bro, you were the one helping my run through some quests the other night.... thank you so much, and crazy that i've been watching your vids and didn't know that was you.
I think that's something we all wish for. They said optimization is something they'll continuously be working on, but I don't think there is going to be a magic solution that makes it all better in one go
I'm sure this will be a good game in time, but I'm questioning their choice to keep it in early access for years. Taking the game offline while they work on it would have probably helped with response, but I guess they don't have the funds for it. Early access is such a huge risk
M80 sucks in general, but I'm not going to lie and say M61 or M62 are better. I use M62 because it's a tracer and you can tell where you're aiming. You have to get a headshot or it's not worth using it
Have 20+ early access games, don't really care if it takes 3 years early access thats the nature of early access all I see is 3 years of added content, I know you know that but it triggers me when I see steam posts etc where spazzy people are crying their ....'s off expecting good content to just magically come out in a short amount of time even tho their game librarys are over flowing, if it isn't a sequel due to the nature of the creative process and the need to experiment to see what works and what doesn't games doing something different will take longer than a COD sequel. I'm sooo sick of the Grey Zone cry babies ^^ sorry about the venting ;).
Nah I agree with you. It's an ambitious project, for sure. Development ain't easy and a lot of keyboard warriors expect everything to happen instantly but that's just not how things work.
The updates are so far apart idk man this game will have a solid player base for a week maybe each update then its gonna die again. 1.0 in 2027 or 28 goodluck this game will be irrelevant by then but I guess will see.
I don't think that's fair. They dropped what, 6 updates in the first 3 or 4 months, and they've been grinding away on the night cycle. But I do agree it's hard to see how this game will be received when it's officially launched in 3 years, that's definitely a very long time in the oven.
Unless they optimize the game, which is impossible unless they rewrite the whole base of the game, this game is not going anywhere. This is not as big as Arma 3 and even Arma 3 suffered from that.
UE5 is very system intensive. It sounds like there are some good optimizations with version 4 of UE5 but they have to build the game up with that. Still, new engine/new game, I would expect it to be much more demanding. It's not as bad as when Crysis came out and made every single gaming PC at least!
@@RaptorRising It's literally worse than Crysis :D Crysis didnt require you to run Frame gen and it still ran decently on high end PCs at the time. Not to mention Crysis was basically the best looking game for years after release, while this... It's barely good looking :D The engine is not the issue, the code is. There's games done in UE5 that are running smoothly. For example The Finals :)
bro, you were the one helping my run through some quests the other night.... thank you so much, and crazy that i've been watching your vids and didn't know that was you.
It was great playing with you! And thanks for watching. Looking forward to running with you again
that chopper ride was the smoothest chopper ride i've ever seen in this game....
I got hella RAM, it better be!
I got back on this game and really enjoying it a lot
I really enjoy it. There's a lot coming that should make it even better!
Are the Ai still one shotting or no?
Yes, but they said they identified the issue and it should start feeling better in the next major update (0.2)
@@RealEyesRealizeReelLies yeah. I was getting domed all over the place lol
i hope stability and improvment performance will comes in patch 0.2 too bcs its super strange right now
I agree! Performance boosts are greatly needed.
Thx for the video. I agree w yah. I have really come to like this game and am excited to see the upcoming patches. DeezSD
100% it's special and has some good bones to build something great onto it
We need a PRC or a CREEDMOOR too!
I agree it would be great to have some other calibers but the buildings gotta stop looking like play doh past 300 meters first lol
i would love to see in the road map 0.2.1 insane optimization update...
I think that's something we all wish for. They said optimization is something they'll continuously be working on, but I don't think there is going to be a magic solution that makes it all better in one go
@@RaptorRising ya it is what it is... But feels like a "ghost" Topic that always got the same answer... "We're working on it" t.t
I want go back to GZW as soon as possible. but there is no more missions so waiting for next update
Hopefully not too much longer til that happens, I think end of November at the latest
I'm sure this will be a good game in time, but I'm questioning their choice to keep it in early access for years. Taking the game offline while they work on it would have probably helped with response, but I guess they don't have the funds for it. Early access is such a huge risk
LOL YOU GUYS ARE DONE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
m80 is so weak. i took out the m700 the other day and shot this dude like 4 times before he died at the airstrip
M80 sucks in general, but I'm not going to lie and say M61 or M62 are better. I use M62 because it's a tracer and you can tell where you're aiming. You have to get a headshot or it's not worth using it
Have 20+ early access games, don't really care if it takes 3 years early access thats the nature of early access all I see is 3 years of added content, I know you know that but it triggers me when I see steam posts etc where spazzy people are crying their ....'s off expecting good content to just magically come out in a short amount of time even tho their game librarys are over flowing, if it isn't a sequel due to the nature of the creative process and the need to experiment to see what works and what doesn't games doing something different will take longer than a COD sequel.
I'm sooo sick of the Grey Zone cry babies ^^ sorry about the venting ;).
Nah I agree with you. It's an ambitious project, for sure. Development ain't easy and a lot of keyboard warriors expect everything to happen instantly but that's just not how things work.
The updates are so far apart idk man this game will have a solid player base for a week maybe each update then its gonna die again. 1.0 in 2027 or 28 goodluck this game will be irrelevant by then but I guess will see.
I don't think that's fair. They dropped what, 6 updates in the first 3 or 4 months, and they've been grinding away on the night cycle. But I do agree it's hard to see how this game will be received when it's officially launched in 3 years, that's definitely a very long time in the oven.
Unless they optimize the game, which is impossible unless they rewrite the whole base of the game, this game is not going anywhere. This is not as big as Arma 3 and even Arma 3 suffered from that.
UE5 is very system intensive. It sounds like there are some good optimizations with version 4 of UE5 but they have to build the game up with that. Still, new engine/new game, I would expect it to be much more demanding. It's not as bad as when Crysis came out and made every single gaming PC at least!
@@RaptorRising It's literally worse than Crysis :D
Crysis didnt require you to run Frame gen and it still ran decently on high end PCs at the time. Not to mention Crysis was basically the best looking game for years after release, while this... It's barely good looking :D
The engine is not the issue, the code is. There's games done in UE5 that are running smoothly. For example The Finals :)
Im no cheat i. Strem sniper no cheat
Hey bunned me yhe gray zone warfare discord disbanned please
This game is boring
Trash game