@@635574 I mean Lamborghini's logic is flawless. Look at Strange's horrifying crash. Like, normally that would kill people. _But he didn't die_ Obviously Lamborghinis are so safe that you can survive a crash like that!
This is like when they made the first of the Michael Bay Transformers movies. They approached Ford about using the Mustang and Ford was originally onboard. Then Ford learned that the Mustang would be a bad guy while all of the good guys were GM products and completely backed out. Now, a "Mustang" did technically appear in the movie, but that's only because the producers then approached Saleen. The Saleen S-281 was built under license using a Mustang body, but it is legally considered a separate model produced by a separate company. Saleen saw the opportunity to have their car do cool shit in a blockbuster movie and basically said "Please, go ahead!"
@@hungrynapps I know a few people who had their Fords burn down in their driveway. Wife had a '95 Mustang when we first met and damn did that switch for the lights get hot.
6:36 I hit my keyboard on accident and it skipped to 6:46 so it sounded like. "On one hand I can see why some companies wouldn't want their logo in front of... Ethnic Minorities"
This got recommended to me and it feels so bizarre to see Luke and Linus sitting next to each other again after what feels like decades of Zoom-call WAN Show
Hol up! "don't touch your eyes btw, that's bad" "gotta scratch my nose, oh no" uses arm 5 minutes later "Oh, this is your water bottle I've been drinking from, lets switch it back"
i love how Luke is like the only person on the staff who legit finds Linus' puns funny. it's so wholesome and probably half the reason that Linus chose him to run Floatplane
I heard one of my dad's customers had a dentistry called iTooth dental and it had the apple logo perched on the building and Apple enforced the trademark against that dentistry.
Wait...jurrassic world 2: the bad guy's lab had apple computers. I remember thinking "why is he using apple for genetic research and engineering. That sounds like a Windows or Linux thing for that much horsepower"
So two things that I encounter every day. 1. People in general are sheep. They will follow the leader en mass regardless of the direction. 2. People in general are idiots. The Corona beer company took a 13% hit to their sales figures because the general public had no idea that CV was in no way connected to the beer. Point, match, set!
it might sound harsh, but essentially it's true. There is a lot of research indicating most people can't fill in a standardized form with basic information (hence the research by companies how to deal with that etc.). Given that, what's there to say about anything that requires critical thinking, or any kind of thinking for that matter.
@@walkermorales337 I always did my extra credit. It was always so easy you could call it free points. It's the reason I passed classes like US History and Amer. Fed Government with over 100%. Just seems stupid not to do it!
By the way, it's not because people think Corona beer is just a canister of Corona virus, it's just negative associations. If you had a kind of snack for sale in the 70s called AIDs, you could expect to take a hit in sales in the 80s. Not because people literally think it's where the epidemic is coming from, just because you start to associate the name with bad things. That said, I'm sure about 0.1% of that 13% are actual idiots, but most arent.
I think it's because it's related to a live thing and getting these clips out is in the same pocket as watching the WAN show, which unless there's something I don't know and WAN show isn't actually live
But wait, the bad guy is just as smart as the good guy and quite a lot of the time, SMARTER!!! So Apple doesn't want one of the smartest characters to choose to have bought a product of theirs!!!!!
@@apathyzen9730 apple has always targeted dumb customers. Nobody intelligent would've bought an iPhone back when you could literally only interface with other apple products,. it was essentially a contract to buy only from apple (apple computers apple phones and even itunes for apple music). if you didnt already have the other products you weren't just buying a phone, you were buying a lifestyle and everything that came with it. Even today apple hasnt gotten their shit together with the standardized charging port that literally every other mobile device has including their own laptops for fuck sake.
One thing to consider also about demonetisation of videos is, If there is a viral video of a mass shooting or whatever, companies don't want to be seen as taking advantage of the viewing traffic going to that video and putting ads on it. That would seem unethical of the company to do that
what if any of GTA characters would use iPhone? From scenario perspective - good guy, from stastistics perspective - he killed hundreds of pedestrians while driving xD
So I‘ve worked in GDPR compliance for a year and as far as I can tell, kids pushing a rating button while exiting a cinema without personalized tickets or any other additional data collection that can identify them is not personal data and thus doesn‘t require the level of protection you guys are thinking about
Knives Out was a fantastic film and I don't think we can attribute all of the shortcomings of TLJ to Rian Johnson. Disney homogenizing the franchize set him up for failure from the start.
Does this mean I can't film someone doing a bad thing while they're visibly in possession of an iPhone? Like where does this begin and end? If my friend agrees to the terms, and I film him, portrayed as a bad guy, who is breaking the T&C?
I'm watching the show Defending Jacob on Apple TV+ right now (good show BTW), but I noticed at the very end of the second episode, one of the suspects was using an Android phone. Could tell by the status bar and bottom navigation buttons. Now I largely feel like I know where the show is heading.
Not a lawyer, not law advice, but maybe you're responsible for how your device is used by other people. Maybe by transferring device you're obliged to transfer the knowledge of lawfully using it
If ever I didn't agree with the terms and conditions of the phone can I return it? or should the seller make you read the terms and conditions before buying? Just curious 😅
Olson De Asis I’m not a lawyer but I believe that the terms and conditions are mainly used to outline the company’s ability to change or terminate your use of their products and services, as well as how they may execute that right. So for example, they can say you can not modify your device firmware and that breaking that rule will get you banned from iCloud (might not be a real example, just for explanation), they are basically telling you they reserve the right to kill your iCloud account if you break the rule at any time. That being said, if you don’t agree to the terms (you feel they are too restrictive or whatever), you are absolutely free to simply stop using the product at any time. Disagreeing, however does not exempt you from the terms and conditions. They’re telling you what they will do and how, not asking you for permission.
@@SafetySheepRnD I seem to recall reading something about how in the EU, contracts/agreements like this, where you are only made aware of them after you purchase, are completely unenforceable because it's something we are made aware of only after your purchase. It may even meet the definition of coercion since your ability to use the full functionality of the device is predicated on you agreeing.
Zeldagigafan hmm I’m not familiar at all with EU legal stuff but Apple does have the full terms and conditions on their website, so I’m not sure if that would allow them to still have a case against you. In the case talked about in the video, it might fall under copyright and trademark law not end user licensing law, and I don’t think you need to be made aware of the terms in those types of cases. So I’m not sure where this one lies. You might be right tho.
@@SafetySheepRnD Trademarks are about branding, yes, but not in the "you need permission to use these in a commercial setting" type of thing. All it does is prevent me from using something affiliated with a particular brand for a similar product. If I have a website that sells some of my photos, I CAN use the same shade of red that Coca Cola uses for their brand-name soda, but if I get into soft drink production, then I can't use that color.
@@danieljensen2626 I understand that.... But I've moved away from android, use Alexa devices at home, use Roku and Fire TV, and have started using Firefox at times.
So if it's in the apple terms and conditions, would you be allowed to show the apple logo if you just never turned the device on, becaus eyou can certainly buy one eithout agreeing to the ts and cs?
Agreed re Rick Moranis. I gained a lot of respect for him when I found out why he stopped acting. Having seen and appreciated him in 80s/90s movies like Ghostbusters and Honey I Shrunk the Kid, I always wondered why he dropped off the face of the Earth.
Apple licenses you the OS. You can do whatever you want with the device. If you break its ToU/S, you are at risk to losing the license to your operating system. By agreeing you are contractually obligated to abide to the rules. Which is why in some cases it could be used in legal ramifications if someone of value is delinquent on the terms they agreed to.
13:58 People actually care about these stuff though, especially after the Matrix with the Banana phone from Nokia etc. that boosted sales for the phone. Similarly, an opposite effect is quite possible as well.
I kind of understand Apple's point of view for this one. Imagine if movies continuously make terrorists wear LTT hoodie along with their AK-47 . Even if people know that your product isn't meant for that, it still leaves bad image.
10:00 that's a very interesting take on the matter, it's not so much that you want to ficinestivise people discussing an issue or punish them for it, but you don't want to incentives peopel who are only seeking monetary gain
That's it, every movie I ever make from now on will always have an Iphone wielding villain and at least some of it will be shot on an IPhone. Come at me Apple!
This kinda reminds me of that story of a company that had there logo on it and sold it to a dealer ship and said the removed the logo but didn't, and the truck with the company logo was sent to a terrorist group and was on the news. people got angry and thought the guy who owned the company was supporting that terrorist group.
iStockPhoto has a policy that some photographs are forbidden to use for negative articles, titles like biased politics, graphic content, violence, pornography related etc....
I phones are still the sign for wanna-be rich-kids. At least for me when I see someone, my first perception is: - Ignorant - wanna-be rich - unknowledged with Tech
Why it is that everytime I get drunk Im sooooo close to buying vr headset. Can you recommend something okay with honor 10 and not htc vive with loan :D
Don't drink and online shop. It hurt the wallet, and your VR set will probably end up in a drawer not being used in a few months, collecting dust. Source: me, I"m a drunk shopper.
@@BrawndoQC I use mine everyday. The trick is getting one that isn't a PITA to setup everytime you wanna use it.(i.e. the Oculus Quest) Source: me, I bought the Samsung Odyssey and Oculus Rift and almost got a Vive.
@@matteodevellis6266 Good to know, I've a great gaming PC but my impulse buy was the one for the PS4. I like it but as you said, it's such a PITA to setup with all the cables, controllers etc that I just don't use it anymore. Will take a look at the model you're referring to.
2:10 Considering some of the iPhones have started to develop a jittery camera, why would you want to? This is why I have a 6S Plus AND an S6. I find the 6S Plus to be a necessary evil because customers are going to ask me what's wrong with their iPhone. The only problem I had with the S6 was the the battery ballooned after it overheated from being used as a hotspot.
JJ Abrams ruined Star Wars with episode 9 more than Ryan did with Episode 8 because JJ didn't take risks, he did what was safe, and any risks he took were backpeddled within the same movie. Ryan took risks and made an interesting movie that we can have a conversation around, there's nothing interesting in episode 9 worth talking about that isn't a negative context.
Disagree, it was impossible to follow up Episode 8, all of the plot threads started in 7 were abruptly ended. Sure it "took risks", but none of the choices made progressed a story or heightened stakes which is what the second film in a Trilogy is supposed to do. I didn't like TROS, but I really think it was Episode 8's fault. JJ had to craft a new villian, setup new stakes, and resolve it all within one movie.
@@evanthehunter Those are valid complaints, but JJ didn't NEED to bring back Palpatine, he could have just made Kylo the main and only villain. It would have been great to see Kylo without the leash of Hux or Smoke tying him down fight against Rey. Honestly the best part of the new trilogy is seeing their conflict, they're both so close yet so far from going to the opposite sides.
@@ThatOneDudeWhoPostsStuff Not sure if 100% confirmed but bringing back Palpy was Kathleen Kennedy's idea. I agree, there was more interesting things that "could" have been done with TROS but they would have most likely have been just as lack luster as what we got. There wasn't anything to be excited for after Episode 8, I highly doubt RJ could even make a sequel to it.
To be fair JJ also make TFA, which basically returned the Star Wars universe back to where it was(ish) in episode 4. He also devalued his own villain (Kylo) by having him loose to a n00b. Then Rhian messed it up more, then JJ somehow made that even worse but also more entertaining than TLJ.
@@fastenedcarrot9570 I don't like all 3, but TFA was at least passable, if the second film in the trilogy was at least good and built upon the story/raised stakes it would have made TFA better imo. It's TLJ that makes TFA a worst movie. If TFA did one thing right it was leave us on a good cliffhanger to get us excited for the next movie. TLJ does none of that, I think it is arguably the worst 2nd film in a trilogy in cinema history.
A Law Person's perspective: This is not a grey area. Apple's logo is a trademark and its use can only be restricted to the extent permitted by trademark law. The context of a review is not one of those restricted areas in most jurisdictions. So it can be reviewed freely. But there can be a prohibition on using it in movies because those are not reviews. Even there however, the logo can still be used as long as it doesn't demonstrate an "endorsement" or a "connection with the brand" or is "trying to play on the goodwill" of the product. No contract (which is what the terms of service are) can modify a law of Congress, it must comply with them so it won't be enforceable in a court if it goes against that law.
I always wondered why apple logos are covered in alot of TV shows... I always thought it was studios being petty because apple wouldn't pay them for product placement, turns out it's apple being petty...
@ Um that is one of the Sequels. Now how can you have not seen a sequel but also know it's crap. Like I'm all for being critical of a movie or show but only if you've actually watched it. Cause even though I have my complaints about the sequel trilogy I still watched all of them in theaters and will happily sit down and binge though them when the mood strikes.
Ad setters have the vanity to think I pay any attention to what they post on my feeds. I may have deliberately clicked 10 ad links in 20 years of webbing.
Bad Boys, Bad Boys, What ya gonna do?
Not use Apple, otherwise they'll sue.
This needs way more up votes!
Rhyme-ish
Apple: "YOU CAN'T HAVE A BAD GUY USE OUR PRODUCTS"
Lamborghini: "yeah you can show dr strange almost die in a car crash."
Jaguar: Let's make an ad about how the bad guys in movies are always driving our cars.
No car will save you when you fall of a cliff, unless we have a cybertruck that wont let you fall.
@@635574 I mean Lamborghini's logic is flawless. Look at Strange's horrifying crash. Like, normally that would kill people. _But he didn't die_
Obviously Lamborghinis are so safe that you can survive a crash like that!
@@The_Viktor_Reznov well, he was so crippled that he had to go to nepal and become Wizard just to make himself functional
@@Mercilessonion _But he didn't die_
Presumably if you bought an iPhone and never turned it on you wouldn’t have to agree to the T&Cs
Or just buy a non functional phone for almost nothing a do what you want...
Lol
Or u can just buy a GooPhone 11 Pro Max 😂
My guess it relates more to showing iOS instead of the hardware.
Or technically if someone else pressed that button, you technically never agreed to the T&Cs
Love how Linus was in the middle of saying "I don't think any of our viewers are stupid enough to... oh wait actually" lmao
That was a hilarious pause
This is like when they made the first of the Michael Bay Transformers movies. They approached Ford about using the Mustang and Ford was originally onboard. Then Ford learned that the Mustang would be a bad guy while all of the good guys were GM products and completely backed out.
Now, a "Mustang" did technically appear in the movie, but that's only because the producers then approached Saleen. The Saleen S-281 was built under license using a Mustang body, but it is legally considered a separate model produced by a separate company. Saleen saw the opportunity to have their car do cool shit in a blockbuster movie and basically said "Please, go ahead!"
😂😂 but in real life . Ford is a bad guy.. always breaking down n costing owners money
@@hungrynapps I know a few people who had their Fords burn down in their driveway. Wife had a '95 Mustang when we first met and damn did that switch for the lights get hot.
Ford = fix or repair daily
@@clarkeysam you know what ford stands for fix it again Tony. dale I think you mean fiat
@@ianthompson2802 your reply doesnt make sense.
Lotus = Loads of trouble, usually serious.
6:36 I hit my keyboard on accident and it skipped to 6:46 so it sounded like.
"On one hand I can see why some companies wouldn't want their logo in front of... Ethnic Minorities"
Apple: you can’t use apple products as being villains.
Star Lord receives a Zune instead of an ipod.
This got recommended to me and it feels so bizarre to see Luke and Linus sitting next to each other again after what feels like decades of Zoom-call WAN Show
"where did he touch you?"
"in my star wars"
is that a new code for urethra
Damn
Your _star_ is your _balloon knot._
I'm pretty sure it has something to do with a small exhuast port...
Ramel lol
I think it's code for "Light Saber".
what is wrong with people?
Regarding people being unable to disassociate vaguely related issues: The company who makes Corona beer has lost a ton of money recently
I mean the beer is pretty bad even if it was called "super best beer" i wouldn't drink it if the bar had anything else
@@lootmaster1337 The beer it's mexican and in Mexico we dont use to drink it
@@lootmaster1337 if other beers are lemonade, Corona beer is flavored water.
So they do have one thing (beside the name) in common: lack of taste!
It's gonna be pretty easy to predict movie endings now like, "Ah, Android phone! He's gonna kill everybody."
The good guys are allowed Android phones… ;-) If someone has an iPhone, they're the good guys.
Hol up!
"don't touch your eyes btw, that's bad"
"gotta scratch my nose, oh no" uses arm
5 minutes later
"Oh, this is your water bottle I've been drinking from, lets switch it back"
Exactly 😂😂😂 I was gonna say this
and they are 20 cm apart.
It's weird looking back at this how relaxed people were about this at the start of the year
Me, using an Android: Yeah, I guess you could say I'm kind of a bad boy ;)
😎😎😎
HES TOO DANGEROUS TO BE LEFT ALIVE
Now you put an apple logo sticker on your phone: Bad Boy Bonus x2
@@DJMMLJ bruh your using the worst android phone then because android is the best
@@john5311 Hes using some Samsung j series phone XDD
Apple needs to see the It's Good to Be Bad commercial series for Jaguar to realize what they are missing out on!
The hidden in plain sight villain represents apples policies perfectly, I don't understand why they are mad.
i love how Luke is like the only person on the staff who legit finds Linus' puns funny. it's so wholesome and probably half the reason that Linus chose him to run Floatplane
That's how Defending Jacob was spoiled for me. Only one character had an android in it which became quite obvious who the bad guy was.
Apples term of services. Why does south park come to mind
*Knives Out 2: The Iphone-ing*
I heard one of my dad's customers had a dentistry called iTooth dental and it had the apple logo perched on the building and Apple enforced the trademark against that dentistry.
Wait...jurrassic world 2: the bad guy's lab had apple computers.
I remember thinking "why is he using apple for genetic research and engineering. That sounds like a Windows or Linux thing for that much horsepower"
That's probably why the dinosaurs were out of control
@@sbdnsngdsnsns31312
Ah. So you are saying that the upfront is Mac but behind the scenes is Linux.
Ya learn something new
So two things that I encounter every day.
1. People in general are sheep.
They will follow the leader en mass regardless of the direction.
2. People in general are idiots.
The Corona beer company took a 13% hit to their sales figures because the general public had no idea that CV was in no way connected to the beer.
Point, match, set!
it might sound harsh, but essentially it's true. There is a lot of research indicating most people can't fill in a standardized form with basic information (hence the research by companies how to deal with that etc.). Given that, what's there to say about anything that requires critical thinking, or any kind of thinking for that matter.
Mikhail a professor at my uni offers extra credit if every student fills out their multiple choice test correctly, it has never been done yet
@@walkermorales337 I always did my extra credit. It was always so easy you could call it free points. It's the reason I passed classes like US History and Amer. Fed Government with over 100%. Just seems stupid not to do it!
By the way, it's not because people think Corona beer is just a canister of Corona virus, it's just negative associations. If you had a kind of snack for sale in the 70s called AIDs, you could expect to take a hit in sales in the 80s. Not because people literally think it's where the epidemic is coming from, just because you start to associate the name with bad things.
That said, I'm sure about 0.1% of that 13% are actual idiots, but most arent.
@@DJMMLJ Are You One of The Sheeple ??
What would you do if someone makes a pipebomb out of one your water bottles in a movie ?
add "can be used as a makeshift pipebomb" in the ad obviously.
The Guardian (horrible website) is one of the only non-bias newspapers in the UK 😂😂
Can they still go after you if you modify the apple logo? Like lets say I fill in the bite so it's a whole apple.
Nope! If I was the filmaker, I would do that just to rub it in apple's face.
why aren't LMG Clips on floatplane? I often don't have time to watch the entire wan show so I think it's really cool to have these small snippets.
You know, I don’t have floatplane but this is a great idea.
I think it's because it's related to a live thing and getting these clips out is in the same pocket as watching the WAN show, which unless there's something I don't know and WAN show isn't actually live
It's true, when watching defending Jacob everyone has an iPhone apart from the murderer who has an android
But wait, the bad guy is just as smart as the good guy and quite a lot of the time, SMARTER!!! So Apple doesn't want one of the smartest characters to choose to have bought a product of theirs!!!!!
The bad guys aren't allowed to have iPhones in Movies. But they always do in real life...
Apple is targeting dumb customers this time. For a smart customer it doesn't matter whether bad guys use iPhones in movies or not.
@@apathyzen9730 apple has always targeted dumb customers. Nobody intelligent would've bought an iPhone back when you could literally only interface with other apple products,. it was essentially a contract to buy only from apple (apple computers apple phones and even itunes for apple music). if you didnt already have the other products you weren't just buying a phone, you were buying a lifestyle and everything that came with it. Even today apple hasnt gotten their shit together with the standardized charging port that literally every other mobile device has including their own laptops for fuck sake.
@@Vyscera consoles have done that for years and until recently didn't want to play with each other.
@@Vyscera Wow you sure must be a top tier high IQ intellectual boi.
Then why do News corporations get ads on *insert demonetized phrase*
Because they're "real media".
you mean human malware
One thing to consider also about demonetisation of videos is,
If there is a viral video of a mass shooting or whatever, companies don't want to be seen as taking advantage of the viewing traffic going to that video and putting ads on it. That would seem unethical of the company to do that
Maybe if the bad guy is the only guy with an iPhone, but not if he just happens to have an iPhone.
what if any of GTA characters would use iPhone?
From scenario perspective - good guy, from stastistics perspective - he killed hundreds of pedestrians while driving xD
Good Boys : Enjoyed using this expensive iPhone 12 in the entire movie 🙂
Bad Boys : We don't use cheap iPhone12 but we use satellite phone 😅
So I‘ve worked in GDPR compliance for a year and as far as I can tell, kids pushing a rating button while exiting a cinema without personalized tickets or any other additional data collection that can identify them is not personal data and thus doesn‘t require the level of protection you guys are thinking about
Knives Out was a fantastic film and I don't think we can attribute all of the shortcomings of TLJ to Rian Johnson. Disney homogenizing the franchize set him up for failure from the start.
what stops people from just flat out stating "apple is such a great company for my stuff(terrorism)"?
Does this mean I can't film someone doing a bad thing while they're visibly in possession of an iPhone? Like where does this begin and end? If my friend agrees to the terms, and I film him, portrayed as a bad guy, who is breaking the T&C?
I'm watching the show Defending Jacob on Apple TV+ right now (good show BTW), but I noticed at the very end of the second episode, one of the suspects was using an Android phone. Could tell by the status bar and bottom navigation buttons. Now I largely feel like I know where the show is heading.
So if you get a phone that already has been activated by someone else, and you never agreed to the EULA, would you even be able to enforce this?
Not a lawyer, not law advice, but maybe you're responsible for how your device is used by other people. Maybe by transferring device you're obliged to transfer the knowledge of lawfully using it
@@Optimistas777 i know this is late but terms of service are by and large non enforceable eulas do not hold up in court
The only bad guy Apple wants with an iPhone is Apple lol
If ever I didn't agree with the terms and conditions of the phone can I return it? or should the seller make you read the terms and conditions before buying? Just curious 😅
Olson De Asis I’m not a lawyer but I believe that the terms and conditions are mainly used to outline the company’s ability to change or terminate your use of their products and services, as well as how they may execute that right. So for example, they can say you can not modify your device firmware and that breaking that rule will get you banned from iCloud (might not be a real example, just for explanation), they are basically telling you they reserve the right to kill your iCloud account if you break the rule at any time. That being said, if you don’t agree to the terms (you feel they are too restrictive or whatever), you are absolutely free to simply stop using the product at any time. Disagreeing, however does not exempt you from the terms and conditions. They’re telling you what they will do and how, not asking you for permission.
@@SafetySheepRnD I seem to recall reading something about how in the EU, contracts/agreements like this, where you are only made aware of them after you purchase, are completely unenforceable because it's something we are made aware of only after your purchase. It may even meet the definition of coercion since your ability to use the full functionality of the device is predicated on you agreeing.
Zeldagigafan hmm I’m not familiar at all with EU legal stuff but Apple does have the full terms and conditions on their website, so I’m not sure if that would allow them to still have a case against you. In the case talked about in the video, it might fall under copyright and trademark law not end user licensing law, and I don’t think you need to be made aware of the terms in those types of cases. So I’m not sure where this one lies. You might be right tho.
@@SafetySheepRnD Trademarks are about branding, yes, but not in the "you need permission to use these in a commercial setting" type of thing. All it does is prevent me from using something affiliated with a particular brand for a similar product. If I have a website that sells some of my photos, I CAN use the same shade of red that Coca Cola uses for their brand-name soda, but if I get into soft drink production, then I can't use that color.
@@SafetySheepRnD IMO, it shouldn''t be legal to terminate someone's use of a product because they broke a TOS agreement
One of the Hydra members in Avengers Endgame, where Cap enters the elevator is using an S7
The only villans using iphones are apple executors
"like the idea you would need an intercom to talk to somebody another floor" I meaaaan to be fair "hey Google tell everyone to come downstairs"
Google shouldn’t decide.... the viewers should decide what they watch. I’m steadily moving away from Google products.
I'm glad you used this Google product to let us know that.
@@danieljensen2626 I understand that.... But I've moved away from android, use Alexa devices at home, use Roku and Fire TV, and have started using Firefox at times.
hey man you do you, one user at a time
@@danieljensen2626 underrated comment
"This website is horrible."
the guardian, lol
There is another thing, this really hurts independent news channels when they do an in-depth analysis, YT doesn't see the difference.
Bad Guys use Windows Phones
A movie where a serial killer murders people with the LTT screwdriver.
So if it's in the apple terms and conditions, would you be allowed to show the apple logo if you just never turned the device on, becaus eyou can certainly buy one eithout agreeing to the ts and cs?
@@DJMMLJ My point was not that you never saw it, my point was that you didn't *agree* to it.
Everybody gangsta till someone whips out a Nokia.
Yeah, that good guy/bad guy thing would be real confusing for Barney Stinson
Agreed re Rick Moranis. I gained a lot of respect for him when I found out why he stopped acting.
Having seen and appreciated him in 80s/90s movies like Ghostbusters and Honey I Shrunk the Kid, I always wondered why he dropped off the face of the Earth.
In the Philippines, TV series villains are the ones who have iphones and protagonists uses a 3310 nokia
Apple licenses you the OS. You can do whatever you want with the device. If you break its ToU/S, you are at risk to losing the license to your operating system. By agreeing you are contractually obligated to abide to the rules. Which is why in some cases it could be used in legal ramifications if someone of value is delinquent on the terms they agreed to.
Linus: A star war?
Train: *MEME HORN!*
Aren’t bad guys more badass
Josh Man I agree, though... while I do agree, I wasn’t making a legitimate point.
Say what you want, but H-man makes a compelling argument.
bad guys use nokia 1100
13:58 People actually care about these stuff though, especially after the Matrix with the Banana phone from Nokia etc. that boosted sales for the phone. Similarly, an opposite effect is quite possible as well.
I kind of understand Apple's point of view for this one. Imagine if movies continuously make terrorists wear LTT hoodie along with their AK-47 . Even if people know that your product isn't meant for that, it still leaves bad image.
@@wolfmanjack5379 Exactly. I know that there's no good guy's gun / bad guy's gun. But hollywood and counter-strike usually present it this way
at least he had the balls to do what he wanted with star wars instead of just re hashing previous movies while pandering
10:00 that's a very interesting take on the matter, it's not so much that you want to ficinestivise people discussing an issue or punish them for it, but you don't want to incentives peopel who are only seeking monetary gain
"I see it from both sides" is kinda a cop-out
Just like bad guys have to use AK good guys use M4
Time to make a short film with a bad guy decked out in Apple and LMG products.
11:59 Linus contemplating our stupidity
in a hypothetical code geass live action movie, could Lelouch use apple ?
Apple isn't the worst😂😂😂. Ask deadmau5 about the cease and desist he got from Ferrari😂
I remember that, incredibly stupid
Rian Johnson made the best Star Wars movie.
Linus in the thumbnail looks like Henry Cavill with his mustache photoshopped out
Luke's very strong opinions on the newer StarWars films reminded me of RLM's comment on extreme fandom
Now google should ban villains from using Android phones too. Villains will be cursed to use only flip phones.
That's it, every movie I ever make from now on will always have an Iphone wielding villain and at least some of it will be shot on an IPhone. Come at me Apple!
remember when they were still recording in the same room
0:44 love the perfectly timed train horn stinger for a bad joke.
This kinda reminds me of that story of a company that had there logo on it and sold it to a dealer ship and said the removed the logo but didn't, and the truck with the company logo was sent to a terrorist group and was on the news. people got angry and thought the guy who owned the company was supporting that terrorist group.
0:39 the little eyebrow twitch Linus does it’s gold
Interior crocodile alligator, I drive a chevrolet movie 16:37
7:14 "Baby slavery", LMAO
Need to add that to my "Cards against Humanity" deck. :}
Linus just done a Maddison to Luke about word "theatre". You know what I mean if you watched ROG Rig Reboot 2019
in my mind, the bad guys are the cuuuuul guys.
If you see a phone and then a bad scene or violent scene you will subconsciously associate it with the product
iStockPhoto has a policy that some photographs are forbidden to use for negative articles, titles like biased politics, graphic content, violence, pornography related etc....
Linus talking about his childhood memory of "Honey I Shrunk the Kids" is how I view the Star Wars Prequel Trilogy.
I phones are still the sign for wanna-be rich-kids. At least for me when I see someone, my first perception is:
- Ignorant
- wanna-be rich
- unknowledged with Tech
Videos taken moments before disaster.
8:58. That's EXACTLY what it is.
Why it is that everytime I get drunk Im sooooo close to buying vr headset. Can you recommend something okay with honor 10 and not htc vive with loan :D
Don't drink and online shop. It hurt the wallet, and your VR set will probably end up in a drawer not being used in a few months, collecting dust. Source: me, I"m a drunk shopper.
@@BrawndoQC Gotcha that fam
Or can you just play vr drunk?
@@BrawndoQC I use mine everyday. The trick is getting one that isn't a PITA to setup everytime you wanna use it.(i.e. the Oculus Quest) Source: me, I bought the Samsung Odyssey and Oculus Rift and almost got a Vive.
@@matteodevellis6266 Good to know, I've a great gaming PC but my impulse buy was the one for the PS4. I like it but as you said, it's such a PITA to setup with all the cables, controllers etc that I just don't use it anymore. Will take a look at the model you're referring to.
2:10 Considering some of the iPhones have started to develop a jittery camera, why would you want to? This is why I have a 6S Plus AND an S6. I find the 6S Plus to be a necessary evil because customers are going to ask me what's wrong with their iPhone. The only problem I had with the S6 was the the battery ballooned after it overheated from being used as a hotspot.
Wow I want that WAN t-shirt Linus has. Couldn't fund it on LTTstore, shame
JJ Abrams ruined Star Wars with episode 9 more than Ryan did with Episode 8 because JJ didn't take risks, he did what was safe, and any risks he took were backpeddled within the same movie.
Ryan took risks and made an interesting movie that we can have a conversation around, there's nothing interesting in episode 9 worth talking about that isn't a negative context.
Disagree, it was impossible to follow up Episode 8, all of the plot threads started in 7 were abruptly ended. Sure it "took risks", but none of the choices made progressed a story or heightened stakes which is what the second film in a Trilogy is supposed to do.
I didn't like TROS, but I really think it was Episode 8's fault. JJ had to craft a new villian, setup new stakes, and resolve it all within one movie.
@@evanthehunter
Those are valid complaints, but JJ didn't NEED to bring back Palpatine, he could have just made Kylo the main and only villain. It would have been great to see Kylo without the leash of Hux or Smoke tying him down fight against Rey.
Honestly the best part of the new trilogy is seeing their conflict, they're both so close yet so far from going to the opposite sides.
@@ThatOneDudeWhoPostsStuff Not sure if 100% confirmed but bringing back Palpy was Kathleen Kennedy's idea. I agree, there was more interesting things that "could" have been done with TROS but they would have most likely have been just as lack luster as what we got. There wasn't anything to be excited for after Episode 8, I highly doubt RJ could even make a sequel to it.
To be fair JJ also make TFA, which basically returned the Star Wars universe back to where it was(ish) in episode 4. He also devalued his own villain (Kylo) by having him loose to a n00b. Then Rhian messed it up more, then JJ somehow made that even worse but also more entertaining than TLJ.
@@fastenedcarrot9570 I don't like all 3, but TFA was at least passable, if the second film in the trilogy was at least good and built upon the story/raised stakes it would have made TFA better imo. It's TLJ that makes TFA a worst movie. If TFA did one thing right it was leave us on a good cliffhanger to get us excited for the next movie. TLJ does none of that, I think it is arguably the worst 2nd film in a trilogy in cinema history.
Linus you got some Twitching (physical twitching) problems?
The "bad guy" is always the most famous actor, so it's not like the Apple thing is revealing anything that isn't obvious anyway.
To hell with Rian Johnson. He and Kathleen Kennedy can go hand in hand.
A Law Person's perspective: This is not a grey area. Apple's logo is a trademark and its use can only be restricted to the extent permitted by trademark law. The context of a review is not one of those restricted areas in most jurisdictions. So it can be reviewed freely. But there can be a prohibition on using it in movies because those are not reviews. Even there however, the logo can still be used as long as it doesn't demonstrate an "endorsement" or a "connection with the brand" or is "trying to play on the goodwill" of the product. No contract (which is what the terms of service are) can modify a law of Congress, it must comply with them so it won't be enforceable in a court if it goes against that law.
I always wondered why apple logos are covered in alot of TV shows...
I always thought it was studios being petty because apple wouldn't pay them for product placement, turns out it's apple being petty...
Thats why i always break my phone :(
Luke I gotta agree. He hurt me in my star wars too and I'm not happy about it
Haven't seen a single one of the "sequels". Even The Force Awakens was utter crap.
@ Um that is one of the Sequels. Now how can you have not seen a sequel but also know it's crap.
Like I'm all for being critical of a movie or show but only if you've actually watched it. Cause even though I have my complaints about the sequel trilogy I still watched all of them in theaters and will happily sit down and binge though them when the mood strikes.
Ad setters have the vanity to think I pay any attention to what they post on my feeds. I may have deliberately clicked 10 ad links in 20 years of webbing.