I feel that you can have a simplified photo (like the tree at 3:35) but it has to either be in interesting light, or be interesting itself. Mads Peter Iverson for example has some rather minimalistic photos in his gallery but they're simple, but interesting at the same time ,either subject itself (a tree for example) is just interesting, or the light on an otherwise normal subject is interesting, so it can work, but there has to be some sort of interest. If it's just a picture of a tree in an open field on an overcast day (unless you're doing a black and white perhaps) yeah it may b too simple and possibly too boring to really attract the viewer's eye.
Good reminder for me, thanks I was an early adopter on Vero but left as it was just too boring and slow, I may take another look PS, I'm in Wales, if you're down this way I'll show you somewhere you'd love
Hi Josh - great video! I've just installed Vero on my phone and looked for you. Are you the Joshua Pegg who's recommending Grief is the Thing with Feathers? Photo doesn't look very much like you, so I'm wondering if it's you.
Hi Joshua, your videos are amazing and helping me a lot with my 200d ii. Can you make a video for the focus points and when to use which, also I notice that while I take picture looking into the view finder, I am not getting a sharp image. What should I do to improve? Thank you.
By the side of your viewfinder, there should be a small dial that you can turn. If you look through your viewfinder while you turn it, it should come into focus
Tag me in your simple photos 😁👉@thejoshuapeg
Keep up your tutorials they are great.
I think your channel is way underrated
Thanks man
Always have a subject, fill the frame, and remove negative space!!
I feel that you can have a simplified photo (like the tree at 3:35) but it has to either be in interesting light, or be interesting itself. Mads Peter Iverson for example has some rather minimalistic photos in his gallery but they're simple, but interesting at the same time ,either subject itself (a tree for example) is just interesting, or the light on an otherwise normal subject is interesting, so it can work, but there has to be some sort of interest. If it's just a picture of a tree in an open field on an overcast day (unless you're doing a black and white perhaps) yeah it may b too simple and possibly too boring to really attract the viewer's eye.
This was a fantastic talk, Joshua! Really great presentation!
Good reminder for me, thanks
I was an early adopter on Vero but left as it was just too boring and slow, I may take another look
PS, I'm in Wales, if you're down this way I'll show you somewhere you'd love
Very helpful. Thank you for sharing! I always enjoy your trips through the UK and beyond 😎📷
Thank you Joey 😁
Another great video Josh! Very helpful and inspiring!
Thank you John 😁
Hi Josh - great video! I've just installed Vero on my phone and looked for you. Are you the Joshua Pegg who's recommending Grief is the Thing with Feathers? Photo doesn't look very much like you, so I'm wondering if it's you.
Mine only has one ‘G’ in Peg 😁
Hi Joshua, your videos are amazing and helping me a lot with my 200d ii. Can you make a video for the focus points and when to use which, also I notice that while I take picture looking into the view finder, I am not getting a sharp image. What should I do to improve? Thank you.
By the side of your viewfinder, there should be a small dial that you can turn. If you look through your viewfinder while you turn it, it should come into focus
Is Vero available for PC's? I actually do very little work with my phone.
It is Joe, the software works really well