ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 11 เม.ย. 2018
- Anchor: Frank Rausan Pereira
Guests:
1. J Sai Deepak, Advocate, Supreme Court
2. Satya Prakash, Legal Editor, The Tribune
3. MP Singh, Former Chairperson, Delhi Judicial Academy
4. Justice Jaspal Singh, Former Judge Delhi High Court
Young Talented like j sai deepak need more on big picture shows
J sai deepak is simply the best in business.
Young advocate like Deepak overriding the old judge 😀😀😀
This will go as one of the best episodes of the big picture.
Praval Bhatt True!!
Feeling Sorry For Justice Singh.
Advocate Sai and Journalist Prakash you both made this episode one of the best episode of this year till now.
We always raise our voices against the NJAC as we think it would be an encroachment of appointing power by the executive.
But this is also not true.
A consideration is must as nothing is enough perfect that it is beyond the improvement.
Advocate Sai thank you for mentioning 'Not taking decision is also a best decision'.
And I before I wrap up my views I would like to appreciate Frank as your smile during the episode killed me.😆
Mohit Jha
Well Said Brother
Mohit Jha
Well Said Brother
Prashant kumar
Whatever you are mentioning no one can deny these facts
And it is also true and we all are well versed with all these.
Here, we are not discussing the best way of appointment of the judges.
HERE THE MATTER IS TO COUNTER THE DEADLOCK WHICH IS CURRENTLY STALLING THE APPOINTMENT OF THE JUDGES.
we must not fix ourselves only to the collegium system. As we can see this system nowadays became the most controversial and resulting in no appointment of the new judges like Indu Malhotra and the CJ of Uttarakhand.
We must consider another ways to ensure the appointment on a regular basis to smoothen the function of the supreme court.
If not NJAC then a modified version of that would be an option.Thank You
I was deeply engrossed in the debate until Mr Singh said there is no need of transparency in judicial appointment.
His views are as opaque as the judiciary.
J sai Deepak and Satya Prakash were pure gems in this debate.
divya das rightly said
Me too!!
Humbled by your comments. Regards
Ex Judges cry is like Islam खतरे में है।
I agree with Mr satya prakash and Deepak sir that there should be NJAC for appointment of Judges. It will not reduce the independence of the judiciary but it will bring transparency to the judiciary system.
Mr. Deepak and Mr. Prakash nailed it😀
sai deepak is miles ahead of everyone in articulation
Sai Deepak. Amazing u r man #respect
23:40 "... transparency is not the necessary part of the appointments of the judges". Somebody please kill me.
Kiran Ransing true that!!😂😂
They say Bollywood promotes nepotism and favouritism. But then you have Indian Judiciary giving tough competition. Severe allegations of the kith and kin of judges and other influential people in the judiciary benefiting from this system.
Actually he is saying that Independence of judiciary is more important then transparency.
and they are also against the interference of the executives who comes from a political party with their own personal interests.....transparency should be in the appointment but executive interference is unacceptable. ..emergency is one of the example as Judge rightly pointed out
deepak kumar u can give emergency as an example but there r thousands of examples of inefficiency n corruption in judiciary sys..point is there should be checks and balances better executive n legislature n judiciary
Kshitij Jain thats a nonsense statement
Satya prakash has made a big fan today.... Superb debate
Thanq M/s Sai Deepak n Satya Prakash for enlightening we the ordinary mortals abt the judicial appointments by the so-called collegium system n breaking the glass ceiing of the dubious superiority of judiciary over executive'''''
Came here for JSD but stayed for SP
Can we have J Sai Deepak more on the table? ^_^
Its heartening to see Satya dominating Sai,
Transparency not necessary for judges...what is Mr MP Singh saying???
Rohit Chakraborty nothing but nonsense
surely..what a man this MP Singh is!!
Very informative debate...Mr Sai Deepak had put points very well... Now I clearly understood the basic probelm... Mr Satya Prakash also rightly said today most of the people are using superlative saying to creat fear and take advantage
sir, please upload subtitles which are useful for deaf people
Right!
absolutely
tharun kumar ji you are right
tharun kumar 😲😲😲😲😲
Excellent Debate Again
i understood this issue perfectly clearly from this discussion. thank you RSTV
Judge vs advocate and editor..... Great great great and simply great
j sai deepak as usual,excellently articulated his views.Its very educative to hear Mr.Sai deepak on such issues.
tnx rs tv
Satyaprakash is the gem of the show, and the whole argument summed by him with facts and ideologies is really the way one should come for debate. Satyprakash, i would like to see you more on this debates.
Best debate.. may be younger among them but have more insight@sai deepak
The best of all is Add time bound hearing and closing of cases...all will fall within line....in court transparency will never show unless young bloods mixed in 80:20 ratio with old system...thanks to the courage of Sai
Good discussion about judges
Seriously the guy Justice Jaspal Singh is a frustrated person as most of the judiciary is that they cannot take criticism.
Awesome debate ...one of the best
Way forward...Revised and modified NJAC and judicial accountability bill
Great
J sai deepak n his perfect articulation is must for a debate that is worth listening.... N Frank superb always....
There can virtually be no Legal debates without satya prakash and sai Deepak....these men hv the potential to outflank anyone in debates
Conduct an exam like UPSC to judges who want to go for HC and SC and in interview they should be interviewed by Judges of either SC or HC then transparency will increase and everyone will get opportunity
These people will cry for transparency, same transparency is not needed in collegium.
Brilliant discussion
great discussion. I think there should be more time given to the programme. I could see Mr. Singh wasn't able to completely say about his opinion and had to be cut short because of the dearth of time. To have a proper good discussion there should be like 45 mins be given to each programmes.
Deep Rahul I agree with your valuable suggestion .And of course this is the one of the finest debate I ever watch at Big Picture .
Justice Singh's behaviour is the same as those Maharajas who lost their privy purse - sour and angry for losing something which was never supposed to be theirs. I wish the present government acts with an iron hand and tame the judiciary. You cannot allow the opaque system to run the system.
when even there is finger raising towards each others in the judiciary itself. Then its time to introduce some reforms in the Judiciary itself, nd it can't be stalled just by saying that ...
"it will endanger the independence of judiciary "
sai deepak what an excellent man
Not taking decision is also a decision
they could have also discussed "master of the roster" issue
How can anybody dislike this?
It was the collegium after listening to JSD & SP
Govt is the biggest litigant in the court. then how can they will be allowed to have a say in appointment of judges. if allow it will create conflict of interest between executive and judiciary
why nowadays constant glitches while broadcasting it seems like a controversy.
Judges supporting this to allow their sons and daughters to become, judges < something which is already happening in collegium sadly.
Every time, I hear about Indian Judicial system , it gives a vomiting sensation. When will this Media -bubble failed Judicial system end and begin providing justice to the common people for which they exist????People have lost faith in both the elites and the Judges who can't judge . It's like circus show.
10:16 thats the best way to rip apart 😂
Judiciary like our Constitution believed to be a sacred thing but amendment's and reforms will be the need of time to better sustain and progress of nation but it just keeps in mind that the Independence of judiciary is more or less like the Independence of Indian nation so it must be needed to keep it in views...
if leaders maintain that high standards ,then only ask to do.
J sai Deepak rocks
judges are known for their judgements. ..not by their appointments
App ka mann mai kon sa app log bola ra hu
Sai has a sound judgment.
in most cases govt is the party ,then how can govt say in the appointment.e.g latest one judge who quashes president rule not appointing to supreme court.so say of govt in appointment not good.
judiciary works in cilos...that the only problem that they work in cilos..for collegium system , no of selection committee members should be increased to large number than its having today for better transparency.
Deepanshu dwivedi *silos
yaa actuaally u r ryt...and thanks
first political reforms then judiciary reforms better
how we can trust prime minister&govt,if he is the obey the constitution how he can approve ordinary bill as a money bill.whatever the reason may, every organ of the constitution constitutional principles must obey at any cost .
mr.satya prakkash your taking some mischief in the judicial system and talking about and blaming but why can't take mischief in executive. so much MPs in govt threatening to constitution,social harmony , corrupt and taking hasty decisions.so present circumstances say in judiciary better for the people of india because these rules are finally for betterment of people .
hindi me bhi debate kijiye...hume bhi kuch samaj aye