Setting the Record STRAIGHT on Parliamentary Sovereignty
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 30 ธ.ค. 2023
- Get our FREE Peace Keepers and Court Auditor courses here at peacekeepers.org.uk/
FREE Council Tax dispute challenge download here noc.peacekeepers.org.uk/
"Peace Keepers have been created to help secure a just and equitable existence., coming together to defend the peoples peace, to restore and preserve our inalienable rights, the highest standing in truth to be sovereign."
Nothing can be done to the prejudice of the people.
(Bill of Rights 1688)
Law is the people’s birth right.
(Act of Settlement 1700)
All are equal under the law.
No one is above the law.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
No one can knowingly impose their will upon any other without freewill.
Everybody has lawful excuse to the right of self defence.
---------------------------------
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976
Allowance is made for "fair use" purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, education and research.
-----------------------------------------------------------
![[Vowel]물고기는 물에서 살아야 해🐟🤣Fish have to live in the water #funny](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/3G9MH063Cx4/mqdefault.jpg)
He who creates can uncreate. So we created Parliament we can uncreate it, Councils to.
@@MsLeewood The Head of State is Sovereign over Parliament you are correct.
As for how much power we the people have! The King said in coronation "I am here to Serve, not be served" Parliament and the King represent us, and we created them and they cannot be more powerful than thier creator.
Parliament is Sovereign over Government only, Sovereign in its own house and is accountable to the Law for the Law fulness of what they do. This confirms the settlement of the Glorious Revolution, which created the Declaration of Rights and but in a Bill, the Bill of Rights 1688.
The Bill of Rights is the Authority for Parliament, its constitutional restrictions on Parliament.
It's very important, along with the 1st and 2 Acts of Parliament.
The Bill of Rights 1688 should be in every home taught in every school. Your children should be told that it's thier most important inherentence, not the family home or money. This is from one of the authors of the Bill of Rights.
We do have a constitution and it's ours not thiers, they cannot boil a man to death as King Henry the 8th did to Edward Rose.
As far as I'm aware it's the difference between public and private law. If one is acting privately and doing no harm, the public have no jurisdiction.
Additionally, why do we not simply sue Parliament for Breach of Contract, which is very clearly evidenced?
Do you have a contract with Parliament that is signed with a wet signature by you and Parliament?
If not, there is no contract to breach.
@@sovereign_paul
On the Institutes for Governments website there is a document that says : Manifestos, "Are a parties contract with the Electorate" .
@@sovereign_paulyes my voter authority certificate?
👀👀
@@sovereign_pauland the representation of the people act?
That’s what governs councillors and MPs? That’s the contract ie when you vote I believe if you vote because that is a choice
I wouldn't hold my breath for the response from black belt ninja legal expert.
Absolutely amazing. Thank you for qualifying so much of what we are told by intuition and folk law.
If Daniel told the truth he would lose his membership of the BAR…
Blackshillbarrister clearly has a line to tow. Why he doesn't promote the Judiciary more as a counterbalance to the over-reach of Parliament is unknown at this point. Maybe he thinks the law is too complicated for us non-lawyer dummies to comprehend ? 😮😂😂❤❤
great explanation, thanks. 👍
Absolutely brilliant work gents! Thank you
Instead of there being several channels giving information on this stuff,why don't you start talking to each other and form an alliance with like minded people?
To have 100,000 united would be far more effective than an odd YT channel here and there.
I have broached this with other channels and got absolutely nowhere.
Hopefully,one day,"likes"won't be as important as changing the political landscape for the better.
Unfortunately ego rears it's ugly head. I agree with you and I also think all the groups on telegram fighting the tyranny should amalgamate as one. The irony is they understand the devide and rule doctrine but are devided🤷♂️
I tried for years to get these splinter freedom groups to join as one, they have no interest, to many differences amongst them, Ego's destroy it.
& Many are controlled by those we are against
A channel with that many subs which is revealing the legal system etc. would be deleted by TH-cam
@@Bruce4lmighty depends on who is running that channel & there connections
@@robosborne6514If they have connections, it cannot be a channel of truth and logic
Absolutely love what Marc is doing with the peacekeeper approach. I think this helps clarify some things as we are all equal under the LAW.
Public Notice
Nuremberg principle applies to all!
In layman’s term:
Merely following order(s) that trespass against the right(s) of your fellow being(s) is no defence in law.
Statement of Facts
We all have absolute un-a-lien-able rights under Universal LAW.
An Act of parliament only has ‘force of law’ with consent. Legal is not Lawful.
It is illegal (and unlawful) to use the legal fiction.
Failure to distinguish between legal and lawful is a dereliction of your duty and tantamount to fraud.
Fraud is a crime that can be prosecuted in a court of law (trial by jury) in which the (wo)man is on trial and personally liable for all damage(s).
If you don't know your rights, you have none.
WARNING:
THINK VERY CAREFULLY ABOUT YOUR ACTIONS IF YOU STILL WISH TO MERELY FOLLOW ORDERS!
GODSTITUTION v CONSTITUTION. 📈✌🏽✌🏻✌🏿💞20🌎24💞✌🏿✌🏻✌🏽📈
New word, I like it!! ❤️❤️😀
✌🏽✌🏻✌🏿@@dimebar4617✌🏿✌🏻✌🏽
Awesome thank you I know where I’ll come if I need too.
Thx Brian & Marc
Loving your empowering content.
Would like to see a bullet pointed summary at the end of the conversation just to reiterate the points you made.
Agreed x
Thanks for your hard work lads. Have these barristers of law ever called out the ongoing attack on we the people over the past nearly 4 years? They must know what wrong doing is being done!!
British barrister, Francis Hoar, take a look at his X page. He was the only barrister that I saw that got involved in the Covid shambles, when he, a pathologist , Mike Yeadon and others had their "Covid 19 Assembly" website he was even offering free legal help to whistleblowers, he was on it from the beginning. I think he was also a guest on Dr Reiner Fuellmich's Covid 19 Committee investigations. Has far as I'm aware, Francis Hoar is now working with the Together Declaration team.
@@eliakimjosephsophia4542ALL members of the BAR work against the people otherwise they would NOT be a member of the BAR. See how Fuellmich conned people for over 2 years? They know the truth and they are paid to deceive the people. You can’t lie if you don’t know the truth 👍🏻
👍
So, getting down to the nuts and bolts of the matter, who elected the Royal Prerogative? When, where has any of the people elected such a thing?
It was part of the contract when the Crown was tendered.
We're all the crown. If your name is on a birth certificate. It's a contract with your name on it and the crowns.
Someone recently counter commented to me on BBB channel that 'Bill of rights act ' was Not Embedded law..hmmmm He highlighted that comment 😮
The king can’t even enter parliament without consent of the mayor city of London
They tell you in plain sight it's all an Act. But somehow because it's on TV news outside parliament, people believe creating Acts n parliament is different to acting in Hollywood. It's all a theatre, bread and circus
The fact that all countries have ao many different "laws", and judges are able to apply their own interpretatín of that legislation tells us that the government and / or parLIARment are NOT passing "laws" for our best interests.
Look up Bangalore Principles of Judicial conduct .........
Something to think about.
Regards the issue stated around parliament can do no business with the monarch opening parliament and No legislation can be enacted without royal assent by the monarch ....
On the grounds that Ted Heath (then PM) committed treason on the country, the monarch and the people of the UK by signing the UK into the EEC on 1st Jan 1973 (without any referendum), which deposed (removed the sovereignty and rights of) the Monarch (then Queen Elizabeth 2) making her the Head of state (Head of the corporation that is UK Ltd only and no longer the monarch.
As the Elizabeth 2 was no longer Queen, then there could longer be a Royal family and Charles could not become King in 2023 or William in the future.
Therefore with no monarch, there can be no, Parliament opened, meaning no government and there can be no legislation enacted because there can be no royal assent given without a monarch.
As such all Acts and statutes etc since 1st Jan 1973 hare null and void being not legally valid, as set out within the Bill of Rights 1688
The basis of your claim is as treason was committed in 1973 I dont recall any charges being laid or proven... Legally what happened was there was further delegation of Royal prerogative to Brussels by agreement between the monarch and parliament legislatively and judicially but did not remove the constaints set vy the Bill of Rights 1688 as that was the legal authority for their actions...
Before I listen, if Parliament is sovereign then we are slaves..hmmmmm 😮
Why don't you ask BBB to a debate?
I haven't watched the video BUT those interested may care to know that the speaker of the house of commons, Betty Boothroyd, stopped parliament discussing a law that was against the Bill of Rights Act. Her ruling has been removed from Hansard but it is available elsewhere but I dare not disclose where. Since Betty Boothroyd the speakers have allowed such as the hate crime and lockdown laws . PeaceKeepers could show you what to do but all they are interested in is gathering followers to boost their income.
Can you explain what income exactly you are referring too?
@@PeaceKeepersOfficialChannel Are you really serious? You are doing exactly what the corrupt elite do. You raise a side issue. You income is the money that you receive from you tube. Now address my comment unless you did mention how laws that are against the Bill of Rights should be challenged in the video that I admit I did not watch. You could do so much good if you put your mind to it..
Luke 11: 52 Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered.
Foe Jesus to wish woe on a group of people speaks volumes
Woe unto yee lawyers is also a title of a book by prof of law Fred Rodell where is spills the beans about the legal system. Well worth reading, its available for free online
Luke's not scripture,added 400AD,read Luke 22 30 about judging God's chosen,added by Satan.Revelation 22 16 tells you that Jesus is Lucifer.
I for one am loving all you both do, I’m also enjoying Daniels 2 penny s worth, but his priorities are to the courts not the individuals he’s defending. I see all solicitors and barristers sitting on the fence.
Unless they are the fence!
His priority is supposed to be to the Court, and the priority of the Court is supposed to be the finding of the facts, the law and the provision of Justice. Not the self interest and abuse of those who wield power.
Are people still peddling this childish bollocks? And worse, are people still believingit?
Get used to it - we aren't going away.
@@Dylstardelux yes you will, you just don't know it yet. This nonsense has circled around the toilet bowl many times over the past 30 or 40 years. It mutates, evolves, previous lineages go extinct. Each time follows the same pattern. A new guru emerges, leads their faithful followers forth into the courts. They lose. They tweak things. They lose some more. They tweak things more. they lose some more. The followers turn on / abandon their guru (if they haven't managed to get themselves locked up by that point). The particular variant fades into obscurity and then after a while the next one rises. It's like a Hydra, or Dracula. F**king thing just won't die! 😂
@@anti-stupid-not--vax9629 oh please do go on, do dazzle me with your brilliance. I’ve been looking over this stuff for 20 plus years and guess what my conclusion is? It’s complete and utter bollocks 🤣🤣
PS if you’re going to launch into a huge rant about corrupted english, try not to use vulgar terms such as “ain’t’, there’s a good fellow.
PPS WRITING IN ALL CAPS DOESN’T MAKE YOU ANY LESS WRONG 😉