I know Cedric's death scene wasn't that powerful But you gotta admit that when Harry and Cedric return from the maze and the band plays the upbeat music It's super eerie when everyone slowly figures out what's going on whilst such a happy tune is playing
i didn't care about cedrick that much in the movie either, but his dad's actor crying for real teared me up a bit, that cry felt like he really lost his son, props for the actor
I just love how Harry comes back with dead Cedric and everyone is cheering, the band is playing, and no one really notices for the first few moments that Harry is hunched over a dead body.
Mate, Amos Diggory absolutely STOLE that scene. Incredible performance. He knew he only had a couple scenes and had to make the most of it, but still didn't 'over-act' it, he smashed it perfectly. Really gave that scene the emotion it needed.
The end of Prisoner of Azkaban is a glorious film. The ending where Harry thinks his dad is coming but he has to step up himself is simply brilliant. As someone who lost his father at a young age, its a very emotional scene.
i used to dislike azkaban because it meant their world was deterministic, but I've come to believe free will is only an illusion so i like it a lot more now.
At the point where he thinks its his dad he doesn't know Hermione is time traveling. I think I have that timeline right in my head. I love this book so much@@teamrocketsslowpoke2773
I absolutely love the scene where Snape comes out of the Shrieking Shack and is angry at Harry and about to scold him before seeing the danger and instantly switching into a defensive mode where his only priority is protecting the kids. It really helps to show how layered his character is.
@Dorel abramov yeah a lot of movies fans don’t understand that Snape literally terrorized and antagonized his students in the books that wasn’t show in the movies
@@justastudent1423 not in the book????? it must be bad then! thank god we have an intellectual like you who has the ability to read so that us common folk can finally understand what is good and what is bad.
Funniest thing about HP is that Voldemort lost so badly to Harry in his first two years at Hogwarts, that he didn’t even bother to try anything in the third year. He just decided to take a break that year.
bro had his horcrux killed without harry even knowing what it is, on top of cheating death for a 2nd time and killing a giant snake with insta-kill eye contact. if i were him, i'd take a break too
Not that he could have done much if anything since he didn''t have his physical form and his ability to interact with the physical world was severely limited and requiring external help in order to do so. Quirrell was gone and so was the Philosophers Stone, His diary destroyed so by PoA he had already exhausted most of his available options until Wormtail found him the following summer
@@vikkran401 Exactly. To add to that as well, Voldemort didn't even know the diary had been destroyed until after he was reborn and found out Lucius no longer had it. Voldemort says that after the events of the Philosopher's Stone he had pretty much given up until Wormtail found him.
But think of how many shots you could get off in the time it takes someone to say 6 syllables. Even if the first one doesn't kill them it'll probably stop them from forming words
Ehhh it makes sense. It really gears into the grand story that completes the franchise and what makes it so great, but the story isn’t flawless and these flaws naturally show as the story gets grander.
Remus Lupin's name is double on the nose. You caught the "Lupin=wolf" thing, but he's also named after Remus, brother of Romulus, the mythical founders of Rome... who were raised by wolves.
Sometimes Rowling is rly great at giving her characters thoughtful and meaningful names and then sometimes she goes and names a character fucking Cho Chang like wtf
JK Rowling names shit like this. What's the most obvious correlation to this character in english? Switch it to Latin, BOOOM. I mean sirius black LITERALLY MEANS BLACK DOG
Voldemort never told anyone about his horcruxes he just gave the book to Lucius to take care of it and keep it safe. Lucius just wanted to get rid of it because the ministry was making house raids to find illegal objects in wizard families. So Lucius didn't know what he was doing. One of many mistakes Voldemort made because he never trusted anybody.
To this day I'm upset that Hermione is the one who explained being a mudblood and not Ron. Because Ron isn't stupid in the books and his role in the trio is supposed to be the one talking about wizarding culture
So, JK Rowling has admitted that she very strongly considered killing off Ron in book 4. My personal theory, and this is a little tinfoil hatty, is that in her original draft, Ron was going to be selected to be the Hogwarts champion, then when Harry's name comes out of the goblet as well, that's why Ron loses his shit at Harry. It's a much stronger motivation, because after all these years, Ron finally has a chance at glory, and Harry has to swoop in and steal the spotlight yet again. Then they slowly make up over the course of the book, and at the climax, it's Harry and Ron who seize the cup together as a symbol of their renewed friendship... Then BAM. Graveyard. Ron is fucking ICED. Voldemort's back. And this catapults us into the darker, more adult section of the series. However, JK probably didn't want to put her readers through that shit, so she took a minor character from book 3 and elevated him to main character status and sacrificed him instead, and that's why Cedric feels so underwritten and out of place, and also why Ron's sudden falling out with Harry feels a little out of left field. Honestly, even as a child, I got over Credric's death really fast. Again, this is a tiny amount of fact combined with a large dose of speculation, but I think it all fits. Edit: for this storyline to be possible, there would have to be no minimum age requirement, or the minimum would have to be 14.
This makea sense. I remember in book three or four or five (?) Ron did show some jealousy. In book 1 didn't he see himself in the mirror as a quidditch player? Something like this would have worked a lot more.
That’s too bad if that’s the case. I think it definitely would have raised the stakes of the story a lot more and then Cedric could have, as Marcus suggested, come in and be even more chummy with Harry and help Harry through a potentially cool character arc and we wouldn’t have the cringeworthy Hermione/Ron romance. What a wasted opportunity.
It wouldn’t make sense for one reason. It doesn’t make sense in terms of all the movies. These movies were mystery movies. You’ll be taking away from that if you do that plot
@@atharvadeshpande4749 yeah, but still not to the point where I, reading as a kid, felt genuinely sad and shocked when he suddenly died, instead of a general, "oh damn, shit just got REAL" feeling. He definitely was more fleshed out in the books, but making him a bit more sympathetic with more dialogue would've made the emotional impact so much better.
As someone who only saw the movies, even as a kid I didn't feel... anything, when Cedric died. I don't think I felt sad in the slightest. To me Viktor, Fleur, and Cedric all felt like disposable background characters who were just there for this one movie to advance the plot and that's about it. The movie really wanted you to despair at the death of Cedric, to a degree that you'd only ever actually feel if it were Ron or Hermione that died. But since it was just this lame character we barely knew, the level of sadness they wanted you to feel was completely unjustified and unearned. Cedric was always disposable.
Voldemort didnt give him the Horocrux to give to Ginny, he gave it to Lucius for safekeeping. Lucius, assuming Voldemort was gone, passed it onto Ginny to frame her father for having dark artifacts. Lucius was never aware that it was a horocrux. Also it IS established that the Time Turners can only go so far back, except for black market illegal ones, which are confiscated and destroyed.
its weird that he keeps referencing the books for certain parts so he's clearly read them, but then points out plot holes and calls JK an idiot but those plot holes aren't in the books...?
Ah yes, the illegal black market time turners that are so illegal and so black market that they simply *must* be destroyed and absolutely *cannot* be used to destroy the greatest threat to the wizard world and humanity at large ever. Because they're black market. And illegal.
Yeah, the point was that Lucius was nervous of his house being searched, so he wanted to frame the Weasley’s so they would be searched instead. This backfired because after Mr Weasley learned about the book he put in an anonymous tip about Lucius that got his house searched
@@jeremiahvaleska8464 I feel like the only decent one was Aladdin. It was actually inventive the new parts that were added, and the new songs were pretty good.
Honestly, Goblet of Fire is just as good, if not better than Prisoner of Azkaban. Order of the Phoenix and the Half-Blood Prince are completely worthless, though
@@mattfromwiisports4911 Are you literally just restating the opinions of Cosmonaut. Also, I don't need to know what "is" as good as Prisoner, it's my opinion so don't be annoying
I actually like that Harry and Cedric's relationship was distant and awkward, with Harry being very jealous of Cedric from time to time. Cedric is everything he's not, and you see Harry experience an inferiority complex for the first time. He's the chosen one but he feels very small standing next to Cedric Diggory, who's practically perfect in every way.
I think ur 100% on the money with the kind of relationship they have but the issue with alot of book to screen adaptations is that inner thought is hard to convey on screen. I've never read the books but I'm sure theres alot of inner dialog from Harry talking about his jealousy. Someday a film maker will figure out how to ace that translation. The movie did the best it could I'm sure.
I remember when I asked this as a cute little 5 dollar donation during a stream only to receive a polite “No.” He took the time to read my donation and find it through the mass of comments just to reply. And I didn’t mind one bit. I was just glad to have asked him and got an answer. But then he did it anyway. And yeah, I know this has been a popular request in general but I’m happy none the less to have at least contributed. Years later, he’s actually reviewing these movies. Cosmonaut, I’ve subscribed for years and I just want to say thank you. I don’t know if you’re gonna even see this but thank you. One of my favorite reviewers, even if we don’t always agree. Keep up the awesome content.
Thats only a movie Snape move instead of a book Snape move. Personally I like movie Snape better because just because a characters more complex doesn't mean I have to like him, so I'll take my honorable Snapes any day, even if I mainly focus on the books
@@channeleditor9335 I imagine that most people who like Snape do so *only* due to his more heroic interpretation in the movies in addition to Alan Rickman's performance that was so good that Snape-lovers transpose him over the far pettier asshole that Snape actually is in the books. It's so pervasive that it even applies to Rowling herself given she admitted while the movies were going on that she had increasing trouble separating Rickman's performance from Snape in the books.
@@athenajaxon2397 Snape doesn't deserve much justice imo. He was a 'racist' nazi who only stopped being a nazi when his crush was threatened (so not even because he realised being 'racist' was wrong lmao), then spent years abusing children as a teacher. Snape is a complex character, which is good, but he's an asshole who got what he deserved. Also I don't really like that scene because him protecting them doesn't square with his constant abuse.
@@caoisekamay1175 yes the true snape doesn't deserve justice, the movies didn't give him justice but created a new snape, which isn't the best when making adaptations. However the past has already happened and movie Snape is more likable, which wasn't supposed to happen and misses the point, but we can enjoy simpler things like Rickman snape, and acknowledge that this isn't the real snape
To be fair, Daniel Radcliffe himself has said he's not fond of his earlier performances in the series because he was just breaking into the film industry and his acting is pretty rough.
When people started recommending Harry Potter to me, I always heard about Harry being in a relationship with Cho, or Herimone, or even MALFOY. Not once did anyone mention Ginny, and I was genuinely confused when I found out she was to be Harry’s love interest
It’s because of the movies. Harry is very interested in Cho until after the Tri-Wiazard Tournament. He never had any crush for Hermione, the movies just made it look like they had potential for something other than friendship
@@Mialikesthings Honestly, half the students make for a better pairing with Harry than Ginny. I'm somewhat partial to Luna x Harry but even Neville would be an improvement to what we got.
The fact that you said “the Barty Crouch subplot” hurts. The goblet of fire book is not even primarily about the tournament, it’s about the ministry with crouch, bagman, and fudge. The movie took all of that and reduced it to three scenes that add almost nothing to the movie. This is why goblet of fire is my least favorite movie
Agreed. That and a bunch of the other subplots in the book really add to the story. They cut out the Crouch Family history, Sirius' connection, and Winky.
YES. I remember getting really into all the Crouch mistery in the book, they were a very nice addiction to the tournament stuff and the other subplots. The movie butchered it
Another terrible thing that GOF does is that it makes the “Moody is actually crouch” plottwist so obvious. Not only do you see him twice before being told later that he died, but Moody is introduced by walking into the great Hall and having his eye focus on Harry, which he later says is for spotting his enemies. It’s the most obvious twist every and what makes it word is that it was done very well in the book
I think that even though Cedric is a mediocre 2D character, his death scene is just fucking tragic. First Cedric is murdered pretty brutally, and when Harry and Cedric get back (with Harry lying on top of Cedric), Cedric is dead and Harry is in a fuck ton of pain, physically and emotionally. We transition from one of the darkest scenes in the series (the graveyard scene) to everyone (including Cedric's dad) clapping and cheering, and the band playing an upbeat triumphant song. The juxtaposition is perfect. And when Hagrid becomes the first to notice something is wrong, we know shit is about to go down. The band quickly stops as they realize someone is hurt, and the adults (Fudge and Dumbledore) quickly realize he is dead. Fudge wants to keep it quiet as a deadly, suspenseful silence permeates the audience as they all try to see what happens. And then Cedric's dad, with no regard to anything, pushes through people to get to his dead son. His screams and cries of anguish are perfect acting. And when he shouts about his son, the audience realizes Cedric is dead; we pan over their reactions as they realize Cedric has been killed. The audience's sorrow then contradicts with the aesthetics of the scene: most of them are wearing colorful clothes and they have Gryffindor and Hufflepuff flags and tattoos for the celebration of the final tournament. Again, amazing visual juxtaposition. And Harry, in one last desperate attempt to save Cedric, tries to cling to his body and not let go. So, even though I didn't care much about Cedric, this scene made me feel terrible for him and for everyone who knew him.
I think the whole point of Cedric’s death was how sudden and shocking it was. He was just a regular kid. There was no buildup to his death at all. It was shocking to see a kid die just like that. It was a great introduction for Voldemort.
@@bobgenghiskhan1397 I think it also serves to demonstrate to the other Hogwarts kids that the plot has effects on people other than the main characters.
I'm kinda conflicted on it. On one hand, I totally agree with what you said. On the other hand, I agree that some of that power is lost by movie Cedric not really being significant enough to REALLY rack up that emotion. That all being said, I managed to develop an attachment to Cedric in the books (he was under-utilized there as well, but they gave enough to me to feel invested in him anyway), and that was enough to make me latch onto movie Cedric regardless, so... I cried at his death scene. I hope that all makes sense! My wording isn't always the best haha ^__^;;
tbf they didnt really seem to give a flying fuck about Ron. what they had like 2 years to see him on the map ever? Probably didnt give af what their 11 year old brother was doing in his bed at night
I actually really agree with the Cedric part. Cedric should've been Harry's new 'best friend' while he was estranged from Ron. That would've hit harder at the end since it would've shown that this type of thing could easily happen to Ron & Hermione, also showing to Harry that he can't always protect his friends. Goddamn, that would've been cool.
Looking at their relationship, this seems really close to being set up, but then it just never really comes together. They're set up as rivals even before Goblet of Fire, since they're on opposing houses and quidditch teams. In the tournament, they're not just competing against each other. Cedric believes Harry cheated to enter the competition, which causes even more conflict. All the factors that made them rivals; however, could have contributed to them being really good friends. They have similar interests and values. They start to burry the hatchet and help each other, but they it never grows beyond each person performing a favor for the other.
I agree that it would have been cool but it would not have worked in a realistic sense. Cedric is this cool, popular jock like kid who is 2 or 3 years older than Harry. Harry is hated by all of Hufflepuff house (aka Cedric's house) and is a joke to everyone else because he's a scrawny little 14 year old who's the fourth contestant in a TRIwizard Tournament. Those two wouldn't be friends. Of course you can make the argument that that hanging out with the guy his entire house hates is what would make Cedric the nice and likable guy whose death would impact us, the audience. But then, the age difference is still an issue. A 16-17 year old just randomly hanging out with a 14 year old in school is kind of weird.
@@hittingyouoverthehead I don't think any of that's an issue since if they made this a goal of the story, it would be altered in whatever way to suit it. Like it is currently to suit the plot they went with, you know?
@@terryqokov6999 I assume you've finished your schooling? Can you imagine any situation where a 17 year old kid has just casually hung out with a 14 year old at school? Unless they're siblings or someone like a teacher asks one to tutor the other, have you seen them willingly just hanging out together? Does that seem realistic? If you're trying to say that Cedric can be made into a 14 year old to make this come through, then again, 1. He'd be in the same year as Harry so he wouldn't be so popular. Harry kind of steals the spotlight every time. 2. All students in the school (including the 7th years) fawning over him wouldn't make sense
@@hittingyouoverthehead No that's exactly why they'd have to change it to fit the new situation. You seem to be thinking they'll keep the current structure of the story but you can legit change it to work in whichever way you want.
The only thing I don't like about Prisoner of Azkaban is that they never explain the origin of the Maurader's Map or the nicknames and how they relate to Harry's parents and his patrons, I think that moment in the book was such a cool twist/reveal that really wrapped up the story threads like super nicely.
I’m a massive marauders fan and the amount of research I’ve had to do at the beginning of my obsession was extensive and really unnecessary because it should have just been explained
Yeah, the movies leave out so much cool and interesting. I get it, it's a movie so they have to pluck out the most important, but like how they handled wormtales death in the movies made me angry. Died in a "comedic" way. While how his fate in the book is so cool. He decides to help harry, but then his silver hand that Voldemort gave him sences betrayal, and then chokes him to death
To add to the "things Rowling added later that fucks with earlier stuff" pile: If Hogwarts did not originally have plumbing, then why is there a button on the sink to open the chamber of secrets? And what was covering the way in initially?
And who was the one that built the sinks? Because they had to have seen the hole and they had to go “Oh yes, a secret hole, I’ll make this sink a cover up that is accessible to anyone who figures it out!”
For me they're christmas movies because ABC Family always did a Harry Potter marathon as part of their "25 days of christmas". Now ABC Family is Freeform so I don't even know if they do that anymore.
ORORORORO!!! I spend half of my day sleeping! ORORORO!!! Then I sometimes get up and tell you that I am a famous content creatorORORORORO!!! Please don't sleep while driving, dear mania
I remember when I was a kid when Tom Riddle writes “I am Lord Voldemort”, I thought he was some punk kid trying to use the name to seem super cool, like he was a new villain but was trying to compare himself to Voldemort, but it didn’t work out with the fans cause he was so lame and that’s why JK went back to Voldemort being the main villain while Tom was some side story villain. Kind of like a Saturday morning cartoon or something I was a dumb child.
To be fair that's exactly what Tom Riddle was doing by giving himself the Voldemort name. Trying to make himself seem cool and scary and get away from the name he shared with the dad he hated and because he considered Tom such a common and ordinary name and in his arrogance thought he was better than that.
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is a really good movie. Not just a good Harry Potter movie, but a good movie. It's well directed, it's shot good, it has amazing visuals and the acting is great. I was suprised when I found out Alfonso Cuaron was the director, but quickly realized how this movie is literally his vibe. So yeah. I like it.
Voldemort didn’t NEED Harry’s blood to be brought back. He just needed it to get around the whole “power of love” spell placed over Harry by his mother. After the first movie, Voldemort realised he needed to do this if he wanted to kill him
Even though that screwed him over because as explained by dumbledore in the last book it bound harry to earth so he couldn't die because the power of the sacrifice
I thought Cedric’s death was handled really well, the music still playing as Harry teleports back with his body, the normality or everything until his body causes disruption, very realistic and how I’d imagine how a crowd would react to a dead body.
when me and my buddy are drunk we will sometimes reenact that scene, immitating the music from the marching band and everything. It was a great scene and definitely super memorable.
The one thing that I really disliked about goblet of fire is that we are told that fleur delacour is a really badass wizard but she get's defeated all the time and has to be saved in all the tests except the first one which doesn't matter because we cannot see her do anything.
@@hulmhochberg8129 Ah yes, I'm sure the female author hates women. Also everyone from Durmstrang was a stereotype too, but they are men so I guess it's not a problem.
"Just think of the scene the French girls were introduced. " This is from the movie. In the books the majority of that school were just some average kids, including the boys (yes there were boys also). I mean, I get it if y'all don't like JKR, but cut her some slack. Not everything she's done was awful. EDIT: Same goes for the Durmstrang school. Most of these guys were average joe's, not super manly athlets.
Yeah but I think the director is the one to blame on this one. In the books the schools are mixed in gender unlike the movies where they make one all boys and the other all girls.
Im so glad that someone else thinks about young tom riddle sitting in his room with his diary open, writing out "I am lord..." And then trying to figure out which anagram of the rest of his name sounds coolest. Because I think about that every damn day
The only cool thing left about Voldemort's name is that apparently Rowling didn't intend for the T to be pronounced. As soon as I read that, I translated it from French and got "flight of death." I feel like this should be more prevalent information, but she's kind of bogged down a lot of cool things with the weird convoluted and plot-holey shit.
1. Chamber Of Secrets - it creates the mysterious, thriller affect in a kids movie but retains the fairytale like charm of the medieval castle , most of the scenes are at night with yellow lights in the castle, gives a cozy feeling. 2. Philosopher's stone - Introduction to the wizarding world, adventurous 3. Goblet Of Fire - Action filled, other schools, thrilling 4. Deathly Hallows 1 - ik some parts are boring like their wilderness quests but rest is so good. 5. Deathly Hallows 2 - Action, revelations, fun to watch 6. Half Blood Prince - The correct amount of grim and jolly , not trying to make it extra sad 7. Order Of the Phoenix - nothing much to say, just ok 8. Prisoner of Azkaban - I truly despise this movie. I know many of the so called film experts and wannabes state this as their fav, for Oscar winning Curon's direction, and brilliant cinematography. Yes I give credit there, but such a setting was not required, at all. It feels so much like the half blood Prince, if Voldemort was gone, there was no present threat of him, still the movie felt so much grim, not a single shot with sunlight, unnecessary cloudy weather all the fuckin time. Even when the dementors where gone. It Destroyed what Chris Columbus had built, A fairytale like land, nostalgic, old and dreamlike, I know a transition was needed but it was too much on the face, it just wasn't required.
I've always had similar issues with the Mad-eye Moody and Barty Crouch Jr. storyline from Goblet of Fire--even as a child. You put it into words so well.
Yeh it’s so weird. Moody was a great character on his own. The fact that all his development in goblet of fire wasn’t even real because it wasn’t moody is so dumb. Because we now have this character who’s said to be such an amazing wizard but we don’t know him at all, because he’s barely on page after
They could’ve done the twist better if moody had been replaced at the end of the school year. Just randomly he starting acting more strange a little bit before the final contest.
Quirrel wasnt trying to ruin the quidditch game he was trying to throw Harry off his broom because it was seemingly a convenient way to kill him while making it look like an accident rather than a straight up murder
I think its more the movies fault for this not your point since yeah that's what was happening but I think if Wood got smacked by a hard af bludger (that massive ball) hits the pole (I think) and falls off his broom I think Harry should be good Xd
@@LimeDida he doesnt need Harry alive at this point. All he wanted was the Stone. If I remember right the only time he needed Harry alive was during GoF when he needed his blood in order to regain his power
@@TheShankPimp I believe that is correct as well, and I think the main reason he needed his blood was because his first method of resurrection, the Stone, failed.
@@TheShankPimp In GoF he didn't need Harry's blood, he only wanted to use it because it contained the magical protection given to harry from his mothers sacrifice, and voldemort thought, if he also had this protection he could harm Harry. Voldemort didn't know about this magical protection until the end of Philosophers stone, when quirrell couldn't lay his hands on Harry.
I swear, Marcus has this gift where he can explain literally any movie in existence and make it sound like the dumbest fucking thing imaginable. I love it.
I started to realize that when he described Palpatine’s convoluted plot of having Dooku send Jango Fett, who sends Zam, who sends a droid, who sends bugs.
Actually it was that the script said he was meant to say a spell but it didn’t specify, so he improvised and used the Killing Curse. Which honestly is pretty in canon with his unstable character. He’s also an incredibly talented improvisational actor!
@@vintheguy if you watch the hbo Max series they reuploaded with subtitles you can see him start to say it. Also if you really listen closely it doesn’t really sound like “Avada” but more like “Vera”
Dumbledore explained in Half Blood Prince that Voldemort told Malfoy that the diary had the power to reopen the Chamber of Secrets, but not that part of his soul was in the book. It's kind of a stupid thing of Voldemort to assume Malfoy would be more careful with the book, without telling him why it's important.
11:45 in the books, this part is actually explained. Voldemort never told Lucius that the diary is a horcrux, but he did tell him it can open the Chamber of Secrets. The reason for that is he didn't want his knowledge of the chamber get wasted (he only had the chance to open it once). Lucius sneaked it to Ginny because 1, it was the year when the chamber should be opened, 2, he didn't get any other direction from his master before his demise, so he thought that's the best thing to do. 3, he saw it as a great opportunity to compromise his longtime rival, Arthur Weasley and 4, it's an easy way to get rid of an extremely compromising object (Lucius believed Voldemort is gone forever, so he tried to erase everything in his past that could've proved his allegience to him).
ok i get it but i still love the way Marcus explain it tho! cause is so funny! 😂 and it kinda in-joke of how Americans trying to explain the flaw of British Film
I kind of get what you're saying, but this decision from Voldemort still seems really out of character. All the other Horcrux's were treated as sacred, and each was given their own personal shrine to keep them safe, with each location being a place that was sentimental to Voldemort. As such, it seems weird that his first Horcrux, and arguably the most personal object, was just with a follower that Voldemort doesn't really even seem that found of. You could argue Lucius was more favored, but it doesn't make sense that Lucius messed up that badly, but all he got as punishment was a cold shoulder. The diary also just doesn't act like any other Horcrux. The in universe explanation is that Ginny had a more "personal" relationship with this Horcrux than the others, but it still seems like a stretch that this horcrux acts independently, when the others give people bad vibes. Also, if Horcruxes can just come back on their own, why did Voldemort need such a complicated plan to come back in book 4?
True but its still kind of dumb since lucius could have just given it to bill weasly when he started school. That way he would have gotten rid of it sooner and the diary could have just passed down the weasly family to ron, ginny, percy, george or fred who could open the chamber of secrets in the year that it can open.
The marketing for movie 4 was so good. They hyped the movie itself but kept images of Voldemort completely under wraps. It made the reveal so much better than if we’d seen months of publicity shots.
Students fall off their brooms in Quidditch matches all the time, we literally see one dude faceplant on the sand and be fine. Even if the broom takes Harry 200 meters over the ground before letting him fall, Dumbledore can just Arresto Momentum his ass like he did in PoA.
@gaiusjuliuscaesar8450 in the books none of that would of happened without a penalty. Trust me once you read the books you'll realise that the movies aren't that good. (Except for POA and OOFP. I still like these two.)
I never really thought about it as a kid, but isn’t hagrid having his shattered wand in his umbrella kinda like carrying an unregistered homemade pistol around a school? Like I think it’s implied I’m the books that dumbledore sorta looks the other way and let him keep it, but based on what happened with Ron’s wand when he tried to tape it back together this seems like a whole new level of dangerous shit the professors were chill with
Well seeing as Hagrid’s was essentially remade into an umbrella handle and Ron’s was just straight up broken in half, I’d say Ron was more of the danger.
@@MR-hn9wr yeah and since dumbledore had the elder wand for decades I always assumed he fixed Hagrids wand and turned it into the umbrella handle so the ministry of magic wouldn’t notice
He needed to give botany advice to Neville in order for him to give Harry the gillyweed. However I do think that comforting him was not the most « logical » decision to make according to Barty’s character.
That’s also why it helps to read the books so you can meet the real versions of characters instead of just the movie counterpart. But bc the writer has politics Marcus doesn’t agree with every work said writer does(that isn’t even political might I add) is automatically bad.
@@hunterthompson7605 Marcus doesn't claim the books themselves are bad, he finds J.K. Rowling's views as a TERF troubling, making him uncomfortable revisiting the series. He also takes issue with her reported narcissism and inflated ego.
This is the first time I have heard someone else point out how the first movie ends with all 3, the second with Harry and Ron, the third with Harry and Hermione and the 4th with just Harry. I really liked that progression and how everyone got some spot light and action.
I hate how, in the early movies especially, the screenwriter gave Hermione all the good lines and moments. Ron got particularly robbed. In POA, I’m pretty sure the scene where Hermione steps in front to protect Harry was Ron’s moment in the book. Not to mention the fact that because of his broken leg, Ron standing up to defend Harry is so much more powerful. In that same scene, she screams at Lupin that she trusted him but her and Lupin barely interacted; it felt like it should’ve been Harry’s line. I just wish the Kloves didn’t cuck Ron so hard just because he’s in love with Emma Watson
Yeah in the books Ron was the street smart member of the trio while Hermione was the book smart one, sure Hermione is more knowledgeable about use complicated magic, but Ron was the one with the knowledge of magical society culture, Hermione didn’t know what Mudblood meant till Ron explained it to her. Each member of the trio had a role in the book, but the Movies made Hermione the exposition machine.
There was an interview somewhere, where the director of the first two says that he liked Hermione as a character more than Ron so he ended up giving her more lines and more things to do and kinda gave Ron shit lines and whatnot. That dynamic was picked up on by the following directors. So basically, movie Hermione got a bunch of buffs that made her a better stronger character and movie Ron got nerfed into a bumbling idiot, funny boy.
I hate what they did to my boy Ron. In the books he is the best of the trio, but the director wanted his favorite character (Hermione) to basically be the main chracter.
i think cedric's death scene isn't necessarily sad because people liked cedric so much, i think it's sad because his dad seemed like such a good dad who did his best for his kid only to have him be murdered and not be able to help him at all.
along with the fact that harry was trying to do such a genuinely, thoughtlessly nice thing by having them both take the cup at the same time, and it ended up getting cedric murdered. that simple tragic mistake is what always made me pretty glum about the whole thing
@@JohnSmith-te4ll absolutely. harry led cedric into a trap with him, not realizing it was a trap. and he did it by trying to share the win with a friend that he felt deserved it.
The moment when snape tries to protect the kids is really great, he's been the mini villain for so long but he's still a human and he instinctually reacts with being their teacher/guardian.
Can we jsut talk about how Harry goes off to this school that literally changes the way he understands the world...and he acts like its boring because its school. Fuck me, if I went to hogwarts I'd be hitting those books hard.
same omg i could never understand why harry complains about having to study, i'd be reading every single book in reach, practicing every single spell every single night if someone showed up one day and revealed to me magic was real and i was a witch *___*
Good point I never thought about. If, as a kid, my math class suddenly got changed out for magic potion making, I’d be all over that shit and in the library constantly.
15:40 In other languages, translators replaced the entire name to preserve the anagram. In French, Riddle's full name becomes Tom Elvis Jedusor which forms an anagram for "Je suis Voldemort" ("I am Voldemort"). His middle name is ELVIS!!
I'm SO glad this vid exists and totally agree with it 99% of the way-the one defense I have is in regards to Avada Kedavra; I think the fact that it's very plain and simple is exactly what makes it feel sinister within the story. It's antithetical to the whimsy and flashiness that we had so far associated with magic in the story, so it has this levity and sobriety to it that brings it a sort of narrative weight. I also think, as a kid, the idea that it was just a spell a person could cast that would instantly kill another person made it feel like death was something that could happen easily and at any time, like death wasn't a matter of power, but of intent. Like, you could probably fight a fire dragon if you're skilled enough, but get hit with Avada Kedavra and you're done. The reason you aren't dead is because no one around you wants you dead-and if they did, it wouldn't be difficult for them. And that's also why Harry's power to oppose Voldemort is special, though I agree that it makes the showdowns they have boring as all hell. It also makes you wonder why anyone in this world tries to kill anyone else by, say, bucking them off a broom, or training a snake to be racist.
In my opinion, the advantages you listed-while cool and interesting- don't make up for the fact that Harry Potter fights basically become scary laser tag because of the spell, at least when it comes to the villains (and excluding the Department of Mysteries.)
@@or9422 nah, I totally agree. Introducing a spell like that pretty much forces the confrontations between Harry and the death eaters to be magic laser tag, although at least the story sometimes balances it out with stuff like the department of mysteries, the room of requirement and gringotts stuff-still, that's the extraneous stuff, and not the actual conflict with the actual antagonists of the story
I actually think a cool caveat to it would be that it requires some sort of steep condition, like it'll only work if the caster has no doubts whatsoever about killing their target. that could make for interesting narrative and thematic stuff, too, like if Voldemort used that as a litmus test for his most loyal death eaters and stuff like that. and obviously that shows on its own that wizards whove used it to kill a lot of people are truly "off the deep end" and cant be saved because they have no remorse. and the remorse thing also ties to the horcruxes!! that'd give it better stakes.
@@emmajoy4388 That was originally the exact concept behind the unforgiveable curses, that you needed to really, really mean it and that you were also skilled/powerful enough to properly use them. But that concept didn't seem to last beyond the Goblet of Fire, which is the very book that introduced them.
Next up Harry Potter: and the bitch in pink Harry Potter: and the stupid romantic subplot Harry Potter: and the phylactery fetch quest Harry Potter: and the Big Bad boss battle
Next up : Harry potter and the non canon story Harry potter : but its a prequel Harry potter: but its a sequel to the very bad prequel Harry potter : But it seems we are lacking him
What's interesting about the time travel element in The Prisoner of Azkaban is that, from what we actually see, it seems to be deterministic. That is, you don't actually change the past, but rather you make it happen the way it always has. The future selves were always there in those scenes, and everything happened as it did after time travel was involved. They *do* change the past in a sense, because these events would not have occurred without time travel, but they were always going to time travel. Same with Hermione being in a bunch of places at once; if she actually created a new timeline each time she went back, people would only remember the final iteration, and nothing would feel strange. Instead, it all occurs simultaneously in the past. This suggests that trying to go back to change prior events that had a bad outcome would be futile. Something would always stop you. It's not fate or a lack of free will, exactly, it's just that it's all one timeline. What actions you take in the past had always contributed to how the events played out, for better or for worse. But if your goal was to prevent that event from happening, then by definition you are doomed to fail, because the event occurred. You may have even caused it to happen. It would be a paradox otherwise, because you wouldn't have gone back to that moment if you didn't have some reason to. This makes the time turner only useful if you don't know the outcome of the event you're trying to influence. It's still an incredibly powerful artifact that doesn't really make sense to just hand to a child so she can take more classes each day. If anything, limiting its full time travel capacity to 24 or even 12 hours would make more sense as being a sort of 'lesser' magical item that's still very useful but possibly more common, and significantly less dangerous to give to a student.
That is very well explained. I mean if bad events happened they are written this way because there is no timeline that could improve the outcome. Sadly this logic that makes a lot of sense is tossed out in the 8th book when people go back to save cedric, but let's pretend the last book doesn't exist :).
Voldemort wanted to kill Harry in PS because of vindictiveness and because thats what he does for fun. He didnt need Harry in that movie because he was planning on using the Stone. He didnt plan on using Harry until GoF.
@@rawrdino7046 Rowling retconned a lot of things in the books but this is a weird one to claim that for. Voldys plan in the philosophers stone was to use it to restore himself. Once he failed at that he decided on the bone blood flesh thing. Those things dont contradict. Even if she was making it up as she went along, it makes perfect sense.
@@ct-p6004 I hate this series, Rowling, and her retcons, but you are 100% right. In the first one he was going to kill Harry because he would have returned with the Stone.
I'm actually SHOCKED you didn't mention how Chamber of Secrets is framed in Dutch angles 90% of the time. I just watched the movie again last week and felt like my entire apartment was slanted.
Yeah Kenneth Branagh is obsessed with Dutch Angles, they're all over the first Thor movie. (I know he didn't direct this, but he plays Lockhart, so I wouldn't be surprised if he had some consulting job on the camera work)
Not really Peter pettigrew is not a good wizard he’s actually very weak and his magical prowess is just not that good, he almost fumbled Voldemorts plan in the goblet of fire. He wouldn’t have been able to produce a powerful enough confundus charm to trick the goblet (which is how Barty crouch did it) so no it wouldn’t have made sense
I know I pronounce "Rowling" wrong. I'll pronounce it right when she learns what the word transphobia means :^)
Dead body reported
Oh hell yeah Marcus.
No no, he’s got a point.
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Well that’s going to be awhile
I know Cedric's death scene wasn't that powerful
But you gotta admit that when Harry and Cedric return from the maze and the band plays the upbeat music
It's super eerie when everyone slowly figures out what's going on whilst such a happy tune is playing
Yes! And when you hear his dad go “my boyyyyy!” And running down the stands to him just makes me so sad..
Fleur being the first one to figure it out (besides Dumbledore 'cause, y'know, he knows everything) and screaming in horror was what got me.
@@bcash1994 dead ass it's almost made me cry multiple times
@@CJCroen1393 yeah me too!!!
that scene is hard for me to watch. it’s quite well done.
i didn't care about cedrick that much in the movie either, but his dad's actor crying for real teared me up a bit, that cry felt like he really lost his son, props for the actor
I tell you, i've watched his death so many times, and I literally don't care one bit, but when his Dad starts screaming? Like, OMG kill me now ...
Oh his dad crying is absolutely heartbreaking.
I watched it when I was like 7 so I was pretty attached to the character
I just love how Harry comes back with dead Cedric and everyone is cheering, the band is playing, and no one really notices for the first few moments that Harry is hunched over a dead body.
Mate, Amos Diggory absolutely STOLE that scene. Incredible performance. He knew he only had a couple scenes and had to make the most of it, but still didn't 'over-act' it, he smashed it perfectly. Really gave that scene the emotion it needed.
The censor when hermione said mudblood killed me lmao
The man himself
Two kings meeting
@@cielcanterville1834 inabber a king 😂😂😂😂😂
SAME lmfao
lol
The end of Prisoner of Azkaban is a glorious film. The ending where Harry thinks his dad is coming but he has to step up himself is simply brilliant. As someone who lost his father at a young age, its a very emotional scene.
i used to dislike azkaban because it meant their world was deterministic, but I've come to believe free will is only an illusion so i like it a lot more now.
It’s also made by the best director out of the bunch.
At the point where he thinks its his dad he doesn't know Hermione is time traveling. I think I have that timeline right in my head. I love this book so much@@teamrocketsslowpoke2773
his dad came?... hot ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
and i like the fact that we magically forget about timemachine in later movies. Mb reverce time and save Dumby or Snep? Why bother.
I absolutely love the scene where Snape comes out of the Shrieking Shack and is angry at Harry and about to scold him before seeing the danger and instantly switching into a defensive mode where his only priority is protecting the kids. It really helps to show how layered his character is.
@Dorel abramov yeah a lot of movies fans don’t understand that Snape literally terrorized and antagonized his students in the books that wasn’t show in the movies
@@atribecalledlen3567 well why would they, they didn’t read the books
1. Not in the book
2. That's not a layered character, that's an adult with a modicum of human decency.
@@justastudent1423 not in the book????? it must be bad then! thank god we have an intellectual like you who has the ability to read so that us common folk can finally understand what is good and what is bad.
Snape: "Wait till I get my hands on you, Potter--"
Also Snape: "YOU'LL HAVE TO KILL ME FIRST, WOLFBOI"
It’s actually so hilarious that Lucius was just about to straight up murder Harry right outside Dumnledore’s office 😭😭
Tbf, I’ve heard that was just the actor ad-libbing a random spell for the scene
@@KizaruB ironic the spell sounds so similar to Avardacadavra
@@andross2058 the actor just read goblet of fire and so they asked him to do any spell and avada kadavra was the only one he remembered
@Mid Quacker yeah it sounds weird
@Mid Quacker Making the killing spell sound like another way of saying abracadabra is stupid.
Funniest thing about HP is that Voldemort lost so badly to Harry in his first two years at Hogwarts, that he didn’t even bother to try anything in the third year. He just decided to take a break that year.
bro had his horcrux killed without harry even knowing what it is, on top of cheating death for a 2nd time and killing a giant snake with insta-kill eye contact. if i were him, i'd take a break too
"Yk what, this is a Me day."
@@inazumarai7690all while Harry was literally still 12 years old
Not that he could have done much if anything since he didn''t have his physical form and his ability to interact with the physical world was severely limited and requiring external help in order to do so. Quirrell was gone and so was the Philosophers Stone, His diary destroyed so by PoA he had already exhausted most of his available options until Wormtail found him the following summer
@@vikkran401 Exactly. To add to that as well, Voldemort didn't even know the diary had been destroyed until after he was reborn and found out Lucius no longer had it. Voldemort says that after the events of the Philosopher's Stone he had pretty much given up until Wormtail found him.
Avada Kedavra is basically just a gun with a 100% fatality rate.
…if you really mean it
That also hurts you when you use it.
@@elitemook4234 Goddamn the recoil on that thing.
well, not 100% wink wink
But think of how many shots you could get off in the time it takes someone to say 6 syllables. Even if the first one doesn't kill them it'll probably stop them from forming words
Marcus: Movie 3 is when the movies get good.
Also Marcus: Movie 4 is when the cracks start to show.
It lasted for a full movie at least...
Ehhh it makes sense. It really gears into the grand story that completes the franchise and what makes it so great, but the story isn’t flawless and these flaws naturally show as the story gets grander.
Both things are true. Basically only movie 3 is really good.
@@4203105 That's what happens when you hire a competent director instead of...*sigh*...David Yates.
@@4203105
7 and 8 are too
Remus Lupin's name is double on the nose. You caught the "Lupin=wolf" thing, but he's also named after Remus, brother of Romulus, the mythical founders of Rome... who were raised by wolves.
Sometimes Rowling is rly great at giving her characters thoughtful and meaningful names
and then sometimes she goes and names a character fucking Cho Chang like wtf
@@theduh1011 Goldstein the Jewizard
I am waiting for her to announce that all the characters are gay and spend their free time...........
JK Rowling names shit like this. What's the most obvious correlation to this character in english? Switch it to Latin, BOOOM. I mean sirius black LITERALLY MEANS BLACK DOG
Hell, the codename Lupin gets on Potterwatch is literally "Romulus". It's perfect.
"Do you think we'll ever just have a quiet year at Hogwarts?"
"Ron, our friend fucking died" LMAO
That made me cry in laughter 😂
Ron : I mean he wasn't MY friend, but whatever I guess.
Ron: “Please let this be a normal field trip!”
@@smallandstressed2364 With a Dumbledore, no way!
Can someone explain to me why this matei mihai guy starts writing gibberish mangle that i don't understand?
Edit: Oh never mind he is gone now.
Voldemort never told anyone about his horcruxes he just gave the book to Lucius to take care of it and keep it safe. Lucius just wanted to get rid of it because the ministry was making house raids to find illegal objects in wizard families. So Lucius didn't know what he was doing. One of many mistakes Voldemort made because he never trusted anybody.
To this day I'm upset that Hermione is the one who explained being a mudblood and not Ron. Because Ron isn't stupid in the books and his role in the trio is supposed to be the one talking about wizarding culture
They did Ron so dirty in the movies, I'm still pissed off about that.
Yeah...Hermione’s a great character, but a lot of the terminology and know-how that Ron explains got cut out
Well, if the wizarding world is really as racist as it’s made out to be, I feel like Hermione would be familiar with the word at this point...
@@wandanemer2630 same with most of the Weasleys
As Snape said she's " an insufferable know it all" can't get more accurate than that
So, JK Rowling has admitted that she very strongly considered killing off Ron in book 4. My personal theory, and this is a little tinfoil hatty, is that in her original draft, Ron was going to be selected to be the Hogwarts champion, then when Harry's name comes out of the goblet as well, that's why Ron loses his shit at Harry. It's a much stronger motivation, because after all these years, Ron finally has a chance at glory, and Harry has to swoop in and steal the spotlight yet again. Then they slowly make up over the course of the book, and at the climax, it's Harry and Ron who seize the cup together as a symbol of their renewed friendship... Then BAM. Graveyard. Ron is fucking ICED. Voldemort's back. And this catapults us into the darker, more adult section of the series.
However, JK probably didn't want to put her readers through that shit, so she took a minor character from book 3 and elevated him to main character status and sacrificed him instead, and that's why Cedric feels so underwritten and out of place, and also why Ron's sudden falling out with Harry feels a little out of left field. Honestly, even as a child, I got over Credric's death really fast. Again, this is a tiny amount of fact combined with a large dose of speculation, but I think it all fits.
Edit: for this storyline to be possible, there would have to be no minimum age requirement, or the minimum would have to be 14.
This makea sense. I remember in book three or four or five (?) Ron did show some jealousy. In book 1 didn't he see himself in the mirror as a quidditch player? Something like this would have worked a lot more.
That’s too bad if that’s the case. I think it definitely would have raised the stakes of the story a lot more and then Cedric could have, as Marcus suggested, come in and be even more chummy with Harry and help Harry through a potentially cool character arc and we wouldn’t have the cringeworthy Hermione/Ron romance. What a wasted opportunity.
It wouldn’t make sense for one reason. It doesn’t make sense in terms of all the movies. These movies were mystery movies. You’ll be taking away from that if you do that plot
@@malfaroangel3896 How?
@@Beastinvader Ron shows his jealous nature the first time he meets Harry on the train.
"People say this scene is sad but I don't really think it's that sad" - This is the experienced cutting edge critique I came here for.
He gave a justification for that opinion and I agree with him. The book and movie could have benefitted from more characterization of Cedric.
@@porsche911sbs The book Definitely had more characterisation of Cedric.
@@atharvadeshpande4749 yeah, but still not to the point where I, reading as a kid, felt genuinely sad and shocked when he suddenly died, instead of a general, "oh damn, shit just got REAL" feeling.
He definitely was more fleshed out in the books, but making him a bit more sympathetic with more dialogue would've made the emotional impact so much better.
As someone who only saw the movies, even as a kid I didn't feel... anything, when Cedric died. I don't think I felt sad in the slightest. To me Viktor, Fleur, and Cedric all felt like disposable background characters who were just there for this one movie to advance the plot and that's about it. The movie really wanted you to despair at the death of Cedric, to a degree that you'd only ever actually feel if it were Ron or Hermione that died. But since it was just this lame character we barely knew, the level of sadness they wanted you to feel was completely unjustified and unearned. Cedric was always disposable.
I think its just more of an "oh shit" feeling then a sad feeling scene.
Also the Hogwarts Band is funny af in that scene.
Voldemort didnt give him the Horocrux to give to Ginny, he gave it to Lucius for safekeeping. Lucius, assuming Voldemort was gone, passed it onto Ginny to frame her father for having dark artifacts. Lucius was never aware that it was a horocrux.
Also it IS established that the Time Turners can only go so far back, except for black market illegal ones, which are confiscated and destroyed.
its weird that he keeps referencing the books for certain parts so he's clearly read them, but then points out plot holes and calls JK an idiot but those plot holes aren't in the books...?
Ah yes, the illegal black market time turners that are so illegal and so black market that they simply *must* be destroyed and absolutely *cannot* be used to destroy the greatest threat to the wizard world and humanity at large ever. Because they're black market. And illegal.
@@AMVmushroomthe time turner is a plot she established though. In thr cursed child its shown time turners can take you back decades.
Yeah, the point was that Lucius was nervous of his house being searched, so he wanted to frame the Weasley’s so they would be searched instead. This backfired because after Mr Weasley learned about the book he put in an anonymous tip about Lucius that got his house searched
@@AMVmushroomexactly 😂
"And I hate how she acts with her eyebrows."
I can never watch an Emma Watson movie and not notice that now. Thanks, Cosmo.
If it stops one person from watching the Beauty and the Beast remake, then his job is done
@Greg Mehlin I personally thought it was one of the better Disney live action remakes, but then again, that’s not sayin much.
@@jeremiahvaleska8464 I feel like the only decent one was Aladdin. It was actually inventive the new parts that were added, and the new songs were pretty good.
I don't get why people dislike it. I find that very cute, just like I do with Emilia Clarkes "eyebrow acting".
just like Shaq does
"He called me a *BLEEP*"
"HE DID NOT"
That sent me.
It sounds like she began to say motherfucker. Killed me!
Mud blood
Bro I've seen this video a few time, and that part slays me EVERYTIME it is such a minor edit and it's so funny
N-
I can never unsee Quirrell as Jeff Bezos, that part killed me
That's my HEADcanon now.
I LITERALLY LOOKED UP IF HE WAS PLAYED BY JEFF BEZOS
Lmao Harry’s scream has a British accent.
I was thinking this exactly 😂
Isn’t he British
Prisoner of Azkaban: “Now this is when these movies get good”
Goblet of Fire: “This is when the cracks really start to form”
Fr lol
Bro prisoners of Azkaban is my favorite HP movie
Honestly, Goblet of Fire is just as good, if not better than Prisoner of Azkaban. Order of the Phoenix and the Half-Blood Prince are completely worthless, though
@@TAJMofficial goblet isn’t on the level of prisoner. Only hallows pt 2 can even contend with it.
@@mattfromwiisports4911 Are you literally just restating the opinions of Cosmonaut. Also, I don't need to know what "is" as good as Prisoner, it's my opinion so don't be annoying
I actually like that Harry and Cedric's relationship was distant and awkward, with Harry being very jealous of Cedric from time to time. Cedric is everything he's not, and you see Harry experience an inferiority complex for the first time. He's the chosen one but he feels very small standing next to Cedric Diggory, who's practically perfect in every way.
"Mary Poppins, practically perfect in every way"
@@sablepuff LMAO.
I think ur 100% on the money with the kind of relationship they have but the issue with alot of book to screen adaptations is that inner thought is hard to convey on screen. I've never read the books but I'm sure theres alot of inner dialog from Harry talking about his jealousy. Someday a film maker will figure out how to ace that translation. The movie did the best it could I'm sure.
Also Cedric and Cho clicked first so making him and Harry chummy isn't really realistic lol
I remember when I asked this as a cute little 5 dollar donation during a stream only to receive a polite “No.” He took the time to read my donation and find it through the mass of comments just to reply. And I didn’t mind one bit. I was just glad to have asked him and got an answer.
But then he did it anyway. And yeah, I know this has been a popular request in general but I’m happy none the less to have at least contributed. Years later, he’s actually reviewing these movies. Cosmonaut, I’ve subscribed for years and I just want to say thank you. I don’t know if you’re gonna even see this but thank you. One of my favorite reviewers, even if we don’t always agree. Keep up the awesome content.
Noice
What a nice comment. Cheers, mate.
Shit like this makes me happy
Omg the wholesomeness. You’re killing me :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
Congrats
Voldemort's real name being an anagram would be cool, but it's just the fact that it includes the "I am" that cracks me up.
That moment when Snape protects the Kids a short scene after Harry assaults him and tosses him into a bed is such a character defining moment.
Thats only a movie Snape move instead of a book Snape move. Personally I like movie Snape better because just because a characters more complex doesn't mean I have to like him, so I'll take my honorable Snapes any day, even if I mainly focus on the books
@@channeleditor9335 I imagine that most people who like Snape do so *only* due to his more heroic interpretation in the movies in addition to Alan Rickman's performance that was so good that Snape-lovers transpose him over the far pettier asshole that Snape actually is in the books. It's so pervasive that it even applies to Rowling herself given she admitted while the movies were going on that she had increasing trouble separating Rickman's performance from Snape in the books.
So much better than the book Alan Rickman did Snape justice more than J.K. Rowling ever did
@@athenajaxon2397 Snape doesn't deserve much justice imo. He was a 'racist' nazi who only stopped being a nazi when his crush was threatened (so not even because he realised being 'racist' was wrong lmao), then spent years abusing children as a teacher. Snape is a complex character, which is good, but he's an asshole who got what he deserved.
Also I don't really like that scene because him protecting them doesn't square with his constant abuse.
@@caoisekamay1175 yes the true snape doesn't deserve justice, the movies didn't give him justice but created a new snape, which isn't the best when making adaptations. However the past has already happened and movie Snape is more likable, which wasn't supposed to happen and misses the point, but we can enjoy simpler things like Rickman snape, and acknowledge that this isn't the real snape
To be fair, Daniel Radcliffe himself has said he's not fond of his earlier performances in the series because he was just breaking into the film industry and his acting is pretty rough.
He was a little kid so it's easy to see why
I agree. His reaction when Hagrid told him he was a wizard did not seem natural but his acting really started to improve from goblet of fire.
He still ain’t bad. Just not great
@@Othillde pretty sure it was the sixth he said he disliked
@@sonnyfox8407 that was for other reasons related to how he was dealing with fame at the time, rather than due to his acting ability
“Damn this movie is good but it’d be way better with racism.” -Cosmonaut 2020
"Why would you say something so controversial, yet so brave"
@@AryanSingh-yy9mw “never before have I been so offended by something I 100% agree with.”
-D.W. Griffith, 1915
I wish someone was being oppressed right now, so that I could chime in and say how not-cool that is.
@@g.e.o.r.g.e... Donald Trump is being oppressed
When people started recommending Harry Potter to me, I always heard about Harry being in a relationship with Cho, or Herimone, or even MALFOY. Not once did anyone mention Ginny, and I was genuinely confused when I found out she was to be Harry’s love interest
The drarry ship shouldnt even exist
@@benluka1811heh it’s ok.I’d prefer it over some of the cannon ships in HP.
It’s because of the movies. Harry is very interested in Cho until after the Tri-Wiazard Tournament.
He never had any crush for Hermione, the movies just made it look like they had potential for something other than friendship
@@Mialikesthings Honestly, half the students make for a better pairing with Harry than Ginny. I'm somewhat partial to Luna x Harry but even Neville would be an improvement to what we got.
The racist snake part killed me. Didn't realize how complicated Lucius's plan was and what fucked up stuff Ginny did.
Perhaps you didn't read the books?
@@pjbpiano I didn't lol.
oh how i despise ginny
@@rorysaurusrex_ I mean she was being mind-controlled
@@ChangedMyNameFinally69 I understand why you'll agree with this video if you didn't read the books which clearly explained everything.
The fact that you said “the Barty Crouch subplot” hurts. The goblet of fire book is not even primarily about the tournament, it’s about the ministry with crouch, bagman, and fudge. The movie took all of that and reduced it to three scenes that add almost nothing to the movie. This is why goblet of fire is my least favorite movie
Agreed. That and a bunch of the other subplots in the book really add to the story. They cut out the Crouch Family history, Sirius' connection, and Winky.
YES. I remember getting really into all the Crouch mistery in the book, they were a very nice addiction to the tournament stuff and the other subplots. The movie butchered it
Another terrible thing that GOF does is that it makes the “Moody is actually crouch” plottwist so obvious. Not only do you see him twice before being told later that he died, but Moody is introduced by walking into the great Hall and having his eye focus on Harry, which he later says is for spotting his enemies. It’s the most obvious twist every and what makes it word is that it was done very well in the book
The movie did a disservice to the book. They shouldn't have switched directors. Alfonso did a great job on 3, and he could have continued it with 4.
Well they left in just so much to ruin Moody
I think that even though Cedric is a mediocre 2D character, his death scene is just fucking tragic. First Cedric is murdered pretty brutally, and when Harry and Cedric get back (with Harry lying on top of Cedric), Cedric is dead and Harry is in a fuck ton of pain, physically and emotionally. We transition from one of the darkest scenes in the series (the graveyard scene) to everyone (including Cedric's dad) clapping and cheering, and the band playing an upbeat triumphant song. The juxtaposition is perfect. And when Hagrid becomes the first to notice something is wrong, we know shit is about to go down. The band quickly stops as they realize someone is hurt, and the adults (Fudge and Dumbledore) quickly realize he is dead. Fudge wants to keep it quiet as a deadly, suspenseful silence permeates the audience as they all try to see what happens. And then Cedric's dad, with no regard to anything, pushes through people to get to his dead son. His screams and cries of anguish are perfect acting. And when he shouts about his son, the audience realizes Cedric is dead; we pan over their reactions as they realize Cedric has been killed. The audience's sorrow then contradicts with the aesthetics of the scene: most of them are wearing colorful clothes and they have Gryffindor and Hufflepuff flags and tattoos for the celebration of the final tournament. Again, amazing visual juxtaposition. And Harry, in one last desperate attempt to save Cedric, tries to cling to his body and not let go.
So, even though I didn't care much about Cedric, this scene made me feel terrible for him and for everyone who knew him.
That scene wrecks me emotionally every time and I always tear up. It is a perfect scene to me and is just so sad.
I think the whole point of Cedric’s death was how sudden and shocking it was. He was just a regular kid. There was no buildup to his death at all. It was shocking to see a kid die just like that. It was a great introduction for Voldemort.
@@bobgenghiskhan1397 I think it also serves to demonstrate to the other Hogwarts kids that the plot has effects on people other than the main characters.
I read the first part of this comment thinking Cedric was the fucking owl lmao
I'm kinda conflicted on it. On one hand, I totally agree with what you said. On the other hand, I agree that some of that power is lost by movie Cedric not really being significant enough to REALLY rack up that emotion.
That all being said, I managed to develop an attachment to Cedric in the books (he was under-utilized there as well, but they gave enough to me to feel invested in him anyway), and that was enough to make me latch onto movie Cedric regardless, so... I cried at his death scene.
I hope that all makes sense! My wording isn't always the best haha ^__^;;
Fred and George had that map for a while and never thought it was weird some guy was sleeping in Ron's bed every night
Maybe because it shows everyone it would show a lot of names in the dorms so maybe they might have missed it?
they were so supportive of their gay brother ❤️
Only a marauder can see a marauder on a map
tbf they didnt really seem to give a flying fuck about Ron. what they had like 2 years to see him on the map ever? Probably didnt give af what their 11 year old brother was doing in his bed at night
@@RandomLegionaryin fairness, that's never explained in the film. In fact, it's actually left out since Harry sees Petigrew on the map.
I actually really agree with the Cedric part. Cedric should've been Harry's new 'best friend' while he was estranged from Ron. That would've hit harder at the end since it would've shown that this type of thing could easily happen to Ron & Hermione, also showing to Harry that he can't always protect his friends. Goddamn, that would've been cool.
Looking at their relationship, this seems really close to being set up, but then it just never really comes together. They're set up as rivals even before Goblet of Fire, since they're on opposing houses and quidditch teams. In the tournament, they're not just competing against each other. Cedric believes Harry cheated to enter the competition, which causes even more conflict.
All the factors that made them rivals; however, could have contributed to them being really good friends. They have similar interests and values. They start to burry the hatchet and help each other, but they it never grows beyond each person performing a favor for the other.
I agree that it would have been cool but it would not have worked in a realistic sense. Cedric is this cool, popular jock like kid who is 2 or 3 years older than Harry. Harry is hated by all of Hufflepuff house (aka Cedric's house) and is a joke to everyone else because he's a scrawny little 14 year old who's the fourth contestant in a TRIwizard Tournament. Those two wouldn't be friends.
Of course you can make the argument that that hanging out with the guy his entire house hates is what would make Cedric the nice and likable guy whose death would impact us, the audience. But then, the age difference is still an issue. A 16-17 year old just randomly hanging out with a 14 year old in school is kind of weird.
@@hittingyouoverthehead I don't think any of that's an issue since if they made this a goal of the story, it would be altered in whatever way to suit it. Like it is currently to suit the plot they went with, you know?
@@terryqokov6999 I assume you've finished your schooling? Can you imagine any situation where a 17 year old kid has just casually hung out with a 14 year old at school? Unless they're siblings or someone like a teacher asks one to tutor the other, have you seen them willingly just hanging out together? Does that seem realistic?
If you're trying to say that Cedric can be made into a 14 year old to make this come through, then again,
1. He'd be in the same year as Harry so he wouldn't be so popular. Harry kind of steals the spotlight every time.
2. All students in the school (including the 7th years) fawning over him wouldn't make sense
@@hittingyouoverthehead No that's exactly why they'd have to change it to fit the new situation. You seem to be thinking they'll keep the current structure of the story but you can legit change it to work in whichever way you want.
I legit thought moaning mettle was played by Daniel Radcliff when I was a kid... and kinda even now
Same
Yeah, I’m never really gonna be convinced that she isn’t.
Myrtle*
The actor who played her was like 40 or something in the movie
me too. or at least his sister or something
The only thing I don't like about Prisoner of Azkaban is that they never explain the origin of the Maurader's Map or the nicknames and how they relate to Harry's parents and his patrons, I think that moment in the book was such a cool twist/reveal that really wrapped up the story threads like super nicely.
Although I agree, I can see why they didn't. It would ruin the whole pacing of the climax.
I’m a massive marauders fan and the amount of research I’ve had to do at the beginning of my obsession was extensive and really unnecessary because it should have just been explained
I hated how Snape basically gives Harry permission to kill Sirius Black, that's so unlike his character
Yeah, but as soon as you see wormtail turn into a rat, I think you get it.
Yeah, the movies leave out so much cool and interesting. I get it, it's a movie so they have to pluck out the most important, but like how they handled wormtales death in the movies made me angry. Died in a "comedic" way. While how his fate in the book is so cool. He decides to help harry, but then his silver hand that Voldemort gave him sences betrayal, and then chokes him to death
Oh my God. "He's shooting him with the power of evil-- why isn't that illegal?" (32:02)
I fuckin' love that quote
To add to the "things Rowling added later that fucks with earlier stuff" pile: If Hogwarts did not originally have plumbing, then why is there a button on the sink to open the chamber of secrets? And what was covering the way in initially?
it was covered with magic
And who was the one that built the sinks? Because they had to have seen the hole and they had to go “Oh yes, a secret hole, I’ll make this sink a cover up that is accessible to anyone who figures it out!”
Apparently the Gaunts infiltrated the construction crew.
The guy that retro fitted the castle for plumbing must have found the chamber and been in slytherin.
Obviously wizards invented plumbing.
Or the Romans.
"Fast and Furious is an anime"
"Fighting Games are anime"
"Goblet of Fire is an anime"
Godammit Marcus
I mean yeah?
I hope this means he'll do another anime vid soon XD
Everything's anime !
anime is an anime
He’s right though
I was trying to be productive today, Marcus...
Do was I
Oh hey Antoine I love you're ATLA/LOK videos
I love crossovers
Same fam. I literally just got off for the semester.
you surely can take a 30 minutes break 😂✊
Aragog is such a good effect in Chamber of Secrets, he still scares the shit out of me to this day
I'm glad someone else sees the Harry Potter movies as "Christmas" movies.
Yeah, they've always felt christmassy to me
For me they're christmas movies because ABC Family always did a Harry Potter marathon as part of their "25 days of christmas". Now ABC Family is Freeform so I don't even know if they do that anymore.
If Die Hard counts, so does Harry Potter
They’re fall and winter movies for sure the color pallets are perfect
I think the 5th movie is the only one that doesn't feel like a Christmasy-movie!
My therapist: "White Marcus isn't real and can't hurt you."
White Marcus: *"W H E E E E E E-"*
ORORORORO!!! I spend half of my day sleeping! ORORORO!!! Then I sometimes get up and tell you that I am a famous content creatorORORORORO!!! Please don't sleep while driving, dear mania
he's doing whiteface
for a second I thought that was just some unfortunately harsh lighting. holy moly
@@AxxLAfriku HOW MANY TIMES DO WE HAVE TO TEACH YOU THIS LESSON, OLD MAN
What are u talking about?
I remember when I was a kid when Tom Riddle writes “I am Lord Voldemort”, I thought he was some punk kid trying to use the name to seem super cool, like he was a new villain but was trying to compare himself to Voldemort, but it didn’t work out with the fans cause he was so lame and that’s why JK went back to Voldemort being the main villain while Tom was some side story villain. Kind of like a Saturday morning cartoon or something
I was a dumb child.
That would have actually been pretty neat, admittedly.
That actually sounds kinda fire ngl
To be fair that's exactly what Tom Riddle was doing by giving himself the Voldemort name. Trying to make himself seem cool and scary and get away from the name he shared with the dad he hated and because he considered Tom such a common and ordinary name and in his arrogance thought he was better than that.
Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban is a really good movie. Not just a good Harry Potter movie, but a good movie. It's well directed, it's shot good, it has amazing visuals and the acting is great. I was suprised when I found out Alfonso Cuaron was the director, but quickly realized how this movie is literally his vibe. So yeah. I like it.
Voldemort didn’t NEED Harry’s blood to be brought back. He just needed it to get around the whole “power of love” spell placed over Harry by his mother. After the first movie, Voldemort realised he needed to do this if he wanted to kill him
Voldemort also though he could come back with the stone which was his goal in the first movie, kill harry and get the stone
Even though that screwed him over because as explained by dumbledore in the last book it bound harry to earth so he couldn't die because the power of the sacrifice
However, he DID need the blood of an enemy, Harry's was just the most optimal
I thought Cedric’s death was handled really well, the music still playing as Harry teleports back with his body, the normality or everything until his body causes disruption, very realistic and how I’d imagine how a crowd would react to a dead body.
This scene honestly shook me to my core
The father's acting during that scene still breaks my heart.
agree. still think they cold've spent more screen time on him to make his character more releatable and deep, tho. just like the video suggested.
when me and my buddy are drunk we will sometimes reenact that scene, immitating the music from the marching band and everything. It was a great scene and definitely super memorable.
@@jfklsw1298 Damn I feel bad for you.
The one thing that I really disliked about goblet of fire is that we are told that
fleur delacour is a really badass wizard but she get's defeated all the time and has to be saved in all the tests except the first one which doesn't matter because we cannot see her do anything.
Yea, it was really kinda sexist
Just think of the scene the French girls were introduced.
@@hulmhochberg8129 Ah yes, I'm sure the female author hates women.
Also everyone from Durmstrang was a stereotype too, but they are men so I guess it's not a problem.
yepp totally agree. I was so excited to see this elegant and badass young wizard but then she's just a hopeless girl
"Just think of the scene the French girls were introduced.
"
This is from the movie. In the books the majority of that school were just some average kids, including the boys (yes there were boys also). I mean, I get it if y'all don't like JKR, but cut her some slack. Not everything she's done was awful.
EDIT: Same goes for the Durmstrang school. Most of these guys were average joe's, not super manly athlets.
Yeah but I think the director is the one to blame on this one. In the books the schools are mixed in gender unlike the movies where they make one all boys and the other all girls.
The British made Lord Of The Rings and Harry Potter. You don’t flex harder than that
Im so glad that someone else thinks about young tom riddle sitting in his room with his diary open, writing out "I am lord..." And then trying to figure out which anagram of the rest of his name sounds coolest. Because I think about that every damn day
I think it fits his personality, before he became the dark lord, he was the edge lord
@@quicklittlesnail1616 he really is that dude who never grew out of his edgy phase , like holy shit ! His emblem is a snake and a skull ,
That's exactly why he had to kill the rest of his class, basically eliminating any chance of anyone remembering what a tool he was
The only cool thing left about Voldemort's name is that apparently Rowling didn't intend for the T to be pronounced. As soon as I read that, I translated it from French and got "flight of death." I feel like this should be more prevalent information, but she's kind of bogged down a lot of cool things with the weird convoluted and plot-holey shit.
"I am lord Moldovert!" just doesn't have the same ring to it.
alfonso curon should have directed the whole series, his cinematography is so good
it wouldve fixed everything i dislike about David Yates movies, who isn't a good filmmaker. just a mediocre one.
Azkaban has cool visuals but as an adaptation of the book its a bit shit not as much as gobet of Fire but still
@@JohnSmith-jh6ey in terms of adaptation, they're all equal in what they miss vs keep in
@@katie7390 most of the adaptations are good except GoF and Half-blood Prince
1. Chamber Of Secrets - it creates the mysterious, thriller affect in a kids movie but retains the fairytale like charm of the medieval castle , most of the scenes are at night with yellow lights in the castle, gives a cozy feeling.
2. Philosopher's stone - Introduction to the wizarding world, adventurous
3. Goblet Of Fire - Action filled, other schools, thrilling
4. Deathly Hallows 1 - ik some parts are boring like their wilderness quests but rest is so good.
5. Deathly Hallows 2 - Action, revelations, fun to watch
6. Half Blood Prince - The correct amount of grim and jolly , not trying to make it extra sad
7. Order Of the Phoenix - nothing much to say, just ok
8. Prisoner of Azkaban - I truly despise this movie. I know many of the so called film experts and wannabes state this as their fav, for Oscar winning Curon's direction, and brilliant cinematography. Yes I give credit there, but such a setting was not required, at all. It feels so much like the half blood Prince, if Voldemort was gone, there was no present threat of him, still the movie felt so much grim, not a single shot with sunlight, unnecessary cloudy weather all the fuckin time. Even when the dementors where gone. It Destroyed what Chris Columbus had built, A fairytale like land, nostalgic, old and dreamlike, I know a transition was needed but it was too much on the face, it just wasn't required.
Underrated line
“Hermione gets to be smart, Harry does his broom thing, and Ron… dies.
I've always had similar issues with the Mad-eye Moody and Barty Crouch Jr. storyline from Goblet of Fire--even as a child. You put it into words so well.
Yeh it’s so weird. Moody was a great character on his own. The fact that all his development in goblet of fire wasn’t even real because it wasn’t moody is so dumb. Because we now have this character who’s said to be such an amazing wizard but we don’t know him at all, because he’s barely on page after
@@davidfairweather3301 yeah moody was awesome how he showed up for Harry's 17th birthday and immediately died
They could’ve done the twist better if moody had been replaced at the end of the school year. Just randomly he starting acting more strange a little bit before the final contest.
"Harry has to face off against a sexy french lady, a hard-boiled russian supersoldier, and FUCKING Batman!!"
I died right there 😂😂😂
ikr
28:46
guess what, he's a batman now
Quirrel wasnt trying to ruin the quidditch game he was trying to throw Harry off his broom because it was seemingly a convenient way to kill him while making it look like an accident rather than a straight up murder
@@user-vz5lw2pu8t u know what.....ive never thought of it from that pov lmfao
I think its more the movies fault for this not your point since yeah that's what was happening but I think if Wood got smacked by a hard af bludger (that massive ball) hits the pole (I think) and falls off his broom I think Harry should be good Xd
@@LimeDida he doesnt need Harry alive at this point. All he wanted was the Stone. If I remember right the only time he needed Harry alive was during GoF when he needed his blood in order to regain his power
@@TheShankPimp I believe that is correct as well, and I think the main reason he needed his blood was because his first method of resurrection, the Stone, failed.
@@TheShankPimp In GoF he didn't need Harry's blood, he only wanted to use it because it contained the magical protection given to harry from his mothers sacrifice, and voldemort thought, if he also had this protection he could harm Harry. Voldemort didn't know about this magical protection until the end of Philosophers stone, when quirrell couldn't lay his hands on Harry.
“this is like a shonen tournament arc”
I love marcus, so much
he is a weeb, just like us
You're like me, I thought I was the only one
Yeah I relate to him a lot too
Same I don't really care about the reviews but his soo so funny I can't
@@DarkKnight_ very much so. Him and LFTS are my go-to content
3:32 "in his New York apartment" I died 😂
I swear, Marcus has this gift where he can explain literally any movie in existence and make it sound like the dumbest fucking thing imaginable.
I love it.
Exactly! The way he dumbed down Chamber of Secrets to “Ginny uses the Death Note” has me in stitches.
I started to realize that when he described Palpatine’s convoluted plot of having Dooku send Jango Fett, who sends Zam, who sends a droid, who sends bugs.
And the pitch meeting guy
@@elipetrou9308 Ryan George
@@elipetrou9308 Both Marcus and Ryan George are my favorite TH-camrs, absolutely legends at reviewing a movie
Fun fact Lucius Malloy trying to kill Harry was just him forgetting his line and saying the first thing that comes to mind
Actually it was that the script said he was meant to say a spell but it didn’t specify, so he improvised and used the Killing Curse. Which honestly is pretty in canon with his unstable character. He’s also an incredibly talented improvisational actor!
@@Hobbitbot3000 he actually was beginning to say vera verto but he made it sound like avada
Source
@@vintheguy if you watch the hbo Max series they reuploaded with subtitles you can see him start to say it. Also if you really listen closely it doesn’t really sound like “Avada” but more like “Vera”
@@paulfriebe1824
Not him saying it! I'm talking about a source for the fun fact
This is one of the funniest Harry Potter commentaries I've ever seen. Jeff bezos destroyed me
I will never be able to unsee it.
Dumbledore explained in Half Blood Prince that Voldemort told Malfoy that the diary had the power to reopen the Chamber of Secrets, but not that part of his soul was in the book. It's kind of a stupid thing of Voldemort to assume Malfoy would be more careful with the book, without telling him why it's important.
MERRY CHRISTMAS! WWWEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!
Didn't expect you here 😂
Hey drew
bruh moment
Yooo what😂😂
dude, I see you everywhere now.
Drewski, the new Justin Y?
11:45 in the books, this part is actually explained. Voldemort never told Lucius that the diary is a horcrux, but he did tell him it can open the Chamber of Secrets. The reason for that is he didn't want his knowledge of the chamber get wasted (he only had the chance to open it once). Lucius sneaked it to Ginny because 1, it was the year when the chamber should be opened, 2, he didn't get any other direction from his master before his demise, so he thought that's the best thing to do. 3, he saw it as a great opportunity to compromise his longtime rival, Arthur Weasley and 4, it's an easy way to get rid of an extremely compromising object (Lucius believed Voldemort is gone forever, so he tried to erase everything in his past that could've proved his allegience to him).
ok i get it but i still love the way Marcus explain it tho! cause is so funny! 😂
and it kinda in-joke of how Americans trying to explain the flaw of British Film
Thank you I was very confused
I kind of get what you're saying, but this decision from Voldemort still seems really out of character. All the other Horcrux's were treated as sacred, and each was given their own personal shrine to keep them safe, with each location being a place that was sentimental to Voldemort. As such, it seems weird that his first Horcrux, and arguably the most personal object, was just with a follower that Voldemort doesn't really even seem that found of. You could argue Lucius was more favored, but it doesn't make sense that Lucius messed up that badly, but all he got as punishment was a cold shoulder.
The diary also just doesn't act like any other Horcrux. The in universe explanation is that Ginny had a more "personal" relationship with this Horcrux than the others, but it still seems like a stretch that this horcrux acts independently, when the others give people bad vibes. Also, if Horcruxes can just come back on their own, why did Voldemort need such a complicated plan to come back in book 4?
@@davidmhh9977 Bellatrix didn't know either it was a horcrux, she just knew it was very vulnerable to Voldemort
True but its still kind of dumb since lucius could have just given it to bill weasly when he started school. That way he would have gotten rid of it sooner and the diary could have just passed down the weasly family to ron, ginny, percy, george or fred who could open the chamber of secrets in the year that it can open.
The marketing for movie 4 was so good. They hyped the movie itself but kept images of Voldemort completely under wraps. It made the reveal so much better than if we’d seen months of publicity shots.
“Why did Voldemort want to sabotage the Quidditch game?” He was clearly trying to kill him, dude…
Students fall off their brooms in Quidditch matches all the time, we literally see one dude faceplant on the sand and be fine. Even if the broom takes Harry 200 meters over the ground before letting him fall, Dumbledore can just Arresto Momentum his ass like he did in PoA.
@gaiusjuliuscaesar8450 in the books none of that would of happened without a penalty. Trust me once you read the books you'll realise that the movies aren't that good. (Except for POA and OOFP. I still like these two.)
“This man is gay.“ -- Cosmonaut 2020
That killed me.
Yaaaassssss queeeeen 👑 💅🏳️🌈
@AnAnonymousUser go home
@@finnthepotatoprin Snape was in love with Harry's mom, so maybe bi?
@@ntnwwnet well sure, but I don't think Marcus meant it in a literal sense. Just like, ~vibes~ in general
I never really thought about it as a kid, but isn’t hagrid having his shattered wand in his umbrella kinda like carrying an unregistered homemade pistol around a school? Like I think it’s implied I’m the books that dumbledore sorta looks the other way and let him keep it, but based on what happened with Ron’s wand when he tried to tape it back together this seems like a whole new level of dangerous shit the professors were chill with
Well seeing as Hagrid’s was essentially remade into an umbrella handle and Ron’s was just straight up broken in half, I’d say Ron was more of the danger.
the elder wand can fix wanda
I kinda saw a resemblance to kylo rens lightsaber
@@MR-hn9wr yeah and since dumbledore had the elder wand for decades I always assumed he fixed Hagrids wand and turned it into the umbrella handle so the ministry of magic wouldn’t notice
also the fact that Barty Crouch Jr. was literally involved in Neville's parents torture.... and then comforts him
I thought it was obvious that he was a sociopath. It's why he was able to gain literally everyone's trust while transformed.
@@zakshah3480 I'm only pointing out the fact that he commited a despicable act. The above is obvious, yes. Whats your point?
Probably got a sick pleasure out of it
He needed to give botany advice to Neville in order for him to give Harry the gillyweed. However I do think that comforting him was not the most « logical » decision to make according to Barty’s character.
@@sheila626 this is something psychopaths love to do, comfort their own victims without them knowing
"I think Harry's kind of dumb, and gullible, and he does whatever anyone tells him to do". Wow it sounds like he's a child or something
Well he could be a smarter kid…like I don’t think Malfoy wud be like:
Come to u?…okay
A really dumb child
That’s also why it helps to read the books so you can meet the real versions of characters instead of just the movie counterpart. But bc the writer has politics Marcus doesn’t agree with every work said writer does(that isn’t even political might I add) is automatically bad.
@@hunterthompson7605 Marcus doesn't claim the books themselves are bad, he finds J.K. Rowling's views as a TERF troubling, making him uncomfortable revisiting the series. He also takes issue with her reported narcissism and inflated ego.
"She keeps inventing new characters and new villains, just to get rid of them after one story"
A Sonic series moment
i miss the babylon rogues man.
I had Fantastic Beast 2 Vietnam flashback when he said that. No seriously, what was that gigantic cast all for...
@@justalostlocal Prepare for 3 Ginderwalds.
If you liked this, go check out my Harry Potter video BRAH
"Harry Potter 3 is fucking awesome."
You're goddamn right.
It's the furryest of the saga so it makes sense
@@gaiusjuliuscaesar8450 yes officer, this comment right here.
@@ozzyman0446 Tell me I'm wrong
If you liked this, go check out my Harry Potter video BRAH
This is the first time I have heard someone else point out how the first movie ends with all 3, the second with Harry and Ron, the third with Harry and Hermione and the 4th with just Harry. I really liked that progression and how everyone got some spot light and action.
Love this video, I keep finding myself coming back to watch it as well as part two. Thanks for making these videos.
So did JK Rowling tweet out that Marcus had been white all along?
White Marcus isn’t real, white Marcus can’t hurt you.
White Marcus:
I hate how, in the early movies especially, the screenwriter gave Hermione all the good lines and moments. Ron got particularly robbed. In POA, I’m pretty sure the scene where Hermione steps in front to protect Harry was Ron’s moment in the book. Not to mention the fact that because of his broken leg, Ron standing up to defend Harry is so much more powerful. In that same scene, she screams at Lupin that she trusted him but her and Lupin barely interacted; it felt like it should’ve been Harry’s line. I just wish the Kloves didn’t cuck Ron so hard just because he’s in love with Emma Watson
Yeah in the books Ron was the street smart member of the trio while Hermione was the book smart one, sure Hermione is more knowledgeable about use complicated magic, but Ron was the one with the knowledge of magical society culture, Hermione didn’t know what Mudblood meant till Ron explained it to her. Each member of the trio had a role in the book, but the Movies made Hermione the exposition machine.
I watch a whole video essay on this topic and it was great!
There was an interview somewhere, where the director of the first two says that he liked Hermione as a character more than Ron so he ended up giving her more lines and more things to do and kinda gave Ron shit lines and whatnot. That dynamic was picked up on by the following directors. So basically, movie Hermione got a bunch of buffs that made her a better stronger character and movie Ron got nerfed into a bumbling idiot, funny boy.
@@seanbourdier8756 That's so stupid.
I hate what they did to my boy Ron. In the books he is the best of the trio, but the director wanted his favorite character (Hermione) to basically be the main chracter.
"Idk why I'm ranking them they're all the same"
7/10, 5/10, 9/10
Honestly so dumb
actually all of the movies are rated 7.5 on IMDB
and in the next video 2 more movies get a 7
They're good to great movies
Oh god, now I'm imagining Harry leaning in towards the wall only to hear a snake incessantly mumbling the n-word.
i think cedric's death scene isn't necessarily sad because people liked cedric so much, i think it's sad because his dad seemed like such a good dad who did his best for his kid only to have him be murdered and not be able to help him at all.
along with the fact that harry was trying to do such a genuinely, thoughtlessly nice thing by having them both take the cup at the same time, and it ended up getting cedric murdered. that simple tragic mistake is what always made me pretty glum about the whole thing
Yeah, the dad's delivery of his line always gets me.
@@JohnSmith-te4ll absolutely. harry led cedric into a trap with him, not realizing it was a trap. and he did it by trying to share the win with a friend that he felt deserved it.
If you liked this, go check out my Harry Potter video BRAH
@@Mr_Cinematic no
The moment when snape tries to protect the kids is really great, he's been the mini villain for so long but he's still a human and he instinctually reacts with being their teacher/guardian.
Can we jsut talk about how Harry goes off to this school that literally changes the way he understands the world...and he acts like its boring because its school. Fuck me, if I went to hogwarts I'd be hitting those books hard.
Concur. Making Potions actually sounds cool. It's technically Chemistry, but Chemistry would be way more interesting if it granted you super powers
same omg i could never understand why harry complains about having to study, i'd be reading every single book in reach, practicing every single spell every single night if someone showed up one day and revealed to me magic was real and i was a witch *___*
Good point I never thought about. If, as a kid, my math class suddenly got changed out for magic potion making, I’d be all over that shit and in the library constantly.
@@milesp1794 At least with potions I get it cause its taught by an adult man who bullies him relentlessly. Makes sense why he hates that
Schools school, yeah Magic’s cool, but you still gotta have lectures, and it’s basically college for preteens.
i come back to these two videos religiously
15:40 In other languages, translators replaced the entire name to preserve the anagram. In French, Riddle's full name becomes Tom Elvis Jedusor which forms an anagram for "Je suis Voldemort" ("I am Voldemort"). His middle name is ELVIS!!
Voldy was ahead of his time.
That's awesome :)
In Spanish Voldemort is called Senior Tenebroso. Translates to Mr. Spooky.
If you like this, go check out my Harry Potter video BRAH
You look like an angel
. Walk like an angel. Talk like an angel. But I got wise. You're the devil in disguise. Oh yes you are. The devil in disguise.
"He's shooting him with the power of evil! Why isn't that illegal?"
XD that killed me
Even if it was illegal I don’t think Voldemort would just be going to jail for shooting the essence of evil, he obviously doesn’t care.
@@LucyWest370 It's a joke dude, and the point is that it's not even illegal, like if someone was caught doing this spell, they wouldn't get in trouble
@@Maxisamo1 I know it’s a joke I just like overthinking things
I think harry being rude is fine, is more realistic than a goodie two shoes.
Book Harry is actually pretty rude, especially to authority figures. The goody two-shoes hero would be Neville
I guess it makes sense considering his dad was kind of an asshole.
@@09dindaayularasati65 Harry: "Yes"
Snape: "Yes, Sir"
Harry: "You don't have to call me sir, professor"
Book Harry was a savage
"FUCKING LOOK AT ME"
yep! i think the same. I love his sassiness honestly
don’t know why but I died when yours said ‘okay kids, act confused’ and a funny closeup on hermione
Harry Potter 3: "This is where the movies start to get really good."
Harry Potter 4: "This is where the cracks really start to Show."
tbh later movies do get both parts lmao
@@shinkamui true. Prisoner of Azkaban is still the GOAT HP movie tho
@SECRET popguy facts.
lol both of these things can be true
@@atribecalledlen3567 If only Alfonso Cuaron was an executive producer of the franchise.
I'm SO glad this vid exists and totally agree with it 99% of the way-the one defense I have is in regards to Avada Kedavra; I think the fact that it's very plain and simple is exactly what makes it feel sinister within the story. It's antithetical to the whimsy and flashiness that we had so far associated with magic in the story, so it has this levity and sobriety to it that brings it a sort of narrative weight. I also think, as a kid, the idea that it was just a spell a person could cast that would instantly kill another person made it feel like death was something that could happen easily and at any time, like death wasn't a matter of power, but of intent. Like, you could probably fight a fire dragon if you're skilled enough, but get hit with Avada Kedavra and you're done. The reason you aren't dead is because no one around you wants you dead-and if they did, it wouldn't be difficult for them. And that's also why Harry's power to oppose Voldemort is special, though I agree that it makes the showdowns they have boring as all hell. It also makes you wonder why anyone in this world tries to kill anyone else by, say, bucking them off a broom, or training a snake to be racist.
In my opinion, the advantages you listed-while cool and interesting- don't make up for the fact that Harry Potter fights basically become scary laser tag because of the spell, at least when it comes to the villains (and excluding the Department of Mysteries.)
@@or9422 nah, I totally agree. Introducing a spell like that pretty much forces the confrontations between Harry and the death eaters to be magic laser tag, although at least the story sometimes balances it out with stuff like the department of mysteries, the room of requirement and gringotts stuff-still, that's the extraneous stuff, and not the actual conflict with the actual antagonists of the story
I actually think a cool caveat to it would be that it requires some sort of steep condition, like it'll only work if the caster has no doubts whatsoever about killing their target. that could make for interesting narrative and thematic stuff, too, like if Voldemort used that as a litmus test for his most loyal death eaters and stuff like that. and obviously that shows on its own that wizards whove used it to kill a lot of people are truly "off the deep end" and cant be saved because they have no remorse. and the remorse thing also ties to the horcruxes!! that'd give it better stakes.
@@emmajoy4388 That was originally the exact concept behind the unforgiveable curses, that you needed to really, really mean it and that you were also skilled/powerful enough to properly use them. But that concept didn't seem to last beyond the Goblet of Fire, which is the very book that introduced them.
Well-said
"Marcus, did you call me a useless piece of shit?" asked Dumbledore calmly.
MARCUS DID YA PUT YER NAME IN DA GOBLET OF FIYAAAAAAH
I hate in Prisoner of Azkaban they don’t ever state who the Marauders actually are. It makes Harry’s patronus being a stag so much more impactful.
Harry Potter: and the cutesy adventure
Harry Potter: and the racist snake
Harry Potter: and the furry
Harry Potter: and the Tournament arc
😂
Next up
Harry Potter: and the bitch in pink
Harry Potter: and the stupid romantic subplot
Harry Potter: and the phylactery fetch quest
Harry Potter: and the Big Bad boss battle
Next up : Harry potter and the non canon story
Harry potter : but its a prequel
Harry potter: but its a sequel to the very bad prequel
Harry potter : But it seems we are lacking him
Harry Potter: and the bitch in pink
Harry Potter: and Alan Rickman
Harry Potter: and the Fetch Quest
Harry Potter: and the Final Boss
Note that it's Harry Potter and the *Anime* Tournament arc.
“A story being more complex does not mean it’s better”
Christopher Nolan: 😐
*Laughs in Interstellar*
Dark Knight Trilogy: Masterpiece
applies to that guy too
To be completely fair, most of his films are engaging because of the complexity, so he kinda gets a pass
there's much more to his films than complexity, but I get the joke
What's interesting about the time travel element in The Prisoner of Azkaban is that, from what we actually see, it seems to be deterministic. That is, you don't actually change the past, but rather you make it happen the way it always has. The future selves were always there in those scenes, and everything happened as it did after time travel was involved. They *do* change the past in a sense, because these events would not have occurred without time travel, but they were always going to time travel. Same with Hermione being in a bunch of places at once; if she actually created a new timeline each time she went back, people would only remember the final iteration, and nothing would feel strange. Instead, it all occurs simultaneously in the past.
This suggests that trying to go back to change prior events that had a bad outcome would be futile. Something would always stop you. It's not fate or a lack of free will, exactly, it's just that it's all one timeline. What actions you take in the past had always contributed to how the events played out, for better or for worse. But if your goal was to prevent that event from happening, then by definition you are doomed to fail, because the event occurred. You may have even caused it to happen. It would be a paradox otherwise, because you wouldn't have gone back to that moment if you didn't have some reason to. This makes the time turner only useful if you don't know the outcome of the event you're trying to influence.
It's still an incredibly powerful artifact that doesn't really make sense to just hand to a child so she can take more classes each day. If anything, limiting its full time travel capacity to 24 or even 12 hours would make more sense as being a sort of 'lesser' magical item that's still very useful but possibly more common, and significantly less dangerous to give to a student.
I love the way you explained Time Turners !
That is very well explained. I mean if bad events happened they are written this way because there is no timeline that could improve the outcome. Sadly this logic that makes a lot of sense is tossed out in the 8th book when people go back to save cedric, but let's pretend the last book doesn't exist :).
This makes a lot of sense! .....And simultaneously proves how Cursed Child doesn’t make sense since they actually manage to change the future.
Bruh this is a comment section not the dropbox for a college essay
If you like this, go check out my Harry Potter video BRAH
Tom dorkily writing I am lord Voldemort is hilarious
Voldemort wanted to kill Harry in PS because of vindictiveness and because thats what he does for fun. He didnt need Harry in that movie because he was planning on using the Stone. He didnt plan on using Harry until GoF.
Lol she made this up later
Look up something call retcon
@@rawrdino7046 Rowling retconned a lot of things in the books but this is a weird one to claim that for. Voldys plan in the philosophers stone was to use it to restore himself. Once he failed at that he decided on the bone blood flesh thing. Those things dont contradict. Even if she was making it up as she went along, it makes perfect sense.
@@ct-p6004 I hate this series, Rowling, and her retcons, but you are 100% right. In the first one he was going to kill Harry because he would have returned with the Stone.
@@bogzbiny Also, book6 pretty much confirmed Lucius DIDN'T know the diary was a Horcrux, and just thought it was cursed object, anyway.
I'm actually SHOCKED you didn't mention how Chamber of Secrets is framed in Dutch angles 90% of the time.
I just watched the movie again last week and felt like my entire apartment was slanted.
Harry Potter and The Dutch Monster
Yeah Kenneth Branagh is obsessed with Dutch Angles, they're all over the first Thor movie. (I know he didn't direct this, but he plays Lockhart, so I wouldn't be surprised if he had some consulting job on the camera work)
At least it's not as bad as Battlefield Earth in that regard.
Hermione gets to be smart, Harry gets to do his broom thing, and Ron gets to DIE.
That about sums it up.
Lol hi
They are the most obvious Freudian Triplet in fiction. Harry The Ego, Hermione The Super Ego and Ron The Id
That’s Ron’s best character trait, dying.
Ron: E A T
@@overlookers Or you could go the English rhetorical route where Hermione is logos, Harry is ethos, and Ron is pathos.
this is literally my 6th time watching this series, this is literally my comfort youtube channel now
This, does put a smile on my face
Same here
He should made an Spectacular Spider-Man video after this marathon
@@keylakettlemjardim8282 very true that show was elite
@@davinmaw6972 The best spidey along with Ben 10
Indeed
‘Just make Wormtail put Harry’s name in the Goblet of fire’. That would have made so much sense...
Not really Peter pettigrew is not a good wizard he’s actually very weak and his magical prowess is just not that good, he almost fumbled Voldemorts plan in the goblet of fire. He wouldn’t have been able to produce a powerful enough confundus charm to trick the goblet (which is how Barty crouch did it) so no it wouldn’t have made sense
@@nechirvanhevar435 I think you need to watch this video from Seamus proving you wrong: th-cam.com/video/Ncf9EvRYHfQ/w-d-xo.html
“These movies are timeless.” Couldn’t have said it better myself, mate.
What, thats such a common expression?
Bri’ish
@@Devon.with.an.i *British
@@callmejammy9571 *bri’ish
@@gaslightingabbie it’s British, google it can you not spell?