@@razorburn645 when you say lasers arnt mature enough - they can melt planes - and have been tested on all platforms and seen action in the middle ear against IEDs - it’s mature .. A rapid fire buckshot turret would be cheaper as a drone flank cannon
Gepard always facinating to look at . It has such a strange look from the front , it looks like a locust or an insect from a scifi movie hahah. Anyone else agree it looks kinda strange ?
@@ColePhelps61 Yeah, it took me out for a loop as well. If you looked at their older videos, you’ll be hard pressed to find one in English. They do make high quality videos though, it is probably why they switched over to English, they started to get a western following. They have a second channel for their Japanese audience, we kinda invaded this channel 😁
I think the anti-aircraft vehicles that mainly use machine guns are still in use and will never get out of fashion. These may be not as sophisticated and not on the spearhead of the anti-aircraft units, but they definetely got their back. In Ukraine they use mobile anti-aircraft squads equipped with mainly machine guns on pickups or trucks, immortal ZU-23-2 of soviet origin or even personal assault rifles to hunt drones and cruise missiles. Theres bright future lying ahead of such solutions.
@@Weisior mas será mesmo necessário uma munição com esse mega calibre apenas para abater um drone? a munição deve ser mais cara do que o drone.. hehehe eu creio que a maior dificuldade que os Ucranianos enfrentam, são as bombas planadoras.. e não me parece que essas possam ser destruídas no ar com esse sistema de munição.. onde estão a os S 200 que a Ucrânia alegadamente tinha em enormes quantidades ? o S 200 da época da União Soviética. seriam até bons para os Ucranianos abaterem caças que voam mais baixo.. não?
@@VitalPereira-rm8lr To deal with russian aircraft launching glide bombs and cruise missiles they need their own air force on at least similar technical and skill level and a solid AD screen to complement it. Their air force is motivated and skilled, but not big enough and technologically inferior, their modern AA systems are too low in numbers to protect every single meter of their land, rarely working near the frontline where russian aircraft drop their munitions. Maybe this state will change when Ukrainians get enough fairly modern western aircraft, missiles and trained personnel in sufficient numbers, but it may take some time...
26 วันที่ผ่านมา
It's definitely making a comeback. They are cost effective for use against cheap drones.
Something that should be noted here: the American Avenger is _not_ an anti-air gun, or AAA (Anti-Air Artillery), as is evidenced by its gun being singular and a smaller caliber than its equivalents in other NATO countries. Rather, it is an AA platform, meaning it uses missiles as its anti-air armament. In fact, its missiles are also fired by the American man-portable Stinger launcher. However, its role on the battlefield is different than that of a SAM platform like the PATRIOT. Instead of being an airspace-denial/defense asset, like the PATRIOT and other SAM sites, AA and AAA platforms are used for localized air defense against targets that slip through a SAM site by flying low. Such targets tend to be primarily helicopters - hence the majority of NATO members using AAA - but can also be low-flying ground-attack aircraft, hence why the US uses AA.
@@bernardjansen6205 They used to. There was a 20mm 6 barrel "gatling" gun (rotary cannon) mounted on an M-113 (M163 VADS). It had too short a range to deal with AT missile carrying helicopters, but it's replacement was cancelled (there's videos about the M247 Sergeant York and why it never came to be). The bottom line is, the US decided that various levels of AAM systems all the way down to MPADS was a better way to deal with slow air - but mainly they planned to dominate the skies from above. Thing is, no level of air superiority will clear the sky of cheap drones, which is why everyone is going backwards and dusting off and reinventing AAA.
Tudo depende do calibre de cada arma, calibres maiores percorrem distâncias maiores, depende da cadência de tiros de cada arma e depende de um bom sistema de radar para alvos pequenos, neste caso abater drones e mísseis. O Gepard, que é um sistema antiaéreo alemão e não romeno, é de extrema eficàcia, testado na Ucrânia, abatendo até misseis de cruzeiro da Rússia. Já o sistem antiaéreo da Polônia e da Romênia queria mais informações também. O Avenger dos EUA tem calibre baixo, aparentemente eles demoram para abater um drone.
@@mirandela777 Yes, destroyed unlike the glorious... wait, every single piece of anti-air and every single sort of vehicle was destroyed by cheap drones on both sides. "Drones can destroy it" is not a way to evaluate the quality of anything. S400's, S300's, ZSU's, Buk's, Tor's, every tank on Earth have been destroyed up by drones. The Patriot has not been destroyed yet, but that's not because of it's quality, it just hasn't been located yet, a swarm of drones can destroy any vehicle. Until direct energy weapons become common, it will stay like that.
@@greenarmy1982no need to dream buddy reality is already happening supplying soldiers with cardboard body armor and guns from 200 years ago that have a fail rate 😂😂😂😂
These systems look dated. I know the Gepard is originally first deployed in the 1960’s but is a beast. With radar and fire control geared for anti drone, the guns on these old units will be given new life. The U S is way behind due to their doctrine of establishing air superiority before the age of drone warfare. But they are working hard to get up to date. That Polish 23 mm open top gun looks like 1960’s leftover Soviet equipment.
I agree, they are dated - but some of the new fire control systems aren't. You're right about the US being behind because of their air dominance plans - but also because once slow air started carrying cannons and AT missiles with a range of up to 5 km or more, AAA becomes pretty useless. The drones are a whole new issue, but honestly I think multiple chain driven.50 cals with a good fire control and radar is a good/cheap way to go for close in defense. High energy jammers will likely be the first thing they field (in various forms), and then they will begin launching counter battery fire at the drone's controllers by following the signal (like HARMs do with radar).
In addition to its chain gun the Avenger also carries missiles. this particular training unit did not have them equipped. The Avenger has laser and infrared technology to identify and track targets and its dual launchers can carry a total of eight heat-seeking Stinger missiles.
AAGuns like gepard can't stop fpv mini drones, and larger drones like bayraktar can destroy them from afar. There are several videos of ukrainian AAgun systems shooting iranian cruise missiles and drones but SAM missiles are more effective with longer range.
It’s not whole NATO where NATO is defending these days. You also have Australia and Turkey outside of Europe so EU frontier is not more important than thise 2 countries.
the thing is the us does not have a dedicated triple a platform ,I think the m6 lineback was suppose to be it but it didn't work out ( I dont know why)
The US military relies on complete air dominance wherever they are deployed. The pee-shooter is for drones. All these other anti-aircraft guns would be obliterated before they fired a shot.
...hay algo que no entiendo, de verdad todos esos cayones de rafagas realmente tienen chance ante un misil lanzado desde un caza a unos 10 o 15Km de distancia?
You don't understand that those were destined for low flying targets, helicopters in general, but after the war in Ukraine became evident they are very useful against drones. Apparently Gepard are very good to missiles too (in Ukraine!)
These thinga cant possibly shoot down modern fighter or ground attack jets can they? I feel like these would be more for shooting down rotary aircraft and propellar cargo planes like c-130s and c-17’s.
7:38 Weren't the Americans supposed to shoot the drone? Then how come they missed it so many times before finally shooting it down? If it was a kamikaze drone, they'd all be dead.
Lo que me encanta de la GUERRA son los DRONES pequeños por que es el futuro del planeta!! Los DRONES pequeños pueden volar a baja altura y por detras pueden destruir a todos los vehiculos que se ve en el video..
The 'Gepard' looks terrifying.
Well it _was_ designed by Germany
It is.
Es la comida favorita de los lancét rusos en Ucrania 😂
what is Tanguska then 💀
It not only looks. It is.
Hello from Romania! Those Gepard "kities" are on fire. 😊
Made in Germany though. Not Romania. They just bought them.
不要論が出てたのにドローンの登場で復活した対空砲
Cheaper than missiles and lasers aren't mature enough yet. So back to the old school.
@@razorburn645 have you seen Polands anti drone platform ?
@@DiceStrike Are you asking if I watched the video? Yes I have seen it mister armchair general.
Learn English! You would NOT have what you have today in ANY part of ASIA if it was NOT for the U.S. or Britain!
@@razorburn645 when you say lasers arnt mature enough - they can melt planes - and have been tested on all platforms and seen action in the middle ear against IEDs - it’s mature ..
A rapid fire buckshot turret would be cheaper as a drone flank cannon
Gepard always facinating to look at . It has such a strange look from the front , it looks like a locust or an insect from a scifi movie hahah. Anyone else agree it looks kinda strange ?
Yep me too I though wtf is that like wings
wenn er leuchtet ist er noch seltsamer
Thankyou for defending the Free World; from The D(Detroit MI) to all allied Nations!
"свободный мир" говоришь!😂😂😂 Я б засмеялся тебе в лицо , но тебя не видно!😂😂😂 То есть вы обезьянки из бореловского сада?😂😂😂😂
Free world!🤣🤣🤣
The Gepard is the true Warrior in this bunch.
That's a lot of duck hunting hardware
😂😂😂😂
The Romanian Oerlikon GDF is super cool
like the schweitzer and Österreicher
Warthunder really needs to update it's sounds, these SPAA sound killer!
sounds more distorted on youtube lol
Hide the avenger from war thunder
みんな大好きゲパルトちゃん！
ほんと大好き、レーダーくるくるしながら射撃とか最高にカッコイイ
😂😂😂😂Gepard beter Pasars mašina i Pancir Tunguska N01 Wold!
俺無知なんだけど音速で飛んでる現代の戦闘機にこう言う対空砲ってまだ通用するの？
戦闘機相手は厳しいかもだけど、ドローンとかいうハエを叩き落とす役割としてまた注目され始めてるんじゃないかな？
にしてもゲパルトちゃんのクソ速旋回するアンテナ可愛いよね！
@@panja6275
無理！
だから先進国組では対空自走砲はほぼ引退してるか、歩兵戦闘車の代用品になってる。
けどドローンの登場でまた配備されるかも？
The quality of this video is outstanding. Really enjoyed it.
Hello Japanese friends in the comments! 😂
This is a Japanese youtube channel 😊
@@LentPanic7 I would not have guessed that from the channel name 😂
@@ColePhelps61 Yeah, it took me out for a loop as well. If you looked at their older videos, you’ll be hard pressed to find one in English. They do make high quality videos though, it is probably why they switched over to English, they started to get a western following. They have a second channel for their Japanese audience, we kinda invaded this channel 😁
Hello someone
Hi😊 from 🇯🇵
I feel like hardware like this would be the most efficient and cost effective for countering low/slow drones like shaheed drones
Which is why Ukraine has Gepards.
機関砲メインの対空車両が復活していく可能性あるとはなあ
これから先の戦場もなにが起こっていくかわからんな
ジャマーでドローンを完全に無力化できればいいけどそう簡単じゃなさそうだし
Look up german Skynex AHEAD.
That is the future
I think the anti-aircraft vehicles that mainly use machine guns are still in use and will never get out of fashion. These may be not as sophisticated and not on the spearhead of the anti-aircraft units, but they definetely got their back.
In Ukraine they use mobile anti-aircraft squads equipped with mainly machine guns on pickups or trucks, immortal ZU-23-2 of soviet origin or even personal assault rifles to hunt drones and cruise missiles. Theres bright future lying ahead of such solutions.
@@Weisior mas será mesmo necessário uma munição com esse mega calibre apenas para abater um drone? a munição deve ser mais cara do que o drone.. hehehe eu creio que a maior dificuldade que os Ucranianos enfrentam, são as bombas planadoras.. e não me parece que essas possam ser destruídas no ar com esse sistema de munição.. onde estão a os S 200 que a Ucrânia alegadamente tinha em enormes quantidades ? o S 200 da época da União Soviética. seriam até bons para os Ucranianos abaterem caças que voam mais baixo.. não?
@@VitalPereira-rm8lr To deal with russian aircraft launching glide bombs and cruise missiles they need their own air force on at least similar technical and skill level and a solid AD screen to complement it. Their air force is motivated and skilled, but not big enough and technologically inferior, their modern AA systems are too low in numbers to protect every single meter of their land, rarely working near the frontline where russian aircraft drop their munitions. Maybe this state will change when Ukrainians get enough fairly modern western aircraft, missiles and trained personnel in sufficient numbers, but it may take some time...
It's definitely making a comeback. They are cost effective for use against cheap drones.
Something that should be noted here: the American Avenger is _not_ an anti-air gun, or AAA (Anti-Air Artillery), as is evidenced by its gun being singular and a smaller caliber than its equivalents in other NATO countries. Rather, it is an AA platform, meaning it uses missiles as its anti-air armament. In fact, its missiles are also fired by the American man-portable Stinger launcher.
However, its role on the battlefield is different than that of a SAM platform like the PATRIOT. Instead of being an airspace-denial/defense asset, like the PATRIOT and other SAM sites, AA and AAA platforms are used for localized air defense against targets that slip through a SAM site by flying low. Such targets tend to be primarily helicopters - hence the majority of NATO members using AAA - but can also be low-flying ground-attack aircraft, hence why the US uses AA.
hat aber auch .50 cal mit an Bord
But why does the US not have AAA?
@@bernardjansen6205 They used to. There was a 20mm 6 barrel "gatling" gun (rotary cannon) mounted on an M-113 (M163 VADS). It had too short a range to deal with AT missile carrying helicopters, but it's replacement was cancelled (there's videos about the M247 Sergeant York and why it never came to be). The bottom line is, the US decided that various levels of AAM systems all the way down to MPADS was a better way to deal with slow air - but mainly they planned to dominate the skies from above. Thing is, no level of air superiority will clear the sky of cheap drones, which is why everyone is going backwards and dusting off and reinventing AAA.
@@smgdfcmfah , thanks. Indeed, fighting a drone swarm with fighter jets and missiles isn't cost-effective. Back to AAA.
Hooyah from Germany to all NATO Brothers and Sisters.
As long as we stick together the big mouths from russia and china cannot harm us.
Помогите Украине и вам будет на страшна Россия.
لهاذا روسيا غزت اوكرانيا و حلف الناتو يشاهد ويستعرض قواته في مواقع التواصل فقط
Мы уже вам навредили, вредим и будем вредить!))))
@@uENZOu Гов на уРиНе)))
Yeah man, Russian and Chinese weapons are shit, I've heard. But the people there are great. Not the government
オワコンと言われて何十年の機関砲が今大注目。分からないもんだよね、兵器の有効性って。。
高性能のロボット兵器よりも単純な機械の方が信頼性は高いからねぇ…。
Tudo depende do calibre de cada arma, calibres maiores percorrem distâncias maiores, depende da cadência de tiros de cada arma e depende de um bom sistema de radar para alvos pequenos, neste caso abater drones e mísseis. O Gepard, que é um sistema antiaéreo alemão e não romeno, é de extrema eficàcia, testado na Ucrânia, abatendo até misseis de cruzeiro da Rússia. Já o sistem antiaéreo da Polônia e da Romênia queria mais informações também. O Avenger dos EUA tem calibre baixo, aparentemente eles demoram para abater um drone.
実は影が薄かっただけで 防空コンプックスの最終迎撃手段としては普通に重要な装備として使われ続けたりする。
特にC-RAMとしてはドローン登場以前からバリバリ現役で使われてた。
United we stand, divided we fall ...
nahh
yahh
Стоят горы, а люди это ничтожество ! Вы падаете в любом случае !😂😂😂
@@рамонрамон-ъ3н didn't you have to use weapons and ammunition from North Korea? lmao
the Gepard looks the scariest ... not even in a tank i would feel very safe with that thing shooting at me
Looking is one thing, being anything good, is another... Ghepard was so easy destroyed in Ukr, by cheap drones...
@@mirandela777Almost no losses so bullshit.
And wait for the Skynex fucking up every drone
@@mirandela777 Gepard war nicht in GB. Es war der "Marksman".... welche Drohne hat in GB einen Marksman zerstört? und wann?
@@mirandela777 Yes, destroyed unlike the glorious... wait, every single piece of anti-air and every single sort of vehicle was destroyed by cheap drones on both sides. "Drones can destroy it" is not a way to evaluate the quality of anything. S400's, S300's, ZSU's, Buk's, Tor's, every tank on Earth have been destroyed up by drones. The Patriot has not been destroyed yet, but that's not because of it's quality, it just hasn't been located yet, a swarm of drones can destroy any vehicle. Until direct energy weapons become common, it will stay like that.
0 have bine destroyed by drones@@mirandela777
If I were in the lighthouse, I'd be terrified.
Gepard ist immer noch eindrucksvoll und wirksam.
Meanwhile... Russia's nearly reduced to tractors and wheelbarrows.
In your dream
@@greenarmy1982no need to dream. It is a wonderful reality.
nono, täusch Euch nicht, das dauert.. und Russland produziert weiter
О чём ты? Клоун
@@greenarmy1982no need to dream buddy reality is already happening supplying soldiers with cardboard body armor and guns from 200 years ago that have a fail rate 😂😂😂😂
ドローン対策はやっぱり銃弾。ミサイルはコスパが悪い。空自はVADSを再運用した方がいい
もう溶かしちゃって鉄の塊にしちゃったんじゃない？
Yeah, but not just bullets. Germany used the "Skyranger Gun" for Drones. It shoots explosive projectile with timer.
Its not really explosiv, its just sets free a large mass of ironballs free similiar to an claymore mine@@-Priat-
@@-Priat- AHEAD Ammo
Honestly I can also see defensive drones being used as well.
GREETINGS FROM ROMANIA ❤❤❤❤
AA Guns are so powerful!
戦争を知らない若造だからかもしれないけど、前時代的な兵器ってなんかロマンがあってカッコいいよなぁ
jebeš rat! jedan sam preživio i ne želim više.Pozdrav iz Hrvatske
Да 😂😂😂😂? Особенно когда НАТО использует это оружие против женщин и детей!😂 Романтика!
@@рамонрамон-ъ3н女性も子供その意思があったらどうするの？
ウクライナでは子供も女性も参加しています
誰も嫌がっていません。
@@рамонрамон-ъ3нyou really don’t know what your country is doing in Ukraine right now killing women and children
1:56 imagine is they gane that to the Marines.
How many guys would sit on the radar dish and have contests to see how long you can hold on.. 😂
Parabens para a romaniam e a todos paises aliados que defendem a ucrania e todos os paises da direita
Those 35mm rounds are huge!
I feel like air defense is the most important thing going forward. Wars are fought with missiles drones fighter jets more so than before
FIRE
I know pointing with that yellow flag is the icing on the cake……
"War its Fantastic" Hot Shots Part Deux lol
Defending from whom? Those weapons are not in Ukraine, so they are not repelling anyone.
Nice
This typa anti air sure took dozens of zeros back in the day
Hello Japanese people from America ❤
These are huge ammunition cartridges looks like they have caught up with production?
Kinetics are old news. We need photonics to complement the kinetics to deal with small agile buggers.
ドローン落としたの見るとやっぱ対空砲は大事だな
Menuda potencia y precisión
why tf everyone here speaking the language of dinosaurs 💀
Gephard almost musical.
35mm rounds are fking huge!
Giant guns on wheels what could be cooler
Man, The US is slacking when it comes to anti aircraft vehicles, i think its time we replace the humvees
imagine this in ai operated..scary
Let's face it though. Those Gepards are German built.
日本も87式高射砲を引っ張り出すしかないんじゃないかな。
それか16式の車体を流用して新しく作るとか。
いまはどっちかって言うと高出力レーザーシステムやマイクロ波の方に注力してるな レーザーに関しては16MCVファミリーで車載テストもやってる。
Saya Lebihh Tertarikk Produk" Russia Yg Semakinnn Canggihhh,,
These systems look dated. I know the Gepard is originally first deployed in the 1960’s but is a beast.
With radar and fire control geared for anti drone, the guns on these old units will be given new life.
The U S is way behind due to their doctrine of establishing air superiority before the age of drone warfare. But they are working hard to get up to date.
That Polish 23 mm open top gun looks like 1960’s leftover Soviet equipment.
The British have a laser weapon….
I agree, they are dated - but some of the new fire control systems aren't. You're right about the US being behind because of their air dominance plans - but also because once slow air started carrying cannons and AT missiles with a range of up to 5 km or more, AAA becomes pretty useless. The drones are a whole new issue, but honestly I think multiple chain driven.50 cals with a good fire control and radar is a good/cheap way to go for close in defense. High energy jammers will likely be the first thing they field (in various forms), and then they will begin launching counter battery fire at the drone's controllers by following the signal (like HARMs do with radar).
Gepard look-alike systems are really cool. In that regard I think russians have a better understanding but their systems suck
Protect the west. AT ALL COST.
I was in the Italian Army in 1997 whit M113 SIDAM
夜間での射撃シーンは08小隊のOPじゃねぇか！
嵐の中で輝く～♪
輝き撃ちやめい
Oerlikon, Swiss Made Gun and system is the best.
Do they use proximity fuses to better hit a target? Those with gunners outside how are they affected when it rains or snows on them?
What are the first couple vehicles in the beginning?
Was ein Quatsch, als ob feine am Horizont hin und her Fliegen bis sie abgeschossen werden.
J'avou que la combinaison lance missiles et mitraillette à la fin est ça coche. 👽 En plus sur des Jeep Hamer , donc très mobile, bref ça coche 👽.
Ducks loves that
Philippines must have this! So if China flies like they own everything. They could be pulverize😅
wow,👍👍👍🇵🇭🇵🇭🇵🇭
America needs to step it up here....the Avenger is the least impressive AA I have ever seen.
In addition to its chain gun the Avenger also carries missiles. this particular training unit did not have them equipped. The Avenger has laser and infrared technology to identify and track targets and its dual launchers can carry a total of eight heat-seeking Stinger missiles.
Yeah we definitely need to step it up, we have the biggest military budget but the least intimidating vehicle here
@@jamesnoonan2009 Seriously though, all that money spent, and it doesn't even look cool. hahaha
the Avenger is mainly a missile launcher, the M3P .50 cal is more of a last resort limited self defense weapon
@@SmoggyFroggy the Avenger is quite old though but we are fielding a new Stryker system
AAGuns like gepard can't stop fpv mini drones, and larger drones like bayraktar can destroy them from afar.
There are several videos of ukrainian AAgun systems shooting iranian cruise missiles and drones but SAM missiles are more effective with longer range.
ACK-ACK!
would it be better if they had common denominator
Is Romanian Army the new name for Germany?
Romania was (almost) the last country which used Gepard until Germans gave some to Ukraine. In Germany was retired more or less.
Nightime in stormy weather?
How tf erone rollin with 20+ up to 35 mm triple and double barrels and then there's U.S. single barrel 12.7 mm....what's that about?
Thank goodness the Gepard has a flashing orange warning light to remind folk to 'Beware'.
its german safety rule ;-D
👊🏼❤️🇪🇺🇺🇸🇪🇺❤️👊🏼
火力は全てを解決する
What drone???
👍
It’s not whole NATO where NATO is defending these days. You also have Australia and Turkey outside of Europe so EU frontier is not more important than thise 2 countries.
防空はまかせろー(バリバリ)
Why are all the comments in Japanese?
This is a Japanese channel
@@LentPanic7 I never knew that, thanks!
Because they are our allies and brothers!With respect from Romania!
The US Army with its pee-shooter; 12.7 mm anti-Aircraft gun??? Come on; might as well use a .44 Magnum!
The Avenger platform also carries 8x Stinger MANPADS, which are very effective at taking down drones
the thing is the us does not have a dedicated triple a platform ,I think the m6 lineback was suppose to be it but it didn't work out ( I dont know why)
The US military relies on complete air dominance wherever they are deployed. The pee-shooter is for drones. All these other anti-aircraft guns would be obliterated before they fired a shot.
@@zfg_daur3612 with thousands of drones, missiles is a like a baseball bat vs bugs
Croatia had the best not going to lie lol
Would it hit a B-17?
...hay algo que no entiendo, de verdad todos esos cayones de rafagas realmente tienen chance ante un misil lanzado desde un caza a unos 10 o 15Km de distancia?
You don't understand that those were destined for low flying targets, helicopters in general, but after the war in Ukraine became evident they are very useful against drones. Apparently Gepard are very good to missiles too (in Ukraine!)
These thinga cant possibly shoot down modern fighter or ground attack jets can they? I feel like these would be more for shooting down rotary aircraft and propellar cargo planes like c-130s and c-17’s.
Next year will be worst year for all.
Ooops just a bird, false alarm…
Rip bird
nada que un sub sonico no pueda romper ..
I am embaresed with the outdated military hardware that Croatian army is useing and to think that we are a part of NATO with such equipement.
Why is the Commander of the Gerard is that far out of turret??…. Show pony
7:38 Weren't the Americans supposed to shoot the drone? Then how come they missed it so many times before finally shooting it down? If it was a kamikaze drone, they'd all be dead.
Thats why you practice.
米軍はM163を復帰させたりはしないんでしょうか？さすがに古すぎますかね。
12.7㎜ならM16対空自走砲で良いのでは？と思いました。
M163絶対使える。対歩兵なら7.62mm防げる装甲車があればあればあるほどいい。
対戦車ミサイルや重機関銃を防御する能力はないけど、装軌式で走破性もあってウクライナにはうってつけ。
対ドローン、対歩兵、対軽装甲気動車に友好的
@@酒之不埒 20mmバルカン一門の方がいいのか、12.7㎜四連装の方がいいのか…
完全な装軌装甲車の方がいいのか、はたまた手軽で速度の速いハーフトラックの方がいいのか…
実戦では何が有効なのかはテストじゃわかんないからねぇ
no, verschrottet
もう代替手段が存在してる。
IM-SHORADとかM-LIDSで検索
Cold War tec working now days?
Jet get faster every day
1 искандер - минус вся шушера на видео😅, клоуны.😂
Выкинь на помойку истории свпй кривой искандер 👌🥴🥴🥴
Горячий привет искандеру от Himars 👌💥🔥🤣☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️
europes at war who knew
Tråiascå Romania si Nato
ما توصل ربع قوة الشلگا ☕️
Creo que los cañones bofors podrían bolver a la vida proyectiles de metralla contra los drones
These drones are so stupid. They don't even know how to launch missiles in the air.
🎖️
Now a days nothing is vulnerable everthing can be destroyed so dont go to war its useless better be on peace side.😮😮😮
Lo que me encanta de la GUERRA son los DRONES pequeños por que es el futuro del planeta!!
Los DRONES pequeños pueden volar a baja altura y por detras pueden destruir a todos los vehiculos que se ve en el video..