Can I unlock it with my photo? Face ID vs Windows Hello vs Samsung Facial Recognition
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 21 มี.ค. 2022
- How safe are facial recognition systems on various devices? In this video, I try to fool the iPad Pro with FaceID, the Razerblade with Windows Hello, and the Galaxy S21 Ultra with its facial recognition. The results are fascinating!
I have informed the manufacturer whose device failed to recognize my real face. - วิทยาศาสตร์และเทคโนโลยี
I used Samsungs for years and never used facial recognition. I used the fingerprint scanner. When I bought an iPhone I was like no it only has Face ID but it’s been amazing. With glasses, gloves, a mask, even the dark
Welcome to the brighter side
FaceID is better, of course. However, the fingerprint scanner on the Galaxy is also good.
@@WYSbyAdamLash I have had the exact opposite experience. SOOO many situations where Face ID doesn't work. I switched over to an iphone 12 Pro Max a few months ago and it's been one of the most frustrating experiences.
Times when FaceID is awful:
When you're driving
When you wake up
When you take off glasses
When you're phone is at arms length
When are focused on something and can't look straight on at the phone (like taking a quick glance at messages while gaming or phone conference)
When it's flat on a table (you have to learn at some really odd angles)
When you're crying (yes I know it's odd, but this is an actual problem that I had the unfortunate experience of finding out. Your face is more likely to contort. Potential issue in an urgent situation)
Having been at this for months now, I would go back to the fingerprint reader in a heartbeat. Like not even a question in my mind. I wouldn't mind having both as an option so that each type kind of fill the gap for the other.
Its a pain in the ass...
@@Skapomaybe u just have a goofy face
As a 2d person, I find this feature very offensive!
Lol
Hi, my name is Flat Stanley and I found this extremely offensive as well.
Brah, I’m 1D, into her p---.
You are just too narrow minded.
I identify as 1d.
Print out a physical picture and tape it to a mannequin head.
😅
Genius
I had the same exact idea!
Thank you so much for your video Adam, You are a great reviewer and you do your job perfectly well. I feel so bad to see so many people being rude to you in the commentaries, you do not deserve this, congratulations you're awesome.
Thank you for your kind words 👊🏻
I just bought the S21 FE model SM-G990W 2 and it has a proximity sensor. It is listed in the manual, but the S21 and S21 ultra manual does not list it. Wonder if this makes facial recognition more secure?
Great video. Just what I've been looking for. Thanks!
Was the iPad seeing glare obscuring parts of the picture? That's a pretty bright light pointed at a pretty glossy screen.
Not really.
Yeah, you always know it's a convenience feature only and not very secure if there's no IR sensor. However, I wish both mac and windows would have an option to do this without an IR sensor in situations where you don't need extreme security.
Absolutely. This is precisely what I said in my next video. Watch it.
The simple explanation for why Samsungs face unlock is garbage is because it used the front facing cam and compares what it sees to a 2d image of your face it has saved. Whereas windows yellow and Face ID read your face in depth 3d and is impossible to trick.
I had a 3d printed verson of my face that I created using the faceid dept camera, it doesn't fool the faceid, and windows hello sees that it is a face it just says it doesn't recognize it as me. i dont own a samsung device to test on.
Lol nice one. Indeed, FaceID can't be fooled with a 3D face. Thanks for your feedback 👍🏻
Hold a camera that can see infra red ( such as a tv remote LED ) in front of an ipad / iphone and you might see that its using a bright infrared light to aid its facial recognition.
Might be a depth perception feature.
I see you mentioned the ir sensor near the end.
How about repeating the test but with a printout of your face glued to a polystyrene or plastic mannequin head.
Scrap that , wall street journal tried similar in 2017 on the iphoneX.
The only conclusion is that apple uses sorcery for face id...
@@markhowards420 It's not sorcery, it's using thousands of infra red dots to re-create a 3D model of a face. Do you remember Microsoft Kinect, it's the same exact thing only shrunken down to fit into a phone.
I feel like it would work if u turned down the brightness on the iPad because when u try to take a Pic of a bright screen, it's difficult to focus on the screen
What would work?
i really would have preferred if you used the laptop for all devices but yeah, results were as expected.
Thank you for your feedback.
What if I 3d scan your face and print it?
Fun fact: IR cameras are not able to capture visible spectrum of light. So Face ID didn't even know that there was a picture or something being displayed on the Mac!
can you elaborate? sounds interesting
@@WYSbyAdamLash Your eyes see visible spectrum of light. The illuminator that is used with face id is infra-red. IR is not in the visible light spectrum so we are not able to see it. The face id cameras are filtered from all visible light spectrum and can only see the IR light. That is why it didn't see the picture.
Yep my friend looked through it she was like I opened it with a picture and it turns out it works wtf 🙄 and there's no fingerprint on the galaxy tab a8 like they have to fix this
Great video…big up brother👍🏾
Thank you 👍🏻
iris hack possible?
Critical flaw to your test, you used a screen to show the picture. An actual large printed headshot needs to be tested, partly because how electronics "see" a screen (If you ever have tried to record a CRT tv back in the day and saw distortion, you'll know what I mean) and also a photo can be bowed outwards to provide the depth you mentioned it requires.
Thanks for your feedback. I am not sure how this is a flaw. The only way this works is with the method you've seen. It doesn't work on a printed image. The point behind this test is to find a way to fool the camera, regardless of whether it is a screen or printed paper.
@@WYSbyAdamLash You're saying that the Phone works with a computer screen image of you, but not a high resolution and to scale photograph? I find that hard to believe that a computer screen works and a photo doesn't.
The point of me mentioning this was to see if a different medium would work to fool it. As you said, the first two likely use algorithms that computer for depth to ensure it's not just a picture on a screen, and with my comment about bowing printed photo outwards, you could possibly test the complexity of that testing. For example, if it just has to detect that there's space beneath the chin for example, a picture could be slightly creased backwards at the chin in the photograph (or even have the photo printed and affixed to a manikin head. Do you see what I'm trying to get at?
@@randymartin9040 I do and I completely agree with you. I think it should be tested!
@@randymartin9040 Randy i agree, i suspect that this is an Apple shill channel and he is just trying to discredit Samsung as they are Apples biggest competitor.
And it's suspicious how he doesn't use the same device in the same position for ALL testing as professionals always do
This video seems more like a scam to promote Apples products as "more secure"
what if we cut out the picture and place it on a place such as maniqune or balloon to mimic the uneven to cheat the depth sensor? Anyone had try?
It won't work.
I don’t think MacBooks have Face ID yet because Apple hasn’t figured out a way to implement their camera system into that thin screen. That’s also the reason why the front facing cameras on MacBooks are worse than iPhones and iPads, the can’t fit much in the thin display
The video I was looking for👍
👍🏻
My OnePlus never accepts any photos for facial recognition and neither does my Mi smartphone. I don't know what's wrong with Samsung which advertises itself as more secure.
Perhaps I should try this test on the One Plus as well. Try using a photo on a well lit screen such as the iPad to simulate a real face.
@@WYSbyAdamLash Already tried that using my Mi pad 5 on OnePlus 10T and Mi 11T pro 5G. It didn't work. Both passed the test.
Does the OnePlus have a depth sensor? I don't think so.
@@WYSbyAdamLash Nah, it's just the front camera. But the AI behind face recognition is doing a great job I believe.
@@ShadabKhan-sh1gg interesting
Nice video but is it practical to a '' Face Recognition APP '' in order to verify my picture by the application?
What do you mean?
Did the same test on my ipad and the S21 Ultra in a HD photo taken right now in good light and it didnt work 20/20 times I tried it. idk
This test was conducted in a unique and specialized manner, making it quite challenging to replicate.
El S8 y S9 tienen lector de iris, en esos modelos no podrás desbloquearlo con una foto
Yeah I remember the Iris scans.
You really don't know right, the samsung doesn't have the dot projector it has a singular big spot NIR laser but not the dot projector with can sense the depth of the face surface. That's why the samsung can be fooled it doesn't have the depth sensor it only has the NIR laser
I actually don't care, I've always preferred fingerprint unlock. But if Samsung's phones can be fooled so easily, they just shouldn't have facial unlock. Just ditch it until it's secure.
Which is why I think Samsung’s marketing suck. Don’t get me wrong, they make nice phones, but a lot of times they over promise, but under deliver with features that just don’t work properly. There is no point in having many new features if many of them don’t work as advertised.
@Rohan Chatterjee I know, but STILL….
Overpromise, underdeliver leads to poorer customer loyalty/satisfaction…
I agree in that fingerprint unlock is much more secure.
They dont have physical dedicated camera like the face id sensor on iphone, so yeah that's why. I have a samsung and always use my fingerprint though 😅
you should turn off the 'faster recognition' in the face recognition setting first.
if it is turned on, it will increased the speed but reduces the security and increasing the possibility of images or videos recognized as your face.
Try print the picture of your face. Maybe the device can detect if it was from another device's screen
It won't work. It only works with a picture that has a backlit source like an iPad.
can you visibly see the infrared light with your eyes from the razer when you are using it?
no
Human eyes can only see a small part of the light spectrum, which is called the visible light range. Infrared light under most conditions cannot be seen by the human eye.
@@maitreyagokhale3081 it can lol do better in sckoool
@@flamingkillermc2806 *under most conditions. Learn to read properly first.
@@maitreyagokhale3081 LLLLLLLL
Is it 13+ to unlock it with face?
Was interesting watching 🔥 very nice 👌🏻
🥰
@@WYSbyAdamLash can you do this with an accurate wax or silicone cast of a skin-colored face with a wig
Good one! Just picked up a Samsung and wont be using any face stuff :P
You can still use it. Believe me, it's not easy to bypass. I had to do many trials.
What if you just finished boxing an opponent, and you came 2nd, will it unlock with 2 blackeyes and a swollen face? We need a test... for educational purposes of course.
Say what? 🤣🤣🤣
I wish MacBooks would not work like Windows Hello. But FaceID would be nice to have.
Absolutely. We are all waiting for FaceID
@@WYSbyAdamLash apple is not adding face id to mac as apple believes that its already convenient enough to have something on the keyboard to unlock ur laptop bc your hands are on the keyboard on the laptop
i read this off a real apple insider and i think its true
@@nothingatall3104 maybe one day...
They are different in terms of hardware, so you can't compare them like that. That's why Google won't let you use face unlock for mobile banking apps.
Interesting
Why did you put the iPad on the wall when using Samsung but when u use an IPhone you don’t put it on the wall
Trust me, with the iPhone, it won't work no matter thr position.
I do not understand why apple requires a passcode to activate facial recognition?
Both do. It's necessary.
You were supposed to reboot it after changing your settings.
Nooooo. Once u did the kernel is stick like .... just trick by a pair headphones
Since this video shows a older Samsung with a older version of OneUi. So the security of face ID should have improved right?
Unfortunately, things aren't different with the Galaxy S22 Ultra even with the latest firmware. This issue cannot be fixed with software due to hardware limitations (no depth sensor like the iPhone). Watch the same problem happening on the Galaxy S22 Ultra in my review here:
th-cam.com/video/KAm9zz7_8D8/w-d-xo.html
Samsung lets you know before you register your face that facial recognition can be tricked by a photo and that it is the least secure method on their phones. It's not a design flaw, it was an intentional decision to remove their infrared scanners to improve their screen to body ratio. If you want the most secure method of unlocking your phone the ultrasonic fingerprint sensor is what Samsung wants you to use. Just like apple pushes face ID over any other method.
I prefer fingerprint unlocking anyways from Samsung because I think it's my practical than Apple Faceid which was a problem during the Pandemic.
Good point. Watch my newest video.
Not exactly, after iPhone 12, face id actually works with mask, which is pretty awesome
@@damnfreakingsien It works NOW because they recently updated it, but during most of the pandemic, it was frustrating for iPhone users. I commend Apple for adjusting, they clearly want to keep its customers.
@@damnfreakingsien That's true. My only gripe is that it doesn't work with sunglasses, which is very inconvenient.
@@WYSbyAdamLash yikes! but I heard it depends on the type of sunglasses as well!
Samsung really shot themself in the foot. The S9 had it all. The fingerprint scanner on the back exactly where your pointer finger was so you could easily unlock it while grabbing it out of your pocket and was ready before you were. There was a pressure sensitive home button that you could hard press while full screen so you didn't have to do an unnecessary swipe before going home. It had Iris detection for secure facial recognition and that with the camera and earpiece were crammed above the screen for an uninterrupted screen Then, Samsung got the brilliant idea to replace the pressure sensitive home button for a less conveniently placed fingerprint scanner, remove iris detection, and put a punch in the screen thats less offensiflve then Apple's notch, but worse than they had before. None of the sensors were too efficient, but if they worked at it, I'm sure by now they'd have the best setup that no one could come close to.
I appreciate your perspective on the S9. Tech companies make changes based on various reasons, and it's always interesting to see which features resonate most with users. Thanks for sharing your thoughts!
what’s your ipad case?
Spigen Tough Armor
@@WYSbyAdamLash Thank you! And I love your content ❤️ made us trust apple face id more 👍
@reggie4279 Thank you for your feedback 👍🏻
Just remember that Samsung's fingerprint recognition is also safe, much like Apple's Face ID. In fact, I am using fingerprint recognition, and I disabled face recognition on my Galaxy S22 Ultra. I also informed Samsung about this issue, and they know about it.
this is the sole reason i went for the Huawei p40 pro when it first came out
Huawei is actually less secure than Samsung, generally speaking. Samsung has Knox, which has military grade encryption for all their devices. When I had the Huawei P20 Pro, I was very disappointed when I called their customer service to inquire about security and encryption. At the time, Huawei devices were not encrypted, and that is a major security risk. Think about that before selling your phone to a stranger, for example.
@@WYSbyAdamLash i never really sell my phones and sorry i wasent more specific i was talking about the huge camera notch that houses the 32mb camera as well as the IR blaster which i loved, but i have found ways to enjoy my P40 pro with out google and all those restrictions, its been a bother like not having auto updates and other annoyances like that but over ive had the phone for about 2 years and im still loving and discovering features on this phone!
@@nicholashritcu7236 That's cool! I miss the IR blaster from my Huawei 😭
But s10 5g have face id so I can't unlock it with a 3d picture
The S10 has what?
Great video
Thank you
Anyone try this on an S23? I tried this with my picture on an iPad and I couldn't get it unlocked.
The S23 Ultra still suffers from the same problem because it is mainly a hardware issue. Samsung's phones lack depth sensors, and that's why iPhones have larger notches.
Doesn't mean they can't make software improvements.
I took some high quality face photos and displays it on my monitor.
Still unable to unlock my S23 with it.
@UteZ I will repeat the test on the S23 Ultra as soon as I get it. FYI, both the s21 and s22 ultra suffered from the same issue.
Windows hello is gold standard because it can't be fooled by twins
Really? Thanks for the info. That's awesome
We need the child's facial id.
Just another point. Having high resolution images of your face on social media is a bad idea for this very reason. If someone you know steals your samsuck and then just goes to your Facebook or Instagram or LinkedIn profile and copies your face image. You’re screwed. Hell get into you’re phone and see those pics of you in Vegas with that tr@anny.
🤣🤣🤣🤣 yikes... that sounds like nasty skeletons in the closet. The good news, however, is that it's not as easy as you think. This took me much experimentation to achieve the results you see in the video. The distance, medium used, angle, etc all play a role in unlocking the phone with your face. The point of this video is not to scare you about Samsung phones, but rather, to show that it's possible to unlock with a picture. Watch my other video here to understand:
th-cam.com/video/HJ38d8aJcC8/w-d-xo.html
At least Xiaomi is honest about this, before apply this option, it warns that someone can open your phone with your photo 😂
Samsung also mentions that in the settings.
what xiaomi? my redmi note 11 cannot be unlocked with a photo.
could you please test S21 recognize now gor the new Android 13 UI 5 .. I think they made it more secure.. this update for today
Many people have asked me this question for the S21 and S22 Ultra. The answer is: it doesn't matter. I tested the S22 Ultra again, and the problem persists. The issue is still there because this is a hardware issue- as mentioned in the video. Since there is no depth sensor, it can never be resolved. The hardware component is lacking.
I don't understand why samaung removed its facial recognition sensors. They had them in the s/note 8 and s/note 9 BEFORE face ID. If they can hide a fingerprint sensor under the screen and make a tiny cutout for the camera, they can find a way to bring back the facial recognition sensors... give us a new "Infinity-O" display with more sensors, Samsung 👀
Excellent point
Hehe my bro held the mac in one idol position for the iPad and kept moving the pic on the iPad for Samsung to think it's living
Lol don't worry there are no tricks here. I have tried many different combos. There is no way you can deceive FaceID. The reason is mentioned in the video.
What about video?
I haven't tried that
It's does not work under all circumstances , i have a problem sometimes in the dark + under low room light it's not working
I use both.
Ti's unlocked because s21 doesn't have face id sensor ot use. Camera to unlock the phone e
Yes, the S21 and S22 Ultra don't have a depth sensor (that's why there is no notch).
It's not a problem, it's a feature :D
Samsung: *warns, that faster recognition is able to unlock the phone by image*
Adam: *enables faster recognition*
Samsung: *unlocks with photo*
Adam: Samsung is not safe
Lol, it's actually the other way around.
Face ID is too convenient to pass on if you use NFC often. If I leave it on a subway, I don't think a random picker will have MY photo!
I should only be worried if I were a celebrity or I also left my driver's license along with the phone. If you keep the latter combo, don't use Face ID as the manufacturer does mention its weakness.
Excellent point. Even if someone has your picture, it's not easy to unlock, as I experimented with different angles, distances, and backgrounds to get this thing done. It's not as easy as it looks.
Tap the left side 3 then 2 for unlock.
What?
galaxy has no IR camera's so the results were expected
Precisely. Check out the S24 Ultra's test as well.
I knew not having that true depth sensor is a huge problem.
Laptops has true depth sensor , so I wonder for a 800 dollar Samsung phone.
Indeed
I mean YES, Face ID has been very superior compare to any Android phone's Facial Recognition/even Fingerprint System. It kinda suck that Samsung discontinued the Iris Scanner/Intelligent Scan that was last seen on the Note9 wherein they could have just retained it on a bigger holepunch display. Now Apple caught up with the Hole Punch and called it Dynamic Island which honestly has been long present on Samsung phone's through Galaxy S10+/S10 5G. It's just that Samsung failed to utilize it fully and let Apple steal the idea and add it beautifully on their Face ID implementation. I love iOS' Face ID cuz it's more secure and all that but in all honesty the only thing I hate about it is the two-steo unlocking where Apple could have implemented the effortless Face Unlocking where you don't have to swipe no more after the sensot recognises your face. Pretty goofy inconvenience but nonetheless I wish Apple would still address it on the upcoming iPhone 15 series.
#FaceIDisTheSuperiorOfAllBiometrics!
FaceID is generally more secure than Samsung's Face Unlock, and Samsung clearly states that. I agree with your opinion regarding Apple's unnecessary inclusion of the swipe to unlock the phone. However, it can also be problematic since the phone may be unlocked when you point it towards your face unknowingly.
Indeed
Can you try it with a printed picture
Good point. I tried it with a pronted picture but it didn't work.
bro for real just put his face in front of the camera on the final one
Well, our relationship is over now, I’ve saw everything I needed😔
Lol what
@@WYSbyAdamLash I unlocked her phone☠️
@@slambamcam are you serious?
Pretty sure it wasnt your picture unlocking the samsung , you likely have recognised device smart unlick on and as you get close to your ipad it sensed it and unlocked , either that or it was pickung up your face from and 90 degree angle when you kept checking it. I have always used samsung and never unlocked using a picture 2d or 3d
@@paularcher24 i do not post nonsense on my channel. Check my other video for the naysayers.
what about a 3d simulated portrait using ai
lol haven't thought of that... I am not sure, but I don't think it would work.
At least samsung has its fingerprint sensor
True and I recommed it
I will be disabling face recognition on my Samsung Galaxy Tab S7 plus until the problem's fixed, otherwise, it's proven to be easily hacked with a picture, unlike my windows hello.
That's cool, but the purpose of this video wasn't to scare people. I just wanted to point it out. Keep in mind that it's not easy to fool it with a picture as I had to try many times.
The new Pixel 7 and 7 pro have face unlock too, and the 6 and 6 pro did not. The way they've been talking about the feature overall, it seems very clear that it's unsecure and almost not even recommended. It's stupid that Apple doesn't include a finger print scanner in their phones these days but it's even more dumb that Samsung and Google both have such bad facial security unlock features
I read/heard that it's so unsecure that payment apps (including Google pay) require fingerprint authorization even if the phone was unlocked via your face. Aka Google themselves don't trust the feature. And I way way prefer Android to iOS, I use both but my android phone is my main phone. Galaxy S21, with finger print unlock only
Indeed, Samsung and Google both should increase their biometric security. Apple has been doing it right for years with FaceID, but it's about time they introduce Fingerprint ID as well.
Why would apple need fingerprint ID when Face ID is so much more convenient and also 10x secure. 1 in 1000000 failure rate compared to the 1 in 100000 failure rate of fingerprint scanners
@Slimere Woods The reason is simple: convenience. Fingerprint ID is more convenient, especially in the dark or when you can't look at the screen to unlock it due to whatever reason.
@@WYSbyAdamLashFacePrint ID
I think that Apple introduces their new system with fingerprint and Face 🆔 at the same time.(Fingerprint on screen)
But nowadays fingerprint on screen very bad security idea 💡 so it took many years to do that.
Maybe even Face ID 2.0 will come faster…
You know samsung know your face,the detail and it is already store in samsung macfee database .
McAfee?
Window Hello Face is not secured like FACE ID!!! If you closed ur eyes, Window Hello Face still unlock, FACE ID is STILL Lock! This Channel shoul make this test more
You are right about that. It turns out that Windows Hello can still unlock with your eyes closed, which may be a security flaw. However, unless you have a sleeping person in front of the sensor, there is no way it would unlock, even with the eyes closed, because it has a depth sensor like the iPhone. You can't unlock with an image.
@@WYSbyAdamLashI've already tried, even I'm wake up and closed the eyes, it still unlock. I hope Window Hello Face can improve the Closed Eyes issuse by the software, can it? Or because the hardware...
I simply think that it kept recognizing you when you kept looking at it to see if it was unlocked and unlocked itself faster than you could see... But let's say it's true. If you truly lost your phone, no one would know what you look like to use an image anyway.. Only someone close to you could actually use this "image flaw" as a plausible jailbreak method...
It is still a security risk that even Samsung warns you about when activating facial recognition due to the lack of a depth sensor.
@WYSbyAdamLash Thanks for the info and explanation. Question.. Is an iPhone depth perception actually "full proof?" Just wondering. I use both iphone & galaxy..
@@bravokilo1972 Yes, it is foolproof. You can't fool the iPhone's Face ID.
@@WYSbyAdamLash Thanks
its not as your showing man, i can prove iphone can be opened with other person face. i have an iphone which can be opened with 2 different faces, although only one face id is applied on it
Why would anyone need a face recognition lock? It's less secure than a 4 digit pin even. And some unknown data collecting companies are stealing your face photograph.
convenience
The trick for Apple is use a Live Photo !!
No. It uses a depth sensor.
Ohh thats sad by samsung but fingerprint is smuch more secure
If samsung has a lidar scanner then it would be better
No need. Just a depth sensor just like Apple's or Huawei's.
Who tf uses Facial Recognition in Android devices when you have under display fingerprint sensor?
Good point. Sometimes, it is faster to unlock the phone with your fave than fingers.
If the person eyes are close
If the eyes are closed, it won't work
My iphone literally opens from my picture
Impossible.
And that is why I use touch id
Good point
No it dint unlock when you tried to check it unlocked or not you showed your face and hence it unlocked
No
@@WYSbyAdamLash
You dint understand.From the video what i understood is that when you showed the phone to the photo after you disabled fast unlock when you tried to verify wether the phone unlocked or not you revealed your face to the phone and the phone unlocked immediately moment you showed your face
@@debojitmandal8670 It wasn't because of my face. It was the picture. I tested this several times. If you don't want to believe it, then that's your choice.
@@WYSbyAdamLash it's not about my belief I am just saying what I saw in your video that's what I was able to infer but hey i could be wrong as well.
Thanks. I will continue using only biometry on Samsung
Thank you for your feedback.
when you are watching porn and you lock your computer, cos someone walks up to you, then your computer unlocks and you didn't mean to.
what the hell bro
@@brkenppt2222 because windows hello.
As someone with both a samsung and an iphone, I wanna see somebody try and beat me down, to then take a picture of my bloody face and try to unlock my phone😂 ain't nobody gonna have an issue here I can ensure that
Whoaa... let's not imagine crazy scenarios like that! 😅
@@WYSbyAdamLash you kinda have to because most people won't let strangers just grab their phone with their ENTIRE identity on it
It is a little bizarre tho😅
Try again now, maybe they updated it. It didn't work for my current android phone today which means its safe. Before, I've also used a cheap huawei device with the ID and my friends were unsuccessful to unlock my phone with a high quality picture.
Thank you for your comment. I have just tried it again, and it failed. This problem will never be solved unless Samsung adds a depth sensor. Although it is not easy to replicate this, only the fingerprint scanner is 100% secure.
Check my new video on this!
I use finger print
That is the safest option.
Samsung facial Recognition is not use same as Apple Face ID use laser 3D scan.
FaceID uses a depth sensor.
I guarantee this face ID doesn't work after 20 beers
I phone ai came can read pixel redaction.
iPhones have a depth sensor
Its work on dead person
Why would you ask such a horrible question??
👍🌻
Its fake I test with my s 22 ultra on my tab it didn't unlock
Don't accuse me of nonesense. I don't post fake stuff on my channel. Check the test for the S24 Ultra. Just because it didn't work for you doesn't mean it's fake. I had to run numerous experiments with different dimensions, lighting conditions, etc for this to work. Even Samsung tells you that it's possible to unlock with a picture so it's not as secure as fingerprints.
@@WYSbyAdamLash Honestly, don't even waste time with stupid people like that, you better off just deleting the comment, your video was great btw
Something tells me the reason why the phone unlocked is because you peaked at it before showing its unlocked when we have faster recognition off.
No
@@WYSbyAdamLash No? ok. I'm fine with that. I just think that facial recognition on android should have some sort of priority, its a convenient way of opening up the phone, but its not secure enough on android phones to make use of. Sucks to Suck ig.
You're right aside from him being fanboy and unfair he's one shitty tester
@@jonstrider8380 Good point. Android phones should be as secure as iPhones.
And the phone is redmi
what?
Face if isn’t real it’s looking at ur eyes whole looks at the eyes not the face don’t be fooled
I didn't get it
Green eyes, really? I can see a defendant difference between your face and the picture, so I don't think this is a good test, even thou it didn't unlock.
Lol you mean the glint in my eyes? That is the glint of passion... my passion of tech.
@@WYSbyAdamLash No it is green tint in some of the renderings in the video of the image used. The image used could be a lot better, if I can see the difference between you and the image on the tablet in your TH-cam video. Besides the cameras doesn't see a video image the same as we do, which means the image on the tablet could be way out of wack, because we see RBY and not RBG. I think it would be a better test for a print to be used, and with correct color correction. I my opinion, not a good test.
@@lesliesavage9229 There is a reason I used this specific arrangement. I had conducted several tests before, and printed photos don’t work. The only way to fool the camera is to have a life-size picture of your face on a tablet. Thank you for your feedback.
@@WYSbyAdamLash So it looks like you didn't use a full size nongloss photo either, which is what I would have done. Still the camera doesn't see things the way we do, and the tablet doesn't present a picture the camera see the way we do. The primary colors are different, so there is no real reason to expect it to work, even thou it did on the phone. Your eyes were even the wrong color to the human eye in your video, which you have now failed to comment on. Nice video, poor test procedure.
If the screen is LCD, it prob will not work
in fact, it is the opposite. It only worked on the iPad, not on a printed paper, at least for me.
@@WYSbyAdamLash no need to be mad, when i I talk lcd, i mean like uhd, fhd, amoled like, when you take a picture of a laptop or a phone, it will prob be slighty black and not focused, meanwhile on a paper it will not, so it may work