So often, John plays with interviewers making sarcastic or goofy remarks, and Paul grounds the interview. It’s the opposite here! Paul is loosy goosy (one comment says he was stoned). John, who sometimes can't get a wird in, sounds serious and grounded. Hadn't heard this interview. Thanks for sharing it.
what insightful, intelligent answers. we're still restricted in what we can say only now our celebrities don't know what to say. they aren't as humbled as john & paul were
Wow! I thought i had listened to all their interviews from this time period. This is one of the best I've heard and i didn't know it was in existence until now. Thanks!
So many interviewers talked about how much money they were making, as if they should feel guilty about it. We don't hear that much anymore if someone is interviewing a modern Pop or Rock star. Modern wars are also not being talked about enough about how horrible they are. Vietnam is over, but the others get pushed and bigger. The Beatles reflected their times.
It’s like every American reporter went to the same broadcasting school to all speak in the exact same way. The Beatles were all about individuality and creativity. The older generation seemed to be about conformity and uniformity. Individual expression was frowned upon. This was a main ingredient in what was being called ‘The Generation Gap’…you can hear it in the tone of the reporter, he can’t seem to understand why they achieved their fame and notoriety. He keeps asking that question repeatedly. The older generation couldn’t quite understand the infectious appeal of the group with the younger crowd.
Radio/TV announcers and interviewers were schooled in their pronunciations/vernacular and voice inflections. They sounded similar. It's a reflection of their time. It's gone now.
@@NaaHvaI think he was busy convincing his and Paul’s family, friends and everyone they knew not to tell everyone he was Billy and keeping the secret for the rest of their and his life.
It's absolutely brilliant! John and Paul make each other. Their words are two answers to EVERY question!!! We need them NOW!
So often, John plays with interviewers making sarcastic or goofy remarks, and Paul grounds the interview. It’s the opposite here! Paul is loosy goosy (one comment says he was stoned). John, who sometimes can't get a wird in, sounds serious and grounded. Hadn't heard this interview. Thanks for sharing it.
what insightful, intelligent answers. we're still restricted in what we can say only now our celebrities don't know what to say. they aren't as humbled as john & paul were
Wow! I thought i had listened to all their interviews from this time period. This is one of the best I've heard and i didn't know it was in existence until now. Thanks!
They recorded this about an hour after I was born, a couple of miles away.
I fell right into them, in 1964, age 3 and 1/2. My big sisters had the records. I heard them incessantly.
Wonderful interview!
So many interviewers talked about how much money they were making, as if they should feel guilty about it. We don't hear that much anymore if someone is interviewing a modern Pop or Rock star.
Modern wars are also not being talked about enough about how horrible they are. Vietnam is over, but the others get pushed and bigger.
The Beatles reflected their times.
This is from the WNDT channel 13 program, "Newsfront" IN NYC....
It’s like every American reporter went to the same broadcasting school to all speak in the exact same way. The Beatles were all about individuality and creativity. The older generation seemed to be about conformity and uniformity. Individual expression was frowned upon. This was a main ingredient in what was being called ‘The Generation Gap’…you can hear it in the tone of the reporter, he can’t seem to understand why they achieved their fame and notoriety. He keeps asking that question repeatedly. The older generation couldn’t quite understand the infectious appeal of the group with the younger crowd.
Wow, this interviewer sounds similar to Larry Kane, but I guess in those days, most interviewers sounded very similar.
Yes, exactly.
Radio/TV announcers and interviewers were schooled in their pronunciations/vernacular and voice inflections. They sounded similar. It's a reflection of their time.
It's gone now.
Time Capsule ...
My son Paul mad devilish lmaooo “I’ll go along with that”
Curious, just asking. In what way is his answer mad devilish?
Paul was a bit stoned here, but John sounds quite lucid.
I think he sounds fine. He was just letting John speak.
Billy still had to work with his Paul McCartney-voice.
@@NaaHvaI think he was busy convincing his and Paul’s family, friends and everyone they knew not to tell everyone he was Billy and keeping the secret for the rest of their and his life.
00:12 John not taking any chances in the USA
What is Paul doing in the picture>?
Throwing darts? a ball?
Saludando a público.
He's throwing an apple - the point of their trip to New York was telling the press about their new Apple Corps/ Apple Records company. :)
Stoned 😍🙌👌👏😳😎😂🎵💯🤘😎😲🙂😄😀
15:36 lol
Faul
Paul
Paul...
🤦
Grow up about this ridiculous situation.
the faul on the hill