Except realtors have to disclose a property was foreclosed on. He would have known it had baggage when he bought it. The woman disagreed with the foreclosure but without more information the only people I can blame are the police.
The saddest part I keep hearing on these types of videos is not a lack of training, but a lack of common sense. Home and automobile ownerships are kept in easily accessible databases. Just go and look officer before you look like an idiot.
"Oh, wait, hold on a sec officer, I have the deed here in my wallet". How many homeowners can prove they own it while being accosted by a cop while working on the house? Such an insane excuse.
if the cops were decent human beings they would (after hearing the man say he was the owner) look up who owns it online. It would've been SO easy for them to determine who actually owned the house
Because Cops deserve no respect so they get none. They're the only ones with the power to change that which makes a statement about their intelligence when they don't follow up on that.
Setting yet another example of how police misconduct is what is defunding them. They should have referred it to the feds for federal civil rights charges. 18US241 and 242 are crimes. They should be arrested, charged, tried and barred from being in positions of power and authority for the remainder of their lives.
Too many times it is, "Oops. I didn't know..." For them. For us it is ," ignorance is no defense for breaking the law...." I find it highly funny that people who are supposed to enforce the law are some of the least educated people about the law.
Not police, is how you must act. Hey, you killed x people, here on this camera is seen you doing it Nope, didn't do it. The same thing is a former twitter or facebook executive in recent congress hearing being demolished how he took part is clear constitutional violations and colluded against their rights. Nope, i don't remember that, is a mistake. We have evidence hear of you aknowledging and doing it Nope, don't remember doing that
Personally, I wouldn’t live in that community after something like this. Every damn cop in the area now knows who he is, and they will retaliate any way they can after this!
I bought a house in Gilbert, AZ on "short sale" as the owners wouldn't pay their mortgage any longer. It 'closed' in September of 2010. However whenever I went over to the house and tried to get in, the police were called and despite telling the police that I had purchased the house in September, they said that there wasn't anything that they could do as the house was "occupied". I told them that it was a short sale and they hadn't paid anything to live there in over a year. One guy was looking up records on the Gilbert site. The unknown cop that was looking up the records, put up his hand towards me and told me to get back to the curb, he talked to the squatters and the former owner protested, that cop the pointed at me and said something else. The squatter put his head down and walked back into the house. The cop came and said, "If they aren't out by next week, give me a call, and if they trash the place, give me a call." Then they drove away. IF YOU ARE BUYING A 'SHORT SALE' PUT IN THE ADDENDUM THAT THE FORMER OWNERS MUST EVACUATE THE HOUSE BEFORE CLOSING.
"if they trash the house" you will pay for it, have you ever tried to sue a tenant? my family did dozens of times and never got a dime. In fact, it cost 140$ a pop to evict them. If you believe that cop you are a moron btw.
@@RobinRobertsesq someone I know evicted the resistant squatters using insects and rodents, as the authorities wouldn't attend. They were about to demo the house once safe to do so and the squatters were run off, screaming and itchy. LOL.
When you can lie to Congress with complete impunity, the way Hillary Clinton did on multiple occasions, was totally busted in her lies, and completely got away with it, that sets a bad example for everyone else. When the most powerful politicians and the police can lie and get away with it, then why wouldn't the average person expect to get away with lying and leveling false accusations against someone? The whole Washington establishment and liberal media got away with framing a seated president of the United States for crimes they all knew he didn't commit, yet none of them have been prosecuted. And in the current lawless environment, the chances are that this lying woman won't be prosecuted, either.
Shhhiiiiitttttt, they don’t even charge the hood-rats for felonies most of the time……. Hell, a false report might just brighten up their day and give them a laugh…….😂
Said the cops allowed that crazy lady to enter his fucking house. Besides that being clearly illegal entry, what was she even trying to do while she was inside his home with his possessions? How terrifying.
Back in the 70s I worked security job. I had to report an older employee about not responding to radio calld. I said in my report I suspected he may have hearing problems. The next day he came into work and slammed down a card he got in the military saying his hearing was perfect. The card was dated 1942.
@@charlesblackman1236 Even if she had nothing, I would still sue the woman and get her paycheck detached to pay the judgement. It's not really about the money, it's really all about punishing her.
@@charlesblackman1236its more about making an example out of her. If they can get a judgement against her it makes it harder for her to pull a con on someone else.
It seems like all the officers needed to do was ask dispatch who the current owner of that address was. That would have saved a ton of time and embarrassment for the PD.
Same with the police who failed to take 30 seconds to check public property records first. The sale would have been in the records. They all need to be charged for their crimes. It is absurd that police purposely don't validate ownership records before doing stuff like this.
@@_PatrickO That would involve "investigation" and we all know how much they love to NOT actually do the effort of logical , but use "investigation" as an excuse to detain people and arrest them for jollies.
I truly will never understand how people can be so angry towards others they don’t even know. I hope accountability comes for everyone who wronged this man.
@@knghtbrd Lately, I have been obsessing over this case in Huntsville, Alabama. A man called 911 telling them that he wanted to kill himself. Two police officers arrive and begin de-escalating the situation. One officer stays outside of the house The other officer stands in the doorway and establishes a rapport with the man. Throughout the entire incident the man has (what looks like) a gun pointed at his own head. Potential suicide, right? After a while, a third officer arrives on the scene. He arms himself with a rifle and runs into the house. He pushes past the officer talking to the man. He yells at the officer to draw her weapon. He orders the man to drop his gun. Then he shoots the man. This all occurred within three minutes. The officer claimed that he acted because of officer safety. The first officer on the scene testified for the prosecution. She stated that there was no reasonable danger of imminent serious injury to herself or the other officers. The man never threatened anyone (except himself). The officer was convicted of murder The City of Huntsville AND police unions all over the country are supporting him (morally and financially). They claimed that his behavior was heroic. Their argument was that he had to make a "split second" decision. Of course that decision was that "officer safety" justified his actions. They criticized the other officers because they failed to back him up. On cross examination, the defense attorney asked the female officer whether officer safety was an issue for her during the incident She explained (again) that the man did not pose a reasonable danger of imminent harm to anyone but himself. Then she said what I have been dying for an officer to say. She said that this was a dangerous job.
@@errolhobson1653 I would even take it further. When facing an obviously unarmed person, they shoot, tase, and/or gang up to beat the person senseless. They justify their actions by claiming that they were afraid that the person MIGHT do something. Contrast that behavior to how they respond to ONE person shooting at them (or others).They run like the "p___y-a___d b_____s" we all know they are. Immediately afterwards, they hold a press conference, praising the brave front line officers who gladly put themselves in danger "to protect and serve" the people. Two or three days later, when civilians post their cellphone and private security camera footage of the incident. The Chief/Sheriff/Mayor release a statement threatening to arrest the people who posted the videos, claiming that they are "Obstructing an on-going investigation." When the families of the victims announce that they have hired Benjamin Crump to represent them. The Chief/Sheriff/Mayor start quietly throwing money at the families. At the same time they hold ANOTHER press conference, announcing that they have initiated an internal review so that they can determine what type of additional training is required. They look sad, and say that "the families and friends of the victims, as well as the whole community, are in their thoughts and prayers. At the very end of the press conference, they invite the victims' families to meet with them. And then, they hide. They pray that their attorneys will be able to negotiate a settlement agreement that prohibits the families from disclosing any details of the agreement. AND, they pray that the next tragedy occurs on the other side of the country. A year or two later, they send a one page letter to the families. They inform them that after an "thorough and comprehensive investigation," they have determined that: (1) all of the officers acted in accordance to applicable laws, policies, and procedures; or (2) they have determined that some departmental policies and/or procedures were violated and the offending officers have been disciplined. If it was a really bad incident, they will say that "officer/deputy Joe/Joan Blow has resigned from the department." Of course, they fail to mention that the officer/deputy is now working for a law enforcement agency two counties away AND that they were able to get that job because they resigned before the end of the investigation. If it was a truly horrendous incident, the letter will simply say that "the matter has been referred to the District Attorney's office." A year or three after THAT, the District Attorney's office will announce that they have reached a plea agreement with officer/deputy Blow. Officer/Deputy Blow has agreed to plead guilty to two counts of misdemeanor disorderly conduct. He/she will serve two years of unsupervised probation. During that time, he/she will be assigned to desk duties. Two years after that, there is a small notice on the department's webpage, announcing that officer/deputy Blow is now Sergeant Blow. Did I miss anything?
@@johngalt97 The ties is established when the previous owner suddenly shows up with a 27 years old title deed and claims that the current owner is trespassing. Do you walk around with your title deed?
Right? I'm a nurse, which is a difficult job, but people wouldn't be quiet if I started tranquilizing people with overdoses because they were too rowdy... 😳 Rather that gets you on an episode of nurses who kill on Netflix.
The previous owner basically swatted the poor guy. Funny how they say your DL does not prove anything, but the first thing an officer wants during an interaction is the drivers license.
Sounds like a 10 minute investigation into county records could've cleared it up. Just like normal, we pay, and very handsomely, public officials to do a job, but dont do it :/
I was having a new electric line put on a house and needed okay from Ohio Edison. When I gave them the serial number I was suddenly sent to their fraud department. After telling him I recently bought the property, I was put on hold for a few minutes. The guy came back on and gave the okay. I'm sure he looked up the property and saw I was telling the truth.
Qualified immunity. Which is why the government always settles these case once they lose the initial trial. No government law enforcement at any level wants qualified immunity be examined.
You mean cops. There is a difference between a police officer and a cop. A police officer is courteous and serves the public. A cop is a thug with a gun and badge.
You can pull up ownership history in less than 1 minute by accessing the property appraisers website on your phone.......it would even have a copy of the foreclosure order and your purchase date
You're right. The previous owner who SWATted him should be charged with filing a false police report and probably a whole list of other things related to deliberately abusing the police to harass the new owner. Hopefully the new owner gets a judgement paid before the previous owner begins their prison sentence.
If you think police is dumb , just listen to this, I took my grand son to a public Park, while sitting watching , two [police car drone upon the park going a 100 miles per hour, They jump out with weapon in hand, They pull their weapons out on a 6 week old baby, crying next to his young mother, The people start yelling put you weapon down that a baby, the police turn and told the people they fear for office safety, They thought the 6 week old baby was going to attack them, both cops weighted 220 pound with guns, billy club ,Mace, and other weapon plus back up , yet fear a 6 week old baby, This is police in America, Big ego and low IQ
Let's implement more accountability laws. If the police wrongly arrests law-abiding citizens, they should be the ones who pay the damage, not taxpayers. And they should be stripped off all bonuses and wages for a significant period of time and are made to do community works. That way, there will be no more police brutality. I see lots of police today are merely thugs in uniform.
The county lawyer who argued in front of an American judge that the plaintiff had to prove his innocence to the police should probably no longer be a lawyer.
The former homeowner should also be fined for perjury & filing a false police report and placed in jail for just as she had the new owner because in fact she was trespassing on his property.
The People should have Regulations and Ways to both PUNISH and FORCE a Cop to be Fired. And even so far as having the POWER to Disbar an Officer from EVER being work in the Security and Governmental Sector.
Good question. It seems that police are all too willing to lay charges against you for absolutely trivial, needless, made up or even wrong reasons at times, but it seems few and far between that the perpetrators or instigators of these sorts of things get charged.
They should have charged the woman with filing a false report, and he should be able to sue her too. I'm wondering if she was friends with any of the cops considering they instantly took her side and didn't arrest her right away when they found out she lied.
I grew up next door to Prince Georges County and I gotta say, I am so NOT shocked by this. Can't remember how many times the DoJ investigated that police dept.
True, unfortunately. So much corruption all around but it’s getting better. I work for the school system and once asked coworkers the name of the county commissioner who went to jail and they asked which one. (It was the one who was flushing money down the toilet and having his wife stuff money in her bra when the FBI were at their door.)
Definitely filing a false report on the previous owner and definite lawsuit against him/her. All this obviously started with someone who couldn't make their payments and was bitter. Finding documentation online isn't that hard. Tax records, PVA records. Something that could have been easily found while on the scene BEFORE taking someone's rights away. I see so much wrong in this scenario.
They are just blind, dense, or simply not aware of how global this is. Many on rebelnews yt channel...keep saying I am glad I don't live in Canada. I always tell them it's happening here in the US and give them an example.
Such as the attempted murder most vehicle "accidents" are? I was once hit by a broad while sitting still. 83 feet of skidmarks and she still hit me at about 45mph. In a 35 mph zone. She was charged with "following too closely".
🎯 That’s why the greatest threat to our freedom and Constitution (police) are still blindly supported by so many. Ironically, it’s people that genuinely hold freedom and the Constitution in high regard.
Agreed, not just them either. Those who have the ability to make them face consequences also don't do their job either. The entire system needs to be fixed, it's clear it doesn't work properly as it is. I think anyone working for the government, especially police, who knowingly use/abuse that power against someone needs to go to jail and never be able to have a state/government job again. Why even try to risk it happening again by keeping them? It's pretty bad when fast food chains have higher standards than police.
But if you ask most people....they still trust the police and that just blow my mind. A man or woman who has gone through 3.5 months of school can take away my freedom, legally lie to me, and/or shoot and kill me. Did I mention how to cut hair in my state takes 1.5 years ? Cutting hair 1.5 years vs carrying a badge and a gun 3.5 months. Even Stevie Wonder could see the problem with this.
And whose fault is that? The majority of Americans want this type of law enforcement. If we didn't, the majority would demand something better. Black folks been telling us that for years.
All the videos on this channel are very well explained, detailed and worthwhile to listen to. And the cases are often so outrageous that it gives some perspective to the disputes we have here in England and makes me feel better about living here!
My next door neighbor tried to do this to me. His mother sold me the house. The Sheriff's deputies that responded did check with the County Assessor's office and verified my ownership. It was quick and easy for them.
Only cops can be found guilty of felonies and never spend a day in prison. Abolishing qualified/absolute immunity is the only right first step towards accountability and constitutional based policing.
That is the interesting thing. QI does not protect from criminal acts. DA's use this as an excuse not to prosecute. And bad judges will support this unlawful unethical conduct.
While like the way you think, that is not the case here. The cops were acting in their roles as police. That they were wrong is secondary. The Supreme Court has said repeatedly that a government official doing their job can not be held liable. Because if they were held liable for their acts, then they could be threatened to be sued into oblivion. Not just cops, but building inspectors, traffic court cashiers, and street and sanitation workers. Thus comes "qualified immunity". The SC has also said that qualified immunity does not apply when it is clear that a reasonable person would know that activity is wrong. (see TAYLOR v. RIOJAS, ET AL. SC, 2020, prison guards lost qualified immunity because they should have known that putting a prisoner in an unheated cell, unclothed, with no running water, and feces on the wall and floor violated the 8th Amendment) Qualified immunity is a necessary aspect of any government official to do their job without fear of being sued personally.
The problem is that the courts have forgotten the word qualified and give them absolute immunity. The recent ruling by the fourth circuit may now have set a new precedent that can be referred to.
Sounds like somebody should of been charged with making a false police report. Could of the county only went after him to run out the clock on filling a false police report
This is what makes me so very angry, that the officers broke the law, that they ignored the law and that they were terrible humans beings yet are still employed as police. We need to fire and blacklist this type of employees.
@@johnwilson6707doesn’t matter, we don’t want cops that act like this, maybe if there are some consequences for their actions others will think twice but this, just let’s them know they can do whatever they want and get away with it
Thank you from Ireland. We lost our self built house. The Police are forced by the council to get property, even when the Police have been called for 15 years to violence and intimidation. They allowed the developers to grab 50A in lieu of house taken by NAMA, 49A. Not ours. We were told we would be arrested if we stayed. His younger brother was forced to register house as his. Council knowingly paid the wrong brother. They allowed the IRA developers steal our house.
@@dickgozinya1615 I don't quite get how the second amendment is relevant to such a case, maybe you can elaborate. I have just re-read it just in case I was missing something but I still don't see how it would apply. Could it be some other amendment you meant to refer to? I'm assuming, possibly incorrectly, that you are referring to the United States constitution.
@@listerdave1240 the police are not here to protect or serve you that’s just propaganda the Supreme Court ruled on that like 20’years ago the second amendment guarantees you the right to bare arms thus allowing you to defend yourself and your property if squatters take over your house and the cops won’t help you because of reasons then it’s up to you handle your business and get a jury trial or ya could go another route and just host a huge party at that location a party so huge that the “owners” are gonna get arrested that may work as well
I refer you all to the Castle doctrine law. The fact that those police forced him out of his own property is just one more bit of proof that America is not free
I got put at gunpoint through a wooden fence in my own back yard, letting my brothers dog out. They’re reason “you look suspicious in that camo coat”. For context: I was wearing a hooded woodland print hunting jacket and the hood was down , standing on my back porch in a fenced yard at around 2am I had my arms crossed and was telling the dogs “hurry up it’s freezing”. After identifying myself and my brother yelling “ what the fuck is going on out there?!” From the house and him identifying me aswell (they had ran my ID so that wasn’t necessary). Rather than be like “sorry about that” they basically told me I shouldn’t wear camo basicaly ever because it’s suspicious. I live in the country it’s kind of normal to wear out here. This dude looked like he was a kid and shouldn’t have a car let alone badge or a gun. Almost thought some kid took their dads cruiser for a joyride just to fuck with me.
I had my custom pickup painted matte black, because it looked cool and in 2000 it showed well at the Saturday morning Car Chat and Chew, at a local car friendly coffee shop. I kept getting stopped for no reason. The 4th time I asked the cop why. His answer was "You look like your trying to hide something." My reply was "Officer I have $40,000 in this truck, and $15,000 is paint and chrome. Where can I hide in broad daylight?" No reply. He just handed back my license and walked away. (Expletive deleted).
Why is it, in so many of these police "encounters", a simple phone call is all that is necessary to clarify stories and avoid embarrassing everyone--*yet* the police fail to make those calls??? It's mystifying to me!!! 🤔
That would assume that cops have the capacity to think for themselves. Extra phone call ?. Yes, but that means making the extra effort needed to press all those pesky buttons on the phone.
They didn't WANT to believe what they saw. The saw the email with the DEED but then THEY decided and Judged that it was FAKE. They want to be Judge and Jury. They had everything they needed as proof, but they denied it.
While I don’t believe that “no one is ever arrested” for filing false police reports, I do believe that not enough people are arrested, charged, and punished for making them. If that was the “standard”, I think false reports would happen much less often.
What I want to know is why the article didn't name the real criminal here, the woman who went into the police department and filed a false report? Why is there no accountability for her? I am delighted Mr. Tubo received a settlement from the county but is that disgusting woman really going to walk away like nothing happened after disrupting this man's life like that? She probably doesn't have any money worth pursuing seeing as the home was lost in foreclosure, but she needs to do some jail time.
Y'know what? if we could find the address, we can look up public records and find her ourselves. Isn't that what the hoard of public shaming internet gurus are about?
How many times do things like this have to happen before we can just charge the entire justice department with negligence for not having a legal consultant on staff for the officers to use? They have millions of dollars of tech for giving officers real time information about vehicle registration and warrants, but they can't hire a few paralegals to sit and answer the phones.
Exactly. There should be a 24/7 attorney or paralegal staffed with live access to an officers bodycam to monitor interactions and ensure rights and liberties are not infringed upon. Eventually it will happen, hopefully.
The CA is often a lazy political patron who has no political ambition and if they did not graduate last in their class , they are often in the lowest 1% . I would not take advice from a CA on a dare . As for the DA , their business is high volume and high conviction rate , by any means necessary , the Constitution be damned . The want one thing , and that is a state legislature seat and the fast track requires a high conviction rate . Anything that impacts that conviction rate is a no go . Besides , they will not risk upsetting the folks that cover for their habitual drunk driving and other indiscretions .
The real sad part about this Steve is the officers will never really faced any kind of discipline or get retrained on that issue. We need to stop qualified immunity to officers like this we need officers to pay malpractice insurance just like doctors do that way where they get sued enough times they can no longer afford the insurance to be an officer.
I agree, but also raise the base pay and insurance benefits. If we ONLY raise the risk, then everybody is disincentivised. But if we raise the risk AND the reward, then we keep the good people incentivised and weed out the bad people. Increasing risk multiplicatively naturally increases the risk for those who act riskily more than it does for those who act safely. And one facet of safety is being up to date on training - knowing current procedures thoroughly allows the procedures to protect you. Another facet is remaining calm and collected, even in intense situations - this prevents hasty and brash decisions. Another facet is information gathering - the more information you have the less likely you are to make an uninformed decision. Right now there is too little risk for those cops who choose to act riskily (power trip, inconsiderate, lacking information, etc) to weed them out. But there is also too little incentive to bring people into the police force if the risk is increased. We need to raise incentives (most likely through base pay) and increase the risk in bad behavior (disincentivising bad behavior - ie: severely restrict qualified immunity - cops should know the laws they enforce - or malpractice insurance and lawsuits, etc).
The real sad part of this? The property was a foreclosure. And to foreclose on a property, the mortgage holder has to get approval from the county Clerk of Court's office. The Clerk of Court would have approved the sale. No attorney would do this who operates in that county, but I'd push to subpoena the Clerk of Court to testify at the hearing. That alone would probably have added another zero to the settlement. Because something like that would then get news coverage. I can just imagine the county's legal defense responding with, "I have no questions for this witness your honor."
You can be certain that this was just one of many abuses by these tyrants! You can't prove anything to someone that is determined not to be convinced. Do they train their cops to be obtuse?
One of the tragedies here is that it took over two years to win the case. I bet after attorneys fees there was not much left of the 300k, no mention of punitive damages.
he is a brain. Perhaps he's even a loquacious brain :D (brain in a jar) or maybe a Boltzmann brain, formed spontaneously to entertain the masses of us.
Nice to hear a supervisor willing to supervise. And many officers always fear everyone is trying to kill them, because that is their cowardice training.
Not to mention that if their boss could look up online and verify that he owned it they could have too or at least called their dispatch to have somebody look it up at headquarters...
Shouldn't the previous owner who lied to the police face jail time?
You would think they would for making a false statement to law enforcement. Isn't that a thing?
That was my first thought also
most likely not....its not worth the time in a cost/benefit analysis per law enforcement.
Why do you think Maryland is so set on disarming ther citizens with there insane gun control laws!!!!!?
Nah, the cops don't want to scare off future false reporters.
The former homeowner was angry about a foreclosure that had nothing to do with the new homeowner. She should have been arrested.
Except realtors have to disclose a property was foreclosed on. He would have known it had baggage when he bought it. The woman disagreed with the foreclosure but without more information the only people I can blame are the police.
STEVE WHY HAVE THEY NOT ENDED QUALIFIED IMMUNITY?
@@soujemn5just because a home was foreclosed on don’t mean it comes with baggage
@@cherrelleg8276 can you name a situation where a foreclosed on home doesn't have a previous owner that got foreclosed on?
Who should be arrested the new owner? If so why?
When it takes longer to become a cosmetologist than a police officer, we’re going to continually have problems like these
The saddest part I keep hearing on these types of videos is not a lack of training, but a lack of common sense. Home and automobile ownerships are kept in easily accessible databases. Just go and look officer before you look like an idiot.
How long does it take to learn to handcuff innoceent people?
2 years in England to become a police officer, with NO gun.
Also, if a cosmetologist pulls a gun and kidnaps a customer, they'll probably be punished more severely than getting a paid vacation.
I've literally been thinking that exact same thing!
Without a body camera, everything a cop states is hearsay. The woman who squealed should be arrested for swatting.
If half the cops did their job the other half would be in prison.
True and the main reason we know they are rotten through the whole department
😆😆👍
and the first half would all be unemployed.
@@userac-xpg no worries Mc Donalds is hiring.
@@Blue-hf7xt user was saying good cops get bullied out and fired because they don't submit to their peers.
"Oh, wait, hold on a sec officer, I have the deed here in my wallet". How many homeowners can prove they own it while being accosted by a cop while working on the house? Such an insane excuse.
You mean you don't carry all your documentation with you at all times?
@@rowynnecrowley1689 not the dead to my house.
@@rowynnecrowley1689 - I carry all my paperwork, but I must say this file cabinet gets pretty heavy. 🤪
How would a cop know how to validate a deed even if you did have one?
@@danielhoward8354 i hope you don’t carry dead to your house around the police
The person who showed an old deed and lied they owned it should have been prosecuted and sued.
Imagine being assaulted, handcuffed, detained, & arrested for "trespassing" *on the property you've owned for 6 months...*
YES ,,,MIND BLOWING
Only in America by American cops,they are special that's for sure
And working to improve it. I would love to have a squatter come remodel my house.
if the cops were decent human beings they would (after hearing the man say he was the owner) look up who owns it online. It would've been SO easy for them to determine who actually owned the house
@julianbrelsford I agree but cops can't use common sence,their training has got to be updated,and qualified immunity has to go
"Why don't people respect us?" --Cops
More than likely, one or both of the cops were Black.
😆😆😆
@@blackredneck4378 PG county, MD. You bet your ass they were.
Because Cops deserve no respect so they get none. They're the only ones with the power to change that which makes a statement about their intelligence when they don't follow up on that.
Why don't people respec *BLAM BLAM BLAM* got a random dog, why don't people respect us?
The one who filed the complaint should have been charged with filing a false police reports.
Knowingly filing a false police report in most jurisdictions is a crime .
I suppose she forgot she was forclosed on and evicted? Naw, we have 'knowingly' right there.
The Police investigated themselves, and regardless of what the court says - they found nothing wrong with what they did.
Thats called bias and thats how self investigations work.
Courts back corrupt cops every single day.
Thats the procedure.
Setting yet another example of how police misconduct is what is defunding them. They should have referred it to the feds for federal civil rights charges. 18US241 and 242 are crimes. They should be arrested, charged, tried and barred from being in positions of power and authority for the remainder of their lives.
No system ever finds fault with its self.
You gotta love how the police never admit to any wrongdoing even in the face of clear evidence and after losing a lawsuit.
Too many times it is, "Oops. I didn't know..." For them. For us it is ," ignorance is no defense for breaking the law...." I find it highly funny that people who are supposed to enforce the law are some of the least educated people about the law.
They get their egos and butt hurt
Police are just not very smart people. With some exceptions of course.
Not police, is how you must act.
Hey, you killed x people, here on this camera is seen you doing it
Nope, didn't do it.
The same thing is a former twitter or facebook executive in recent congress hearing being demolished how he took part is clear constitutional violations and colluded against their rights.
Nope, i don't remember that, is a mistake.
We have evidence hear of you aknowledging and doing it
Nope, don't remember doing that
When lawsuits come out of the police budgets rather than General Funds then Police and Towns/Cities will take better notice.
It never ceases to amaze me how police lower the bar of common sense and fail to de-escalate.
Not the fault of the police
@@SeanMorrisonRocks The jury disagrees with you.
former owners should be liable in a civil suit, as well as criminal charges...
Cops bought him his new house. Wonderful. The police are so inadequate.
the tax payers foot the bill when the govt screws up.
@@FractalPrism. The tax payers vote for the government they want.
Should take weekly installments from police officers pay until award is paid back to taxpayers.
Personally, I wouldn’t live in that community after something like this.
Every damn cop in the area now knows who he is, and they will retaliate any way they can after this!
@@dangeary2134 Sadly that is true.
I bought a house in Gilbert, AZ on "short sale" as the owners wouldn't pay their mortgage any longer. It 'closed' in September of 2010. However whenever I went over to the house and tried to get in, the police were called and despite telling the police that I had purchased the house in September, they said that there wasn't anything that they could do as the house was "occupied". I told them that it was a short sale and they hadn't paid anything to live there in over a year. One guy was looking up records on the Gilbert site. The unknown cop that was looking up the records, put up his hand towards me and told me to get back to the curb, he talked to the squatters and the former owner protested, that cop the pointed at me and said something else. The squatter put his head down and walked back into the house. The cop came and said, "If they aren't out by next week, give me a call, and if they trash the place, give me a call." Then they drove away. IF YOU ARE BUYING A 'SHORT SALE' PUT IN THE ADDENDUM THAT THE FORMER OWNERS MUST EVACUATE THE HOUSE BEFORE CLOSING.
good tip. thanks for the story.
"if they trash the house" you will pay for it, have you ever tried to sue a tenant? my family did dozens of times and never got a dime. In fact, it cost 140$ a pop to evict them.
If you believe that cop you are a moron btw.
If it were New York you would have had to pay all the expenses for the next 3 years as the squatters have more rights than the homeowners
Those situations often require an eviction.
@@RobinRobertsesq someone I know evicted the resistant squatters using insects and rodents, as the authorities wouldn't attend. They were about to demo the house once safe to do so and the squatters were run off, screaming and itchy. LOL.
Prosecutors really need to start charging people for filing false police reports.
Prosecutors really need to start charging police officers who act solely on hearsay.
When you can lie to Congress with complete impunity, the way Hillary Clinton did on multiple occasions, was totally busted in her lies, and completely got away with it, that sets a bad example for everyone else.
When the most powerful politicians and the police can lie and get away with it, then why wouldn't the average person expect to get away with lying and leveling false accusations against someone?
The whole Washington establishment and liberal media got away with framing a seated president of the United States for crimes they all knew he didn't commit, yet none of them have been prosecuted.
And in the current lawless environment, the chances are that this lying woman won't be prosecuted, either.
@@dantealighieri9540 and police officers should be fired if they are too lazy to look at ALL the evidence from both sides
@@Allantitan Agreed.
Shhhiiiiitttttt, they don’t even charge the hood-rats for felonies most of the time……. Hell, a false report might just brighten up their day and give them a laugh…….😂
The guilty cops and the woman who filed false reports should serve 7 years, minimum.
Said the cops allowed that crazy lady to enter his fucking house. Besides that being clearly illegal entry, what was she even trying to do while she was inside his home with his possessions? How terrifying.
Back in the 70s I worked security job. I had to report an older employee about not responding to radio calld. I said in my report I suspected he may have hearing problems. The next day he came into work and slammed down a card he got in the military saying his hearing was perfect. The card was dated 1942.
He also needs to sue the woman who caused all of this and she also needs to be criminally charged for the false report and causing false imprisonment.
I agree but what could you possibly get out of her? remember her property was foreclosed on.
@@charlesblackman1236 they would get jail out of her.
@@charlesblackman1236 Even if she had nothing, I would still sue the woman and get her paycheck detached to pay the judgement. It's not really about the money, it's really all about punishing her.
doubt she has any money.
@@charlesblackman1236its more about making an example out of her. If they can get a judgement against her it makes it harder for her to pull a con on someone else.
The police in this case need to be immediately terminated.
2nd amendment squad. At high noon.
They will probably get a promotion.
They should press charges against the person who filed a false report
It seems like all the officers needed to do was ask dispatch who the current owner of that address was. That would have saved a ton of time and embarrassment for the PD.
But that takes away the excuse to rough up a person for the fun of it.
The former owner knowingly committed a crime and should have been charged. I hope there is some follow-up so that we can know if that happened.
Same with the police who failed to take 30 seconds to check public property records first. The sale would have been in the records. They all need to be charged for their crimes. It is absurd that police purposely don't validate ownership records before doing stuff like this.
@@_PatrickO That would involve "investigation" and we all know how much they love to NOT actually do the effort of logical , but use "investigation" as an excuse to detain people and arrest them for jollies.
"The officers remain employed by the County police department." That's all we need to know.
Actually, it doesn’t matter. That 300k is tax payer’s money. That’s a bigger problem.
And NONE of us are surprised that they are still employed!
To discipline them would admit they were wrong. The only one to admit they were wrong was the lieutenant
It's a high crime that can ruin your career to lie on official police reports... unless you're a cop.
@@TheSiriusEnigma So chances for an repeat are there.....
I truly will never understand how people can be so angry towards others they don’t even know. I hope accountability comes for everyone who wronged this man.
that Karen also presented a document fraudulently, she should go to jail for a while.
It is so infuriating how police officers ALWAYS seem to be afraid for their safety.
Afraid for their safety. Never yours.
@@knghtbrd Lately, I have been obsessing over this case in Huntsville, Alabama.
A man called 911 telling them that he wanted to kill himself. Two police officers arrive and begin de-escalating the situation. One officer stays outside of the house
The other officer stands in the doorway and establishes a rapport with the man.
Throughout the entire incident the man has (what looks like) a gun pointed at his own head. Potential suicide, right?
After a while, a third officer arrives on the scene. He arms himself with a rifle and runs into the house. He pushes past the officer talking to the man. He yells at the officer to draw her weapon. He orders the man to drop his gun. Then he shoots the man. This all occurred within three minutes.
The officer claimed that he acted because of officer safety. The first officer on the scene testified for the prosecution. She stated that there was no reasonable danger of imminent serious injury to herself or the other officers. The man never threatened anyone (except himself).
The officer was convicted of murder
The City of Huntsville AND police unions all over the country are supporting him (morally and financially).
They claimed that his behavior was heroic. Their argument was that he had to make a "split second" decision. Of course that decision was that "officer safety" justified his actions. They criticized the other officers because they failed to back him up.
On cross examination, the defense attorney asked the female officer whether officer safety was an issue for her during the incident
She explained (again) that the man did not pose a reasonable danger of imminent harm to anyone but himself.
Then she said what I have been dying for an officer to say. She said that this was a dangerous job.
Yeah, while armed to the teeth. And the victims at best are armless.
What a disparity!!??
@@errolhobson1653 I would even take it further. When facing an obviously unarmed person, they shoot, tase, and/or gang up to beat the person senseless. They justify their actions by claiming that they were afraid that the person MIGHT do something.
Contrast that behavior to how they respond to ONE person shooting at them (or others).They run like the "p___y-a___d b_____s" we all know they are.
Immediately afterwards, they hold a press conference, praising the brave front line officers who gladly put themselves in danger "to protect and serve" the people.
Two or three days later, when civilians post their cellphone and private security camera footage of the incident. The Chief/Sheriff/Mayor release a statement threatening to arrest the people who posted the videos, claiming that they are "Obstructing an on-going investigation."
When the families of the victims announce that they have hired Benjamin Crump to represent them. The Chief/Sheriff/Mayor start quietly throwing money at the families.
At the same time they hold ANOTHER press conference, announcing that they have initiated an internal review so that they can determine what type of additional training is required. They look sad, and say that "the families and friends of the victims, as well as the whole community, are in their thoughts and prayers.
At the very end of the press conference, they invite the victims' families to meet with them. And then, they hide. They pray that their attorneys will be able to negotiate a settlement agreement that prohibits the families from disclosing any details of the agreement.
AND, they pray that the next tragedy occurs on the other side of the country.
A year or two later, they send a one page letter to the families. They inform them that after an "thorough and comprehensive investigation," they have determined that: (1) all of the officers acted in accordance to applicable laws, policies, and procedures; or (2) they have determined that some departmental policies and/or procedures were violated and the offending officers have been disciplined. If it was a really bad incident, they will say that "officer/deputy Joe/Joan Blow has resigned from the department." Of course, they fail to mention that the officer/deputy is now working for a law enforcement agency two counties away AND that they were able to get that job because they resigned before the end of the investigation.
If it was a truly horrendous incident, the letter will simply say that "the matter has been referred to the District Attorney's office."
A year or three after THAT, the District Attorney's office will announce that they have reached a plea agreement with officer/deputy Blow. Officer/Deputy Blow has agreed to plead guilty to two counts of misdemeanor disorderly conduct. He/she will serve two years of unsupervised probation. During that time, he/she will be assigned to desk duties.
Two years after that, there is a small notice on the department's webpage, announcing that officer/deputy Blow is now Sergeant Blow.
Did I miss anything?
Which is funny, because they don't even make the list of "most dangerous professions in the US"
I hope that he also goes after the woman who previously owned the house for making a false report causing him to be arrested.
It should be the police or city that pursues such justice. He can file a civil suit once the facts are established.
@@johngalt97 The facts have already been established by his arrest
@@fleebee3639 There needs to be further ties between the call and the consequences before a civil suit against the caller will prevail.
@@johngalt97 The ties is established when the previous owner suddenly shows up with a 27 years old title deed and claims that the current owner is trespassing. Do you walk around with your title deed?
@@sleepyearth You may have to now.
The previous owner was allowed to get away with filing a false police report. Corrupt town.
What’s hilarious to me, is that people seem to think because the police have a “difficult job” that is any kind of excuse for doing that job poorly.
Right? I'm a nurse, which is a difficult job, but people wouldn't be quiet if I started tranquilizing people with overdoses because they were too rowdy... 😳 Rather that gets you on an episode of nurses who kill on Netflix.
The previous owner basically swatted the poor guy. Funny how they say your DL does not prove anything, but the first thing an officer wants during an interaction is the drivers license.
They weren't interested in running him for warrants at that time and a DL would've interfered with their ability to bully citizens
One thing I like about Missouri is, in order to get your driver's license you will have to show 30 day recent mail to were you live.👍
Sounds like a 10 minute investigation into county records could've cleared it up. Just like normal, we pay, and very handsomely, public officials to do a job, but dont do it :/
10 minutes is generous unless they are typing with one hand behind their backs. Property tax records are publicly accessible.
@@ygrittesnow1701where you live must be screwed up. I can find all my property information in less than ten minutes with my phone.
Ten minutes? Eight of those are for making a snack first. The rest is for one-finger typing. The results are nearly instantaneous.
I was having a new electric line put on a house and needed okay from Ohio Edison. When I gave them the serial number I was suddenly sent to their fraud department. After telling him I recently bought the property, I was put on hold for a few minutes. The guy came back on and gave the okay. I'm sure he looked up the property and saw I was telling the truth.
How many people walk around with the deed to their home to prove, on demand, that you own the home??? That should have been their first red flag.
COPS MESSED UP AND VIOLATED THIS GUYS CIVIL RIGHTS! THEY SHOULD BE FIRED NEVER TO BE COPS AGAIN.
Qualified immunity. Which is why the government always settles these case once they lose the initial trial. No government law enforcement at any level wants qualified immunity be examined.
Cannot take your comment seriously without addressing the former home owner as well.
I loved the comedic part where the man "tried to reason with" police officers. That's hilarious.
His first mistake was assuming that cops possess critical thinking skills
Yeah haha
@@ianbattles7290Critical thinking skills? 😂 you’re the first to call them
You mean cops. There is a difference between a police officer and a cop. A police officer is courteous and serves the public. A cop is a thug with a gun and badge.
You can never reason with fools.
The person that lied about owning the home and showing a no longer valid deed should be prosecuted.
You can pull up ownership history in less than 1 minute by accessing the property appraisers website on your phone.......it would even have a copy of the foreclosure order and your purchase date
I think that the former owner should also be facing a lawsuit and possibly criminal charges for filing a false complaint.
This is exactly why our most powerful weapon against tyrannical cops is a calm attitude and a camera
I'm very happy that the Prince George's County police were kind enough to buy Mr. Tubo's new house for him. Most generous.
PPL.!!! LAWYER FEES! 40%
He paid $385,000 for it (from Maryland's SDAT site). His settlement doesn't pay it off.
Th Prince George’s County Police paid nothing. Prince George’s county taxpayers paid for the police misconduct.
@@jilbertb If I were his attorney I'd be going after the woman who filed the false complaint as well. This probably isnt over.
@@NScherdin Lawyers do not go after empty pockets in civil cases.
If we don't prosecute false police reports, more bad stuff will happen. People, and the police, need to held accountable for their actions.
When police are able to lie and people are not, they can never be trusted.
Making a false police report should result in the maximum sentence that the person reported on would have gotten.
Thanks to those incompetent gang members this gentleman will be able to pay or remodel his home he just bought.
Woman who gave false police report should be arrested and charged. The new owner of the house could have been shot or killed by the police.
You're right. The previous owner who SWATted him should be charged with filing a false police report and probably a whole list of other things related to deliberately abusing the police to harass the new owner. Hopefully the new owner gets a judgement paid before the previous owner begins their prison sentence.
If you think police is dumb , just listen to this, I took my grand son to a public Park, while sitting watching , two [police car drone upon the park going a 100 miles per hour, They jump out with weapon in hand, They pull their weapons out on a 6 week old baby, crying next to his young mother, The people start yelling put you weapon down that a baby, the police turn and told the people they fear for office safety, They thought the 6 week old baby was going to attack them, both cops weighted 220 pound with guns, billy club ,Mace, and other weapon plus back up , yet fear a 6 week old baby, This is police in America, Big ego and low IQ
@@jimmiehouse7736 That is just... insane. Both those officers should have been fired.
Let's implement more accountability laws. If the police wrongly arrests law-abiding citizens, they should be the ones who pay the damage, not taxpayers. And they should be stripped off all bonuses and wages for a significant period of time and are made to do community works. That way, there will be no more police brutality. I see lots of police today are merely thugs in uniform.
The county lawyer who argued in front of an American judge that the plaintiff had to prove his innocence to the police should probably no longer be a lawyer.
SWATting should result in banishing the SWATter from the country for life.
They basically bought his new home for him. Smart and intelligent.
The former homeowner should also be fined for perjury & filing a false police report and placed in jail for just as she had the new owner because in fact she was trespassing on his property.
Those officers should be fired now that is insane
Fired out of a cannon.
Arrested would be my choice.
The People should have Regulations and Ways to both PUNISH and FORCE a Cop to be Fired. And even so far as having the POWER to Disbar an Officer from EVER being work in the Security and Governmental Sector.
I would love to hear later if the former owner was ever charged with filing a false police report
Good question. It seems that police are all too willing to lay charges against you for absolutely trivial, needless, made up or even wrong reasons at times, but it seems few and far between that the perpetrators or instigators of these sorts of things get charged.
That would mean admitting the cops were wrong, so not going to happen.
I would love to hear that dumb cops did basic research before arresting people.
Exactly!
Previous owners has White Privileges 🙄 so police will never see any wrong doing on their parts🤦👎👎
The way you go over matters in fine detail is beautiful. I cannot forget. Thanks Lehto!
Shouldn't the former owner be charged for filing a false police report?
In cases like this these officers need to be FIRED, ARRESTED and thrown into jail for abuses like this.
Now I know I need to carry the deed to my house with me whenever I’m at home. Thanks for the tip.
They will dismiss it as a fake.
@@flitsertheo unless it's really old, in which case they will believe it over anything or anyone providing more recent info.
Don't forget your birth certificate and past bills, because your Driver's license won't cut it.
The previous owner should be charged for making false accusations.
Yea! He should sue each cop, all the county officials and their lawyers.
They should have charged the woman with filing a false report, and he should be able to sue her too. I'm wondering if she was friends with any of the cops considering they instantly took her side and didn't arrest her right away when they found out she lied.
I grew up next door to Prince Georges County and I gotta say, I am so NOT shocked by this. Can't remember how many times the DoJ investigated that police dept.
I've lived all around Maryland and PG county has the worst PD, even worse than Baltimore and Annapolis.
True, unfortunately. So much corruption all around but it’s getting better. I work for the school system and once asked coworkers the name of the county commissioner who went to jail and they asked which one. (It was the one who was flushing money down the toilet and having his wife stuff money in her bra when the FBI were at their door.)
@@rwberger6 Lived in MD decades ago. They always had a bad rep.
If they had been properly trained....So that they could think for themselves? Good luck with that.
Definitely filing a false report on the previous owner and definite lawsuit against him/her. All this obviously started with someone who couldn't make their payments and was bitter. Finding documentation online isn't that hard. Tax records, PVA records. Something that could have been easily found while on the scene BEFORE taking someone's rights away. I see so much wrong in this scenario.
It's amazing how many problems we Americans don't think are important because they haven't happened to us... yet.
It's a worldwide phenomenon, believe me.
They are just blind, dense, or simply not aware of how global this is. Many on rebelnews yt channel...keep saying I am glad I don't live in Canada. I always tell them it's happening here in the US and give them an example.
Back the blue till it happens to you !
Such as the attempted murder most vehicle "accidents" are? I was once hit by a broad while sitting still. 83 feet of skidmarks and she still hit me at about 45mph. In a 35 mph zone. She was charged with "following too closely".
🎯 That’s why the greatest threat to our freedom and Constitution (police) are still blindly supported by so many. Ironically, it’s people that genuinely hold freedom and the Constitution in high regard.
Law enforcement is out of control! Without any oversight or accountability
Agreed, not just them either. Those who have the ability to make them face consequences also don't do their job either. The entire system needs to be fixed, it's clear it doesn't work properly as it is. I think anyone working for the government, especially police, who knowingly use/abuse that power against someone needs to go to jail and never be able to have a state/government job again. Why even try to risk it happening again by keeping them? It's pretty bad when fast food chains have higher standards than police.
@@Stealth86651 correct. And in a world where people don't trust the legal system, people may be inclined to take action on their own.
But if you ask most people....they still trust the police and that just blow my mind.
A man or woman who has gone through 3.5 months of school can take away my freedom, legally lie to me, and/or shoot and kill me. Did I mention how to cut hair in my state takes 1.5 years ? Cutting hair 1.5 years vs carrying a badge and a gun 3.5 months. Even Stevie Wonder could see the problem with this.
And whose fault is that? The majority of Americans want this type of law enforcement. If we didn't, the majority would demand something better. Black folks been telling us that for years.
Quick! Spend more money!
You run an excellent series. It makes sense without sensationalism. Thanks!
The previous owner should be prosecuted to the fullest extend of the law. The owner should be able sued also.
And police wonder why they are hated by a large portion of the community.
And growing...
And every day, they help grow the divide and wonder why they are hated.
$300,000 seems to be an insufficient award in my opinion, no?
Depends, maybe there a 300K boost is most of the way to a new house. Too many places in Cali that’s only a driveway with a shack
It's not like they tossed him behind bars for a week. This was over pretty quickly. I'm surprised the award was that high. I hope he sues her now.
All the videos on this channel are very well explained, detailed and worthwhile to listen to. And the cases are often so outrageous that it gives some perspective to the disputes we have here in England and makes me feel better about living here!
And cops wonder why PEOPLE HATE THEM.
My next door neighbor tried to do this to me. His mother sold me the house. The Sheriff's deputies that responded did check with the County Assessor's office and verified my ownership. It was quick and easy for them.
Did the neighbor face any consequences for the false report?
homes hold a lot of emotional attachment, especially when you lose it against your wishes.
@@Blue-hf7xt 27 year old deed. I'm guessing property taxes were the reason.
@@robertsmith2956 government has and probably still doing this...double triple property taxes and force owners out.
@@Blue-hf7xt City stole my black bosses daughters home to give to his croanies. ACLU could care less since the mayor doing it was black.
Only cops can be found guilty of felonies and never spend a day in prison.
Abolishing qualified/absolute immunity is the only right first step towards accountability and constitutional based policing.
Tell the Supreme Court that. They gave us qualified immunity in 1967.
That is the interesting thing. QI does not protect from criminal acts. DA's use this as an excuse not to prosecute. And bad judges will support this unlawful unethical conduct.
Cop and corporations. Cop commits a felony, qualified immunity. Corporation commits a felony, maybe a fine.
While like the way you think, that is not the case here. The cops were acting in their roles as police. That they were wrong is secondary. The Supreme Court has said repeatedly that a government official doing their job can not be held liable. Because if they were held liable for their acts, then they could be threatened to be sued into oblivion. Not just cops, but building inspectors, traffic court cashiers, and street and sanitation workers. Thus comes "qualified immunity".
The SC has also said that qualified immunity does not apply when it is clear that a reasonable person would know that activity is wrong. (see TAYLOR v. RIOJAS, ET AL. SC, 2020, prison guards lost qualified immunity because they should have known that putting a prisoner in an unheated cell, unclothed, with no running water, and feces on the wall and floor violated the 8th Amendment)
Qualified immunity is a necessary aspect of any government official to do their job without fear of being sued personally.
The problem is that the courts have forgotten the word qualified and give them absolute immunity. The recent ruling by the fourth circuit may now have set a new precedent that can be referred to.
Previous owner guilty of making a false 911 call
That $300K should come out of the cops rather than the county
"The most dangerous thing in life is an incompetent that has been given a gun and a law enforcement badge."
- Steven Magee
A policy enforcement badge
Definition of a cop
There's way too many cops that don't know basic commonsense laws. Like trespass, ID, interference laws
They do know. They just have no reason to care.
This wasn't even a case of not knowing the law. This was about some racist cops who were too lazy (or too racist) to do a basic internet search.
@@rowynnecrowley1689 objection, (wanton) speculation.
Ignorance of law excuses no one.
@@roflchopter11 "Go back to where you came from" also we're not in court?
Sounds like somebody should of been charged with making a false police report. Could of the county only went after him to run out the clock on filling a false police report
I hope he sued the former owner too.
This is what makes me so very angry, that the officers broke the law, that they ignored the law and that they were terrible humans beings yet are still employed as police. We need to fire and blacklist this type of employees.
sounds great but there would be very few cops left as most cops act like this
@@johnwilson6707doesn’t matter, we don’t want cops that act like this, maybe if there are some consequences for their actions others will think twice but this, just let’s them know they can do whatever they want and get away with it
300k? I wish cop did that to me
You would think the town would fire them because they just proved to be a liability to that same town.
Yes!
It's crazy that police can arrest someone who steals from your house but will not do anything about someone who steals your house.
Thank you from Ireland. We lost our self built house. The Police are forced by the council to get property, even when the Police have been called for 15 years to violence and intimidation. They allowed the developers to grab 50A in lieu of house taken by NAMA, 49A. Not ours. We were told we would be arrested if we stayed. His younger brother was forced to register house as his. Council knowingly paid the wrong brother. They allowed the IRA developers steal our house.
His brother then committed suicide at 49.
That’s why we have a second amendment In the Constitution
@@dickgozinya1615 I don't quite get how the second amendment is relevant to such a case, maybe you can elaborate. I have just re-read it just in case I was missing something but I still don't see how it would apply.
Could it be some other amendment you meant to refer to? I'm assuming, possibly incorrectly, that you are referring to the United States constitution.
@@listerdave1240 the police are not here to protect or serve you that’s just propaganda the Supreme Court ruled on that like 20’years ago the second amendment guarantees you the right to bare arms thus allowing you to defend yourself and your property if squatters take over your house and the cops won’t help you because of reasons then it’s up to you handle your business and get a jury trial or ya could go another route and just host a huge party at that location a party so huge that the “owners” are gonna get arrested that may work as well
I refer you all to the Castle doctrine law. The fact that those police forced him out of his own property is just one more bit of proof that America is not free
The previous owner should be arrested for fraud
whoever called in that false police report should be held liable for all that
Time to take the previous owner to court.
This is the same problem that gets so many police in trouble” WE GOT A CALL” 😢
I got put at gunpoint through a wooden fence in my own back yard, letting my brothers dog out. They’re reason “you look suspicious in that camo coat”. For context: I was wearing a hooded woodland print hunting jacket and the hood was down , standing on my back porch in a fenced yard at around 2am I had my arms crossed and was telling the dogs “hurry up it’s freezing”. After identifying myself and my brother yelling “ what the fuck is going on out there?!” From the house and him identifying me aswell (they had ran my ID so that wasn’t necessary). Rather than be like “sorry about that” they basically told me I shouldn’t wear camo basicaly ever because it’s suspicious. I live in the country it’s kind of normal to wear out here. This dude looked like he was a kid and shouldn’t have a car let alone badge or a gun. Almost thought some kid took their dads cruiser for a joyride just to fuck with me.
Should have sued the town. Cops not trained adequately.
file a complaint
Pride, police pride
I had my custom pickup painted matte black, because it looked cool and in 2000 it showed well at the Saturday morning Car Chat and Chew, at a local car friendly coffee shop.
I kept getting stopped for no reason. The 4th time I asked the cop why. His answer was "You look like your trying to hide something."
My reply was "Officer I have $40,000 in this truck, and $15,000 is paint and chrome. Where can I hide in broad daylight?"
No reply. He just handed back my license and walked away.
(Expletive deleted).
I would have asked those cops what law says I can't wear camo on my own property
Why is it, in so many of these police "encounters", a simple phone call is all that is necessary to clarify stories and avoid embarrassing everyone--*yet* the police fail to make those calls??? It's mystifying to me!!! 🤔
Because America is ThE bEsT cOuNtRy In ThE wOrLd.
I know, right? It's Investigative Techniques 101 stuff!
'Cause when they embarrass people- they like it.
That would assume that cops have the capacity to think for themselves. Extra phone call ?. Yes, but that means making the extra effort needed to press all those pesky buttons on the phone.
They didn't WANT to believe what they saw. The saw the email with the DEED but then THEY decided and Judged that it was FAKE. They want to be Judge and Jury.
They had everything they needed as proof, but they denied it.
Problem is no one is ever arrested for filing false report.
While I don’t believe that “no one is ever arrested” for filing false police reports, I do believe that not enough people are arrested, charged, and punished for making them. If that was the “standard”, I think false reports would happen much less often.
What I want to know is why the article didn't name the real criminal here, the woman who went into the police department and filed a false report? Why is there no accountability for her? I am delighted Mr. Tubo received a settlement from the county but is that disgusting woman really going to walk away like nothing happened after disrupting this man's life like that? She probably doesn't have any money worth pursuing seeing as the home was lost in foreclosure, but she needs to do some jail time.
Y'know what? if we could find the address, we can look up public records and find her ourselves. Isn't that what the hoard of public shaming internet gurus are about?
How many times do things like this have to happen before we can just charge the entire justice department with negligence for not having a legal consultant on staff for the officers to use? They have millions of dollars of tech for giving officers real time information about vehicle registration and warrants, but they can't hire a few paralegals to sit and answer the phones.
Take every dollar spent on all of these law suits and you could have an entire team of paralegals in a call center just waiting.
They do. It's called a city attorney.
Exactly. There should be a 24/7 attorney or paralegal staffed with live access to an officers bodycam to monitor interactions and ensure
rights and liberties are not infringed upon. Eventually it will happen, hopefully.
@@ronniebuck2691 And in more cases than not, City Attorney's are the bottom of the barrel.
The CA is often a lazy political patron who has no political ambition and if they did not graduate last in their class , they are often in the lowest 1% .
I would not take advice from a CA on a dare .
As for the DA , their business is high volume and high conviction rate , by any means necessary , the Constitution be damned .
The want one thing , and that is a state legislature seat and the fast track requires a high conviction rate .
Anything that impacts that conviction rate is a no go .
Besides , they will not risk upsetting the folks that cover for their habitual drunk driving and other indiscretions .
The real sad part about this Steve is the officers will never really faced any kind of discipline or get retrained on that issue. We need to stop qualified immunity to officers like this we need officers to pay malpractice insurance just like doctors do that way where they get sued enough times they can no longer afford the insurance to be an officer.
the insurance should come through the police union they need to pay for the bad policing they have protected for too many years
BRILLIANT!!!!!!
I agree, but also raise the base pay and insurance benefits.
If we ONLY raise the risk, then everybody is disincentivised.
But if we raise the risk AND the reward, then we keep the good people incentivised and weed out the bad people. Increasing risk multiplicatively naturally increases the risk for those who act riskily more than it does for those who act safely.
And one facet of safety is being up to date on training - knowing current procedures thoroughly allows the procedures to protect you. Another facet is remaining calm and collected, even in intense situations - this prevents hasty and brash decisions. Another facet is information gathering - the more information you have the less likely you are to make an uninformed decision.
Right now there is too little risk for those cops who choose to act riskily (power trip, inconsiderate, lacking information, etc) to weed them out. But there is also too little incentive to bring people into the police force if the risk is increased. We need to raise incentives (most likely through base pay) and increase the risk in bad behavior (disincentivising bad behavior - ie: severely restrict qualified immunity - cops should know the laws they enforce - or malpractice insurance and lawsuits, etc).
The real sad part of this? The property was a foreclosure. And to foreclose on a property, the mortgage holder has to get approval from the county Clerk of Court's office. The Clerk of Court would have approved the sale. No attorney would do this who operates in that county, but I'd push to subpoena the Clerk of Court to testify at the hearing. That alone would probably have added another zero to the settlement. Because something like that would then get news coverage. I can just imagine the county's legal defense responding with, "I have no questions for this witness your honor."
It takes ten times as much information to change your mind as it did to make up your mind in the first place.
Thank you for sharing this information with us
You can be certain that this was just one of many abuses by these tyrants! You can't prove anything to someone that is determined not to be convinced. Do they train their cops to be obtuse?
Yes.
Some are genetically predisposed to be anal sphincters.
Thinking of making a t-shirt that says, "You can educate an ignorant person. You can't teach a stubborn fool."
Obtuse? You think you're smarter than me!?!?!
@@vicktorpatriot1430 🤣🤣🤣
The previous owner whom obviously lied and knew that home no longer belonged to them should be in jail.
That's another case when the police officers don't investigate what they should! I recommend a lawsuit!
One of the tragedies here is that it took over two years to win the case. I bet after attorneys fees there was not much left of the 300k, no mention of punitive damages.
True that, this type of situation should be under a fast docket 90 days
Old retired lawyer here in NC salutes you for the fascinating narratives. You're loquacious, a brain, and have a great sense of humor. Thanks.
he is a brain. Perhaps he's even a loquacious brain :D (brain in a jar) or maybe a Boltzmann brain, formed spontaneously to entertain the masses of us.
Loquacious? You're a lawyer all right!
He reads news articles almost word for word...
indubitably
@@ROGER2095Loquacious: vocabulary word of the day.
Nice to hear a supervisor willing to supervise. And many officers always fear everyone is trying to kill them, because that is their cowardice training.
Not to mention that if their boss could look up online and verify that he owned it they could have too or at least called their dispatch to have somebody look it up at headquarters...
Anyone demanding you leave your home is a threat to your life and should be treated as such.
Agree, but they are the ones carrying guns.
Its your only true safe haven.
Has she been charged with falsifying a police report