Rape through Sexual Assault (Article 266-A, paragraph 2 of the RPC, as amended by RA 8353)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024

ความคิดเห็น • 15

  • @ingkitquingco5912
    @ingkitquingco5912 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    The anti rape law of 1997, reclassified rape from a crime against honor, a private offense to that of a crime against persons. Will the subsequent marriage of the offender and the offended party extinguish the criminal action of the penalty imposed? explain..

  • @gilbertoperalta4291
    @gilbertoperalta4291 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Thank u so much very elaborative

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Salamat 😊

  • @vanessakuan5870
    @vanessakuan5870 ปีที่แล้ว

    Thank you po!

  • @charmeinrivera
    @charmeinrivera ปีที่แล้ว

    Good pm.. atty.ano ang prision mayor? Anong hatol sa sexual assault?

  • @charmeinrivera
    @charmeinrivera ปีที่แล้ว

    Good afternoon po.atty. ano po ang prision mayor? At ano po ang magiging hatol sa sexual assault? At nong ma inquest ang suspect at hndi nag nag counter affidavit ang suspect ano po ang ibig sabihin?? Thank you po ng marami.🙂

  • @kurtafan335
    @kurtafan335 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    Accused jumped upon a woman and threw her to the ground. Although the accused raised her skirts, the accused did not make any effort to remove the woman's underwear. Instead, he removed his own underwear and placed himself on top of the woman and started performing sexual movements. The crime committed is?
    A. Acts of lasciviousness
    B. Attempted rape
    C. Rape
    D. Sexual assault

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      What's your answer? 😊

    • @kurtafan335
      @kurtafan335 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      @@FiscalEJ very tricky question sir... Majority answered D while my rcrim friends most of them says its B. Very difficult.

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      @@kurtafan335 The answer should be letter A (acts of lasciviousness).
      It is not attempted rape because there was no intent to have sexual intercourse with the woman. Otherwise, he would have removed her underwear and he would have attempted to insert his penis on her vagina.
      With more reason it is not rape because in rape, for it to be consummated, there must be proof that the penis touched (with intent to penetrate) the labia of the pudendum of the woman.
      It is also not sexual assault because there was no insertion of the finger or any instrument on the vagina of the woman.
      The crime committed is acts of lasciviousness because the acts of the accused in raising her skirt and making sexual movements are clearly indicative of lewd designs.

    • @kurtafan335
      @kurtafan335 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FiscalEJ thank you so much sir appreciate you give time to explain godbless you po

  • @lexparejuan4035
    @lexparejuan4035 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    How about sir..how if condom was removes without permision with the sex partner

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  ปีที่แล้ว

      Kahit na walang pahintulot ang pagtanggal ng condom, hindi po rape yan. Magiging rape lang kapag pilig na pinapasok ang ari ng walang condom na walang pahintulot sa babae.

    • @rojohnsol6180
      @rojohnsol6180 ปีที่แล้ว

      Stealthing ang kaso jan. .it is a non consensual removing of condom during sex. . .pero walang batas na nag eexist nyan dito sa pilipinas. .hence der s no crime committed. . .NULLUM CRIMEN, NULLA POENA SINE LEGE

  • @rojohnsol6180
    @rojohnsol6180 ปีที่แล้ว

    In a jurisprudence established by the SC, it was held dat a mere bombardment of the drawbridge even if the troop did not succeed in entering the castle constitute rape. . . .hehe