In Depth: Sony X900F LED TVs

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 พ.ย. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 137

  • @aakar88
    @aakar88 4 ปีที่แล้ว +22

    Never cared about specs anyway. Just buy the best Sony your budget allows, you will be set. Don't bother with the other brands.

  • @Your-BestNightmare
    @Your-BestNightmare 5 ปีที่แล้ว +17

    Tests,smests... I bought this TV and it's exactly what I thought it'd be....amazing as F!

  • @Driver2397
    @Driver2397 5 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    The xf9005 65 inch is a beast t.v. great picture for a v.a led panel and Sony has the best picture processing in the business. 4k hdr looks eye popping.

    • @onurdonmez8181
      @onurdonmez8181 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      ordered it today...after comparison with samsung q60r qled, i go with this one..

    • @PharoaH-hc2zr
      @PharoaH-hc2zr 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Onur Dönmez qled better colors sony colors seems to br washed out

    • @fukrfuck290
      @fukrfuck290 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@onurdonmez8181 SAMSUNG 85" Q70R the best --no blooooming like the sony!

  • @djnes2k7
    @djnes2k7 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Crazy how the “xtreme” didn’t improve the UI at all....there’s a delay with just the volume popping up

  • @gAndres44
    @gAndres44 6 ปีที่แล้ว +14

    “In Depth,” right....

  • @BertoJA876
    @BertoJA876 4 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Who else here after 2 years researching on TH-cam this TV'S compatibility with the PS5.. 😫✋🏾😁

  • @ummer14
    @ummer14 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I am conflicted between the 49inch q70 or the Sony kd49xg9005bu. Which would you recommend and why. Thanks.

  • @ebarbie5016
    @ebarbie5016 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Does this model accepts a 1080P @ 120Hz PC and PS4 signals? THX

  • @tonyzeno2715
    @tonyzeno2715 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    QUICK!!!! Need a 75 inch TV do I go with the 75 Sony 900F or the 75 Samsung Q80R???? Gaming and Wide angle viewing are important... LMK your thoughts?

    • @willthorson4543
      @willthorson4543 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tony Zeno well...the Samsung. Go look at different review videos and come to a conclusion. Don't rely on one opinion. But to me, the Q80 is pretty fantastic for gaming.

  • @SPIDEYRING
    @SPIDEYRING 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Just ordered the 65" Sony X900F. Returning my 65" TCL 6-Series back to Amazon (they are processing my refund).
    The TCL 6 Series was ok but HDR/Dolby Vision was too dark. There was also a defect in the FALD.
    Had the Flashlight effect on every dark screen. My 55" TCL 6-Series is fine. It will stay in my bedroom.

    • @lvhboy
      @lvhboy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Good choice. I have also returned my cheap Philips 65" TV and got 65X900F. Glad I decided the upgrade. X900F is way more beautiful. The major drawback of SONY LED TV is that 4 corners are slightly darker.

    • @SPIDEYRING
      @SPIDEYRING 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      My X900F was cracked out the box from a 3rd party Amazon Seller. Had to wait a week for them to pick it up. Didn't want to press my luck with Amazon anymore. Went to Best Buy and got my dream TV. The 65" Samsung Q9FN (480 FALD Contrast Zones, 2,000 nits of brightness with HDR10+). Had 8 4K TVs and this one is the best. Four weeks and it is still going strong. Also got a Samsung M9500 4K Blu-ray Player which is getting the HDR10+ update.
      Got the 55" TCL 6 Series in by bedroom. My wife loves it so it's basically her TV.
      "All of the HDMI inputs will work with 4K and HDR devices, but for best results Sony recommends using input 2 or 3 (which have higher bandwidth than the others) with 4K Blu-ray players and making sure to engage "HDMI enhanced" mode.
      Unlike LG and Samsung TVs, the X900F will not detect and automatically change that setting for you, which is a shame." (straight from CNET).
      My 65" Samsung Q9FN has four HDCP 2.2 HDMI ports. All high bandwidth which detect and automatically change the setting for you.

    • @lvhboy
      @lvhboy 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      DI RRec SAVAGE Q9FN is a great TV with GTEAT price. No Dolby Vision support on Samsung, weird.

    • @SPIDEYRING
      @SPIDEYRING 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Hao Lu Yeah my HDR10+ on my 65" Sansung Q9FN looked better than Dolby Vision on my 55" TCL 6 Series from the Sony x700. Now that is Weird. I guess it has to do with the High PQ in the Samsung Q9FN. 🤔

    • @juko592
      @juko592 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      GROOT DX did you got an oled c7 or so to compare?? i got it now and im thinking about a sony switch-like xf9005

  • @HDLife
    @HDLife 6 ปีที่แล้ว +43

    This guy is blowing lots of smoke. Get the tv in a comparison test and get to the point.

    • @doomtomb3
      @doomtomb3 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Han E you are watching an ad

    • @gorillapancake
      @gorillapancake 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      He always does.

    • @34sld
      @34sld 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      He's wright different companies use different methods, why is that so hard to believe, all these men are there to sell there product no matter the company. Why can't people accept that oled is not the greatest tv ever.

    • @kstreet7438
      @kstreet7438 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      ATH3X G wouldn't say it's the greatest just yet. Has lots of problems. You shouldn't have to babysit a $3000 tv

    • @SagaciousFrank
      @SagaciousFrank 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@34sld, absolutely OLED is not the best. Well, it is, but only in certain areas. It has its drawbacks.

  • @jirijankovec7575
    @jirijankovec7575 6 ปีที่แล้ว +18

    Isn't it better to buy X900E for 25% lower price?

    • @Brutalfire01
      @Brutalfire01 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Jiří Jankovec much.

    • @rlwings
      @rlwings 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      Yes, absolutely! The new 900F is a marginal upgrade for a lot more money. Most consumers won't notice a bit of difference! ... Get the 900E today at deeply discounted prices! (Or get the next size up). :)

    • @mykolasjankaitis4587
      @mykolasjankaitis4587 6 ปีที่แล้ว +6

      better buy x930e then

    • @princeyarlin
      @princeyarlin 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      or get the 900f in 49 inch for 1,099

    • @TheAdamAdy
      @TheAdamAdy 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Its also a 25% less TV, x900f is worth its price.

  • @noscrubbubblez6515
    @noscrubbubblez6515 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    my 10 year old flat screen has 5 different pre-set picture settings, one for movie viewing (dark) one for sports (excessive bright) one called standard (almost as bright) and another two. the one i choose is called Preference. it allows me to customize the tint, amount of color and contrast and brightness. i turn down the contrast and color and make the tint less green to get what i call; STUDIO REFERENCE. i do this during live news broadcasts- to achieve what the station intends you to receive. its not perfect for example during a presidential speech all channels broadcast the same image, yet some are broadcast with better picture and sound- even though they are all 1080p hi def. but it becomes splitting hairs. in the industry you have to have selling features as mentioned in this vid; but can you discern the claims without really seeing them in your home? i really bought it because it uses one third the electricity my old tube TV used. now i never see any TV that claims you can customize the color, tint and contrast- it has become spec babylon.

  • @Theshadowstar1000
    @Theshadowstar1000 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

    One question, would you advise buying a Sony 800D series TV now...!!??

    • @MRfisheri
      @MRfisheri 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Karthik R Dude... No.

    • @Theshadowstar1000
      @Theshadowstar1000 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      In my price range I could get a 2017 model 700 series...or a 2016 model 800 series...that is my dilemma...!!

    • @neverendingmods
      @neverendingmods 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      The 49x800d is a IPS screen, 43x800d is VA. Unless watching from angles the VA is superior image but sucks at an angle.
      The 65x750D is a bigger version if the 49x800d tv and IPS screen. The 65x750d tv is 120hz and 43/49D TV's are 60hz.
      The smaller 700d TV's are 60hz. So get biggest tv you can afford. Late 2016 Sony TVs like the 750d, 800d are very close to their 800E TV's. The 750D, 800D series have triluminous displays and HDR the 700 series doesn't have triluminous displays I believe and are early 2016 TV's and have known issues with panels.
      Read reviews on best buy and sony website .
      I own Sony 49x800d tv and like it for $750 price I paid but is a rather dim tv compared to the newer 900e TV's. I read the 850e has quality issues with power supplies. Buy best you can afford man. Decide on VA or IPS panel screens too as that makes the biggest difference. Any kind of viewing at an angle in a large room get IPS screen. Bedroom get VA.

    • @kstreet7438
      @kstreet7438 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Karthik R why would u buy such an outdated tv? Get a tcl if you want a cheap TV. Just save up longer to get a better tv if you buy a cheap 4k you will regret it

  • @Sbrabson04
    @Sbrabson04 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great Questions and awesome answers. New subscriber :)

  • @MaZEEZaM
    @MaZEEZaM 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    What I really want to know is how they compare to the leading brands as far as picture quality and software, you don't hear much from Sony anymore and they seem to offer few tv's.

    • @ryanw0987
      @ryanw0987 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sony have amazing pictures quality bt there operating system is slowest operating system, but the picture quality I's best

  • @CarlosRodriguez-ij7rr
    @CarlosRodriguez-ij7rr 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi, what would be the differences between 900e and 900f? which is better in image quality?

    • @nickxcore74
      @nickxcore74 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Carlos Rodriguez The 900f has the better picture quality, but the 900e is much cheaper, and excellent value for money.

    • @monstalova
      @monstalova 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      There's hardly any difference! To Casual buyers even putting them side by side you would find it hard to tell which is which. Get the x900e

    • @bcapers12
      @bcapers12 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      More dimming zones and a much better processor are the big differences.

    • @monstalova
      @monstalova 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      bcapers12 actually the X1 processor chip (only in the x900e) is very close to the X1 extreme. The only difference is one stage of upscaling compared to two (which sometimes makes no difference), plus slightly better super bit mapping for HDR but the x900e actually has better color gradients overall than even the x930e. So seems the better lag in 4K gaming plus more responsive OS is the only real world difference.

    • @bcapers12
      @bcapers12 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Monsta Lova Are you comparing the 930e to the 900e, because the guy asked for the differences between the 900e and 900f.

  • @sirjonsmithiii992
    @sirjonsmithiii992 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Got the x900e as a monitor. Games use hdr10, so no worries. But i would never buy a new tv without both hdr standards.

  • @tylerwessling3402
    @tylerwessling3402 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Just get a X900E it's still a fantastic television

    • @kstreet7438
      @kstreet7438 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Tyler Wessling or get the 900f

    • @itxelfletes9774
      @itxelfletes9774 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      which one is better? 900e or 900f? I heard the 900e has no banding issues. how bout the 900f? I just bought a sonyb65in 2020 900h and I see it does have banding issues I can see it with my own eyes!!! 😔

  • @EtherMagic
    @EtherMagic 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The X930E is what the X900F should have been.

  • @rezkaermandamrezka6676
    @rezkaermandamrezka6676 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Sony is the best

    • @ankitsen5971
      @ankitsen5971 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Rezkaermanda Mrezka no doubt

    • @johnboko7110
      @johnboko7110 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      LG is the best

  • @rlwings
    @rlwings 6 ปีที่แล้ว +37

    Denison talks too much. Doesn't let Phil finish voicing his ideas ... Very frustrating to watch... Terrible interviewer. He needs to make his questions more concise, then shut up and listen!

  • @elzeena
    @elzeena 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Great job Philip

  • @vidsurfer0725
    @vidsurfer0725 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fucking love this TV, couldn’t recommend it more.

  • @googlewogglenoggle1997
    @googlewogglenoggle1997 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Is this just as good as x9000e for ps4 pro

    • @kstreet7438
      @kstreet7438 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Googlewoggle Noggle uh course since its the newer model. How could it be worse lol.

  • @claudiuionutdanet973
    @claudiuionutdanet973 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Can anyone help me please, with this information?
    Q1: Is there an internal TV player on the SONY X900F? I mean, can I play a 4K HDR (MKV x265 4K HDR) movie by connecting an external HDD to TV through the USB connector?
    Q2: Can I connect my PC to this TV trough HDMI and play a 4K HDR (MKV x265 4K HDR) movie ?

    • @monstalova
      @monstalova 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Claudiu Ionut Danet yes to both. You can either use the stock video app that will automatically come up when usb drive is inserted. Or you can add another app to play it like Kodi, plex, vlc, etc.
      If you want to do it through your pc install media player classic and enable mad vr. You will need to go through quite a few settings and lav filters but the picture is better than any other player, including Oppo. As you can customise every single part of the display to your liking.

    • @claudiuionutdanet973
      @claudiuionutdanet973 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Thank you for your answer! I have already installed on my PC, MPC-HC + MadVR, I use everyday to play movies and TV shows from my PC via the HDMI port. My current TV is just FullHD-SDR and I want to replace it with Sony XF90.
      I wanted to know for sure that if I replaced the TV, I will be able to play HDR movies from my PC via the HDMI port or an external HDD connected to the TV.
      Another question if you can help me: What about Dolby Vision? When the TV will receive the DV update, will I be able to play HDR DV movies from my PC to TV through the HDMI port? Or from external HDD? Who is need to do the decoding part: the TV or MPC-HC + MadVR?

    • @monstalova
      @monstalova 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      Claudiu Ionut Danet right now there is no way to decode the metadata from Dolby Vision. As its so high even from a mkv bluray remux you still will only get HDR. Hopefully soon someone will make a codec to play it through a PC or usb. Only through apps like Amazon prime and Netflix plus a handful of 4K blurays on specialised player like the Oppo does DV work.

  • @NextNate03
    @NextNate03 3 ปีที่แล้ว

    If specs don't matter, then everybody would be watching on a black and white 5 inch mechanical TV from 80+ years ago.

  • @Irishgamer01
    @Irishgamer01 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    You know he is referring to SAMSUNG 2K bright TV's

  • @mihirchitnis905
    @mihirchitnis905 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Hey sony, start selling quality screen panels to laptops and desktop monitor manufacturers.

    • @Sinier940n
      @Sinier940n 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sony doesnt produce their own panels. Their Tvs use third party panels from Taiwan or China.

    • @abhs1141
      @abhs1141 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Panel is just hardware thing . The software technology is processor ie x1 extreme , trilimnious etc .

  • @bbaasje
    @bbaasje 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Dear Mr. Sony could you give Phil Jones a better suit.

  • @abhs1141
    @abhs1141 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    I hate when people talk video gaming on TV . That is not the main purpose . Tv is for viewing movies , watching sports , news , etc . Ok you can play games but all tv can . You don't buy tv not bcos of it is best to play games .
    You want the best picture , the best color , the best detail , etc . Then you give a 4 star bcos the other brand play game better . Plain stupid review .
    Then you hv VA panel , produce good black level , but some review makes a final conclusion , the screen is reflective , not recommended if you hv many lamps in the room . But when they review OLED tv , they give a 5 star . Never they mentioned , OLED screen is also reflective. Tv can be reviewed , in two ways , a glass half full , another one is a glass half empty .
    When you review OLED

  • @djnes2k7
    @djnes2k7 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The real question is why this tv isn’t nearly as good as the 930e. Minus motion handling....the 900f is completely inferior. Seeing as there is no 930f these two directly compete with each other

    • @NGuy-kz2eh
      @NGuy-kz2eh 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      The 95G might finally be what we've been waiting for.

    • @Soclean07
      @Soclean07 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Because the 900F isn't the successor of the 930E

  • @aaronlopez1462
    @aaronlopez1462 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    LED?

  • @flappospammo
    @flappospammo 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    shame about the crappy mediatek processor

  • @javi198130
    @javi198130 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Input Lag?

    • @daddybonez
      @daddybonez 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Javi D like 20 ms to 24

    • @fjinfante7187
      @fjinfante7187 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Good question Jevi D.... seems like no one has the answer for input lag on the 900f I even called Sony support and they don’t have a actual number. Smh

  • @guanyu210379
    @guanyu210379 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    X900F stand/feet design is a big no-no. This is a pity for such a good TV.

    • @kstreet7438
      @kstreet7438 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Yu Guan mine are still in the box. Love my mounted tv stand.

  • @courteousashwin
    @courteousashwin 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    When the fuck are you going to start talking about tv?

  • @ephraimisrael2078
    @ephraimisrael2078 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    The sony x900f is equivalent to the Q7 and the Q8

    • @M82RKY
      @M82RKY 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Q7? No....

    • @ephraimisrael2078
      @ephraimisrael2078 5 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Yes it is do your research

  • @johnboko7110
    @johnboko7110 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    That yeah song was repetitive

  • @Ashwinram28
    @Ashwinram28 6 ปีที่แล้ว +12

    Sony Dolby Vision is a delayed disaster.

  • @areku16
    @areku16 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    este video ni habla del modelo en especifico, parece mas un clickbait
    Ademas de que no hace preguntas utiles, vamos que no habla del producto, habla mucho y a la vez no dice nada!

    • @7motion985
      @7motion985 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Alejandro Jiménez totalmente de acuerdo, si es por esta entrevista yo nunca compraría un 900F. Es más como justificando porque no se ve bien, Es decir en parte es verdad 240 true motion Es para una marca. 960 x1. Para otra. Pero esta entrevista es tremenda porqueria

  • @jacks9386
    @jacks9386 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    so measurements mean nada specs mean nada looks mean the same sorry a terrible and worthless group of sentences js

  • @Irishgamer01
    @Irishgamer01 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Why does it X900F look worse than last years?

    • @Sinier940n
      @Sinier940n 6 ปีที่แล้ว +15

      It doesnt.

    • @andybell490
      @andybell490 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Irishgamer01 I

    • @theaterhelp
      @theaterhelp 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      It doesn't. I have both on display and the F is slightly better than the E.

    • @markallen1116
      @markallen1116 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      @Miguel L 930e would have been much better purchase 900f marginally better 930 significantly better than 900e. 930 gets much brighter and has more diming zones than both 900e/f plus better build quality.

    • @theman8688
      @theman8688 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Mark allen but the 930 is edge lit

  • @bluehefner51
    @bluehefner51 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    👍

  • @nickxcore74
    @nickxcore74 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This video is absolutely useless, people want information on this actual TV, not jargon about nits and so on.

  • @RobertK1993
    @RobertK1993 4 ปีที่แล้ว

    Sony X950G is better.

    • @dusandusan5016
      @dusandusan5016 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Marginaly better

    • @RobertK1993
      @RobertK1993 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dušan Dušan No a lot better I read X1 Ultimate better Full array local dimming better audio

    • @dusandusan5016
      @dusandusan5016 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RobertK1993 x1 extreme vs ultimate,48 dimming zones vs 48 dimming zones for 55",1000 nits vs 1100/1200 nits of brightness

    • @RobertK1993
      @RobertK1993 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      Dušan Dušan X950Gvhas more dimming zones has higher peak brightness in fact actually OLED quality the X950H even better X wide viewing able more dimming zones.

    • @dusandusan5016
      @dusandusan5016 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@RobertK1993 xf9000,xg9500 and xh 9500 have the same number of dimming zones.

  • @JamilAhmad129
    @JamilAhmad129 6 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hey

    • @PTSTUD87
      @PTSTUD87 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      Sup dawg

  • @nickxcore74
    @nickxcore74 6 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    And Sony, you’re a joke to even mention Dolby Vision.

  • @ANTHONY-rp3ud
    @ANTHONY-rp3ud 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    this tv has very bad backlight bleeding, do not buy it!!!

  • @kaine2078
    @kaine2078 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Sony = Slowest TV 2018.....not a gaming TV

    • @kstreet7438
      @kstreet7438 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Kaine it's not slow at all on game mode

    • @-zerocool-
      @-zerocool- 6 ปีที่แล้ว +4

      I play at 4K 60FPS on my PC with this TV and its literally perfect input lag.

    • @EtherMagic
      @EtherMagic 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@-zerocool- ... 25ms, not bad. But this years Q series gets 15ms and under, depending on content, plus a shit ton of gaming options built in. A gamer gotta be a complete moron to get a 900F for gaming, considering you can get a Samsung Q6 for less or a Q7 for the same price, and have the best gaming TV ever made, and those ain't my words, those are the words of countless professional reviewers and calibrators.

  • @racineurr.8924
    @racineurr.8924 5 ปีที่แล้ว

    The most uninformative review I watched. DT, you should be ashamed.

  • @princeerick11
    @princeerick11 6 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    This tv is just a waste of money .

    • @kuzushisakuraba2719
      @kuzushisakuraba2719 6 ปีที่แล้ว +2

      THATS RIGHT CAUSE YOU DONT HAVE ANY MONEY AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

    • @princeerick11
      @princeerick11 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      kuzushi sakuraba mhm

    • @japannippon4042
      @japannippon4042 6 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ha you’re a waste of time and space!

    • @M82RKY
      @M82RKY 5 ปีที่แล้ว

      At £1500 for the 65"
      Stupid boy!!!

    • @fukrfuck290
      @fukrfuck290 4 ปีที่แล้ว

      samsung 85 q70r!!!