimately be provinces with no true sense of sovereignty. Government structure is largely shaped by need more than it is by tradition as tradition can be overridden by need. 1) The North American Union would just be a larger United States not a confederation. My reasoning for this is that only early United States history and Central America and I guess you could argue Canada (however, Canada is progressing towards a more United States model) would argue in favor of confederation. Mexico and the existing United States as well as a possible future Canada would end up merging together under the same system given it is similar enough to allow this. The three of them together would be too much for the smaller countries to balance even if they band together. I do see there being seven divisions in this greater federation largely because I don't see how Alaska remains tied to the 48 when it has its own secession movement which would only get stronger just to separate from the 48 if they joined a larger federation. The argument for staying as the 49 (given Hawaii leave there are no additional states) would just not exist. I also don't see how Europe retains Greenland if Europe and North America are political tied together even as a loose confederation. United States clearly wants Greenland, the native population would have no interest in staying, and even if more people enter, most of them are probably from the continental United States which are likely to push Greenland further towards annexation into the North American Union. I even see Iceland going this same route as being part of Europe is mostly just cultural. Iceland is far closer to Greenland than it is to Europe, minus the Faroe Islands which isn't even that much of a factor given that Iceland is located on both the European and North American Plates making it a decision needed for Iceland to make. If Iceland is meant to retain its independence, given European integration, then it is likely they'll favor integration into the North American Union as the North American Union is likely to be Richer and a better geographic location to maintain trade and the Icelandic way of life as North Americans are likely to be more libertarian than Europeans. Central America would become a union, although probably more Canada. I do not see Central America being a unitary state or a solid confederation in itself. Just for political purposes (which is also the chief reason they are apart) would they even form a union, even a loose one. By the way, they kind of already do as SICA. So its actual components would be Americana (the 48 states, although I think DC and Upstate New York, probably named Rooseveltia after the two presidents, would help bring that back to 50, upstate New York is the only doable division and almost every New Yorker I think agrees with), Canada (hopefully with a different mentality towards their Southern Brothers), Alaska, the Nord-Arctic Islands (Iceland and Greenland), Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean. That is seven. The capital is more likely to remain in Washington DC. I don't see it moving, especially with the inclusion of the Nord-Arctic Islands and Alaska being its own constituent part of the NAU. 2) South American Administrative Zone would probably be a confederation as there is already the Union of South American Nations. Its continuation and merger with Mercosul and Andean Community, which is likely to happen after the North American Union is formed. The reason why it hasn't is because of the U.S. rivalry with Brazil and that is only due to comparable size. If the North American Union is formed, it would probably more than double (eventually) the influence the United States has had by its self and that would make Brazil too insignificant to be any issue. It would just fall under its influence and make South America as whole one big satellite area. For this reason, I can see the South American Administrative Zone becoming a South American Confederacy, although it can also be called the South American Union just with a confederacy rather than federal model of governance. 3) I do agree mostly with the European Administrative Zone, but it is likely to be a multifaceted and multilevel political dynamic due to the differences in shared and divergent interests between all regional entities. C-F-word would give it too much credit. However, I don't see Russia being divergent from it, at least not Western Russia. The fall of Russia is inevitable since Russia cannot manage itself and China would rather deal with a weaker broken up Russia since it can play games against its enemies which it prefers. It wouldn't want them to have nuclear weapons, but it would also not want Russia to continue with its nuclear arsenal either. By the way, I don't think Russia has any operable nukes, either sold them or they have degraded over time to be not a real issue. Russia has no real reason to say it would nuke Ukraine or the West if they get involved, since just having them is a deterrence. I do also think it would include Kurdistan and Turkey will eventually give it up. Today's Turks are much less in favor of suppressing the Kurdish identity and prefer a binational union or at least the ones 35 years old and younger. They still want sovereignty over Kurdish lands, but they don't want a solid ethno-state. I do see both Turkey and Kurdistan becoming part of this European project with Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and again much of Western Russia. 4) The Middle-Eastern Administrative Zone would just become the Semitic Union or the Semitic League which would be somewhat between an Administrative Zone and a Confederation if such could be believed. In many ways it would be a confederation, but it would also be an administrative zone similar to Europe. Just that its complexities are less observed. This is mostly due to Israel but also Yemen to some extent as well as in Iraq between the Sunnis and Shi'ites. There is enough complexity to make it less centralized that a confederation similar to again, Europe. However, the extent of complexity beyond a confederation is largely seen in Yemen and Israel. By the way, I don't see Palestine continuing to exist except as maybe a rebuilt Gaza. Too many land is taken from the West Bank Palestinians and the settlers are never going to leave making the dreams of a United West Bank itself very much unlikely. The best we could see is that Gaza is rebuilt, hopefully and becomes an Arab Monaco, while the West Bank is integrated with the Arabs somehow becoming Israeli citizens, probably by some means in which people are more free to decide their own religion lack thereof, with it being understood that Judaism is a religion and anyone who converts to it is allowed to be a citizen. Palestinians are likely to take it if it means a better standard of living and so there you go. The fact that Palestinians are not willing to convert but willing to attack Israel because of how bad their conditions are is just weird. Conversion has happened even from Christian to Muslim with far less problems than this. This is much more like Rome with the animosity that used to exist between Pagans and Christians. Only that Jews and Muslims do not possess that historical animosity and they are both Abrahamic faiths making it weird. I also see the Lebanese diaspora returning back to Lebanon and kicking Hezbollah out. There are 4 million people in Lebanon, 14 million people living practically as exiles from their homeland, not due to Israel, but due to Hezbollah and Palestinian militants (who were kicked by Israel and Lebanese supporters, which led to Hezbollah's existence). I do see the Gulf Union becoming a reality. I do not at all see how the Houthis becoming part of Saudi Arabia whether becoming secular or not. I don't even see the Semitic League being semitic beyond just a tolerance between Judaism, Islam, Christianity, and Druze with selective tolerance to the non-religious chiefly seen in Lebanon, Egypt, Syria and Israel. Again a mixed system between an Administrative zone and a confederation.
5) Maghreb Union is more likely to be a Federation. There isn't really any reason for it to be so decentralized. I don't see it becoming a unitary state. So it is likely to be an Arab Muslim North American Union entity in North Africa. 6) Eurasian Administrative Zone. Mmm... If Western Russia is annexed into Europe, which is what I see as its future after Putin is gone, it is more likely to become a Siberian Administrative Zone headed in a bipolar loose association between Kazakhstan and Mongolia. So expect something much closer to what you had said about South America. 7) Central Asian Administrative Zone probably would exist as you had said, but I don't see Qatar and Bahrain being a part of it, especially after Iran and Pakistan fall. I don't even think Pakistan would exist. There would be too much bad blood or animosity between these people to ever form a union. So it would be an Administrative zone that exists just for trade and administrative purpose for the region before the World Government. Mostly agree. 8) People's Republic of China would not exist at this time given Chinese history and China's current state. It would definitely decline and as it declines with the population it currently has, people would be eager to go their own way, so it is likely if China re-emerged it would just be a confederation. Also, I don't see how East Asia and China remain separate. It is more likely to be something similar to Europe in which various intermingling would exist making it overall an Administrative zone but with probably similar complexity as Europe, largely because I don't see how anything different would exist between Korea and Japan. I believe this would be called the East Asian Administrative Zone. 9) No substantive change for ASEAN. Pretty much spot on, although Indonesia is likely to fall apart which would lead to a more complex ASEAN, still confederacy is the most likely outcome and progression of such. 10) Oceanian Administrative Zone is more likely to become a Confederation given the overlap of shared history, commercial activity and politics. So probably the United Oceanic League or the United Oceanic Confederation. It depends on a few factors going either way. 11) South Asian Administrative Zone. Yep. Absolutely no change, whatsoever. 12) West African Administrative Zone. Yep. 13) East African Administrative Zone. Yep. 14) Middle African Administrative Zone. Yep. 15) Southern African Administrative Zone. Yep. 16) United Territories of Antarctica. I would probably call it the United Cantons of Antarctica, which are more likely to function as a confederation as they are just domed cities with a lot of open land making integration further quite unrealistic and unnecessary since being a bunch of domed city makes much of the necessities of centralized administration unnecessary. 17) I do think underwater colonization would occur as it is the next step before colonizing the atmosphere with floating cities and eventually space. I do think floating cities within the atmosphere and not in space are likely to become extensions of regional entities like Americana. Probably the Free Association of Subnautica (referring to being under water). You can use your imagination but it would probably consist of settlements on the ocean floor with some floating colonies between the ocean floor and the surface as well as some floating on the surface. I believe Subnautica would band together more eagerly in a very loose political arrangement as would want to remain independent from the surface and the territorial waters of each surface nation, then again I probably like Aquaman from DC a little too much. Consider Subnautica either be really, really libertarian or really, really racist-fascist or somewhat between.
18) Space colonies. There are regions of space ideal for orbital stations with colonial habitations which I feel are necessary as infrastructure to support transportation, commerce and certainly administration of a solar system spanning system. Probably as the Administrative Zone of Geospace Satellites. 19) Luna Council, only that it is more likely to be a confederation as what happened to Antarctica. Domed cities that are pretty much isolated from each other. Even if they are underground, it wouldn't be likely that such a body would have anything more a confederation structure of government. So that is the 19 Administrative Zones of the United Nations of Earth and Luna. I do agree with Mercury and Venus unless they become terraformed would just become Territorial extensions of the UNEL, probably referred to as Planetary Territories rather than as Territories as they are likely divided into territorial zones. I don't see Mars becoming a federation simply for the same reasons as Antarctica. So maybe the Martian Confederation would be better. Ceres is likely to involve many settlements on various Asteroids, so I see more of an Asymmetrical Federation which is somewhat between a true federation and a unitary state. Still Ceres Collective is a good name for it. Jovian Commonwealth? Eh... Maybe. Jovian League more likely and probably as a confederation. I can see how Callisto could dominate it, but at the same time the technology needed to colonize it would allow colonization of the other moons. Io would be a territory and Europe an Antarctica in space, but Ganymede is almost the same as Callisto. Union of Titan and the Saturnian System? I guess. I don't really see it any way except Titan and the others just being administrative zones tied to it, ultimately being a federation, although probably Asymmetrical like Ceres. United Moons of Uranus/Ouranos. This I could see becoming a commonwealth which is a semi-autonomous confederation tied to Earth+Luna, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn/Titan. It is in a similar boat as Canada and Australia in which much of its government is locally elected but the crucial components tied to administrative functions are appointed by the big four with the fifth uniting executive probably decided by all four in unison with the inhabitants of each moon. Each moon still operates semi-autonomous itself from the association/commonwealth. Neptune Sovereignty of Triton would probably be a unitary state if any should exist, but I sincerely doubt it. It depends on how settlements function on the moon. It is likely by the time humans colonize here and given its size, there might just be one colonize complex which could central authority enough in itself, but with some devolved authority to satellite colonies across its surface. State of Pluto and Charon, Federation. Same thing as Triton but as a federation between Pluto and its moon. There would probably be more of these Unitary or Federation entities in the Kuiper Belt. Persephone Outposts. Yep. But it exists for two reason, not just advancing deep space colonization but also exploration into other solar systems.
I distinctly remember being in the process of deciding whether it should just be Tehran or some compromise city, then for whatever reason I moved on before I had decided. So I actually don't know yet, I don't want to make a snap decision. I am going to post the administrative zone on r/imaginarymaps on reddit at some point, and will have decided by then. But likely Tehran, possibly some compromise city.
hmmm i wonder how terraforming would be tackmed and when (korzgesagt gave very interesting and quick solutions, but very expensive and powerful, and would probably need control of jovian moons)
@@Terranallias18 No it's fucking not. We can't even get to the moon in the next ten years, let alone fucking Mars, no there's not gonna be civilization on Mars for millenniums
This is an optimistic scenario. But I mean we did visit the moon in the 60s, and 300 years ago, we hadn't even set foot on Antarctica or gone through the industrial revolution. A lot can happen in 300 years. So yeah, I think it's possible, I lay out my reasons for thinking so in more detail in part 1. The reason we aren't doing more in space right now is not because we can't, but because it isn't a priority, Nasa's budget is not very big and has been shrinking for decades. But China's space agency is catching up in terms of funding, and I think that will push the US to finally focus more on space exploration again so China doesn't outshine the US.
@@Neatling there's a progress Plateau though. There's a reason why we haven't gotten data storage or processors that are the same size but have a higher capacity and that's because we're bumping up against physical limits. And it's not one to one analogous but we're doing the same thing with space. We're not going to be on Mars in 300 years. Not any permanent capacity I can guarantee you that and certainly not Titan
Shouldn't Antarctica have a higher population? (or even the oceans) If settlement on the other planets and Luna have been achieved Antarctica should be nigh infinitely easier?
I hope Venus gets some terraforming love next episode! I wonder if Mercury will stand the test of time and not be deleted for a eventual dyson swarm lol
I think Britain would have split up and its own zone, and I think the EU would probably be a HRE style zone, and because of the rising Monarchism, I think there would be more Monarchies
Yeah it likely has some deposits, that's what I imagined would sustain its population. I just meant relative to the rest of the solar system. The biggest factor in its low population is simply how expensive going there is in terms of Delta-V. That is not a problem in the 2300s due to super efficient fusion powered propulsion, but it was in previous centuries.
Not quite, it's more of a standstill. Ukraine eventually joins NATO and the EU, exactly what Russia wants to avoid. The war ends in a standstill along the frontline similar to the Korean war, with no official redrawing of the border, but with the frontline becoming the border in practice. But keep in mind that this is entirely speculative and fiction.
A 300 year old stand still? Russia is a decaying power it doesn't have a chance to remain what's is it more than Portuguese or Spanish conquerors have to be in the 1600 from to 1900 .
Seems like a pretty hopefull future. 😊 I don't think congo is gonna survive as one state. Probably split into two or 3 countries, with no cenral african block. Angola being part of the southern block and possibly the south of congo. With the rest being split between east and west africa. I also don't think china will get sakhalin. I think Japan would sieze it, if china started to take back manchuria.
Politics, countries, flags, space colonisation and New technologies? You crushed it this time! ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Yes! I wanted a sequel
Me too
I think it should be a series.
@@furnaceheadgames9001 agreed
the space video,s are the best !
True
Honey wake up, The greatest alt history TH-camr posted a video
The bees woke up
Man nice to see that English truly has become the universal language
Agreed 🇺🇸🇬🇧🏴 ❤🤍💙
It’ll probably split up into different languages, like Latin.
@@dylans0630 Vernacularly, yes; English will split into a series of different languages based on the common dialect of the people, but unlike Latin the English language as it is now will be known by everyone in the Anglospheric world due to universal education. Basically, every English speaker becomes bilingual with both Standard English and their new local vernacular English.
@@Blabimir cool! So modern English becomes “Formal” English. With numerous informal vernacular languages. I also imagine a form of “High” English, used by the governments of Earth, Mars, etc.
@@dylans0630 Pretty much. It's very difficult to eradicate such a profusely documented language as Modern English, which has endless numbers of dictionaries and thesauruses, both physical and digital. Another benefit that Modern English has over Latin is that English has central regulatory bodies that can control what is and what is not part of the English language, while Latin only really had the Catholic Church, which didn't really have much control of the language itself, nor did it really strive to disseminate it in its original form.
Okay. Now I want to live in a world like this
wtf? This is dystopian as hell
You mean world"s"?
Watch "The Expanse", the first season will show you that no matter how "Advanced" humanity is, there will still be losers and winners in both capitalism and anarchism.
I refuse to eat fake, artificial meat and plants.
But there’s no more war :[
i like how the people of uranus have decided to just rename their planet
While a harmless joke today, yeah, I imagine when a national identity develops around the place, they might want to change it a bit, lol. It is also a little closer to how it was originally pronunced in Greek. Ouranos or Ooranos are even closer, but I just like Oranos better, and it is plausible.
@@Neatling I always imagined it would be changed to Caelus, the Roman equivalent of Uranus. This would fit in with the rest of the planets being named after Roman gods instead of Greek.
1: Neatling
2: Who?
1:He is back
2: who
There's a book series call The Red Rising that explores the concept of a planetary civilization.
The sequel we all needed
Plss do more of this🙏🙏🙏
I plan on continuing the series
@Neatling I love this series and your channel and I hope to wait shorter than 7 months but I understand that this content needs its time
I think you should talk about how economics would work at this point as rare earth metals would be used in a special alloy and maybe each coin (in space) with its own registry chip for authenticity? I would love to see such a video.
I dont know why but now I want to see a scenario where all of this falls apart into war just for the hell of it.
Fr though
@@MBT-BMP Yeah I think writing a series of novels based off this time period would be amazing like a massive solar system wide war between all the planet's how religion has developed, the growing threat of self thinking robots it just seems like an era ripe for story telling my immediate though is that everything in this world is too peaceful to be true lol.
@@charlieross6586 That's genius
@@charlieross6586 I might ask ChatGPT to write me some ngl
A regime change in China at least seems timely as communist china that is already seeing internal pressures today would doubtfully maintain itself judging off of thousands of years of Chinese history, a new “dynasty” would emerge, I find this idea very interesting and probably more plausible
I mean throughout most of Chinese history a civil war creates a new better suited regime that does well until its political system becomes too corrupt or obsolete due to changing circumstances, the CCP did an amazing job industrializing (with many Chinese citizens paying the price) but its economic system is not as conducive to services and high end manufacturing, so it is a fair assumption to say that things will change for the better with less autocratic rule or the worse with a more authoritarian government to stop the unhappy populace no longer experiencing the same level financial growth but still with limited rights
Ocean habitats are definitely a major possibility in the future, maybe an under evaluated option
I feel like they’re under evaluated but they would probably suffer from the same problem as most current structures. There would be a lot of issues with stability, transportation would require more effort if it was under water, and depending on the materials used on the structure itself would wear down from ocean interaction faster than being on land or underground.
Best way to end the weekend before I go to school and continue to fight for honor roll 😊
I got honor role! update ☺️
might be one of your best videos yet, I keep finding small little details and it makes me so pleased to see
keep up the awesome work
This is so hype, can't wait for the next one!
Do a what if the vandal kingdom survived and please don't be biased just because they're Christians 🙏
I think Videntis did a video about this.
@@arthurbriand2175 I don't even want to watch that guy honestly, he's just a little too biased towards his favourite countries and pretty much makes any Muslim country or community either leave at once or just get assimilated and brought to the forgiveness of Christ
Also his videos are highly unrealistic, sometimes it's entertaining to be honest but most of the time it's just me trying to swallow a tough pill
I watched the video of him about them and honestly it's just a "what if everything went perfect for eastern rome" the difference between him and possible history is that possible history is realistic. Yes he is giving perfect conditions to a country but he at least say it out loud and add the realism elements to it.
The guy is overall adviced to watch only if you're greek/Italian
@@Respecteddude666 Well yeah Christanity had about a 500 year + head start on islam so of course the cultures that worship it are more refined .
@@Respecteddude666Only watching videntis if you are greek or italian is the realest thing i heard about him ngl
@@JcoleMc if you didn't know, Muslims defeated the Byzantines and Sassanids from literally nothing. They started in the middle of the desert.
Muslims took the Levant and Egypt from Byzantine in a battle in the holy land which had 300k Byzantium troops going up against 20k arabs
incredible. Very well done, had me fully immersed.
Personally i think Pakistan would have collapsed and most of it's territory would have been absorbed by India by the 2300s, but good scenario btw.* Also Nigeria 🇳🇬 should probably be split up into three parts by this time period.
AMAZINGNES!!! So much great detail and thougt for history!!! So cool!!! Great work!!!
Venus having less people than Mercury is insane. It's much more habitable and closer
From a sustainability standpoint, it's less suitable. You have to import all construction materials, and a floating city that can never land would require pretty high maintenance. Ealier on that is, super advanced material science allows for surface mining in the 2300s in my scenario, which will make Venus more competitive in the long run. But that is a recent development.
On mercury, on the other hand, you could easily mine everything locally from the get-go. It even has water ice.
Travel cost is what kept Mercury down. Its habitability is similar to that of the moon in that you need pressurized habitats, but all the resources are there.
So I think it makes sense for Venus to have fewer settlers. Importing metals and sillicates from Luna is expensive.
By 2300, I definitely think mahgrebi arabic will have become its own recognized language
Makes sense
Being nitpicky but the capital of Central Asia is shown as Beirut
Just a genuine mistake, this was a big project, I'm sure I've missed more errors. Originally, it was a part of the Middle Eastern administrative zone, so Beirut is a leftover from that.
@@Neatling love your work
You need do:What if the Angevin empire survived.
3:47 Canada’s population may grow, but not due to climate change. The Canadian Shield is the reason why so few people live in areas far from the border. This area has frozen soil because of thousands of years of permafrost and cold conditions, and I don’t think that could change in only a few hundred years.
It's true for much of Canada, especially in northern Manitoba, Ontario and Quebec. But out west the Canadian shield doesn't extend as far south, there climate (the cold) is to my understanding a big factor in its low population.
Regardless, having lots of arable land is no longer a factor in my scenario, with food being cultivated in super efficient factories. That, alongside warmer temperatures, makes large parts of Canada all the more habitable
So I'm not saying the Canadian shield goes anywhere. Just that warmer temperatures (making life more comfortable), and the ability to grow food anywhere makes Canada a way more habitable place.
@@Neatling Oh okay, thanks for clarifying! I completely forgot about the west lol 😅
holy shit this is high quality Great job man
HOLY CRAP WE NEEEED MOREEEEE
Keep making space videos your onto something
A very interesting and quite realistic view of the future of humanity and the solar system in 300 years.
I must say that as with the previous video, this new sequel continues to inspire me in the writing and world building of my science fiction universe. Greetings!
WE'RE BLESSED! A NEW VIDEO OF THIS GORGEOUS SERIES!!!;🎉
Damn, very good video
Cheap antimatter production would enable relativistic interstellar travel and revolutionize in system travel time, enabling greater connectivity - Solar Union.
Just thoughts for later videos. :)
Awesome video 😊.
Omg the goat is back!!!
Amazing video!
I like the city good for a Sci fi show
i love this sequel
I love this so much! Do you think you could do more videos further into the future or something?
Just after I finished my solar system tattoos, guess I'll need to update it with the neatling lore
W video
Dang I got this video recommended on TikTok fyp and TH-cam fyp
i hope this will be better
it did not disappoint, i like the reference to planet 9 in the end
Felt like I was hallucinating at 15:20
This feels more like A HOI mod then a acctual forecast of the future , I do not see any of this happening in just 300 years .
You would be surprised at how fast humanity can progress, especially in a multi-polar world like the one Neatling is describing. I'll admit hundreds of millions of people on the Jovian system is ridiculous, but you could expect tens of millions at the least.
I'd say the stuff described in the video is about 2400~ish rather than 2300.
@@Darkness-yn5us I'd say this more year 3,000 to 3200 ,
@@JcoleMc It depends on how much A.I will help us develop further. And if we live 100 or 200 years longer, the probability that such population numbers will occur is higher.
@@Aleks96 and right now A.I keeps jumping to a whole nother plane of intelligence, talant and 'hard work', each season, like compare the first version of ai generataed art and the art now, such a huge sifference, especially if you train the ai model. but that's just 'art' and some artists consider it stealing, and can be controversal, but what i said is just a rate of how ai is getting better. of course since it's growing at this rate people has concern that ai can take over them and that ai can be against them like in the movies. except if we can find something so ai won't even do this and ensure they won't be against us atleast.
This was a fun one! While I doubt it works out this way, I love hearing the speculation. Thank you.
God be with you out there, everybody. ✝️ :)
Hello, i´m writing from Avalon. The algae here are really good. I could eat sushi all day.
please do a video on what if the Semitic-speaking peoples and Semitic Languages never existed at all? alternate history plus what if Africa wasn't colonized?
It will be interesting to add biological aspect to the humans of different planets, because people living with different gravity and atmosphere will for sure affect their appearance
I have to say it seems like it's possible this could happen in the near future.
As Hryun Morzhov said: "Well, Nostradamus sintyaponov sang. Some people here don't remember what happened yesterday, but he wants to know what will happen the day after tomorrow. Look how smart they are. (Ps show "Put out the lights")
Thanks man
Can you tell us what source did you get the flags from?
Please consider making a part two video on what if Islam never existed focusing more** on Southeast Asia, China and South Asia this time.....
This is good dude I think I'm in love 😘❤
Looks like Neatling agrees with those who believe the Darien Gap makes most ideal border. I saw this myself, but I am glad someone else sees it.
SEATBELTS EVERYONE! NEW SPACE VIDEO DROPPED
It sound like just like world in Expans by James S.A Corney. And what world Look like before series started
rarely drop a like on anything but the sequel for the space colonization series is well deserved. Would love to get a final part to make it a trilogy, theorizing about how interstellar human civilization might interact. Hard to do without invoking ftl, but maybe through a combination of generation ships as well as the anti aging medicine discussed in this video it would be possible to colonize and then have limited long distance interactions and politics between systems. Since people live for longer, an action taken 20 light years away might still impact them even if say an invasion fleet is traveling at 20% FTL and takes 80 years to arrive on a relative timescale that may be comparable to a colonial oceanic voyage in standard human lifetimes.
In the grim dark future of the 41st Millennium…
Please make a part two video on what if Islam never existed focusing more** on Southeast Asia, China and South Asia...
Please make a part two video on what if Islam never existed focusing more** on Southeast Asia, China and South Asia...*
Can you also include terraforming
Here from Reddit
This is waaaay too ambitious. But a great video :) The great acceleration were driven by very specific factors in the west. Without those cogs, such as a growing young population, technological advance will slow. We probably won’t see this Solar System until the 2700s, and even that feels ambitious. It took 500 years from Columbus until a nation of the new world was truly relevant to the politics of the old. Space is a whole another ballgame. Europeans could live in the Americans. Humans cannot live on Mars, and without genetic engineering, it’s going to take a looong time before they’re close to comfortable doing so. Humanity refuses to live in Antarctica, which is far more plausible than space. If mutually assured destruction persists in this manner, humanity simply won’t make it to this reality in the video. When nuclear weapons’ use are within living memory, and only the great powers have them, it’s a stableish system. But there will always be Mormons, and ISIS, and everything else. It’s not stable at that point, with old grudges eternally brought up.
Why is natural gravity favored in these scenarios? Spin forces can make life in the vacuum as possible as other psuedo-arctic locations, limited mostly by startup import costs. The relative abundance from long supply lines by your timeline 2200s make "land" near-Earth very affordable. And near-Earth, especially low-Earth if not the surface, can be connected by a lot of criss-crossing tethers and linearly-accelerated trains that distribute force far better than our early space elevator concepts. I doubt near Earth is less populated than the Lunar surface. While I think most of us like gravity wells and stone more than vacuum, space habitats are too practical to not heavily build up.
"Very high" quality of life requires synthetic nature regardless of the integrated greenery of cities; us baseline humans are a nomadic distance-runner species. Natural rocks and nature preserves are already starting to strain under mostly upper-middle-class foot traffic, and farms returned to nature also allow uniquely Earth surface unobstructed migration routes.
Since I have high optimism for space settlements and layered transit systems to higher-QOL surface cities, I think the vast majority of livable surfaces orbiting Earth will be scenic nature that's easier to reach than natural wonders today. Though artificial kelp, coral, and deep peizoelectric (new!) parks are better in actual oceans like around Earth and any uninhabited ice shell moons. If we allow animal suffering in the wild, most regions will recognize Earth surface is uniquely useful as wilds. Until Venus can support buoyant continents at least.
I'm also glad you gave a lot of locations their due, especially Africa. Maybe a bit low pop depending on AI and standard of 2050 living.
I imagine a lot of people live in orbital habitats. Their populations would just be included in their corrosponding state. I imagine hundreds if not thousands of giant rotating habitats orbit near earth or at the lagrange points.
As for why so many still live on the celestial objects themselves, I imagined this would be the case because that's where the resources are. Yes, giant rotating habitats are affordable and make economic sense. But it's more expensive to construct one in orbit around, say Ceres, than just digging a big hole and constructing it there, in the surface.
An advantage of living in/on celestial objects is also the natural radiation protection simply burying your habitat offers.
Those are far from insurmountable barriers for free floating artificial habitats. It's just why i decided to have most people live on celestial objects. It has nothing to do with a preference for natural gravity, in fact many habitats dug into the surface of these objects utilize rotation to provide artificial gravity.
While I do like this video overall, and also like the previous video of the series, I think this videos point at around 9:30 is the weakest. It heavily oversimplifies the complexity of active combat operations and ignores the dangers of having warfare be like this, like conflict becoming more common because people aren’t risking their lives. And the fact that images from horizon zero dawn are being used in the background is confusing, because that game makes it very clear why having autonomous self replicating war machines is a very bad idea.
write this into a novel
As an bhartiya Indian (planing for akhanda bharat or United bharat with taking back our land that's was divided by britsh its now in motion)seeing our own moom colonization and mining we can can say in future we not gona live our territories on planets and moon lole borders on Earth we will have borders with other on every planets and moon
Bharat India will fight wars in that planets and moon and as an aspiring leader
I will write down that BHARAT India should have minimum of 1000 habitable planets and as Many others moon and asteroid captial will be bharat India and rest of outer planets moon asteroid will be states of Bharat india with governer of central government with States or planets moon and systems will elect there own leadership as chief minister with multiparty system with policing and economy power but great power will be with BHARAT Central government of Bharat india
Seats has to bee won in this planets moon asteroid to form an majority to form an government on Bharat
Like we have now but more refined
An parliamentary system spaning multipal planet moon and systems
O man I created a universe
What you say should i make this universe close to realistic as many others are ?
Seeing that countries of earth will be ruling installer empires with there own systems and planets
the problem with indian motivation is that it's heavily rely on religious sentiment, this is not sustainable way of control in the future, just like nazi germany and israel who gaining power and try to build empire from the same exclusive sense of superiority in the end of the day it's just short term strategy and will backfire to any country who using it
Are there at least scientific settlements on Europa?
Yes, there are on almost all major celestial bodies. But no permanent settlements. Most infrastructure on Europa is automated, doesn't have any humans. Living there is just too expensive with too little benefit, why move there when much less hazardous Callisto is right nearby. Burying your habitats deeply is a solution to the radiation problem, but the problem is you also have to get there, and Jupiter's radiation belt is no joke. So your ship also has to be heavily shielded. Not being able to visit the surface at all is also a big negative in terms of people settling there. Those are just the reasons in my scenario, of course. It's not impossible to visit, just expensive.
@@Neatling Alright.
Scientists settlements seem very likely if Europa has alien life, but it's not gonna be a permanent settlement probably due to the radiation.
Oranus to get around the name of Uranus is crazy
Oranos ain't a bad alt name ngl. No more butt jokes at long last. At least they didn't rename it Urectum...
One of the cities being named Miyamoto cracked me up and gave me interesting visuals to put it lightly.
_(Names city on Venus "Laputa.")_
I see what you did there.
Also Planet 9 irl is crazy lol.
Why isn't there nore engagement on this?
13:43 what would the spacesuit and walking around getting out/in of buildings look like, and everyday life be? Very interesting to have like a earth day just with a suit on out all day. Could you make a video about that?
I would have to do a lot of research to give you details on how the suits would look and function. But they would have to be well insulated, and provide oxygen, they just don't need to be pressurized relative to the outside as space suits made for vacuum. Titans' atmospheric pressure is perfect, just a little higher than Earth's, but it's not breathable and insanely cold. It's so cold you can't really handle any exposure to it.
But the air pressure being just right does make some things easier. Your suit or habitat wouldn't rapidly decompress and lose air if you poked a big hole in it like in a vacuum, you would just lose heat more quickly. For safety and to minimize cost, air locks would be preferred. But there wouldn't be nearly as strict requirements, they wouldn't have to be 100% air tight. The biggest perk though is radiation protection. Even far from the sun on Pluto, you need to deal with cosmic rays. Not on Titan.
The atmospheric pressure combined with the Luna-like gravity could make moving around very fun. Flapping your arms would be enough to keep you in the air for at least a little bit. A pair of wings attached to your arms, and you could probably fly around like a bird.
What if Egypt had a empire
So, the expanse?:D
Love this video. Of course it’s near future, by 200 years to achieve this is, aggressive hahaha. Hopefully we make a moon base to survive the cyclical catastrophes within the seasons of the great year, but this video would be around the timeline of the 3000s maybe. I’m taking this too seriously but whatever. Would also love to see a timeline to somehow activate the core of mars, so we can get the electromagnetic field back, and we can terraform the planet. Prob around 6K AD lol. We’d prob have to move one of the exoplanets in the asteroid belt to become mars’ main moon, something big enough to keep the core/gravitational effects active, so we can maintain the magnetic field. Humanity has amazing things ahead of us. But we gotta go to the moon now.
Me like👍
Question, why is there one government per planet
Outside of earth, because they're not that big, all things considered, 1 government makes sense on Titan or Mars. Keep in mind, though, that they have smaller states within them, which also hold some power. It's complicated.
For Earth, in reality, there are many governments as I show in my video. The UN also exists in real life. It just has more power in the future in my video. But countries like China or the US still exist and have their own governments.
I don't really agree with this as it implies the prospect of nation states still remains and there is no way that could really be done. Even if we allow confederations, federations and unitary states to exist as provinces of the world, they will ultimately be provinces with no true sense of sovereignty.
Government structure is largely shaped by need more than it is by tradition as tradition can be overridden by need.
1) The North American Union would just be a larger United States not a confederation. My reasoning for this is that only early United States history and Central America and I guess you could argue Canada (however, Canada is progressing towards a more United States model) would argue in favor of confederation. Mexico and the existing United States as well as a possible future Canada would end up merging together under the same system given it is similar enough to allow this. The three of them together would be too much for the smaller countries to balance even if they band together. I do see there being seven divisions in this greater federation largely because I don't see how Alaska remains tied to the 48 when it has its own secession movement which would only get stronger just to separate from the 48 if they joined a larger federation. The argument for staying as the 49 (given Hawaii leave there are no additional states) would just not exist. I also don't see how Europe retains Greenland if Europe and North America are political tied together even as a loose confederation. United States clearly wants Greenland, the native population would have no interest in staying, and even if more people enter, most of them are probably from the continental United States which are likely to push Greenland further towards annexation into the North American Union. I even see Iceland going this same route as being part of Europe is mostly just cultural. Iceland is far closer to Greenland than it is to Europe, minus the Faroe Islands which isn't even that much of a factor given that Iceland is located on both the European and North American Plates making it a decision needed for Iceland to make. If Iceland is meant to retain its independence, given European integration, then it is likely they'll favor integration into the North American Union as the North American Union is likely to be Richer and a better geographic location to maintain trade and the Icelandic way of life as North Americans are likely to be more libertarian than Europeans. Central America would become a union, although probably more Canada. I do not see Central America being a unitary state or a solid confederation in itself. Just for political purposes (which is also the chief reason they are apart) would they even form a union, even a loose one. By the way, they kind of already do as SICA.
So its actual components would be Americana (the 48 states, although I think DC and Upstate New York, probably named Rooseveltia after the two presidents, would help bring that back to 50, upstate New York is the only doable division and almost every New Yorker I think agrees with), Canada (hopefully with a different mentality towards their Southern Brothers), Alaska, the Nord-Arctic Islands (Iceland and Greenland), Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean. That is seven. The capital is more likely to remain in Washington DC. I don't see it moving, especially with the inclusion of the Nord-Arctic Islands and Alaska being its own constituent part of the NAU.
2) South American Administrative Zone would probably be a confederation as there is already the Union of South American Nations. Its continuation and merger with Mercosul and Andean Community, which is likely to happen after the North American Union is formed. The reason why it hasn't is because of the U.S. rivalry with Brazil and that is only due to comparable size. If the North American Union is formed, it would probably more than double (eventually) the influence the United States has had by its self and that would make Brazil too insignificant to be any issue. It would just fall under its influence and make South America as whole one big satellite area. For this reason, I can see the South American Administrative Zone becoming a South American Confederacy, although it can also be called the South American Union just with a confederacy rather than federal model of governance.
3) I do agree mostly with the European Administrative Zone, but it is likely to be a multifaceted and multilevel political dynamic due to the differences in shared and divergent interests between all regional entities. C-F-word would give it too much credit. However, I don't see Russia being divergent from it, at least not Western Russia. The fall of Russia is inevitable since Russia cannot manage itself and China would rather deal with a weaker broken up Russia since it can play games against its enemies which it prefers. It wouldn't want them to have nuclear weapons, but it would also not want Russia to continue with its nuclear arsenal either. By the way, I don't think Russia has any operable nukes, either sold them or they have degraded over time to be not a real issue. Russia has no real reason to say it would nuke Ukraine or the West if they get involved, since just having them is a deterrence. I do also think it would include Kurdistan and Turkey will eventually give it up. Today's Turks are much less in favor of suppressing the Kurdish identity and prefer a binational union or at least the ones 35 years old and younger. They still want sovereignty over Kurdish lands, but they don't want a solid ethno-state. I do see both Turkey and Kurdistan becoming part of this European project with Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia and again much of Western Russia.
4) The Middle-Eastern Administrative Zone would just become the Semitic Union or the Semitic League which would be somewhat between an Administrative Zone and a Confederation if such could be believed. In many ways it would be a confederation, but it would also be an administrative zone similar to Europe. Just that its complexities are less observed. This is mostly due to Israel but also Yemen to some extent as well as in Iraq between the Sunnis and Shi'ites. There is enough complexity to make it less centralized that a confederation similar to again, Europe. However, the extent of complexity beyond a confederation is largely seen in Yemen and Israel. By the way, I don't see Palestine continuing to exist except as maybe a rebuilt Gaza. Too many land is taken from the West Bank Palestinians and the settlers are never going to leave making the dreams of a United West Bank itself very much unlikely. The best we could see is that Gaza is rebuilt, hopefully and becomes an Arab Monaco, while the West Bank is integrated with the Arabs somehow becoming Israeli citizens, probably by some means in which people are more free to decide their own religion lack thereof, with it being understood that Judaism is a religion and anyone who converts to it is allowed to be a citizen. Palestinians are likely to take it if it means a better standard of living and so there you go. The fact that Palestinians are not willing to convert but willing to attack Israel because of how bad their conditions are is just weird. Conversion has happened even from Christian to Muslim with far less problems than this. This is much more like Rome with the animosity that used to exist between Pagans and Christians. Only that Jews and Muslims do not possess that historical animosity and they are both Abrahamic faiths making it weird. I also see the Lebanese diaspora returning back to Lebanon and kicking Hezbollah out. There are 4 million people in Lebanon, 14 million people living practically as exiles from their homeland, not due to Israel, but due to Hezbollah and Palestinian militants (who were kicked by Israel and Lebanese supporters, which led to Hezbollah's existence). I do see the Gulf Union becoming a reality. I do not at all see how the Houthis becoming part of Saudi Arabia whether becoming secular or not. I don't even see the Semitic League being semitic beyond just a tolerance between Judaism, Islam, Christianity, and Druze with selective tolerance to the non-religious chiefly seen in Lebanon, Egypt, Syria and Israel. Again a mixed system between an Administrative zone and a confederation.
5) Maghreb Union is more likely to be a Federation. There isn't really any reason for it to be so decentralized. I don't see it becoming a unitary state. So it is likely to be an Arab Muslim North American Union entity in North Africa.
6) Eurasian Administrative Zone. Mmm... If Western Russia is annexed into Europe, which is what I see as its future after Putin is gone, it is more likely to become a Siberian Administrative Zone headed in a bipolar loose association between Kazakhstan and Mongolia. So expect something much closer to what you had said about South America.
7) Central Asian Administrative Zone probably would exist as you had said, but I don't see Qatar and Bahrain being a part of it, especially after Iran and Pakistan fall. I don't even think Pakistan would exist. There would be too much bad blood or animosity between these people to ever form a union. So it would be an Administrative zone that exists just for trade and administrative purpose for the region before the World Government. Mostly agree.
8) People's Republic of China would not exist at this time given Chinese history and China's current state. It would definitely decline and as it declines with the population it currently has, people would be eager to go their own way, so it is likely if China re-emerged it would just be a confederation. Also, I don't see how East Asia and China remain separate. It is more likely to be something similar to Europe in which various intermingling would exist making it overall an Administrative zone but with probably similar complexity as Europe, largely because I don't see how anything different would exist between Korea and Japan. I believe this would be called the East Asian Administrative Zone.
9) No substantive change for ASEAN. Pretty much spot on, although Indonesia is likely to fall apart which would lead to a more complex ASEAN, still confederacy is the most likely outcome and progression of such.
10) Oceanian Administrative Zone is more likely to become a Confederation given the overlap of shared history, commercial activity and politics. So probably the United Oceanic League or the United Oceanic Confederation. It depends on a few factors going either way.
11) South Asian Administrative Zone. Yep. Absolutely no change, whatsoever.
12) West African Administrative Zone. Yep.
13) East African Administrative Zone. Yep.
14) Middle African Administrative Zone. Yep.
15) Southern African Administrative Zone. Yep.
16) United Territories of Antarctica. I would probably call it the United Cantons of Antarctica, which are more likely to function as a confederation as they are just domed cities with a lot of open land making integration further quite unrealistic and unnecessary since being a bunch of domed city makes much of the necessities of centralized administration unnecessary.
17) I do think underwater colonization would occur as it is the next step before colonizing the atmosphere with floating cities and eventually space. I do think floating cities within the atmosphere and not in space are likely to become extensions of regional entities like Americana. Probably the Free Association of Subnautica (referring to being under water). You can use your imagination but it would probably consist of settlements on the ocean floor with some floating colonies between the ocean floor and the surface as well as some floating on the surface. I believe Subnautica would band together more eagerly in a very loose political arrangement as would want to remain independent from the surface and the territorial waters of each surface nation, then again I probably like Aquaman from DC a little too much. Consider Subnautica either be really, really libertarian or really, really racist-fascist or somewhat between.
18) Space colonies. There are regions of space ideal for orbital stations with colonial habitations which I feel are necessary as infrastructure to support transportation, commerce and certainly administration of a solar system spanning system. Probably as the Administrative Zone of Geospace Satellites.
19) Luna Council, only that it is more likely to be a confederation as what happened to Antarctica. Domed cities that are pretty much isolated from each other. Even if they are underground, it wouldn't be likely that such a body would have anything more a confederation structure of government.
So that is the 19 Administrative Zones of the United Nations of Earth and Luna.
I do agree with Mercury and Venus unless they become terraformed would just become Territorial extensions of the UNEL, probably referred to as Planetary Territories rather than as Territories as they are likely divided into territorial zones.
I don't see Mars becoming a federation simply for the same reasons as Antarctica. So maybe the Martian Confederation would be better.
Ceres is likely to involve many settlements on various Asteroids, so I see more of an Asymmetrical Federation which is somewhat between a true federation and a unitary state. Still Ceres Collective is a good name for it.
Jovian Commonwealth? Eh... Maybe. Jovian League more likely and probably as a confederation. I can see how Callisto could dominate it, but at the same time the technology needed to colonize it would allow colonization of the other moons. Io would be a territory and Europe an Antarctica in space, but Ganymede is almost the same as Callisto.
Union of Titan and the Saturnian System? I guess. I don't really see it any way except Titan and the others just being administrative zones tied to it, ultimately being a federation, although probably Asymmetrical like Ceres.
United Moons of Uranus/Ouranos. This I could see becoming a commonwealth which is a semi-autonomous confederation tied to Earth+Luna, Mars, Jupiter and Saturn/Titan. It is in a similar boat as Canada and Australia in which much of its government is locally elected but the crucial components tied to administrative functions are appointed by the big four with the fifth uniting executive probably decided by all four in unison with the inhabitants of each moon. Each moon still operates semi-autonomous itself from the association/commonwealth.
Neptune Sovereignty of Triton would probably be a unitary state if any should exist, but I sincerely doubt it. It depends on how settlements function on the moon. It is likely by the time humans colonize here and given its size, there might just be one colonize complex which could central authority enough in itself, but with some devolved authority to satellite colonies across its surface.
State of Pluto and Charon, Federation. Same thing as Triton but as a federation between Pluto and its moon.
There would probably be more of these Unitary or Federation entities in the Kuiper Belt.
Persephone Outposts. Yep. But it exists for two reason, not just advancing deep space colonization but also exploration into other solar systems.
New Warhammer 2k episode just dropped
You put Beirut as capital of Middle East and Central Asían administrative zones
That was a mistake
@@Neatlingwhat was it supposed to be?
I distinctly remember being in the process of deciding whether it should just be Tehran or some compromise city, then for whatever reason I moved on before I had decided. So I actually don't know yet, I don't want to make a snap decision.
I am going to post the administrative zone on r/imaginarymaps on reddit at some point, and will have decided by then. But likely Tehran, possibly some compromise city.
hmmm i wonder how terraforming would be tackmed and when (korzgesagt gave very interesting and quick solutions, but very expensive and powerful, and would probably need control of jovian moons)
Do you really think we're going to be off this planet by 2324? This really is science fiction
Why not? 300 years is far enough
@@Terranallias18 No it's fucking not. We can't even get to the moon in the next ten years, let alone fucking Mars, no there's not gonna be civilization on Mars for millenniums
Wrong
This is an optimistic scenario. But I mean we did visit the moon in the 60s, and 300 years ago, we hadn't even set foot on Antarctica or gone through the industrial revolution. A lot can happen in 300 years. So yeah, I think it's possible, I lay out my reasons for thinking so in more detail in part 1.
The reason we aren't doing more in space right now is not because we can't, but because it isn't a priority, Nasa's budget is not very big and has been shrinking for decades. But China's space agency is catching up in terms of funding, and I think that will push the US to finally focus more on space exploration again so China doesn't outshine the US.
@@Neatling there's a progress Plateau though. There's a reason why we haven't gotten data storage or processors that are the same size but have a higher capacity and that's because we're bumping up against physical limits. And it's not one to one analogous but we're doing the same thing with space. We're not going to be on Mars in 300 years. Not any permanent capacity I can guarantee you that and certainly not Titan
Whats the name of the moons of planet 9 (in your predictions),please say it in my comment
Shouldn't Antarctica have a higher population? (or even the oceans) If settlement on the other planets and Luna have been achieved Antarctica should be nigh infinitely easier?
I hope Venus gets some terraforming love next episode! I wonder if Mercury will stand the test of time and not be deleted for a eventual dyson swarm lol
Part
- skylab 1983
please do what if the middle east didnt have oil
Fuck now you're making me wanna play Starfield just as I'm about to start my second cyberpunk playthrought. 😭
I think Britain would have split up and its own zone, and I think the EU would probably be a HRE style zone, and because of the rising Monarchism, I think there would be more Monarchies
Honestly i think it'd be in 2150 due to ASI
i dont think I could watch someone die, then be the first people to get immortality, that sounds like mental torture.
i can take it with pleasure
10:29 Mercury actually has a lot of water ice in its polar craters.
Yeah it likely has some deposits, that's what I imagined would sustain its population. I just meant relative to the rest of the solar system. The biggest factor in its low population is simply how expensive going there is in terms of Delta-V. That is not a problem in the 2300s due to super efficient fusion powered propulsion, but it was in previous centuries.
@@Neatling Alright. Love the story.
I was here when the video is 48 seconds old
I don't agree with that nations borders will remain same till 2300 because in reality in dee years everything is gona change everything
I can see you asume that Ukraine will lose the war ?
Not quite, it's more of a standstill. Ukraine eventually joins NATO and the EU, exactly what Russia wants to avoid. The war ends in a standstill along the frontline similar to the Korean war, with no official redrawing of the border, but with the frontline becoming the border in practice. But keep in mind that this is entirely speculative and fiction.
A 300 year old stand still? Russia is a decaying power it doesn't have a chance to remain what's is it more than Portuguese or Spanish conquerors have to be in the 1600 from to 1900 .
Seems like a pretty hopefull future. 😊
I don't think congo is gonna survive as one state. Probably split into two or 3 countries, with no cenral african block. Angola being part of the southern block and possibly the south of congo. With the rest being split between east and west africa.
I also don't think china will get sakhalin. I think Japan would sieze it, if china started to take back manchuria.
That Mars flag is really familiar. I'm guessing a guy named Amos is going to get his ass kicked when trying to correct it.
How did indonesia lose west papua? With indonesia being this powerful i don't think the west papuan would get independence.
same as east timor i guess, the goverment just give up and agree to give independence anyway