I don’t want a $100,000 EV half-ton. I want a $28,000 EV Maverick. Doesn’t need tech in it. Just needs to go 200 miles/charge, have AC, a good radio, cruise controls, and be cheap.
For what it’s worth they do have a hybrid maverick that can tow 4000 pounds for around 28,000. Not Exactly what you’re looking for, but it’s a good start.
I would tweak that slightly by adding Apple Car Play, but Almost no tech whatsoever. My daily runner is a Chevy Spark (a real man can admit this in public) and the dash is the simplest thing I've seen for sale in the last 25 years. I want to be able to plug my phone in. That's it. They stopped making it 3 years ago.
I'm so jealous. Good on you. I've had my eye on it for years and it's a special kind of torture to have it finally release while not being able to afford it.
@@richardgunn796easy math. It’s ~200 kWh to charge up. Residential elec rates differ widely, from less than $0.10/kWh to more than $0.30/kWh. not sure what Tesla superchargers charge…? But let’s say 20 cents per kWh x 200 kWh… that’s 40 bucks.
Any truck that costs $100,000 is a ridiculous product. There isn’t a single working man who can afford a $100,000 truck. When is someone going to produce a truck that normal working men can afford? It doesn’t have to be anything special-just put together well with an AM-FM radio and AC, and that’s all. None of these so-called 'features' matter to anyone who works a labor-intensive job. The manufacturers are absolutely, without a doubt, disconnected from reality from what people want or need.
99% of Americans that drive a truck has never hauled anything in the bed other than their groceries. Guaranteed. Everyone buys a truck because it's just an American thing to do. It stands for the honest working man.
I mean I don't know if this is somebody that doesn't actually live in this country but 95% of the trucks you see on the road don't actually belong to Marlboro Man. They are no different than their wives that buy a range Rover and only go to Starbucks. They aren't hauling anything they are doing "man shyt" lol doesn't matter how many flags they put on the back of it.
If you are a business owner you can deduct like 40-50% of the cost because of the ev credits and the "large vehicle" credits then you are st a "more reasonable" 50kish
I know I'm the exception but I almost never listen to music while driving except on long trips. It's one of the few places where I can have some quiet time with my thoughts. At least until someone with 500 watts of bass pulls up next to me at the light. 😳
The sound system is solid! It's certainly not a class leader, but it's on par with other premium pickup trucks I've tested (Toyota Tundra Capstone, RAM 1500 Tungsten, Colorado ZR2, etc.) Hope this helps! - Miles
Two things: 1. The range on this is why I could never buy a Cybertruck. Tesla is charging you the premium price, but refusing to put enough battery in it to give the range it needs (and that they promised). 2. You didn't mention one HUGE thing about charging: the location of the charge port is the same as that of all of the Teslas, so when it goes to a Tesla supercharger, it doesn't need to take up two spaces to charge!
Cybertruck in 3 years will look like a bad joke. After u see a few in person u realize its just flat out ugly asl. Plus they always look dirty af with the stainless steel. So ugly
@@G82Watts People who don't like the stainless are wrapping them. If you can afford a $100k or $120K truck you can buy any warp you like. I hope your right. I would like one CHEAP!
12:15 Seeing Marques with some grey in his beard made me realize how fast time flies and how far technology has come. I’ve been watching since 2016-amazing!
@@Mouwcat I realize GM's not leading in the battery chemistry area. Power density is a little light and I'd like to see how well they age after a few charge/discharge cycles. I'd also like to see how fast they take a charge in optimum conditions on a L3 Tesla supercharger, compared to a Tesla. Guessing it'd be slower. I know very little about GM's battery management (heating, cooling, preconditioning, identifying weak/failing cells etc).
@@stevebentley4516 As do most EV manufacturers...except Tesla. Can't say on the chinese cars (BYD etc) as they're heavily subsidized by their gov't. But I'll give GM credit for the work they're doing. Long way to go to make it really practical though.
I'm willing to bet if he recorded using 5 different devices you couldn't pick which was the iphone. Same with expensive wines. $50 bottle vs $500 bottle. It's 90% hype.
Does anyone else think that the iPhone 16 is washing out Marques' face a bit? The Pixel made his face look better even though it was really shifting colors and brightness a lot...
Could have lock the white balance so it doesn’t have to adjust every time he gets in and out the the car. What surprised me is that he said he could not go to ultra wide when filming on the main camera. Is this something they removed?!?
I picked mine up over a month ago. I friggin' love it. My first EV vehicle. The button to open and close the front trunk is in the grill just left of center (your right) of the truck. It took me a while to find it too. It doesn't have a sport mode but it does have a WOW mode for fast sprints.
Chevy is low key crushing the EV game. Everything from used Bolts ~$15k to $100K+ trucks. I've had a 2017 Bolt since 2020. Drives great. Great sound system. Averaging 3.5-4.0 miles/kw easy. 99% home charging on simple 120v outlet. I have 2 kids now and it's been simply worry-free. Absolutely perfect daily driver. 220+ miles range (newer 66 kw battery). Only downside, for some, is the 50kw max charging rate.
@@InuranusBrokoffYeah, you can get a 2021 Model 3 for 18k after tax credits right now. That gives you 5 miles per kWh, much more space than the Bolt, and 250kw charging, as well as access to Supercharger network. They’re surprisingly fun to drive. The cheapest Tesla is still about as fast as a Porsche Boxster or an eco boost Mustang with the performance package.
@@InuranusBrokoff Not for cheap EVs Used Model 3s are basically $10k more than a used Chevy Bolt. You can argue it's worth that much more, but I would argue that a Bolt with 225-250+ miles of range for $15k is the best deal for any EV ever. Even if you're making $100-$120k per year, you should not be justifying car purchases in the $40k price range. So new Teslas are really not justified for you. Unless it's a really cool car, like a sports car type thing, there is no reason to buy a luxury-priced vehicle unless you're making at least around 160k USD/year. Entirely dependent on what COL area you live in though. $160k in NYC absolutely does not justify buying a nice car (though, owning any car in NYC is stupid). Like I don't want some shitty, bottom of the line, used Tesla when it's still going to cost me $25,000. If I'm going to buy some shitty, bottom of the line, used EV $15,000 is WAY more justifiable.
@@johnmalone4101 Our electric rate is $.13/kw so empty to full is $26. Way cheaper than the Ram 2500 I had before that went the same distance on a tank but cost $90 to fill up.
@@SnappyWasHere I mean, a Ram 2500 (depending on equipped powertrain) has +50% towing capacity, +100% payload capacity, and can match or exceed that distance with a load behind it. So they aren't exactly comparable platforms. But you must not have needed those things, so it's still an economical upgrade in your case.
@@SnappyWasHere For now and depending on location. In some states the lowest rate is $0.26kWh, so double which is still not bad. Problem is electricity rates are controlled much more by local politicians than gas and oil. Enjoy the cheap ride now, but in the future everyone will regret this switch from a price standpoint. Also understand that $0.13/kWh is the equivalent of paying $4.38 per gallon based on energy purchased. 33.7 kWh's of energy in a gallon of gas, 40 in a gallon of diesel.
Marques, to open the FRUNK from the outside, there should be a touchpad at the right center of the front fascia. Check it out and let me know. You'll need to have the key fob within 3ft of the vehicle.
Stunning to me they didn’t just build NACS (J3400) right into the vehicle. With the vehicle release so close to Supercharger access, should have jumped in with both feet. I suspect it’d be better to buy Gen 2 when it’s converted over to the new standard.
NACS would have been nicer, but using an adapter is not a big deal tho. And currently you can only charge at the full 350 kW power on CCS DC fast chargers (Tesla Superchargers are underpowered for this).
@@mezzbas a Cybertruck owner we all have our flavors. I don’t disrespect the Chevy, but I am a Tesla guy. Tesla is an innovative company, some people like that and others don’t.
The styling is pretty cool. Kind of reminds me of 90's Japanese car makers trying to make their cars more masculine and beefier for the American market, by making the bumpers way bigger. Very fun styling. 100,000$ is pure comedy for a truck, but it's neat.
Some fun numbers: 205 kWh is 738 MJ. The two A1B nuclear reactors on the Gerald Ford class 100 kiloton supercarriers produce 125 MW of electricity each. So the US Navy's newest aircraft carrier can produce 1 Silverado EV worth of charge every 3 seconds.
expat in the UK here...This aerodynamic shape actually resembles a lot of the Toyota/Ford truck designs here which they need to have because of the emissions requirements. good to see it in the US finally.
Curb weight is 8000 lbs which is right around the F250 and F350 diesel trucks which are everywhere. That doesn't factor into my buying decision whatsoever especially with the crazy range
@@Yielar1 Some states charge increased registration fees or outright put you in a new class above certain weights (Illinois puts cyber trucks in C truck tier, while pretty much every normal passenger truck is B)
I had an interesting take on this truck. I am a Rivian R1T owner, but had one of these for a 2k mile road trip. First I will say, this thing really does get range for days! So much starting range! But thats where my love affair ended.... I was never able to get more then 180Kwh out of any chargers and I mean dozens of chargers most rated to 350Kwh. I averaged around 140-160Kwh while charging. Not bad and palatable in most vehicles... But in this vehicle... Where I was averaging 1.6M/Kwh @75 MPH on all seasons, not AT's I had to spend A TON of time charging. Im sure if you can get this thing up to 300Kwh while charging this will be a super impressive vehicle, but with todays charging infra this truck is only impressive for road tripping when road tripping is within 450 miles of your house. Chevy also REALLY needs to figure out how to rate the ac in the cabin while charging with todays software it automatically derates the charging curve to keep the cabin cool, meaning I had to spend an hour and a half in a Walmart 6 times because with the AC turned on and set to 62 with it being 91 outside, it derated to 75Kwh.... My Rivian on public charging tends towards the same 150-200Kwh and does get more rarely, but the battery is near half the size and even on All Terrain's at 75 mph I am seeing 1.9 M/Kwh, on all seasons I see 2.1 m/kwh which means the miles go further and im charging less. This truck would be Steller if the charging infra was actually there to support it. Also I have to say... After 2k miles I had a TON of rattles, all on-road, is that just GM quality these days?
When you get a press car from the manufacturer, you have to agree to review it exactly the way they want. Otherwise you won't get future press cars. It's called "access journalism" & it's how nearly all TH-cam car reviewers operate
I have a family member that gets cars like this, drives them for two years, and has another new car/truck. Probably leasing but damn, it can cost a lot to do it like that.
An early interview with a Chevy engineer, she said "Avalan...Silverado!" So even they know, lol! I think most agree it was done for name recognition alone.
It's certainly more of a spiritual Avalanche successor. But I think the naming was a more of a marketing move. The Mustang Mach-E isn't really a mustang at all. But that name gave it better brand recognition.
12:24 Exactly... and exactly why I would never own one. Good job, Chevy. I'm not a fan of the glass roof, so I'd love a trim without one, but that range... very nice.
Also hate glass roofs. Porsche is the only I’ve seen to option it out. Terrible insulator, great conductor of heat, rock chips/breaks, and when I want to look outside I get out.
@@ChristopherStandardTime I feel like this is less of an issue than you're imagining. Unless you live in a area with notorious large hail storms, I doubt it would be that big a deal. How often do rock chips even damage your wind shield? And that's literally just perpendicular to the road? Glass roofs are exposed to basically zero rock chips.
Top of the line gas Silverados are well into the 80k range. 10k premium doesn’t seem that far off. I’m sure they’ll have versions that cost significantly less
Thank you. For my use the Bolt EV is the best. Heated seats & steering wheel, aggressive one pedal regen, leather seats, size very near the Honda Fit my wife loved, but is sadly not made anymore. And to top it off, though we do not have a huge battery we can get 5 m/kWh. All for 1/3 the price of this Silverado. The Bolt is coming back for 2026.
Ty, nice review. I own the lightning, and love it a lot. recently got the CT and today is getting the FSD. So happy with it. IMHO no FSD, no Go, specially for daily and long drives too. The Silverado would have been my go to, for range, looks and space, and power, however, No FSD makes it no go for me. Ty MKBHD
I like that they brought back the avalanche body form. I used to have an older style Ridgeline, and we always liked the style. Definitely the nicest looking ev truck.
Thanks for your review of the Silverado EV..I own a Tesla and we just got a diesel Silverado 1500 that gets 30mpg and is very quiet.I was curious to see how the Silverado EV compares to the other EV trucks out there looks very good and love that range on the truck wish I could convince my husband to go all EV maybe in the future we will.
There is a lot to hate (price, weight, no CarPlay, ect) but it's an earnest effort from GM and that is all you can really ask for at this point in the EV revolution..
I love it. as a lover of GM, I am very happy to see this creation. But as a Cybertruck owner, its just so much more than a truck and range has not been an issue for me in any way. I have also driven it cross country. Maybe once im tired of my Cybertruck, ill get into one of these.
@@danharold3087 As of Feb 2024 iPhone had a 60.77% market share, that’s one seriously expensive dime they’re shaving off. If there’s one thing you don’t want to do it’s have >60% of your potential audience look at all the effort you’ve put in only to think twice because their comms device doesn’t work natively with it.
The extra hp, is seen vital to tech bros that don't know shit about vehicles. The fact that Chevy decided to actually focus on the general user of this vehicle shows they know what they are doing. The tech bros can have their fast launching Rivians and Tesla's that is cool for about 5 minutes.
MKB Awesome Video I'm glad you made this I had a beautiful truck pull up on the side of me Nice Color and thanks to your Video I now know what it was.Thanks for sharing.💯✌️
I think with a more modern battery chemistry and some cutdowns on weight here and there, it could go under 3 tons...and actually be a bit more feasable. Also wouldn't like to be a brake pad in it!
Not really it's in the neighborhood of your 1 ton and above trucks. That said this it is a lot of weight for a 1/2 ton truck so definitely reconsider driving it on soft ground.
A thing of beauty. When I get mine, I will use the front to add more batteries. That way, I will be able to charge it where I am. But I’m an electrical engineer, so I can do this without messing with the truck’s warranty.
I work at the Spring Hill EV plant and they currently build the LYRIQ. It and the Acura ZDX both use the same batteries and amount of cells. Each car gets 12 cells, I believe the Silverado gets double the amount of cells to around 24 per battery. So the range isn't shocking honestly.
@@JMilMoviesEVs never fully turn off either. There’s always a computer running in the background listening for a command. My Model 3 loses about 3-5 miles a day due to this background activity.
I think it looks pretty crappy at times... Lots of times where it looks like the lens is dirty, and the scene is washed out, but you know he wouldn't skip on that. Other times it looks totally fine. Like at 7:02 it goes from looking fine outside to looking like sh1t around the screens.
It's tough to use a truck for work when the payload is limited to just 1,000 pounds. In construction, you typically need a payload capacity of 1,500 to 2,500 pounds because materials are heavy.
@@minch5537 but when you need to use it for construction stuff it should be a good option. It’s 100k dollar truck that has the same cargo weight capacity of lots of medium size suvs. That is just odd.
Can't really call the Tesla a truck. It's completely non-functional as a truck; it loses 20% range when the tonneau is open because of the ridiculous shape. Because of the angles, you can't really throw anything in from the side, only from the rear. Which also makes it really difficult to even use the decent sized bed(anyone shorter than 6-0 can't reach anything mid/far back in bed without getting in the bed).
Your funny. The cybertruck get 10% more with the cover closed because it has the factory cover. The ridiculous shape makes that 10% possible. You will not see that improvement with other pickups. I have been hearing this " you can't really throw anything in from the side," from people who have never owned a 1/2 or 3/4 ton 4 wheel drive pickup. While you can "throw" things in, the boxes are too far up in the air to let you reach in and get stuff back out. I have a 1/2 K1500 and I can pick stuff up just along the box wall. I imagine if one has a 1/2 4WD from the F100 era you can reach in. I know the 1973 IH 4WD I used to drive was much lower.
@@danharold3087 it's "you're"...and, yes, I am. Only I speak in facts here, which is unfortunate for you Elon fanboys who can't admit when you've been bamboozled. Fact: the cyber truck is highly inefficient with the tonneau open. It's been tested, quite often, and proven to be a solid 15%, and up to 20% especially at speeds of more than 50 mph. Clearly you're not a real truck owner, or at least you're one of the truck owners who has never really used it as a truck. The standard large trucks you mentioned all have other means of getting into the beds from the side as well as the back. But, hey, you go on and keep telling yourself that it's a "truck" 😂
@@TheLearningCatalystCoach Lets get back to something we have sources for. Efficiencies. Cybertruck is the most efficent with the box closed. Only the Lightning is more efficient with the cybertruck box open. Using your 15% and the least efficient CyberTruck the 3 motor cyberbeast. 472×1.15 = 542.8 These are from out of spec motoring. All tested on the same loop at 70mph. Model Efficiency (Wh/mi) Range (miles) Battery Capacity (kWh) Cybertruck (Cyberbeast) 472 254 123 Ford F-150 Lightning 511 255 131 Rivian R1T 545 289 135 GMC Hummer EV 811 303 212 Silverado EV 3WT 588 329 203 Silverado EV RST 571 387 210+
![[LIVE] : ONE ลุมพินี 88 | คู่เอก "ป้อมเพชร vs อัสลามจอน"](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/1ZqTVVbMgbo/mqdefault.jpg)
I don’t want a $100,000 EV half-ton. I want a $28,000 EV Maverick. Doesn’t need tech in it. Just needs to go 200 miles/charge, have AC, a good radio, cruise controls, and be cheap.
And tows 60milees 😂
@@mcsike7264 People who want to tow start with a 1/2 ton and work their way up from there.
We will hopefully get there. 10 years ago there was only the 100k model S and X, regular price evs are hopefully right around the corner
For what it’s worth they do have a hybrid maverick that can tow 4000 pounds for around 28,000. Not Exactly what you’re looking for, but it’s a good start.
I would tweak that slightly by adding Apple Car Play, but Almost no tech whatsoever. My daily runner is a Chevy Spark (a real man can admit this in public) and the dash is the simplest thing I've seen for sale in the last 25 years. I want to be able to plug my phone in. That's it. They stopped making it 3 years ago.
Bad News: It's $100k
Good News: You can finance it for 20 years at a not so great interest rate.
Even better news: You can lease it
GM Financial saves the day once again!
There’s no way on Earth this vehicle will be functional in 20 years. I doubt it will last 10.
@nathanieladams7624 the truck itself will last 20. The battery on the other hand .... at 200kwh going to be 35k to replace at least ....
@@nathanieladams7624based on what? Your feelings?
the silverado ev on zillow has me dying 😂😂😂
11:05
@@WhatSmellsLikeToast 11:05
Labelling it as Avalanche, PA is hilarious! Cheeky move 😂
They cost as much as a home makes sense
😂😂😂😂😂😂
Ford guy all my life but since Ive gone EV I’ve really come to appreciate GM. I own a 23 Bolt and love it. Range Range Range damn the weight.
97 grand!! that's like 1,940 years of wallpaper.
Dam
😂😂😂😂😂
We got Marques to say "MKBHD here" again before we got GTA 6
Hahahahaha
W Miles
Lol😂
I had idea you had your own channel outside of AutoFocus! Subbed.
Honestly this is the dumbest meme.
I purchased a Sierra EV over the weekend and absolutely love it. For the slight extra cost over the silverado, it seems to have a MUCH nicer interior.
I'm so jealous. Good on you. I've had my eye on it for years and it's a special kind of torture to have it finally release while not being able to afford it.
I love the front end of that truck.
GMC knows how to do "busy" facias and "busy" tailgates. I always thought they looked better (and truckier) than the Silverado.
@@Truedoogie Get one used in a year or two.
And you didn't even have to put down an unrefundable deposit, nor was it trashed when you picked it up LOL
As someone who has had this vehicle for a little over a month... this thing is absolutely amazing
how much does it cost to charge to 100% in the US on this car?
@@richardgunn796 Same as the Hummer EV with the same battery size; can cost over $100 to recharge at a fast charging station.
@@richardgunn796 $28 to go 0-100% at 0.14 cents per kWh.
@@richardgunn796 A lot cheaper than gas. Especially if you're home charging or using a Tesla supercharger.
@@richardgunn796easy math. It’s ~200 kWh to charge up. Residential elec rates differ widely, from less than $0.10/kWh to more than $0.30/kWh. not sure what Tesla superchargers charge…? But let’s say 20 cents per kWh x 200 kWh… that’s 40 bucks.
Any truck that costs $100,000 is a ridiculous product. There isn’t a single working man who can afford a $100,000 truck. When is someone going to produce a truck that normal working men can afford? It doesn’t have to be anything special-just put together well with an AM-FM radio and AC, and that’s all. None of these so-called 'features' matter to anyone who works a labor-intensive job. The manufacturers are absolutely, without a doubt, disconnected from reality from what people want or need.
99% of Americans that drive a truck has never hauled anything in the bed other than their groceries. Guaranteed. Everyone buys a truck because it's just an American thing to do. It stands for the honest working man.
I mean I don't know if this is somebody that doesn't actually live in this country but 95% of the trucks you see on the road don't actually belong to Marlboro Man. They are no different than their wives that buy a range Rover and only go to Starbucks. They aren't hauling anything they are doing "man shyt" lol doesn't matter how many flags they put on the back of it.
@@JafarChouit's not 99 percent dude. I drive a bigger truck than this and haul shit almost everyday.
If you are a business owner you can deduct like 40-50% of the cost because of the ev credits and the "large vehicle" credits then you are st a "more reasonable" 50kish
It’s the boss’s truck
I resisted getting the RST edition of it and got the Work Truck version of it instead. Love the range. No bells and whistles though.
The best one in my opinion. Best range, the bi-charge, truck bed that opens to the cabin and expends to the rear door... fantastic
It's exactly the same thing as the Avalanche but on an EV chassis. You can remove the back window on a Avalanche and have it completely open.
I feel like you never talk about the sound systems in cars. For me, it's really important. It's what you do when driving, listening to music.
I saw Bose. Must sound good.
I totally agree. And in modern cars it's relatively difficult to upgrade, so it really matters a lot to me.
I know I'm the exception but I almost never listen to music while driving except on long trips. It's one of the few places where I can have some quiet time with my thoughts. At least until someone with 500 watts of bass pulls up next to me at the light. 😳
The sound system is solid! It's certainly not a class leader, but it's on par with other premium pickup trucks I've tested (Toyota Tundra Capstone, RAM 1500 Tungsten, Colorado ZR2, etc.) Hope this helps!
- Miles
Yeah he’s just a bad car reviewer
Two things:
1. The range on this is why I could never buy a Cybertruck. Tesla is charging you the premium price, but refusing to put enough battery in it to give the range it needs (and that they promised).
2. You didn't mention one HUGE thing about charging: the location of the charge port is the same as that of all of the Teslas, so when it goes to a Tesla supercharger, it doesn't need to take up two spaces to charge!
For people who tow large loads frequently this is the truck.
For the rest of truck buyers CyberTruck for the win.
Sales figures show it too.
@@danharold3087 No. The sales figures only reflect that the CyberDrek has been available longer. Give it a few years.
@@dontbanmebrodontbanme5403 it's also going to cost you twice as much to fill up since it has double the battery pack size
Cybertruck in 3 years will look like a bad joke. After u see a few in person u realize its just flat out ugly asl. Plus they always look dirty af with the stainless steel. So ugly
@@G82Watts People who don't like the stainless are wrapping them. If you can afford a $100k or $120K truck you can buy any warp you like.
I hope your right. I would like one CHEAP!
12:15 Seeing Marques with some grey in his beard made me realize how fast time flies and how far technology has come. I’ve been watching since 2016-amazing!
He’s 31
Chevrolet is somehow gonna figure out a way to have lifter issues in this truck too.
😂
🤣😭
Please do the equinox EV next. Actually cheap enough for people to afford and it's frickin sick. I got one last week and very happy.
i know looks are subjective but it is really ugly... especially at night, it looks like a 12year old designed that headlight
@@Shiinamusiclyricssubs it looks way better than most evs out there, check one out in-person if you haven't already
If only they had Apple CarPlay and android auto
@@quartzofcourseya instant disqualification.
Cheap??
They should’ve called it the avalanche
Omg ur right, missed opportunity. Avalanche just feels like an EV name too.
Would also suit it with how much of a boat that thing is
EValanche
EVlanche would actually be nice
Nah, it's a new truck all around even if it has some of the best features from the Avalanche. Impressive design overall
I like what GM's doing here but damn, that price. These manufacturers gotta do something to bring the sticker down...across the board.
I mean it’s kind of a given with the battery being 3 to 4 times the size of every other EV right now
Chevy still loses tens of thousands per EV...
@@JenniLudes with a weak battery chemistry they end up having to double the size of the battery pack to get decent range driving up the cost
@@Mouwcat I realize GM's not leading in the battery chemistry area. Power density is a little light and I'd like to see how well they age after a few charge/discharge cycles. I'd also like to see how fast they take a charge in optimum conditions on a L3 Tesla supercharger, compared to a Tesla. Guessing it'd be slower. I know very little about GM's battery management (heating, cooling, preconditioning, identifying weak/failing cells etc).
@@stevebentley4516 As do most EV manufacturers...except Tesla. Can't say on the chinese cars (BYD etc) as they're heavily subsidized by their gov't. But I'll give GM credit for the work they're doing. Long way to go to make it really practical though.
Bros beard has come a long way it's finally connecting. Congratulations 🎉.
Came for the iPhone footage, stayed for this beast. WoW! Well done Chevy 👏👏
I'm willing to bet if he recorded using 5 different devices you couldn't pick which was the iphone. Same with expensive wines. $50 bottle vs $500 bottle. It's 90% hype.
Does anyone else think that the iPhone 16 is washing out Marques' face a bit? The Pixel made his face look better even though it was really shifting colors and brightness a lot...
Washed out for sure! Lens flare in lots of shots. But still a real nice truck and solid review 👍
Yeah, it almost looks like the lens is dirty, but I know he wouldn't do that.
I was about to post the same thing! The whole video is washed out. Maybe some YT video setting is off? Basically, unwatchable... 🤷♂️
Could have lock the white balance so it doesn’t have to adjust every time he gets in and out the the car. What surprised me is that he said he could not go to ultra wide when filming on the main camera. Is this something they removed?!?
6:03 Omg Marques, you mean the Avalanche. Silverado's never had the mid-gate.
When range anxiety gets replaced by weight anxiety.
Those tires are going to feel it and get worn out
And/or price anxiety.
@@eyesc Like a 1 ton Silverado.....
Well, Americans let that ship sail quite a while back. But thanks for putting that out there.
@@kelviskelvis7140 Except the 1500 weighs 4500lbs and this weighs 9,000lbs and somehow tows 1,300lbs less lmao
I picked mine up over a month ago. I friggin' love it. My first EV vehicle. The button to open and close the front trunk is in the grill just left of center (your right) of the truck. It took me a while to find it too. It doesn't have a sport mode but it does have a WOW mode for fast sprints.
Chevy is low key crushing the EV game. Everything from used Bolts ~$15k to $100K+ trucks. I've had a 2017 Bolt since 2020. Drives great. Great sound system. Averaging 3.5-4.0 miles/kw easy. 99% home charging on simple 120v outlet. I have 2 kids now and it's been simply worry-free. Absolutely perfect daily driver. 220+ miles range (newer 66 kw battery). Only downside, for some, is the 50kw max charging rate.
A used bolt is a great value for a local commuter car. The 50kw max charging hampers for trips. That should get sorted with the next gen version.
Tesla is kind of crushing the EV game. 🤫
@@InuranusBrokoffYeah, you can get a 2021 Model 3 for 18k after tax credits right now. That gives you 5 miles per kWh, much more space than the Bolt, and 250kw charging, as well as access to Supercharger network.
They’re surprisingly fun to drive. The cheapest Tesla is still about as fast as a Porsche Boxster or an eco boost Mustang with the performance package.
@@InuranusBrokoff Not for cheap EVs
Used Model 3s are basically $10k more than a used Chevy Bolt. You can argue it's worth that much more, but I would argue that a Bolt with 225-250+ miles of range for $15k is the best deal for any EV ever.
Even if you're making $100-$120k per year, you should not be justifying car purchases in the $40k price range. So new Teslas are really not justified for you.
Unless it's a really cool car, like a sports car type thing, there is no reason to buy a luxury-priced vehicle unless you're making at least around 160k USD/year. Entirely dependent on what COL area you live in though. $160k in NYC absolutely does not justify buying a nice car (though, owning any car in NYC is stupid).
Like I don't want some shitty, bottom of the line, used Tesla when it's still going to cost me $25,000. If I'm going to buy some shitty, bottom of the line, used EV $15,000 is WAY more justifiable.
I love my Silverado EV. Real range is just as good as they said. It’s the range all EVs need. No way I could ever go back to a gas vehicle.
How much does it cost to charge that big battery pack?
@@johnmalone4101 Our electric rate is $.13/kw so empty to full is $26. Way cheaper than the Ram 2500 I had before that went the same distance on a tank but cost $90 to fill up.
What psi do you run the tyres at?
@@SnappyWasHere I mean, a Ram 2500 (depending on equipped powertrain) has +50% towing capacity, +100% payload capacity, and can match or exceed that distance with a load behind it. So they aren't exactly comparable platforms. But you must not have needed those things, so it's still an economical upgrade in your case.
@@SnappyWasHere For now and depending on location.
In some states the lowest rate is $0.26kWh, so double which is still not bad. Problem is electricity rates are controlled much more by local politicians than gas and oil. Enjoy the cheap ride now, but in the future everyone will regret this switch from a price standpoint.
Also understand that $0.13/kWh is the equivalent of paying $4.38 per gallon based on energy purchased. 33.7 kWh's of energy in a gallon of gas, 40 in a gallon of diesel.
Congrats on a million subs!!
Marques, to open the FRUNK from the outside, there should be a touchpad at the right center of the front fascia. Check it out and let me know. You'll need to have the key fob within 3ft of the vehicle.
I would buy an EV, if they weren't being systematically forced on society.
But does Silverado ev have hd wallpapers??
My god man let it fucking rest!!!!!!
💀
Yes! For $49.99 a year!
@@juanexjoNo.
@@juanexjono, wallpaper Saga continues
I believe there was a smudge on the camera lens…
Or the new iPhone 16 has a weird halo effect and contrast issues
it totally does. i didn't notice that till you said it
Stunning to me they didn’t just build NACS (J3400) right into the vehicle. With the vehicle release so close to Supercharger access, should have jumped in with both feet.
I suspect it’d be better to buy Gen 2 when it’s converted over to the new standard.
NACS would have been nicer, but using an adapter is not a big deal tho. And currently you can only charge at the full 350 kW power on CCS DC fast chargers (Tesla Superchargers are underpowered for this).
Damn that looks so good compared to other ev trucks well done Chevy
@@mezzbas a Cybertruck owner we all have our flavors. I don’t disrespect the Chevy, but I am a Tesla guy. Tesla is an innovative company, some people like that and others don’t.
@@mezzb"literally no need" bro don't speak on what you don't know 🤣
It's one of my favorite EV's so far. I pray to be in the position to purchase one in the near future
Looks sick.
You're gonna enjoy going electric mate!!
@@stephensullivan1011 which EV do you drive?
Puts the Lightening to shame ! Sweet pricey heavy truck ! They all are though ,,just part of the game right now ! Great review as always !
The styling is pretty cool. Kind of reminds me of 90's Japanese car makers trying to make their cars more masculine and beefier for the American market, by making the bumpers way bigger. Very fun styling. 100,000$ is pure comedy for a truck, but it's neat.
Polestar also doesn't have an ignition button and i do love that
Some fun numbers: 205 kWh is 738 MJ. The two A1B nuclear reactors on the Gerald Ford class 100 kiloton supercarriers produce 125 MW of electricity each. So the US Navy's newest aircraft carrier can produce 1 Silverado EV worth of charge every 3 seconds.
So I should get one of those reactors and never worry about changing again?
Hahhahahahahs I love this comment so damn much thank you
expat in the UK here...This aerodynamic shape actually resembles a lot of the Toyota/Ford truck designs here which they need to have because of the emissions requirements. good to see it in the US finally.
Thanks for all the info. Well done, I'm smitten with this full size Silverado EV.
That's one of the cleanest infotainment systems I've ever seen. Good UI, sleek hardware.
Denali Ultimate version and idk.... Id cop it
Was wondering if this truck still existed. Eager to hear about it.
Yeah, its huge. 8800lbs is wild. It's nice looking.
Curb weight is 8000 lbs which is right around the F250 and F350 diesel trucks which are everywhere. That doesn't factor into my buying decision whatsoever especially with the crazy range
@@Yielar1 Some states charge increased registration fees or outright put you in a new class above certain weights (Illinois puts cyber trucks in C truck tier, while pretty much every normal passenger truck is B)
@@Yielar1 Those trucks don't do 0-60 in 4.1 seconds. That's quick for a truck that weighs that much. Hope the brakes are really good.
It may ruin your driveway or garage floor over time.
Also wild is that the Aptera could probably go 2,000 miles on the same 200kW+ battery capacity.
Great looking truck. I drive a 2023 Chevy Bolt now and will probably up grade to the Silverado EV work truck. Love the range!
I had an interesting take on this truck. I am a Rivian R1T owner, but had one of these for a 2k mile road trip.
First I will say, this thing really does get range for days! So much starting range! But thats where my love affair ended.... I was never able to get more then 180Kwh out of any chargers and I mean dozens of chargers most rated to 350Kwh. I averaged around 140-160Kwh while charging. Not bad and palatable in most vehicles... But in this vehicle... Where I was averaging 1.6M/Kwh @75 MPH on all seasons, not AT's I had to spend A TON of time charging. Im sure if you can get this thing up to 300Kwh while charging this will be a super impressive vehicle, but with todays charging infra this truck is only impressive for road tripping when road tripping is within 450 miles of your house.
Chevy also REALLY needs to figure out how to rate the ac in the cabin while charging with todays software it automatically derates the charging curve to keep the cabin cool, meaning I had to spend an hour and a half in a Walmart 6 times because with the AC turned on and set to 62 with it being 91 outside, it derated to 75Kwh....
My Rivian on public charging tends towards the same 150-200Kwh and does get more rarely, but the battery is near half the size and even on All Terrain's at 75 mph I am seeing 1.9 M/Kwh, on all seasons I see 2.1 m/kwh which means the miles go further and im charging less. This truck would be Steller if the charging infra was actually there to support it. Also I have to say... After 2k miles I had a TON of rattles, all on-road, is that just GM quality these days?
Better yet, the GMC Sierra EV! A few thousand more, but a nicer interior and more bold styling.
No road review? How come?
When you get a press car from the manufacturer, you have to agree to review it exactly the way they want. Otherwise you won't get future press cars. It's called "access journalism" & it's how nearly all TH-cam car reviewers operate
@@sdsd4139cool.
Now why was not driving it part of the agreement. 😐
The RST is almost $150,000 with tax in Canada, truly rediculous for a 1/2 ton. I bet in 3 years it'll be worth $70,000.
Chevy the truth with the EVs. I'm driving the Blazer EV and I love it
Best automotive reviewer on YT!
I’m always shocked to see how much people are willing to spend on a car.
Most of those will be company cars.
But yeah people borrowing that much money on a depreciating asset is crazy
I have a family member that gets cars like this, drives them for two years, and has another new car/truck. Probably leasing but damn, it can cost a lot to do it like that.
And most of these people will still go on and on about the uptick in grocery prices.
@@matklmSo you think they are charging these in a company parking lot?
Same people spending $50/yr on phone wallpaper 😂
Some people have the money to burn and they enjoy it.
The fact that ‘Avalanche’ flew right over Chevys head is nuts.
An early interview with a Chevy engineer, she said "Avalan...Silverado!" So even they know, lol!
I think most agree it was done for name recognition alone.
Avalanche didn't sell, no point using the name of a product that didn't sell. Silverado is the vehicle that the company needs customers to buy.
I was going to say the same thing 😂😂 loved that thing as a kid and this reminded me of it immediately
It's certainly more of a spiritual Avalanche successor. But I think the naming was a more of a marketing move. The Mustang Mach-E isn't really a mustang at all. But that name gave it better brand recognition.
@@AutoFocus Definitely agree that Silverado had much more brand cache, but the silhouette is all Avalanche lol.
If they came out with an electric Suburban that would be sick. SubErban, you can have that one for free, Chevy.
There’s an escalade iq so technically give it a year or two its coming
It’s coming
This seems better than the Rivian R1T. Very impressive. It even has physical buttons. It also looks great as well. Real competition.
12:24 Exactly... and exactly why I would never own one.
Good job, Chevy. I'm not a fan of the glass roof, so I'd love a trim without one, but that range... very nice.
Also hate glass roofs. Porsche is the only I’ve seen to option it out. Terrible insulator, great conductor of heat, rock chips/breaks, and when I want to look outside I get out.
@@astrohgamingZero 100% agreed. I understand it's a selling point but glass up top is just begging for a massive repair bill.
@@ChristopherStandardTime I feel like this is less of an issue than you're imagining.
Unless you live in a area with notorious large hail storms, I doubt it would be that big a deal. How often do rock chips even damage your wind shield? And that's literally just perpendicular to the road? Glass roofs are exposed to basically zero rock chips.
iPhone 16 video processing be getting a little too HDRish. Like a little more contrast would have defenitely helped.
100k is missing the mark
Top of the line gas Silverados are well into the 80k range. 10k premium doesn’t seem that far off. I’m sure they’ll have versions that cost significantly less
I love when reviewers act so impressed with storage that comes in any truck these days. The real party trick is the mid gate.
That midgate on a much more modestly specced truck would convince that something could finally beat out my 25 year old ranger for usability.
@@ResonantFrequency Hopefully more modestly specked Chevy and GMCs come out soon.
Thank you. For my use the Bolt EV is the best. Heated seats & steering wheel, aggressive one pedal regen, leather seats, size very near the Honda Fit my wife loved, but is sadly not made anymore. And to top it off, though we do not have a huge battery we can get 5 m/kWh. All for 1/3 the price of this Silverado. The Bolt is coming back for 2026.
The mid gate and regen paddle are two things I’d be jealous of as a cybertruck owner.
"And I guess you could say the cybertruck is a full size electric pickup truck" lol
You could also say it's a complete freak show too and be equally honest.
My Mercedes EQS 450+ does 521 miles on 100% charge.
You missed the GMC Sierra Denali EV .. it’s available too
Missed? Basically the same thing
@@markplott4820 got one in driveway
@@jamesengland7461definitely not the same lol. GMC has more options and completely different styling.
I drive one too, so smooth and easy to drive and nice place to be inside
Ty, nice review. I own the lightning, and love it a lot. recently got the CT and today is getting the FSD. So happy with it. IMHO no FSD, no Go, specially for daily and long drives too. The Silverado would have been my go to, for range, looks and space, and power, however, No FSD makes it no go for me. Ty MKBHD
I like that they brought back the avalanche body form. I used to have an older style Ridgeline, and we always liked the style. Definitely the nicest looking ev truck.
Did anyone else notice a very slight lag in the video around the 0:43 second mark
Yes
Welcome to the world of iOS
Yea
This is not how you do it. Shoving a massive battery to make up for the range just adds WAY more inefficiency🤦♂️
Thanks for your review of the Silverado EV..I own a Tesla and we just got a diesel Silverado 1500 that gets 30mpg and is very quiet.I was curious to see how the Silverado EV compares to the other EV trucks out there looks very good and love that range on the truck wish I could convince my husband to go all EV maybe in the future we will.
I really like this. Love the range and even more so. Love the tesla station compatibility. That's a game changer
I came here to hate, but it's actually pretty good.
No point in hating. If a guy needs to tow on a regular basis and wants to go electric this is his truck.
Actually point to hate, it's over 100 000$ starting price
@relaxedpenny604 wrong. There are many under 90k around the country and even some at $ 85k. So no need to call this a 100k truck.
There is a lot to hate (price, weight, no CarPlay, ect) but it's an earnest effort from GM and that is all you can really ask for at this point in the EV revolution..
Very cool but have fun replacing those tyres and suspension bushings every two weeks
This is some incredibly good sound from the iPhone
Via the Hollyland Lark M2 mics ;)
he has a mic on his chest. you can see it
I'm just gonna say it, Chevy watches this channel. They got a lot of things right with this one.
I love it. as a lover of GM, I am very happy to see this creation. But as a Cybertruck owner, its just so much more than a truck and range has not been an issue for me in any way. I have also driven it cross country. Maybe once im tired of my Cybertruck, ill get into one of these.
ITS PEAK EV!
Not really since its like 9000lb 😂
Well the Hummer EV is the absolute king of the weight mountain. This is the K2 of EV trucks, how's that?
For a 100k truck it’s unforgivable to not give people both Android auto and Apple CarPlay.
Customers may pay $100K GM is paying a lot more. Each dime more they spend on the truck is another dime they lose.
@@danharold3087 As of Feb 2024 iPhone had a 60.77% market share, that’s one seriously expensive dime they’re shaving off. If there’s one thing you don’t want to do it’s have >60% of your potential audience look at all the effort you’ve put in only to think twice because their comms device doesn’t work natively with it.
The extra hp, is seen vital to tech bros that don't know shit about vehicles. The fact that Chevy decided to actually focus on the general user of this vehicle shows they know what they are doing. The tech bros can have their fast launching Rivians and Tesla's that is cool for about 5 minutes.
MKB Awesome Video I'm glad you made this I had a beautiful truck pull up on the side of me Nice Color and thanks to your Video I now know what it was.Thanks for sharing.💯✌️
Except for the price,
I love it , than you for the review Marcus
I hope I can buy some wallpapers of this car? Anyone know an app?
Doug Demero or whatever the F his name is said that this is the best EV Truck on the market.
The millionaire from money who destroyed the used nice car market with his cars and bid site?
You think this guy knows about cars more than Doug does? Mkbhd fans are delusional.😂. Keep glazing him though, maybe he'll jizz on you or something.
@@colin-nekritz isn't Marques also from money and a millionaire?😂
@@colin-nekritzhow did he destroy the used car market with his website?
8800 lbs!? That’s insane!
Yeah...I wouldn't like to be a tire on that truck!
I think with a more modern battery chemistry and some cutdowns on weight here and there, it could go under 3 tons...and actually be a bit more feasable. Also wouldn't like to be a brake pad in it!
Not really it's in the neighborhood of your 1 ton and above trucks. That said this it is a lot of weight for a 1/2 ton truck so definitely reconsider driving it on soft ground.
A thing of beauty. When I get mine, I will use the front to add more batteries. That way, I will be able to charge it where I am. But I’m an electrical engineer, so I can do this without messing with the truck’s warranty.
Way better than the Cyber truck, thanks for the video.
Hummer is the refrigerator on wheels?? I think that's the Cybertruck😅
Cybertruck weighs almost 2400 pounds less than the Hummer
Cybertruck is a microwave on wheels.
check weight buddy lmaoo
According to raccoons, Cybertruck is a dumpster on wheels. 😂
@@mwupclose But which one looks more like a fridge to you?
2024 Lucid Air Grand Touring has a range of 516 miles.
I wish they made wallpapers for cars
I work at the Spring Hill EV plant and they currently build the LYRIQ. It and the Acura ZDX both use the same batteries and amount of cells. Each car gets 12 cells, I believe the Silverado gets double the amount of cells to around 24 per battery. So the range isn't shocking honestly.
some of these features like the screen are in my blazer! thanks for the vid!
MKBSD here
You don’t like that the AirPods Max don’t have a power button, but you do like that this giant vehicle doesn’t? Lol that seems real backwards
This video has product placement vibe all over it
Also the obsession with storage over other practical features is something I never get. I don't use a car as a closet. I only need just enough.
@@Philonic dude is not sponsored by Apple but probably got 💴 from GM. Get it?
The difference is the truck actually fully turns off. The AirPods Max do not. even in their sad excuse for a case, they are never truly "off".
@@JMilMoviesEVs never fully turn off either. There’s always a computer running in the background listening for a command. My Model 3 loses about 3-5 miles a day due to this background activity.
Sweet video on that iPhone 16 pro, bro! Am impressed.
I think it looks pretty crappy at times... Lots of times where it looks like the lens is dirty, and the scene is washed out, but you know he wouldn't skip on that.
Other times it looks totally fine.
Like at 7:02 it goes from looking fine outside to looking like sh1t around the screens.
That braking paddle on the steering is inherited from it's grand-daddy the Chevy Volt :)
It's tough to use a truck for work when the payload is limited to just 1,000 pounds. In construction, you typically need a payload capacity of 1,500 to 2,500 pounds because materials are heavy.
Most people who buy trucks not only don't work in construction, they don't even use the bed of the truck lol
@@minch5537 but when you need to use it for construction stuff it should be a good option. It’s 100k dollar truck that has the same cargo weight capacity of lots of medium size suvs. That is just odd.
1000 pound payload capacity is pathetic. After it’s loaded with people it would leave legit nothing to put in the bed.
@@johnnyfive-bc beginning of the silverado EV's they're definitely not built for construction work yet, more experimental and for fun use now.
Trucks are used for work every day with 1000-1500 payload. My loaded F150 has maybe 1350 lb of range and I tow a 8500 lb trailer
Can't really call the Tesla a truck. It's completely non-functional as a truck; it loses 20% range when the tonneau is open because of the ridiculous shape. Because of the angles, you can't really throw anything in from the side, only from the rear. Which also makes it really difficult to even use the decent sized bed(anyone shorter than 6-0 can't reach anything mid/far back in bed without getting in the bed).
Your funny. The cybertruck get 10% more with the cover closed because it has the factory cover. The ridiculous shape makes that 10% possible. You will not see that improvement with other pickups.
I have been hearing this " you can't really throw anything in from the side," from people who have never owned a 1/2 or 3/4 ton 4 wheel drive pickup. While you can "throw" things in, the boxes are too far up in the air to let you reach in and get stuff back out. I have a 1/2 K1500 and I can pick stuff up just along the box wall. I imagine if one has a 1/2 4WD from the F100 era you can reach in. I know the 1973 IH 4WD I used to drive was much lower.
@@danharold3087 it's "you're"...and, yes, I am.
Only I speak in facts here, which is unfortunate for you Elon fanboys who can't admit when you've been bamboozled.
Fact: the cyber truck is highly inefficient with the tonneau open. It's been tested, quite often, and proven to be a solid 15%, and up to 20% especially at speeds of more than 50 mph.
Clearly you're not a real truck owner, or at least you're one of the truck owners who has never really used it as a truck. The standard large trucks you mentioned all have other means of getting into the beds from the side as well as the back.
But, hey, you go on and keep telling yourself that it's a "truck" 😂
@@TheLearningCatalystCoach
Lets get back to something we have sources for. Efficiencies.
Cybertruck is the most efficent with the box closed.
Only the Lightning is more efficient with the cybertruck box open. Using your 15% and the least efficient CyberTruck the 3 motor cyberbeast.
472×1.15 = 542.8
These are from out of spec motoring. All tested on the same loop at 70mph.
Model Efficiency (Wh/mi) Range (miles) Battery Capacity (kWh)
Cybertruck (Cyberbeast) 472 254 123
Ford F-150 Lightning 511 255 131
Rivian R1T 545 289 135
GMC Hummer EV 811 303 212
Silverado EV 3WT 588 329 203
Silverado EV RST 571 387 210+
@@TheLearningCatalystCoach You need a new source for fac
00:22 It is not the best filming device, it seems. Watch how the light wobbles, it is probably some software bad processing.
The biggest thing I hate about the F150 is that the screen isn't landscape. Glad to see Chev didn't make that mistake. Might be my next truck.
PHYSICAL HVAC CONTROLS FTW!!!! Excellent design choice Chevy!
No 1 from Africa