It would be nice, but highly doubtful. They were never truly close to begin with. Look what happened between Rodger Waters and David Gilmour. After the lawsuit things between them changed forever.
@@TheDarkDutchmanOne real hit? Out of touch? Kiss on my list? Maneater? You make my dreams? Rich girl? Im not even a VERY big fan yet even i can name quite a few off the top of my head..
@@alshotrodgarage4779 "They" don't need money, Daryl sure doesn't at least, but maybe John does, even though he's definitely made exponentially-more than the average person ever does in their life so I don't think he needed to do this any more than he needed to buy another swimming pool or island or whatever. It's just weird as hell and seems like a power move to try fucking over Daryl by forcing him to deal with who or whatever ends up buying John's half. I've defended John a lot over the years but this is a shit move on his part.
@@jerrythomas4457 Yes. At this stage in their lives, the last thing they should be doing is fighting each other. As we grow older, we are supposed to grow wiser. Is there no hope? That is what I am sad about. Given the way of the world today...I guess there is no hope.
@@maryannlockwood7806 Agree 110% It is extremely Sad & I really hope they will reconcile, I really think they are both better than this - Absolutely Heartbreaking ❤️🩹
The disrespect of selling without telling him or offering him the option of buying him out is the problem. I agree with Hall. He should give him the option of buying THEIR music.
Wish the reporter would have asked this most basic and pertinent question: "Did you give Hall the first option to buy, and if so, what was his response, and if not, why not?" Now we're left to just guess.
Hall and Oates are no longer together, but their music will go on forever. I have been listening to them since 1976, their music was so good that WDAO which was a Soul Music station in Dayton Ohio back in the 70s would play their music. We called their music blue eyed soul music back then, with songs like "Sarah Smile", and "She's Gone".
@@gangoffour6690 I think their catalog would be worth hundreds of millions. Hall and Oates had several number 1 hits. Whomever holds the catalog rights stands to make a lot of money. John Oates has not been good with his money wasting so much money on fast cars etc. Now he is at the point where he needs to sell his half of the catalog to maintain his current lifestyle, but I agree with Daryl Hall not to sell it, unless they both agree on it.
@@sirmadam8183 Once a longtime friend files a lawsuit against you, it permanently alters the relationship. Things never go back to the way they use to. I speak from firsthand experience.
Issues? The issue is Mr. Oats blind sided Daryl and tried to stick him with a partner he did not want. John is an a-hole forcing Daryl into a partnership he did not approve of. Yes it is done all the time, and every time it is an underhanded back stab! He wasn't freeing Daryl up like he lies about in this interview he was saddling him with nothing but strife.
@@DIDYOUSEETHAT172 wow, you are so mad about something that happens to someone who doesn’t even know you exist and they wouldn’t care about you if even if they did know you were alive. People are wild in 2024
@@xerxestelevision6666 I am a singer, song writer, and I own a demo studio. And yes I know them both. My brother has played with and worked in studio with them both. So you keyboard f@@@HHead have no idea what you are talking about. And yes I am pissed at the way it was done.
Same here. Born is 85. My mom used to listen to there tapes everyday driving me to summer camp in the 90s. Lots of special feelings come from the music.
I opened for them for 50 shows in 05/06. There was a coldness between them, but the music and the band was always stellar. I watched a lot of shows backstage after my set every night. Good times.
@@AshleyScottMusic The files? Music or photos? Good to see ya. Sign up again if you want to, keep in touch with me. I have a new channel, putting out new music and videos too. Cheers!
I agree. The Allen sisters sold their shares in the Hall & Oates catalog years ago with little fanfare. Plus Oates share is at best one-third. So I can only assume Oates is right that Daryl doesn’t approve of the publishing company not necessarily selling off his share.
I bet they had some GAY moments that are really 'haunting' them. Anytime there is this 'wierd' energy with a broke-up band, i.e. Queenryche, my mind always goes there... like something happened that you can't come back from.
Then he should sell HIS solo catalog - how on earth can you sell off half of a duo w/o it screwing over the other party. IF John sells off his half, he's also selling off Darryl's half, i.e.: his image, his voice & his writing. That's just ridiculous. He should have asked Darryl to buy him out and then he's sole owner of his image too - John willing sells his to him.
On every album, there would be one or two songs that featured John Oates. They even released some as singles. I recall one called Possession Obsession. It tanked, despite a cool video on MTV. He rose to fame on Daryl Hall's coattails.
Amen. That's exactly what I was wondering. Perhaps, he did and Daryl couldn't give him what he wanted. It's disappointing that they aren't close... and probably never really were.
@@Porkcylinder Thanks. Of course. No doubt about that. I was just wondering, you know, to see how the relationship is/was. I think it's a very interesting question, apart from whether Oates is entitled to sell it to whoever he wants. Oates is I think.
It only matters if Darryl can afford to buy oates's half. What if someone offered oates more money? Would you sell your half of something you own to the top bidder? I would.
Hall has always been the lead singer and I don’t remember any of the hits with Oates singing lead on anything but I do know he knew how to play the heck out of that guitar. Their sound is obviously the result of their combined creativity because there is a reason why Hall never went solo. I hope they can work it out. They are definitely a huge part of the soundtrack of the 80s.
Daryl Hall released his first solo album (Sacred Songs) in 1980, he had Robert Fripp of King Crimson playing guitar on it. It was actually recorded in 1977 but the record label didn’t want to release it then as they thought it was too uncommercial as it was an art rock album rather than a straight pop/rock one.
The issue with John selling his half meant that Primary Wave,who he was selling it to,could then use their music,videos,etc.. for anything. Darryl Hall’s voice and image could be used for things he doesn’t agree with,and he wouldn’t be able to do anything about it. John Oates mentioned legal wrangling before he decided to sell,but there was no lawsuit until he attempted to sell his half. He called Darryl and told him he was going to do it,Darryl explained why he couldn’t allow it,and they argued. Both told that story before the lawsuit.
@@toddabbruzzese3974 haha damn.... todd is a perceptive dude. I mean, you're right. He could have gotten with Darryl and just asked him to HELP HIM find a buyer that DARRYL was down with and avoid any arguing and lawsuits. How does John not just pick up a phone and call Darryl and discuss and say hey, I just want out so can you buy my part or help me find a buyer you like?
@@toddabbruzzese3974 LOL!! I so wanted to make the observation regarding the shite p.s but ya bet me to it! It's sooo freakin' apparent once a person gets over a certain age, that they've had work done and it ain't pretty👹👺🤡
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm not sure he's required to do that. If I own a large number of shares in a company, I'm able to sell them to anyone I want. In fact, this kind of thing happens daily, where hedge funds and billionaires sell off their part of ownership in a company, without consulting anyone else. But I'm not sure how the law applies to the "corporation" that is Hall & Oates.
You can't take Hall out of Hall and Oats anymore than you can take Oats out of Hall and Oats. That part of the meal has been already been baked. Future revenues, brands, likeness, etc. So I would contend you can't sell off the jointly held assets without both parties being in agreement. They have to agree to share the proceeds of the sale of the assets, not the worth of the business, to which they both still participate. I am no lawyer, just play one on TV
@@abebrock5559 we don't know the nature of their agreement. My wife and I jointly own a home. If we divorced, she would have the option of buying my half or agreeing to split the proceeds of a sale. She cannot force me to own half of a house forever.
Brothers fight…but the love is always there. If they are not happy working together then don’t do it. They have made some Amazing music together and that will never be taken away. Wish them both good luck.
Millions of people pursue music and never get as lucky as these two have been together and they are throwing this gift to the world, and their relationship away...just brillant! Grow up boys!
A partnership in music is just like a marriage, not all marriages survive. That's just part of of life. If you don't feel comfortable with echother anymore you go seperate ways. I had a great friend, we knew each other over 20 years but we drifeted apart.last couple of years of our friendship. Wanted different things out of life. Should we stay friends just because we have that past? Hell no! We are both much happier now actually, living our own lives.
Do you pray to Jesus or cut out the middle man? Do you have to have your eyes closed? is it out loud, move you lips? tongues, does that get you a higher priority thread? what if he/she is busy working a field goal? can the devil hear you? Do I have to live with my X in heaven? Is the music better in hell? Do you have to kiss God's butt? these are some of the questions that kept me out of the really good schools...
**I hate when people play stupid. A phone call could have eliminated all of this.** “Hey, I’m interested in selling my half…based on the offers I receive, would you be interested in buying them so you’ll have total rights?” THE END!
You're dealing with celebrities who have the EQ of a 4 year old. How do I know? I was in the biz for 20 years and I saw it all and once in a while I was one of those 4 year olds.
So you thing Daryl has that much lose cash on hand to buy out his partner? Don’t think so. You ASSume too much. John has every right to sell, at a fair market value, his share of the business to anyone with the $$$$.
You know the world 🌎 needs help when Hall & Oates break up. I love their music and hopefully they will mend their music relationship but go on to enjoy the rest of their lives strife free.
Hearing this is so sad. I remembered first hearing Hall & Oats song from a video game I used to play a lot as a teenager, and still do into my adult' years.
Wow!! I grew up as a kid in the 80s listening to Hall & Oates with my big brother, who has since passed away. It was and is some of my best memories with my brother. I hope Hall & Oats can reconcile .
Live at Darryl’s house was one of the best tv shows I’ve ever seen. It gives you a good sense of who Darryl is, his love for music etc and it’s easy to see he’s a pretty down to earth cat. Their music catalog is worth tens of millions to each guy depending on writing credits etc and I see why John wanted to sell being in his 70’s. Too bad they couldn’t have hammered out an acceptable agreement without all the lawyers. There has to be a better way.
Agreed! There seems to be a certain selfishness with each of them. I love them both and I really wish they would come together for their fans because ultimately their fans is who they truly owe gratitude towards.
This is pretty sad. They're both old and probably don't have a lot of time left. John needs the money. Daryl should just let him get out. So strange to listen to john say those things about Daryl. I don't believe John doesn't feel like they were close like brothers in the 80s. I think he's just very angry and bitter about the lawsuit. It's going to take an emotional toll on both of them.
Darryl's house is all about fun, friends and love of music & BBQ... John had no business giving 50% of Darryl's life works to some company without even telling him.. That new owner could then do whatever they please with it
It is unfortunate that these former partners are in conflict. Oates was not clear at all about the reason for selling - what situation, what legal wranglings that got complex? Michael missed getting clarity on this. Then Oates later says they had no other issues prior to this. Something’s missing. I would definitely want to hear the other side.
I was thinking the same thing. Oates was very vague which kinda tells me he’s not totally in the right. The main thing I want to know is did he talk with Daryl first before he tired to sell. Because I’m getting betrayal as a factor in this scenario
I think the reason why Oates is vague about certain things is because it's still a legal dispute in progress, and Hall's lawyers can use anything specific Oates says against him or simply to make him look bad in the eyes of a judge.
Something smells a bit off. For him to make such a big move without even mentioning it to his partner, suggests a bit more turmoil under the surface than just a sterile business relationship.
"I had the right to do that" sounds to me that John didn't give Daryl the heads up about wanting to sell his portion of their music rights. I could see how Daryl might want to present and have input about his future roommate.
It always sounds like he didn't offer Daryl the 1/2 that he was wanting to sell. That is an attack on Daryl. REminds me of MIchael Jackson getting Paul McCartney to write and perform with him all the while buying the Beatle's catalog out from under him.
Daryl was not consulted about the business they both own. That there is where the root of the problem is. John literally backstabbed Daryl. I hope he gets him good in court!
@@1250GSX Yes McCartney was tring to buy the catalog...he was working on sucuring the funds. Jackson knew it and made sure his people kept it a secret he was after it. He even brought McCartney in to work on a song to keep him occupied. He never mentioned what he was doing. It was very calculated on Jackson's part...and a savage move too. Paul never talked to him after that.
I remember being told years ago about Daryl Hall and John Oates never really liking each other at all they would just play their music together and after go their separate ways. In fact, I was told they couldn't stand each other. When the person told me this I looked at him and said GTFOH. I guess there was some truth to what he told me. I loved listening to them as a young teenager. I still listen to their music. Thank you guys for putting out some classical hits that still stand out to this day.
Their company contract clearly states in writing that should one party decide to sell they must give the other partner FIRST RIGHTS OF REFUSAL. This lawsuit is because Oats violated this part of his contract and tried to sell to a third party. End of story.
I think the biggest bitter break up is CCR. It’s gone on for over 50 yrs and they’re not going to be around forever. I so wish the surviving members make peace and do one last performance together. But I doubt it will happen
@@gaynorpatterson2915 Yeah, it's a pretty bad sign (for eg.) that John and Tom never made amends before Tom died. They were BROTHERS, for God's sake! Damn.
I’m happy that John provided clarity on their battle with one another. From what he voiced it sounds like they both want different things with their musical careers and it’s nothing wrong with that. I can respect that. I just hope that they can get through this being at least cordial with one another.
John provided semi•clarity and it was from his perspective. In addition he was kinda of vague on the details. Like the real reason why he was selling his half, who he was selling his half to and did he talk with Daryl before he attempted to sell his half. Plus, I want to hear Daryl’s side. Not from court papers but from Daryl’s own lips.
I'm on Oates side. It sounds like Hall was preventing Oates from performing certain songs solo on the road. Oates got frustrated and try to sell to gets Hall attention. I always felt Hall was controlling and putting Oates in the back seat.
@@waynedexter yes, same old tunes. Oats is a beast singing his new album. I am more on oats side as a singer and musician. But who am I to tell you anything, right?
I am sure scores of groups did not get along - many LONG before the existance of S&G. It's just that certain groups or genres get the attention - like The Beach Boys, The Beatles, The Temptations, Sam & Dave, The Supremes, The Byrds, etc.
You’d think that at their age, Hall would just tell the lawyers, let’s resolve this fairly and equitably and with love and mutual respect, and then toast to having been together 50 years and wish each other the best. But instead there’s ego-driven pettiness and unhappiness. Wild. Mo’ money, mo’ problems.
Something tells me there's more to the story than either will reveal. I think it was really telling that John Oates said that for the last 20 years or so, they would just show up and play the concerts and then go their separate ways. Things may have built up between them to the point that they no longer spoke to each other, and now there's a lawsuit.
@QuirkyGirl10 I thought so myself. I remember somebody told me 20 years ago, Hall and Oates didn't get along in real life, but enjoy making music together. Even the show Behind the Music from 25 years ago, I believe John explained they were never that closed to begin with. Daryl wouldn't admit that. He mentioned they got along real great and enjoying being together. I think the problem with those two, they couldn't come in terms of agreement. I believed Daryl accepted John more than John accepted him. The main issue is, Daryl has a huge ego problem and he probably didn't know it was affecting his relationship with John. John on the hand, was trying to get out of Daryl's shadow for a long time but couldn't. I think John don't get along with Daryl on the persona level and Daryl don't get along with John on the business side of things. That's what I'm reading about their relationship.
@DK-455 The only thing Daryl got average over on John was that he had better writing lyrics and vocal. John was better at working instrumental and producing. Sure, John had a hand of writing some songs, but it wasn't that catchy like Daryl.
John & Daryl were great together ..... both obviously are competent WRITERS, SINGERS & MUSICIANS ..... John is good at all three ....... Daryl is great at them. His voice alone is unbelievable - just perfect for any song by anyone. RARE to say the least.
I really hope The Neptunes can get their legal issues sorted out. I'd hate for both these guys and one of the best producing duos of all time to split up over money.
It's money, yeah, but more so ownership of the rights to the music. Music that was created and owned "equally." As posted elsewhere, it's like deciding who gets custody of the dog. It's all or nothing.
This is sad, but the music industry can be a stressful nasty business and can get in the way of the creative joyous side. They put out some wonderful music together that will be treasured for a long long time. Best wishes to both John and Daryl.
It’s not the same thing. You can’t sell half a house, but you can sell half interest in other types of assets, and that includes films, movies, and music.
@@jaredjlinden evidently they had some agreement early on that one cannot sell without the others agreement or approval. And even with no agreement it would go to court and a judge would have to decide if one could sell 50% of partnership which could override the other partner.
If there’s an agreement that one partner has veto power over the sale to a third party, then Hall’s actions make sense. If there’s no clause in the partnership agreement, then Hall isn’t going to have much of a chance in court - legally Oates can sell without Hall’s approval. That’s the default without that clause.
@@jaredjlindenI'm guessing that there must be some clause in the partnership agreement preventing such a sale without the other's consent. Otherwise, a court would not have granted Hall's injunction.
I’ve seen divorcing couples sell a house and split the proceeds. Once it becomes legal, who can tell. This musical split is sad but Hall always seemed to be the face (and voice) of the group. I wish the two the best of luck.
I'm mainly a Daryl Hall fan but John Oates does a really nice job on some of their songs as the main vocalist: Had I known you better then, and then fast forward to Time won't pass me by, and also for a different style of singing The Christmas Song /Chestnuts roasting on an open fire, off their inspired Home for Christmas album (maybe they should listen again to the lyrics from the adult contemporary number one they had from it.. Midnight Clear...peace on Earth Goodwill towards men). 😉 th-cam.com/video/YOHIe5fRKhc/w-d-xo.htmlsi=p0uKbBC8js9Jm09l
@@kittangomy oldest two daughters absolutely love Hall & Oates and introduced me to many great song with John on lead. Here is the list they wanted me to share. Ice, Possession Obsession, Southeast City Window, If That's What Makes You Happy, Cold dark and Yesterday, Friday Let Me Down, Crazy Eyes, At Tension, Alone Too Long and Im Just a Kid (don't make me feel like a man). To name a few. Enjoy! 🎶😁
He has a right to sell HIS SHARE of it. There's zero doubt in that. It's his. It has no effect on Hall's ownership of his share. Hall will just have a different co-owner to deal with, but he'll still have a say in how his music is used.
What’s he talking about? Daryl has been a respected solo artist for YEARS. Daryl can make it without John but John can’t make it without Daryl. Daryl has the greater voice.
Doesn't matter. He's living in the Hall and Oates shadow forever. The wacky music business don't care for the old. They want fresh blood to screw over!
@@ronluckenbach9492 Oates has always been about the slow, folk music - even though he has blak in him. While Hall was about Motown soul - even though he too made that folk music to start, then a little new wave. So hall kind of funked the duo - or two artists up a bit.
At 71 been a fan for over 40 years please gentlemen get it together life is too short 😢 don't let money come between you all will always love Hall and Oates ❤❤ ❤🎉
This is absolutely heartbreaking. I had no idea this is the way they worked. As a young girl in the 70 & 80's this my band. I love their music. 😢 So so sad.
Well, we as fans will forever cherish the music that you gentlemen released over the years. The only unfortunate thing about this is that I missed out on my opportunity to see you guys live. But it's amazing that we see the great chemistry that these two have and for years, they weren't as close as we thought they were. It's said that it has come to this but being that they're in their mid to late 70's and spent over 50 years performing together, I don't blame them for calling it quits. Thank you for all the music and I wish you both success in life and with your solo careers!
This is definitely more complicated than selling half of a catalog. The new partner would have access to their likeness, videos, and their legacy. New technology makes them vulnerable.
…as a kid, I always thought that John Oates wasn’t enough to be besides Daryl Hall, he was in my POV just "a somebody" living out ot of the talent and voice of Daryl…. 40 years after I think the same, John…. You should be extremely grateful and respectful with Daryl Hall, what you have now and will have forever is because of Him, not you. Period.
Hall and Oates are fighting? I can't go for that
😂😂😂
🏆
😂😂 nice
No can do
😅😅😂
I get the impression that he and Daryl were never really "best friends," but rather two guys who just worked really well together.
They used to be.
It seems like a marriage that just Finally ENDED.
@@billnyethesciencedenier1516I think they were at one time
They were gay lovers but like any other relationship it ended...
I think you’re right.
May Daryl and John resolve their issues, they are so good together, musically
With only one real hit???? Naaah....🤣
@@TheDarkDutchmanbad opinion man
Like A Married Couple 😞😞😞😞
It would be nice, but highly doubtful. They were never truly close to begin with. Look what happened between Rodger Waters and David Gilmour. After the lawsuit things between them changed forever.
@@TheDarkDutchmanOne real hit? Out of touch? Kiss on my list? Maneater? You make my dreams? Rich girl? Im not even a VERY big fan yet even i can name quite a few off the top of my head..
Jesus. Daryl Hall is 77 years ago and John Oates is 76... gentleman, just enjoy the last chapter and chill out.
They need money? It’s like Dillon selling his catalog
Now to Roger Waters and David Gilmore!
@@alshotrodgarage4779 "They" don't need money, Daryl sure doesn't at least, but maybe John does, even though he's definitely made exponentially-more than the average person ever does in their life so I don't think he needed to do this any more than he needed to buy another swimming pool or island or whatever. It's just weird as hell and seems like a power move to try fucking over Daryl by forcing him to deal with who or whatever ends up buying John's half. I've defended John a lot over the years but this is a shit move on his part.
Yep
No. Not Jesus. Daryl.
This makes me sad. They made such beautiful music together.
I’m with you. I became a fan in 1982 when they wereon Dick clark’s Rockin Eve. It makes me sad.😢
Does it really make you sad?
@@jerrythomas4457 Yes. At this stage in their lives, the last thing they should be doing is fighting each other. As we grow older, we are supposed to grow wiser. Is there no hope? That is what I am sad about. Given the way of the world today...I guess there is no hope.
@@maryannlockwood7806 Agree 110% It is extremely Sad & I really hope they will reconcile, I really think they are both better than this - Absolutely Heartbreaking ❤️🩹
@@v.a.993Yeah man they probably have another 10 years on earth. It's really sad.
The disrespect of selling without telling him or offering him the option of buying him out is the problem. I agree with Hall. He should give him the option of buying THEIR music.
I agree, he should have offered Daryl the option b4 moving ahead with the sale.🤔
Only reason he did it was to piss him off. Probably pissed that he went solo and is more successful….
Wish the reporter would have asked this most basic and pertinent question: "Did you give Hall the first option to buy, and if so, what was his response, and if not, why not?" Now we're left to just guess.
That's my thinking too. Give Daryl first dibs.
💯
It sucks to see them fighting 😔 Good music they made together 💔
Yes Yoda, Good music, together, they made.
Hall and Oates are no longer together, but their music will go on forever. I have been listening to them since 1976, their music was so good that WDAO which was a Soul Music station in Dayton Ohio back in the 70s would play their music. We called their music blue eyed soul music back then, with songs like "Sarah Smile", and "She's Gone".
Tigolebitties❤😂
I can't see their catalog having much value at this point in time.
@@gangoffour6690 I think their catalog would be worth hundreds of millions. Hall and Oates had several number 1 hits. Whomever holds the catalog rights stands to make a lot of money. John Oates has not been good with his money wasting so much money on fast cars etc. Now he is at the point where he needs to sell his half of the catalog to maintain his current lifestyle, but I agree with Daryl Hall not to sell it, unless they both agree on it.
I hope they resolve their issues. I grew up listening to their music in the 1980's
@@sirmadam8183 Once a longtime friend files a lawsuit against you, it permanently alters the relationship. Things never go back to the way they use to. I speak from firsthand experience.
Oooooooohhhh
Issues? The issue is Mr. Oats blind sided Daryl and tried to stick him with a partner he did not want. John is an a-hole forcing Daryl into a partnership he did not approve of. Yes it is done all the time, and every time it is an underhanded back stab! He wasn't freeing Daryl up like he lies about in this interview he was saddling him with nothing but strife.
@@DIDYOUSEETHAT172 wow, you are so mad about something that happens to someone who doesn’t even know you exist and they wouldn’t care about you if even if they did know you were alive. People are wild in 2024
@@xerxestelevision6666 I am a singer, song writer, and I own a demo studio. And yes I know them both. My brother has played with and worked in studio with them both. So you keyboard f@@@HHead have no idea what you are talking about. And yes I am pissed at the way it was done.
They sure ruled the 80's airwaves. Them & Phil Collins.
They burned out after “Big Bam Boom” (1984). Wish they had had continued.
they rockt
@PaulinaVeneziathey had their own niche of music that many enjoyed. I wouldn’t say they ruled the 80s but rather the mid-70s until 1984.
@PaulinaVenezia okay mate. You have your opinion, that’s awesome. Let me have mine.
@PaulinaVenezia okay mate. Your opinions trump everyone else’s. Got it!
As an 80’s baby and a fan of Hall & Oates…this is so sad to me.😢😢😢 Happy for Oates and his new album though.
Me too 😥
@@kayrup3712Me three 😢
There is legal right
Then moral right
Oats not discussing it with Hall it is wrong.
No offer of first refusal? thats wrong
Same here. Born is 85. My mom used to listen to there tapes everyday driving me to summer camp in the 90s. Lots of special feelings come from the music.
Good luck John, but I ordered Daryl’s cd. “D” it drops in a few days.
Making really long relationships work is HARD. Peace to both of them.
long and really close relationships* - being acquaintances/friends for a really long time is a lot easier.
I'm so sad Daryl and John hav falln out. Their music together brought me so much pleasure and still does.
Hall, "You're out of touch!" Oats, "I'm out of time."
Well you know it dont matter anyway.
I opened for them for 50 shows in 05/06. There was a coldness between them, but the music and the band was always stellar. I watched a lot of shows backstage after my set every night. Good times.
Who felt human?
@@pokemonpro8438mmhm… almost like I was there.. good comment .. both of them
Darryl seems like a complete prick
I was at those shows and still have the files from that night. I used to be on your email list. Hope all is well.
@@AshleyScottMusic The files? Music or photos? Good to see ya. Sign up again if you want to, keep in touch with me. I have a new channel, putting out new music and videos too. Cheers!
These two made so much magical music together. Very sad that they are fighting each other.
You are right.
This interview screams "there is WAY more going on"
I agree. The Allen sisters sold their shares in the Hall & Oates catalog years ago with little fanfare. Plus Oates share is at best one-third. So I can only assume Oates is right that Daryl doesn’t approve of the publishing company not necessarily selling off his share.
Ok…love em like a brother made me ok….I am ok.
I bet they had some GAY moments that are really 'haunting' them. Anytime there is this 'wierd' energy with a broke-up band, i.e. Queenryche, my mind always goes there... like something happened that you can't come back from.
@@Jgeneraledger23 I don't work very hard to conjure up thoughts of them having sex together. Probably just me
Yup, he could have gave Hall first right of refusal.
Glad John Oats is going on his own with new music. Hoping they are both happy. Life’s too short.
His "new music" is weak - and a sure cure for insomnia! 😪😴
Then he should sell HIS solo catalog - how on earth can you sell off half of a duo w/o it screwing over the other party. IF John sells off his half, he's also selling off Darryl's half, i.e.: his image, his voice & his writing. That's just ridiculous. He should have asked Darryl to buy him out and then he's sole owner of his image too - John willing sells his to him.
John Oates has a beautiful voice. He is every bit as talented as Daryl Hall. I love them both.
get yo ears checked
On every album, there would be one or two songs that featured John Oates. They even released some as singles. I recall one called Possession Obsession. It tanked, despite a cool video on MTV. He rose to fame on Daryl Hall's coattails.
@@ozjumpermann1610 Exactly 100% true
As talented as a singer? Are you actually being serious?
Wrong
For me, there's only one relevant question here:"Did Oates offer his share to Hall first?".
Amen. That's exactly what I was wondering. Perhaps, he did and Daryl couldn't give him what he wanted. It's disappointing that they aren't close... and probably never really were.
Agree 100%. He owed it to Hall to at least offer his shares. Whether he did and Hall turned him down, for whatever reason, we may never know.
He’s perfectly entitled so sell to whoever he sees fit and without consultation
@@Porkcylinder Thanks.
Of course. No doubt about that. I was just wondering, you know, to see how the relationship is/was. I think it's a very interesting question, apart from whether Oates is entitled to sell it to whoever he wants. Oates is I think.
It only matters if Darryl can afford to buy oates's half. What if someone offered oates more money? Would you sell your half of something you own to the top bidder? I would.
You should interview Daryl Hall next, to get his opinion....
They tried and he didn’t respond.
@@davek7892 Hmmm...something is missing with this story, don't you think?
YES!
@@REGGIRT-4011yes,I believe so.
he cant go for that......
Hall has always been the lead singer and I don’t remember any of the hits with Oates singing lead on anything but I do know he knew how to play the heck out of that guitar. Their sound is obviously the result of their combined creativity because there is a reason why Hall never went solo. I hope they can work it out. They are definitely a huge part of the soundtrack of the 80s.
Possession Obsession has Oates singing lead. Good song and he sounds good. Think it made the top ten when it came out.
Hall did go solo as did Oats made their own albums
Daryl Hall released his first solo album (Sacred Songs) in 1980, he had Robert Fripp of King Crimson playing guitar on it. It was actually recorded in 1977 but the record label didn’t want to release it then as they thought it was too uncommercial as it was an art rock album rather than a straight pop/rock one.
The issue with John selling his half meant that Primary Wave,who he was selling it to,could then use their music,videos,etc.. for anything. Darryl Hall’s voice and image could be used for things he doesn’t agree with,and he wouldn’t be able to do anything about it. John Oates mentioned legal wrangling before he decided to sell,but there was no lawsuit until he attempted to sell his half. He called Darryl and told him he was going to do it,Darryl explained why he couldn’t allow it,and they argued. Both told that story before the lawsuit.
💯 agree with Darryl’s decision….
if Oates was being 100% benign, he would have offered Hall first dibs to buy HIS OWN SHIT BACK. bad plastic surgery as well
@@toddabbruzzese3974 haha damn.... todd is a perceptive dude. I mean, you're right. He could have gotten with Darryl and just asked him to HELP HIM find a buyer that DARRYL was down with and avoid any arguing and lawsuits. How does John not just pick up a phone and call Darryl and discuss and say hey, I just want out so can you buy my part or help me find a buyer you like?
Exactly. John wants to make even more millions off of Darryl's voice, which is primarily what he's done for 50+ years.
@@toddabbruzzese3974 LOL!! I so wanted to make the observation regarding the shite p.s but ya bet me to it! It's sooo freakin' apparent once a person gets over a certain age, that they've had work done and it ain't pretty👹👺🤡
Honestly?
Seeing these two fighting with each other, is heartbreaking.
That’s how many fans Hall and Oates have, worldwide.
It is heartbreaking. I agree
😢 I mean they are the backdrop to a lot of Our Lives it's so sad to see
@@MrBarrywes
Seriously.
if you think that have been best buds for the last 30 years you have been living in dreamland.
@@krusher74 that’s not my point…
Oates went to my high school and they played in our gym. Good times right around Sarah Smile. My older sister knew him. Come on guys.
Thanks for sharing friend. I'm sure your good wishes will make a difference if only a small one.
Thanks for Sharing!!!
It's a sad day when Hall and Oates are fighting. Who would've thought?
Hall & Oates- 50 years..........wham! Four years. It happens😅
Never they were my favorite band as a kid and of all time. Thankfully my 2nd favorite band is still together 50 years in 2025
I know Right!!!
I think it would be a basic courtesy to consult Hall about who the preferred buyer would/could be.
*"THAT PART"*
I'm not a lawyer, but I'm not sure he's required to do that. If I own a large number of shares in a company, I'm able to sell them to anyone I want. In fact, this kind of thing happens daily, where hedge funds and billionaires sell off their part of ownership in a company, without consulting anyone else. But I'm not sure how the law applies to the "corporation" that is Hall & Oates.
You can't take Hall out of Hall and Oats anymore than you can take Oats out of Hall and Oats. That part of the meal has been already been baked. Future revenues, brands, likeness, etc. So I would contend you can't sell off the jointly held assets without both parties being in agreement. They have to agree to share the proceeds of the sale of the assets, not the worth of the business, to which they both still participate.
I am no lawyer, just play one on TV
@@abebrock5559 we don't know the nature of their agreement. My wife and I jointly own a home. If we divorced, she would have the option of buying my half or agreeing to split the proceeds of a sale. She cannot force me to own half of a house forever.
@@utubewillyman How do you sale half a recorded song? Especially since it involves future revenues as well.
The 80's wasn't just a decade, it all was an emotion.
Brothers fight…but the love is always there. If they are not happy working together then don’t do it. They have made some Amazing music together and that will never be taken away. Wish them both good luck.
They're not brothers, qhy do you insist calling them that when they don't even look at one another thusly?
Millions of people pursue music and never get as lucky as these two have been together and they are throwing this gift to the world, and their relationship away...just brillant! Grow up boys!
A partnership in music is just like a marriage, not all marriages survive. That's just part of of life. If you don't feel comfortable with echother anymore you go seperate ways. I had a great friend, we knew each other over 20 years but we drifeted apart.last couple of years of our friendship. Wanted different things out of life. Should we stay friends just because we have that past? Hell no! We are both much happier now actually, living our own lives.
@@dancelover020 I don't know what you call a friend, but generally, they're meant to be together for a lifetime.
@@nidranrebreski2828 No. A friend can be for a lifetime and a friend can be come into and go out of your life.
Praying both can work it out. Love the music 😊
Do you pray to Jesus or cut out the middle man? Do you have to have your eyes closed? is it out loud, move you lips? tongues, does that get you a higher priority thread? what if he/she is busy working a field goal? can the devil hear you? Do I have to live with my X in heaven? Is the music better in hell? Do you have to kiss God's butt? these are some of the questions that kept me out of the really good schools...
**I hate when people play stupid. A phone call could have eliminated all of this.**
“Hey, I’m interested in selling my half…based on the offers I receive, would you be interested in buying them so you’ll have total rights?” THE END!
It seemed like John had been trying but had given up. Daryl is not the easiest person to deal with.
@@brownin329 When did John Oates say that? When did he offer Daryl Hall his half?
You're dealing with celebrities who have the EQ of a 4 year old. How do I know? I was in the biz for 20 years and I saw it all and once in a while I was one of those 4 year olds.
Even with Daryl being wealthy that half would be way beyond his means. The fool in your name is worthy of being there.
So you thing Daryl has that much lose cash on hand to buy out his partner? Don’t think so. You ASSume too much. John has every right to sell, at a fair market value, his share of the business to anyone with the $$$$.
You know the world 🌎 needs help when Hall & Oates break up. I love their music and hopefully they will mend their music relationship but go on to enjoy the rest of their lives strife free.
Facts smh
Hearing this is so sad. I remembered first hearing Hall & Oats song from a video game I used to play a lot as a teenager, and still do into my adult' years.
Saw these guys at a concert back in 1985, they're music was so amazing!
This breaks my heart. I love them.
😂
I feel the exact same way. I grew up listening to their music. This is so sad to me.
Me to.
Music of my childhood. Still love their music
Facts
I don’t understand how you even begin to divide something two people built together...
Amen. All their of the music they had made. Thus is just sickening.
50/50. Pretty easy with two people.
If he wants to sell his half, he should give Hall the first right of refusal. That seems a fair way to divide it.
I dunno people get divorced all the time.
@@shawnstarks1743that was just what i was thinking
Wow!! I grew up as a kid in the 80s listening to Hall & Oates with my big brother, who has since passed away. It was and is some of my best memories with my brother. I hope Hall & Oats can reconcile .
😘🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾 bless your brotha's soul and Yes Hall and Oates 🥰👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾
🙏 ❤
Hugs
Looks like John simply cannot "Rely on the Ole Man's Money" any longer.
It's very sad that their feuding together, but I always listened to Hall and Oates every day.
Live at Darryl’s house was one of the best tv shows I’ve ever seen. It gives you a good sense of who Darryl is, his love for music etc and it’s easy to see he’s a pretty down to earth cat.
Their music catalog is worth tens of millions to each guy depending on writing credits etc and I see why John wanted to sell being in his 70’s. Too bad they couldn’t have hammered out an acceptable agreement without all the lawyers. There has to be a better way.
Agreed! There seems to be a certain selfishness with each of them. I love them both and I really wish they would come together for their fans because ultimately their fans is who they truly owe gratitude towards.
Darryl didn’t want to co own the catalog with someone or a company who might be a creep if Oates sold his share.
This is pretty sad. They're both old and probably don't have a lot of time left. John needs the money. Daryl should just let him get out. So strange to listen to john say those things about Daryl. I don't believe John doesn't feel like they were close like brothers in the 80s. I think he's just very angry and bitter about the lawsuit. It's going to take an emotional toll on both of them.
John Oates needs the money, but Daryl doesn't.
Darryl's house is all about fun, friends and love of music & BBQ... John had no business giving 50% of Darryl's life works to some company without even telling him.. That new owner could then do whatever they please with it
No matter how many solo albums each of them puts out, the fans are still going to prefer the 80's classics performed by both of them together.
This is like my two favorite uncles fighting, why?😢
Makes me sad. I'm glad he's in a good place musically, though. But...
And they are old enough to be your uncle's young man !
It is unfortunate that these former partners are in conflict. Oates was not clear at all about the reason for selling - what situation, what legal wranglings that got complex? Michael missed getting clarity on this. Then Oates later says they had no other issues prior to this. Something’s missing. I would definitely want to hear the other side.
He said it was becoming a burden legally that's enough for me, burdens are a downer😘
I was thinking the same thing. Oates was very vague which kinda tells me he’s not totally in the right. The main thing I want to know is did he talk with Daryl first before he tired to sell. Because I’m getting betrayal as a factor in this scenario
@@waynedexter My thoughts exactly. It's like a partner selling their half of a business to someone the other partner never agreed to.
I think the reason why Oates is vague about certain things is because it's still a legal dispute in progress, and Hall's lawyers can use anything specific Oates says against him or simply to make him look bad in the eyes of a judge.
@@LordEradicus That makes sense. But why discuss it at all if that’s the case?
The best thing that ever happened to John Oates is......
Daryl Hall!
Something smells a bit off. For him to make such a big move without even mentioning it to his partner, suggests a bit more turmoil under the surface than just a sterile business relationship.
"I had the right to do that" sounds to me that John didn't give Daryl the heads up about wanting to sell his portion of their music rights. I could see how Daryl might want to present and have input about his future roommate.
Darryl should've bought John's half of the catalog, situation solved.
It always sounds like he didn't offer Daryl the 1/2 that he was wanting to sell. That is an attack on Daryl. REminds me of MIchael Jackson getting Paul McCartney to write and perform with him all the while buying the Beatle's catalog out from under him.
Daryl was not consulted about the business they both own. That there is where the root of the problem is. John literally backstabbed Daryl. I hope he gets him good in court!
@@raythackston1960 Kind of reminded me of that too however the beatles catalogue was on the open market and McCartney was not one of the bidders.
@@1250GSX Yes McCartney was tring to buy the catalog...he was working on sucuring the funds. Jackson knew it and made sure his people kept it a secret he was after it. He even brought McCartney in to work on a song to keep him occupied. He never mentioned what he was doing. It was very calculated on Jackson's part...and a savage move too. Paul never talked to him after that.
Oates was a side car. Daryl Hall should be angry because his voice is the one that made them famous.
Agreed
I saw them in concert a few years ago and they were amazing even at their age. I hope they can work it out. They’re one of my favorite bands.
Darryl's VOICE is an instrument and makes their music - John would be selling that too to make his money- Whole thing is weird.
Those two were a part of the soundtrack of my youth . So sad the divide between them now .
Same.
They were part of my youth's soundtrack as well given that I'm an elder Millennial. When I heard about that lawsuit, it broke my heart.
I grew up skating to them... Sara Smile was my song with my 1st boyfriend on couples skate.... heartbreaking to see it happened 💔😢
I’m not sure why John didn’t offer his half to Daryl Hall instead of selling it someone else. I’d question that.
He has an amazing voice. Good for him!
I remember being told years ago about Daryl Hall and John Oates never really liking each other at all they would just play their music together and after go their separate ways. In fact, I was told they couldn't stand each other. When the person told me this I looked at him and said GTFOH. I guess there was some truth to what he told me. I loved listening to them as a young teenager. I still listen to their music. Thank you guys for putting out some classical hits that still stand out to this day.
Yeah this isn’t their first public fight
I mean they always looked like two uncles who couldn't stand each other so that puts a lid on my perspective hahahaha
Classic, NOT classical!
its just like a marriage and in the USA 52% now fail.
I dont beelieve that at all...
Their company contract clearly states in writing that should one party decide to sell they must give the other partner FIRST RIGHTS OF REFUSAL. This lawsuit is because Oats violated this part of his contract and tried to sell to a third party. End of story.
Sad, that this is happening. I grew up as young kid loving their songs and singing to it. Crazy
My dad introduced me to hall and Oates along with Emerson lake Palmer and Crosby stills Nash and young
It is like Simon and Garfunkel. So many partnerships and groups have gone through these type of things, like a marriage going over a bitter divorce.
I'd like to hear me some Garfunkel & Oates.
Garfunkel wanted to be an actor. Didn't turn out to be a great move.
I think the biggest bitter break up is CCR. It’s gone on for over 50 yrs and they’re not going to be around forever. I so wish the surviving members make peace and do one last performance together. But I doubt it will happen
@@gaynorpatterson2915 Yeah, it's a pretty bad sign (for eg.) that John and Tom never made amends before Tom died. They were BROTHERS, for God's sake! Damn.
John is wrong how are you going to sell and not have a talk with your partner, I think that's major a discussion needs to be had.
I’m happy that John provided clarity on their battle with one another. From what he voiced it sounds like they both want different things with their musical careers and it’s nothing wrong with that. I can respect that. I just hope that they can get through this being at least cordial with one another.
He seems like a whole new musician. Maybe Hall wants it to just play the old songs and the same rhythm.
@@laurenmay2098Hall just released new music so it ain’t that
John provided semi•clarity and it was from his perspective. In addition he was kinda of vague on the details. Like the real reason why he was selling his half, who he was selling his half to and did he talk with Daryl before he attempted to sell his half. Plus, I want to hear Daryl’s side. Not from court papers but from Daryl’s own lips.
I'm on Oates side. It sounds like Hall was preventing Oates from performing certain songs solo on the road. Oates got frustrated and try to sell to gets Hall attention. I always felt Hall was controlling and putting Oates in the back seat.
@@waynedexter yes, same old tunes. Oats is a beast singing his new album. I am more on oats side as a singer and musician. But who am I to tell you anything, right?
First Simon and Garfunkel and now this.😢
The Everly Brothers were first.
@@turdferguson3855 I'm sure there were other "firsts" centuries before the above examples. Popularity, though, will vary.
@@ironbowtie name me one.
S & G never got along, even when they were hot in their career
I am sure scores of groups did not get along - many LONG before the existance of S&G. It's just that certain groups or genres get the attention - like The Beach Boys, The Beatles, The Temptations, Sam & Dave, The Supremes, The Byrds, etc.
This tv presenter is too funny - can't stop thinking when he played the bully in Chuck 😂
You’d think that at their age, Hall would just tell the lawyers, let’s resolve this fairly and equitably and with love and mutual respect, and then toast to having been together 50 years and wish each other the best. But instead there’s ego-driven pettiness and unhappiness. Wild. Mo’ money, mo’ problems.
Something tells me there's more to the story than either will reveal. I think it was really telling that John Oates said that for the last 20 years or so, they would just show up and play the concerts and then go their separate ways. Things may have built up between them to the point that they no longer spoke to each other, and now there's a lawsuit.
@@QuirkyGirl10 You’re right and I also think Hall wrote most of the hits and doesn’t think Oats is entitled to half.
@QuirkyGirl10 I thought so myself. I remember somebody told me 20 years ago, Hall and Oates didn't get along in real life, but enjoy making music together. Even the show Behind the Music from 25 years ago, I believe John explained they were never that closed to begin with. Daryl wouldn't admit that. He mentioned they got along real great and enjoying being together. I think the problem with those two, they couldn't come in terms of agreement. I believed Daryl accepted John more than John accepted him. The main issue is, Daryl has a huge ego problem and he probably didn't know it was affecting his relationship with John. John on the hand, was trying to get out of Daryl's shadow for a long time but couldn't. I think John don't get along with Daryl on the persona level and Daryl don't get along with John on the business side of things. That's what I'm reading about their relationship.
I think Darryl feels he did most of the songwriting and all the lead vocals and John isn't entitled to half. I tend to agree.
@DK-455 The only thing Daryl got average over on John was that he had better writing lyrics and vocal. John was better at working instrumental and producing. Sure, John had a hand of writing some songs, but it wasn't that catchy like Daryl.
This broke my heart when I first heard about this! I wish them both nothing but the very best...
Hall & Oates are like Peanut Butter & Jelly minus the bread 🍞 they just go good together !💯
It is always about the money.
Why wouldn't it be?
True!!!
These guys were my first concert. Love them both. You guys are great together but wish you well on your solo efforts.
I wonder if Daryl Hall can actually prevent him from selling his half to whoever he wants to sell it to.
John & Daryl were great together ..... both obviously are competent WRITERS, SINGERS & MUSICIANS ..... John is good at all three ....... Daryl is great at them. His voice alone is unbelievable - just perfect for any song by anyone. RARE to say the least.
I really hope The Neptunes can get their legal issues sorted out. I'd hate for both these guys and one of the best producing duos of all time to split up over money.
It's money, yeah, but more so ownership of the rights to the music. Music that was created and owned "equally." As posted elsewhere, it's like deciding who gets custody of the dog. It's all or nothing.
This is sad, but the music industry can be a stressful nasty business and can get in the way of the creative joyous side. They put out some wonderful music together that will be treasured for a long long time. Best wishes to both John and Daryl.
I will never understand why people can't compromise. I hope these two men figure it out. I wish them all the best.
Compromise is impossible in some situations.
You can't sell your half of the house after divorce, same with music partnership songbook.
It’s not the same thing. You can’t sell half a house, but you can sell half interest in other types of assets, and that includes films, movies, and music.
@@jaredjlinden evidently they had some agreement early on that one cannot sell without the others agreement or approval. And even with no agreement it would go to court and a judge would have to decide if one could sell 50% of partnership which could override the other partner.
If there’s an agreement that one partner has veto power over the sale to a third party, then Hall’s actions make sense. If there’s no clause in the partnership agreement, then Hall isn’t going to have much of a chance in court - legally Oates can sell without Hall’s approval. That’s the default without that clause.
@@jaredjlindenI'm guessing that there must be some clause in the partnership agreement preventing such a sale without the other's consent. Otherwise, a court would not have granted Hall's injunction.
I’ve seen divorcing couples sell a house and split the proceeds. Once it becomes legal, who can tell. This musical split is sad but Hall always seemed to be the face (and voice) of the group. I wish the two the best of luck.
Why does everyone think we should ride off into the sunset 🌅 together?! 😂
This is so sad. I grew up listening to them bc my brother loved them!
Oats in all respects. You just see and feel your older self. It’s respect. I will support your decision and music.
Money can split up anyone.
You’re right about that, every band has something like that going on all the time!!!
It is too bad , they are both sooo talented and their songs are really great..
If you've never done a deep dive into the Hall & Oates catalogue there are some outstanding songs where John sang the lead.
kind of like being "Out of touch"
Can you give some examples? Would love to listen.
I'm mainly a Daryl Hall fan but John Oates does a really nice job on some of their songs as the main vocalist: Had I known you better then, and then fast forward to Time won't pass me by, and also for a different style of singing The Christmas Song /Chestnuts roasting on an open fire, off their inspired Home for Christmas album (maybe they should listen again to the lyrics from the adult contemporary number one they had from it.. Midnight Clear...peace on Earth Goodwill towards men). 😉 th-cam.com/video/YOHIe5fRKhc/w-d-xo.htmlsi=p0uKbBC8js9Jm09l
@@kittangomy oldest two daughters absolutely love Hall & Oates and introduced me to many great song with John on lead. Here is the list they wanted me to share. Ice, Possession Obsession, Southeast City Window, If That's What Makes You Happy, Cold dark and Yesterday, Friday Let Me Down, Crazy Eyes, At Tension, Alone Too Long and Im Just a Kid (don't make me feel like a man). To name a few. Enjoy! 🎶😁
If they were outstanding they would have been singles.
Possibly should have offered Hall the opportunity to purchase the other half vs. saddling him to a complete stranger.
Be quiet and let your lawyers do all the talking. All I'm saying.
Yeah! And when there done talking all your money will be gone!
How does he feel he has a right to sell a catalog that doesn’t belong solely to him only
I'm assuming it's like shares of a company and John owns x number of them.
He has a right to sell HIS SHARE of it. There's zero doubt in that. It's his. It has no effect on Hall's ownership of his share. Hall will just have a different co-owner to deal with, but he'll still have a say in how his music is used.
@@BurnLikeAFlame that depends. Sometimes partnership agreements can have restrictions for selling.
If there are no restrictions in their contract, he does have the right up sell his half of the company.
He’s not selling the entire thing; he is only selling his share. Did you even watch the video?
What’s he talking about? Daryl has been a respected solo artist for YEARS. Daryl can make it without John but John can’t make it without Daryl. Daryl has the greater voice.
The main thing that I got out of this was that John Oates has a new album out.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Doesn't matter. He's living in the Hall and Oates shadow forever. The wacky music business don't care for the old. They want fresh blood to screw over!
Yep.
yup.. and it’s a yawn.
@@ronluckenbach9492 Oates has always been about the slow, folk music - even though he has blak in him. While Hall was about Motown soul - even though he too made that folk music to start, then a little new wave. So hall kind of funked the duo - or two artists up a bit.
Just sad man. Such a great duo. Classic music. I hope they work things out. Peace to both of them!
This is like Peanut Butter fighting with Jelly 😂 or Finding out your parents never really loved each other 😩💔
Hall And Oates in a legal battle,..........'Say It Isn't So'??......oh, no, no.
I see what you did there 😁
In my head, you guys are brothers.... The family is broken. I still love you both!
Sorry to hear this. These guys were a huge musical influence on me.
Me too!! I always thought they were such a great team!
Get it together guys if you can. You guys are Classics!
Their lawyers will be stirring the poison and dragging it out whilst making millions
At 71 been a fan for over 40 years please gentlemen get it together life is too short 😢 don't let money come between you all will always love Hall and Oates ❤❤ ❤🎉
Good music
He never suggested that his partner could buy it. It would be clandestine if he was going to sell with giving him prior notice.
This is absolutely heartbreaking. I had no idea this is the way they worked. As a young girl in the 70 & 80's this my band. I love their music. 😢 So so sad.
Well, we as fans will forever cherish the music that you gentlemen released over the years. The only unfortunate thing about this is that I missed out on my opportunity to see you guys live. But it's amazing that we see the great chemistry that these two have and for years, they weren't as close as we thought they were. It's said that it has come to this but being that they're in their mid to late 70's and spent over 50 years performing together, I don't blame them for calling it quits. Thank you for all the music and I wish you both success in life and with your solo careers!
He really has a good voice. Never really heard him sing solo before but I’m quite impressed.
This is definitely more complicated than selling half of a catalog. The new partner would have access to their likeness, videos, and their legacy. New technology makes them vulnerable.
Wow, didn’t know Oates could really sing! Good for him!
It's pretty sad that they broke up. I really enjoyed the songs they sang, but things happen, I hope things work out for them.
This legal dispute is a maneater please squash this beef I wouldn't sell the catalog though
People do it because they might want it to spend the money while they are alive.
Sell Sell and enjoy it yourself then give to family ,friends,and charity.
…as a kid, I always thought that John Oates wasn’t enough to be besides Daryl Hall, he was in my POV just "a somebody" living out ot of the talent and voice of Daryl…. 40 years after I think the same, John…. You should be extremely grateful and respectful with Daryl Hall, what you have now and will have forever is because of Him, not you. Period.
This kind of thing makes me sad, but people change, and sometimes that means growing apart.
Hall and Oates beefing? Say it isn’t so because I can’t go for that, they just need some 1 on 1
CORNY....