i think this should be the standard for at least when ps5/Xsx are available on the store and not only for the bots. We are the majority here at the moment
After playing and hour or so on the PS5, you can definitely tell it was designed for older gen systems. It’s still a big upgrade from the first game. 60 fps makes it play way better.
I’m not interested in playing PS5 Dying Light 2 at 60 FPS 1080p…Far cry 6 and Ghost of Tsushima are both open world games and can play at 60 FPS 4K…such a disappointment
The industry underestimates the significance of the Cyberpunk episode and the importance of reviews like yours. I absolutely would not have bought DL2 until I saw something like this. Until I can get a hold of PS5, there will be no preorders for me. if outlets like yours chose not to do the last gen analysis, or choose to do them later, that is going to have a direct impact on when I would purchase a title if at all.
It's also good to know that the developers released a trailer exclusively showing off last generation footage of the game whereas cyberpunk 2077 seem to have used the best looking version.
@@exysa2798 It would be more worth while to point fingers at Cyber’s higher uppers/marketing team vs their dev team. The dev team I’m sure know how’s to make a game. The problem was CDPR’s heads that wanted this out before it was really done and somehow thought they could swing it, despite the dev team’s disagreement on readiness.
Dying Light doesn't seem well optimized for consoles. 1080p@60Hz for the PS5/XSX or only 1080p@30fps on a Xbox One X. The differences between the One S and PS4, One X and PS4 Pro and even the Series X and PS5 seem to be largely ignored.
there is barely any room for differences between PS5/XSX for what we've seen so far this gen. but for sure there was room for improvement for the others specially a 60fps mode for series S. It is basically giving a last generation experience here.
They were planning for 1440p at 60fps, but since the PS5 f’ed their plans, had to go down to 1080p just so both consoles would be the same and no crying - oh wait, kids on here are always doing that..
PS5 / Series X are grossly underutilized. I find unnacceptable that even at 1080 30fps they still couldn't even include the RT GI. RT shadows do nothing, it's a joke.
Looks like a port of last gen to current gen to me, theres things like loading times that could be much better on current gen, i wonder if eventually there will be some patches for current gen changing some things.
Loading on consoles was never slow because of Hdd or Sdd. I use a HDD on PC and load much faster than any console, the slower loading is due to how the game engines are programmed, how the console operating system is programmed, and how the ram and vram memory pools are shared, how the data buses work, and the speed of the CPU.
@@firstnamelastname-oy7es yes your right and they didnt optimize there engine to run on next gen, which is why theres room for improvement for this new gen.
At least it runs adequately on all systems, not a broken mess like some reason tragedies... I'm a PS5 owner but credit where credit is due. Get it on PC if you have the hardware
This game is obviously a last gen game that was not optimized to take advantage of the sereis x, ps5, and sereis s power that explains why the next gen version run so poorly.
@@Hopkins955 because it is only run at 1080p and this is the only game so far that the new console are running at 1080p even if there are much more demanding games out there .
The thing I don’t get is if it’s made for last gen and ported then why can’t these next gen systems run this shit easy at 4K60. I’m assuming the engine is outdated or something.
I wish they'd do dynamic resolution on all versions. There is a lot of unused potential when ps4 pro and one X get the same treatment (or ps4 and one S).
I think they did it on purpose because if they were to bump up the resolution on Xbox one x it would be close to ps5 1800p 30 resolution mode and they don't want that
The game has not used both the series X and the PS5 to its best imo. When you look at what other third party studios are able to accomplish with the next gen machines, tech land really fall behind on that front. Hopefully improvements are in line for the future.
Even last generation of consoles aren't being pushed or properly optimized Like the Xbox One X....Red Dead Redemption 2 looks way better then this game and run at higher resolutions.
It hasn't used any of the console particularly well except the base machines. It's pretty obvious they only focused on making it run well on the base consoles. One X and ps4 Pro are both the same despite the one X being more powerful. And also the series S version I'm playing on is pretty meh. I know they could get more out of that console and add in a 60fps mode with a lower resolution and settings. I bet things will improve down the line though as techland are pretty good at supporting the game.
@@JudeTheTH-camPoopersubscribe you're right there very well be a update later on down the line but with the cost of admission of $60 I would have hoped that they would have gotten this right from the beginning
@@Lavoss05 I only payed 30 for it because of just redeeming gift cards from Microsoft rewards so I'm not too bothered about playing at 1080p 30fps. But I know my console could do so much better.
It seems like the conservativeness and the leaving unused power on the table was done specifically to avoid a Cyperpunk situation. They played it extremely safe on current gen and last gen so as not to compromise performance. Would love to see them push it more with further updates. Also DF, this is your third video on this AAA long awaited next gen title with state of the art PC ray tracing. Not once have you mentioned it's missing HDR support on every single platform. That's bad form, imo. The lack of HDR in this day and age while being so focused on RT is concerning snd deserves discussion, but no outlets are talking about it, only angry consumers.
@@iHaveTheDocuments it really is and 1080p 60 for a performance mode on ps5 and series x is ridiculous especially after spending so many years on this game with the delays on top, it’s so disappointing!!!!
@Transistor Jump Next gen is capable of Dynamic 4k/60fps, and even 120fps at different resolutions, on certain titles. This game was announced before next gen consoles were launched, so most of the development time was spent for last gen consoles, and it still looks like sh*t. Truly, horribly optimised on every single platform. This kind of quality, or lack thereof, is unacceptable in 2022. They deserve some sort of flak for this. They're not worse than Cyberpunk, but they're on the same level, in terms of bugs and overall performance.
I’m looking forward to a resolution boost. Definitely looks way too blurry in current-gen “quality” mode. Resolution mode looks 🤌🏽, until you start moving.
I've been in so many forums with people calling me "dumb" for expecting 4K / 60fps quality games like *I'm the asshole* .. we've gotten numerous games running those stats
@@Boxxcutter right then they be like “get a pc” they don’t know how to have a correct argument and just say random shit I’m like that’s what Sony and Microsoft promote on their consoles like I don’t get it
The series S here is using the higher graphical options in this game as the series X and ps5. The one X is using the medium preset so in this game anyway the S wins.
Series s is being heavily under used. As are both other machines. In most games where its 900p or around there on base xbox one you get the same at 1440p or close to that on series S. Also one X version is a joke. Rdr2 has the same rendering resolution as this game on base xbox and then the one X version pushes all the way up to native 4k!!!. I hope they improve all console versions.
This is one of those time's I'm glad Devs designed a game for Older Gen, with how difficult it can be to get a current gen nowadays it's great to see Dying Light 2 preform well on Xbox One and PS4
@@Divinicus1er Most people still do. I live in Japan and the stores are doing lotteries, but their replenishment is so small and the number of ticket holders vastly exceeds that number each time. I've basically given up on getting a PS5 or Xbox X at this point. Now is a good time to catch up on my backlog, I suppose.
All i can hope for is that, in due time, they manage to improve performance and add a resolution scaler to the game as an option, cuz clearly some of the consoles have performance to spare.
The fact that I never hear my console(Ps5)is kinda bad IMO for a console. The console hasn’t been used to it’s absolute limit the entire time it’s existed. At least in my eyes.
@@knightslayer6161 that means nothing lol, it just means the air flow is great and providing good cooling, if it does get loud later on, you know to open it up and clean it
A lot of people feared old gen base systems wouldn't be up for the task. I'm thankful those worries are finally put to bed and that the game runs amazing with how much there's going on!
@@TheGravityShifter You didn't specify anything so I guess it's subjective, it's just when I read that something runs "amazing" then 864p and 30 fps is not what I imagine in 2022 but I guess it's better then Cyberpunk was which dropped below 20 fps quite often, but that's a pretty low bar. Either way as long as you enjoy the game it's fine, fun is all that matters in the end.
@@KillerKollar Yeah but ya gotta be fair with these ancient systems trying to run a game this big and complex. These are old systems and Techland isn't R* where they can spend close to a decade with around 2,000 devs from nine different studios on a single game. Cyberpunk is a different story. That game was just too big, and people have said they kinda prioritized PC too much when making the game, and it shows from what I can tell. As far as resolution goes for DL2 though, dynamic resolution would've likely worked but Techland chose a different approach so we'll just have to deal with it. If the picture is pretty but the game runs like crap, you're probably better off watching a slideshow or reading a picture book. So yeah, fun is what matters. It's a video game and that's what they are made for.
It runs ok, only complaints are pop in and charters get grey skin. sometimes audio cuts out, and the enemies ai doesn’t load sometimes so they will stand there well you hit them. Well they aren’t constantly they do happen very very often within my 3-4 hours of play. if you put on ice pack on top of your ps4 it helps quite a bit🤣, but it’s a pretty fun game still imo, but def needs a bit more work.
Very nice to see how the game holds up surprisingly well on last-gen but that somehow makes the performance profile on current gen even more dissapointing. This game could have used a few more months in the oven for a proper next-gen version on PS5/Xbox Series X, at least 60 fps performance on Series S, and all the while squashing the more serious bugs pretty much every reviewer came across. These days I feel like developers are damaging their reception of their game just to release it a few months early.
@@nick_4972 Those few more months could've given us more refined current gen console versions, and fixed some of the reported technical issues. It's a good game now overall, but with slightly more polish, it could have been better
Techland fucked up optimization. The fact they only managed 1080p in performance mode for next-gen consoles is a complete joke especially considering this isn't anything special graphically.
Considering how long ago the game was supposed to release, it was likely predominantly designed around previous gen. We need 3rd parties to start focusing on next gen and hiring port companies to make last gen versions.
You kids are delusionxl lol Ps5 version are entire different juggernaut compared to the Ps4 version The PS4 version can't even render the map it has to hide long distances.... Ps5 entire different tier Lmao
@@nguxurr9667 not selling games on the 110 millions ps4 and 50 millions Xbox ones is trowing money away, the cross generation titles aren’t going anywhere anytime soon
That's not how that works, if they do like you said. We will have a CP 2077 situation. Last gen have to be the baseline if you want it to work on it or don't sell on last gen annd lose a lot of money cuz everybody have them.
Sensible statement... if we were not in the middle of a pandemic that caused such a drastic ship shortage that getting a new-gen console or a high-end PC graphics card is absolutely impossible. Until this shortage ends, developers making concessions for previous-gen owners is a welcome attitude.
Started playing on Series X today and the game is fun but the graphics modes really disappointing. Started on performance mode and had to change to resolution because the image was so blurry on my 4K tv. Surely the current gen consoles can do better. Like i said i do really like the game so would have loved to play it in all its glory.
the game isnt optimized very well i tried to run it at 1440p with rt on my 6900xt and I was getting 30fps now I switched to rt off same res and ultra settings and I'm getting 90 fps so I'm not surprised that the current gen consoles did get the presets they got
After seeing this I'm convinced Techland put much more effort into the last-gen consoles than the current. I can only hope that Techland diligently works to improve current gen experiences. I've heard plenty of negative on the PC side too. But, I've also seen videos of lesser cards like the 6500XT turning in much better results than I ever would've expected (even w/o FSR). I'm betting in 6 months the current gen and PC versions will be greatly improved upon. Still sucks for early adopters. But, I can wait on this to improve, cost less, and be mostly patched up.
@@toptiertech7291 You really can't expect much more out of the last gen. You're looking at PS4's 1.84 Tflops and One S's 1.3 versus PS5's 10.3 and Series X's 12 Tflops. Not to mention the anemic Jaguar cpu cores. This could've easily been another Cyberpunk 2077. But, I think Techland did a good job on last gen. The real complaint should be 1080/60 in performance mode on current gen.
@@Doc_Valparaiso no. I can expect 1080/60 on PS4s because other games did it. This is a poorly optimized game. I get you’re a fan of the game but there’s no excuse for this poor of performance. The base PS4 ran Uncharted at 1080/60 without a hiccup. Call of duty did it no problem on those consoles in October. 900p and still going below 60fps is unacceptable in 2022
@@toptiertech7291 I haven't played DL2. Only the first one. That said, all games aren't created equal. Some are much more demanding on the hardware. Also, most games target 30fps on PS4. This is mainly because of the cpu consisting of 8 Jaguar cores clocked at 1.6ghz. The AMD Jaguar architecture was designed for low end mobile devices. Sony and MS cheaped out on their cpus. You also have to factor in that games and their respective engines are designed around/for increasingly powerful hardware. You brought up the recent COD. Most fps games do aim for 60fps (which on base PS4/XB1 dips below 60fps are almost always present). However, these specific FPS titles usually have much less granular detail, less animation, simpler textures, and overall are far less taxing. I get that you want a certain standard. Heck, when I bought my PS4 back in early 2014 I didn't know much about hardware at the time. I just thought this then new console could do everything a powerful PC could do. I got frustrated mid gen and bought a PC when games like Uncharted 4, God of War, and many more only targeted 30fps. If you think DL2 is bad on PS4 just take a look at the recommended PC requirements. You will see how far the PS4 punches above it's weight. No PC with a PS4's specs could run DL2. I also use PC as a metric because last and current gen consoles are X86 64-bit machines which utilize PC architecture. Gone are the days of the PS2's emotion engine and the PS3's cell processor. Modern consoles are much more boring from a tech perspective. But, it does make them infinitely easier to make games for. My advice to you is if you want all games to play at a locked 60fps at a 1080p minimum is to go for a current gen console or a PC that will meet your preferred specs. The messed up market doesn't make this a cheap or easy proposition. But, it can be done. Especially if your aim is a PC and you don't mind buying prebuilt, getting a used graphics card (however AMD's 6600 and 6600XT's new are closest to normal in price and perform great at 1080p), or waiting for the market to stabilize. I know this is a long post. I'm not trying to talk down to you either. You just need to know that the PS4 is old now. That it's only going to have a harder time running the latest games at your preferred quality. It sucks seeing your tech investments become obsolete. Especially if you paid $400 for a PS4 around launch like I did. I had to come to terms with it myself. DL2 is very demanding on every platform. I was not happy at all to see it running at 1080/60 on PS5 either. Better preforming hardware is always around the corner. And, even a shiny new RTX 3090 will eventually have an expiration date. I know my current PC or PS5 will one day become obsolete. ...Best of luck to you man.
Do not buy this game on last-gen. After 200+ hours on a ps4 slim i have noticed a lot. Frame rate constantly takes a dip, resolution is 720p, bugs galore both immersion breaking and gamebreaking, textures not loading, numerous audio bugs, numerous AI glitches and a whole lot more. This game was NOT built for last-gen, and it very much is a repeat of Cyberpunk. Don't buy it, save your money.
Dude, I'm still on PS4 Slim, I would love to have a PS4 Pro so I can play games like Genshin Impact and Okami HD and in native 4K or games like New Super Lucky Tales and Shadow of the Colossus at 60fps. Even Fortnite has much better graphics ( like draw-distance, shadow quality and texture quality ) on PS4 Pro compared to PS4 Slim.
Great video! I have a beast of a PC but want to play with friends and my X box is seriously outdated (and this isn’t cross platform for some reason) so I wanted to see how much it a hit I was taking for my buddies. Excellent video as always! Thanks a lot
They focused more on the last gen versions to avoid replicating another Cyberpunk disaster. That said they’ve seriously neglected next gen versions, running at 1080 optimized for the Series X??? Absolutely ridiculous!!!!
These new consoles are roughly equal to 2070 super and you get like 40 fps at 1440p with that card so it all make sense why they locked it to 1080p 60 fps.
This might run fine at 30 fps on all systems but the blurry resolution and last gen visuals on the PS5 and Xbox Series X are a real disappointment. None of the modes on the new systems offer everything. You can have a higher resolution than 1080p but only at 30 fps. You can have 60 fps but only at 1080p. You can have ray-tracing but only at 1080p and 30 fps. After playing games like Spider-Mam: Miles Morales and Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart that offer 1080p+, 60 fps *and* ray-tracing it is hard not to feel let down by this game. There's a real sense that the developers have just opted for the lowest resolution to guarantee the most stable performance, which sounds great in theory, but in practice it comes across as underwhelming considering how much more powerful the current gen systems are over the older systems in terms of CPU and GPU performance. Why didn't they use dynamic resolution scaling to maximise the capabilities of the new systems, especially the Xbox Series X with its VRR support? Even the loading times on PS5 and Xbox Series S|/X are seriously lacking. It really seems like the developers did not optimise the game fully for each system but instead targetted very safe settings. You would think that by targetting the oldest hardware, the base Xbox One S and PS4, that the game would scale up better than this for the new systems but, sadly, not. The PC version looks better but only because it adds realistic global illumination but to use that you have to spend much, much more than the cost of a next-gen console to enjoy it in all its glory and then you have to use 'tricks' like DLSS to get decent performance with RT on. There's no running this game natively at 60 fps and 4K even on a £2,500 GTX 3090 graphics card.
What an idiotic take Spider man and ratchet and clank are EXCLUSIVES, not a multi platforms they had to work on 1-3 consoles techland had to work on 8! platforms, see the difference
AC Valhalla , Far cry 6 are an example of how a well optimized games can be made . Watch dogs legions had only quality mode when launched but later ubisoft added performance mode to run at 1440 @ 60 fps and at that time exactly i bought it . Most of us got new gen consoles to get new gen gaming experience .
Nice to see the game still looks pretty good on last gen systems. I feel like I've been waiting 5 years for this game to come out, and I didn't want to have to wait to play it till the new consoles become available.
I wonder how the one X would perform with a modern CPU, the GPU side is a great feat by Microsoft, shame they had to stick with the jaguar cores for better compatibility back in 2017
The GPU in the Xbox One X is equivalent to a RX 580, the Series S in rasterization performance is equivalent to a GTX 1650 Super, PS5 a RTX 2060 Super and Series X a RTX 2070. With a better CPU like a Ryzen 7 1800x the games on the Xbox One X would have run at 1440p upscaled to 4K at 60fps with graphics settings equivalent to low and medium quality textures. The GPU in the Xbox One X was a entry level Polaris GPU paired with a CPU weaker than a second generation Intel Core I5 CPU.
The PS5 and Series X really got the shaft with this game it seems. Hardly takes advantage of the better specs and definitely doesn’t utilize the SSD tech of both machines either. Really disappointing.
Honestly I think this engine itself is largely unoptimized. The fact that PS5 and Series X have to drop to 1080p to run at 60fps says enough...and the series s being locked to 30 is honestly sad...and the lack of HDR support is disappointing
@@derekobrien-wood9530 it’s not the consoles. You do realize this game isn’t fully optimized especially when we have other next gen games running at 1440p 60 frames and some 1080 120 frames.
Only thing with this video is that he keeps using the One S as the base xbox one. The base Xbox one has 1.31 tera flops whereas the S has 1.4. Its not a major difference but it could mean 2-3 extra frames. It S also has a better HDMI port for better cables soo nit sure why the S is used as the base but the base PS4 is used... As the base. Yeah 🤔
This is exactly the review I was looking for before I bought Dying Light 2 for my Xbox One. While I’m looking forward to getting a Series X and playing it there, I’m glad I’ll be able to enjoy this in the meantime.
Techland decided that the performance mode on PS5 and Xbox Series X is a locked 1080p 60FPS. It's burry on the LG CX because its literately 1/4th the pixels blown up to fit a 55 inch TV that's why checkerboard 4K or dynamic 4K exists.
I am so happy about its performance on the base PS4, I didnt know it was on that until right now, and I was upset I couldn't play it without the switch cloud version due to my PC being a bit out of date and not up to parr to play Dying Light 2, but now I don't have to worry, because now there is a good, solid PS4 version I can play instead
I wish you’d stop bigging up the ray tracing in quality mode on the next gen consoles because it looks absolutely horrid. This game doesn’t even have HDR which is totally unacceptable.
Even if the game didn't implement HDR. Consoles would still convert the SDR picture to an HDR one. I know with Windows 11 the moment the gane startup. Windows Auto HDR which is based of Series X kicks in.
Optimization should’ve been the NUMBER ONE thing on their checklist. This game ride or dies on the frames per second, because the movement and combat is always moving at a very fast pace. 30fps should’ve been a BIG NO in development. No 4K60 or HDR. Disappointed.
There is only so much you can "optimize." You get to a point where it no longer does anything and what holds it back is computational power. Better hardware is needed. The last-gen consoles are so outdated at this point. Optimization would not make DL2 perform better because the graphical power of last-gen is just not there anymore. The lower quality graphics settings for the last-gen consoles is the "optimization" and I don't think there is much Techland can do. There might be some things they can squeeze out of the engine, but I don't expect it to make much difference.
Very lazy job from the developer. The game should've been running: OneS: 900p30 PS4: 1080p30 PS4Pro: 1440p30 OneX: 1600p30 PS5/XSX: 2160p30 1440p60 1440p30 RT But it doesn't try to reach those numbers. What a half assed job from the developers and such a disappointment. Do not support lazy tactics like this - we deserve better than playing 1080p on current gen machines.
@@nathanael3949 Pelo que joguei sim, tirando alguns bugs, o jogo ta bonito, pelo menos pra quem nao liga para algo de ponta, ainda mais sendo gratis na 9.00 com jailbreak.
Its kind of hard to do with the vram difference if 3gb vram is not enough. Example a 780ti has 3gb while ps4 has 8gb. A gtx 1060 is close to 780ti and has 6gb vram. Also a rx480 (8gb) Then when it comes to CPU you need 8 core CPU something Intel didn't launch until 2018 especially important with DRM pc has to deal with. Then hopefully you can copy console settings exactly a lot of games tend to have certain graphic settings lower on console than the lowest possible on PC. Then there is dynamic resolution(this game has FSR though so that will be possible here)
And the people saying ubisoft games are badly optimized At least they can do 4k 60fps on xbsx or 4k 30fps on xb1x Not 1080p 60fps on xbsx or 1080p 30fps on xb1x
Series S really isn't a powerful machine AT ALL. what do you think is going to happen when truly new gen games come out? 🤔 this is built for 8 year old systems and series S still taking huge hits. Honestly the series S is really only good for higher framerate multiplayer games in low resolution. So basically it can still be a console for competitive gaming at low res but anything else is going to take huge hits. And even then there will be a bunch of multiplayer games that it won't run at 120fps when new gen only games come out. But at least for last gen competitive games it's doing allright if your ok with lower resolution. But I'd say that's really all it's good for.
@@sneakkyz3696 rubbish. If an xbox studio created the game it would definitively run 60fps. After Buying Activision series s will be the 60fps Standard!
I m so disappointed with PS5/XS performances, i will wait and hopefully for a patch before buying it. Glad some people are enjoying it anyway, but for me it is an hard pass
Yep same here. It’s a no go for me unless they improve performance. If this game gets a 40K/60 upgrade and fixes a lot of the issues is has I’m definitely buying it.
Agreed. That made me skeptical and then I hear the game is broken and a lot of reviewers said the story sucks and none of the characters are memorable. People on Reddit said the combat isn’t as good as the first. If they update the game to do 4K60 I’ll get it.
@Oliver yours comparison is the best !!! always you say what graphics is on consoles vs pc etc. Great Job, that's we needed more technical less other ! :) now I know that performance and res mode on ps5 use high setting pc, differences is only on resolution and fps, so I chose performance on my oled a84j image is almost as sharp like on res mode, because sony XR processing in tv is on, and I. get 60 fps !
They made the right priority I would say to be able to release on time. Prioritize the FPS and playability. If they can push out better TAA or Dynamic resolution in future patches, that will be icing on the cake. This is much smarter way of doing things under time constraint then to release the game with huge performance issues like Cyberpunk. Most players only care about two things. 1. Is it fun? 2. Its not stuttering or crashing. I remember when RDR2 come out and reviews were complaining about the visuals on Xbox One S, and literally the same week one of my friends visited and jut played it on his Xbox One S and commented that it was the best looking game he ever tried.
Nice stuff DF. I had no worries that Dying Light 2 would Run well and Look ok on the Older Systems, i am so happy that people who are still Playing on the Older Consoles, can have a decent Playthrough of Dying Light 2.
Impossible thanks to the jaguar cpu. Besides a handful of games the last gen consoles were 30fps thanks to the cpu not being very good for above 30fps. Its a better idea to crank up resolution and settings if possible on one x.
@@darkwolf1739 DL2 runs 40-60 fps on old ass 4 core cpu like i5 2400 or almost rock solid 60 on i3 9100f. Jaguar can handle it, but devs are afeaid that it will be unstable+tearing and every consoleboy journalist will whine about it even tho it’s much better that 30fps
Interesting watch and it helped confirm a few suspicions I had about the game while playing it on a base PlayStation 4. Funny thing is that looking at it, I get this "Switch port" vibe. When you look at how the heavy hitters from the Xbox One and PlayStation 4 got ported to the Nintendo Switch and the sacrifices that were made to get it to run well enough on there, feels kind of the same when looking at the base systems, with the enhanced systems being more of the targeted platform. Hopefully during the game's support they'll try and edge out some extra visual improvements to give a cleaner look to the base consoles, then give the enhanced and current gen systems an improvement to better flex their muscles (PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series systems in particular). Overall though, massive improvement compared to what we got with Cyberpunk 2077 and Watch_Dogs: Legion (the former in particular) as they game has been pretty smooth (well, as smooth as 30fps gets) with minimal pop in issues. See some from time to time, but no where near as bad as the pop ins from Cyberpunk 2077.
I’m glad that Techland decided to target and optimize for last gen consoles, since that’s where most console gamers are stuck. The downside is that the new gen console versions are kneecapped. Can’t wait for this cross-gen period to end.
I wonder how long it will take. Looks like we need another 2 years for games to be released only on PS5 and new Xbox + PC :( = no true next gen games yet
@@K0xm4N and that's why Sony is winning cause you can play ps5 only games right now ratchet and clank rift apart, returnal, demons souls, etc etc but yea even their best upcoming games like horizon and gow will suffer due to being last gen too but they'll be much higher quality than this unoptimized disappointment
@@ShakeNbake9106 I like the etc etc, man , thePS5 has almost no real exclusives like the series X/S doesn't have any real exclusives :P not saying they're not winning in sales, but the ps5 is far from worth it at this time imo, the three you gave right now are the only three I can think of that didn't release cross gen, correct me if I'm wrong and there's anything else worthwhile, I'll add it to my list for when the PS5 Pro releases :D
@Transistor Jump i agree completely though you would assume that with the development time they had, they could and or shouldve optimised it for current gen. Maybe we might get an update with said optimization but i highly doubt. Something like a PS5 mode with 1440P res/60FPS and some form of ray tracing like metro has done.
@Transistor Jump Maybe towards half of the current gen cycle, even though i would love to see it this year or next year. It kinda makes you wonder what the next generational leap will look like in the future. I mean i guess 4K with ray traced global illumination and ray traced reflections in 60FPS.
@@outbobthelaw2248 this "2022 title" looks much worse that the first Dying Light. Just a terrible work from developers. Jeez, Fallout 76 looks better than this game.
This game is last gen to the brim. 7 years in development... Many delays.... That's what we get. Even on PC the game isn't performing well enough. Great job, Techland..
@@dmw7900 Goodness, "PC Master Race" kid, you must have a special 3070, more special than Digital Foundry's RTX3090, as that's where I got that information. Their own PC performance review.
I honestly am disappointed with the series x version and PS5 version. My son plays on a Xbox one x and it looks lost as good as my series x on resolution mode.. there is more than enough power to have a 4k 60 medium preset setting on series x and I hate that techland isn't taking advantage of the power
@@IghorMaia lmao yes there is..... If my 3070 can run this game at 4k 60 there is more than enough power in the series x and PS5 to push these games to a good 4k 30 with Ray tracing or 4k 60 without but with higher texture resolution. The specs of these consoles unless they are lying puts in about the same range as my PC. Plus other games are doing it just fine. They programmed for last gen and did a lazy resolution update for the next gen consoles and called it the next gen versions. Sorry but that's not how this should work.
Resolution is a bit low and everyone seems to mock them for that. But honestly, someone made the right decission and almost every system is very stable.
Can't wait to buy this on pc.. I'm Really impressed with last gen implementation here tho. I really didn't think it was going to pull it off as well as it apparently did.
This doesn't even run at 1080p. Literally any of the PS exclusives look better than this: HZD, Ghost of Tsushima, GoW, TLoU2, etc. Even Uncharted 4, a 6+ year old game looks better than this. I know, 3rd person vs 1st person and all. In that case, Killzone Shadow Fall, one of the first titles on PS4, looks so much better than this, and even runs at 1080p. Honestly, DL2 is one of the worst optimised games, on every platform. Last gen doesn't even get 1080p, it looks like 720p at times, blurry as hell. Current gen only has one mode with 60fps, ie - 1080p/60fps. And, the game is incredibly demanding even on high end PCs, plus there's Denuvo. Most Streamers and TH-camrs don't have performance issues because they have the best equipment, it's literally their job. I love DL1, but Techland screwed up this release; with multiple delays, narrative rewrites, and working through the pandemic, something had to go wrong. I'm very disappointed in them, they also snuck in Denuvo on the PC version 2 days before launch. While the inclusion of Denuvo is fine for anti-piracy reasons, it's widely known to affect performance. But, sneaking it in 2 days before launch, when all the pre-orders are already in, that's very shady.
Horizon Zero Dawn looks better than this and it’s 5 years old. lol. Same for God of War which was 3 years ago. This does look solid though on last gen, but damn it’s 2022 I expect it to look good.
@@nathanael3949 carious what if they take PS4 pro version (1080p/medium sittings) And put on Xbox series s (much better CPU and GPU and a SSD) Could then series s run the game at 60 fps instead of 30fps?
I don't even play these games on my Series S let alone a last gen console (don't have one anymore)... But I love watching this kind of content, plus it's nice to know cross gen games aren't as bad as they were when it was Xbox 360 to Xbox One, I remember trying to play the few I tried being horrid (looking at you GTA 5, so happy I was mostly into pc gaming anyway, was a shitty time for console).
I'm just here to see if we had another Cyberpunk debacle on our hands and if I needed to avoid Dying Light as a last gen user. Thanks for answering that question in the video!
Wow, great port overall! They'd just need to sync the screen tear to the bottom/ top of the screen and i'd say that's a perfectly serviceable experience.
@@optimusprime7491 most games on console that have dynamic vsync locks the tear to a fixed point in the screen usually at the bottom on the last 30 pixels or so... you can also do that on pc using msi afterburner
![SAFEPLANET - ดาวเคราะห์ [ THE PLANET ]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/4X1XL3I_k3c/mqdefault.jpg)
So happy you guys are still letting us know how the last gen machines run the new games. Thank you.
i think this should be the standard for at least when ps5/Xsx are available on the store and not only for the bots.
We are the majority here at the moment
@@Reloreee The same for PC. I've been waiting for a graphics card for almost 2 years .
Spoiler alert - run like shit
To be fair, the last gen consoles are still the most owned gaming consoles since fuck all people can get their hands on ps5's and shit
++ i was literally waiting for this video
After playing and hour or so on the PS5, you can definitely tell it was designed for older gen systems. It’s still a big upgrade from the first game. 60 fps makes it play way better.
Dying light 2 runs much better than 1 on og xbox one.
@@neliz8 It’s definitely a big improvement from the first game.
Quit dilly dallying, Kratos. You got Ragnarok to worry about, not the zombie apocalypse.
Quality mode is not playable on my ps5. Frame stutters.
I’m not interested in playing PS5 Dying Light 2 at 60 FPS 1080p…Far cry 6 and Ghost of Tsushima are both open world games and can play at 60 FPS 4K…such a disappointment
thank you for not leaving out us last gen users🙏
The main console population...PS4 and XONE !
Most people still use last gen consoles,the availability of ps5/series X is low
I'm still using my One X !
@@emperor719 got both
Y’all broke
Been playing on a PS4 Slim, and I’m having a lot of fun. Pretty solid framerate. The resolution is a bit low, but all in all the experience is there.
Abit low... It's a blurry mess. Stop lying.
@@AJ-xv7oh That's ok-ish on 1080p screen. And for a hardware this old, that's pretty impressive.
@@AJ-xv7oh would you rather play in 480p with less blur I bet not would you want to play it in 720p with better graphics probably so.
@@Prowerexem 480p with less blur than 720p¿
@@mariusztrynkiewicz4862 okay I would have 720p better ailising and less blur
The industry underestimates the significance of the Cyberpunk episode and the importance of reviews like yours. I absolutely would not have bought DL2 until I saw something like this. Until I can get a hold of PS5, there will be no preorders for me. if outlets like yours chose not to do the last gen analysis, or choose to do them later, that is going to have a direct impact on when I would purchase a title if at all.
Agreed
Cyberpunk 2077 was made by inexperienced amateurs.
No pre-orders until you get a PS5 ? You should never, ever pre-order no matter what game, or what platform.
It's also good to know that the developers released a trailer exclusively showing off last generation footage of the game whereas cyberpunk 2077 seem to have used the best looking version.
@@exysa2798 It would be more worth while to point fingers at Cyber’s higher uppers/marketing team vs their dev team. The dev team I’m sure know how’s to make a game. The problem was CDPR’s heads that wanted this out before it was really done and somehow thought they could swing it, despite the dev team’s disagreement on readiness.
Dying Light doesn't seem well optimized for consoles. 1080p@60Hz for the PS5/XSX or only 1080p@30fps on a Xbox One X. The differences between the One S and PS4, One X and PS4 Pro and even the Series X and PS5 seem to be largely ignored.
well Series X runs at a slightly higher resolution than PS5 curiously. but they didn't bother giving One X visual improvements over PS4 Pro.
there is barely any room for differences between PS5/XSX for what we've seen so far this gen. but for sure there was room for improvement for the others specially a 60fps mode for series S. It is basically giving a last generation experience here.
@@JaimeIsJaime The series S runs at higher visual settings than last gen consoles, But even then it's not noticable enough.
They were planning for 1440p at 60fps, but since the PS5 f’ed their plans, had to go down to 1080p just so both consoles would be the same and no crying - oh wait, kids on here are always doing that..
@@Brahcraft now say the same without sounding like a fanboy
PS5 / Series X are grossly underutilized. I find unnacceptable that even at 1080 30fps they still couldn't even include the RT GI. RT shadows do nothing, it's a joke.
Next gen at 1080p, 30fps. Yeah I'd be pissed off too.
Looks like a port of last gen to current gen to me, theres things like loading times that could be much better on current gen, i wonder if eventually there will be some patches for current gen changing some things.
Loading on consoles was never slow because of Hdd or Sdd. I use a HDD on PC and load much faster than any console, the slower loading is due to how the game engines are programmed, how the console operating system is programmed, and how the ram and vram memory pools are shared, how the data buses work, and the speed of the CPU.
@@firstnamelastname-oy7es yes your right and they didnt optimize there engine to run on next gen, which is why theres room for improvement for this new gen.
At least it runs adequately on all systems, not a broken mess like some reason tragedies... I'm a PS5 owner but credit where credit is due. Get it on PC if you have the hardware
@@firstnamelastname-oy7es no pc currently loads faster than a console currently
This game is obviously a last gen game that was not optimized to take advantage of the sereis x, ps5, and sereis s power that explains why the next gen version run so poorly.
Why does it run poorly? It holds steady 30 Fps in quality and 60 in performance mode.
@@Hopkins955 because it is only run at 1080p and this is the only game so far that the new console are running at 1080p even if there are much more demanding games out there .
The thing I don’t get is if it’s made for last gen and ported then why can’t these next gen systems run this shit easy at 4K60. I’m assuming the engine is outdated or something.
@@Omar-kl3xp guardians of the galaxy is 1080p 60
@@Omar-kl3xp I see and yes the resolution could be higher in performance mode indeed but they already said on Twitter that they are looking into it.
I wish they'd do dynamic resolution on all versions. There is a lot of unused potential when ps4 pro and one X get the same treatment (or ps4 and one S).
I’d expect both DSR and AMD’s FSR to be added in the not too distant future :)
It still looks good regardless
I think they did it on purpose because if they were to bump up the resolution on Xbox one x it would be close to ps5 1800p 30 resolution mode and they don't want that
They are on medium pc settings pro and 1x next gen high settings digital foundary sed
@@Tobi-sr6ju No, optimising for a console takes time and money, and one X is not that widespread so they put the ps4 pro version on it. That it
The game has not used both the series X and the PS5 to its best imo. When you look at what other third party studios are able to accomplish with the next gen machines, tech land really fall behind on that front. Hopefully improvements are in line for the future.
Even last generation of consoles aren't being pushed or properly optimized Like the Xbox One X....Red Dead Redemption 2 looks way better then this game and run at higher resolutions.
It is kind of ironic that their name is Techland given the lack of technical performance
It hasn't used any of the console particularly well except the base machines. It's pretty obvious they only focused on making it run well on the base consoles. One X and ps4 Pro are both the same despite the one X being more powerful. And also the series S version I'm playing on is pretty meh. I know they could get more out of that console and add in a 60fps mode with a lower resolution and settings. I bet things will improve down the line though as techland are pretty good at supporting the game.
@@JudeTheTH-camPoopersubscribe you're right there very well be a update later on down the line but with the cost of admission of $60 I would have hoped that they would have gotten this right from the beginning
@@Lavoss05 I only payed 30 for it because of just redeeming gift cards from Microsoft rewards so I'm not too bothered about playing at 1080p 30fps. But I know my console could do so much better.
It seems like the conservativeness and the leaving unused power on the table was done specifically to avoid a Cyperpunk situation.
They played it extremely safe on current gen and last gen so as not to compromise performance.
Would love to see them push it more with further updates.
Also DF, this is your third video on this AAA long awaited next gen title with state of the art PC ray tracing.
Not once have you mentioned it's missing HDR support on every single platform.
That's bad form, imo.
The lack of HDR in this day and age while being so focused on RT is concerning snd deserves discussion, but no outlets are talking about it, only angry consumers.
Exactly, there is no way that this game cannot hit 1440p checkerboarded to 4k 60fps on ps5
It's pathetic how badly it's optimized.
@@iHaveTheDocuments it really is and 1080p 60 for a performance mode on ps5 and series x is ridiculous especially after spending so many years on this game with the delays on top, it’s so disappointing!!!!
AAA? With their experitse seems like a AA game with some extra polish in the oven, which is a good thing.
@Transistor Jump Next gen is capable of Dynamic 4k/60fps, and even 120fps at different resolutions, on certain titles. This game was announced before next gen consoles were launched, so most of the development time was spent for last gen consoles, and it still looks like sh*t. Truly, horribly optimised on every single platform. This kind of quality, or lack thereof, is unacceptable in 2022. They deserve some sort of flak for this. They're not worse than Cyberpunk, but they're on the same level, in terms of bugs and overall performance.
I’m looking forward to a resolution boost. Definitely looks way too blurry in current-gen “quality” mode. Resolution mode looks 🤌🏽, until you start moving.
That the taa not the resolution.
I've been in so many forums with people calling me "dumb" for expecting 4K / 60fps quality games like *I'm the asshole* .. we've gotten numerous games running those stats
@@Boxxcutter right then they be like “get a pc” they don’t know how to have a correct argument and just say random shit I’m like that’s what Sony and Microsoft promote on their consoles like I don’t get it
@@namelessalias0007 yeah the TAA is pretty ass here, i disabled it from the config file and it unironically looks better now
The TAA is really bad on this game.
This seems like a good one to compare Series S with PS4 Pro and One X, given the same output resolution.
Graphics on PS2 level. Sad
But series s isn’t competing with those that’s what u people never understand lmao
@@mal-avcisi9783 You've never played a PS2 game if you think that this looks like one.
The series S here is using the higher graphical options in this game as the series X and ps5. The one X is using the medium preset so in this game anyway the S wins.
The Series S has higher graphical detail and of course the super fast load times that both PS5 and Xbox Series X have.
I actually expected some heavy performance drops. I am positively surprised!
Hopefully we get some optimization... Looks like last gen game should be performing better and even better on next gen consoles...
Especially on the Series S, I think they just got lazy on that version.
Series s is being heavily under used. As are both other machines. In most games where its 900p or around there on base xbox one you get the same at 1440p or close to that on series S. Also one X version is a joke. Rdr2 has the same rendering resolution as this game on base xbox and then the one X version pushes all the way up to native 4k!!!. I hope they improve all console versions.
@@BruhHowDidIGetHere they just played it safe with last-gen so it won't be another cyberpunk, I hope that they'll fix it with patches
This is one of those time's I'm glad Devs designed a game for Older Gen, with how difficult it can be to get a current gen nowadays it's great to see Dying Light 2 preform well on Xbox One and PS4
I don't know much about the technicality behind it all but as long it runs and preforms well, I'm happy 🙂
You still have issues to buy a new gen console?
It doesnt run well on old gen... lol hit a zombie the zombie will freeze for 3 sec
@@Divinicus1er Most people still do. I live in Japan and the stores are doing lotteries, but their replenishment is so small and the number of ticket holders vastly exceeds that number each time. I've basically given up on getting a PS5 or Xbox X at this point. Now is a good time to catch up on my backlog, I suppose.
@@Divinicus1er yes
All i can hope for is that, in due time, they manage to improve performance and add a resolution scaler to the game as an option, cuz clearly some of the consoles have performance to spare.
The fact that I never hear my console(Ps5)is kinda bad IMO for a console. The console hasn’t been used to it’s absolute limit the entire time it’s existed. At least in my eyes.
@@knightslayer6161 wants to hear that hemi
@@knightslayer6161 that means nothing lol, it just means the air flow is great and providing good cooling, if it does get loud later on, you know to open it up and clean it
@@CoCo.-_- well mine is clean. Stays clean. Opened it after a year. Barely dust
@@knightslayer6161 Good, you take good care of your quiet console 👍
A lot of people feared old gen base systems wouldn't be up for the task. I'm thankful those worries are finally put to bed and that the game runs amazing with how much there's going on!
I wouldn't call 864p "amazing" but I guess if you play on a 1080p screen it's acceptable
@@KillerKollar I was speaking in general. At no point did I specify resolution.
@@TheGravityShifter You didn't specify anything so I guess it's subjective, it's just when I read that something runs "amazing" then 864p and 30 fps is not what I imagine in 2022 but I guess it's better then Cyberpunk was which dropped below 20 fps quite often, but that's a pretty low bar. Either way as long as you enjoy the game it's fine, fun is all that matters in the end.
@@KillerKollar Yeah but ya gotta be fair with these ancient systems trying to run a game this big and complex. These are old systems and Techland isn't R* where they can spend close to a decade with around 2,000 devs from nine different studios on a single game.
Cyberpunk is a different story. That game was just too big, and people have said they kinda prioritized PC too much when making the game, and it shows from what I can tell.
As far as resolution goes for DL2 though, dynamic resolution would've likely worked but Techland chose a different approach so we'll just have to deal with it. If the picture is pretty but the game runs like crap, you're probably better off watching a slideshow or reading a picture book. So yeah, fun is what matters. It's a video game and that's what they are made for.
It runs ok, only complaints are pop in and charters get grey skin. sometimes audio cuts out, and the enemies ai doesn’t load sometimes so they will stand there well you hit them. Well they aren’t constantly they do happen very very often within my 3-4 hours of play. if you put on ice pack on top of your ps4 it helps quite a bit🤣, but it’s a pretty fun game still imo, but def needs a bit more work.
Very nice to see how the game holds up surprisingly well on last-gen but that somehow makes the performance profile on current gen even more dissapointing.
This game could have used a few more months in the oven for a proper next-gen version on PS5/Xbox Series X, at least 60 fps performance on Series S, and all the while squashing the more serious bugs pretty much every reviewer came across. These days I feel like developers are damaging their reception of their game just to release it a few months early.
It was already in development for 7 years. What's another few months?
would rather play it now 🤷
@@nick_4972 Those few more months could've given us more refined current gen console versions, and fixed some of the reported technical issues. It's a good game now overall, but with slightly more polish, it could have been better
@@nick_4972 Exactly. 7 years is very long development cycle to go through only to release the game in an unpolished state.
@@weaverquest dude you get stable 30fps, what the hell else do you want from a 2013 hardware? Thank them it's not Cyberbug like release, geez
Techland fucked up optimization. The fact they only managed 1080p in performance mode for next-gen consoles is a complete joke especially considering this isn't anything special graphically.
I decided and said fuck it and played in ray tracing mode and it looks better than the other 2 on monitor at least
"This isn't anything special graphically"... Name me a cross-gen game that has such vastly better graphics?
@@nonyabusiness6084 id say forza i think
@@nonyabusiness6084 even far cry 6 looks better than this imo
@Lov Mir PC has also bad performance, you can’t get a stable 60FPS@4K without upscaling even on a 3080. And that’s without raytracing.
Good video Oliver. Your presentation has improved alot. Keep it up.
It's not detailed enough.
It's good but seems a bit messy overall
Patronising
@@Rebelscum264 It wasn't patronising it was supportive you are just out to argue with others for attention
Considering how long ago the game was supposed to release, it was likely predominantly designed around previous gen. We need 3rd parties to start focusing on next gen and hiring port companies to make last gen versions.
You kids are delusionxl lol
Ps5 version are entire different juggernaut compared to the Ps4 version
The PS4 version can't even render the map it has to hide long distances.... Ps5 entire different tier Lmao
@@nguxurr9667 not selling games on the 110 millions ps4 and 50 millions Xbox ones is trowing money away, the cross generation titles aren’t going anywhere anytime soon
Unlike Cyberpunk fortunately
That's not how that works, if they do like you said. We will have a CP 2077 situation. Last gen have to be the baseline if you want it to work on it or don't sell on last gen annd lose a lot of money cuz everybody have them.
Sensible statement... if we were not in the middle of a pandemic that caused such a drastic ship shortage that getting a new-gen console or a high-end PC graphics card is absolutely impossible. Until this shortage ends, developers making concessions for previous-gen owners is a welcome attitude.
Started playing on Series X today and the game is fun but the graphics modes really disappointing. Started on performance mode and had to change to resolution because the image was so blurry on my 4K tv. Surely the current gen consoles can do better. Like i said i do really like the game so would have loved to play it in all its glory.
I was worried about this. As I game on an lg oled tv. Bums me out to know that the 1080p is gonna look blurry
Crappy optimization
the game isnt optimized very well i tried to run it at 1440p with rt on my 6900xt and I was getting 30fps now I switched to rt off same res and ultra settings and I'm getting 90 fps
so I'm not surprised that the current gen consoles did get the presets they got
I know right 1080p on current gen is mind blowing XD
optimization is shit on xbox. This title was in development hell for many years and it shows across the board.
Kudos to team for creating a good base game and scaling it up from there.
After seeing this I'm convinced Techland put much more effort into the last-gen consoles than the current. I can only hope that Techland diligently works to improve current gen experiences.
I've heard plenty of negative on the PC side too. But, I've also seen videos of lesser cards like the 6500XT turning in much better results than I ever would've expected (even w/o FSR).
I'm betting in 6 months the current gen and PC versions will be greatly improved upon. Still sucks for early adopters. But, I can wait on this to improve, cost less, and be mostly patched up.
Every game takes time to get patched, but at least on pc you can get much better options for self optimization right out of the gate.
I mean the last gen titles run under 1080p in 2022. That is awful
@@toptiertech7291 You really can't expect much more out of the last gen. You're looking at PS4's 1.84 Tflops and One S's 1.3 versus PS5's 10.3 and Series X's 12 Tflops. Not to mention the anemic Jaguar cpu cores. This could've easily been another Cyberpunk 2077. But, I think Techland did a good job on last gen. The real complaint should be 1080/60 in performance mode on current gen.
@@Doc_Valparaiso no. I can expect 1080/60 on PS4s because other games did it. This is a poorly optimized game. I get you’re a fan of the game but there’s no excuse for this poor of performance. The base PS4 ran Uncharted at 1080/60 without a hiccup. Call of duty did it no problem on those consoles in October. 900p and still going below 60fps is unacceptable in 2022
@@toptiertech7291 I haven't played DL2. Only the first one. That said, all games aren't created equal. Some are much more demanding on the hardware. Also, most games target 30fps on PS4. This is mainly because of the cpu consisting of 8 Jaguar cores clocked at 1.6ghz. The AMD Jaguar architecture was designed for low end mobile devices. Sony and MS cheaped out on their cpus. You also have to factor in that games and their respective engines are designed around/for increasingly powerful hardware. You brought up the recent COD. Most fps games do aim for 60fps (which on base PS4/XB1 dips below 60fps are almost always present). However, these specific FPS titles usually have much less granular detail, less animation, simpler textures, and overall are far less taxing. I get that you want a certain standard. Heck, when I bought my PS4 back in early 2014 I didn't know much about hardware at the time. I just thought this then new console could do everything a powerful PC could do. I got frustrated mid gen and bought a PC when games like Uncharted 4, God of War, and many more only targeted 30fps. If you think DL2 is bad on PS4 just take a look at the recommended PC requirements. You will see how far the PS4 punches above it's weight. No PC with a PS4's specs could run DL2. I also use PC as a metric because last and current gen consoles are X86 64-bit machines which utilize PC architecture. Gone are the days of the PS2's emotion engine and the PS3's cell processor. Modern consoles are much more boring from a tech perspective. But, it does make them infinitely easier to make games for.
My advice to you is if you want all games to play at a locked 60fps at a 1080p minimum is to go for a current gen console or a PC that will meet your preferred specs. The messed up market doesn't make this a cheap or easy proposition. But, it can be done. Especially if your aim is a PC and you don't mind buying prebuilt, getting a used graphics card (however AMD's 6600 and 6600XT's new are closest to normal in price and perform great at 1080p), or waiting for the market to stabilize.
I know this is a long post. I'm not trying to talk down to you either. You just need to know that the PS4 is old now. That it's only going to have a harder time running the latest games at your preferred quality. It sucks seeing your tech investments become obsolete. Especially if you paid $400 for a PS4 around launch like I did. I had to come to terms with it myself. DL2 is very demanding on every platform. I was not happy at all to see it running at 1080/60 on PS5 either.
Better preforming hardware is always around the corner. And, even a shiny new RTX 3090 will eventually have an expiration date. I know my current PC or PS5 will one day become obsolete. ...Best of luck to you man.
Do not buy this game on last-gen. After 200+ hours on a ps4 slim i have noticed a lot. Frame rate constantly takes a dip, resolution is 720p, bugs galore both immersion breaking and gamebreaking, textures not loading, numerous audio bugs, numerous AI glitches and a whole lot more. This game was NOT built for last-gen, and it very much is a repeat of Cyberpunk. Don't buy it, save your money.
Developers should really give 1440p 60 fps with RT in these current generation machines.
Thank you for keeping us "Last Gen Losers" in mind with these videos!!! Still loving my Ps4 Pro and One X!!!
++
You're not a loser, you're more sensible with your money than people that buy new gen consoles at launch
@@charizardoreo I see you sippin that copium👀
@@charizardoreo i mean if you got the money to spend how’re not sensible? explain.
Dude, I'm still on PS4 Slim, I would love to have a PS4 Pro so I can play games like Genshin Impact and Okami HD and in native 4K or games like New Super Lucky Tales and Shadow of the Colossus at 60fps.
Even Fortnite has much better graphics ( like draw-distance, shadow quality and texture quality ) on PS4 Pro compared to PS4 Slim.
Great video! I have a beast of a PC but want to play with friends and my X box is seriously outdated (and this isn’t cross platform for some reason) so I wanted to see how much it a hit I was taking for my buddies. Excellent video as always! Thanks a lot
Even on PC it's very demanding. DLSS is pretty much always guaranteed to be on for this game. Hopefully patches will help with all platforms soon.
Yeah, I have a 3080 and i HAVE to use DLSS to get more than 60fps at 4k, even at the lowest preset.
They focused more on the last gen versions to avoid replicating another Cyberpunk disaster. That said they’ve seriously neglected next gen versions, running at 1080 optimized for the Series X??? Absolutely ridiculous!!!!
I’d say PC was their focus
These new consoles are roughly equal to 2070 super and you get like 40 fps at 1440p with that card so it all make sense why they locked it to 1080p 60 fps.
Basically they focused on last gen and still ended up with a low frame rate graphical monstrosity. Seems like misplaced development focus.
@Transistor Jump What is it equal to than? I hope you ain't one of those that says it's equal to 3090.
This might run fine at 30 fps on all systems but the blurry resolution and last gen visuals on the PS5 and Xbox Series X are a real disappointment. None of the modes on the new systems offer everything. You can have a higher resolution than 1080p but only at 30 fps. You can have 60 fps but only at 1080p. You can have ray-tracing but only at 1080p and 30 fps. After playing games like Spider-Mam: Miles Morales and Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart that offer 1080p+, 60 fps *and* ray-tracing it is hard not to feel let down by this game.
There's a real sense that the developers have just opted for the lowest resolution to guarantee the most stable performance, which sounds great in theory, but in practice it comes across as underwhelming considering how much more powerful the current gen systems are over the older systems in terms of CPU and GPU performance. Why didn't they use dynamic resolution scaling to maximise the capabilities of the new systems, especially the Xbox Series X with its VRR support? Even the loading times on PS5 and Xbox Series S|/X are seriously lacking. It really seems like the developers did not optimise the game fully for each system but instead targetted very safe settings. You would think that by targetting the oldest hardware, the base Xbox One S and PS4, that the game would scale up better than this for the new systems but, sadly, not.
The PC version looks better but only because it adds realistic global illumination but to use that you have to spend much, much more than the cost of a next-gen console to enjoy it in all its glory and then you have to use 'tricks' like DLSS to get decent performance with RT on. There's no running this game natively at 60 fps and 4K even on a £2,500 GTX 3090 graphics card.
What an idiotic take Spider man and ratchet and clank are EXCLUSIVES, not a multi platforms
they had to work on 1-3 consoles
techland had to work on 8! platforms, see the difference
We can always count on Digital Foundry to do an amazing job.
😬
AC Valhalla , Far cry 6 are an example of how a well optimized games can be made .
Watch dogs legions had only quality mode when launched but later ubisoft added performance mode to run at 1440 @ 60 fps and at that time exactly i bought it .
Most of us got new gen consoles to get new gen gaming experience .
right? and everyone wants to sit there and shit on Ubisoft.. at least my purchases were validated by actually *using* the tech
@@Boxxcutter You are absolutely right. FC6 running at 1440p60fps on Series S is a insane feat
Far cry 6 on ps5 at least has a pretty bad stuttering problem unless they have fixed it in the last 2 months
AC Valhalla and watchdogs launched with bugs and bad performance and only got better after a couple of patches.
@@wumbobumbo9382 It’s on all platforms and PC. It’s an issue with the engine.
Nice to see the game still looks pretty good on last gen systems.
I feel like I've been waiting 5 years for this game to come out, and I didn't want to have to wait to play it till the new consoles become available.
900p with stutters is “looking good” to you?
I wonder how the one X would perform with a modern CPU, the GPU side is a great feat by Microsoft, shame they had to stick with the jaguar cores for better compatibility back in 2017
The GPU in the Xbox One X is equivalent to a RX 580, the Series S in rasterization performance is equivalent to a GTX 1650 Super, PS5 a RTX 2060 Super and Series X a RTX 2070. With a better CPU like a Ryzen 7 1800x the games on the Xbox One X would have run at 1440p upscaled to 4K at 60fps with graphics settings equivalent to low and medium quality textures. The GPU in the Xbox One X was a entry level Polaris GPU paired with a CPU weaker than a second generation Intel Core I5 CPU.
Да графическая часть там не слабая
@@ZackSNetwork No.
It has more cores than a 580. 200+ more in fact.
It's equivalent to an RX 590.
Lack of HDR on PS5/XSX was shocking.
Wow. 1080p and no hdr at 60 fps?
The PS5 and Series X really got the shaft with this game it seems. Hardly takes advantage of the better specs and definitely doesn’t utilize the SSD tech of both machines either. Really disappointing.
Games looks very outdated even on next gen consoles. It feels more like another Dying light 1 expansion, engine is really outdated.
@@kigasdj2 Yeah I’m playing it and really unimpressed. It looks awful.
Agreed!
It's objectively disappointing
You can tell this is not fully optimized on ps5 and series X the other versions are way too close.
Honestly I think this engine itself is largely unoptimized. The fact that PS5 and Series X have to drop to 1080p to run at 60fps says enough...and the series s being locked to 30 is honestly sad...and the lack of HDR support is disappointing
There’s no HDR support on series x or ps5??
4k 60fps ma ass.. lol
@@derekobrien-wood9530 no unfortunately
@@swayamkrishnan8273 ugh. Bullshit.
1080p 60fps and still no hdr. These consoles don’t seem very powerful
@@derekobrien-wood9530 it’s not the consoles. You do realize this game isn’t fully optimized especially when we have other next gen games running at 1440p 60 frames and some 1080 120 frames.
After this backlash they will have no choice but to patch it for series x and ps5. I'm buying it but not yet.
Same here. I’m not buying it until I heard resolution is improved. There’s no reason a cross-gen game couldn’t run this at 4K60 on next gen.
1080p on ps5 hurts my soul.
Only thing with this video is that he keeps using the One S as the base xbox one. The base Xbox one has 1.31 tera flops whereas the S has 1.4. Its not a major difference but it could mean 2-3 extra frames. It S also has a better HDMI port for better cables soo nit sure why the S is used as the base but the base PS4 is used... As the base. Yeah
🤔
This is exactly the review I was looking for before I bought Dying Light 2 for my Xbox One. While I’m looking forward to getting a Series X and playing it there, I’m glad I’ll be able to enjoy this in the meantime.
Same here, sitting here with an OneX and will by this game tommorow.
Techland decided that the performance mode on PS5 and Xbox Series X is a locked 1080p 60FPS. It's burry on the LG CX because its literately 1/4th the pixels blown up to fit a 55 inch TV that's why checkerboard 4K or dynamic 4K exists.
Great video as always
I am so happy about its performance on the base PS4, I didnt know it was on that until right now, and I was upset I couldn't play it without the switch cloud version due to my PC being a bit out of date and not up to parr to play Dying Light 2, but now I don't have to worry, because now there is a good, solid PS4 version I can play instead
I think drs is a common thing nowdays its really weird that these guys didn't use it in any version
I wish you’d stop bigging up the ray tracing in quality mode on the next gen consoles because it looks absolutely horrid. This game doesn’t even have HDR which is totally unacceptable.
Even if the game didn't implement HDR. Consoles would still convert the SDR picture to an HDR one. I know with Windows 11 the moment the gane startup. Windows Auto HDR which is based of Series X kicks in.
@@tyrcipher8811 this game doesn't have Auto HDR on Xbox
@@alex.starostin Well damn... At least I can enjoy auto hdr on pc.
Basicaly the new gen consoles runs the last gen versions of the game with 60 fps but i dont see a difference in the textures
Optimization should’ve been the NUMBER ONE thing on their checklist. This game ride or dies on the frames per second, because the movement and combat is always moving at a very fast pace. 30fps should’ve been a BIG NO in development. No 4K60 or HDR. Disappointed.
There is only so much you can "optimize." You get to a point where it no longer does anything and what holds it back is computational power. Better hardware is needed. The last-gen consoles are so outdated at this point. Optimization would not make DL2 perform better because the graphical power of last-gen is just not there anymore.
The lower quality graphics settings for the last-gen consoles is the "optimization" and I don't think there is much Techland can do.
There might be some things they can squeeze out of the engine, but I don't expect it to make much difference.
Very lazy job from the developer.
The game should've been running:
OneS: 900p30
PS4: 1080p30
PS4Pro: 1440p30
OneX: 1600p30
PS5/XSX:
2160p30
1440p60
1440p30 RT
But it doesn't try to reach those numbers. What a half assed job from the developers and such a disappointment. Do not support lazy tactics like this - we deserve better than playing 1080p on current gen machines.
Thanks for still covering one s and last gen in general
For me it runs pretty decently on PS4.
864p 30Fps no Low e vc acha decente. Kkkkk 😂🤣😂
@@nathanael3949 Pelo que joguei sim, tirando alguns bugs, o jogo ta bonito, pelo menos pra quem nao liga para algo de ponta, ainda mais sendo gratis na 9.00 com jailbreak.
We need further testing in quality mode on series X. Many are reporting a sub, inconsistent 30fps experience.
I’d love to see what a 2013 PC could handle. It’s worth a mention is you have to compare consoles to PC
Exactly. Can be used for web browsing.
Its kind of hard to do with the vram difference if 3gb vram is not enough. Example a 780ti has 3gb while ps4 has 8gb. A gtx 1060 is close to 780ti and has 6gb vram. Also a rx480 (8gb) Then when it comes to CPU you need 8 core CPU something Intel didn't launch until 2018 especially important with DRM pc has to deal with. Then hopefully you can copy console settings exactly a lot of games tend to have certain graphic settings lower on console than the lowest possible on PC. Then there is dynamic resolution(this game has FSR though so that will be possible here)
The AMD Radeon R9 290X was the best GPU of 2013, with 5.6 TFLOPS compared to the PS4 with 1.8 TFLOPS.
I was waiting for this video
And the people saying ubisoft games are badly optimized
At least they can do 4k 60fps on xbsx or 4k 30fps on xb1x
Not 1080p 60fps on xbsx or 1080p 30fps on xb1x
WHAT! Why are they praising this game like it's so good it's BAD especially for a sequel point blank period.
after watching this video, i am even more disappointed not having a 60fps mode on series s.
They got lazy, they probably just gave a One X port with a little polish to the Series S and called it a day.
Series S really isn't a powerful machine AT ALL. what do you think is going to happen when truly new gen games come out? 🤔 this is built for 8 year old systems and series S still taking huge hits. Honestly the series S is really only good for higher framerate multiplayer games in low resolution. So basically it can still be a console for competitive gaming at low res but anything else is going to take huge hits. And even then there will be a bunch of multiplayer games that it won't run at 120fps when new gen only games come out. But at least for last gen competitive games it's doing allright if your ok with lower resolution. But I'd say that's really all it's good for.
@@sneakkyz3696 rubbish. If an xbox studio created the game it would definitively run 60fps. After Buying Activision series s will be the 60fps Standard!
@@MG-fb2fr so IF it were an Xbox game you may be right but most games that come out WON'T be. So not rubbish at all when those are the facts.
@@sneakkyz3696 lets wait and See! Wiish you a nice evening from germany
Thank you i was waiting for it!!!!
I m so disappointed with PS5/XS performances, i will wait and hopefully for a patch before buying it. Glad some people are enjoying it anyway, but for me it is an hard pass
Yep same here. It’s a no go for me unless they improve performance. If this game gets a 40K/60 upgrade and fixes a lot of the issues is has I’m definitely buying it.
@@TheProphegy 4K60 won't ever happen on consoles with this game.
Wow thank you so much for this video. Very informative and just what I was looking for!
No HDR and a blurry 1080p in Performance mode on ps5 make me ignore this game sadly
Agreed. That made me skeptical and then I hear the game is broken and a lot of reviewers said the story sucks and none of the characters are memorable. People on Reddit said the combat isn’t as good as the first. If they update the game to do 4K60 I’ll get it.
@Oliver yours comparison is the best !!! always you say what graphics is on consoles vs pc etc. Great Job, that's we needed more technical less other ! :) now I know that performance and res mode on ps5 use high setting pc, differences is only on resolution and fps, so I chose performance on my oled a84j image is almost as sharp like on res mode, because sony XR processing in tv is on, and I. get 60 fps !
They made the right priority I would say to be able to release on time. Prioritize the FPS and playability. If they can push out better TAA or Dynamic resolution in future patches, that will be icing on the cake. This is much smarter way of doing things under time constraint then to release the game with huge performance issues like Cyberpunk. Most players only care about two things. 1. Is it fun? 2. Its not stuttering or crashing.
I remember when RDR2 come out and reviews were complaining about the visuals on Xbox One S, and literally the same week one of my friends visited and jut played it on his Xbox One S and commented that it was the best looking game he ever tried.
Yeah, I believe as time goes by the resolution will go higher....as more updates roll out.
I think that for this cross-gen period it would be a good idea to use FSR on old-gen consoles to mitigate the low resolution.
Nice stuff DF.
I had no worries that Dying Light 2 would Run well and Look ok on the Older Systems, i am so happy that people who are still Playing on the Older Consoles, can have a decent Playthrough of Dying Light 2.
Another solid video, Tom!
on the OneX i would be 100% happy with 720p rendering with 60fps. Makes you wonder what the situation would be like with DSR accross all platforms.
Impossible thanks to the jaguar cpu. Besides a handful of games the last gen consoles were 30fps thanks to the cpu not being very good for above 30fps. Its a better idea to crank up resolution and settings if possible on one x.
It’s not a resolution problem, its a CPU problem
@@darkwolf1739 DL2 runs 40-60 fps on old ass 4 core cpu like i5 2400 or almost rock solid 60 on i3 9100f. Jaguar can handle it, but devs are afeaid that it will be unstable+tearing and every consoleboy journalist will whine about it even tho it’s much better that 30fps
Interesting watch and it helped confirm a few suspicions I had about the game while playing it on a base PlayStation 4. Funny thing is that looking at it, I get this "Switch port" vibe. When you look at how the heavy hitters from the Xbox One and PlayStation 4 got ported to the Nintendo Switch and the sacrifices that were made to get it to run well enough on there, feels kind of the same when looking at the base systems, with the enhanced systems being more of the targeted platform.
Hopefully during the game's support they'll try and edge out some extra visual improvements to give a cleaner look to the base consoles, then give the enhanced and current gen systems an improvement to better flex their muscles (PlayStation 5 and Xbox Series systems in particular). Overall though, massive improvement compared to what we got with Cyberpunk 2077 and Watch_Dogs: Legion (the former in particular) as they game has been pretty smooth (well, as smooth as 30fps gets) with minimal pop in issues. See some from time to time, but no where near as bad as the pop ins from Cyberpunk 2077.
I’m glad that Techland decided to target and optimize for last gen consoles, since that’s where most console gamers are stuck. The downside is that the new gen console versions are kneecapped. Can’t wait for this cross-gen period to end.
Me too but this cross gen excuse for poor optimization is getting old. Look no further than insomniac games for why it's all BS
I wonder how long it will take. Looks like we need another 2 years for games to be released only on PS5 and new Xbox + PC :( = no true next gen games yet
@@K0xm4N and that's why Sony is winning cause you can play ps5 only games right now ratchet and clank rift apart, returnal, demons souls, etc etc but yea even their best upcoming games like horizon and gow will suffer due to being last gen too but they'll be much higher quality than this unoptimized disappointment
@@K0xm4N at least with pc you can brute force but you need a ton of money lmao
@@ShakeNbake9106 I like the etc etc, man , thePS5 has almost no real exclusives like the series X/S doesn't have any real exclusives :P not saying they're not winning in sales, but the ps5 is far from worth it at this time imo, the three you gave right now are the only three I can think of that didn't release cross gen, correct me if I'm wrong and there's anything else worthwhile, I'll add it to my list for when the PS5 Pro releases :D
Old consoles are 864p? Goddamn. 😂 RiP to those playing it on a 4K TV. They have to find a way to improve resolution.
So current gen consoles are running 1080P at 60FPS? Something doesnt sound right.
@Transistor Jump i agree completely though you would assume that with the development time they had, they could and or shouldve optimised it for current gen. Maybe we might get an update with said optimization but i highly doubt. Something like a PS5 mode with 1440P res/60FPS and some form of ray tracing like metro has done.
@Transistor Jump Maybe towards half of the current gen cycle, even though i would love to see it this year or next year. It kinda makes you wonder what the next generational leap will look like in the future. I mean i guess 4K with ray traced global illumination and ray traced reflections in 60FPS.
I only watch this for the lolz most of the time i love seeing these things pushed beyond belief, same with the switch.
I’m really impressed how solid all versions of this game are.
An actual finished release is to be commended these days.
Hahahahaha
No, ps4 version of the game is not solid at all. It is very bad in terms of resolution. And this sh*t still can't run at 60 fps....
You must not of seen reviews yet.
@@ПРОБокс-о5й players after expecting their decade old machine to get 60fps on a 2022 title!
@@outbobthelaw2248 this "2022 title" looks much worse that the first Dying Light. Just a terrible work from developers. Jeez, Fallout 76 looks better than this game.
This game is last gen to the brim. 7 years in development... Many delays.... That's what we get. Even on PC the game isn't performing well enough. Great job, Techland..
Yeah terribly optimised. They won’t be getting my money that’s for sure
if the one x can handle 1080p 30 then there is no damn reason that the series s cant hit 60fps.
Yep, really disappointed. Was hoping for like 1440p upscaled and dynamic on quality, 900p-1080p dynamic on performance
@@343Epsilon they could do that honestly. I don’t know why they don’t focus more on the new gen of consoles
The presentation of this video was really very good
I might be getting this game on PC.
Do it thank me later
Great vid, thanks for the comparison.
I only watch this to make myself feel better about giving my soul for a PS5.
Glad to hear this since I'll be playing on slim ps4!
Can't play it on my Series x. At 60 fps it looks like a 15 year old game in 1080p and at 30 fps the motion blur and judder makes me nauseous
I agree with lots of the other comments. This was barely optimized for current-gen consoles and the focus seems to have been on PC.
Huh? This game runs below 60fps, dropping as low as 47fps at 1080p on a $1500 RTX3090... The PC version is hardly optimized either.
thats not bad thing. if battlefield 2042 focus was pc it can be much better game all platforms.
@@nonyabusiness6084 My 3070 is doing 70 fps at 1440p with all RT options enabled. That's some serious cope you got going on there.
@@dmw7900 Goodness, "PC Master Race" kid, you must have a special 3070, more special than Digital Foundry's RTX3090, as that's where I got that information. Their own PC performance review.
@@nonyabusiness6084 They did not use a 3090. YIKES. Watch the video before commenting, dude. Makes you look ... slow.
I honestly am disappointed with the series x version and PS5 version. My son plays on a Xbox one x and it looks lost as good as my series x on resolution mode.. there is more than enough power to have a 4k 60 medium preset setting on series x and I hate that techland isn't taking advantage of the power
No there's not
@@IghorMaia lmao yes there is..... If my 3070 can run this game at 4k 60 there is more than enough power in the series x and PS5 to push these games to a good 4k 30 with Ray tracing or 4k 60 without but with higher texture resolution. The specs of these consoles unless they are lying puts in about the same range as my PC. Plus other games are doing it just fine.
They programmed for last gen and did a lazy resolution update for the next gen consoles and called it the next gen versions. Sorry but that's not how this should work.
Resolution is a bit low and everyone seems to mock them for that. But honestly, someone made the right decission and almost every system is very stable.
Can't wait to buy this on pc.. I'm Really impressed with last gen implementation here tho. I really didn't think it was going to pull it off as well as it apparently did.
Great video !
I’ll be honest, I think the old consoles are doing a remarkable job. One of the best looking last gen games to ever be released probably.
Batman Arkham Knight came out in 2014 and looks far superior still. Lol
More than DL2.
This doesn't even run at 1080p. Literally any of the PS exclusives look better than this: HZD, Ghost of Tsushima, GoW, TLoU2, etc. Even Uncharted 4, a 6+ year old game looks better than this. I know, 3rd person vs 1st person and all. In that case, Killzone Shadow Fall, one of the first titles on PS4, looks so much better than this, and even runs at 1080p.
Honestly, DL2 is one of the worst optimised games, on every platform. Last gen doesn't even get 1080p, it looks like 720p at times, blurry as hell. Current gen only has one mode with 60fps, ie - 1080p/60fps. And, the game is incredibly demanding even on high end PCs, plus there's Denuvo. Most Streamers and TH-camrs don't have performance issues because they have the best equipment, it's literally their job.
I love DL1, but Techland screwed up this release; with multiple delays, narrative rewrites, and working through the pandemic, something had to go wrong. I'm very disappointed in them, they also snuck in Denuvo on the PC version 2 days before launch. While the inclusion of Denuvo is fine for anti-piracy reasons, it's widely known to affect performance. But, sneaking it in 2 days before launch, when all the pre-orders are already in, that's very shady.
@@SmootherThanSilk dam your on point with this comment.👌👌
Horizon Zero Dawn looks better than this and it’s 5 years old. lol. Same for God of War which was 3 years ago. This does look solid though on last gen, but damn it’s 2022 I expect it to look good.
@@SmootherThanSilk If you even knew what the last generation consoles were equivalent to no were these games aren’t running in 1080p.
0:45 Cyberpunk 2077 wasn't "too ambitious", it was poorly optimized and mismanaged.
Cyberpunk was too ambitious for CDPR...let face it
I think Dying light 2 is also too ambitious for Techland
It was just a poor game which didn’t deliver what it promised
Curious to see how One X matches with Series S, all running at 1080p 30fps
One X medium 1080p 30Fps
Series S Alto 1080p 30Fps...
One X has better GPU, that's why.
@@nathanael3949 carious what if they take PS4 pro version (1080p/medium sittings)
And put on Xbox series s (much better CPU and GPU and a SSD)
Could then series s run the game at 60 fps instead of 30fps?
@@bhniyamohamadhosseini7781 probably not ,maybe at 900p
@@Omar-kl3xp actually am still ok with that
Thanks guys, since cyberpunk I always a bit worried of the last gen versions. Well done!
Sooo DF is gonna be testing GTA 6 on the PS6 and Xbox Series XX
I don't even play these games on my Series S let alone a last gen console (don't have one anymore)... But I love watching this kind of content, plus it's nice to know cross gen games aren't as bad as they were when it was Xbox 360 to Xbox One, I remember trying to play the few I tried being horrid (looking at you GTA 5, so happy I was mostly into pc gaming anyway, was a shitty time for console).
The 60 FPS mode on series X can run much higher then 1080 P. Bad optimalisation
It can't series x can't even run 1080p on halo infinite 🤣🤣🤣🤣
For real. Especially on series s, that little box can easily hit a dynamic 1440p on quality and a dynamic 1080p on performance
I'm just here to see if we had another Cyberpunk debacle on our hands and if I needed to avoid Dying Light as a last gen user. Thanks for answering that question in the video!
Wow, great port overall! They'd just need to sync the screen tear to the bottom/ top of the screen and i'd say that's a perfectly serviceable experience.
U get screen tear on base version to compensate the locked 30 digital foundary sed
@@optimusprime7491 most games on console that have dynamic vsync locks the tear to a fixed point in the screen usually at the bottom on the last 30 pixels or so... you can also do that on pc using msi afterburner
@@Brunn0121 Wait. What?
You can do that?
The most powerful console in the world is missing for this test.