@@BrecklynFast A lot of people clown on digital foundry for zooming in because "it's pointless, and no one plays while zooming in" and shit like that. But in reality it's incredibly helpful for people watching the video on their phones or in TH-cam in general. TH-cam's file compression obliterates any sort of sharp detail and particles on videos, so zooming in helps bring those details back into the video and see clearly what they're talking about
The best thing about this game is not the graphics. It's full crossplay support. I was playing it on PS5 with my friend who plays it on his PC thru Epic store. Virtually zero issue.
@@ea8455 sony has been doing cross play since 2002ish on ps2 with pc and with xbox in 2008 in SOME games, mostly mmos, i played ffxi on ps2 with pc players in 2004, and with xbox360 players in 2008 while cross play ended in 2012ish or 13 ish with xbox(idk why tho) it still ran untill ps2 support ended in 2018. also Black desert online has cross play with xbox and ps...........these do happen in most games mostly 3rd party games. the big problem is when you have to let either team into your network(i think it works on mmos becuase you DO NOT need any service xbox live or ps plus to use the mmos and they use there own servers)
I never use the 120fps option for BL3 or Wonderlands, it comes at the expense of blurry text - the text (UI, descriptions, labels etc.) in these games is just too important to sacrifice.
My BL 3 and Doom Eternal 120fps mode looks completely fine on my 24 inch 1080p Monitor. But if u play on a 69 inch TV then, yes, it won't look pretty. lol
I remember a year ago when you guys looked at DMC 5 on next gen looking at the very first instance of 120fps on console. The frame time graph was basically a rollercoster and you guys were still pretty impressed even with all the setbacks made. now a year later and we're running games like this at a much smoother 120 fps and its amazing how well devs are starting to optimize for 120fps on console. I can only imagine the future where we can see a native 1440p at 120fps, i have no doubt a couple more years and we could see it happen in a game as large as this one.
@@andrewsqual There will always be different graphical modes, im just saying in a few more years we could see less setbacks in performance modes. Especially when we see next gen exclusive games become the new norm allowing devs to squeeze so much more power out of this hardware.
Doom Eternal runs a locked 120hz at resolutions *above* 1440p on PS5 and Series X. It's no slouch with the visuals either, I would argue it is visually more complex than any Borderlands game. And yes, Doom Eternal is an outlier. But my point is that that level of performance is *already* available, and that it's therefore possible for other games to achieve the same results.
@@earnistse4899 exactly. Even if a game has a mode locked to 30 now, just have a separate “unlock to 60” toggle. And for games/modes at 60, that becomes an “unlock to 120” mode. Or instead just one extra toggle, that just unlocks whatever mode up to 120
Love the Assault on Dragon Keep soundtrack. Wonderlands has some great songs, but that original dlc soundtrack is amazing and it's great to hear it here.
@Garrus Vakarian yeah, I didn't notice as much speeding through the campaign other than a couple atmospheric tracks I think are good, but listening to the soundtrack is a bit of a letdown after the Assault on Dragon Keep. I guess the areas are bigger so they decided to make it more minimalistic?
Love you guys and all you do! Could you please consider direct comparisons between the standard versions and the more expensive “next gen” versions? Maybe even a long form vid including several titles now that we’re seeing more and more titles requiring and extra 10 bucks and often for just one version of the game? Comparisons including load times, resolution, performance, etc when both versions are installed on our fancy new SSDs? Tiny Tina is one of a growing number of games asking us to pay more while getting less details (or more vague ones) as to what we’re getting for our money. With others giving us the “optimized” version for free, it’s frustrating not knowing if the only thing we’re actually paying for is that precious “optimized for” version of the game tile/icon. Thanks. And thank you so much for continuing to speak my language when it comes to gaming.
the game experiences severe dips on PC as well - just by moving the crosshair from North to East in Brighthoof (Wonderlands' Sanctuary) can lead to ~20 FPS drop - from 50 to 30...
I still don't get why they haven't added the dynamic res mode to the PC version. Gtx1060 get over 80 in some areas , and below 60 even on sub 1080p in some spots. Some variable settings would really be helpful here .. And they only did it in the console versions:(
@@00ivatsa the entirety of the cutscenes and unbearable "wait for characters to stop talking" scenes make BL3 virtually unplayable after a first playthrough. They're bad enough the first time.
It's weird they just said in the coming month. I still think there is a hardware issue and it is going to be limited compared to Xbox. The Sony TV VRR is not very good compared to LG for a start.
I love this game for what it is. Taking the framework of B3 and putting a fun spin on it. I would have loved if they dropped the guns and fully committed to the fantasy.. but I understand what they were going for and you can feel the budget, time, and design constraints. They did a great job with what they had
@@Rebelscum264 different weapons. Granted I'd prefer guns and special melee weapons. There are a lot of cool things that can be done but they seem heavily restricted. They don't even get paid by randy so 🤷♂️
Still feeling that lack of 1440p support on PS5. Would be nice to be able to play at 1440p instead of 4K on resolution mode and get an even smoother 60fps lock. I tried the 1080p mode out but apparently I've been spoiled by 1440p because I couldn't handle it and switched back to 4K right quick.
Series S hitting its target. I sure wish this channel would give a $299 machine props for these kind of efforts. It’s meeting what was promised to its audience and consumers here.
I wonder what TTW could've been like if they went even further into the medieval setting and instead of guns used procedural bows, swords, crossbows, things like that
@@Notsram77 but that's because it's not an alternate universe or anything, it's an in universe ''B&B'' game. it's pretty much a joke on when real life D&D games just half-copy names of real life things for their games. it's not that it was lazy or anything, it was intentional
This was an eye opener in terms of graphical power for the 3 consoles. I had a series S up until November of last year until I decided to trade it in for a series X. I thought I was absolutely fine gaming on it but this really highlighted the differences. And I was fine but I just loved my series S so much and wanted a console with a disc drive that I said why not... Anyways, great review.
My friends and I have enjoyed it a lot so far, much more so than BL3. That said, the servers are shit right now if you're trying to play co-op. We started yesterday and have been seeing comments that issues have been going since launch so yeah lol
they easily could too but nah... That's also pretty much why black ops 3 is high on my list of fun PC games not the game itself it has built in splitscreen on PC... like tf?
On the PC it's a stutter nightmare in the open world with RTX 3080 i9 10850K 32gb 3200mhz RAM- tried everything including full reinstall of windows and swapping out hardware. Devs need to optimise better!
Some people reported a lot of stutter on Borderlands 3, never had much of an issue myself. Try to limit the frame rate in Nvidia control panel "starting" low to say 60 fps if you are on 1440P. A drop from say 130fps to 90 fps in a demanding scene can be jarring in many games, its better to restrict the highs even if you have a variable refresh display.
I think if the developers wanted to enable 120fps on Xbox series s, they'd have to drop the resolution to 720p, judging from how much the resolution drastically decreases from 4k to 1080p on Xbox series X/ps5 in 120fps mode, which is not worth it.
All I know is that on Series X in Resolution Mode, playing as a Spellshot, the frame rate was absolute ass in certain areas. One example off the top of my head was Mount Craw. In an intense firefight against elemental goblins with wyverns flying overhead, flinging spells and firing elemental weapons, the frame rate would regularly drop sub-30. It was painful enough that I swapped over to Performance mode, but on a 4K TV that mode looks like someone smeared everything with a thin layer of Vaseline. I digress. Between the performance issues, the short length of the campaign, and the lackluster end game that feels dated (yet another horde mode design, yaaaaaaaaaay /s), this really should have been a budget title, not a $60-$70 one.
I had an issue with Guardians of the Galaxy on Series X where the frame rate dropped really bad. Easily below 30fps. However it turned out to be an issue with the game being in Quick Resume. As when I quit the game and restarted it the game ran solid in the exact same sections of the game.
You should never buy these games on launch. I bought BL3 like 3 or 4 months ago and got it for about 40 to 60 dollars with every single DLC included and a bunch of fixes and upgrades over 2 years. Absolutely worth every penny and I would have not have enjoyed it as much if I payed more for less of an experience at launch. I'll probably be playing this in a year or so and will be rewarded massively for waiting. Games like these depend on having a robust endgame and they never have that quite worked out at launch.
@@nonyabusiness6084 Yeah i had Cricket 22 corrupt my save game and it turned out it was due to Quick resume lol. I was in match 6 of a career innings too. Lost the lot.
I’m loving this game! I’m a huge fan of the series, but the emphasis on D&D, with spells replacing grenades really mixes things up. Can’t wait to see what they come up with for DLC!
So basically nothing to worry about buying rn if you own Series S console. No next gen enhancements for Series S consoles BUT they DO give you the next gen price tag of $70 smackers. Oh JoY!
@@infinitysynthesis not from my knowledge, the most they have end game is Chaos mode which is similar to Borderlands Mayhem mode. I haven't beat it tho so I'm not sure how that all works yet.
I love crisp images, i'm playing it on pc with no anti aliasing on at all for that native look with no TAA messing up the image. Not sure why people like blurred over vaseline games.
I remember FXAA completely broke the DoF in borderlands 2 and idk if that even got concluded or if anyone cared enough to fix it. The cell shading would just get confused or something
I think I'm the only one in the universe that doesn't see much difference between 60 and 120/144. I mean I see it but I don't think that it makes all that much difference, 30 to 60 on the other hand is a MASSIVE difference
DF should start including quick resume load times. It’s be interesting to see how much time that saves over loading the game from a new boot to vs quick resume.
I bought this game on series s and am enjoying it! The goofy nature and the nostalgia that I had with borderlands 3!(haven't played the first and the second)I don't find the humour really funny but that did not distract me from enjoying the game! Edit: correction, now on series x☺️!
The devs don’t consider using most of the rdna 2 features, and then they complain about the gpu although that tiny Tina is running ok on series s it could run better if developers cared
In the post game Chaos Chamber, the performance UTTERLY TANKS, even in the performance mode you see dips to sub-30. I have no idea why, it's a little arena without all that much going on but its performance just collapses. This being on XSX.
Ya know.. I'm still curious why in so many reviews of this game I haven't seen anyone compare or discuss how this is so much like the old Bunkers and badasses dlc from BL2. That was a really well done and touching story, and uses almost everything this one uses except this has the overworld map and the newer mechanics of bl3...
@@vaguedreams 2K did release the DLC as a standalone campaign a few months ago, so that should of been incentive for reviewers to check on the game that inspired the tiny tina game in the first place.
@@ramiking745 It's still a ten year old add on. I get what you're saying, but with so much new stuff out I can see people not bothering. It also doesn't hit the feels and looses a lot by not being tied to borderlands 2.
The Series S was heavily advertised as a next-gen 1440p 30fps machine with RT, and already so early in the generation it's already struggling. That really worries me, I can't imagine what it's going to look like 3-4 years from now
Yeah it's very worrying I brought a series s before I got my PS5, because stock was an issue. But then a week later I got my PS5 and gave back my series S 😂, while I like the S it's obviously running out of steam quite early.
Firstly this is running at a dynamic 1440p at 60fps. Secondly Microsoft always said it would support UP TO 1440p, not a locked 1440p. If you locked it to 30fps, it could absolutely hold 1440p in this game but 60 is preferable.
What are you talking about? It runs this game at 1080p-1440p & 60fps. Go try to get that performance on a PC for only $299. It is running this game exactly as it should. FSR will be implemented by the time actual next gen games start coming out. Oh, and no it was not advertised as a 1440p, 30fps machine with RT. It was advertised as a 1080p-1440p machine only. Nothing was said about frame rate and it is running games at 1080p-1440p, just as advertised.
Series S is the budget upgrade path for previous owners of vanillla Xbox One/S, and a budget mainstream Game Pass vessel. To hit the $299 MSRP, it was stripped of important GPU and memory specs -- raw compute units, bandwidth, VRAM quantity, etc. Thankfully they had no real choice but to leave the CPU largely intact - and in that area, it destroys the last-gen Jaguar cores, plus the SSD with hardware-accelerated decompression. The superior CPU opens opportunities for 60fps (and rarely 120fps) modes, the SSD+IO provides quick data transfer, but the weaker GPU/memory architecture certainly handicaps the best-case resolutions and visual presets on Series S. It's pretty decent kit for $299, though. Arguably better than any PC you could assemble for the price, and better than what $299 could buy an existing low end PC owners in terms of upgrades.
It's up to the developer to tweak the TAAU to their liking, they must have decided to change the default values and aimed for a clearer but more aliased image.
In engine there's TAA x 4, 8, 16, 32 and post color sampling with kernal softening, but I'd imagine consoles use 4x with sharpening filter which makes it look more aliased especially stretched on big TVs
@@TRONiX404 it’s not a console thing. Most UE4 titles have very effective TAA coverage on consoles. My guess is that Gearbox’s custom UE4 engine just isn’t very efficient - so they need to claw back some performance with lower quality TAA.
$70 for the Current Gen version is a pass for me (and should be for Series S owners). I'll wait until it drops in price or comes out on Gamepass/PSNow.
Holy hell that is a lot. I only paid £31 for my pc version. I guess you can sell the game after you have finished it to make a decent chunk of the money back.
I never use the 120fps option for BL3 or Wonderlands, it comes at the expense of blurry text - the text (UI, descriptions, labels etc.) in these games is just too important to sacrifice. If it was 1440p instead of 1080p then maybe... but from 4K to 1080p the text quality just ruins it.
It's not a problem for me since I have a 4K HDR 120 Hz TV And I have used 120 Hz mode in borderlands 3 and Tiny Tina's wonderlands Which they are upscaled at 4K HDR on PS5 they do not look blurry at all 😉👍
The games looks like a game from 5 years or so ago , simple mechanics , simple ai , average / below average for 2022 game the performance on pc is shit for the visual return simple mechanics
I bought this for ps5 and am somewhat disappointed with the game on a technical level. For charging $70, there's NO 3D AUDIO and NO Dual Sense support and the graphics are not really improved over Borderlands 3. It's also a spin off reusing lots of assets from B3. Should've at least had 3d audio and haptics though. I'm kinda pissed about that.
@@ElShmiablo bro what , the ps4 pro only got like 0.2 higher in teraflop count and thts it, series S is better in every other way, but I don’t have a lot of knowledge on series S, this is just what I know , plus series S is more advanced with the newer gpu architecture and better cpu
I wish they didn't just play the first two areas, wanted to see everything else, also do frame rate tests when your actually using some crazy higher level stuff.
Big surprise, Series S gets shafted again. I wish I could get a Series X and sell my S, I’m really not happy with all the compromises I’m seeing in every single game. If it was just a lower resolution as it was advertised I’d be perfectly happy, but there’s always very noticeable graphics and performance problems on almost every release.
Not sure what you were expecting from a $299 budget console. It is running this game at 1080p 60fps, which is absolutely fine for a $299 budget console. You can now pick up a Series X much easier. I get emails from Microsoft all the time. Check the Microsoft Store online.
@@nonyabusiness6084 I think the big issue is that it should perform better and devs just don't seem to make adjustments for it. 1080 at a locked 60 should be the minimum goal but they can't be arsed to do that. It supports VRR and 120fps. A performance mode for it should be included. They manage to provide setting on PC, I am unsure why they can't do that for todays consoles. It's kind of the same argument for having split screen on PC. Is it really that difficult to implement when they manage it on consoles?
You kept mentioning bl3.....it would of been nice to take 10 seconds to remind us what bl3 res/fps is/was with it's current updates. Just something fun and extra that would of been relevant. Good job tom.
120hz mode with no VRR, LMAO ,what's the point, fixed refresh Tv's are rubbish for gaming end of story, welcome to 7 years ago when G-Sync changed everything and made gaming better
I just hated that when I was playing the game would stutter and freeze for a second or two multiple times during gameplay! unplayable for me, and I'm not the only person who's encountered this issue
I'm honestly glad this exists, but I was pretty disappointed to see some of the same gun models from BL3 show up with new 'attachments'. I like what this is, but I wish it were even more distinct from Borderlands.
@@His0ka That's almost purely Randy "Hands-on" Pitchford. The company itself is just vanilla flavored garbage, inoffensive - but you can't think about what you're consuming.
Some unrealistic expectations for Series S. The SS is the budget upgrade path for previous owners of vanillla Xbox One/S, and a budget mainstream Game Pass vessel. To hit the $299 MSRP, it was stripped of important GPU and memory specs -- raw compute units, bandwidth, VRAM quantity, etc. all take a dive. Thankfully they had no real choice but to leave the CPU largely intact to allow for baseline new gen game handling, and in that area, the Series S destroys the last-gen Jaguar cores, plus the SSD with hardware-accelerated decompression is a pronounced advantage . The superior CPU opens opportunities for 60fps (and rarely 120fps) modes, the SSD+IO provides quick data transfer, but the weaker GPU/memory architecture certainly handicaps the best-case resolutions and visual presets possible on Series S. It's pretty decent kit for $299, though. Arguably better than any PC you could assemble for the price, and better than what $299 could buy an existing low end PC owner - in terms of 300 bucks of upgrades. It is the budget option, and seems to have sold well in that role. But we must be realistic about best case technical expectations for the Series S.
Anyone buying a Series S for $299 and complaining about the performance of any game should be slapped in the mouth and have their Series S taken away from them.
it's a bit more than 1/3rd of a Series X, a 4k machine, and designed to run games at 1440p (or 44% 4k) for tv's that in general are 1080p. 1080/60 and a 120 performance option should not be considered asking too much. Edit: Incorrectly wrote the SS is 2/3rds of a SX when it would be closer to 1/3rd. Also wrote 1440p is 2/3rds of 4k when it's more like 44%
@@vaguedreams We've definitely seen more complex AAA with a 60fps option on Series S compared to its predecessor One S. Hell, more than One X actually. (One X being spec'd for UHD resolutions at 30fps). The caveat being inferior image quality and presets vs. One X. But the Series S CPU stomps all over the pimped Jaguar in the One X.
@@InnerFury1886 Whoops, your right on the 1/3rd part. Your tech specs are a bit off, but it was a case of me typing without correcting myself. 1440 isn't 2/3rd of 4k either. will edit my post. (I'm pretty sure I'm probably going to need to edit a couple of them. lol) Edit: Just read the end of your post. I pop in when it's slow at work. DF does a fine job but at the end of the day it's up to the devs to decide what they are going to do. That's the point I am making. The Series S is not a 4k box, nor is it designed to be. It is effectively, designed for 1080 displays. It has the same CPU only running at 95% of the SX, It has 40% of the video CU's running at 85% the SX, 62% of the same memory of the SX (8GB/2GB vs 10GB/6GB), with the same speed storage and I/O performance. Are sacrifices going to need to be made? sure, some settings will need to be tweaked but many dev's can't even do that.
@@JamieRobert_ because it even a struggle for mid tier graphics cards to pull 1440p 120 at high setting. So they tone it down to 1080p for the best high frame rate experience.
@@JamieRobert_ for 120hz it makes sense/more understandable for it to be 1080p. 120 is a big undertaking. Unlike some games like Dying Light 2 at launch or Even GOTG where it dives all the way to 1080p for 60fps...
I truly love the 4x zoom so I can clearly see the difference on my mobile. You guys should do more of that! Ignore the nonsensical haters.
It's also for anyone with a 1080p display.
Who hates on it?
You should see it on an LG C1 at 4k. Series S should have gone to Specsavers.
@@BrecklynFast A lot of people clown on digital foundry for zooming in because "it's pointless, and no one plays while zooming in" and shit like that. But in reality it's incredibly helpful for people watching the video on their phones or in TH-cam in general. TH-cam's file compression obliterates any sort of sharp detail and particles on videos, so zooming in helps bring those details back into the video and see clearly what they're talking about
Nonsensical? Lol you can’t even notice these differences sitting at a normal distance rom a tv either. It’s completely useless
The best thing about this game is not the graphics. It's full crossplay support. I was playing it on PS5 with my friend who plays it on his PC thru Epic store. Virtually zero issue.
@@ea8455 sony has been doing cross play since 2002ish on ps2 with pc and with xbox in 2008 in SOME games, mostly mmos, i played ffxi on ps2 with pc players in 2004, and with xbox360 players in 2008 while cross play ended in 2012ish or 13 ish with xbox(idk why tho) it still ran untill ps2 support ended in 2018.
also Black desert online has cross play with xbox and ps...........these do happen in most games mostly 3rd party games. the big problem is when you have to let either team into your network(i think it works on mmos becuase you DO NOT need any service xbox live or ps plus to use the mmos and they use there own servers)
Series S running at 1440/60 is not being "left behind". It's exactly what we want from that console!
@@JamieRobert_ it is on pc
i love how the switch never gets mentioned, the system too many 3rd party devs ignore cuz the hardware is too weak to even run some games from 2013...
@@hhhfdsfs what is that supposed to mean.
Thats the target of the console!!
@@Youraveragegamer_97 What is there to mention? The Switch can't even run Doom 2016 smoothly at lower than lowest settings at 360p/30fps.
I like that they give 120fps as an option 👍🙌
Me too, but I prefer the 4K@60 for the campaign. Did the same thing for Halo infinite.
@@mash2481 I do the same with Borderlands 3, no point in playing at 120fps for a story shooter imo
@@cmdr101z8 agreed
Higher frame rates provide a better gameplay experience.
@@cmdr101z8 no point, lol
I think you forgot to mention that the UI lowers in resolution in 120fps mode which makes the game as a whole VERY blurry.
Not on a 1080p screen, lol.
I never use the 120fps option for BL3 or Wonderlands, it comes at the expense of blurry text - the text (UI, descriptions, labels etc.) in these games is just too important to sacrifice.
My BL 3 and Doom Eternal 120fps mode looks completely fine on my 24 inch 1080p Monitor. But if u play on a 69 inch TV then, yes, it won't look pretty. lol
I remember a year ago when you guys looked at DMC 5 on next gen looking at the very first instance of 120fps on console. The frame time graph was basically a rollercoster and you guys were still pretty impressed even with all the setbacks made. now a year later and we're running games like this at a much smoother 120 fps and its amazing how well devs are starting to optimize for 120fps on console. I can only imagine the future where we can see a native 1440p at 120fps, i have no doubt a couple more years and we could see it happen in a game as large as this one.
Not a chance, like all performance modes on current gen versions of games, it will always be the AKA "compromised visuals" mode.
@@andrewsqual There will always be different graphical modes, im just saying in a few more years we could see less setbacks in performance modes. Especially when we see next gen exclusive games become the new norm allowing devs to squeeze so much more power out of this hardware.
Doom Eternal runs a locked 120hz at resolutions *above* 1440p on PS5 and Series X. It's no slouch with the visuals either, I would argue it is visually more complex than any Borderlands game. And yes, Doom Eternal is an outlier. But my point is that that level of performance is *already* available, and that it's therefore possible for other games to achieve the same results.
No. Resolution targets will decrease across the board as other graphical settings and new feature sets gets pushed further.
FSR 2.0 should definitely help when implemented.
i think all modes on current gen should have an additional "unlock frame rate" toggle to future proof.
Pay them $10 extra for the option :P
That would allow pro or enhanced machines to see an instant impact with no involvement from the devs
@@earnistse4899 exactly. Even if a game has a mode locked to 30 now, just have a separate “unlock to 60” toggle. And for games/modes at 60, that becomes an “unlock to 120” mode. Or instead just one extra toggle, that just unlocks whatever mode up to 120
@@jesseshaver2262 yup , but for them common sense isn’t so common
Love the Assault on Dragon Keep soundtrack. Wonderlands has some great songs, but that original dlc soundtrack is amazing and it's great to hear it here.
I agree that townsong is so beautiful of that dlc
Brings a tear to my eye, genuinely
@Garrus Vakarian yeah, I didn't notice as much speeding through the campaign other than a couple atmospheric tracks I think are good, but listening to the soundtrack is a bit of a letdown after the Assault on Dragon Keep. I guess the areas are bigger so they decided to make it more minimalistic?
@Garrus Vakarian true, OST of that game is not on the level of any other BL game...
Why didn't they just re-use this track. I'm probably not the only one who ended up just imagining it anyway. Why leave me to my audio hallucinations?
Love you guys and all you do!
Could you please consider direct comparisons between the standard versions and the more expensive “next gen” versions? Maybe even a long form vid including several titles now that we’re seeing more and more titles requiring and extra 10 bucks and often for just one version of the game? Comparisons including load times, resolution, performance, etc when both versions are installed on our fancy new SSDs? Tiny Tina is one of a growing number of games asking us to pay more while getting less details (or more vague ones) as to what we’re getting for our money. With others giving us the “optimized” version for free, it’s frustrating not knowing if the only thing we’re actually paying for is that precious “optimized for” version of the game tile/icon.
Thanks. And thank you so much for continuing to speak my language when it comes to gaming.
the game experiences severe dips on PC as well - just by moving the crosshair from North to East in Brighthoof (Wonderlands' Sanctuary) can lead to ~20 FPS drop - from 50 to 30...
I still don't get why they haven't added the dynamic res mode to the PC version.
Gtx1060 get over 80 in some areas , and below 60 even on sub 1080p in some spots. Some variable settings would really be helpful here .. And they only did it in the console versions:(
Having a LG C1 with VRR for my series X has been a god send.
You poor soul
@@Hazmatt36000 I believe the were being sarcastic lol. I have the C1 too. It is an absolutely brilliant combination for games and movies.
@@DEVILTAZ35 never know online but you could be right. Thanks. I deleted my response.
_any_ Borderlands game that doesn't involve the Calypso twins or Ava is an improvement...
Ava is the reason i dont replay bl3
BL3 is better than this trash DLC game.
@@00ivatsa the entirety of the cutscenes and unbearable "wait for characters to stop talking" scenes make BL3 virtually unplayable after a first playthrough. They're bad enough the first time.
My favorite person to hear in DF ,he is always fair and to the point.
No offence to the others.
120fps is my definite go to, higher frame rates means a better gameplay experience
Tried it but graphics looked very meh
PS fan here, but 120 Hz + VRR sounds great, Sony needs to hurry up
Series S is looking somewhat blurry
It's weird they just said in the coming month. I still think there is a hardware issue and it is going to be limited compared to Xbox. The Sony TV VRR is not very good compared to LG for a start.
What a looser🤣🤣🤣, real gamers play everything and pick the best version regardless of console. Another W for xbox tho
I love this game for what it is. Taking the framework of B3 and putting a fun spin on it. I would have loved if they dropped the guns and fully committed to the fantasy.. but I understand what they were going for and you can feel the budget, time, and design constraints. They did a great job with what they had
Borderlands isn’t borderlands without guns
Why would you want to play borderlands without guns? Prefer hiding in lockers?
@@Rebelscum264 different weapons. Granted I'd prefer guns and special melee weapons. There are a lot of cool things that can be done but they seem heavily restricted. They don't even get paid by randy so 🤷♂️
I mean how cool would it be if we had crazy cross bows, old school steam punk weapons, now and arrows. Idk, would be neat
Trash
Still feeling that lack of 1440p support on PS5. Would be nice to be able to play at 1440p instead of 4K on resolution mode and get an even smoother 60fps lock. I tried the 1080p mode out but apparently I've been spoiled by 1440p because I couldn't handle it and switched back to 4K right quick.
This game arent supporting 1440 p on ps5 or either xbox x series.
@@alphaomega887654321 "This game *isn't* supporting 1440p on either PS5 or Series X."... There, fixed it for ya.
It should be running at 1800p locked 60
@@nonyabusiness6084 pardon my concentration is lacking
@@nitehawk-cg6jb I think they said b/w 1800p and 4K adaptive Res.
Series S hitting its target. I sure wish this channel would give a $299 machine props for these kind of efforts. It’s meeting what was promised to its audience and consumers here.
We love you Tom!!!!
You're weird and speak for yourself.
I wonder what TTW could've been like if they went even further into the medieval setting and instead of guns used procedural bows, swords, crossbows, things like that
That's what I was hoping for! Even the manufacturers of the weapons are almost completely copied across.
Missed opportunity.
@@Notsram77 but that's because it's not an alternate universe or anything, it's an in universe ''B&B'' game. it's pretty much a joke on when real life D&D games just half-copy names of real life things for their games. it's not that it was lazy or anything, it was intentional
This was an eye opener in terms of graphical power for the 3 consoles. I had a series S up until November of last year until I decided to trade it in for a series X. I thought I was absolutely fine gaming on it but this really highlighted the differences. And I was fine but I just loved my series S so much and wanted a console with a disc drive that I said why not... Anyways, great review.
PS5 user here i hope you're enjoying your Series X 😊
Wow this game looks beautiful, and with the narrower scope than bigger bordlerlands games, I might check it out
My friends and I have enjoyed it a lot so far, much more so than BL3. That said, the servers are shit right now if you're trying to play co-op. We started yesterday and have been seeing comments that issues have been going since launch so yeah lol
@@chizrocker88 yeah man normally I’m 90fps at 4k mostly maxed setting and some missions will lag real bad and drop me to 30
Looks like borderlands 🤡
wait till they fix it. not worth $70
@@colonian83 This
wouldn't it be nice if they could include split-screen for PC players? or is that too much to ask randy?
they easily could too but nah... That's also pretty much why black ops 3 is high on my list of fun PC games not the game itself it has built in splitscreen on PC... like tf?
Randy isn't running the show at Gearbox software anymore after the sold out to Embracer. Steve Jones is who you should be asking.
Dude wouldn't swallow his ego to keep claptrap '09 voice actor working with them. He sure as fuck isn't doing anything thoughtful like that.
@@XZ-III and even that game doesn't support ultrawide for split screen even though it does support it for one player...
louder for Randy in the back
On the PC it's a stutter nightmare in the open world with RTX 3080 i9 10850K 32gb 3200mhz RAM- tried everything including full reinstall of windows and swapping out hardware. Devs need to optimise better!
Is it that bad?
I haven't baught it yet...
Could try setting in game to 120fps then use nvidia Adaptive half fps sync, works with some games.
Some people reported a lot of stutter on Borderlands 3, never had much of an issue myself. Try to limit the frame rate in Nvidia control panel "starting" low to say 60 fps if you are on 1440P. A drop from say 130fps to 90 fps in a demanding scene can be jarring in many games, its better to restrict the highs even if you have a variable refresh display.
It's just not optimized given how it looks.
Try with in-game V-Sync or Nvidia Control Panel V-Sync or FPS limiter and see if that helps.
Works fine for me with a 3080, i7 8700k, and 32GB of 3200MHz RAM installed on a 970 Evo Plus. What do you have it installed on?
I think if the developers wanted to enable 120fps on Xbox series s, they'd have to drop the resolution to 720p, judging from how much the resolution drastically decreases from 4k to 1080p on Xbox series X/ps5 in 120fps mode, which is not worth it.
Waiting for the Lego Star Wars one 🤩
Awesome video as always Thomas
Lego Star Wars The Skywalker Saga review tomorrow?
Already out
@@TSL73 I was talking about their review of the game's performance
I will take the STABLE 60 - EVERY TIME.
All I know is that on Series X in Resolution Mode, playing as a Spellshot, the frame rate was absolute ass in certain areas. One example off the top of my head was Mount Craw. In an intense firefight against elemental goblins with wyverns flying overhead, flinging spells and firing elemental weapons, the frame rate would regularly drop sub-30. It was painful enough that I swapped over to Performance mode, but on a 4K TV that mode looks like someone smeared everything with a thin layer of Vaseline.
I digress. Between the performance issues, the short length of the campaign, and the lackluster end game that feels dated (yet another horde mode design, yaaaaaaaaaay /s), this really should have been a budget title, not a $60-$70 one.
I had an issue with Guardians of the Galaxy on Series X where the frame rate dropped really bad. Easily below 30fps. However it turned out to be an issue with the game being in Quick Resume. As when I quit the game and restarted it the game ran solid in the exact same sections of the game.
You should never buy these games on launch.
I bought BL3 like 3 or 4 months ago and got it for about 40 to 60 dollars with every single DLC included and a bunch of fixes and upgrades over 2 years.
Absolutely worth every penny and I would have not have enjoyed it as much if I payed more for less of an experience at launch.
I'll probably be playing this in a year or so and will be rewarded massively for waiting.
Games like these depend on having a robust endgame and they never have that quite worked out at launch.
It's just DLC disguised as a full price product so they could rip people off.
@@nonyabusiness6084 Yeah i had Cricket 22 corrupt my save game and it turned out it was due to Quick resume lol. I was in match 6 of a career innings too. Lost the lot.
Thanks guys for this !
I’m loving this game! I’m a huge fan of the series, but the emphasis on D&D, with spells replacing grenades really mixes things up. Can’t wait to see what they come up with for DLC!
@Lightningnation13 No shit...
@Lightningnation13 That's how I understood his post as well.
Finally, I'm gonna watch this while eating
the top down view make me think they could make a borderlands twin stick shooter.
Ignore all the hate. The zoom is really helpful.
That music is soo nostalgic, this theme plays in flame rock refuge, Borderlands 2 was the best Borderlands game
Great to hear Tom's voice again
I dont need it
I dont need it
I NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEED IT
Wait a year. You'll get it for less with more content, and a bunch of a fixes the community asked the dev for.
Trust me. You'll enjoy it so much more.
So basically nothing to worry about buying rn if you own Series S console. No next gen enhancements for Series S consoles BUT they DO give you the next gen price tag of $70 smackers. Oh JoY!
No hate, but I almost beat the game waiting for this 🤣
And it's not even for pc :(
Is there new game plus?
@@infinitysynthesis not from my knowledge, the most they have end game is Chaos mode which is similar to Borderlands Mayhem mode. I haven't beat it tho so I'm not sure how that all works yet.
@@delonejuanderer What r u talking about? I'm looking at it at the Epic store like... right now...
@@XZ-III I'm talking about the video itself? Obviously it's on pc my guy literally what I "almost beat the game" on lol
Awesome, thanks for the overview
The antialiasing solution (or lack of one) is pretty brutal even on the main machines. That shimmer at 4k even aint great
3 had this problem too, didn't it? Would have been nice to have that resolved.
Get out more
I love crisp images, i'm playing it on pc with no anti aliasing on at all for that native look with no TAA messing up the image. Not sure why people like blurred over vaseline games.
I remember FXAA completely broke the DoF in borderlands 2 and idk if that even got concluded or if anyone cared enough to fix it. The cell shading would just get confused or something
@@theoldpcgamer77 to each their own! I generally prefer image stability so the option would have been nice
I think I'm the only one in the universe that doesn't see much difference between 60 and 120/144. I mean I see it but I don't think that it makes all that much difference, 30 to 60 on the other hand is a MASSIVE difference
Well that's how it works 30->60 is huge but 60->120 is noticeable but much less
Hope you do one for the new lego Star Wars game. The only frame rate video tests I can find are for the switch
There are some. I just seen some yesterday
This game wasn’t even on my radar. I think it is now.
DF should start including quick resume load times. It’s be interesting to see how much time that saves over loading the game from a new boot to vs quick resume.
I bought this game on series s and am enjoying it! The goofy nature and the nostalgia that I had with borderlands 3!(haven't played the first and the second)I don't find the humour really funny but that did not distract me from enjoying the game!
Edit: correction, now on series x☺️!
Perfect example of why I’ve stopped purchasing games from gearbox
How about a Legos Star Wars tech analysis.
Good to see XBSX being "more" consistent with release performance in a number of titles over the last 6 months.
Cool, its the diamond unicorn as described by handsome jack.
It's already in BL2 DLC ;)
On the PC I definitely think there is a difference in performance between titles!
I got really annoying lag spikes that lasted for like 5 seconds on the PS5 using split screen. It’s super annoying but other than that the game is fun
Were you in performance mode ?
The devs don’t consider using most of the rdna 2 features, and then they complain about the gpu although that tiny Tina is running ok on series s it could run better if developers cared
Nah they just don’t wanna waste their time on an obsolete console lmao
that thumbnail is terrifying
Xbox wins again. And then add VRR . Ultimate destruction like always
Once again Xbox needs that crutch to keep up with PS5.
@eel3161 no suprises? Tey you fools have been wondering why PS5 has been outperforming series x...
I can’t help but feel this doesn’t really look like a current gen game. It doesn’t look much different from last gen
It's 60 fps with much better image quality and also support 120 fps. Last gen is 30 fps with inferior image quality. That's more than enough next gen.
@@DrJones20 I played 4K 60fps on pc
@@evilmarc Yes and it's 4K 60 here as well
@@DrJones20 which was my point, it doesn’t look much different for me
@@evilmarc Compared to last gen consoles. If you have a PC what are you doing here? Do you expect 499$ hardware to magically outperform PC? Jesus...
Game is really nice, but I find myself overwhelmed by the amount of loot and never exactly sure what is an upgrade and what isn't.
Build character around certain stat's from the items rhat favour your skill selections, green text better red text bad, simple
You are used to simple games and now you can’t play games that require thinking.
That’s why I don’t play carebear games.
@@reignjuste This is Borderlands.
Are you seriously trying to dunk on someone over video games? Weird flex.
@@gellister especially trying to consider this game an "advanced" game. Some people got nothing better to feel good about
I feel like if they charge a price difference then the visual differences should be night and day.
In the post game Chaos Chamber, the performance UTTERLY TANKS, even in the performance mode you see dips to sub-30. I have no idea why, it's a little arena without all that much going on but its performance just collapses. This being on XSX.
Good video, thanks.
Ya know.. I'm still curious why in so many reviews of this game I haven't seen anyone compare or discuss how this is so much like the old Bunkers and badasses dlc from BL2. That was a really well done and touching story, and uses almost everything this one uses except this has the overworld map and the newer mechanics of bl3...
Maybe they didn't play it, I mean, TT's AoDK came out almost 10 years ago.
@@vaguedreams 2K did release the DLC as a standalone campaign a few months ago, so that should of been incentive for reviewers to check on the game that inspired the tiny tina game in the first place.
@@ramiking745 It's still a ten year old add on. I get what you're saying, but with so much new stuff out I can see people not bothering.
It also doesn't hit the feels and looses a lot by not being tied to borderlands 2.
Does it really matter?
Runs at 1440p 120fps on my ps5 now
The Series S was heavily advertised as a next-gen 1440p 30fps machine with RT, and already so early in the generation it's already struggling. That really worries me, I can't imagine what it's going to look like 3-4 years from now
Yeah it's very worrying I brought a series s before I got my PS5, because stock was an issue. But then a week later I got my PS5 and gave back my series S 😂, while I like the S it's obviously running out of steam quite early.
No worries. Just start saving, sell or trade in the Xbox S and upgrade later down the line. It's what I plan on doing maybe next year.
Firstly this is running at a dynamic 1440p at 60fps. Secondly Microsoft always said it would support UP TO 1440p, not a locked 1440p. If you locked it to 30fps, it could absolutely hold 1440p in this game but 60 is preferable.
What are you talking about? It runs this game at 1080p-1440p & 60fps. Go try to get that performance on a PC for only $299. It is running this game exactly as it should. FSR will be implemented by the time actual next gen games start coming out.
Oh, and no it was not advertised as a 1440p, 30fps machine with RT. It was advertised as a 1080p-1440p machine only. Nothing was said about frame rate and it is running games at 1080p-1440p, just as advertised.
Series S is the budget upgrade path for previous owners of vanillla Xbox One/S, and a budget mainstream Game Pass vessel.
To hit the $299 MSRP, it was stripped of important GPU and memory specs -- raw compute units, bandwidth, VRAM quantity, etc.
Thankfully they had no real choice but to leave the CPU largely intact - and in that area, it destroys the last-gen Jaguar cores, plus the SSD with hardware-accelerated decompression.
The superior CPU opens opportunities for 60fps (and rarely 120fps) modes, the SSD+IO provides quick data transfer, but the weaker GPU/memory architecture certainly handicaps the best-case resolutions and visual presets on Series S.
It's pretty decent kit for $299, though. Arguably better than any PC you could assemble for the price, and better than what $299 could buy an existing low end PC owners in terms of upgrades.
Haven’t read the comment section yet but I’m willing to bet there’ll be lots of insecure Series S buyers 😭 and complaining already
It’s a weird one. UE4 has excellent TAAU yet both BL3 and TT are made with UE4 and exhibit plenty of aliasing. Strange. And annoying.
It literally comes with Temporal upsampling out of the box, no idea what happened there
It's up to the developer to tweak the TAAU to their liking, they must have decided to change the default values and aimed for a clearer but more aliased image.
In engine there's TAA x 4, 8, 16, 32 and post color sampling with kernal softening, but I'd imagine consoles use 4x with sharpening filter which makes it look more aliased especially stretched on big TVs
@@TRONiX404 it’s not a console thing. Most UE4 titles have very effective TAA coverage on consoles. My guess is that Gearbox’s custom UE4 engine just isn’t very efficient - so they need to claw back some performance with lower quality TAA.
Finally took you quite some time to make this video
Intentionally not buying on any platform due to the EGS exclusivity.
Nobody cares
@@xMahzii I do.
Surely that will make them learn
@@LuisSR01 Take a look at the low sales numbers on PC before making yourself look like a fool on the internet.
$70 for the Current Gen version is a pass for me (and should be for Series S owners). I'll wait until it drops in price or comes out on Gamepass/PSNow.
Wym should be for the series S? It’s running 1440p 60fps. That’s perfectly fine
$70 and a 120hz VRR TV to play this rubbish
Holy hell that is a lot. I only paid £31 for my pc version. I guess you can sell the game after you have finished it to make a decent chunk of the money back.
Gamefly ftw
@@theoldpcgamer77 the cheapest version you can find costs 45€ for pc and 59€ for ps5 and cbox x.
I never use the 120fps option for BL3 or Wonderlands, it comes at the expense of blurry text - the text (UI, descriptions, labels etc.) in these games is just too important to sacrifice. If it was 1440p instead of 1080p then maybe... but from 4K to 1080p the text quality just ruins it.
Is there a reason they do that or is it an oversight?
It's not a problem for me since I have a 4K HDR 120 Hz TV And I have used 120 Hz mode in borderlands 3 and Tiny Tina's wonderlands Which they are upscaled at 4K HDR on PS5 they do not look blurry at all 😉👍
It doesn't look good in performance mode on series x. Playing in resolution is great however.
Fluctuating from 120 to 80fps will still feel better on a 120hz+ screen than a locked 60.
So is Next Gen version or all versión working to 60 fps on a ps5 ?? I know why not exist 30fps Mode on Gearbox Games....
I would be really interested to see the last Gen performance as well
Srsly 299$ console is best value right now if u dont play on 4k screen. Series S has great price and offer pretty solid experience.
But it still can't beat the series x on price to performance
@@cavejohnson5796 I dont know. If you dont have 4k tv then u dont need series X. Same games, good performance for half price.
@@lajtygrowe2303 it's not half price
@@cavejohnson5796 Gl if u want buy XSX for basic price ;p
Consoles running better than pc atm. Direct x 12 is a mess and constant crashing and frame dips in town
Speak for yourself. I get 110fps average at 1440p with no dips or stutter and ive had zero crashes in 55 hours.
The games looks like a game from 5 years or so ago , simple mechanics , simple ai , average / below average for 2022 game the performance on pc is shit for the visual return simple mechanics
Does split screen cut the resolution in half or reduce graphics ? If I play on fidelity on ps5 split screen will the resolution still be 4k?
I bought this for ps5 and am somewhat disappointed with the game on a technical level. For charging $70, there's NO 3D AUDIO and NO Dual Sense support and the graphics are not really improved over Borderlands 3. It's also a spin off reusing lots of assets from B3. Should've at least had 3d audio and haptics though. I'm kinda pissed about that.
Still waiting for split screen and for PhysX to return on PC
I just hope the Series S down the line can be understood better by developers the more they get used to the hardware.
Dude there is only so much you can do with what is essentially a slightly weaker PS4 Pro with an SSD.
@@ElShmiablo Exactly. Especially when Techland finally added 60FPS to Dying Light 2 a month later.
@@ElShmiablo There is extra stuff like VRS that can be used to improve performance. but is not being used my most games atm.
@@ElShmiablo bro what , the ps4 pro only got like 0.2 higher in teraflop count and thts it, series S is better in every other way, but I don’t have a lot of knowledge on series S, this is just what I know , plus series S is more advanced with the newer gpu architecture and better cpu
@@ElShmiablo 🤦♂️
Didn't even clock it supported 120fps no wonder my ps5 was screaming at me with coil whine on performance mode
I cant wait to play this game, when one day it comes down to $25 bucks! or all dlc included in a game of the year edition.
I wish they didn't just play the first two areas, wanted to see everything else, also do frame rate tests when your actually using some crazy higher level stuff.
That's on Gearbox though. Only allowed to show the first two levels for review. That's probably when they made this.
@@AIIEYESONME Good point.
Big surprise, Series S gets shafted again. I wish I could get a Series X and sell my S, I’m really not happy with all the compromises I’m seeing in every single game.
If it was just a lower resolution as it was advertised I’d be perfectly happy, but there’s always very noticeable graphics and performance problems on almost every release.
Not sure what you were expecting from a $299 budget console. It is running this game at 1080p 60fps, which is absolutely fine for a $299 budget console. You can now pick up a Series X much easier. I get emails from Microsoft all the time. Check the Microsoft Store online.
If you didn't watch these stupid videos you wouldn't even know lol
@@nonyabusiness6084 I think the big issue is that it should perform better and devs just don't seem to make adjustments for it.
1080 at a locked 60 should be the minimum goal but they can't be arsed to do that. It supports VRR and 120fps. A performance mode for it should be included. They manage to provide setting on PC, I am unsure why they can't do that for todays consoles.
It's kind of the same argument for having split screen on PC. Is it really that difficult to implement when they manage it on consoles?
Lol why did you buy it in the first place if you care about performance. That's funny.
You kept mentioning bl3.....it would of been nice to take 10 seconds to remind us what bl3 res/fps is/was with it's current updates. Just something fun and extra that would of been relevant. Good job tom.
120hz mode with no VRR, LMAO ,what's the point, fixed refresh Tv's are rubbish for gaming end of story, welcome to 7 years ago when G-Sync changed everything and made gaming better
You’re acting like it’s not coming to PS5 in a few months
@@Ogravit Assuming you have a TV that supports it and a TV with 120hz, well done welcome to 7 years ago
ps5 VRR was pushed a while back. Add it in your description.
I just hated that when I was playing the game would stutter and freeze for a second or two multiple times during gameplay! unplayable for me, and I'm not the only person who's encountered this issue
Bespoke in under 60 seconds 😎
I'm honestly glad this exists, but I was pretty disappointed to see some of the same gun models from BL3 show up with new 'attachments'.
I like what this is, but I wish it were even more distinct from Borderlands.
Gearbox is known for crap and greed
@@His0ka That's almost purely Randy "Hands-on" Pitchford. The company itself is just vanilla flavored garbage, inoffensive - but you can't think about what you're consuming.
@@SmogginMog hes not running the show anymore
i honestly don’t understand what you were expecting.
Hope this comes to psvr2 i loved borderlands 2 on psvr
Some unrealistic expectations for Series S. The SS is the budget upgrade path for previous owners of vanillla Xbox One/S, and a budget mainstream Game Pass vessel.
To hit the $299 MSRP, it was stripped of important GPU and memory specs -- raw compute units, bandwidth, VRAM quantity, etc. all take a dive.
Thankfully they had no real choice but to leave the CPU largely intact to allow for baseline new gen game handling, and in that area, the Series S destroys the last-gen Jaguar cores, plus the SSD with hardware-accelerated decompression is a pronounced advantage
.
The superior CPU opens opportunities for 60fps (and rarely 120fps) modes, the SSD+IO provides quick data transfer, but the weaker GPU/memory architecture certainly handicaps the best-case resolutions and visual presets possible on Series S.
It's pretty decent kit for $299, though. Arguably better than any PC you could assemble for the price, and better than what $299 could buy an existing low end PC owner - in terms of 300 bucks of upgrades.
It is the budget option, and seems to have sold well in that role. But we must be realistic about best case technical expectations for the Series S.
Anyone buying a Series S for $299 and complaining about the performance of any game should be slapped in the mouth and have their Series S taken away from them.
@@nonyabusiness6084 i have series s and it is crap for new games , awesome for apps tho and emulations.
it's a bit more than 1/3rd of a Series X, a 4k machine, and designed to run games at 1440p (or 44% 4k) for tv's that in general are 1080p. 1080/60 and a 120 performance option should not be considered asking too much.
Edit: Incorrectly wrote the SS is 2/3rds of a SX when it would be closer to 1/3rd. Also wrote 1440p is 2/3rds of 4k when it's more like 44%
@@vaguedreams We've definitely seen more complex AAA with a 60fps option on Series S compared to its predecessor One S.
Hell, more than One X actually.
(One X being spec'd for UHD resolutions at 30fps).
The caveat being inferior image quality and presets vs. One X.
But the Series S CPU stomps all over the pimped Jaguar in the One X.
@@InnerFury1886 Whoops, your right on the 1/3rd part. Your tech specs are a bit off, but it was a case of me typing without correcting myself. 1440 isn't 2/3rd of 4k either. will edit my post. (I'm pretty sure I'm probably going to need to edit a couple of them. lol)
Edit: Just read the end of your post.
I pop in when it's slow at work. DF does a fine job but at the end of the day it's up to the devs to decide what they are going to do. That's the point I am making.
The Series S is not a 4k box, nor is it designed to be. It is effectively, designed for 1080 displays. It has the same CPU only running at 95% of the SX, It has 40% of the video CU's running at 85% the SX, 62% of the same memory of the SX (8GB/2GB vs 10GB/6GB), with the same speed storage and I/O performance.
Are sacrifices going to need to be made? sure, some settings will need to be tweaked but many dev's can't even do that.
Immediately noticed the fps dips on Xbox Series S, also no motion blur settings either… how is this a justified $100 game purchase in 2022.
I think the game market is about to tank in Canada, even for a digital game purchase, after tax, your paying $101.00
You'd think that a next gen console....would be able to run a game
I guess we were foolish enough to believe that.
What has to have gone wrong in your life that you describe an occasional drop from 60fps to 56fps as "jarring"?
He described dropping to 59 as that which is absurd
I love Boarderlands, and I love Fantasy rpg's, so this is going to be worth taking some holiday off work for!!!!!!!!!
I can definitely feel when the game drops to 59-58 on ps5. VRR to the rescue on my Xbox series x.
You bought the same game twice at full price? LMAO
@@pennywisethedancingclown7139 You know there's something called returns and refunds right?
So how is ps5 120 fps now since vrr is added?
Massive Win for Series X + VRR !
12:29
@@jcdenton41100 losing all year? Lool, I hope you enjoy playstation "gamepass" ohh I mean Playstation Now 1.5 🤣
@@GeniusEliteZ yep lost with gta 5, elden ring, cyberpunk 2077, and has zero games 🤣🤣🤣🤣
"Massive"
🤦🏻♂️
PS5 VRR Otw anyways lol
don't worry VRR is coming to PS5 too 🤪😉
bro you gotta work on that character customization
its about time ps5 gets more 120fps games
At 1080p which is disappointing why can’t they have done 1440p 120
@@JamieRobert_ the series x is 1080p..playstation never marketed their console as OMG SO POWERFUL like xbox did..what is goin on?
@@JamieRobert_ because it even a struggle for mid tier graphics cards to pull 1440p 120 at high setting. So they tone it down to 1080p for the best high frame rate experience.
@@JamieRobert_ for 120hz it makes sense/more understandable for it to be 1080p. 120 is a big undertaking.
Unlike some games like Dying Light 2 at launch or Even GOTG where it dives all the way to 1080p for 60fps...
@@mikeuk666 damage control