The "Strawman", Magna Carta, Common Law, and More!

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 25 ธ.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 1K

  • @danatowne5498
    @danatowne5498 2 ปีที่แล้ว +72

    I live in the States and had an interesting run-in with our gas company. Here, we are responsible for anything inside the house, they are responsible for outside. I got a bill saying we owed them over $300 for gas used because our meter had been broken for 2 YEARS. Now, they had been paid around $80 a month all that time for "maintenance", and our bill said they had actually read the meter all that time, so I told them I'd give them their $300 if they gave us back around $2,000 for not actually maintaining what they had been paid for (I know there are pipes and lines, etc...but hopefully you get the point). My husband is disabled so we get assistance with the bill, so I called our Senator's office and made the same arguement to them - they called the gas company too. The gas company said, "Sorry, our mistake." and ran away in a hurry. Thinking logically comes in REALLY handy sometimes.

    • @nubiankemett7472
      @nubiankemett7472 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      You shouldn't be paying them anything at all, they've already had their money‼️....next time discharge the bill..my friend is North Carolina has already done this, just file them the relevant paperwork, regardless of what State you live in....😏 Best wishes

    • @danatowne5498
      @danatowne5498 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@nubiankemett7472 , thank you for the wishes! We didn't pay them anything, my point was that if anyone owed anyone anything - it was them owing us for not delivering the service that we paid for ("reading and maintaining" a broken meter for two years). I was frankly shocked that they didn't consider this themselves but the mindset of corporate America shocks me as a rule. Thank you again, it was sweet of you to reply.

  • @Sister9Love
    @Sister9Love ปีที่แล้ว +19

    You cannot go to jail for not paying a parking fine he is trying to fear monger you and make you feel guilty for getting remedy. Ignore this. All are equal in the eyes of the law you have every right to defend your claim. Dont concern yourself with the business of others.

    • @Flowerpot24
      @Flowerpot24 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      It depends who issued the parking fine!

    • @jamesbottomley2596
      @jamesbottomley2596 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can if it's the local authority and you keep refusing to pay and you thwart efforts to allow bailiffs to collect.

  • @edmundhodder2561
    @edmundhodder2561 2 ปีที่แล้ว +53

    I might try and watch this but I can tell from the description that BBB has got the terms of reference wrong to begin with. No common law buff would want to "become a straw man". The strawman is what they use to describe their "legal fiction" which is basically the paperwork version of yourself as defined by various official documents starting with your birth certificate. Likewise no common law buff would want to "stand under maritime law". They consider the modern legal system to be based on late medieval maritime law which was optimised for corporations to do trade. As such they prefer to "stand under" common law or the "law of the land" (as opposed to the maritime "law of the sea"). They perceive the common law of the land to be the ancient and just way of doing things. I don't think they see Magna Carta as part of maritime law so I am not sure why the description indicates they are an alternative as in Maritime Law/Magna Carta.
    I would like to see a well founded critique of the "common law movement" but I doubt this is it as it misrepresents their claims from the outset.

    • @thefoxhat6163
      @thefoxhat6163 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      "your birth certificate" It isn't yours. It belongs to the Crown. It is why you can never take possession of the original document. What you need is the LIVE Birth Certificate. This will be held by the hospital you were born in.

    • @williamwoods8022
      @williamwoods8022 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The LEGAL system is part of this scam system exposed in this video here and there to protect it and these Mafias who own and control everything th-cam.com/video/98qv9ztkW_U/w-d-xo.html The Magna Carta is a LEGAL document and the King was forced to sign it at the point of many swords so was UNLAWFUL no matter what the LAW system is plus he never had any power to sign it anyway as he had already signed a Charter handing over his Kingdom and binding his heirs to that Charter in 1213 to the Vatican so the Pope annulled it. This video link exposes the "legal fiction" etc

    • @NoOne-hq9cp
      @NoOne-hq9cp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@thefoxhat6163 the berthcirtificate is created of the placenta not you
      Placenta = cake hence billions of plebs celebrate a death day

    • @thefoxhat6163
      @thefoxhat6163 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@NoOne-hq9cp OH FFS!! Go away you stupid person. FMOTL bollocks is never going to work in a UK court. Plenty laws to protect you to use. Why not just use the law as a shield against tyranny instead of making up nonsense? Every judge in the UK will laugh out of court?

    • @bobadams7654
      @bobadams7654 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Edmund, yes, what you write is exactly what they explain.

  • @andrewhoughton-py1hq
    @andrewhoughton-py1hq ปีที่แล้ว +29

    This guy works for the legal system. We are sovereign wo/man . Lawful is law, not legal. Legal only becomes law if consented to by the governed. I do not understand or consent to your authority ( strawman legal fiction) we are lawful, no harm, loss, injury

    • @simonjamesodell
      @simonjamesodell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +9

      Yeah he's literally paid to believe that whatever parliament claims to be true, no matter how bad parliament gets, no matter how much they decide to micromanage our lives into misery he will still say "this is how it is" and so will everyone who is comfortable to remain in and continue to profit from that sphere.

    • @ejenkins4711
      @ejenkins4711 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Is what they are talking about something to do with that "quiste que vie" not sure of spelling

    • @martinhsl68hw
      @martinhsl68hw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      @@simonjamesodell It's the system that sets the rules and consequences of living that you are born into. If you really want to fight against something, look no further than the influence your own ego has on you. Loosening the ego's grasp is the only path to real freedom.

    •  3 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Affidavit will help you out

    •  3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      th-cam.com/video/U7JcRPNg_8g/w-d-xo.htmlsi=MTfcGivCrMCLFsyh
      Leave the matrix
      He is one of them that' believes THE LIES

  • @angusmacmillan5365
    @angusmacmillan5365 2 ปีที่แล้ว +41

    Interestingly, those who bill the consumer do not actully supply the electricity despite them saying they are "suppliers". They are private limited companies who only buy the electricity once they have you as a customer and add on their operational costs to the "retail" price they charge having paid the actual supplier the wholesale price.

    • @AntonyClayton-eq1ul
      @AntonyClayton-eq1ul ปีที่แล้ว

      Who says privatisation wasn't a crooks charter to rip off Britain?

    • @alungriffiths8611
      @alungriffiths8611 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Don’t forget 98% tax!

    • @commonlawfella
      @commonlawfella 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Utility bills are pre paid
      The court is a rental room in civil court!
      If you do admit to being your legal fictional name!
      You are in trouble then but if you know what I know about how court Really works just get this clown to let me on a live stream with this mug
      He needs a Wig to go with his clown cloak and dagger under it

    • @commonlawfella
      @commonlawfella 10 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@alungriffiths8611don’t forget to break contract with your supplier and put in your own meters
      Lawfully
      I haven’t paid a penny for years
      National Grid sent me a letter Asking if I still wanted to be on the disabled list of first to be notified if there is a power cut!
      So How Can This Mug taking legalize , a language of legal law.
      Join a common law court and see what deeds are available to buy.
      You will find it interesting

    • @vatsmith8759
      @vatsmith8759 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      So my local drug dealer doesn't actually 'supply' drugs?

  • @thepeacefulmumma7055
    @thepeacefulmumma7055 2 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    NEVER forget this guys first commitment is to the BAR! They ALWAYS come first. I’d love to know who is actually,paying,him to drivel out this shit.

    • @NoOne-hq9cp
      @NoOne-hq9cp 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Yup

    • @antigaslighting7798
      @antigaslighting7798 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      BBB is part of the problem, known as the 'judiciary', and he quite clearly has never looked anything up in a law dictionary, such as Black's Law Dictionary. There are others.

    • @thepeacefulmumma7055
      @thepeacefulmumma7055 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@antigaslighting7798 totally agree. He’s a shill

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Moronic.

    • @parrotshootist3004
      @parrotshootist3004 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Game theory alliances via mutuality.

  • @AndyJarman
    @AndyJarman 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +6

    These men are invested in the system that has been introduced since the 1600s. It is the system they have always assumed to have been handed down time in tact in memoriam.
    This is not the case though, and these men will never question their founding assumptions.
    Before the kings advisors were given consent by the king to establish laws that anticipate there is likely to comminly arise dispute between numerous parties.
    To resolve these disputes before they arise the kings advisors propose a prepared resolution of future disputes to reduce the workload on the courts.
    However, these statutes are required to be scrutinised by the monarch who is charged with protecting his subjects and as such all statutes must receive royal ascent.
    There are a number of statutes that have not received royal ascent - for example Canada's founding legal document was never signed by QE2 despite it being oresented to her. Theoretically the Hudson Bay company still holds the title to much of Canada.
    These men have not addressed and do not understand the assertions that the land known as England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland are not the legal entity recorded by Dunn and Bradstreet as the corporation known as The United Kingdom.
    Nor do they ynderstand that the Magna Carta provided the kings Parliament with the power to make laws, but that those laws cannot transgress the inalienable freedoms of the king's subjects.
    Look up William Keyte on The New Chartist website. William has given a number of talks available on You Tube.
    I have watched testimony from people who have contested the judge's legal standing and compelled the judge to decline trying a case once they were confronted with a man who knows the underpinning of the current legal system.

  • @henrytwigger2245
    @henrytwigger2245 4 หลายเดือนก่อน +4

    You don't always know who the electricity supplier is. The electricity supply is not the same as the electricity contract. The electricity supply is connected to a building and the electricity contract is connected to a person. If you take over a building, you don't take over the electricity account, but the supply is already there. So, when the lights come on, which companie's electricity are you using ?

    • @KevinBryden1
      @KevinBryden1 หลายเดือนก่อน

      The supplier is not who you pay your energy bill to. They are just credit brokers. Apparently what they are doing is illegal. There is an idea circulating that you don't have to pay your bill because there is no contract between you and your 'provider'.

  • @martinvalentine9228
    @martinvalentine9228 2 ปีที่แล้ว +66

    The point of MAgna Carta and British "law" was to set down in writing, rules to be enforced that would prevent the peasant using their vastly superior numbers to take the wealth from the wealthy. Law is nothing to do with morality and everything to do with protecting entrenched wealth and privilege. If law had anythng at all to do with morality fines would be a % of net worth rather than an arbitrary amount to be budgeted for.

    • @MrAndrewFarrow
      @MrAndrewFarrow ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mrs T tried to introduce that, but it was hideously complicated as your income changes.

    • @oldskool1977
      @oldskool1977 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      🤯👍 *1000% correct!!!*

    • @MrAndrewFarrow
      @MrAndrewFarrow ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ….also, for every parking ticket you got, you’d have to work out what your net worth is. What’s your house worth? You’d have to have it valued. Or guess. What’s your stamp album worth? How much is that painting worth?
      It was all too much for every fine.
      Even based on income it was difficult as you don’t file for 22/23 tax return until 30/1/24. Even then it can change if HMRC challenge it. Then what; the fine goes up?

    • @martinvalentine9228
      @martinvalentine9228 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@MrAndrewFarrow Its only complicated if you have so much its worth hiding as much of it as possible from the public/Taxman.

    • @MrAndrewFarrow
      @MrAndrewFarrow ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@martinvalentine9228 …but they’re the people who are likely to park on a yellow line, for whom a £100 fine is no deterrent, but a 0.5% of income might be.

  • @regd.2263
    @regd.2263 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    The Magna Carta is for all time cannot be superseded cannot be altered in any way

    • @autumn5852
      @autumn5852 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why has it been revised several times then? 🤔 either way, the elites who wrote it to protect their wealth and their human rights will make sure that it still serves them so I don’t think we have to worry.

    • @AlphaOmegaJMAC
      @AlphaOmegaJMAC 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      Was for some time, has been superseded in almost every part and can/has been altered in several ways.
      Die mad about it.

    • @regd.2263
      @regd.2263 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      ​@@AlphaOmegaJMACthat's the problem for all time means what says it cannot be changed its not like ordinary laws this is set in stone as the old saying states.

    • @AlphaOmegaJMAC
      @AlphaOmegaJMAC 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

      @@regd.2263 it has been though so…guess not.

    • @AndyJarman
      @AndyJarman 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The modern legal system is contestable and questionable in that it is a product of the Magna Carta but it, in itself, cannot dispute the lawfulness of the Magna Carta.
      These men do not understand the 1215 document is the founding document enables and conditions the ability of the parliament to make laws.
      These men refer to their advice as "proper" because they have not considered the antecedence of what they have invested in.

  • @PaulBednall
    @PaulBednall 2 ปีที่แล้ว +23

    My brother in law lives in a flat in a tower block owned by his city council, a couple of years ago the local authority decided (post Grenfell) to resite his gas meter from outside his flat door to his kitchen. His gas supplier stopped billing him for the gas supply, their explaination was bizarrely that his meter no longer existed !! The gas continued to flow for a full year. With my assistance, many attempts were made to try and rectify the problem, it took phone call after phone call to explain the situation until finally it was sorted after 12 months. I doubt if it was a single occurence in the tower block and I'm certain that not all residents were as honest as my brother in law and they continue to use free gas to this day.

    • @bobfish7699
      @bobfish7699 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      I rented in a new build flat for 2 years that had gas that I never paid a bill for. I rang round every gas supplier to ask if they were the supplier and they all said no. Nor was it supplied by the electricity company. The owner didn't know, nor the rental company. I kept notes of phone calls and emails and never found out before moving out after 2 years.

    • @williamwoods8022
      @williamwoods8022 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They are not using free gas - NEVER listen to anyone from the corrupt scam LEGAL system that has NOTHING to do with LAW and is there to protect this scam system and Mafias being exposed in this video here - gas and electricity etc are PREPAID and then they scam you into paying again as exposed in this video and you will not get any lawyer etc or politician explain any of this in this video to you because they do not want to lose the gravy train that they are involved in in protecting this scam system if they do th-cam.com/video/98qv9ztkW_U/w-d-xo.html

    • @tamcurrie8487
      @tamcurrie8487 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@bobfish7699 hi bob. The way the bills are shooting up i bet u wish you hadnt moved now. Im sure black holes like this happen frequently, good on the folks that have the chance.

    • @bobfish7699
      @bobfish7699 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@tamcurrie8487 It wasn't through lack of trying to pay, but i was miffed when the owner decided to stop renting and sell....

    • @cbellasbusta4643
      @cbellasbusta4643 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @paul beadnell, I bey your brother in law is cursing you now with cost of gas going skyhigh. If his gas company said his meter didn't exist then you should've left things alone

  • @NomadicNight
    @NomadicNight ปีที่แล้ว +46

    It's incredible to me that these barristers don't even know about the 'Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 section IV'.

    • @PeoplePower2023
      @PeoplePower2023 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

      These barristers are part of the system - they removed alot of the important stuff from law school so that they barristers and judges are ignorant too. Too big for their boots. I used to subscribe to this channel but unfortunately half the stuff he spouts is wrong

    • @AndyJarman
      @AndyJarman 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +26

      They are invested in maritime law and do not understand the origins of the system they operate within.
      It is not in their interests to investigate or understand the system's integrity or origins.
      They will readily admit that the legal system they use has no interest in justice, merely a role in milking resources from disputes between people and talking corpses (corp-orations).

    • @donnaleeandrews6230
      @donnaleeandrews6230 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +12

      Oh they know!!!!

    • @NicGabhann
      @NicGabhann 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      @@AndyJarman what reading material would you suggest to wrap my head around this and to go about regaining one's sovereignty?

    • @Strel-il7vj
      @Strel-il7vj 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      They know that it doesn't mean what you people think it means. LOL

  • @Ian-xt1mb
    @Ian-xt1mb 2 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    It does not say anything about free electricity in the Magna Carta.
    😂

    • @KravKernow
      @KravKernow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      They only has one sheet of vellum to fit everything onto. So it was either that or jury trials.

    • @notmenotme614
      @notmenotme614 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      If I pretend I don’t identify as an Englishman. Can I buy my electricity from France at their rates?

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You can herd sheep on a Wednesday If going uphill though.

    • @deniseharper8702
      @deniseharper8702 ปีที่แล้ว

      Free electricity should be available to us as Nichola Tesla discovered this to have for free but the Elitists stole his invention as they could make money from it so hence we are now paying..our $$ go to the elitists to support their lifestyle.

    • @JK-qb6zu
      @JK-qb6zu 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

      Yes but there was a corporation set up in everyone's name and it is taxed in the bank of international settlements in Switzerland, so it seems like you are working for the man and not telling us very much except be a good slave and do everything that you are told, I do not agree,

  • @A2Z1Two3
    @A2Z1Two3 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    You get Barristers that defend criminals , so I guess there are qualified electricians who will remove meters from properties :)

    • @dawnwheeler8861
      @dawnwheeler8861 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can get the company to remove their own meter. Doesn't cost a penny.

  • @leeseyr503
    @leeseyr503 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Question should be , why the hell is law so complicated in the first place....
    Surely it all stems from
    Do unto others as you would have done to you .... ie no Harm, killing or defraud others...
    I'd personally say, it's all written whereby EVERY SINGLE MAN WOMAN OR CHILD IS BREAKING A LAW OF SOME KIND because they are literally millions of them for a simple starting point.
    Now if it takes a lawyer or solicitor or barrister to know whether what you jabs done is lawful or not .... then I'd say those LAWS are not fit for purpose as at any point you as a person could be taken for a ride and know no different..
    Not to mention the legalese and real world words means being different.
    In short- Law is just as corrupt as
    Financial system
    Medical system
    Governmental systems
    Education system
    Again another pillar of society that's been utterly corrupted over time ...
    This is where the problem lies ....
    With those WRITING THIS SHIT !

    • @johnmcfadden9336
      @johnmcfadden9336 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      You would enjoy reading the book called woe unto yee lawyers by professor of law Robert Rodell. Available for free online, well worth the time and easy enough to read
      The entire game is rigged and a big scam

    • @leeseyr503
      @leeseyr503 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@johnmcfadden9336 thanks will give that a read

    • @leeseyr503
      @leeseyr503 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also forgot to add - since when does anyone have to follow
      LAWS WRITTEN BY CORPORATIONS??
      Since when does a corporation OWN ME OR EMPLOY ME to dictate to me what I can or can't do ...
      Not to mention they are FOR PROFIT CORPORATIONS meaning they are literally no different to
      MCDONALDS
      TESCO
      SAINSBURYS
      Facebook
      Twitter
      or any other corporation
      I'm sorry to say, these MEN ARE UTTERLY INDOCTRINATED and can't see the wood thru the trees...but then why would they cause they'd be out of a bloody job !

    • @ZenaZee
      @ZenaZee 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@johnmcfadden9336 Thanks, I just looked this up online and found it, going to read this. ❤

    • @dianegriffen2756
      @dianegriffen2756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      There are only 4 laws. Everything else is legal. BIG difference. Learn legalese, it's enlightening!

  • @notmenotme614
    @notmenotme614 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    I love how TikTokers, with no qualifications, training or industry experience, think they can beat the legal system with some “loophole”. Why didn’t the legal system think of that, lol.

    • @dianegriffen2756
      @dianegriffen2756 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The "legal system" don't want you to know; you are a slave.

    • @yorkiemike
      @yorkiemike 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      and yet I've never seen a single example of someone actually winning in court with their methodology. Funny that :D

  • @Budgie-Vic
    @Budgie-Vic 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Can anyone tell me what the deal was with the Darrell Brooks case in the US. He represented himself in a case but drove the judge crazy asking about ‘jurisdiction’ ‘Is this admiralty court?’ And when on about his name not being his name (something about being in all capital letters). The judge had patience of a saint in the case … a really frustrating but really interesting US court case to watch. Thank you

    • @moali7158
      @moali7158 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I've seen it. It is the most bizarre behaviour from the defendent. The defendent basically shot himself in the foot by representing himself when he has zero knowledge of the law and the prosecution basically were handed a win.

    • @MichaelHughes-k5i
      @MichaelHughes-k5i ปีที่แล้ว +2

      forced personhood is illegal/unlawful as you cant be forced to opt into an opt in commercial contract

    • @northernstar5339
      @northernstar5339 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your surname is Owned by the Vatican. All those CAPITAL letters. Is your fiction person. When you were born you had a live birth record./ maternity record . With just a Christian name. They incorporated the Surname into your birth certificate. Making it a dead entity. That's why when they use the word Summon in Court. They summon the dead. Corporation = The dead speak . Corpse + Orate is to speak. If you look at games. PS3 GAMES. they all summon characters who are dead. Dead entity. Summon iS from what I believe is to basically call someone from the Dead. When I go back in time all my Ancestors had a Christian Name , none of them were assigned wwith Surname til the mid 1800s

  • @ForthviewDevelopments
    @ForthviewDevelopments ปีที่แล้ว +1

    A friend of mine had his gas meter removed, he still has to have annual gas meter inspections. You could probably get your leccy meter removed too but it would cut off your leccy supply, if you lived in a city or a block of flats that would be beyond stupid but out in the middle of nowhere running a solar panel array could replace domestic mains supply.

  • @StephenBoothUK
    @StephenBoothUK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    As a union rep one of the things that causes problems sometimes is a member will be adamant that they want to take a particular case against management or put forward a particular defence to a disciplinary, that I know will fail. Even worse is when another rep, who is less assiduous in their research, argues such a case. When I take a case I research it down to a fine detail; the facts, the policy and the law. Sadly not everyone does.

    • @williamwoods8022
      @williamwoods8022 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      LEGAL is NOT LAW and Unions like the Governments, Political Parties, Councils, Courts etc are Private Corporations owned and controlled and working to the agenda of these MAFIAS being exposed in this video here - why do you think that your top Union man is on the Bank of England Private Corporation helping them scam the people with the interest rates that as per that video no one should be paying just like they should not be paying any taxes either th-cam.com/video/98qv9ztkW_U/w-d-xo.html

    • @moali7158
      @moali7158 ปีที่แล้ว

      That's the way to do it and cover your back.

    • @Stephen-lx9nm
      @Stephen-lx9nm ปีที่แล้ว

      I thought that was your job .Unions are scum

  • @leejames9422
    @leejames9422 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    A timeline on the different subjects covered may be useful in these longer videos for those who wish to skip to a relevant subject.

  • @lulabellegnostic8402
    @lulabellegnostic8402 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    If you can’t pay a monthly bill, how can you pay monthly instalments on a debt? This makes no sense.

    • @vatsmith8759
      @vatsmith8759 9 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      Probably because the monthly installments will be lower than the monthly bill?

    • @abc33944
      @abc33944 9 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@vatsmith8759 when you pay a loan its a 'repayment' because you're paying it twice... learn it

  • @tonycraig7525
    @tonycraig7525 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    You will never get the truth from a legal person. It is against their learning and besides once understood makes their work zilch.

  • @nizviz
    @nizviz 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    The utilities are desperate to get smart meters installed, possibly under a higher directive. The only thing smart about them is that the utility companies can monitor your usage to enable them to change the rate at which you pay.

    • @alungriffiths8611
      @alungriffiths8611 ปีที่แล้ว

      The Utilities were stolen from the people by a corporate government. To anyone who is unaware our corporate government openly declared war against the people in March 2020. They have been aided and abetted by corporations and government agents. Qualified does not been knowing.
      The SMART meters have been proven to designed to harm people’s health as part of WEF 2030 agenda. Having worked with electromagnetic radiation for 40 years these metres are nefarious.

    • @alungriffiths8611
      @alungriffiths8611 ปีที่แล้ว

      SMART = secret militarised armaments residential technology. They are weapons which are harmful to your health.

    • @poopinlumpy
      @poopinlumpy ปีที่แล้ว

      Possibly under a higher directive?
      What?

    • @nizviz
      @nizviz ปีที่แล้ว

      @@poopinlumpy rather bizarre question. 'What' exactly don't you grasp about my post and 'what' do you need to understand from it?

    • @CosmicSeeker69
      @CosmicSeeker69 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      and that they circumvent ALL existing legislation and can be turned off at a moments notice.

  • @jonathanhorsman543
    @jonathanhorsman543 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    1215 Magna Carta was written by Yorkshiremen at Spofforth Castle. It still stands but much of it is obsolete by default. Sadly, most lawyers fail to grasp the importance of it, including the subsequent versions, that are STILL solid ground upon which to stand.

    • @jonathanhorsman543
      @jonathanhorsman543 ปีที่แล้ว

      @D-Bunker I have never met anyone who is so utterly wrong as you are. Perhaps you may take a little time to consider the words of Lord Justices Denning, Wulfe, Laws, Sumpton to name but a few. As for the rest of your dribble, the 1215 charter was never repealed and therefore, whilst certain clauses/chapters were not included in the later versions, through not being specifically repealed, were left standing. I always find it interesting that people with ludicrous names on here spout the most rubbish. Good day sir.

    • @jonathanhorsman543
      @jonathanhorsman543 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @D-Bunker Oh dear, yet another faceless lawyer with no concept of reality. I find it to be uncharitable to take on a battle of wits with someone who is unarmed, and in your case, I will maintain my charitable status towards you. I wish you well in your bunker, where clearly, you have no access to reading matter.

    • @jonathanhorsman543
      @jonathanhorsman543 ปีที่แล้ว

      @D-Bunker The words of someone who seeks only to destroy reality and even has the nerve to state the Law Lords themselves are ignorant ! Clearly an agent of the despot !

  • @mikefawkes5010
    @mikefawkes5010 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    ALL HAVE SOMETHING VERY IMPORTANT IN COMMON. Magna Carta (1215) the Bill of Rights and Scottish Claim of Right (both 1689) Scottish Claim of Right 1689 and the Treaty of Union (1706, enacted by both the English and Scottish parliaments), as well as the acts affecting union with Ireland. It is Crucial to remember the Crowns were unified in 1603, i.e the Monarchs of England and Scotland. Scottish Act of Union 1706 English Act of Union 1707 The Petition of Right 1628 The Declaration of Rights 1688 * Formal Contract The Crown and Parliament Recognition Act 1688. The Bill of Rights 1688/9 The Coronation Oath Act 1688

  • @delsans2356
    @delsans2356 ปีที่แล้ว +11

    You work for the crown you would say that like all liars

    • @northernstar5339
      @northernstar5339 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@D-Bunker-zv1bjthey get paid by the courts? Or the defendant. Courts are under the crown.

    • @northernstar5339
      @northernstar5339 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@D-Bunker-zv1bj you have a trust account.They access this. Obviously if you've done something really bad then yes. They should stand in court. People say oh people think they above the Law . Just like politicians think they are above the law with their money laundering Bullshit . Should they stand in court? Should politicians such as pedophiles stand in court too. YES, should they get a pass? Keep the same energy you have with everyone not pick and choose who goes to court.

  • @roisincavanagh9335
    @roisincavanagh9335 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Does this apply worldwide, I’m in Ireland 🇮🇪 so can I use the straw man as a defence here ? Thanks

  • @ComeJesusChrist
    @ComeJesusChrist 2 ปีที่แล้ว +31

    I have been looking forward to this video. You cannot argue that we are not slaves. I understand that as a Barrister, you are still subject to certain rules that may limit your freedom to discuss matters as freely as others may.

    • @ven11000
      @ven11000 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes totally, sworn to the BAR. If people learn this lawyers are out of pocket. The corruption and collusion runs so very deep

    • @gt20000
      @gt20000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      Yes they swear to the Bar bar bar. That's their master!

    • @fergusdangerfield156
      @fergusdangerfield156 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      @@gt20000 and that's why you can't have a fair trial. If you go to court without a barrister to represent you, there is just you on one side but against you is the judge, who represents the Crown, a prosecution barrister who's first duty is to the crown, a clerk who is legally trained and has duty to the crown and even if you employed a barrister at extortionate sums his first duty is to the crown. So that is at least four against one. I would also argue that cases brought as R Vs are without jurestrition as R= Regina, which is the queen and I don't believe that she has standing to bring a case against anyone, as she herself is a criminal due to the fact that she has breached her coronation oath!

    • @gt20000
      @gt20000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

      Coronation Oath 1688
      Bill Of Rights 1689
      The Act of settlement 1700
      Treason Act 1795
      We can use the above to assert our inalienable God given rights which no Government, Monarch, or Judge can usurp. We have not had a standing Monarch since 1970's when Heath sold us down the river and made everything corporation's. The queen is head of state so a slight change of her position.
      Have a read of the above Laws and use them to your advantage. 😉

    • @williamwoods8022
      @williamwoods8022 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@gt20000 The Royal family are a MAFIA family just like the "royal" bankers and the Vatican who created and control this scam system and all of these things you have shown are LEGAL - the entire LEGAL system is corrupt and controlled and based on Fraud, Deception, Personation etc and the people are conned into being part of this scam system. The Magna Carta was also a LEGAL document that King John was forced to sign at the point of SWORDS so was UNLAWFUL in any LAW system including Common Law and not only that he never had any power to sign it anyway because he had already signed a Charter in 1213 handing over his Kingdom for all time to the VATICAN and locking his heirs into that Charter as well. The Vatican already owned and controlled most of the Western world by then anyway as the Royals etc had to go to the Pope to get his permission for everything and all of the "laws" in the LEGAL system are Vatican "laws". This LEGAL system is there to protect this scam system and all you will get from them is LIES to protect their racketeering scam like thse two guys in this video are doing big time. No one is stealing any electricity or gas - it is the energy companies and governments etc that are scamming the people big time making them pay for energy that has already been PREPAID - DOUBLE DIPPING - and all of that money is going along with the scam taxes that no one should be paying into the off shore accounts of these Mafias being exposed in this video here th-cam.com/video/98qv9ztkW_U/w-d-xo.html

  • @leeanness4846
    @leeanness4846 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Legal rulings are empowered by civil law for the cessation of harm or to provide remedy to stop harm. When legal rulings are causing harm it's not only unlawful it is dispicable and our representatives should be doing everything in their power not to let this happen

    • @AllAboutBritain
      @AllAboutBritain ปีที่แล้ว

      It is not 'harm' to pay taxes - it is a responsibility that goes along with rights. However, I agree that Council Tax should be raised in a more progressive way and that it is far too high.

  • @notleftnotrightinmiddle
    @notleftnotrightinmiddle 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Just making a brew for this, thanks 😊

  • @beklerken1
    @beklerken1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Here in Australia our legal set up is very similar with meters, but in some years back when the utilities companies decided to install smart meters to every household, even though as the act gives you ( the consumer) the option to have a meter of your choice, the companies teamed up with the politicians forced to install the smart meters with all kinds of unlawful tactics, coercion, threats and so on to achieve their total installations of smart meters.
    That clearly shows that the utilities companies breach the law when the consumer chooses to remain with the "old" meter, but their choice is ignored and no legal action is taken by administrations against the companies to regulate in favour of the consumers, keeping in mind that the natural resources and bare essentials of life like water,gas,electricity is in reality the property of the people to provide for people under the management of elected administration for the best interest of the people with providing the essentials of life in priority rather than profit as the companies prioritise. So, you are not neutral my friend, you are ignoring the essence of the people are the highest authority that elect administrations to administer for their best interests.
    Companies and corporations inour day are ruthless in destroying lives of not so fortunate or low income families, giving no worth to life instead put profit before welfare of people all over the world is how i see it all.

    • @clairecatchpool3489
      @clairecatchpool3489 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good point re the smart meters being forced. This was true however there was massive push back. The smart meters allowed them to charge more at certain times. With the push back from consumers and electric contractors, the cheeky parasites changed the way they billed the old disc meters, being they charged different rates per blocks. Ie the first 20 kWh at 20 cents the next block at 60 cents and so on
      It’s now better to have smart meters
      Cheeky far king carrnts
      They also smash you with the SEC ( standby electricity charge) being the charge they bill you for the availability of power at any time.
      So to really stuff these twats it’s best to get off grid with ups and solar etc. however I think if enough people go off grid they will charge you regardless if you are in an area that’s has the poles and wires
      Watch this space

    • @beklerken1
      @beklerken1 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@clairecatchpool3489 The moral of it all is that the masses or the majority of the people do not resist or question politicians, along with knowledge of their constitutional and civil, human rights my good friend.
      As I was renting at the time of the smart meter push, I resisted with locking up my meter box, putting up "no trespassing"signs with related laws on it didnt stop them from annoying me with letters of threat etc that I answered with conviction stating the law and NOT regulation that they argued with, eventually got them off my back, without changing my meter until i moved out of there.
      My dream goal is to one day go off grid in the bush and become mostly self sufficient.
      Politicians have sold us out and enslaved us to corporations while lining their own pockets for quite some time and the masses are still asleep unfortunately. May your God bless you.

  • @markhorton8578
    @markhorton8578 11 หลายเดือนก่อน +3

    I find it staggering that this is even an issue. When I was young there were not that many deluded people about. Suggesting you should get electricity and gas for free, would have invited well deserved social ridicule. Being arrogant, entitled, and selfish seems to be becoming normalised.

  • @econrith
    @econrith 7 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Electricity and telephone services used to be a service fee only, but now we have a structure where our services are corporate for profit suppliers who raise prices regularly to where those in need of them are kept poor through extortion. This is entirely legal BUT not respectable. Not only this, but magistrates courts and police forces as well as councils are also incorporated for profit. No one to make the profit from but you. Expect a barrage of criminalising procedures on you to extract money in the form of cannot park here, cannot stand here, cannot walk your dog here, cannot use this park or walk through it, cannot use this once free road etc.

  • @garwilliams1
    @garwilliams1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The utility company would not let you interfere with their equipment. It’s illegal to pull the main fuse to a property without authorisation. Everything to the main fuse is theirs.

    • @deanrobertson8358
      @deanrobertson8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Wrong. Get a professional to do it and your fine there is no law that says you cant install your own meter

    • @deanrobertson8358
      @deanrobertson8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      "Everything to the main fuse" is not theres it would belong to transco or national grid. The utility companys dont even have gas or electricity.

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@deanrobertson8358 )1989 Electricity Act schedule 7 " If the customer refuses or fails to take his supply through an appropriate meter provided and installed in accordance with sub-paragraphs (2) and (3) above, the supplier may refuse to give or may discontinue the supply." an appropriate meter is one agreed to by the supplier.

    • @deanrobertson8358
      @deanrobertson8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@snowflakemelter1172 im not a customer. There is no law that says i need to be a customer

    • @yorkiemike
      @yorkiemike 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@deanrobertson8358 there literally is.

  • @stevendavis7079
    @stevendavis7079 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Also, we are supposed to be governed and policed by CONSENT, representing a WILL of the people. When does that happen ? More like lied to, coerced, manipulated, bullied and subjugated. Far closer to reality than giverned by consent

  • @Rabmac1UK
    @Rabmac1UK 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    With 2 credit card debts, each of which was circa £8,000, I managed to get one debt entirely written off, and another to agree to £1 per month, with zero interest accruing
    My Client was over the moon with that result. Mental Health Charity Worker

    • @saimir77
      @saimir77 ปีที่แล้ว

      I can get any debt written off without anyones help, simply by writting certsin things on any legal mail and then return to sender

    • @Rabmac1UK
      @Rabmac1UK ปีที่แล้ว

      @@saimir77 In your Country, perhaps

  • @jamesantonywhitehead2814
    @jamesantonywhitehead2814 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    What books give the information on Common Law in the UK

    • @AndyJarman
      @AndyJarman 8 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Case law is recorded in the court rolls. These documents are held by the courts and available from libraries. Most is now available online. The paralegal's roll is to investigate case law.
      At the end of a trial the judge will give his verdict of the arguments laid before him. The judge will also summarise his reasoning and the considerations he made in a section called the "obiter dictum". The contents of the Obiter Dictum does not have legal force in itself, but it does explain and provide insight into how and why the judge arrived at his judgement.

  • @lt4203
    @lt4203 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Of course you can get you own meter fitted by a qualified electrician. What you do there on is up to you.
    “Straw man” a legal fiction operating in commerce (contract) designed for you to joinder. Stand on the land, exercise your rights. I can’t be bothered to listen to anymore of this.
    Whole system is an absolute sham full of traps.

    • @robertcleaver2357
      @robertcleaver2357 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      As an electrician it is illegal for us to touch the meter. And there is no paper work we can give you that says it was installed correctly.

    • @lt4203
      @lt4203 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@robertcleaver2357 right,okay…
      is only illegal (acts and stats) if your not qualified. And safty only applies to gas.

    • @DrTim-go4df
      @DrTim-go4df 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      @@robertcleaver2357 Why is it illegal? That makes no sense.

    • @robertcleaver2357
      @robertcleaver2357 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​@@DrTim-go4dfBecause you don't own them, the board does and as an electrician we are not allowed to touch them. We have to get the electric board out..

    • @robertcleaver2357
      @robertcleaver2357 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      ​​@@lt4203no because it's not your property. That's why

  • @johnh9449
    @johnh9449 ปีที่แล้ว

    The meter is the property of the electricity supplier and the cut out the property of the DNO (Distribution Network Operator) which needs to be removed to isolate the meter for safe removal or replacement. A qualified electrician would need permission from the DNO to remove the cut out fuse. None of this is the property of the home owner.

  • @ruisantos2887
    @ruisantos2887 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    “Barrister” explain to us the difference between legal and lawful?
    And yet again why haven’t you accepted the challenges for a public debate? Probably afraid of being exposed.
    Also explain to your subscribers about maritime law and law of the land.

  • @curbyi76
    @curbyi76 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Wow is this where we got to Rumpole telling us that actually removing the electricity meter is illegal and not a thing to do, with live 100 amp tails floating about I say let natural selection do its work.

    • @Trevor_Austin
      @Trevor_Austin 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Darwin Award still exist.

    • @totherarf
      @totherarf 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I say Don't! (tempting as it is)
      I am being purely selfish here as I am one of the guys that has to clear the mess up afterwards!

    • @williamwoods8022
      @williamwoods8022 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No one was saying to remove the meters yourself but to use professionals to do it and there are many who are doing this for people - it is the energy companies, governments, courts etc that are involved in the FRAUD and DECEPTION etc and scamming the people into paying for energy etc that has already been PREPAID as totally exposed in this video here th-cam.com/video/98qv9ztkW_U/w-d-xo.html

  • @MIsaacs-p3n
    @MIsaacs-p3n 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    i spoke to LEAP local energy action charity. they informed me that i dont have to have a smart meter.. the govt insist they hound you, u then ask to be put on “lomg term opt out” you have to do this every 3 months tho. they also told me that smart meters cost more and they can shift the unit price but my key meter rate stays the same as wheb u topped it up. The LEAP adviser worked for energy companies and knows his stuff. just dont agree to have a smart meter fitted !! this info is true as ive just done it!! these blokes work for the crown so what do u expect from officers of the court. even if you employed this guy… he wont work for u.. he still works for the court.. NOT U

  • @britishbluecatsonwheels
    @britishbluecatsonwheels 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

    Loved Alan’s clear explanation of what/where Court of Chancery was & By-laws.
    Very informative video - thank you
    Love the floof who is growing so fast 🐾🐾🐾

  • @craigjay6820
    @craigjay6820 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    As an electrician I've been asked many, many times to abstract electricity and every occasion I've refused, then explained just how ridiculously dangerous it is, followed by the ramifications of their stupidity.
    As you've correctly noted, it's not a right, only a service and rewiring meters for a complete stranger cones with a whole host of risks and prosecutions. So nobody in their right mind would fulfil that request.
    As much as I hate the current situation of high energy costs, not once have I considered rewiring and nobody else should do either, it's not only a false economy, but chances are you'd cause an electrical fire or worse...just don't!!

  • @michaeldeath7430
    @michaeldeath7430 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Thank you both for a lovely entertaining overview of these issues.
    Really easy to understand and very relevant to today’s world where everything is rattling around on the net, with most of it wrong!

    • @deanrobertson8358
      @deanrobertson8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Do your own research and stop listening to this pleb.

    • @williamwoods8022
      @williamwoods8022 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Ha Ha Listening to LEGAL people who are part of this scam Cestui Que Vie Trust MAFIA system and are there to protect this scam system and paid well to do so and you think most of the people who are exposing it are wrong - funny how these LEGAL people and corrupt politicians are totally silent about all of this being exposed in this video here and when you present this into the court they try and run away from it or ignore it just like I did all the way up to the top court Court of Session here in Scotland and in the other cases that this has been entered into as well th-cam.com/video/98qv9ztkW_U/w-d-xo.html

    • @saimir77
      @saimir77 ปีที่แล้ว

      There is no Law that says you have to pay any taxes, parking/speeding tickets, electricity, gas, water etc. As long as you do not admit being the strawman, they can do nothing. Any legal mail you receive , you can return to sender by writing on the sealed envelope:
      Birth certificate clausula rebus sic stantibus.
      Without prejudice.
      No contract
      A memoir
      and more. Get on Amazon the book YOU ARE NOT A STRAWMAN YOU ARE THE ZYGOTE by Saimir X. Kercanaj
      I got summoned in court for 20k charges, I didnt go. I return to sender the poisoned mail they sent, by writing what is in that book, they cant do anything to me because I do not admit being someone I'm not. Either you are a living soul or a legal dead birth certificated character a.k.a STRAWMAN. The court is a private business. Only the strawman can go to court, not you. But the strawman is just a 2D character on paper so if you do not admit being the strawman, then there is no case. They can do nothing about it. Even if they issue arrest order, the order is for the strawman, and not for you. So, never admit being the strawman. And never open any legal mail. They must be returned to sender. The strawman NAME/LAST NAME is crown copyrighted. It's illegal to use a legal name. Read the book.

  • @christinestanding
    @christinestanding 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I hate advertisements. But watching your Nord VPN ad was a total delight and the blonde is a real eye-catcher.

  • @steve3291
    @steve3291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    I expect the deluge of comments from people who have read some stuff on Facebook.
    It's always interesting to hear from people who have studied and understand the law and it's history rather than people who disregard everything after a document written in 1215 because it suits their narrative.

    • @willtellall638
      @willtellall638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +11

      The Questions remain who owns the Meters?
      Who owns the electric?
      Who owns the gas?
      What contract do I have with you?
      All acts and statutes are by consent otherwise it would be slavery and this is unlawful.

    • @steve3291
      @steve3291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      @@willtellall638 Point proven.

    • @willtellall638
      @willtellall638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The electricity is already paid for by the Government through our taxes these metering firms do not own the pipes, pylons or the product. Not to mention the Gov taxes us 92% on utilities.
      Guys check out the Cestui Que Vie Act 1666 this proves we are all ships at sea considered dead until a proof of life is obtained.

    • @jaihawkins
      @jaihawkins 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      ​@@steve3291 Didn't take long that 🤣

    • @willtellall638
      @willtellall638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

      Energy Companies DO NOT own your meters. Yes you heard me right.
      Let’s get out of the habit also of calling energy companies suppliers when they aren’t any such thing. There BROKERS! Selling you debt. Which is fraud.
      ABOUT ENERGY COMPANIES
      Let me explain about energy companies and what they can and CANNOT do.
      The electric and gas supply to the house or company cannot be cut off ever. Well, not in the UK.
      The world of the movies is different. Once installed that supply of Gas or Elec or Water will be maintained because the National grid is not the energy billing company.
      It's a separate company called the National Grid who have a contract with the government and they will not breach that contract and the judge has no authority to override that contract.
      So not even a court order can have that Gas/Elec/Water feed cut off. This is why they want to get in your house and fit a prepay meter.
      Now this is Civil and in the world of Civil the Judge CANNOT give that order, and he won’t.
      WHY? The contempt of court reporting restriction does restrain the Judge and if he breaches this it’s a Judicial review at the Royal Courts of Justice and he gets fired.
      So in brief there is no chance in hell that the feed supply will ever be cut off.
      I can’t say that this is the same in every country. But they have to dig a hole in the street to get that done. I’m not saying that it can’t be done but the National grid will tell the Judge to fuck off.
      They can do anything in the Movies. The Bureaucratic red tape for digging a hole in the street alone can take months.
      The Billing Company is just that. It’s a metering and Billing service also licensed by the criminal cabal dba Government, Which also means in economic terms the Gas/Elec is 92% Tax the same as fuel.
      A Billing company does not provide any Gas/Elec.
      It’s just an extension of government by the license Billing company.
      The Gas/Elec meter is NOT owned by the Billing company either and all they have is the serial number of the meter on record.
      So without that serial number on record which gets moved from Billing company to billing company when you change billing company, they have no reason to Bill you or enter your home.
      I am now using the words Billing company because they do not provide the Gas/Elec. Can you see how the language they use is also fraud??
      The very contract is Fraud and there can never be that full disclosure of the Fact that they are just a Billing company under licence from the government OFGEM office.
      The Government do not have the legal authority to sign that OFGEM Billing company licence because the people have never signed that Legal Consent. NONE of the Acts and Statutes are legally enforceable without the consent of the governed.
      So it’s end-to-end fraud and the unsigned paper they never sign is the proof of that fact. Companies Act 2006 section 44. Please go read it.
      www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/44
      Everything has to be signed by an authorised person. Well the Billing Company itself is not the authorised person, is it?
      This is why nothing is ever signed.
      Fraud Act 2006 section 4(2) Fraud by abuse of position when it is an act of omission. It’s not signed. AND they can’t legally sign it so they don’t. It's all about the Paper evidence and they send that to you.
      www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/section/4
      It is in your hand. Material evidence of fraud sent by the fraudsters, This brings us once again back to the Claim and the MAXIM...
      "He who makes a claim carries the OBLIGATION to provide the Material substance of the Claim. Otherwise, the claim is fraudulent and it is also a known CHARGEABLE, Criminal offence. "
      The signed authorization does not exist.
      You don't need to go to court.
      What everyone should be doing, is getting a responsible fitter to fit YOUR OWN meter in your OWN home. There are thousands of meters on eBay.

  • @TheFreedomStudioChannel
    @TheFreedomStudioChannel 7 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    As far as telling us what we should or shouldn't do, the only things we shouldn't do are those things that violate natural (common) law, such as causing harm, loss, injury, ie. murder, assaut, rape, theft, trespassing, coercion and deception. Everything else that does not infringe on another person's rights IS a right, regardless of what you or anyone else claims to the contrary. Having said that, there is an issue where people contractually give away certain rights through commerce/government, and that is why knowing common law is so important.

  • @connorking2222
    @connorking2222 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    Hi Dan, the “drone as a missile” idea is likely crossover from the US military technology export restrictions. It falls under a process called ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations) where the US have strict regulations to prevent the sale of NATO/allied military technology to hostile states. Current military drones, such as the MQ-9 Reaper, fall under this bracket and the same regulations cover cruise missiles and ICBMs. This is why a lot of people, incorrectly, say a drone is like a missile. It might be grouped from a technology perspective the same as a Tomahawk missile but the classification of a drone will be weight based. Love the videos, please keep them coming!

  • @nickjung7394
    @nickjung7394 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In my, albeit limited experience of the County Court system, there are a number of serious flaws. Firstly, although court hearings are recorded, the cost of a transcript is very high. However, even if one pays for a transcript, it is impossible to check it for accuracy because there is no system through which the audio file can be obtained. This, very effectively makes it impossible to follow the reasoning behind the Judges decision with any degree of certainty.
    It also seems unfair that a company can refuse to send the person who produced and signed a witness statement in their defence and can, instead, send a barrister who then "only acts under instructions" and is permitted to avoid any consequences of their actions. (Nuremberg springs to mind).

    • @newagetemplar6100
      @newagetemplar6100 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Legal system is flawed , a relative lied in county court and ruined my family’s life , apparently lie’s told in count court don’t matter , bollocks !

  • @peterjones5254
    @peterjones5254 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

    "Strawman isn't defined in any legislation"?
    Said every member of the corporate BAR!

    • @willtellall638
      @willtellall638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +10

      Energy Companies DO NOT own your meters. Yes you heard me right.
      Let’s get out of the habit also of calling energy companies suppliers when they aren’t any such thing. There BROKERS! Selling you debt. Which is fraud.
      ABOUT ENERGY COMPANIES
      Let me explain about energy companies and what they can and CANNOT do.
      The electric and gas supply to the house or company cannot be cut off ever. Well, not in the UK.
      The world of the movies is different. Once installed that supply of Gas or Elec or Water will be maintained because the National grid is not the energy billing company.
      It's a separate company called the National Grid who have a contract with the government and they will not breach that contract and the judge has no authority to override that contract.
      So not even a court order can have that Gas/Elec/Water feed cut off. This is why they want to get in your house and fit a prepay meter.
      Now this is Civil and in the world of Civil the Judge CANNOT give that order, and he won’t.
      WHY? The contempt of court reporting restriction does restrain the Judge and if he breaches this it’s a Judicial review at the Royal Courts of Justice and he gets fired.
      So in brief there is no chance in hell that the feed supply will ever be cut off.
      I can’t say that this is the same in every country. But they have to dig a hole in the street to get that done. I’m not saying that it can’t be done but the National grid will tell the Judge to fuck off.
      They can do anything in the Movies. The Bureaucratic red tape for digging a hole in the street alone can take months.
      The Billing Company is just that. It’s a metering and Billing service also licensed by the criminal cabal dba Government, Which also means in economic terms the Gas/Elec is 92% Tax the same as fuel.
      A Billing company does not provide any Gas/Elec.
      It’s just an extension of government by the license Billing company.
      The Gas/Elec meter is NOT owned by the Billing company either and all they have is the serial number of the meter on record.
      So without that serial number on record which gets moved from Billing company to billing company when you change billing company, they have no reason to Bill you or enter your home.
      I am now using the words Billing company because they do not provide the Gas/Elec. Can you see how the language they use is also fraud??
      The very contract is Fraud and there can never be that full disclosure of the Fact that they are just a Billing company under licence from the government OFGEM office.
      The Government do not have the legal authority to sign that OFGEM Billing company licence because the people have never signed that Legal Consent. NONE of the Acts and Statutes are legally enforceable without the consent of the governed.
      So it’s end-to-end fraud and the unsigned paper they never sign is the proof of that fact. Companies Act 2006 section 44. Please go read it.
      www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/44
      Everything has to be signed by an authorised person. Well the Billing Company itself is not the authorised person, is it?
      This is why nothing is ever signed.
      Fraud Act 2006 section 4(2) Fraud by abuse of position when it is an act of omission. It’s not signed. AND they can’t legally sign it so they don’t. It's all about the Paper evidence and they send that to you.
      www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/section/4
      It is in your hand. Material evidence of fraud sent by the fraudsters, This brings us once again back to the Claim and the MAXIM...
      "He who makes a claim carries the OBLIGATION to provide the Material substance of the Claim. Otherwise, the claim is fraudulent and it is also a known CHARGEABLE, Criminal offence. "
      The signed authorization does not exist.
      You don't need to go to court.
      What everyone should be doing, is getting a responsible fitter to fit YOUR OWN meter in your OWN home. There are thousands of meters on eBay.

    • @ven11000
      @ven11000 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      🎉 clearly the corruption and collusion runs deep. Why are council’s issuing summons? , is it illegal to impersonate a court of record, leading into perjury and fraud. But we must come see you and pay for advise? There was No case file, no case file number, no progression officer the court was hired and the judge is not under his her oath, please explain this BBB

    • @deanrobertson8358
      @deanrobertson8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Exactly

    • @johns7272
      @johns7272 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@willtellall638 so do you reckon we can take them to court for this fraud? LOL

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@willtellall638 moronic.

  • @nickharman4584
    @nickharman4584 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I have a friend who buried their head in the sand, the supplier obtained a warrant of entry to replace the meters with PAYG ones. Got a knock on the door one morning from an engineer with a locksmith.

    • @willgoodfellow
      @willgoodfellow 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WSmith_1984 Says who?

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WSmith_1984 did a bloke down the pub tell you this ?

    • @yorkiemike
      @yorkiemike 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@WSmith_1984 can you provide a source for that clear nonsense?

    • @paulhillman400
      @paulhillman400 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      ​@@yorkiemikeIt was that bloke down the pub.

  • @Miles_Ahead547
    @Miles_Ahead547 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Strawman is a switch and bait , I would ask for the obligation

  • @tonycraig7525
    @tonycraig7525 8 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    When our mothers or fathers register us at birth they are actually signing us into slavery to the state.Read it and interpret the legalese properly.

  • @keithianlocke
    @keithianlocke 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    A company applied through Northampton Court against my wife just before we were made homeless by landlord.
    I spoke with verbally, and emailed the court to inform them, and requested all correspondence be issued to my wife via her email, with myself cc in.
    Didn't hear anything for 2yrs. Then a letter came through our new residence letterbox which stated a ccj was issued against my wife, and after tracking her address they were sending bailiffs around. I spoke to court and explained that we had informed them, and had the email still in my account. The lady found notes in case file regarding the contact, and quickly changed her attitude and made a note of it in the case file, and I made her read back what she wrote.
    Covid hit, and haven't heard anything since.
    I had a debt company apply to Northampton for an old catalogue account. I denied knowledge of claim and asked for more info. The info they sent was so full of contradictions and wrong info. So I sent a defense which solely relied on pointing out all the wrong information, and the contradictions and falsehoods in the case claim. I advised the judged that the claimant was clearly presenting false and misleading information to the court for financial gain. And as that is against the law, the judge should throw out the claim, and deal with both the legal professional, and their supervisor mentioned in the claim, with the full force of the judges power with regard to that offense.
    The claimant immediately withdrew the claim.
    My advice is read the claim very, very carefully. Ask the claimant for further evidence and proof of claim, as many either don't have any, or have some and not full evidence, and some just make it up.

  • @RB-qg1qx
    @RB-qg1qx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    Qualified electrician here, don't change/tamper/interfere with your meter, you are very likely to get yourself in trouble or injure yourself.

    • @deanrobertson8358
      @deanrobertson8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

      Thats why u get a professional to fit it. There is no law, that says we can't change to our own metres.

    • @RB-qg1qx
      @RB-qg1qx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@deanrobertson8358 But what's the point in fitting your own meter? Assuming the supplier agree to you having your own meter installed they would require it to have been calibrated to show power used same as the meter they fit. In addition the reason the supplier fit the seals on their equipment is to prevent people from 'fiddling' their meter readings. Give it a bash and let us know how you get on. good luck.

    • @deanrobertson8358
      @deanrobertson8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว +9

      @@RB-qg1qx you terminate the implied contract with the energy company. Send them the metres back signed for through royal mail so you have proof they dont have any property of thers in your house.... Then you keep your own meter readings and say every six months, you call transco or national grid give them the readings and try to make payment... They will tell you they csnt accept the payment because ITS ALREADY BEEN PAID FOR THROUGH GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS... How does the government get money... From us the tax payers... Witch in turn means gas and electric are already payed for through tax payers money.... Companies like sse, bulb, ect do not have gas or electricity to give they are brokers.

    • @deanrobertson8358
      @deanrobertson8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      @@RB-qg1qx YOU AND YOUR ENERGY BILL -
      Thanks Adrian James
      ABOUT ENERGY COMPANIES
      Let me explain about energy companies and what they can and CANNOT do.
      The electric and gas supply to the house or company cannot be cut off ever. Well not in the UK.
      The world of the movies is different. Once installed that supply of Gas or Elec or Water will be maintained because the National grid is not the energy billing company.
      It's a separate company called the National Grid who have the contract with the government and they will not breach that contract and the judge has no authority to override that contract.
      So not even a court order can have that Gas/Elec/Water feed cut off. Which is why they want to get in your house and fit a prepay meter.
      Now this is Civil and in the world of Civil the Judge CANNOT give that order, and he won’t.
      WHY? The contempt of court reporting restriction do restrain the Judge and if he breaches this it’s a Judicial review at the Royal Courts of Justice and he gets fired.
      So in brief there is no chance in hell that the feed supply will ever be cut off.
      I can’t say that this is the same in every country. But they have to dig a hole in the street to get that done. I’m not saying that it can’t be done but the National grid will tell the Judge to fuck off.
      They can do anything in the Movies. The Bureaucratic red tape for digging a hole in the street alone can take months.
      The Billing Company is just that. It’s a metering and Billing service also licensed by the criminal cabal dba Government, Which also means in economic terms the Gas/Elec is 92% Tax the same as fuel.
      A Billing company does not provide any Gas/Elec.
      It’s just an extension of government by the licence Billing company.
      The Gas/Elec meter is NOT owned by the Billing company either and all they have is the serial number of the meter on record.
      So without that serial number on record which gets moved from Billing company to billing company when you change billing company, they have no reason to Bill you or enter your home.
      I am now using the words Billing company because they do not provide the Gas/Elec. Can you see how the language they use is also fraud??
      The very contract is Fraud and there can never be that full disclosure to the Fact that they are just a Billing company under licence from the government OFGEM office.
      The Government do not have the Legal authority to sign that OFGEM Billing company licence because the people have never signed that Legal Consent. NONE of the Acts and Statutes are legal enforceable without the consent of the governed.
      So it’s end to end fraud and the unsigned paper they never sign is the proof of that fact. Companies Act 2006 section 44. Go read it.
      Everything has to be signed by an authorised person. Well the Billing Company itself is not the authorised person, is it?
      Which is why nothing is ever signed.
      Fraud Act 2006 section 4(2) Fraud by abuse of position when it is an Act of omission. It’s not signed. AND they can’t legally sign it so they don’t. Its all about the Paper evidence and they send that to you.
      It is in your hand. Material evidence of fraud sent by the fraudsters,
      Which brings us once again back to the Claim and to the MAXIM..
      "He who makes a claim carries the OBLIGATION to provide the Material substance of the Claim. Otherwise the claim is fraudulent in nature and it is also a known CHARGEABLE, Criminal offence.
      The signed authorisation does not exist.
      You don't need to go to court.
      What everyone should be doing, is getting a responsible fitter to fit YOUR OWN meter in your OWN home. There are thousands of meters on Ebay.
      🔗 ALSO SEE: UK - GAS, ELECTRIC AND WATER ARE FREE TO DOMESTIC CUSTOMERS

    • @RB-qg1qx
      @RB-qg1qx 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@deanrobertson8358 That's great Dean but again I ask what's the point of fitting your own meter? If you fit your own meter and pay for the energy used via that reading instead of using 'their' equipment surely it's a mute point? Maybe i'm missing something here and everyone simply wants free gas leccie and H2O?

  • @LightDiodeNeal
    @LightDiodeNeal 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    I wish I had this "to hand" in 2009
    I genuinely had to offer to set fire to myself in my energy supplier's office car-park to get any kind of extension to threats of CCJ during the credit crunch. Luckily their office was 1/4 mile from my front door and petrol was only 70p/litre.
    Irony was I literally got rain from their cooling towers just across the M1.
    Bigger irony, I refusing to pay because I was paying for pre-pay cards for their pre-pay meter, which they claimed was there for "rationing".!?
    Cheers BB and Foof & Alan! I'm learning some new stuff thanks

    • @willtellall638
      @willtellall638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Energy Companies DO NOT own your meters. Yes you heard me right.
      Let’s get out of the habit also of calling energy companies suppliers when they aren’t any such thing. There BROKERS! Selling you debt. Which is fraud.
      ABOUT ENERGY COMPANIES
      Let me explain about energy companies and what they can and CANNOT do.
      The electric and gas supply to the house or company cannot be cut off ever. Well, not in the UK.
      The world of the movies is different. Once installed that supply of Gas or Elec or Water will be maintained because the National grid is not the energy billing company.
      It's a separate company called the National Grid who have a contract with the government and they will not breach that contract and the judge has no authority to override that contract.
      So not even a court order can have that Gas/Elec/Water feed cut off. This is why they want to get in your house and fit a prepay meter.
      Now this is Civil and in the world of Civil the Judge CANNOT give that order, and he won’t.
      WHY? The contempt of court reporting restriction does restrain the Judge and if he breaches this it’s a Judicial review at the Royal Courts of Justice and he gets fired.
      So in brief there is no chance in hell that the feed supply will ever be cut off.
      I can’t say that this is the same in every country. But they have to dig a hole in the street to get that done. I’m not saying that it can’t be done but the National grid will tell the Judge to fuck off.
      They can do anything in the Movies. The Bureaucratic red tape for digging a hole in the street alone can take months.
      The Billing Company is just that. It’s a metering and Billing service also licensed by the criminal cabal dba Government, Which also means in economic terms the Gas/Elec is 92% Tax the same as fuel.
      A Billing company does not provide any Gas/Elec.
      It’s just an extension of government by the license Billing company.
      The Gas/Elec meter is NOT owned by the Billing company either and all they have is the serial number of the meter on record.
      So without that serial number on record which gets moved from Billing company to billing company when you change billing company, they have no reason to Bill you or enter your home.
      I am now using the words Billing company because they do not provide the Gas/Elec. Can you see how the language they use is also fraud??
      The very contract is Fraud and there can never be that full disclosure of the Fact that they are just a Billing company under licence from the government OFGEM office.
      The Government do not have the legal authority to sign that OFGEM Billing company licence because the people have never signed that Legal Consent. NONE of the Acts and Statutes are legally enforceable without the consent of the governed.
      So it’s end-to-end fraud and the unsigned paper they never sign is the proof of that fact. Companies Act 2006 section 44. Please go read it.
      www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/46/section/44
      Everything has to be signed by an authorised person. Well the Billing Company itself is not the authorised person, is it?
      This is why nothing is ever signed.
      Fraud Act 2006 section 4(2) Fraud by abuse of position when it is an act of omission. It’s not signed. AND they can’t legally sign it so they don’t. It's all about the Paper evidence and they send that to you.
      www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/35/section/4
      It is in your hand. Material evidence of fraud sent by the fraudsters, This brings us once again back to the Claim and the MAXIM...
      "He who makes a claim carries the OBLIGATION to provide the Material substance of the Claim. Otherwise, the claim is fraudulent and it is also a known CHARGEABLE, Criminal offence. "
      The signed authorization does not exist.
      You don't need to go to court.
      What everyone should be doing, is getting a responsible fitter to fit YOUR OWN meter in your OWN home. There are thousands of meters on eBay.

    • @bestofnature-h7i
      @bestofnature-h7i 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@willtellall638 Have you a vlog or somewhere to contact you? You cut thru the legality succinctly yet subtly. Now, just have to check how it's organised here in Ireland.

    • @winstonsmithsoul
      @winstonsmithsoul 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@willtellall638
      Thanks for your post, interesting it’s not the top comment. Strange how the algorithm works. Obviously it doesn’t work for us.

    • @willtellall638
      @willtellall638 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      My comments are now deleted replies anyway

    • @LightDiodeNeal
      @LightDiodeNeal 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@willtellall638 I believe the trouble I had was because the previous divvy occupiers had put in their own meter.. I don't think I believed it at the time but think you've explained why some divs think they can.. I blame the internet!

  • @arricammarques1955
    @arricammarques1955 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    The freeman on the land a load of rubbish.

    • @simonjamesodell
      @simonjamesodell 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      That's a political stance. If that group formed a party and got elected, their ideas no matter how you feel about them, would be the law.

  • @TillyBarrett-ro3xp
    @TillyBarrett-ro3xp หลายเดือนก่อน

    What if you never agreed into a contract with the electricity company to begin with? All letters say to occupier until recently they've added someone's name who doesn't live at the address nor on the tenancy. Vulnerable adults in the household on pip and struggling with hardship and big life changes. Are they allowed to put a meter in the property by force of entry with police? If I keep my front and back gates locked and doors locked and get a no trespassing sign and ask them to leave and stay civil are they allowed to force their way into the home? The name on the letter saying to go court doesn't even live at this address? I don't agree with the prices they were trying to charge me was over £200 a month for 2 people in a 3 bed home.

  • @notmenotme614
    @notmenotme614 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    28:37 Many Freelancers / contractor workers also set themselves up as a “limited company”. Usually for tax reasons.

    • @nileamish2313
      @nileamish2313 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      IR35 is killing this Countries Economy and causing more probs than it was meant to solve!

    • @NeilCWCampbell
      @NeilCWCampbell 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Accrual purposes.
      Fixed it for you 🙂

    • @sirbarney3837
      @sirbarney3837 ปีที่แล้ว

      What tax benefits would that be? As a limited company is a legal entity,that you happen to own,doesn’t diminish your liability for tax if you pay yourself a wage or ‘director remuneration’.

    • @notmenotme614
      @notmenotme614 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@sirbarney3837 It might have changed now. But at one point an “employee of a limited company” paid less tax than a freelancer. I know many who did this. Maybe they were VAT exempt as well ! If the purchase was for “the company”. For example, their car would be a company car.

  • @eventgroup
    @eventgroup ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What does the legal term "BAR" actually stand for?

    • @BlackBeltBarrister
      @BlackBeltBarrister  ปีที่แล้ว

      It originates from the wooden bar that barristers still stands in front of to this day

    • @eventgroup
      @eventgroup ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BlackBeltBarrister Once again you quote the indoctrination you have been subject to, it stands for "British Admiralty Registry" as our "legal" system which is not law is in fact law of the sea, much as "Black's Law" dictionary translations differ considerably from the "Oxford" & common law, true sovereign law, (law of the land), Hence the "Strawman" fictitious entity/vessel, the "person" (vessel) lost at sea... I suspect you know this & simply protecting the corrupt system your a significant part of, if not then you have received a "Legal indoctrination" & should do some research as this "Legal" system your apart of will soon be brought to its knees & exposed as the unlawful practice it is by the people.

    • @eventgroup
      @eventgroup ปีที่แล้ว

      @@BlackBeltBarrister So you were taught & you believe that when thinking of a good name for governing body of the legal system one of you pipped up and said "I know lets call it after this wooded bar we have in front of ourselves, and lets keep the bar so that we never forget" hmmm...... The indoctrination is ridiculous when you come to analyse it, it stands for "British Admiralty Registry" as our "legal" system which is not law is in fact law of the sea, much as "Black's Law" dictionary translations differ drastically from the "Oxford" & common law, true sovereign law, (law of the land), Hence the "Strawman" fictitious entity/vessel, the "person" (vessel) lost at sea presumed dead, hence why you are "Summons" to court much like a dead person/vessel ... I suspect you know this & simply protecting the corrupt system to which your a part, if not then you have received a "Legal indoctrination" & should do some research as this "Legal" system your apart of will soon be brought to its knees & exposed as the unlawful practice it is by the people.

  • @linuxretrogamer
    @linuxretrogamer 2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

    Re: Nord VPN - What is the legality of using it to stream content that isn't supposed to be available to you?

  • @AnnFBug
    @AnnFBug ปีที่แล้ว

    With regard to your sponsor, one of the most entertaining things about having a VPN, is that you can get your adverts in another language. And if several devices are linked to different countries, it is even more fun.
    For example, that ‘amazing heater that heats up a room in seconds while using a teaspoon of fuel, is, you find out, designed by a national of every country that advertises it, with an indigenous name as well! I am thinking of making a list of all the poor, but public spirited, students, in all the different countries, who then got kicked out of their universities, because they refused to sell the patent to a ‘greedy’ big business!

  • @monicaduncan7109
    @monicaduncan7109 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Floof is getting so big now, absolutely gorgeous and so loveable ❤️

  • @kasegiyabu5030
    @kasegiyabu5030 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    14:07 I had the utilities company admitting that the penalties they'd added to my account were down to their mistakes. They agreed to zero my account, removing the penalties. They never did. It continues to build and that after I confirmed with them that they'd agreed to zero the account. Sometimes talking is a waste of time. I'll just continue to pay for what I use and allow the unpaid penalties to attract further penalties. Eventually I'll get bored and take legal advice.
    As it's this channel: *could I sue the company for the damage this must be doing to my credit rating, in addition to having the penalties removed?*

  • @mickymondo7463
    @mickymondo7463 2 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    I have always considered the law as advisory, and I always treat it as subservient to common sense, however the supposed upholders of the law, are, on the whole rather defcient in their actual knowledge of the law, and suffer an abysmal lack of the latter.

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You of course know better with your university of Google law degree.

    • @mickymondo7463
      @mickymondo7463 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@snowflakemelter1172 The vast majority of the police supposedly upholding the law have little idea about those laws, especially traffic.

    • @servicekid7453
      @servicekid7453 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ah, then you won’t mind if i treat is advisory not to come and burgle your house? Thanks very much, I shall enjoy your stuff 👍🏻👍🏻

    • @mickymondo7463
      @mickymondo7463 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@servicekid7453 I'm sure the antique bear traps will remove your lower leg easily or the booby traps tht will impale you if you attempt to leave, that's if the diamond wire garotte doesn't get you first. The woodchipper in the shed and the pig farms down the road should take care of whatever remains of you. Burgle at yuor own risk

    • @servicekid7453
      @servicekid7453 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@mickymondo7463 nice try. Your house is not a lost temple from an Indiana Jones movie. I'll be in and gone in 10 minutes

  • @The0ldg0at
    @The0ldg0at 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The grid is like the supermarket, the meter is like the cashier that is looking at the thing you are taking out of the supermarket. So asking if is legal to take electricity from the grid and bypass the meter is like asking if it legal to take something out of the supermarket and bypass the cashier.

    • @keithdon3313
      @keithdon3313 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      The grid provides energy. The Meter reads the energy use. The supplier claims they are supplying you with energy. If the supplier cannot provide any evidence that they actually provided you with energy, you would be within your rights to withhold payment? it's not a refusal to pay for the energy you've used. it's a refusal to pay someone who has made a claim without any evidence they have actually provided the service you agreed to pay for.
      It's simple misdirection. Energy companies do not provide energy. They read meters and are used to increase costs without you questioning the government about it.

    • @roseyk7677
      @roseyk7677 ปีที่แล้ว

      Not exactly

    • @CosmicSeeker69
      @CosmicSeeker69 ปีที่แล้ว

      What you're ignoring is: we haven't paid decades of tax to the supermarket.. And THAT'S where the huge difference is

    • @nightingale9679
      @nightingale9679 ปีที่แล้ว

      Legal is corporate. 🤔🤔🤔🤔

  • @simonyoungglostog
    @simonyoungglostog 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    My understanding of 'Common-Law', is that it is a law that has been ruled on by a judge; effectively, it has been interpreted within a context.

    • @NoOne-hq9cp
      @NoOne-hq9cp 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They merged common law with admiralty many moons ago

    • @paddymcginley
      @paddymcginley 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Correct. Common law = case law

    • @moali7158
      @moali7158 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes. Having studied law, common law is case law.

    • @Hammerman837
      @Hammerman837 ปีที่แล้ว

      No, common means people, common law is the law of the people

    • @autumn5852
      @autumn5852 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Hammerman837what other kind of law is there - law of pigs or zebras 🤷🏻‍♀️

  • @philipcable7518
    @philipcable7518 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Any solicitor, Barrister or Judge knows that the wording in law is EVERYTHING.
    To say the "Strawman" is nonsense is misleading.
    Also notice the verbal disclaimers.
    Other than that very informative and helpful.

    • @williamwoods8022
      @williamwoods8022 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yep you will not get them mentioning any of this being exposed in this video here and especially the FACT that everything is PREPAID and then they scam us into paying again th-cam.com/video/98qv9ztkW_U/w-d-xo.html

    • @paddymcginley
      @paddymcginley 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      He's right, they never refer to 'the strawman'. But he's hiding the truth and he knows it. Weasel.

  • @Flowerpot24
    @Flowerpot24 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Most energy companies will do what they can to prevent disconnection of supply.
    Communication with said suppliers is paramount.

  • @gleefulme9617
    @gleefulme9617 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Your dog is very handsome & such a good boy!

  • @xdthread2794
    @xdthread2794 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    So if I turned off my electricity and the meter recorded zero usage, can I then charge the electricity company for storage of their meter.
    I enquired about having the meter moved because it was occupying a part of my house that I am unable to use. So I will ask the question again. Can I charge them for storage for their equipment. As I'm thinking of going off grid.

    • @notmenotme614
      @notmenotme614 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      With the cost of installing everything. How many decades will it take before going off grid pays for itself?

    • @xdthread2794
      @xdthread2794 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@notmenotme614 some people spend their money on holidays, some on fast cars or gambling.
      Me I like to spend my money and time on home projects that mean nothing to anyone else.
      So it wouldn't worry me after all I could drop dead tomorrow anyway. But for others you have a valid point. Thank you for you response. Although my original question is still unanswered.

    • @dianegriffen2756
      @dianegriffen2756 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Their property is on your property. Yes you can.

    • @williamwoods8022
      @williamwoods8022 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yes you can - if you no longer want to CONTRACT with them then they have to remove their property plus they are involved in DOUBLE DIPPING and FRAUD anyway as exposed in this video here as everything is PREPAID from the Trusts that the governments and legal system "forgot" to tell us we all have had since the day we were born and then they con us into paying again th-cam.com/video/98qv9ztkW_U/w-d-xo.html Just inform them that you no longer wish to contract with them and give them 30 days to remove their equipment and that if they do not they will agreeing to your terms to contract for storage at any amount you wish to charge per day - My charge is £1 million per day especially for "debt" collectors etc.

    • @snowflakemelter1172
      @snowflakemelter1172 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      You can't charge for storage of an item unless you have a valid contract they agreed to. If you want to sue them for the space used in your house by a shoe box sized meter then the damages would have to be calculated, which would be literally nothing. The claim would be thrown out and you would be told to stop wasting the courts time.

  • @folkmoot36
    @folkmoot36 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    Seems there's a lot of comment blocking on this channel.

  • @oliverlind6596
    @oliverlind6596 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    i've got national grid wanting to replace my gas meter because they've condemned it. British gas are trying to charge me as a business, even though its a 1 bedroom flat. Even Ofgen doesn't know whats going on anymore, its in limbo. I capped the supply myself 8 months ago (licensed gas engineer) but am still getting billed for 'read' readings. BG claim i owe £3.5k in one year for gas. Still haven't changed it to domestic, even when they sent their own debt collector avarto out and they agreed it was wrong.

  • @jimthorne304
    @jimthorne304 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Magna Carta is widely misunderstood, as I former Civil Servant I had frequently to disabuse callers that there was something in Magna Carta which they were relying upon. MC is a statute, like any other, it can be amended by Parliament, and, as you say, very little of it remains in force today. Most of it went centuries ago.

  • @BuddyHedrick-px5iu
    @BuddyHedrick-px5iu 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Anybody who knows anything about electricity knows that if you remove the meter you disconnect your power. Removing your meter is only feasible if you have your own power source such as wind or solar. The reason people remove their meters when they provide their own power is to not provide greedy power companies with free electricity. By law if you supply excess power into the grid they do not have to pay you for it. So those of us who generate our own electricity have removed our meters so that the power companies can't get their hands on our Access energy unless they agree to pay for it.

  • @harleyfairway843
    @harleyfairway843 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    I Believe the Energy Companies “Right of Entry” is only if their is immediate THREAT TO LIFE or An Emergency regarding live exposed Cables or Fracktured Gas Pipes?!! Not for a Civil matter ! Is this True?,Also does the Warrant have to be issued by a Court in Your Area or from Northern Scotland say ?!👍🤔‼️👏🙏❤️✌️😇🇬🇧

    • @jons9721
      @jons9721 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Where does the magical idea that physical force cannot be used to enforce civil matters, physical force can be used to remove trespassers, physical force can be used to enforce commercial debt and even in the case of non-commercial debt once a court agent is in the house it's a criminal offence to interfere with them?
      Basically, civil matters don't mean its illegal for someone to punch you in the face depending on the circumstances while it will be illegal for the civil offender to use force themselves.
      Shouting its 'civil' isn't a get out of jail card in fact it can be a go to jail card if you aren't careful

    • @willtellall638
      @willtellall638 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      All of their paperwork is fraudulent that’s why they never show you the signed documents.

    • @jons9721
      @jons9721 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@willtellall638 Everything was computerised 30 years ago, no one uses written signatures anymore or in fact paper

    • @deanrobertson8358
      @deanrobertson8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@jons9721 that is illegal it must have a wet signature from a judge.

    • @jons9721
      @jons9721 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@deanrobertson8358 Read that on the internet?
      Scummy people have no rights and should just do what they are told by their superiors

  • @garethwilliams4418
    @garethwilliams4418 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    In regards to the meter issue, what's the fine for abstraction of energy, I'm sure it's less than people's energy bills, is it an imprisonable offense?

    • @KravKernow
      @KravKernow 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It is. Max sentence is five years. In practice max sentence is 12 weeks; and that's more for organised commercial tampering. For individuals it's usually low level community order.
      I am of course *not* suggesting people do in fact go down that route. Not least because you still owe the money.

  • @lukemorton8431
    @lukemorton8431 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The dog is fake. It's a robot dog

    • @BlackBeltBarrister
      @BlackBeltBarrister  2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Ooooo k!

    • @monicaduncan7109
      @monicaduncan7109 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

    • @philipdeacon5186
      @philipdeacon5186 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The dog looks real to me

    • @markdunkling1604
      @markdunkling1604 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@BlackBeltBarrister BBB now here's one for you and Robert- if a pet had a legal identity - what about our feathered friends who visit our gardens -they are not pets - but are now terrorised by a legally recognised entity

    • @lukemorton8431
      @lukemorton8431 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@philipdeacon5186 it's just a robot with feathers on

  • @noell8460
    @noell8460 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think you should cover what is supposed to happen at administrative courts, I've seen lots of claims that these cases never see a judge, they simply get stamped by a member of the adminstrative staff, and if that is the case, what does it mean? is an Order, Judgement or Warrent that doesn't pass before the eyes of a judge actually lawful ?

  • @13alir
    @13alir 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Wow everybody on here is asleep or daft. You can change your metres but look into it b4 you do, there are things you need to do first. If you are summoned to court it is only an invitation, you do not have to attend. Please read up on it, do some research. These guys are trying to blag you as they are part of the cooparation and don't want men and women to have what is theirs by berth right. Yes do not listen to these maritime mugs

    • @annoyingbstard9407
      @annoyingbstard9407 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What’s a cooparation?

    • @13alir
      @13alir 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@annoyingbstard9407 hi, a cooparation is for eg: the self appointed royal family and the government, they make money from us but, they don't pay any taxes or they pay very very little tax compared to us . Do a bit of research and you will find out lots about our government and royal family and other people that have put us into slavery to make money off us. When you are born and you parents register your birth, that certificate " the original one" goes off to the vatican and your parents get "a copy" . So when you are registered you are supposed to get and amount of gold to set you up for your life but that gold does with your certificate to the vatican, basically its stolen from you when you are a baby. Then then you are declared lost at sea and presumed dead so they " look after your gold" by playing the stock markets. In your lifetime they can make millions from your Strawman money that you should of had. So you are lost at sea , presumed dead and you are a legal fiction, you do not exist but they have what is legally yours. Hope this helps you

    • @martinhsl68hw
      @martinhsl68hw 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You absolutely can't change your metres. They're fixed at the distance light travels in exactly 1/299792458 of a second

  • @Tashio240
    @Tashio240 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Surely though, you can charge your supplier for rental space, as they have their meter on your private property?

    • @servicekid7453
      @servicekid7453 ปีที่แล้ว

      Nope. Providing space for a meter is part of your contract with the utility supplier

  • @COLDMKULTRA
    @COLDMKULTRA 2 ปีที่แล้ว +8

    Be prepared for a barrage of comments attempting to correct you from the"Sovereign Citizen" community 😂🤣😅

    • @moali7158
      @moali7158 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes. There alot of pretentious people on here who don't know the law, but assume the law.

    • @SolarCrossGames
      @SolarCrossGames ปีที่แล้ว

      Their understanding is poor but their motives come from a feeling that something is wrong in a society that allows a clique of knuckle dragging "public servants" to run up debts in their name and force payment for unwanted services like a literal mafia. I suppose sovereign citzens and freemen will eventually realise the only real remedies to the big state are migration (to somewhere better), secession or revolution (both of which imply fighting).

  • @terryteztattersall
    @terryteztattersall 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What if you generate your own electricity and take nothing from the grid. Surely meters, that are charged for, can then be removed!

  • @paulvandergroen9569
    @paulvandergroen9569 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    I am fixated and fascinated by this.
    Are all clever buggers bald ?

    • @winstonsmithsoul
      @winstonsmithsoul 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      I’m proof that’s incorrect lol

  • @_sparkydan
    @_sparkydan ปีที่แล้ว

    An electrician cannot remove the meter by law, nor can we pull the fuse by law! The reason given to us is that the equipment does not belong to us and so it is theft and or trespassing, the correct procedure is that a request is made to the owner of the equipment i.e. the provider to remove the fuse for us and usually an isolator be fitted for us to safely connect back into. This situation is common when carrying out a Rewire or consumer unit upgrade within a domestic property 👍

  • @thepvporg
    @thepvporg 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Many years ago my meter was damaged by the former tenant, the energy company replaced the meter and then recovered the debt from me. They said that they didn't believe that I was who I said I was despite the tenancy agreement and recovered £750 of debt off me fro someone else's debt despite me telling them where the tenant had moved to. So I have little regard for energy companies being pushy. Moving forward 10 years, the meter failed again and it got replaced, I wasn't happy with the fact that when it went £4.99 in arrears, putting £10 on the key only gave me £4.99 credit. They were charging 2p and not 1p for the £0.00 jump from, a programming error which I found out and to shut me up from going public, I was given a credit meter.
    These days the credit meter is read quarterly and still this energy company try every way they can to add £10 late fees despite telling them when I will be paying the bill. They also expect 7 days to pay the bill when I know that I have up to 28 days to pay the bill in accordance with the law as well as that they fail to put the date of the bill in print and this bill can arrive up to 10 days after the meter reading yet claim that the bill, for example my last bill 15th July was the date of the bill when they read the gas meter on the 16th, the bill arrived on the 26th of the month and they were bitching about late payments.
    I emailed them and told them to stop harassing me as I had said that the bill will be settled by the 15th of the month (August) and had cleared the bill, they raised another bill 34 days after the initial bill, claimed I had not paid the bill, added another (estimated) amount to the bill to pay which was something like £172.89 when all I was to pay in reality was £70.14, I paid them the £70.14 as well to clear the bill, emailed them to this effect and warned them that this was harassment and that it was a shitty move by them as well as what my rights were under UK law and that they as an energy company were not above the law, they cheekly emailed back about the fact that they couldn't discuss the bill via email and wanted me to call them to which I told them no calling because email provides evidence of what was said as well as it being admissible in a court of law.
    I told them that if they pull another shitty stunt like that again then I will be moving energy suppliers.
    Not heard anything from them in a month.

  • @boxedproductions_4221
    @boxedproductions_4221 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Its all right all of this but the fact is under traditional common law the individual would be tried in a court of equals who would then judge on the validity of the crime, statute or decision. All these energy companies would be taken to court and they wouldnt have a leg to stand on.

    • @annoyingbstard9407
      @annoyingbstard9407 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      No one is “tried” for breach of contract under common law so no jury would ever be involved in the event of chasing a debt. If there were juries for civil cases we’d all be sitting in court for half the year.

  • @cameronhussain1931
    @cameronhussain1931 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Water electricity & even gas should be free

    • @nubiankemett7472
      @nubiankemett7472 หลายเดือนก่อน

      You can discharge these bills....😏

  • @julielevinge266
    @julielevinge266 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    The supplier can do almost whatever they want, they’re the supplier 😮
    Such good advice,always pay something,this protects you, gives you judges & courts sympathy if it ever reaches that point, such good advice✊♥️

    • @deanrobertson8358
      @deanrobertson8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Wrong

    • @deanrobertson8358
      @deanrobertson8358 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      They dont supply energy as they dont have gas or electricity to give

    • @williamwoods8022
      @williamwoods8022 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They supply you with NOTHING and then they scam you into paying for energy that you have already paid for as everything is PREPAID out of the Trusts that the corrupt puppet Governments, Courts etc "forgot" to tell us that we all have had since the day we were born as totally exposed in this video here th-cam.com/video/98qv9ztkW_U/w-d-xo.html

    • @subzbus33
      @subzbus33 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      They are energy brokers, not suppliers, energy brokers' services are only that of taking meter readings and billing you, they do not supply any raw gas/energy

    • @stephenhill8790
      @stephenhill8790 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      I was witness to a house being disconnected, western power removed the cable from the house, as the owner refuse to pay, after going to court the judge ruled in favour of the power company, the house owner had to pay the outstanding bills and a reconnect fee and a new meter

  • @_chrisr_
    @_chrisr_ ปีที่แล้ว

    You can't even move the meter yourself - you have to get the DNO (Distribution Network Operator) to move the incoming cabling for electrictiy or pipework for gas and the supply company to move the meter itself which is quite lengthy to arrange. Moving the electricty meter a small distance might be possible but with older cabling even moving it might be extremely dangerous.

  • @cadiss9997
    @cadiss9997 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thanks for explaining the legal implications of these interesting ideologies. Great stuff.

  • @mattwill2643
    @mattwill2643 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    You dont have to pay to show good will. You just need to agree to pay with conditions. If they cant provide your conditions then there's no dishonor on your part for not paying.

  • @peter3835
    @peter3835 2 หลายเดือนก่อน

    is it legal to disconnect your house from the grid ie so you can generate your own electricity ?

  • @PhoebeMc
    @PhoebeMc 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I can't fathom why anyone thinking the removal of an electrical meter would thereby make the electricity free!! That's nuts!!
    Glad Nord is supporting you! They're terrific!!

    • @al_gsxrw5309
      @al_gsxrw5309 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Because electric companies are billing companies they charge you for use of their meter..do ur research.

    • @NeilCWCampbell
      @NeilCWCampbell 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@al_gsxrw5309 citations required

    • @PhoebeMc
      @PhoebeMc ปีที่แล้ว

      @@al_gsxrw5309 Sorta my point - facetiously. "That would make the electricity free..." as in a joke. Don't need research to make a joke or to use common sense, but thanks, anyway.

  • @zephyrbear
    @zephyrbear 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Will they be increasing the maximum single transaction of £50 on the keys for pre-payment meters?

    • @thepeacefulmumma7055
      @thepeacefulmumma7055 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      They’ll have to cos a fiver will only get you 3 minutes now lol!

    • @NeilCWCampbell
      @NeilCWCampbell 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Why would you think this the case?

  • @NomadicNight
    @NomadicNight ปีที่แล้ว

    Your PAYG gas and electricity charges are out of date. Since July 2023, the government ordered all energy suppliers to charge the same rates as credit meters billed on receipt of monthly or quarterly bills.

  • @cyankirkpatrick5194
    @cyankirkpatrick5194 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    My big sister had her power cut off all the time because she spent her money on stupid things, and half in bills she was a widow with her late husband's benefits it didn't matter if she planned it right she could have lived comfortable but she was greedy and you know. She'd rather sponge off mom and dad still. But that got stopped when they died. As for me I'm just trying to be free.then I'll figure it out for myself.

  • @hurleyflyer263
    @hurleyflyer263 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    So was Teresa May, ex PM, incorrect then, when she said on the BBC, "we live under common law, by the CONSENT OF THE GOVERNED and no one is above that law" ? You both miss the point, we are sovereign, it matters not what a judge says, yes they can impose fines and forfeitures. Ultimately, the best you can do in your system, is imprison the body, but not the soul or the mind. When people get to the stage, of eating or heating, they don't care about your system.

  • @julielevinge266
    @julielevinge266 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Had a gas metre that apparently didn’t work?
    I informed the gas company regularly yet for 2 years had no bill?
    Eventually was taken to court for owing £900.
    Was able to show that I’d contacted them regularly to tell them I’d not been billed for gas?
    Judge ruled that mistake was gas company’s so I ended up getting free gas for nearly 2 years.
    Certain I’ve made up for it since😉
    ♥️Blackbelt Floof 🐾😊