วีดีโอ

Hello, I am just watching videos from these metal detector professionals and my question is: What is the main motivation for doing this? They spent a lot of time, a lot of money buying expensive equipment to get pull tabs, coins, metal trash, etc. most of the time?. What you get after expending time, money and expectations? What balance the equation?

Whites tdi and tdi sl had dicrimination.

Is it worth 2500 dollars.

I would like to see the gerrett axiom sdc and the algoforce e1500 and the mine lab 6000.with the best setting as nd best small coils for hunting hold in differrent types of mineralization for small gold and the beach.

What about for depth for heavy big piece gold Who is better?

Пожалуй не стоит менять AT MAX на vortex?

the multi frequency range of the vortex (imo) makes it a toy detector

Fail.

Single frequently machines have issues?? What you mean any Garrett !!! I can name you so many single frequently units like the Golden mask , Deeptech , Makro Racer ,that will cope just fine .. When using the 340 in the test ,try less sensitivity & not scrubbing the ground with the coil, you will get a better signal ...

Informative and easy to understand. Thank you. I've got an Equinox 800, an Xterrapro, and a couple less expensive and outdated machines. I was thinking about the Manticore. But I'm the guy you talked about, which is the guy that would get confused. Think I'll hold off. Thank you for the info and the common sense.

Set a mineralized rock on top of the nugget see which detector finds it.

Dude that's not a real test. Flat ground proves nothing it's just a waste of time. Set some large rocks next to those objects then see which detector find them

My first Garrett was the 400i,i found a gold ring on the first outing,multiple 18th to 21st century coins,loved it,still have it,i'm using the deus2 right now,but i still love that 400i,believe me Garrett will sort the gremlins,Peace out from Ireland.

A Vanquish 340 is better than both IMHO...

At this point I still see no reason to buy a Garrett, they are very lacking compared to other detectors of similar price range. It would be nice if they would come up with a higher end machine that competes with other really good machines.

These machines seem years behind the other top brands on target ID.

Thank you for showing.

Apex is better and that’s not saying much

I don't rate either , I'll stick to my Deus 2 . Good video thanks

I hunt by the tone. I usually hunt woods or farmers fields. I don't really care if I dig a barber or indian. I dig it all . Do not hunt parks because most have been gone over a dozen times over the years.

When companies bring to market a product with bugs - it puts a great dent in the reputation of the firm and craters the image.

A very big difference between the two. Thanks for that information.

I was a garrett users and ran apex for 3 years and most of time I couldn't run muti it was unstable most of time so always use single frequency plus I always went off sound and tones rather then numbers And now I use minelab equinox and never looked back

Who in their right mind would buy a Vortex? My 20 year old Explorer 2 would out detect the Vortex with the default programs.

Good video ! The target IDs although better are to clumped together. Hopefully Garrett will get the issue resolved. The Apex definitely looked more in tune to what the Target IDs should be. Merry Christmas and stay in touch !

your audio went out a quarter in.

great info vid mate

Thanks for posting all the information and demonstration. Happy Holidays.

Nice video. Thank you and happy Hunting 👍👍

No 53 or 54? I wonder how many other ID numbers are missing.

Apex is better. Vortex is really not good.🕵‍♀️

Thanks for all of your work on the Vortex and Apex Andrew. What you are showing is basically what I am seeing too. The Vortex is just slightly deeper and more stable here than the Apex but I was hoping for much more. I just posted a topic on Detector Prospector about the VX9 Multi frequency notching and weird target IDs and maybe why that is. Look forward to your input.

I’ve owned Garrett since the middle 90s but when I purchased a fisher cz6 a my MD life changed. My friends and I cleaned out the silver in local parks and to this day no matter which machine is used, very few silver signals are left:)

great video! happy holidays to your family and you!

Qual é o melhor em profundidade?

Boa noite. Podes fazer um resumo entre o vortex eo Apex?

For beggenier what recommend??

Do you have the update.

3rd video I've watched on vortex and things aren't looking too good for this machine 😕

hoping Garrett would have a winn here but seams to be a mediocre offering like the Apex I had the Vanquish 540 pro a nice entry level machine but went back to my xp Deus thanks for the video

Thanks

I’ll take the Vanquish over the Garrett, the Vortex tones are horrendous

Great video, so what are your feelings on the Manacor versus the Gold monster with the MA coil and the new sensitivity we’ve been hitting targets I would say just as good as the gold monster a friend of mine he thinks it’s better than the gold monster, I haven’t had enough time with it yet to make that assumption, but I’m impressed with how good it’s doing with Gold, but with the 8 inch coilI have the nine as well I would say on Gold the 8 inch coil is better than the nine anyways keep up the great content and let me know what you think

Digging bebes with bill southern.in arizona.

I havent seen any close up pics of the cam locks. Did they use the old school style twist locks lol?

Get on your knees dig 100 targets......reality....your selling detectors😂

Staged

😒

What was your ground balance number? I live near Culpeper Virginia and mine was 89. Thanks

thanks for this video. im gonna take my axiom to oregon beaches soon