Tascam Mixcast 4 vs Zoom Podtrak P8 - Real Life Comparison (Rode PodMic and SM7B)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 27 ต.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 113

  • @tobiaslofi
    @tobiaslofi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    On the Zoom P8 there is a "noise gate" on all channels (not the individual channels) it is actually called "auto mix" or something, which turns down any channel that isn't talking automatically. That sounds more natural that a hard noise gate. And saves you a ton of time in post-production. (This again is a feature that neither the Rødecaster Pro nor the Tascam Mixcast 4 have.)

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Yes, auto mix is nice but it only works with multiple mic's active. It's not a noise suppressor so if you're running a solo podcast it does nothing (as opposed to a gate). The Tascam Mixcast 4 does indeed have the auto-mix feature!

  • @mattcero1
    @mattcero1 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    After having the Mixcast 4 for about a year now I could not be happier. You can bring in 4 outside callers via USB Voip call, TRRS on back, TRRS on front right corner that uses channel 1 and Bluetooth all with mix minus. Yes! the pads and they have text letting you know what sounds are assigned to which pad and that's HUGE compared to other products. 4:47 that's a headphone/mic jack in front, TRRS.

  • @alancaldwell8192
    @alancaldwell8192 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Really useful review Dave. I have a Mixcast 4 arriving this week so I appreciate you taking the time to run through all the different settings. I have a Rodecaster Pro but it had an encounter with a large glass of gin and tonic! I was undecided whether to go for the Zoom or the Tascam, most people are leaning towards the Tascam having the edge over the zoom.

  • @DeborahRowePodcast
    @DeborahRowePodcast ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you. That was a great comparison video. I'm ordering my unit tomorrow and was still undecided... you really helped me make my decision.

  • @Irshaad88
    @Irshaad88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +7

    The USB power adapter for the rodecaster pro works with the mixcast 4. I have it and tried it. Works like a charm. You have to use the correct powerbank though, just like with the rodecaster pro.

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Really?! Whoa!

    • @dragonlion108
      @dragonlion108 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thedavedillon

    • @arriagatwo777
      @arriagatwo777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Excuse me, what does you mean with "the correct power bank"?

    • @Irshaad88
      @Irshaad88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@arriagatwo777 You need at least 2.4 amp output. Some Anker and Ravpower power banks work. When you purchase the Rode USB power cable, they give you the required specifications of the power bank.

    • @ibnzer0
      @ibnzer0 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      hey i have a mixcast and i'm considering this for my setup, how big is your power bank in mAh and how many hours do you tend to get out of it?

  • @chrisphilips7570
    @chrisphilips7570 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Thanks Dave I was weighing up between these two before I searched for a VS review and you were right there. Great info

  • @kekeslider
    @kekeslider 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Fantastic comparison video, thank you so much! The Mixcast sounds better to my ears. And it seems superior in so many other ways as well. 24-bit 48k, and a true multitrack interface... that's a no-brainer

  • @michaelnattress126
    @michaelnattress126 ปีที่แล้ว

    I use the Mixcast to livestream sports for our local high school. I was thinking of getting the Zoom as a backup , but after your review helped me chose against it. The new firmware update on the Mixcast allows for some of the one touch features you mentioned. The sound pads are a big this for me, because I use them for commercials. It has multiple banks that the Zoom doesn't seem to have. I use the noise gate suppression to filter out background noise when I'm not talking.

  • @mlegrand
    @mlegrand 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is this the new Curtis Judd killer channel? Loving it!

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Lol not quite! Curtis is the GOAT! This was literally a test I did for myself to see what these two sounded like side by side… but it seemed like it was worth sharing… I think 🤔 thanks for being the first comment 😂

  • @tobiaslofi
    @tobiaslofi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    On the Zoom P8: You can tap the soundpads channel on the screen to see the names of your jingles. Not as easy as on the Tascam, but at least it is visible somewhere, not like on the Rodecaster Pro where you don't see names of jingles ever.

  • @Irshaad88
    @Irshaad88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +6

    Here's some advice you didn't ask for... I think you're overdoing it a bit with the deep tone on the mixcast 4. Sounds a bit too boomy to my ears. The audio quality sounds much nicer on the mixcast 4 when you choose the manual option under tone, and then adjust the high and low shelves individually. Lastly, you have a very nice, but strong voice, prone to plosives. I suggest using the fatter windshield with the sm7b. I mean no disrespect. Peace ✌

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Thanks for the feedback. I'm not much of an audio person so I tend to just pick what sounds good out of the box. The deep tone does sound a little boomy with the SM7B but makes the Podmic sound a bit better!

    • @Irshaad88
      @Irshaad88 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thedavedillon oh absolutely the podmic definitely needs that

    • @thehwink
      @thehwink 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Also. Drink water or tea or lemon water before you record your voice. Avoid coffee. Lubrication is your best friend. -podcast producer

  • @blkmidia
    @blkmidia 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Best comparison on YT!
    Tks

  • @OgDj2024
    @OgDj2024 ปีที่แล้ว

    looks like a pretty nice piece of equipment, and has all the bells and whistles for doing a podcast and a radio show.

  • @RyanMcQuen
    @RyanMcQuen 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    The Mixcast has that nice professional radio quality.

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Certainly sounds good to my ears!

  • @jackwang6716
    @jackwang6716 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    all nice functions, but one necessary functions stopped me from get it. That is the Auto mute monitor (when engage mic fader) function. We all have speakers/monitors in our setup. when we are not talking to the mic, we all enjoy use the speaker monitor to monitoring on the program. But how many time did you forget to turn off your speaker monitor before you engage the mic fader, and then get a crazy whistle. that will jam up your recording. I know you can post edit that, but how much trouble you have to go though. When you can just have this simple little function turned on like the old time radio station analogue mixing table. I thought Tascam should understand the importance of this functions from the radio work flow. But yet this function is missed. On the other side, Rode Caster pro has this function, which is critically needed by pod casters, and Rode listens. I have talked to the Tascam rap, they said they will look into it, but never got any feedback. I am not sure if my though has gone anywhere. but a month and a new firmware upgrade later, this function still hasn't been added. I am not sure about you, but I can't use this fancy thing with out this auto mute function. it will make my pod cast workflow so messy, because every time I open faders, I need to check the monitor volume. ( think about how many time do you turn on/off your fader during a show) You will what I mean! I guess If Tascam doesn't add this functions, Tascam is really pushing me to Rode caster pro. If you are getting the same concern, please support me, Let's help Tascam develop the best Pod cast mixer together!

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Interesting issue, I don't use speakers often but I could understand how that could happen.

    • @ITonOccasion
      @ITonOccasion 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      recent update fixed that I believe

  • @mattcero1
    @mattcero1 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Zoom sounds a tad stronger with all settings turned off for sure. Great video guy! I'm going to plunk down though in the Mixcast 4 just for the cell phone mix minus connectors and the addressable affects pad. Great review sir. The Mixcast 4 requires 12.5 watts maximum and that's is beyond the spec of all USB except 3.2 which isn't even close to being "saturated" out there yet so not realistic to power it over USB. The Rodecaster P.S. is 5V and 1 Amp totaling 5 Watts and that's USB'able. I'd prefer an audio device that uses higher voltages as audio with higher voltages require less amps to get the same wattage and will usually have less hummmm.

  • @Pharesm
    @Pharesm 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    *great rundown* *!*
    How are the knobs and faders mounted? I bought a Zoom mixer once and sent it back the same day, because their knobs and faders were obviously *only held by the solder joints* *!*
    Build quality was dismal. So I'm suspicious about plastic built small consoles, no matter what the specific flavor is...
    *No USB power* option does kinda suck.

  • @chriskayenge6839
    @chriskayenge6839 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    i'd really like to have a quick feedback if possible; i'm about to buy this product and my question is: i have logic pro x; is it possible to record directly on my software 4 simultaneous microphones and each input separately? how to setup this; thanks

  • @JoeCastellon
    @JoeCastellon 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very helpful comparison. I keep liking the Mixcast better and better. It appears to be slightly better than the Rodecaster Pro.

  • @adamesq
    @adamesq ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Quick note - polywav can be opened by GarageBand and dragged into Audacity from what I've seen.

  • @reliabletv758
    @reliabletv758 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I would love to see a master out on these units so u can route the main audio to a fm transmitter. Then it can also be used as a main mixer in a radio station. That would kill all those expensive broadcast mixers out there.

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Interesting use case. Could you use a headphone or monitor output for this purpose? Or route the audio through a laptop and into an FM transmitter?

  • @daveunger3996
    @daveunger3996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Great comparison. I really appreciated the way you demonstrated the sound output with and without effects turned on. Do you have any experience with Zoom L-8 mixers or thoughts on how they might compare to the Mixcast? Seems like it would be more comparable to the Mixcast than the P8.

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The L8 is more designed for live music/music recording while the P8 is designed for podcasting so thats why I compared these two. I don't have first hand experience with the L8 but one nice benefit is that it supports 24 bit/48K recording while the P8 is limited to 16 bit/44.1K. The P8 has a much nicer screen/interface and built in editing which is a bit of an advantage as well.

    • @daveunger3996
      @daveunger3996 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @@thedavedillon For me, the P8's focus is on padcasters who want to get a "good enough" audio mix recorded, minimally post processed, and published. The sound pads are big and obvious and easy to use. The L8's longer faders are geared toward people who are fussier about adjusting the mix of their live sound. The higher bit rate and ability to record individual channels instead of just the final mix provides much more options during post processing for improving sound, separating crosstalk, and repurposing content by slicing long form podcasts into short snippets. If my only focus was getting a podcast out the door, the P8 would make much more sense. To get flexibility to do more requires using the L8. Sounds to me like the Mixcast 4 combines the best of both.

  • @BGRecon
    @BGRecon 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What XLR cables do you use?
    And also I wanted the mixcast 4 but I ended up getting the tascam US42 because I only do a podcast slash stream with one extra person. One day I'll get one of these bad boys.

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I got them off of amazon. Braided cables that were pretty inexpensive!

  • @mistergrooveman1018
    @mistergrooveman1018 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice vidéo man !
    Just let us know for other set up you used !
    Thanks !

  • @theMacGyvercom
    @theMacGyvercom 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I enjoyed the comparison. Keep up the good work.

  • @graveltraveldirt
    @graveltraveldirt 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I'm trying to find a sample of the poly wav file produced by the Mixcast 4. Specifically, I would like to determine if I am able to open the multitrack file in Audacity. I know there is a Tascam podcast editor, but I would like to migrate to a new board without impacting pre-existing production workflow. Thanks.

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yup, I edit my files in Adobe Audition without an issue. I assume it’s the same for audacity.

    • @graveltraveldirt
      @graveltraveldirt 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thedavedillon thanks. It seems like the multi channel should just open with each channel on track but you never really know.

  • @michaelboggs5161
    @michaelboggs5161 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    What brand and model of microphones are you using? It looks like a nice convenient setup.

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rode Podmic and the Shure SM7B

  • @SkyCharter
    @SkyCharter 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Helpful. Thanks. Decisions decisions...

  • @Malumen
    @Malumen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Did you end up keeping the Mixcast 4? Could you test your unit and listen for a noise floor/hiss on the headphone outputs? (no mics, nothing else, just headphones in the monitor ports and listen if the unit can actually emit "zero" sound)
    I've had to RMA a half dozen Rodecaster Pro units until I was eventually given a refund. They all had this terrible hiss/buzzing or noise floor when everything was set to 'off' and the unit was factory reset.

  • @djcova6235
    @djcova6235 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great video & super detailed! Could you do a video comparing the sound bank features from the p8 Vs mixcast. As a podcast / love streamer that flexibility of sounds banks & how many sound fx we have is important.

  • @fabriziocolista
    @fabriziocolista 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you very clear info! I am starting my podcast channel and forme you videos are very very useful 🙏

  • @YEYSHONAN
    @YEYSHONAN 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Mixcast 4 sounds softer and better but that's an opinion.
    I use Rodecaster Pro and I'm thinking of adding Mixcast 4 now...
    BTW, I can't have my Rodecaster Pro serviced (seems impediance problem with channel 4 mic) since I had it shipped over to Japan.
    With Tascam, I can buy it in Japan with full warranty.

  • @StrangeloveYT
    @StrangeloveYT 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Very well done and informative. Thank you!

  • @saarbrook
    @saarbrook 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Nice. The only thing I was hoping to hear you address was the incredibly loud bleep button. I’ve not been able to lower its level. Very ear piercing if several sound effects are planned to be used. Did you notice the same?

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      lol yeah, it's a bit loud. You can just dial back the soundpad fader when you anticipate using the beep or you could potentially just make your own bleep sound and assign it to a pad?

    • @saarbrook
      @saarbrook 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thedavedillon lol it'll definitely remind you not to curse. i really dig the device and will most certainly create a custom sound. thanks!

  • @flyboytech8246
    @flyboytech8246 ปีที่แล้ว

    What kind of headphones are you using

  • @tobiaslofi
    @tobiaslofi 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The Tascam looks and sounds better. But the Zoom has more and better features.

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The on-board editing of the Zoom is nice but not something I use often. I've found the Tascam to be more feature rich in most departments including 24 bit / 48K audio, true multi-channel over USB, USB-Delay settings, voice effects, on-board processing for noise gate and more granular control of the EQ/Compressor. They're both quite good though!

  • @kmacradio
    @kmacradio 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    I think the Tascam mixcast 4 sounded best and it's my favorite of the two.

  • @Maikdrop
    @Maikdrop 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Do you know if i can use Track 6 to get sound from my PC via the Podtrak from my PA? I want to have the PA Monitors connected to the Podtrak. Thansk for response!

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sure, you can route your USB audio over USB to the mixcast

  • @waltjennette
    @waltjennette 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    First of all, GREAT QUALITY!!!! Secondly, I own the Rodecaster Pro but I've been trying to find an excuse to get the Mixcast 4. I want a travel unit and I'm debating whether or not to just buy another RCP. I love the way the Mixcast looks, though!!!!

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Ever consider something like the Podtrak P4? So much easier for travel!

    • @waltjennette
      @waltjennette 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thedavedillon Yes, but I have a Zoom H6 so the P4 isn’t enough to peak my interest yet. Lol.

    • @RyanMcQuen
      @RyanMcQuen 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tascam Portacapture X8?

  • @polyphonicgroove
    @polyphonicgroove 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    I think your Podmic sounds much better than the SM7B. The SM7B sounds muddy and dark.

  • @kevinwolfe376
    @kevinwolfe376 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    How does the mixcast 4 compare to the rodecaster pro

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +5

      Very similar. I think the Mixcast 4 has cleaner pre-amps and about 10db more gain so it's easier to drive mics like the SM7B. The Mixcast also has a few advantages like the sound-pads have indicators on screen to show what the buttons do and the built in voice changer/reverb. Both are great units though!

    • @radioprobromania
      @radioprobromania 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@thedavedillon rodecaster cut 80hz on the music line. I use rodecaster for radio online and im disapointed.

    • @bukpospolity
      @bukpospolity 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thedavedillon like to read your responses, so informative before doing the final decision on buying the desire unit

    • @arriagatwo777
      @arriagatwo777 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You cannot talkback to your remote guests on the mixcast 4.... big drawback

    • @Silverwerks
      @Silverwerks 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@arriagatwo777 This was addressed in a firmware update.

  • @timmanning9
    @timmanning9 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    is the mixcast software for Mac and windows?

  • @Av-pu2bo
    @Av-pu2bo 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    👍🏿 much appreciated

  • @trevormcmanis
    @trevormcmanis 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great info. Thanks for sharing

  • @MrPresentv
    @MrPresentv 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank you, your review didn't help with the choice!

  • @indatrenchespodcast
    @indatrenchespodcast 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Review!

  • @jettdadswell
    @jettdadswell 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    a bit biased towards the tascam, bu thats cool everyone has their preferences , actually I watched again, I take back the biased bit. Good review.

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I have no reason to be biased. I bought both with my own money. I just think the Tascam is a bit more advanced in a lot of areas. The zoom is great, and I like the fact that it can run off USB bus power but the Tascam has a lot of benefits including proper 24 bit recording.

    • @jettdadswell
      @jettdadswell 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thedavedillon so thanks for the reply. I will look further into the Tascam, as for usage, what easier?

  • @arriagatwo777
    @arriagatwo777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The Tascam looks much robust. The biggest drawback: you cannot talkback to remote calls! I don't like the fact you have a bunch of xlr you will never use on the podtrak... they could have included the bluetooth in built. For those and other reasons the best piece of equipment is still the Rodercaster pro I think.

    • @Hdthevoice
      @Hdthevoice 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      So on the mixcast, you can take a call and get the audio but you cannot hold a conversation correct? What about zoom, the conversation app, is that the same kind of deal?

    • @arriagatwo777
      @arriagatwo777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@Hdthevoice hi! You can surely hold a conversation and recorder and all bells and whistles... what you cannot do is prepping your host over the bluetooth nor by the tcr or "mobil" cable... prepping means you can talk with your guests over the phone without being recorded.

  • @alexramamx
    @alexramamx 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    The mixer (Tascam) has frozen twice and makes a buzzing sound. The only way to fix the problem is to restart it by disconnecting the power cord.😡

    • @arriagatwo777
      @arriagatwo777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tiene que haber nuevos firmwares para actualizarlo aunque he escuchado que es un procedimiento bastante complicado

  • @jeffacuesta
    @jeffacuesta 3 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Mixcast all the way!

  • @ЮрийХоджаНасретдин
    @ЮрийХоджаНасретдин ปีที่แล้ว

    Спасибо!!!

  • @farwestgarohills3831
    @farwestgarohills3831 11 หลายเดือนก่อน

    What you call quirky key sound being recorded, is due to your microphone is not suspended. You need a good microphone suspension. In my case it doesn't happen. It happens with all Zoom recorder, which got auto actuator; when there is no sound, mic is suspended by relay. This relay click are always recorded by all Zoom recorders; is very much annoying. I am leaving Zoom forever, except for the time-code generator-recorders for cameras.

  • @mcdan2696
    @mcdan2696 ปีที่แล้ว

    Tascam Wins!!!

  • @wedoluxury
    @wedoluxury 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    sweet =)

  • @webandbe
    @webandbe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    HINT: They both terrible on stereo audio (Music)... they will tell you they aren't designed for this... while a cheaper device that cost fraction of these device's price do everything perfectly.

    • @adamesq
      @adamesq 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What the!? Why would this thing not be able to handle music? Are you talking about using the 1/4" input jacks? I'm thinking I could use USB out from the computer to the Mixcast and send all audio to my receiver (and on to external speakers). Bad idea?

    • @webandbe
      @webandbe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adamesq I did not say it can't handle music, I am saying the audio quality is not good enough... Most people (probably such as yourself) don't even know what's a good sound quality... they mostly press play and starts nodding their heads. All I am saying here... the audio quality on an audio source such as mastered audio music is BAD... This unit is perfect for VOCAL PODCAST and possibly instrument... but NOT AUDIO MUSIC.

    • @adamesq
      @adamesq 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@webandbe Welllll...if it's "terrible," for my purposes, it's not handled. Anyway, I have had my share of experience with album production and studio mastering. Unless you're talking about audio aficionado snobbery (respect, but not my thing), I have a decent idea of good quality audio and when equipment is not cutting it (I've had my battles with 1khz USB issues, Moog vocoder carrier waves bleeding through, S/N ratios that didn't cut it, lifting grounds back in the day, etc).
      Bottom line...I have an unopened Mixcast 4 here, so before I jump in, I was trying to figure out if there's a major drawback here. I was hoping to figure out what exactly where the unit is falling short. My first guess was that the DA converters are not handling audio input on the 1/4" jacks properly...or if there's simply a software issue. I'm not planning on mastering an album on this thing (supposedly, that can be done on the RCP 2), but if it's screwing up playback...that's an issue. Do you think this is a software or hardware issue? (I was hoping Tascam would be far more active on marketing the Tascam, FAR more active on social media and much more proactive on updating this thing.)
      Thanx for any insight.

    • @webandbe
      @webandbe 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@adamesq Fair enough, I have to add that I owned the unit in its early days... Maybe things have been improved since via Firmwares and softwares etc... Tascam is and will always be a great brand, I currently use X8 Multi-Track Recorder to record my DJ sets and it's the best recorder around (to me at least) and I tried few... everything for its purpose.

  • @DocFUNKist
    @DocFUNKist 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Top guess… BOTH OF THEM ARE TERRIBLE and I do mean Terrible on music audio preamps

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Terrible is a strong word. They're certainly not class leading but they're pretty good for consumer grade podcast products.

    • @DocFUNKist
      @DocFUNKist 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thedavedillon Agreed... for podcasting... not for Music.

  • @TheClearSight
    @TheClearSight 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    17:24 i doubt that it records in 48 thousands kilohertz.

    • @adamesq
      @adamesq ปีที่แล้ว

      😂That does seem just a little extreme.

    • @TheClearSight
      @TheClearSight ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@adamesq no its not extreme, but for the purpose of catching audio and transmiting it, for the human ear, absolutely useless =)

    • @adamesq
      @adamesq ปีที่แล้ว

      @@TheClearSight 😂 2 points for that one.

  • @utente9903
    @utente9903 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello can i use the combo input of the mixcast 4 for music source too? Do you think is useable as live mixer on my web radio ? Thank you

    • @thedavedillon
      @thedavedillon  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      I suppose you could but why not use the TRRS, or USB instead?

    • @arriagatwo777
      @arriagatwo777 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@thedavedillon perhaps he's running out of trs or usb channels.... That's an issue on the Podtrak 8