Large Gold | Garrett Axiom vs Minelab GPX 6000 vs GPX 4500

แชร์
ฝัง
  • เผยแพร่เมื่อ 24 ก.พ. 2024
  • Video of Minelab GPX 4500, GPX 6000 and Garrett Axiom comparing signals on large gold nuggets & lead at various depths.
  • บันเทิง

ความคิดเห็น • 33

  • @phrunt
    @phrunt 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

    Both the 4500 and the Axiom did so well being handicapped by the DD coils yet still keeping up, if they had a mono on, I'm guessing it would have changed the results a lot, My guess is the 4500 would be the winner, The 6000 from what I've been able to see in my testing is not a deep machine so the Axiom would likely come second. But then if reality kicks in the 4500 can run huge coils, there are 36" coils made for it, so when it comes to big deep targets out of the three it's always going to be the winner.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea totally agree on the 4500/500 with big coils being deeper on the big deep targets. Unfortunately, I didn't have any big mono coils to test on the 4500.

  • @cafercan3678
    @cafercan3678 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Selam bir ricam olacak bir minalap almam isdiyorum senden bir tavsiye isdiyorum sizin teçrübelerinizden faydalanakmak isdiyorum hangi modeli tavsiye edersiniz saygılar türkiyeden yazıyorum.

  • @chrisc8856
    @chrisc8856 15 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    Would be great to see the 14x9 coil tek oval on the 6k. My favorite unless going for very small then the 5x10 coil tek is the pick.

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  15 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @chrisc8856 unfortunately I don't have the 14x9 otherwise I would have included it.

  • @IBRAKEFORBEDROCK
    @IBRAKEFORBEDROCK 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    All the slugs were lo/hi tones .....but the 6K barely heard the .95 with the bigger coil. interesting. Were those all mono coils with exception of the 14x16 axiom

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yea, I was surprised by that as well. 4500 mono 11, DD 15". 6000 both mono. Axiom both DD

  • @PhaseSkater
    @PhaseSkater 20 วันที่ผ่านมา +1

    So which is the best machine for looking for bigger nuggets at max depth?

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @PhaseSkater from what I've been seeing I'd go with either the 5000 and a big mono coil or the Axiom with the 14x16 mono

    • @PhaseSkater
      @PhaseSkater 20 วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@RelicsRings everyone keeps telling me to get the 6000 and I know it picks up really small pickers but when I’m detecting I’m pretty much only hunting for gram size nuggets. Half a gram in size is on the lowest end of acceptable nuggets for me

  • @roymanewell4958
    @roymanewell4958 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    great vid thanks

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Glad you liked it. Thanks

  • @denboul4964
    @denboul4964 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +2

    your ground balancing almost right on the targets , you are nocking them out

  • @dddsss3439
    @dddsss3439 3 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Спасибо за видео!👍
    А что вы выбрали бы если стоял выбор между Axom gpx 6000? Спасибо заранее!

    • @user-sx9nv3oh5r
      @user-sx9nv3oh5r หลายเดือนก่อน

      7000) на счет аксиома не знаю, но 6000 это игрушка. Просто 1000чник на максималках. Не внятный, не понятный, да, мелочь щелкает хорошо, но сигнал на все плюс минус один и тот же...

  • @diggingwithphasetech
    @diggingwithphasetech วันที่ผ่านมา

    Does the Axiom threshold always drift that much? Is there any way to adjust it so that it's smoother?

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  วันที่ผ่านมา

      @diggingwithphasetech it really just depends on EMI in the area. This particular site was across the raod from a military base. Most places I can ge it pretty smooth

    • @diggingwithphasetech
      @diggingwithphasetech วันที่ผ่านมา

      @@RelicsRings Thanks.

  • @GPZ816
    @GPZ816 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    Thanks for putting this video together, really was a good comparison of the three detectors. I have been curious on how these detectors would perform on the larger nuggets. Seems all three detectors did fairly close on those targets with the available coils used. Were any of these coils spiral wound?

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Only the 15" DD used on the 4500 was spiral wound. I'm betting a spiral wound mono on the 4500 would have done much better. But I don't have one I could try.

  • @paulblanton1793
    @paulblanton1793 4 หลายเดือนก่อน

    In your opinion, would you use one of these machines looking for artillery shells and cannonballs on a Civil War site? I’ve already currently dug a cannonball and a confederate artillery shell at almost 3 feet deep with the XP deus 2 with a 9”inch coil. Just not sure how much deeper I want to dig stuff.😂 mainly because I don’t want to dig a bunch of junk iron targets in the process. I value your opinion because of all your experience👌🏼 Thanks

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  4 หลายเดือนก่อน

      Yes any of the 3 I would use for artillery shells. But if you're already digging them that deep with the D2 and don't want to dig deeper, I would just stick with the Deus.

  • @kinghunter2330
    @kinghunter2330 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    nice my friend❤

  • @bamadave6324
    @bamadave6324 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    They say the axiom performs about as well as gpx. What about on brass? I know the weight savings is a big benefit over gpx

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      I haven't tried deep buttons yet. But I would assume they would be pretty close to the same in performance.

  • @1CarsonChris
    @1CarsonChris 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

    I'm thinking about buying a PI machine. Which one of those 3 is the best balanced?

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  5 หลายเดือนก่อน

      What do you mean by balanced? Weight wise or capabilities?

    • @1CarsonChris
      @1CarsonChris 5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@RelicsRings which one wears out the arm the least. Easiest to swing?

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      @@1CarsonChris GPX 6000 is easiest to swing. But the Axiom had the best overall feel and ergonomics IMO

    • @UbuteyAustralia
      @UbuteyAustralia 2 หลายเดือนก่อน +1

      The 4500 by far 😏👍

  • @stevegeiner3986
    @stevegeiner3986 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    Swinging that slow isn’t realistic is it?

    • @RelicsRings
      @RelicsRings  5 หลายเดือนก่อน +5

      When you're hunting for gold or deep targets it is. 3 seconds from one side to the other is my sweep speed. Then I slow down even more over a possible target.

  • @1CarsonChris
    @1CarsonChris 5 หลายเดือนก่อน

    15" nulls out.