Film Theory: Don't Trust A RAT! (Ratatouille)
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 17 มิ.ย. 2024
- Thanks to Epic Games for sponsoring this video!
Fortnite "Nexus War" is here with the Lore, Legends, Heroes and Villains from Marvel! Click here to join the fight ► pixly.go2cloud.org/SH1wl
I'm ready to ruin your childhood once again! Today, I've set my eyes on Ratatouille - or more specifically our little rat chef Remy. Such a good guy right? WRONG! Remy is a JERK! Throughout the entire movie, he's only out for himself with no concern about his so-called "friends". What evidence do I have to back this up? Who is the REAL person (or rat) you should be rooting for? Time to find out!
Become a Food Theorist! ►► bit.ly/2CdCooV
Get yourself some Theory Wear! ► creatorink.co/theorywear-ft
Don't miss a Film Theory! ► bit.ly/1dI8VBH
#Ratatouille #Pixar #RatatouilleMovie #Remy #Disney #DarkDisney #DarkPixar #PixarTheory #DisneyTheory #FilmTheory #Matpat
Need Royalty Free Music for your Content? Try Epidemic Sound.
Get Your 30 Day Free Trial Now ► share.epidemicsound.com/TheFil...
MORE FILM THEORIES
Rick's True CRIME! | Rick and Morty ►► bit.ly/2MVhP2W
Will MORTY KILL RICK?! ►► bit.ly/2qKFFFV
How PICKLE RICK Functions! ►►► bit.ly/2JvU4fT
Blair Witch's SECRET DANGER! ► bit.ly/2qhmv7a
Ariel & Hercules Are RELATED?! ► bit.ly/32WnVWi
Credits:
Writer: Matthew Patrick and Luke Barats
Editor: Danial "BanditRants" Keristoufi, Koen Verhagen, and Lee
Assistant Editor: AlyssaBeCrazy
Sound Editor: Yosi Berman - ภาพยนตร์และแอนิเมชัน
I do want to correct one thing: "Protagonist" does not mean "good guy." Whether or not Remy is the good guy, he's still the protagonist, because he's the central character. To put this into perspective, Frisk is the main protagonist of Undertale regardless of the path that they take, including the Genocide path.
On the opposite side of the coin, "Antagonist" does not mean "bad guy." Whether or not Skinner is the bad guy, he's still the antagonist, because he's the main conflict. To put this into perspective, if there was a story about someone who gets lost in a desert and has to figure out how to survive and get back home, the actual desert would be the main antagonist.
Was wondering if anyone else caught that.
Newbie Gamelover Exaclty.
better example would be light yagamy vs L while light is the protagonist he is far from the "good guy"
YOU DESERVE A SLOW CLAP
Newbie Gamelover
1. That desert-escape would be a great film
2. Like in Order of The Phoenix (Harry Potter) Harry is whining and constantly yells and bursts at his friends but we still root for him because he’s the protagonist.
Theory idea: how much money do phineas and Ferb have. This includes all the same day shipping and other delivery fees.
Yesssss
That sounds amazing
Sounds amazing
Matpat I know what you re gonna do someday
Honestly this is a great idea. I've always wondered how they were able to afford all of those things. Plus the age old theory of Dr. Doof possibly being phineas' dad.
We are forgetting the times Skinner tries to get Linguini to fail by making him cook an impossible dish, or hiding the fact that the restaurant is rightfully Linguini's. He may not have destroyed the evidence, but he did hide it, and defy Gusteau's last wishes.
Yeah, well I'd rather have an obnoxious boss arrested for withholding a deceased partner's will than have a pack of disease ridden rodents run the restaurant itself
@@ItsChevnotJeff True, very true. Arguably the only hero in this movie is the health inspector.
But linguini literally can’t cook, so wasn’t it for everyone’s best interests?
@@gavinflom7093 Even if he can't cook, he is still entitled to decision making and profits from the restaurant.
Yeah but he does crimes in the movie
Theft
and others
I agree with you on all of this except-didn’t he actually try to hide the fact that his employee was the true heir? I feel like a lawyer would have let Linguini know this anyway, but then again, this is a Disney movie so… lol
Kinda, he hid it, but only until the law would no longer give linguine ownership of Gusto's
@@Spectre.0001 still, he never should have his it at all. The lawyer should just have gone to Linguini
Also he turned gusto's immage to a mere logo for many products that have nothing related to gusto's true philosophy about cooking
@@nonhotrovatounnomemigliore9221 that too
@@Stardust_7273 and I remember now that he also kidnapped remy to use him for his freezed foods
Don’t forget that Gusteau’s CLOSES DOWN at the end of the movie. Remy is so selfish, he didn’t even care about the legacy of the chef he idolized.
You got hearted noice.
Oh Lord you’re right-
bucca2 not like he really had a choice
that happened bc he was trying to save the restaurant.
Heartless rat
Protagonist: the leading character or one of the major characters in a drama, movie, novel, or other fictional text.
Antagonist: a person who actively opposes or is hostile to someone or something; an adversary.
Protagonist does not mean "hero." Antagonist does not mean "villain." It is entirely possible the protagonist can be the "villain," while the antagonist is the "hero."
like how in gta you play as the bad guys but you are still a protagonist
You beat me to it. I would also add that Skinner was motivated by greed, and most of his "redeeming" qualities were all attempts at keeping himself, not the business, on top.
this is a Disney childrens cartoon, i think they always have the context of main character is "good" guy
*facepalm* The antagonist is the bad guy
the protagonist is the good guy
if the main character is bad he is the antagonist.
if the guy stopping the bad guy(like metro man in mega mind) is good then he is still the protagonist even if he is stopping the bad guy
@@raykayproductions652 wrong
Skiner is literally doing everything in his power to stop linguini from figuring out he is gustos son so he doesn't become head chef and skinner is literally using his dead friend gusto just to make money and the only reason he wanted to call the health inspector was to get everyone fired because they put him jobless.
It's not called just to make money. It's called Good Business. EVEN if he wants to just make money He's feeding people around the world! THE ONLY REASON IS THAT? HOW ABOUT HE CARES ABOUT THE HEALTH CODE!
@@rentedbreadYou're not wrong but I think the main reason I can see chef Skinner be an antagonist is because in his pursuit, it comes at the cost of going against Gusteau's message while Remy did not want to compromise it.
I do think Matpat and you but correct me in that, really neglected the part that Remy does actually practice hygiene. I'd assume he'd at least take it a step further because it wouldn't do good for any chef if their own filth that made the people who eat their food sick but I don't blame any of you for thinking he doesn't since the movie doesn't showcase this kinda stuff.
@@zerodiversion4509Yes but at the end of the movie, there's a scene where remy brings the rest of his dirty and probably disease-ridden companions over to the restaurant. Yes they cleaned themselves but what about the floor? It could be tremendously contaminated with all sorts of bacteria and diseases.
Remy could’ve taught Linguini the technical sides of cooking (cutting, measuring, stirring, etc.), but he couldn’t teach how to sniff out rotten ingredients or understand what taste combinations work.
Could’ve, should’ve but didn’t
Anything: *is kid friendly*
MatPat: “IT’S EVIL! I SWEAR IT’S EVIL!”
Except he is almost always right.
I can't tell if this is a hate comment or if your just explaining the formula for a theory.
This is why we can't have nice things
@@The_Biologist27 no one said he wasn't
@@kumoriiii ikr lol
Protagonist just means “main character “ the antagonist is the person trying to stop the “protagonist”. The protagonist doesn’t need to be good, and the antagonist doesn’t need to be bad. Disney needs to learn this in my opinion.
Yeah, if you think about a movie centered around a bank robber or something like that, they would still be the protagonist. And the head of police that is doing the right thing by hunting him down would be seen as the Antagonist
@Junxi Liu pro·tag·o·nist
/prōˈtaɡənəst,prəˈtaɡənəst/
Learn to pronounce
noun
the leading character or one of the major characters in a drama, movie, novel, or other fictional text.
It doesn't say they have to be good or bad
@Junxi Liu lol
I mean, it seems like Pixar already knows
Bruh
"Remy, you don't stand a chance."
Best line I've heard all day 💀👍🏼
oh naw
I love Ratatouille, and now I work in the food industry in part because it inspired me as a kid ... and I *hate* to admit that you're right. This theory was really well done. Also I'm happy you self-called-out the Dory theory lol
Everyone Watching: Figuring out Remy is the bad guy
Me: Wait, Linguini had chin hair?!
I also just noticed that
ME
WOW HOW HAVE U JUST NOTICED
Wait he does?
Excuse me, *what*
I love the theory, but you shouldn’t mix the words “protagonist” and “hero”, as well as “antagonist” and “villain”. The protagonist is just the main character, who the story is about, it doesn’t have to be the “good guy”. Specially with the several comic villains getting their own movies as protagonists, like the Joker, Suicide Squad, Venom, etc... (except this last one does turn him into the hero, but he still does a lot of bad thins before saving the Earth), Remy might be the real villain and Skinner the real hero, but that doesn’t change their protagonist and antagonist roles.
To add, the antagonist is just the person who opposes the protagonist.
i was just about to say this as protagonist just means main character and the antagonist is just the person who gets in the way of the main character i dont like when people confuse it and think antagonist just means bad guy i mean its not a big deal but it annoys me an example would be light yagami he is clearly the villain of death note but hes still the protagonist(some people think ryuk is the real protagonist but idc hes more of a deuteragonist) or in Steel Ball Run where the person who is the hero and villain is a bit muddled as Valentine does have good motives and is to an extent a better person than Johnny but Johnny is still the protagonist(Gyro might be the real protagonist but nevermind) and Valentine is still the antagonist
A solid point. The most blatant example I can think of is Megamind, where the whole point is that the villain is the protagonist.
Yeah this is true good things that you pointed this out.
Izabela Krawczyk or The Fast and The Furious, where criminals who are good at driving perform heists
I recently found out that rats are really awesome pets, if raised the right way anyway. Makes me wanna try to get one, but they're a ton of work that I just don't have time for.
Honestly, another good theory for this is, were the spots on Linguini's head where the motion control spots in his mind were? Did Remy luck out, or realistically, was he honing in on the points that focus more on other parts of the body?
I like to think about how strange Pixar movies would be if the plots were the same, but all the characters are humans
Just gonna say, Cars 2 is terrifying
Why did you bring this to my mind-
Monsters Inc and toy story are the first ones that came to mind for me
I mean, Cars? Bug's Life? Toy Story???
I mean, Cars? Bug's Life? Toy Story???
On Gordon Ramsey’s defense, Raj stuck his head in a freezer to “cool his mind”
And he made a Seafood Pancake, let's not forget that.
Oh god
That is Terrible
Remy doesn't care because remy is a higher life-form
@@rambisknocker9559 that could pee
People think Chef’s are mean but they’re actually the most caring people I’ve met they love making others happy and keeping them safe. Like Ramsey, he be screaming & shouting but is honestly for the good of the cooks and the diners. He’s even given opportunities to lots of people out there.
also, lots of contestants cant cook at and/or they have attitudes, like the woman who tried to slap gordon ramsey or the amount of times hes said something is raw; or when he called someone an idiot sandwich
What always amazes me about the Theory Channels is that the introductions are so well done. The Pixar-themed introduction was SO cool!
Remy: “I will seize my moment no matter what”
Ernesto de la Cruz: *yes*
Lol
Lol 🤣
Honestly now that you say that they do have strong similarities
hey wait this seems to be a trend with Pixar villians
And they both poisoned people too weird...
MattPat: Remy is a narcissist and a jerk.
Me: Oh, so just like most really skilled chefs then?
Gordon Ramsay is not narcissist and ajerk, just rude
@@petritibi
He curses ALOT but has charisma.
@@Raccon_Detective. sure but that doesnt make him a bad cook he's still very talented
@@petritibi And, he actually have a lot of self-control to his family and especially to children (both his and others)
The thing is Gordon Ramsay isn't really mean, he wants people to get better and learn. Also anything other than the American kitchen nightmares hes actually super chill and works with people.
So did we forget that Linguini is an adult who can make his own choices? He chose for Remy to control his movements and didn’t ask him for cooking lessons. Linguini also got all the credit for Remy’s work. You shouldn’t blame the rat for not telling a grown man how to live his life.
Yeah, tell that to everyone who has been manipulated by someone.
How can all this grown man and woman just accept that. Why do someone need to tell them how to live their lifes?
And who are those manipulators usually?
Oh right, repetitive liars and narcissists
@@moki4541 So would you prefer for Linguini to cook on his own? The movie makes it perfectly clear that he has no cooking talent whatsoever, and that Remy and Linguini’s team up is a good work-around.
@@mrepicdood9953 matpat already said he could have trained him but no he just uses him for his own purposes
@@Algous1 To be fair, Remy can't speak human. Besides, it's not like being a chef is the only job in a restaurant. Even if he was never meant to be a good chef, he sure did fine job as a waiter.
@@Algous1 Could also be that Linguini LITERALLY has no talent when it comes to cooking. LITERALLY. He might not be able to smell or taste very well (outside of his atrocity that was the original soup)
Don't forget that Skinner got Linguine drunk in order to get information out of him. I feel like that's a pretty bad thing to do.
Tru
Disney: “I fear no man”
“But that thing...”
Mat pat: (makes a video about Disney)
Disney: “it scares me”
They better be afraid, Disney got some questionable stuff
Lol
"Disney' Hippity hoppaty your videos my's propertie
@@benchmarkerlovesgaming140 pretty accurate
Ikr tho he is killing disney
I am contacting my lawyers to sue “Film Theory”.
Says the guy who has made several people sick, kidnapped and gagged two people, and left his entire pack for dead by not bothering to teach someone else how to check for poison
I guarantee, the lawsuit will end in rat poison
Remmy what you doin on film theory
REMY I THOUGHT I KNEW YOU!!!
Yesss get that coin from the defamation
I THOUGHT I COULD TRUST YOU!!!!
the chef actually did something very wrong, he knew Linguini was the actual son of Gusteau and was the true inheritor of the restaurant, but he hid Gusteau's lawyer's letter that stated that Linguini was the new owner
matpat missed the part that chef skinner tries to kidnap remy to cook at a new restaurant hes making.
I’m a huge schaffrilas fan and I was like “why is everyone doing ratatouille all of a sudden” when I saw this thumbnail
Lmao
Same! 🤣
I changed my profile pic cuz of schaf, day 32 fan. Subbed before 100k
Yeah but Skinner tried to hide Gusteau' will that stated that his children were to own the restaurant (linguine) which is very illegal. Plus when Skinner finds out that it was Remy who was cooking he captured him to have him slave out in his new restaurant, very selfish and money driven, this also proves that he doesn't care about food hygiene one of the points matt pat says that makes skinner the good guy.
Not only all of that but he was trying to find an excuse to fire Linguine or expose him (by getting him drunk) , he only found out about Remy because of his drive to get linguine fired!
@Edward Lee Miller woah woah woah did I miss something completely from this film (please elaborate).
@Boogeyman yeah but by the time Skinner finds out about the will LINGUINE has already tricked him, the other chefs and the public that he can cook and news about his soup makes business booming
i think we can all agree the only good guy is colette. bc she’s a badass
@Boogeyman Or would he? If someone happened to find out that Linguine was written into the will as the owner then the scandal would surely blow up. I don't think he would have kept him as the garbage boy if Linguine/Remi failed to replicate the soup, he would just throw him out making him out to be incompetent. This is all just speculation but if someone's name was written into a will and anyone notices that they weren't received the promise reward isn't' that a scandal in of itself? A will is (by law) required to be fully fulfilled unless debts were taken out for government purposes, Linguine's case doesn't fall under this. Gusteau was the sole proprietor of the franchise and so he has every right to give Linguine the restaurant. Does that mean that the business would fail? We don't know, after all Collette and Linguine both seem to be helping towards the end of the movie (it seems Linguine DID learn from Remi's repetitive actions) but regardless, by trying to change the will without permission of the original writer through unconventional means Skinner is still commiting a crime.
@Boogeyman bro stop calling it remi its REMY good lord
Hold up. Mat, I think you're forgetting that Skinner is also villainous in his own way and just as self-serving. If I'm remembering correctly there's a scene where Skinner kidnaps Remy and tries to use him to start a new business because he saw that he could manipulate Remy and take advantage of his talents in the kitchen.
That never happend
@@Flareguy You are wrong. Watch the movie.
@@jjjlove2260 I have this never happens
@@Flareguy Yes it definitely does. There is a specific scene where Skinner does cage Remy and tells him his plans. You don't remember.
To be fair, the plan failed. If memory serves, Remy was rescued. Just because he TRIED it did not mean that it never happened.
No, chef skinner did try to keep the secret of linguine owning the restaurant as he wanted to keep power. Also, I get he wanted to get rid of remy, but he made linguine DRUNK just to find a rat. When he reported the restaurant to the health inspector that wasn’t because he wanted to keep the customers safe. He didn’t own the restaurant at that point and wanted to get his revenge by shutting the restaurant down as linguine owns it.
I dont like arguing that Remy isnt the protagonist, because even if hes the villain he is technically still the protagonist. His pov is what the story is told from. Thats all it takes to solidify that title.
Though lookong past semantics, its a good video.
@@zackyona1916 from a pov following remy (aka) the movie he's the protagonist but a omniscient look at it says he's the antagonist
@@zackyona1916 to be the antagonist you have to be against the protagonist so Remy isn't the antagonist
haha remy bad brrr
And that guy is good guy protecting people from rat so you guys wrong
Im so abused
But didn't Skinner try to hide the fact that Linguni was Gusteau's son and he technically was the heir to the restaurant? And didn't Remy give Linguini the letter, which made him live in a mansion. Which is 20 times bigger than his little apartment.
But he only did so he could be the leader chef of the restaurant. And Skinner wanted to rescue the letter from a rat that was stealing it he didn't now that the rat was going to give the letter to linguine if Skinner didn't care he would just let Remy steal it because he thought that letter was going to get destroyed
Sebastian Hernandez
Skinner believed there was a connection between Remy and Linguini. He has ample reason to believe Linguini had something to do with Remy sneaking in.
Skinner knew Linguini couldn’t cook himself and that the restaurant would not last long in the hands of Linguini since people would eventually find out about Remy
No He Didn't At All He Was Actually Suprised
Remy: Mercy, PLEASE.
MatPat: There is no Mercy.
I am not gonna let you destroy my childhood once again, remy is a great character!
"Protagonist" just means main character and "antagonist" is just the character that opposes them. They aren't really interchangeable with "hero" and "villain."
Also, Skinner definitely tried to at least hide the evidence that Linguini was the rightful heir, which is why Remi stole it from him.
But didn't Linguini's mother ask not to tell him?
They didn't try to make Remy look like a good guy either lmao
Join join jilyi
YAAS
that's why he calls this a "theory", not a "fact".
I'm just waiting for Schaffrillas Productions to comment at this point
I'm glad I'm not the only one 😂
Me too.
Just ask the director opinion on this theory LMAO
same man
To be honest even though a Schaff would be mad at the theory he’d probably be happy that a bigger channel like Film Theory is promoting his channel for free, it’s not even the first time MatPat has done that
I kept telling you guys I wasn’t evil but NoOoOo let’s keep letting remy spread the PlAgUe
Actually Skinner did do one wrong thing, upon learning that the garbage boy Linguini was actually gusteau's biological son, he did try to prevent him from inheriting it by hiding the letter until it was too late for the will to be contested and he could remain in charge and sole owner, but he didn't destroy the evidence that's true, so aside from that his crime largely is just looking like a villain
And the rats should definitely have sanitized more but it was possible they could have been clean
I have a reason WHY Remy is the protagonist. It’s because the definition of protagonist isn’t good or bad it just means the person who the story follows and try to move the story forward (hints “pro” which mean forward). And antagonist is the person trying to stop them from moving the plot forward. A good example of this is Suicide Squad where they aren’t really the “good guys” but they still are the protagonists
not true.. the protagonist is the hero the antagonist is the bad guy.
when you said “it’s because the definition of protagonist isn’t good or bad it just it means the person who the story follows.
so when you said the protagonist is the person isn’t good or bad. No because even if the story follows a villain it’s still the antagonist.
Honestly either way there would have been a story long or short idk
👀
👄
@@raykayproductions652 sorry man you are wrong. The op is right. Protaganist literally means "the leading character" regardless they are good or bad.
@@maheshwaranp3946 well then the leading Character SUCKS..
Maheshwaran P ok i’m not friend to brag but...my uncle is a director he forces me to learn all these terms about antagonist and protagonist. i’ve also studied these :/
Childhood movie nostalgia: exists
MatPat: "So, you have chosen death."
Well, it does say ruining your childhood since 2011 😆
This comment is so overused
“Grumpy old matpat is here to ruin another animated family film from my childhood as usual!!” An quote
Mattpatt conveniently forgets to mention skinner’s biggest crime, trying to deny the fact that linguni is gusteau’s son, even though he had undeniable proof (the dna test) just so that he can become the owner of the restaurant and be gusteau’s sole heir!!!!!
Protagonist doesn’t mean there’s a good guy it means they’re the main character of the story. The antagonist is whoever is opposed to the protagonist that also doesn’t mean that necessarily an antagonist is the bad guy. Take Death Note,Light is the protagonist because he’s the main character of the story while L is the antagonist because he is in opposition to Light.
True
Yes
Yes, thanks for pointing this out.
Stolen comment
Not cool
*I love how so many people said “first” when the first person to comment said “bruh”*
vGodFN okay but if she breaks her word let me know riot on the mother
Didn't you ask the same question on another comment?
he commented and i quote “EARLY”
It just isn’t the first comment though also vGodFN don’t comment this on every post
vGodFN then don’t self promote
Lightning strikes at the most inconvenient and random of time
MatPat: REMY IS A KILLER
Idk what it takes nor how much money, when I grow up I am making a movie that film theory CANT RUIN
Disney characters: exist
Matpat: peace was never an option
i looked at your videos
Flying Cockroach You really got suckered with that reverse psychology, didn’t you?
*cries in pixar
Didn't Skinner only give Linguini a chance so he could humiliate himself?
he did give him a chance and (begrudgingly) accept the outcome
Also didn’t he try to stop him from finding out he is the son of gusteau?
He also kept Linguini from knowing he was of rightful ownership of the restaurant.
Claiming Skinner was a good person was the stretch of the century, not nearly as offensive as Mat saying Gordon Ramsey is an unlikable chef though.
Skinner also only gave Linguini a chance after reading the room and seeing that his employees would lose the respect they had for him if he didn't
I have a complaint about skinner:
When he tastes the soup, he uses the spoon which was already used by Collete. This goes against EU food safety rules.
(other than that, I agree with you).
But... Remmy didn't go to become a chef intentionally... He lost his way, and since he thought he had lost his family, he deciced to have his own new life.
Counter argument
The protagonist is not necessarily the "good guy" in the story, the protagonist is just the main character and likewise the antagonist is not the "bad guy" they are just the providing conflict to the protagonist
Edit* ergo Remmy is still the protagonist skinner is still the antagonist
this needs to be higher up
This was literally what I was thinking at the beginning of the video. Mat went too far that he forgot the simple definition of protagonist and antagonist
Example: the joker
Kind of ironic seeing thats its more of a correction than a counter argument.
@@angellively6746 but my correction negates his entire argument of Remmy not being the protagonist
"Skinner did nothing wrong"
Besides being a bad chef, terrible boss, drugging an employee for information, committing corporate espionage (after he was fired, he spent half his time spying on Linguini and the restaurant), corporate sabotage (calling the health inspector, which would be a crime since the information he received was through illegal means and was done with the intention of shutting down the restaurant), mail theft, violating his boss and mentor's will, and a number of traffic violations and possible attempted assault. Dude barely did the bare minimum for his job and only saw the dollar signs. Remy may not be a hero but neither is Skinner.
Artemis Or Whatever I agree completely. I remember not liking him for gis actions too. So the question now is, who really is the hero? Or does this movie not have a hero?
MatPat is just Smart people overthinking stuff
To the person reading this: Your skin isn't a paper don't cut it Your body isn't a book don't judge it Your heart isn't a door don't lock it Your life isn't a movie don't end it You are beautiful and don't allow anyone bring you down Be you...stay safe! [ I am a poor gamer and play on intel hd graphics if i got 1000 sub my mom will help me get a new pc pls help i am very poor doing child labour at 12 :( ] I didn't create this quote Just wanna spread positivity💖 😇 edit (check my chnl i recently uploaded a meme about nvidia)
Imagine taking a TH-cam video seriously enough to write a whole novella about how it is incorrect.
@@Blaketarded imagine making a 18 minutes video giving extremely biased information and then adding a two minutes fortnite ad at the end.
Another thing that was forgotten was how Skinner kidnapped Remy for personal gain. I can't remember what for specifically, but it was a very nefarious reasoning.
10:46 he only pretended to admit he was wrong because Colette put him in a situation where he wasn’t going to get his way so his only option was to just go with it
If I remember correctly, Remmy was separated from his family when they ran from the old woman at the beginning of the movie. He tried to follow them but the water pushed him down the other path. He didn't exactly run away.
Yeah but the rest is still true
Vertia the Green yup
he never tried to find them though
Eventually he found them and didn’t go back still
@@thatoneguywiththevoice328 No its not, actually. I like Matt and all but this is honestly one of the most lazily and inaccurate theory he's made.
MatPat: Reveals Epic Games' master plan
Epic Games: "If we give you money will ya shut up!?!"
Funny
@@eys6813 did I just got rick rolled by your profile pic :|
@@Pibbypaws yes yes you did
that's rude to mat pat
@@eys6813 u reminded me of how rick astley himself got rickrolled on reddit
4:47 LOL THE WAY HE SAID IT
Skinner only cared about money and his reputation. He wasn't the good guy either. And he tried to get rid of Linguini when he found out that the restaurant actually belonged to him. Big detail to leave out matpat. Never seen you do that before.
You glossed over the part where was trying to not only withhold Linguini’s birth right from him, but also the fact that he knew his father was so that he could keep the restaurant for himself.
Exactly what I was thinking. :)
Yeah but would it really have been responsible to give up his life's work to some random guy who could suddenly cook when he was doing a decent job getting the restaurant in its new business direction
@@ThEaWeSoMeNeSs11111 Skinner could of still had a job as the head chef at the Resturant even if Linguini technically owned it. It just would of meant that he had less money and had to go through someone else to get frozen food products passed.
Linguini never would of had to cook a thing. Skinner did it out of greed.
I’m not at all advocating that Skinner denying Linguini his birth right is at all right but I don’t think he was in the wrong either, if anything he was trying to protect the business from falling into unreliable ownership. It takes more than knowledge in the kitchen to run a successful restaurant you also have to be business savvy or at the very least hire someone to handle it. Linguini does not have a business education and has been fired a staggering amount of times, he’s doesn’t have the formal education or work experience to run a successful restaurant.
@@WolfDragon-iz7wq that doesn't change the fact that Skinner stole the restaurant from him. If he wanted it so bad, and he wasn't the bad guy, he could have bought it from him.
the fact that he STARTS the video off apologizing to another content creator for putting out a video contrasting their video just out of coincidence shows how great a guy Pat is
Yahoo its pat (no ofence i just díd it as a Joke
@@mariamarquez7889 i don't know if i have any idea what you said, so no offense taken lol
Watching this right after watching schaff's video is honestly just hilarious
Pat
Do you mean when he talks about food theory? If so, that is his own channel he is talking about, not someone else's.
Whoever edited that intro with the Pixar lamp, you deserve points for nostalgia and a raise.
Fun fact:
The sword Skinner was given in 12:10 is actually the Polish coronation sword called "Szczerbiec" which also has an interesting story to it
The Message of the movie: Anyone can cook
Linguini: *Someone who actually can't cook and has to be controlled by a rat*
You know your a lost cause when a rat that lives in the sewers can cook better then you...
@@damondgreen2239
But it's just a movie that helps kids believe that they can cook.
somebody didn't pay attention to the end.
Anyone can cook ; not everyone can become a great artist, but a great artist can come from anywhere
LOLGamer YT i agree kids are rats! jk jk. unless?
might be a Film Theory but like.... dang, he's not wrong XD
He is saying it like Kairos
If I may intervene, I would like to say that near the end of the movie, Skinner does kidnap Remy to make the rat make frozen food for Skinner's own gain.
@@fireballrosenquist207 skinner also uses gusteau as just a marketing tool and is basically just a money hungry little man
@@isuckatmakinghandles
To play devil's advocate, Skinner is trying to make money by expanding the business as a whole; he's not solely trying to line his own pockets.
But... Skinner also tries to cheat Linguini out of his inheritance. So...
@@masahiruQwQ hello there fellow brawl stars fan :)
I can watch these videos all over and over and still be entertained
I’ve been binging these for more than a day i love these
Skinner got a letter from Renata asking him not to disclose the fact that Alfredo is Auguste's son. The events of the movie are speculated to happen around 2007 and the French inheritance law gives the rights to Alfredo of 50%. The fact that Skinner is a good business man and that the letter asks him to hide Alfredo's inheritance does not give him the right to full ownership and this is the reason why Skinner is portrait as the villain or antagonist in this movie. I am not 100% sure that my point is correct but I hope you didn't omit this just to make your point in this video and IF I am right I believe that this information should have a place in the video and not portrait Skinner in such a good light even though I agree on some points about Remy.
K
Exactly
Someone said it
This is what I was so confused about while watching the video
Upgrade your speculation of the history of events is wrong, since all Disney movies are canonically connected you would of noticed Bombvoyarge during his his mime career (from the Incredibles) if you say it's 2007 that would mean he would be 80+ years old, yet he looks younger than 40 (Incredibles takes place the 1950's)
Soooo, skipping the scene where he manipulates Linguine with alcohol? No? We’re not gonna talk about that? O-ok 👌
That's perfectly fine, it was consensual
this whole video is biased anyway
Hara Yanto it might’ve seemed like it to the viewers and Linguine but it was actually a form of psychological manipulation. This type of manipulation is more subtle but nonetheless it can still be very harmful especially if the situation turns out very bad. The victim will end up feeling like whatever went wrong was their fault in the end resulting in more harm than what was already done. This was a real life example but back to the cartoon. In this case Linguine was refusing alcohol and stopped at a decent amount of it too. He knew when to stop and how much he could take. Skinner however continued to press and insist. Given the way Linguine is and the power level Skinner has over Linguine it would make it impossible to refuse. It’s much like a patient dating their therapist, it’s illegal because the patient isn’t on the same level as them making refusing difficult and not fair. He manipulated him in efforts to get information out of him. Personal information that wasn’t his to know. He intoxicated him by making it seem like it was Linguine’s choice when it really wasn’t. Sorry for the psychology report but it’s kind of concerning you though this to be consensual when it wasn’t at all in any way. You can’t look at the surface level of human emotion, psychology, etc. It goes far deeper.
Ethan G. I agree 100%. He skipped out all of the devious things Skinner had done. Manipulate, withhold important information probably more. I’ve always felt sympathy for him even as a child and didn’t see him as “evil” or a “villain” per say but he wasn’t any better than Remy. We need to remember Remy is a rat. No matter how human he may act. He wasn’t raised with the same morals humans have. He isn’t human so why would he care about “stealing”. He stated he did but part of me feels like him saying that was his efforts to be more ‘human.’ None of the rats truly cared wether they stole or not, not even the dad, the only reason he didn’t was because of the threat humans posed, NOT because of morality.
@@neriumprotostar he can read and understand english, i dont doubt hes aware of human morals as well
Kid Character Protagonists:**Exists**
Matpat:IT’S EVIL,EVIL I TELL YOU
Dang, I guess this shows how if you put a not so great character in a protagonist role and then actually okay person as an antagonist you won't realize what kind of character they actually are.
“Skinner does nothing wrong”
Yeah, besides hiding Gusteaus will...
Edit: hide->hiding becides->besides
Thank you! That was my point!
Correct it to besides not becides
I'm pretty sure in the letter from linguini's mom she doesn't ask Skinner to tell linguini that gustea is his father, she just asks him to let linguini to work there
edit: i just checked the scene and linguini's mother specifically asks Skinner not to tell linguini, so i think Skinner has every right to not mention it
@@thewarlord3719 what about Linguini's right to know who his dad is?
@@artyomchyornyj9264 like i stated, linguini's mom literally asks skinner not to tell him (respect the dead man). also legally skinner has no obligation.
MatPat: It's everything a great G-rated movie should be.
Ratatouille: Rated PG in Australia.
Dumb Fricker Nearly (Nearly, not every.) every Disney film is G-rated.
@@zarzok The Land Before Time was rated G. Somehow.
@@Nukepositive wat the heak
Guys, Seko Seko 7 is a bot. Go ahead and report them.
Its just more bloody over here mate
Didn't Remy get lost, not leave his family? It's also explicitly stated that no one has been poisoned in Remy's absence.
Great theory i like the way you explain these theories deeper for others to understand
also, skinner was trying to get linguine to lose his job before he ever suspected a rat was helping him and he also only tried to catch the rat so he could get rid of linguine
right, he didn’t let him cook bc he was genuinely giving him a chance, he was setting him up to be humiliated if his food was bad. i wouldn’t really say that’s a good guy quality
I mean, wouldn't you be upset if some stranger came and cheated through your own field of work/study without a single degree? Like Linguine was legit going to take Skinner's job even though he's never cooked a decent meal a day in his life and instead had a rat do the work for him.
Yeah, and Skinner was trying to cover up Gusteau's will that would give linguine his birthright.
@@Phoenix_of_Sun Yeah and there's another theory that Skinner was the one who murdered Gusteau, which makes more sense than him just dying by disappointment
not to mention that the frozen food bit was to sell out with cheap food, exploiting and farther ruining gusteau's name for a quick buck and not what matpat said
Matpat: Remy is an unsanitary narcissist who only cares about his art
Me: Okay but he's French so we been knew.
Ok that was funny lol
Melde
DONT LIKE it's at 420 :)
lmaoooooooo 😂😂
th-cam.com/video/xwucYzvNusM/w-d-xo.html
@@remydupart1853 ??
The only thing I disagree with here is that Skinner actively hid legal documents that he was responsible to bring forth, especially after he made them conclusive beyond a reasonable doubt by cross-referencing the will, the letter, and the DNA tests. However, I could even excuse this by him actively trying to make sure that Linguini was on the level when he had a reasonable suspicion about a serious threat.
I like it how matpat tells Remi ''You don't stand a chance"
Is no one gonna talk about how Epic sponsored MatPat right after he did a whole episode on Game Theory exposing them?
Nah, they know the risks and they agreed with it, I guess. But they keep doing it for a better reason than what MatPat can see.
And they recognize his ability as a marketing channel too.
Nothing strange here.
Lol
Epic Games:"We need to get MatPat back on our side!"
Random Employee:"Oh I know! We should sponser him!"
Epic Games:"Brilliant!"
"Any exposure is good exposure"
Porygon Z but he already was
Peaceful Disney character: exists
Matpat: "that's SATAN"
Evil Character: Exsists
Also Matpat: *That’s* *Jesus* *Right* *There*
Actually i always knew remy was bad
@@redly3615 nice
this made me laugh. thanks :D
he's like the water boys mamma🤣
You made me watch all of the animations again with another eye OMG
How can MatPat use extreme mathematics to explain things like how Sonic's actually slow, but then confuse the meaning of protagonist and antagonist? Even if Remy is the villain, he'd still be the protagonist. The protagonist is the character the story features around, which could potentially be a villain. The antagonist is the opposer of the protagonist, which would still be Chef Skinner.
He hides that fact that linguine is gusteau's son so he can run the restaurant by himself that is illegal
Exactly. As for why he doesn't destroy the evidence despite the fact it would solve the problem, as they say in Pitch Meetings "Because".
@@eaglescout1984 That works.
Mando means Mandalorian
Most likable protagonist
@@eaglescout1984 Ignoring plot holes is tight
The problems here are 1. The assumption that someone can be "trained" to have a biologically sensitive nose. The story implies he was born a super smeller/taster.
2. The assumption Remy can teach anyone to cook. He tried and failed to teach rats he can actually talk to (he doesnt speak human, remember?) He tries and fails to teach Linguini because they can't communicate with "bite means no".
3. Protagonist doesn't mean "good person." An antihero can be the protagonist. It just means we see the story from their perspective.
This, this right here.
Thank you
Same for Antagonist and “Bad person”. An antagonist can be a good person, but they are the villain of the story as it is told from the side of the protagonist.
1. im certain that a rat as smart as remy can teach this skill to an exent, just as we can improve our vision, hearing, creativity, etc.
2. that's actaully a good point. he did try. but all because he tried dosen't mean that that excuses him for leaving his colony at a serious risk.
3. that's true. we saw the movie from remy's perspective and saw him chase his dreams, while the movie did'nt focus on skimmer, it dosen't change the fact that he was actaully a good person. usaully the protaginist is a good guy but not always.
sorry if my typing is hsit ive had too much teqila
Can he also talk about how Skinner wants to keep the restaurant all fro himself instead of Linguini yet MatPat fails to defend that
One flaw, skinner kidnaps remi and wants him to come up with and cook new frozen food ideas. He is doing it for money
Wow... you have opened my eyes once again
In the case of teaching Linguini, the phrase 'anyone can cook' is explained by Ego in his review: "Not everyone can become a great artist, but a great artist can come from anywhere."
I wouldn’t trust a rat who controls me by pulling my hair either
lol sureeee
nice try clout baiter but i dont think you're gonna earn much likes
well yea maybe a month in the future
@vGodFN
S H U T
Me too
My hair would die
3:39 that would kinda make Remy a hypocrite huh…
just a little distinction: The whole phrase is "Everyone can cook" But as Ego explain at the end, its not that everyone can become a great chef, but a chef can come from anywhere, Remy understands the meaning from the start that Linguini cant cook, but a chefcan come from evenn a rat
The rat isn’t Ratatouille, it’s Ratatouille’s monster
Ratatouille is the princess
Hahaha
Isn’t the rat called remy?
Kk
Ella Grace woosh
Just like to say: that clip you showed of skinner “accepting he was wrong” is him trying to manipulate linguini
It really bugged me that Matpat said that was him admitting he was wrong.
I mean if I was head chef and the clumsy garbage boy suddenly became a master cook, I would want to test him like that too
I mean, Matpat is really bending the story to call Skinner the hero. Like really, no way was he good. If he were good, he'd tell Linguine about his dad. Instead, a rat stole a letter and told him instead. Maybe he didn't have to act legally, but I feel morally, he had to. No, want a hero? Colette. Colette is the hero, so says I.
Can someone explain to me how Skinner was manipulating Linguini in that clip? Please and thank you.
@@michace he was trying to get him to tell he had a rat helping him or something like that he was just trying to get him to tell that there's a rat in his hair
I love just looking through yt and seeing your channel and I just love it when you tell me that like wali is about cannibalism and murder
chef Skinner hides the fact that linguine is gustos son I think it's been a while since I've seen the movie and he tries to stop Remy from delivering that piece of paperwork I'm not trying to be that well actually guy
Gets sponsored by Fortnite right after doing a theory about Epic Game’s plan to take over. Hmmm... It makes you think 🤔
Yeah like dang how much did they pay him
Hes right that means
Tryin' to get Mat off there tale
Matpat 2 years ago: makes a theory about Dorothy being faking lost of memories
Matpat now: Remy is evil
Me: *feels nostalgia*
👏👏👏👏👏👏
It really does
What
nice pfp
10:46 HE DOESNT MEAN IT HE IS ONLY TRYING TO LOOK GOOD IN FRONT OF HIS STAFF
(sorry i wrote his in capital lock, couldn't be bothered to re write it)
What about the fact that Skinner was hiding the truth from Linguini that he was related to Gusteau? That surely wasn’t above board was it? Sure he didn’t destroy the letter, but he had absolutely no intention of ever letting Linguini know the contents of said letter.