Parliamentary Sovereignty and Where We Are Now after the Supreme Court Rwanda Judgment: CULS event

Dr Tom Hickman KC, who represented Gina Miller in both Miller cases and the Lord Advocate in the recent Scottish Independence Referendum reference, was joined by Dr Stefan Theil (professor in Public Law) to delve deeply into the current constitutional status of Parliamentary Sovereignty.
- Dr Tom Hickman KC: Overruling the Supreme Court’s Rwanda Judgment - what role now for Parliament?
- Dr Stefan Theil: Preventing judicial review of the Rwanda policy: practical and legal difficulties
For more information see the CULS website at: culs.org.uk

[@IKnowNeonLights]

Only Britain can say Britain is safe, and it does so by making sure it's parliamentary monarchy system achieves such state of safety which it as a state of Britain can say it is.
In that, common law and parliamentary sovereignty is included fully and independently functional.
The manipulation of either one is where the money is.
Which means any other countries are not safe, if and when Britain says so, it is how foreign ministries advice, and operate, as a necessary must.
It also how insurance and securities industries operate. Oh shnuc I just realised, I don't have an insurance policy.
😅

[@poco9964]

Change the title!