Adultery and Concubinage (Articles 333 and 334 of the Revised Penal Code)

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 26 ส.ค. 2024
  • Comparison of the provisions on Adultery and Concubinage 0:44
    Comparison of the elements of Adultery and Concubinage 2:21
    Discussion of the elements of Adultery/ FIRST ELEMENT: “That the woman is married” 4:59
    Examples of the first element 8:45
    SECOND ELEMENT: “That she has sexual intercourse with a man not her husband” 10:40
    Question: Must the offenders be caught in the act of having sexual intercourse for purposes of proving the crime of adultery? 12:52
    Examples of the second element 14:45
    Circumstantial evidence is enough to prove the crime of adultery (and also of concubinage) 16:52
    THIRD ELEMENT: “That as regards the man with whom she has sexual intercourse, he must know her to be married” 18:37
    Example of the third element 21:57
    Discussion of the elements of Concubinage/FIRST ELEMENT: “That the man must be married” 23:06
    Examples of the first element 26:45
    SECOND ELEMENT: “That he committed any of the following acts: (a) keeping a mistress in the conjugal dwelling; (b) having sexual intercourse under scandalous circumstances with a woman who is not his wife; (c) cohabiting with her in any other place” 29:37
    FIRST WAY OF COMMITTING CONCUBINAGE: “keeping a mistress in the conjugal dwelling” 30:11
    SECOND WAY OF COMMITTING CONCUBINAGE: “having sexual intercourse under scandalous circumstances” 32:54
    THIRD WAY OF COMMITTING CONCUBINAGE: “cohabiting with her in any other place” 38:43
    Summary of distinctions between Adultery and Concubinage 41:45
    Defenses in Adultery and Concubinage: (1) Pardon by the offended spouse 46:00
    (2) Consent by the offended spouse 50:43
    WHAT CAN MITIGATE THE LIABILITY OF THE OFFENDER IN ADULTERY AND CONCUBINAGE? 52:02
    WHO CAN FILE A COMPLAINT FOR ADULTERY OR CONCUBINAGE? 54:41

ความคิดเห็น • 34

  • @jinorayla268
    @jinorayla268 2 ปีที่แล้ว +2

    Good day fiscal...paano po kung sa ibang bansa nangyri yun relasyon NILA..ndi po dto pinas..tpos may NABUO po...pero ndi po cla nagsasama dto sa pinas...pwde bang madismis ang kaso...

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Kung dun nangyari o naganap sa ibang bansa ang adultery o concubinage, hindi po pwedeng sampahan ng kaso o kung masampahan man, madi-dismiss po.
      Sinusunod po kasi natin ang tinatawag na TERRITORIALITY principle. Magiging krimen lang po pag dito sa teritoryo ng Pilipinas sila nagtalik o nagsama.

    • @jinorayla268
      @jinorayla268 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@FiscalEJ maraming maraming salamat po fiscal SA pagsagot SA ktanungan k...god bless you always po🙏🙏🙏🙏

  • @rainb5987
    @rainb5987 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    The Congress should overhaul the revised penal code. Andaming nakakatakot na provision na kailangan ng palitan dahil sa katandaan. Pres. Marcos should certify as urgent a new criminal code.

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Your point is well-taken.

  • @camp460
    @camp460 2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

    Good evening Fiscal. While revisiting this very interesting lecture of yours. I can recall that in pari delicto does not apply in these crimes. Yet, in a situation where the spouses were living separately for a long period of time since both agreed to separate ways. Can it not be treated as implied consent from each other to engage in such acts? Where consequently, the husband cohabited with another woman and the wife cohabited with another man.
    Is it right to presume that they may still file cases against each other?
    Thank you for providing this lecture on this platform Fiscal, so we can visit and review this lesson anytime. More power to you.

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      Hi. The old case of People v. Guinucud, I think, applies to the situation above. Yes, you are correct that the doctrine of in pari delicto is a civil law principle which is not applicable in adultery. Akin, however, to the doctrine of in pari delicto is the doctrine of consent which is a bar to a criminal action for either adultery or concubinage.
      If both husband and wife have agreed to live separately and both have cohabited with another person, then that can be interpreted as consent which bars the husband and the wife to institute criminal proceedings against each other.

    • @camp460
      @camp460 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ​@@FiscalEJ Thank you so much Fiscal. I will keep this in mind.

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@camp460 you're welcome. good luck in your studies.

  • @mariacristinalabor4846
    @mariacristinalabor4846 2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

    good morning fiscal, what if they agreed to separate ways (defacto separation) then one of the parties(either the wife or the husband) engaged in either adultery or concubinage as the case may be, can the offended party file a case?

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว +3

      1. If they only agreed to separate but there was no agreement that either of them can enter into a relationship with another person, then technically, the "offended spouse" can file a case against the "offending spouse."
      2. But if the "offended spouse", even after having knowledge of the infidelity of the other does not take legal action for an unreasonable length of time, it can be interpreted that the "offended spouse" has condoned the adulterous relationship of the other.

  • @sharlaigneleo639
    @sharlaigneleo639 ปีที่แล้ว

    Pano po sir kung ntlo ka po sa ksong concubinage at vawc ibig bang sbihin non mlya na ang husband mo at si concubine nya na mgsama na clang tuluyan.need aswr po

  • @pw_p3w670
    @pw_p3w670 ปีที่แล้ว

    Fiscal paano po kung nagka anak ung babae sa kabit na lalake.at nag sasama sila sa iisang bahay. Saan po pwde sampahan ng kaso..?kung magkaibang lugar kami..salamat po

  • @christianpauld.aguirre3629
    @christianpauld.aguirre3629 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Maraming salamat Po Atty

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      You're welcome po

  • @Loukas19
    @Loukas19 ปีที่แล้ว

    Ano po difference ng penalties ng adultery at concubinage

  • @darlenelapuz4302
    @darlenelapuz4302 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hello..thus, sexual vedio can be a proof of concubinage????

  • @joeypatrickhisola7057
    @joeypatrickhisola7057 ปีที่แล้ว

    New subscriber hereee

  • @mariajosehfautam8825
    @mariajosehfautam8825 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    gud mrning po Fiscal.Ask ko lng po Fiscal kung halimbawa dun sa Concubinage po, na-Satisfy po ung 1st and 2nd Element. Pro ung 3rd Element po, mukhang in question pa po bcoz the other woman and even the husband alleged or claimed that wla pong alam c other woman na may asawa pla c husband. c husband po ay nagpa kilalang single xa dun ky other woman. kaya napa "Oo" nya c other woman.
    pag ganun po b Fiscal, hndi po ma prosper ang filing of concubinage...? madismis lng po?

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Sorry for the late response.
      Claim lang po nila yun na hindi alam ng "other woman". Matter of defense po kasi nila yan. Kung totoo man na hindi alam ng babae, ang madidismiss lang ay yung sa kaso laban sa other woman pero magpapatuloy ang kaso laban sa husband.

  • @ervicgavieres
    @ervicgavieres 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    What is a proof of cohabitation? Are we talking about actual, physical proof? Are witness statements enough to stand in court?

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      The term "cohabit" means to dwell together, in the manner of husband and wife, for some period of time, as distinguished from occasional, transient interviews for unlawful intercourse.
      It is not necessary that there be actual, direct proof of cohabitation. If can be proven by circumstantial evidence as when several witnesses testify in open court to the effect that they saw the couple stay inside a house or dwelling for some period of time.

  • @lilielm3728
    @lilielm3728 ปีที่แล้ว

    Hi Fiscal 👋
    May recent jurisprudence regarding sa defense sa bigamy cases, kung saan prejudicial question yung prior void marriage and pwede siyang i-raise na defense. Tanong ko lang po, pwede kayang maging defense din yun sa adultery or concubinage cases?
    Thank you so much po

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  ปีที่แล้ว

      The answer to ur question po can be found at the 05:00 mark of the video. 😊

  • @wadasfive7571
    @wadasfive7571 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good am Fiscal, may katanungan po ako sir, kasi ang complainant nagsampa ng rape, (victim 7 y/o) (respondent great-grandfather) incestuous rape ata tawag dun. Iniwan ng magulang ang bata sa lolo ng few weeks at ng kunin ng magulang ang bata napansin daw nila ang bata palaging nakahawak sa private part niya kapag natutulog, kaya naghinala ang magulang na may masamang nangyari sa bata, Thereafter inireklamo sa barangay ang lolo for rape, at the time na pina medico legal yung bata at ang resulta negative naman, no indication of laceration or other possibility of rape. Pero ang isang anak ng lolo secretly na picturan niya ang medico legal at yun ang depensa nila sa barangay na walang rape na nangyari.
    Ang tanong ko po sir, bawal ba kunan by means of photo or video ang evince ng kabilang partido or complainant?..kasi po sa barangay pinagmulta yung nag picture ng medico legal dahil bawal daw? Thank you so much sir and Good Bless

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Your comment is not related to this video. Next time, please, post only comments or questions related to the topic para hindi malito ang mga viewers. Anyway, i will still answer ur question.
      Una, walang authority ang barangay na mag pataw ng multa. Hindi na kailangan idaan pa sa barangay ang kasong rape. Dapat dumerecho na sa police station para masampahan ng reklamo ang nanggahasa.
      Pangalawa, bawal picturan dahil tungkol sa bata ang nakalagay sa medical certificate. Maari lamang manghingi ng kopya ang kabilang partido pag may kaso ng nai-file sa piskalya.
      At pangatlo, hindi ibig sabihin na dahil walang lacerations eh wala ng rape. Hindi kailangang maipasok talaga ang ari nang lalaki sa butas ng babae. Tas may mga instances na kahit naipasok na ang ari ng lalaki, hindi nasusugatan o walang laceration ang hymen.

  • @joncapo5520
    @joncapo5520 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good day sir, if ever a spouse was guilty for adultery, may karapatan pa ba siya sa mga properties kahit isang centavo wala naman siyang naambag, more power po at salamat

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว +1

      Hindi kasi sakop ng adultery case ang tungkol sa conjugal property. The only issue to be resolved in an adultery case is whether or not the wife had sexual intercourse with a man who is not her husband.

  • @joncapo5520
    @joncapo5520 2 ปีที่แล้ว

    Good day sir, yung conversation sa messenger namin ng kabit ni misis ay pwede na bang maging ebidencya at clearly na may relasyon sila which is alam ng parent ng kabit at alam ng mga anak ko at nameet nila personally ang kabit, pwede at solid na ba na ebidensya yun, TY po & more power sayo Fiscal

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      Ano po ba ang conversation na nakalagay dun? Inadmit nya po ba na may nangyari sa kanila ng asawa mo?

    • @joncapo5520
      @joncapo5520 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      ang sabi nya na may video daw sila pero not directly na sex video pagkasabi nya, pero anamin naman ng kabit na mayrelasyon sila kasi natutulog na yung wife ko sa bahay nila

    • @FiscalEJ
      @FiscalEJ  2 ปีที่แล้ว

      @@joncapo5520 so hanggang ngayon nagsasama na sila ng asawa mo?

    • @joncapo5520
      @joncapo5520 2 ปีที่แล้ว

      di naman sila nagsasama sir, bali pumupunta lang ang babae dun sa kanila matulog ng 2 nights, tapos pag uuwi na daw ako sa pinas bali dun daw titira ang babae sa kanila yan mga conversation namin.