US Powerful Submarine Torpedo Destroys Massive US Navy Ship During Training
ฝัง
- เผยแพร่เมื่อ 23 ก.พ. 2024
- Welcome back to The Daily Aviation for a feature on how the US Navy conducts live-fire torpedo training on old decommissioned warships.
Voice, text and video editing belong to The Daily Aviation, any use of these content without permission is forbidden.
Don't forget to subscribe us on Facebook or Twitter.
/ dailyaviationarchive
/ dailymda
You have a question or you would like to send us footage. Send us a message.
![[TH] VCT Pacific Stage 2 - Week 2 Day 1 // RRQ vs TLN | DRX vs PRX](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/_OWt_-Lu3AE/mqdefault.jpg)
Our company designed the sensory electronics for the Mk48 torpedo. I was one of the design engineers, and later for testing the actual performance. Originally the MK48 was intended to have a nuclear warhead, and the entire weapons section was short and lightweight. Due to treaties, the Navy altered it have only a conventional explosive warhead. This dramatically changed the weight distribution, made it heavier, and as a result it had less range, less speed, and clumbsier to handle. We analyzed hundreds of runs against both surface ships and submarines, and delivered the algorithms as to where the best explosive power was delivered. Submarines are tough to defeat, since the torpedo may go along side, below, or above the target, at varying angles, aspect ratios, and varying closure speeds (including nose-on as in the movie). However, I guarantee that the MK48 is able to handle all of these, and there is no escape unless you are basically out of range, and if that, the Captain is a fool for firing and wasting it.
7:21
Ahh, The good old days and sure missing those days when active at sea. Sure do miss that life ! The bigger the boom the better the day is/was, LOL.
So basically, the sub has to follow the target for 7 days, because that's how long it takes to load a torpedo.
I think you're spot on 😂
The most powerful Man in the World is not the President of The United States, but the Captain of a Nuclear Submarine....
The prez still commands the captain but If captain went rogue, then yes he/she/it will be the most powerful person in the world.
@@O.G.KeV.I imagine they have some sort of computer failsafe to prevent that now
@@joshr8666 lol
"Man has not power, but responsibility." - Tuscarora
@@O.G.KeV.Nope. Subs can't arm nukes without the codes.
A couple points, more than just Mk 48 torpedoes are used in the video. Harpoon and some other systems are used as well. One way you can tell the difference is the explosion. IF the ship rises up and snaps in half, it is a torpedo. Mk 48 is designed to break the keel of a ship, i.e. snap it into two distinct pieces. Harpoon and other missiles are designed to hole the ship and blow it apart from the inside out. It may take 2-3 Harpoons depending on the ship, its armor and where the missile penetrates. For most ships it only takes ONE Mk 48 torpedo to break it in half. Ships the size of aircraft carriers etc, may take a second torpedo or more depending on size tonnage and mass. But whatever ship it is, unless they have a top rated damage control crew, the ship is likely to sink even if it does not literally snap in half. I am former United States Navy Active, now medically retired due to service connected injuries as of 2014.
Thank you for your service and taking one for the country I hope your injuries have healed.
Thank you for a very educational and informative video.
Watchin this and other NAVY posts gives me comfort as my 27 yr. old son serves our country aboard the USS Theodor Roosevelt CVN71.
Et vous avez envoyé deux bombes atomiques sur des civils innocents,votre karma vous rattrapera tôt ou tard,vous êtes tellement bon que vous vous massacrez entre vous tous les jours,Einstein a dit des ricains,( les américains sont passés de la barbarie à la décadence sans connaître la civilisation !!!!) .
I'm sure you are proud of him. And you should be.
My son is on the TR as well!
@@easternecho1622
thank you 🙏
@@user-ih2nc5ul4i
thank you 🙏 Hoo ya!
Impressive and mind blowing. The sub torpedoes are surgically precise -- like everything else the Navy does. ♥
If you want to be extra impressed, that Oliver Hazard Perry class frigate would have kept going after that first hit, had there been a crew aboard. That first hit was above the waterline. And the Samuel B. Roberts took a lot worse than that in 1988.
The last ship I served on was an OHP class frigate. FFG 37 out of Pearl. She was decommissioned after I left her and it wasn't too many years ago that she met the same fate as many of the ships in this video. There really isn't any better way for a retired warship to go.
The U.S. may have launched its first ballistic missile submarine in '57, but it wouldn't have had any missiles. Lockheed's first successful sub launch of the Polaris missile wasn't until late '59 or early '60. My grandfather worked on that after retiring from the Navy. He had a big certificate commemorating the launch.
So much technology, so many ressources, so much know-how we would need to HEAL the world instead of destroying it.
The Harpoon is back in the sub inventory !! Finally.
Best part of torpedo and harpoon tests ... more berthing space for taller guys to stretch out their legs after duty hours.
You would think the process would be faster to simulate battle speed.
despite all those electronics and who knows what other fanzy gadgets they have, it is still paper and pencil and every detail written down, the favorite means of control or command.
очень крутая лодка. Прекрасное оружие империи.
This is just like going to the shooting range with a host of new weapons...The target is toast! All I can say beyond that is that ISN'T THIS A LITTLE OVERKILL, BOYS? LMFAO!
Remember exercise JTFEX 01-2? It was in 2001 when the German stealth submarine U-24 “sunk” the “USS Enterprise”?
The submarine passed all the security ships and surfaced right next to the aircraft carrier, having fictitiously sunk it. The assessment of a submarine always depends on its intended purpose
"Fictitiously sunk" Ok.....Is that like almost pregnant? Almost won?
does this mean that warships are obsolete because to vulnerable ? i am reading of warships heavily damaged by unmanned speedboats in the black sea
I wonder what they could do of them new gen missiles ,,, swiss cheese ?
four 16RP200-1-CM engines per boat, each rated at 3,350 brake horsepower.
The last sighting of the mighty USS Denver LPD-9.
"Reload torpedo!" Cue Jeopardy Theme.
The slowness of the process was the biggest surprise and take away for me. I know torpedoes are big and heavy, but surely this can be sped up.
Sinkex is the most fun I ever had on a Boat
Gut so !
الصحه والعافيه
Oaprey is called aswell a widowmaker...
THIS IS WHY NO SHIPS NO MATTER HOW POWERFUL OR LARGE THEY ARE CAN EVER WITHSTAND TORPEDOES!!
So I guess the enemy has to wait 45 min to get shot at
how do such young people operate and maintain all of this stuff? im thinking at least 15yrs experience to feel comfortable
Also are there torpedos loaded in the tubes at all times ready to be used? My guess is due to safety reasons. And, there isn’t too much to show us because of security reasons and surprises for the enemy.
The big thing is that this is an exercise in safe waters. This is not a ship at battle stations or anywhere near an enemy combatant.
Esto servirá para realizar alguna buena película que tal vez Hollywood ya solicito y pago
using After Ships Donation please .... 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢😢 from 🇱🇰 srilanka we have a only 7 Ships😢
It also costs a massive amount of money to man and maintain a large ship.
@@vapoetyes
I'm a plankowner USS Horne DLG-30
She sat in the San Francisco mothball fleet for years and towed to Hawaii for cinque pac.
Word was she didn't want to sink..missile strike blew a hole midship..all the way through..
It seems to me that a total refit of such a large hull, such as the one sunk, would be more cost effective and faster than building something new. Or a partial refit then put it up for sale to Allies. I mean, if the Chinese can turn the Varyag into a supposed threat why couldn’t Iceland buy it and double its fleet or Philippines buy it, weld it to the Sierra Madre on the Second Thomas Shoal and double the “landmass.”
You can do that to a point. But after a certain age, no one will want them, and these type of exercises are often more important to readiness than a few extra bucks in the pocket.
Watching how long it takes them load a single torpedo asks how long does it really take in combat
In combat, the tubes are already loaded.
90% of the loading bits in the video were the UGM-84 which is the Harpoon missile. Harpoons take a bit more time to load than a standard heavyweight torpedo given the extra steps.
Was that a Perry Class Frigate?
They were a fantastic class of ship, inexpensive, but as you can see that they can take a punch. Look up the story of the Samuel B Roberts and Operation Praying Mantis.
@@vapoet I have to ask my cousin to see if he was on the Roberts, I was on a Knox class Frigate USS Donald B Beary FF1085
God help our enemies!
I saw a few missiles being launched from the launch tank, but their power was not as powerful as a torpedo
Does the torpedo come in next video?
6:52 Tiger Woods popped onboard to give assistance
Seems like it takes a bit of time to ready the weapon is this always the case?
It would be nice to see some new footage of torpedo firing instead of the same rehashed vid presented as such.
there's probably nothing to see? its a woosh of bubbles out of the tube
I would guess the procedure is the same or very close to the same in all subs. The concern I would have by the time the torpedo is loaded and ready to fire it’s too late for the sub and crew.
It also to me indicated the torpedo is not "locked and loaded"
YUP< LOL.
I know these test are necessary, but couldnt you just ironclad an old fishing boat for simple tests? That tank lander does not look that old or in bad shape. It seems like such a waste when we could sell it to another country or outfit it as a backup.
I am a Navy veteran and retired Army 1SG. In the Navy I enlisted as an STS but, in sub school I found out, had no clue, that I was claustrophobic. They redid my contract for STG and it was back to San Diego and FLEASWTRACENPAC for STG “C” school. Aboard my destroyer the TM’s were in my division. As were the GMT’s for the ASROC. I wanted subs badly but, that was the 2nd of life’s great letdowns. Switched to the Army with sights set on SF and made it through SFAS but, blew my ACL in the 18D “Q” course. 3rd letdown. 🤔🥴 have to love the Bubble Heads. 🫡
How come the flag is still flying? Goes down with the ship?
Uhm... yeah... that's a Frigate, the SMALLEST US Blue Water ship we had... and all of those were retired for the Little Crappy Ship (LCS). Though we've started building "Frigates" again that are the same size as our Destroyers...
Senjata canggih....tapi tak pernah menang perang
Do you know chinese hypersonic torpedoes?..
7:26
Once I saw a vid of a naval fire fight in the Indian ocean with modern weapons .and that was scary crazy... Now nations are 10 times more armed so imagine
guy on pad like wwowo slow down.he has never fly a helicopter. guy totally relaxed and know how to fly like that.😂 derrr
imgina q coisa linda isso entrando num navio russo
Great show , how do you compare against Sweden? 😂
Just fine overall.
FOR JETS TAHT FLYS IN FROM A LAND BASE THEIR LAND JET FUEL JP-3 IS SOUCKED OUT PUT IN A HOLD TANK AND REPLACES WITH JP-5.... JP-5 IS LESS BOOM BOOM . THEN JP-3,ALL SHIPS CARRIES DIESEL / JP-5 AND JP-8. WHICH IS THE LATEST ONE... FOR JETS WITH IN THE SHIP/ DIESELS
حتا احنا اليمنين بانعيد لكم تجارب كثير
Then they will tell you too 😂
Are you a Hootie?
The process for loading and arming the munitions in the torpedo tubes seems very complex and in the heat of battle, maybe a little too complex.
They don’t reload during combat, they have 8 tubes loaded during war. They’re used for hit and run, and hunting specific targets.
What is the point in showing any of this stuff to our enemies ? Un less it is all old news that they already know about .
There will come a day when battery technology will power subs on long missions. No diesel-electric, just electric. I'm sure the US Navy is keeping abreast of evolving battery technology, and maybe even funding it. Once someone comes up with that battery our subs will be as quiet as a mouse pissing on a cotton ball.
So what decides using a torpedo or missile to destroy a surface ship ?
Just a guess I would say range to target thinking a missile likely has greater range.
Size of the ship, presence of hostile air assets, distance to target, amount of screening ships, potential presence of hostile submarines, etc.
The ladder at 13:39 is not suitable for purpose and should be replaced with a better more stable design. There are options, that one looks like it sucks.
Bull that Perry class Frigate took 2 cruise missiles bombs and a torpedo. It didn’t sink till 2nd torpedo
Isto é uma demonstração de poder e precisão aos seus inimigos, em particular a China.
Old school conventional warfare instruments and weapons. The future of war is in chemistry and biology like weaponized DNA altering pandemics etc.
Ahh the ship too two hits. No crew on board to fight the fires and flooding. I didn't see her sinking. Got assume despite the pretty sparks this ship would still be in the fight.
if they only they made our cars like this
América 🇺🇲💪💪💪👌
Com essa lentidão já teriam sido afundado
cadê os abrahams na guerra da ucrania?
Esercitazioni GREEN !!!!
What's going on with the hair and shave @ 3:30 ?
Protect the earth.
im just suprised this clip art video had 1.2 million views
These things could be immensely improved with narration... the little captions gimmicks are a pita.
they're naan
What ever the hell 'naan' means... even so, narration would still be a trivial to implement improvement.
@@rwbishop I thought we were naming types bread. You started it with pita. I added naan. Your turn - maybe go with bagel?
Grow up.
@@rwbishop OK, so sourdough then.
man that's too slow loading a torpedo and frightening to be that slow
Hate to tell you, Submarines aren't the only vessels with torpedoes. Your site is good for a laugh though
Может быть это видео и хорошее по своему Но кто нибудь задался вопросом - для чего создавать все эти смерти если все за мир
This weaponry is created to deter others from attempting to attack, the losses of personnel and military equipment would just be too great. Therefor it creates the illusion of peace with nobody wanting to make a move, but without that there would be no peace with the dictators of this world.
thats not a torp thats a harpoon missle
Watch Das Boot much better submarine film. Or HMS Conquer sinking an actual target in a real war and then escaping antisubmarine maneuvers.
Why destroyed why not sell it to allies
I had a student in my class who had worked on subs for the Navy. He told me what they would do on the 6 month missions. It was drilling holes in weapons to extract the alcohol from inside. Of course no alcohol, no gps). When the sub returned to Virginia, they occasionally had to fire a missile, but with no alcohol for the gyroscope, the missile would go all over the place. He laughed when he told me. I didn’t think it was funny at all.
He was lying.
Nothing like being in a tube with 100+ other members of crew and wearing a mask thinking it will help LMFAO
God forbid you had to shoot a torpedo fast!!
Ha the war/conflict would be over by the time the prepped and fired the thing.
Ship has a wake but no propeller froth.
Just how gullible do you think we are.
이거 어뢰 실험이예요? 아니면 튼튼한 군함 장갑 실험이예요 ? ^ ^ 오히려 ^ ^ 어뢰 성능보다 ------> " 군함의 장갑 방어력 " 이 월등히 좋아 보입니다.. ㅋㅋ
いつも九三式酸素魚雷とどっちが威力あるんやろ？って思ってしまう
Seharusnya kapal sebagai target dibuat bergerak biar seperti kondisi perang sebenarnya. Masa iya nembak target diem kagak kena.
Can you smell it?
Strong ship did not go down easily.
That frigate class were tough little ships.
"The Honeywell PHD6 is a state of the art multi-gas detector."
In this age of modern technology they still use a periscope when they can just put a mast with cameras that can rotate 360 degrees connected to monitors inside the sub. All they have to do is look at the monitors, no need to peek through and rotate the periscope everytime.
They do have very high yes CCD cameras on/in the scopes. Study this a bit better.
@n3qq4he7u I'm not even talking about CCD. What I'm referring to is a mast with a mounted camera that can also be raised or retrieved connected to a monitor or computer screen that eliminates the hugging of periscope with your face to scan the areas above water. All you need is to look in the monitor or computer screen. Same principle with Apache and tanks where they have screens that show the target. I've seen one in an SSGN sub before so I don't know why they don't convert all of them.
@@PurpleHaze4me Redundancy, Why not have both if one fails hopefully the other wont.
USS KINCAID va t il être décommissionné ?...us Navy " The man who escaped "...
Kincaid was sunk as a target 15-20 years ago.
А Соссия мощь!
You're living in a metal tube, but yeah, I'm sure the facemask helps...
Di Indonesia gak ada namanya Kapal perang yang di pesiunkan
Selama belum terbelah dua gak bakal berhenti di dinaskan biarpun mogok di LANAL😂
very old videos - USS Racine was sunk in 2018
Then they attribute pollution to cars
Maybe stop driving one then
천안함 사건이 어뢰? ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 저렇게 폭발하는데 어떻게 사람들이 살아남어? 정말 궁금함!
yo
The UGM-840-1 is a Harpoon anti-ship missile and it has a 488 pound warhead. I think.
潜水はまじロシア、中国やばいやん😢